Research ArticleNeuroscience Free access | 10.1172/jci.insight.123193
1Institute for Translational Neuroscience and
2Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
3Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, California, USA.
4Graduate Program in Neuroscience,
5Department of Neuroscience, and
6Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
7Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
8Research Informatics Support Systems Bioinformatics, Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Address correspondence to: Harry T. Orr, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, 2101 6th Street SE, Delivery Code 2641B, 3110 WMBB, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. Phone: 612.625.3647; Email: orrxx002@umn.edu.
Find articles by Friedrich, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Institute for Translational Neuroscience and
2Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
3Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, California, USA.
4Graduate Program in Neuroscience,
5Department of Neuroscience, and
6Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
7Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
8Research Informatics Support Systems Bioinformatics, Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Address correspondence to: Harry T. Orr, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, 2101 6th Street SE, Delivery Code 2641B, 3110 WMBB, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. Phone: 612.625.3647; Email: orrxx002@umn.edu.
Find articles by Kordasiewicz, H. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Institute for Translational Neuroscience and
2Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
3Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, California, USA.
4Graduate Program in Neuroscience,
5Department of Neuroscience, and
6Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
7Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
8Research Informatics Support Systems Bioinformatics, Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Address correspondence to: Harry T. Orr, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, 2101 6th Street SE, Delivery Code 2641B, 3110 WMBB, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. Phone: 612.625.3647; Email: orrxx002@umn.edu.
Find articles by O’Callaghan, B. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Institute for Translational Neuroscience and
2Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
3Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, California, USA.
4Graduate Program in Neuroscience,
5Department of Neuroscience, and
6Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
7Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
8Research Informatics Support Systems Bioinformatics, Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Address correspondence to: Harry T. Orr, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, 2101 6th Street SE, Delivery Code 2641B, 3110 WMBB, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. Phone: 612.625.3647; Email: orrxx002@umn.edu.
Find articles by Handler, H. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Institute for Translational Neuroscience and
2Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
3Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, California, USA.
4Graduate Program in Neuroscience,
5Department of Neuroscience, and
6Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
7Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
8Research Informatics Support Systems Bioinformatics, Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Address correspondence to: Harry T. Orr, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, 2101 6th Street SE, Delivery Code 2641B, 3110 WMBB, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. Phone: 612.625.3647; Email: orrxx002@umn.edu.
Find articles by Wagener, C. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Institute for Translational Neuroscience and
2Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
3Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, California, USA.
4Graduate Program in Neuroscience,
5Department of Neuroscience, and
6Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
7Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
8Research Informatics Support Systems Bioinformatics, Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Address correspondence to: Harry T. Orr, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, 2101 6th Street SE, Delivery Code 2641B, 3110 WMBB, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. Phone: 612.625.3647; Email: orrxx002@umn.edu.
Find articles by Duvick, L. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Institute for Translational Neuroscience and
2Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
3Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, California, USA.
4Graduate Program in Neuroscience,
5Department of Neuroscience, and
6Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
7Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
8Research Informatics Support Systems Bioinformatics, Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Address correspondence to: Harry T. Orr, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, 2101 6th Street SE, Delivery Code 2641B, 3110 WMBB, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. Phone: 612.625.3647; Email: orrxx002@umn.edu.
Find articles by Swayze, E. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Institute for Translational Neuroscience and
2Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
3Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, California, USA.
4Graduate Program in Neuroscience,
5Department of Neuroscience, and
6Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
7Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
8Research Informatics Support Systems Bioinformatics, Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Address correspondence to: Harry T. Orr, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, 2101 6th Street SE, Delivery Code 2641B, 3110 WMBB, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. Phone: 612.625.3647; Email: orrxx002@umn.edu.
Find articles by Rainwater, O. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Institute for Translational Neuroscience and
2Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
3Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, California, USA.
4Graduate Program in Neuroscience,
5Department of Neuroscience, and
6Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
7Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
8Research Informatics Support Systems Bioinformatics, Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Address correspondence to: Harry T. Orr, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, 2101 6th Street SE, Delivery Code 2641B, 3110 WMBB, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. Phone: 612.625.3647; Email: orrxx002@umn.edu.
Find articles by Hofstra, B. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Institute for Translational Neuroscience and
2Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
3Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, California, USA.
4Graduate Program in Neuroscience,
5Department of Neuroscience, and
6Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
7Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
8Research Informatics Support Systems Bioinformatics, Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Address correspondence to: Harry T. Orr, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, 2101 6th Street SE, Delivery Code 2641B, 3110 WMBB, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. Phone: 612.625.3647; Email: orrxx002@umn.edu.
Find articles by Benneyworth, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Institute for Translational Neuroscience and
2Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
3Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, California, USA.
4Graduate Program in Neuroscience,
5Department of Neuroscience, and
6Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
7Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
8Research Informatics Support Systems Bioinformatics, Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Address correspondence to: Harry T. Orr, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, 2101 6th Street SE, Delivery Code 2641B, 3110 WMBB, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. Phone: 612.625.3647; Email: orrxx002@umn.edu.
Find articles by Nichols-Meade, T. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Institute for Translational Neuroscience and
2Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
3Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, California, USA.
4Graduate Program in Neuroscience,
5Department of Neuroscience, and
6Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
7Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
8Research Informatics Support Systems Bioinformatics, Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Address correspondence to: Harry T. Orr, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, 2101 6th Street SE, Delivery Code 2641B, 3110 WMBB, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. Phone: 612.625.3647; Email: orrxx002@umn.edu.
Find articles by Yang, P. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Institute for Translational Neuroscience and
2Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
3Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, California, USA.
4Graduate Program in Neuroscience,
5Department of Neuroscience, and
6Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
7Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
8Research Informatics Support Systems Bioinformatics, Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Address correspondence to: Harry T. Orr, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, 2101 6th Street SE, Delivery Code 2641B, 3110 WMBB, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. Phone: 612.625.3647; Email: orrxx002@umn.edu.
Find articles by Chen, Z. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Institute for Translational Neuroscience and
2Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
3Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, California, USA.
4Graduate Program in Neuroscience,
5Department of Neuroscience, and
6Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
7Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
8Research Informatics Support Systems Bioinformatics, Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Address correspondence to: Harry T. Orr, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, 2101 6th Street SE, Delivery Code 2641B, 3110 WMBB, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. Phone: 612.625.3647; Email: orrxx002@umn.edu.
Find articles by Ortiz, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Institute for Translational Neuroscience and
2Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
3Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, California, USA.
4Graduate Program in Neuroscience,
5Department of Neuroscience, and
6Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
7Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
8Research Informatics Support Systems Bioinformatics, Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Address correspondence to: Harry T. Orr, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, 2101 6th Street SE, Delivery Code 2641B, 3110 WMBB, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. Phone: 612.625.3647; Email: orrxx002@umn.edu.
Find articles by Clark, H. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Institute for Translational Neuroscience and
2Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
3Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, California, USA.
4Graduate Program in Neuroscience,
5Department of Neuroscience, and
6Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
7Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
8Research Informatics Support Systems Bioinformatics, Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Address correspondence to: Harry T. Orr, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, 2101 6th Street SE, Delivery Code 2641B, 3110 WMBB, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. Phone: 612.625.3647; Email: orrxx002@umn.edu.
Find articles by Öz, G. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
1Institute for Translational Neuroscience and
2Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
3Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, California, USA.
4Graduate Program in Neuroscience,
5Department of Neuroscience, and
6Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
7Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
8Research Informatics Support Systems Bioinformatics, Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Address correspondence to: Harry T. Orr, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, 2101 6th Street SE, Delivery Code 2641B, 3110 WMBB, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. Phone: 612.625.3647; Email: orrxx002@umn.edu.
Find articles by Larson, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Institute for Translational Neuroscience and
2Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
3Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, California, USA.
4Graduate Program in Neuroscience,
5Department of Neuroscience, and
6Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
7Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
8Research Informatics Support Systems Bioinformatics, Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Address correspondence to: Harry T. Orr, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, 2101 6th Street SE, Delivery Code 2641B, 3110 WMBB, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. Phone: 612.625.3647; Email: orrxx002@umn.edu.
Find articles by Zoghbi, H. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Institute for Translational Neuroscience and
2Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
3Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, California, USA.
4Graduate Program in Neuroscience,
5Department of Neuroscience, and
6Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
7Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
8Research Informatics Support Systems Bioinformatics, Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Address correspondence to: Harry T. Orr, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, 2101 6th Street SE, Delivery Code 2641B, 3110 WMBB, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. Phone: 612.625.3647; Email: orrxx002@umn.edu.
Find articles by Henzler, C. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Institute for Translational Neuroscience and
2Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
3Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, California, USA.
4Graduate Program in Neuroscience,
5Department of Neuroscience, and
6Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
7Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
8Research Informatics Support Systems Bioinformatics, Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Address correspondence to: Harry T. Orr, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, 2101 6th Street SE, Delivery Code 2641B, 3110 WMBB, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. Phone: 612.625.3647; Email: orrxx002@umn.edu.
Find articles by Orr, H. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Published November 2, 2018 - More info
Spinocerebellar ataxia type 1 (SCA1) is a dominantly inherited ataxia caused by expansion of a translated CAG repeat encoding a glutamine tract in the ataxin-1 (ATXN1) protein. Despite advances in understanding the pathogenesis of SCA1, there are still no therapies to alter its progressive fatal course. RNA-targeting approaches have improved disease symptoms in preclinical rodent models of several neurological diseases. Here, we investigated the therapeutic capability of an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) targeting mouse Atxn1 in Atxn1154Q/2Q-knockin mice that manifest motor deficits and premature lethality. Following a single ASO treatment at 5 weeks of age, mice demonstrated rescue of these disease-associated phenotypes. RNA-sequencing analysis of genes with expression restored to WT levels in ASO-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice was used to demonstrate molecular differences between SCA1 pathogenesis in the cerebellum and disease in the medulla. Finally, select neurochemical abnormalities detected by magnetic resonance spectroscopy in vehicle-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice were reversed in the cerebellum and brainstem (a region containing the pons and the medulla) of ASO-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice. Together, these findings support the efficacy and therapeutic importance of directly targeting ATXN1 RNA expression as a strategy for treating both motor deficits and lethality in SCA1.
Spinocerebellar ataxia type 1 (SCA1) is a progressive fatal autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disease caused by a CAG trinucleotide repeat expansion within the coding region of the ataxin-1 (ATXN1) gene (1). Early symptoms typically include gait and limb ataxia, dysarthria, and dysmetria, with disease progressing over 10–15 years, culminating in death from dysphagia and/or respiratory failure secondary to involvement of medullary cranial nerve nuclei and anterior horn neurons (2–4). Accordingly, MRI scans of SCA1 patients reveal severe atrophy of the cerebellum and brainstem (5), and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) scans show neurochemical abnormalities in the cerebellum and brainstem, which correlate with the clinical status of patients (6, 7). Over the years, studies using mouse SCA1 models provided important insight into the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying SCA1 pathogenesis. Evidence supports the concept that the disease-causing mutation primarily acts through a toxic gain-of-function mechanism (8). Importantly, these pathogenic mechanisms are dampened by approaches that reduce expression of ATXN1. Studies using a doxycycline-regulated Pcp2-ATXN1[82Q]–transgenic mouse model of SCA1 demonstrated that repressing mutant protein production 12 weeks after sustained expression significantly improved Purkinje cell pathology, behavior deficits (9), and neurochemical abnormalities (10, 11). At an early stage of disease (6 weeks of age), Purkinje cell pathology and motor dysfunction were completely reversible. Partial recovery was seen after halting ATXN1 expression at a later stage of disease (12 weeks of age). Thus, at least for the Purkinje cell aspects of SCA1, a window of opportunity exists for gene-silencing strategies initiated after disease onset and before loss of Purkinje cells. ATXN1 RNAi administered by AAV injection into the deep cerebellar nuclei of Pcp2-ATXN1[82Q]–transgenic mice also demonstrates effectiveness in reducing ATXN1 expression as a means of alleviating SCA1-like symptoms in mice (12, 13). Additional studies using the Atxn1154Q/2Q-knockin mouse model of SCA1 show that even a partial reduction of ATXN1, on the order of 20%, results in detectable improvement in motor performance and cerebellar pathologies (14,15). Importantly, for any strategy targeting the reduction of both WT and mutant ATXN1 alleles, mice lacking Atxn1 show mild learning deficits but do not show signs of ataxia and neurodegeneration (16).
Antisense oligonucleotide–mediated (ASO-mediated) RNA suppression approaches have been used to reduce gene expression and improve disease symptoms in preclinical rodent models of several neurological diseases (17–20), including SCA2 and SCA3 (21, 22). There also have been successful clinical trials and FDA approval of an ASO drug that alters SMN2 gene splicing for SMA (23). Therefore, to study therapeutic effects of an ASO-mediated ATXN1 reduction strategy on motor performance and lethality in SCA1, we developed an ASO that selectively targeted mouse Atxn1 RNA throughout the brain. Atxn1154Q/2Q mice, generated by insertion of an expanded CAG repeat into 1 allele of the Atxn1 gene, express ATXN1[154Q] throughout the brain and display 2 key SCA1 phenotypes, ataxia and premature lethality (24). Upon administration of the Atxn1 ASO to Atxn1154Q/2Q mice, motor deficits were rescued and life span was extended. Previously, we utilized cerebellar RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to define a gene network associated with cerebellar disease progression in an ATXN1[82Q]-transgenic mouse model of SCA1 (25). Here we utilized RNA-seq on the cerebella, pontes, and medullae in vehicle-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q and ASO-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice as means of comparing disease process in regions of the brain severely affected by SCA1. Finally, we utilized cerebellar and brainstem MRS to evaluate its utility to provide noninvasive neurochemical biomarkers to monitor the response to ASO treatment in Atxn1154Q/2Q mice.
Identification and characterization of the optimal Atxn1 RNA-targeting ASO to reduce Atxn1 expression in regions of the brain. Initial characterization of Atxn1 RNA-targeting ASOs was performed using Atxn166Q/2Q mice. These mice were generated by inserting an expanded CAG tract of 82 repeats into 1 Atxn1 allele (26). With subsequent breeding, we found, by DNA sequence analysis, that the 82 repeats of the Atxn182Q allele had decreased to 66, thereby resulting in animals harboring the Atxn166Q allele. While Atxn166Q/2Q mice did not show robust signs of a SCA1-like disease, they allowed assessment of the effects of ASOs on expression of WT and polyQ-expanded Atxn1 alleles in animals that breed well. Three lead ASOs, 20-mer phosphorothioate-modified oligonucleotides designed to target mouse Atxn1 RNA having 2′-O-(-2-methoxy) ethyl modifications on 5 nucleotides on the 3′ and 5′ ends to increase stability and potency and decrease toxicity (27), were injected into the right lateral ventricle of 5-week-old Atxn166Q/2Q mice (500 μg in 10 μl at 25 nl/s). Two weeks after injection, the most substantial reductions of Atxn1 mRNA levels in regions critical for SCA1 pathology, the cerebellum, cerebral cortex, and brainstem, were observed with ASO353 (Supplemental Figure 1A; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.123193DS1).
Next, we assessed the cellular distribution of Atxn1 ASO353 in mouse brains. This was accomplished by administering an i.c.v. bolus injection of Atxn1 ASO353 to 8-week-old Atxn166Q/2Q mice and harvesting brains 2 weeks later. Sections were stained for the ASO using an antibody recognizing the ASO backbone chemistry (28). Supplemental Figure 1B shows that the Atxn1 ASO was taken up by neurons throughout the CNS, including the cerebellar cortex, cerebral cortex, and brainstem. Atxn1 ASO353 appeared to be uniformly taken up by neurons in both the cerebral cortex and brainstem (Supplemental Figure 1B). In the cerebellum, Purkinje cells took up Atxn1 ASO353 more robustly than granule cells, the most numerous neuronal type in the cerebellar cortex (Supplemental Figure 1C).
To examine the extent and duration to which ASO353-mediated reduction of Atxn1 RNA and protein endured, a cohort of Atxn166Q/2Q mice were given a single bolus i.c.v. injection at 5 weeks of age and Atxn1 RNA levels were assessed at 2, 12, and 18 weeks after i.c.v. injection. Figure 1 shows that the reduction in Atxn1 RNA following a single bolus i.c.v. injection was significant throughout most of the brain regions examined and persisted in most regions for 18 weeks after i.c.v. injection. Whole cerebellum was the one region examined where Atxn1 RNA reduction failed to reach statistical significance (Figure 1A). Supplemental Figure 2 presents analyses of ATXN1[2Q] and ATXN1[66Q] protein levels in 4 brain regions at 2, 12, and 18 weeks after ASO administration. Across all regions and times after i.c.v. injection ATXN1[2Q] and ATXN1[66Q] protein levels responded similarly to ASO administration. In the cerebral cortex and cerebellum, ATXN1[2Q] and ATXN1[66Q] levels were significantly reduced by the ASO at 12 weeks after injection yet were back to untreated levels at 18 weeks after i.c.v. injection (Supplemental Figure 2, A and D). In the pons, ATXN1[2Q] and ATXN1[66Q] levels remained significantly lower than in vehicle-treated mice up to 18 weeks after injection (Supplemental Figure 2C). Finally, in the medulla, there was a decrease in ATXN1[2Q] and ATXN1[66Q] protein levels at 2 and 12 weeks after i.c.v. injection that appeared to return to untreated levels at 18 weeks after injection. However, variability of results, particularly in ATXN1[66Q] from vehicle-treated mice at 18 weeks, precluded the medulla results from reaching statistical significance using 2-way ANOVA (Supplemental Figure 2B).
Reduction of Atxn1 RNA by Atxn1 ASO353 in brain regions of Atxn166Q/2Q mice affected by SCA1. 500 μg Atxn1 ASO or vehicle was delivered by bolus i.c.v. injection to 5-week-old Atxn166Q/2Q mice. Atxn1 RNA analyzed by qPCR at 2, 12, and 18 weeks after i.c.v. injection. (A) Atxn1 RNA analyzed from the cerebellum; 2-week ASO and vehicle (n = 6), 12-week ASO and vehicle (n = 3), 18-week ASO (n = 5), 18-week vehicle (n = 7). (B) Atxn1 RNA analyzed from the medulla; 2-week ASO and vehicle (n = 6), 12-week ASO and vehicle (n = 3), 18-week ASO (n = 5), 18-week vehicle (n = 7). (C) Atxn1 RNA analyzed from the pons; 2 week and 12-week ASO and vehicle (n = 3), 18-week ASO (n = 5), 18-week vehicle (n = 7). (D) Atxn1 RNA analyzed from the cerebral cortex; 2-week ASO and vehicle (n = 6), 12-week ASO and vehicle (n = 3), 18-week ASO (n = 5), 18-week vehicle (n = 7). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, 2-way ANOVA.
i.c.v. injection of Atxn1 ASO into Atxn1154Q/2Q mice mitigates motor deficits and prolongs survival. To examine effectiveness of the Atxn1-targeting ASO in reversing SCA1-like symptoms, we utilized Atxn1154Q/2Q mice that develop two key features of SCA1, notably ataxia and premature death. First, the ability of ASO353 to reduce levels of Atxn1 RNA was examined following a bolus i.c.v. injection into the right lateral ventricle of Atxn1154Q/2Q mice (500 μg in 10 μl at 25 nl/s) at 5 weeks of age. Reductions in total mouse Atxn1 RNA were achieved in the brainstems and cerebella of Atxn1154Q/2Q mice at 6 and 24 weeks after a bolus i.c.v. injection of ASO353 (Figure 2A). As seen in Atxn166Q/2Q mice, the degree of Atxn1 RNA reduction in Atxn1154Q/2Q mice was greater in extracts from the brainstems compared with those from the cerebella. While Atxn1 was expressed in both Purkinje cell and granule cell layers (Supplemental Figure 3C), compared with granule cells, Purkinje cells more readily took up ASOs (Supplemental Figure 1C and ref 27). To more accurately evaluate the extent of ASO-mediated reduction of Atxn1 RNA in Purkinje cells, a prominent cellular target of SCA1 (2, 29), ASO353 was administered to Atxn1154Q/2Q mice at 16 weeks of age. Atxn1 RNA levels were determined 2 weeks later in brainstem and cerebellar extracts as well as extracts prepared from the laser-dissected Purkinje cell layer (Supplemental Figure 3, A and B). ASO-mediated reduction of Atxn1 RNA in the dissected Purkinje cell layer relative to that in vehicle-injected animals was greater than that detected in whole cerebellar extracts, similar to the level of reduction detected in brainstem extracts (Figure 2B).
Reduction of Atxn1 in the brainstems, cerebella, and Purkinje cells of Atxn1154Q/2Q mice. (A) RNA from Atxn1154Q/2Q mice analyzed by qPCR at 6 and 24 weeks after i.c.v. injection of the ATXN1 ASO353. qPCR data are presented as the average ± SEM; 6-week brainstem and cerebellum (n = 6). (B) Atxn1 RNA brainstems, cerebella, and dissected Purkinje cells (PC layer) from Atxn1154Q/2Q mice receiving a bolus i.c.v. injection of ASO353 (500 μg) at 16 weeks, with analysis at 18 weeks; brainstem (n = 4), cerebellum (n = 7), Purkinje cell layer (n = 3). qPCR data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, by t test.
The ability of Atxn1 ASO353 to effect motor performance was examined by giving Atxn1154Q/2Q mice a bolus i.c.v. injection (500 μg in 10 μl at 25 nl/s) at 8–9 weeks of age. This age was selected as an early mid-stage of disease, when mice have a motor deficit on the rotarod and are beginning to manifest motor deficits in home cage motor behavior (24). Mice were followed by monitoring their motor performance on the balance beam at 28 weeks of age and on the accelerating rotarod at various ages out to 31 weeks (Supplemental Figure 4A). At all ages examined, ASO353-injected Atxn1154Q/2Q mice showed no improvement on the rotarod compared with Atxn1154Q/2Q mice injected with vehicle (Supplemental Figure 4A). At 28 weeks, balance beam performance of ASO-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice was significantly better than the performance of Atxn1154Q/2Q mice injected with vehicle. Performance of ASO-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice was equal to that of vehicle-injected WT/C57BL/6 mice (Supplemental Figure 4B).
Next, the effects of administering ASO353 at a very early stage of disease (5 weeks of age) were examined when motor deficits were apparent on the accelerating rotarod, but not through observation of home cage behavior, and prior to Atxn1154Q/2Q mice showing the failure to gain weight phenotype (24). Mice were assessed for motor performance using the accelerating rotarod and the balance beam at baseline at 4–5 weeks of age, just prior to ASO353 injection (Figure 3A). At 18 weeks (13 weeks after ASO injection), ASO353-injected mice showed significantly improved performance on the rotarod compared with that of vehicle-injected Atxn1154Q/2Q mice by 21 weeks of age (Figure 3A). Atxn1154Q/2Q ASO353-injected mice also showed improved motor performance on the balance beam at 15 and 26 weeks of age (Figure 3B). Rotarod performance of ASO353-injected Atxn1154Q/2Q mice remained significantly improved over that of vehicle-injected Atxn1154Q/2Q mice out to the last assessment at 27 weeks of age (22 weeks after i.c.v. injection). At this time point, rotarod assessments were ceased as vehicle-injected Atxn1154Q/2Q mice began to die.
Recovery of SCA1-like phenotypes in Atxn1154Q/2Q mice receiving ASO353 by i.c.v. injection at 5 weeks of age. Mice were administered ASO353 or vehicle (saline) by bolus i.c.v. injection at 5 weeks. (A) Motor performance on a rotarod between ages 5 weeks and 27 weeks. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, 1-way ANOVA. (B) Motor performance on a balance beam at ages 15 weeks and 26 weeks. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, 1-way ANOVA. (C) Survival, plotted as Kaplan-Meyer curves, for mice receiving a bolus i.c.v. injection of 500 μg ASO353 or vehicle (saline) at 5 weeks. ***P = 0.0001, log-rank Mantel-Cox test; P = 0.0005, Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test. (D) i.c.v. injection of ASO353 fails to improve the failure-to-gain weight phenotype in Atxn1154Q/2Q mice; WT C57BL/6 uninjected (n = 23), WT C57BL/6 vehicle (n = 16), Atxn1154Q/2Q uninjected (n = 19), Atxn1154Q/2Q vehicle (n = 15), and Atxn1154Q/2Q ASO353 (n = 12).
The capability of a single Atxn1 ASO353 injection at 5 weeks of age to prolong survival of ASO353 Atxn1154Q/2Q mice was evaluated by combining the group of mice injected for the motor performance assessment with a second cohort of mice injected solely to monitor survival. As shown in Figure 3C, an i.c.v. injection of Atxn1 ASO353 resulted in a highly significant prolongation of the survival of Atxn1154Q/2Q mice. Median survival was extended by almost 7 weeks over vehicle and uninjected Atxn1154Q/2Q mice (P = 0.0001 by the Mantel-Cox log-rank test and P = 0.0005 using the Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test).
Unlike the positive effects of a single ASO353 i.c.v. injection at 5 weeks on motor performance and life span of Atxn1154Q/2Q mice, i.c.v. injected Atxn1 ASO353 was unable to alleviate the failure of Atxn1154Q/2Q mice to gain weight with age (Figure 3D). Since ASOs cross the blood brain barrier poorly (30), these results might be evidence of either peripheral pathology or pathology in a brain region not as accessible to the ASO.
Differential gene expression and gene coexpression networks — an overview of Atxn1154Q/2Q disease in pons, cerebellum, and medulla. The ability of Atxn1 ASO353 to mitigate SCA1-like symptoms of motor performance deficits (ataxia) and premature lethality in Atxn1154Q/2Q mice coupled with the physiologically accurate spatial and temporal expression of ATXN1[154Q] provides an experimental platform with which to compare disease-associated molecular pathways in different regions of the CNS affected by SCA1 pathology. Histological (2, 29) and MRI studies (31) of SCA1 patients indicate that the greatest neuronal loss occurs in the cerebellum and brainstem (pons and medulla). In addition, within the hypoglossal nucleus of Atxn1154Q/2Q mice, included within the medulla portion of the dissection (Supplemental Figure 5A), there are signs of neuronal pathology and astrocytosis by 6 months of age (4). Thus, we focused our analyses on these regions.
To compare molecular aspects of SCA1-like disease in the cerebella and brainstems of Atxn1154Q/2Q animals given a bolus ASO353 i.c.v. injection at 5 weeks, we obtained RNA-seq data sets on polyA+ RNA from vehicle- and Atxn1 ASO353-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q cerebella at 18 weeks of age. Atxn1154Q/2Q pons and medulla, including the inferior olive and hypoglossal nuclei, were also analyzed at both 18 and 28 weeks of age (see Supplemental Table 1 for summary of RNA-seq analyses). As shown in Figure 3, A and C, these ages correspond to time points at the initiation of improvement in motor performance on the rotarod (18 weeks) and just prior to extension of survival (28 weeks) in Atxn1 ASO353-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice.
Consistent with previous RNA-seq analysis of Pcp2-ATXN1[82Q] cerebella (25), there was a sizeable number of differentially expressed (DE) genes in Atxn1154Q/2Q cerebella compared with WT cerebella at 18 weeks of age, with a majority being downregulated (Figure 4A and Supplemental Table 2). In contrast, essentially no DE genes were detected in the pontes and medullae of 18-week-old Atxn1154Q/2Q mice. By 28 weeks of age, a robust number of DE genes were found in Atxn1154Q/2Q pontes and medullae, with the number of downregulated DE genes being slightly more than the number of upregulated DE genes (Figure 4A and Supplemental Table 2). Therefore, disease in Atxn1154Q/2Q mice begins considerably later in the pons and medulla than in the cerebellum, as by RNA-seq–based assessment. Supplemental Figure 5B shows that developmental onset of Atxn1 expression was not delayed in the pons and medulla compared with the cerebellum. Thus, delay in onset of disease in the pons and medulla, when compared with onset of disease in the cerebellum, is unlikely to be due to a simple delay in onset of Atxn1 expression in the pons and medulla. Importantly, the numbers of DE genes were substantially reduced in all 3 brain regions examined in Atxn1154Q/2Q mice treated with Atxn1 ASO353 at 5 weeks of age (Figure 4B). The reduction in DE genes in ASO353-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice ranged from a high of 92% (1,430 to 109 DE genes) in the medulla at 28 weeks to a low of 79% (2,947 to 613 DE genes) in the pons at 28 weeks.
Differentially expressed genes in the cerebella, pontes, and medullae of Atxn1154Q/2Q mice receiving vehicle or ASO353 by i.c.v. (A) Genes differentially expressed in vehicle-treated WT versus vehicle-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice from the cerebellum at 18 weeks, the pons at 18 and 28 weeks, and the medulla at 18 and 28 weeks. The black portion of the bars depicts the number of genes downregulated and the gray portion of the bars depicts the number of genes upregulated in vehicle-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice. (B) Genes differentially expressed in vehicle-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q versus ASO353-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice from the cerebellum at 18 weeks, the pons at 18 and 28 weeks, and the medulla at 18 and 28 weeks. The black portion of the bars depicts the number of genes downregulated and the gray portion of the bars depicts the number of genes upregulated in ASO353-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice. In A and B, numbers above bars indicate the number genes with differential expression. (C and D) GSEA of the Magenta module compared with differentially expressed gene lists from the cerebella of 18-week-old and medullae of 28-week-old Atxn1154Q/2Q mice, respectively. Significance was determined by the observed enrichment score compared to a set of null scores generated by permuting the gene ranked order 10,000 times.
Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) allows a comparison of the distribution of a defined set of genes (32), e.g., the cerebellar Magenta gene coexpression module, within a ranked ordered list of genes generated from a RNA-seq analysis of a group of samples, i.e., DE genes from 18-week-old vehicle-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice compared with WT mice ranked by direction and degree of differential expression. The more clustered the distribution of the Magenta gene set is toward one end or the other of the list of the Atxn1154Q/2Q cerebellar DE genes (skewed toward the top or bottom of the ordered list), the more the defined gene set correlates with the phenotypic class represented by the gene list, i.e., disease. Figure 4C shows the result of a GSEA of the Magenta module gene set (Magenta-GSEA) compared with the list of cerebellar DE genes from 18-week-old WT vehicle versus treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice. Distribution of genes within the Magenta module is highly skewed (NES = –11.43, P < 0.0001) toward the end of the gene list containing genes with lowest expression in the cerebella of 18-week-old Atxn1154Q/2Q vehicle-treated mice versus vehicle-treated WT mice. While the medulla Magenta-GSEA also showed some skewing of Magenta genes toward the end of the 28-week-old Atxn1154Q/2Q DE gene list containing genes with lowest level of expression (NES = –5.60, P < 0.0001), the enrichment score curve for the medulla Magenta-GSEA analysis was considerably flatter than the enrichment score curve for the cerebellar Magenta-GSEA (Figure 4D). Thus, these Magenta-GSEAs support the concept that cerebellar disease in Pcp2-ATXN1[82Q] mice correlates highly with cerebellar disease in Atxn1154Q/2Q mice and to a lesser degree with disease in the medulla of Atxn1154Q/2Q mice.
Brainstem disease–associated transcriptome profile in Atxn1154Q/2Q mice is distinct from the cerebellar disease–associated transcriptome profile. Weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA), a reproducible and effective approach to link coexpressed gene modules with phenotypic traits (33, 34), was recently used to generate the Magenta coexpression module and correlate it to Purkinje cell disease progression in ATXN1-transgenic mice (25). WGCNA applied to the medulla RNA-seq data set at 28 weeks of age revealed a module of 1,510 genes, designated the Brown module, that is highly associated with disease (t test, P = 10–8) in Atxn1154Q/2Q mice. To further assess the Brown medulla gene network connection to disease, a transcriptional heatmap analysis of the Brown gene module was generated (Figure 5). This analysis showed that in the medulla at 28 weeks ASO-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice clustered with the WT group (Figure 5A). In contrast, a similar analysis of the Brown module in the cerebellum data set at 18 weeks revealed considerably less evidence of clustering of ASO-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice with the WT mice (Figure 5B). We interpret the results of these transcriptional heatmap analyses as support for the concept that the Brown gene network has a greater role in disease in the medullae than in the cerebella of Atxn1154Q/2Q mice.
Medulla Brown WGCNA module is associated with disease in Atxn1154Q/2Q mice. (A) Transcriptional heatmap of Brown module genes for the medulla of vehicle- and ASO353-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice and vehicle-treated WT mice. (B) Transcriptional heatmap of Brown module genes for the cerebella of vehicle and ASO353-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice and vehicle-treated WT mice; ASO-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice (n = 7), vehicle-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice (n = 7), and vehicle-treated WT mice (n = 8).
To query further the similarity between the medulla and cerebellar disease–associated WGCNA gene networks, we generated a connectivity diagram identifying the hub genes, i.e., the core, most highly connected genes in the module, for the medulla Brown module. When compared with the cerebellar Magenta module (25), only 1 of the top 10 Magenta hub genes was found in the Brown module, and only 1 of the top 10 Brown hub genes was found in the Magenta module (Supplemental Table 3). Moreover, of the top 100 Magenta genes, only 16 are found in the Brown module, with the highest ranking of these 16 genes ranked 233rd in the Brown module. Conversely, of the top 100 Brown module genes, only 6 of these are in the Magenta module, with the highest ranking of these genes ranked 166th in the Magenta module.
Next, we determined the overlap in genes between the medulla Brown module and the previously generated cerebellar Magenta module as a means of comparing the disease process in these two regions of the CNS. To accurately assess the overlap between the Magenta cerebellum module and the Brown medulla module, we first restricted the comparison to the set of all genes that were detected in both WGCNA analyses (i.e., those genes that met minimum expression thresholds in both tissue types). There were 11,336 genes in common between the WGCNA analyses. Of the 342 Magenta module genes and 1,510 medulla Brown module genes, respectively, 333 and 1,053 were in the set of 11,336 genes shared by both analyses. Of these two reduced module lists, there was a significant overlap (P < 4.607E-09) of 65 genes (Figure 6). When Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) was performed on the Magenta and Brown modules, the top most significant canonical pathways for each module were quite distinct (Figure 6). As shown previously (25), the Magenta IPA canonical pathways were enriched for signaling pathways. The Brown IPA pathways, on the other hand, included several metabolic/biosynthetic pathways and none of the Magenta signaling pathways. While the set of 65 overlapping genes had no significant IPA pathways after Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple testing, it is interesting that cyclin-dependent kinase- 5 (CDK5) signaling was the top uncorrected pathway (Figure 6), since Cdk5 regulates several fundamental processes thought to have a role in neurodegeneration, including neuronal survival, neurite, and axonal outgrowth (35).
Gene overlap between cerebellar Magenta and medulla Brown WGCNA modules. Venn diagram depicting gene overlap between the cerebellar Magenta and medulla Brown WGCNA modules for genes in common between both analyses. The overlap of 65 genes is significant at P < 4.61E-05. The top IPA canonical pathways for each module and the overlapping genes are listed. While no canonical pathways were significant for the overlapping gene set with Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple tests, the top canonical pathway in the uncorrected analysis is shown.
Finally, the cerebellar Magenta WGCNA module is significantly enriched for genes having a CIC-binding site within their upstream region (25). This is an important aspect of the Magenta module that further links this module to pathogenesis in the cerebellum. Formation of the ATXN1/CIC complex is critical for polyglutamine-expanded ATXN1-mediated toxicity in Purkinje cells (36). In contrast, the upstream regions of the 1,510 genes in the medulla Brown module were far less enriched for the transcriptional regulator CIC-binding sites than the Magenta genes (Table 1). Taken together, we concluded that the cerebellar Magenta and medulla Brown disease–associated WGCNA modules represent distinct gene coexpression networks, suggesting that the pathogenic pathways differ considerably between the cerebellum and medulla.
Pons WGCNA in Atxn1154Q/2Q mice. Application of WGCNA to the pons RNA-seq data set yielded 4 WGCNA modules with a significant correlation with disease, with disease-associated significances of P = 10–2 to 10–3; these were much lower than the level of significance for disease association seen with either the cerebellar Magenta module (P = 10–9; ref 24) or the Brown medulla module (P = 10–8; this study). Thus, Atxn1[154Q]-mediated disease in the mouse pons did not manifest with a distinct set of coexpressed genes robustly linked to disease. A likely explanation for the absence of a disease-associated coexpressed gene network in the mouse pons is that the relative amount of the area typically affected in SCA1, the basal pons, is only a small fraction of what is present in the human pons. Pontine pathology, when present in human SCA1, typically involves the basal pontine nuclei and their projections via the transverse fibers to the cerebellar cortex (29). In the human brain, the majority of the pons (up to 75%–80%) is composed of the basal pontine region (Supplemental Figure 6A). The cross-sectional area of the basal pons in the mouse is only 10%–15% of the total pontine region (Supplemental Figure 6B), most of which is composed of tegmental structures. In mice, the relative amount of the area of pons that would be typically affected in SCA1 is a small fraction of what is present in humans, providing a biological basis for the inability to identify a disease-associated WGCNA coexpression gene network in the pons of Atxn1154Q/2Q mice.
The inability to detect disease-associated coexpression gene networks in the pons when the pontes of Atxn1154Q/2Q mice showed numerous alterations in gene expression that were decreased with ASO353 administration, as shown by differential gene analysis, seems contradictory. Recently, Al-Ramahi et al. performed a high-throughput functional analysis of transcriptional changes using a Drosophila HD model (37), screening 312 genes that are dysregulated both in patients and mouse models of HD. In addition to finding transcriptional changes that are drivers of disease or compensatory changes, they showed that a majority of alterations in gene expression, 230 of the 312 genes, had no consequence at all. Thus, we suggest that even a greater proportion of the numerous transcriptional changes in pontes of Atxn1154Q/2Q mice, a region of the mouse CNS that lacks the anatomical portion affected by SCA1, likely fall into the nonconsequential category described by Al-Ramahi et al. (37).
Neurochemical response to ASO treatment in Atxn1154Q/2Q mice. Previously, we demonstrated that MRS accurately reflected recovery of cerebellar pathology in a conditional transgenic mouse model of ATXN1[82Q]-induced cerebellar disease (10,11). Consequently, MRS was examined for its ability to detect ASO treatment effects on neurochemicals in the cerebella and brainstems in Atxn1154Q/2Q mice. High-quality MR spectra (Figure 7, A and D) yielded 16 reliably quantified metabolites in both regions (Supplemental Figure 7). Of the 65 mice scanned, 2 mice were identified as having the abnormal high-glutamine phenotype, a consequence of portosystemic shunting in C57BL/6 mice that was previously described (38, 39). The MR spectra of these 2 mice were not included in the final analysis. Differences in cerebellar taurine (Tau, an osmolyte, neuromodulator, and neuroprotectant; ref. 40), total choline (tCho, potential marker of disturbances in membrane phospholipid metabolism), total creatine (an energy metabolism or glial marker), and glutamine (a potential glial or osmolytic marker) in Atxn1154Q/2Q mice compared with WT mice at 18 and 28 weeks (Supplemental Figure 7, A and C) matched previously described findings in this mouse line (39). In addition, lower N-acetylaspartylglutamate (NAA, a neuronal marker) (41), total NAA (tNAA), and myo-inositol (Ins, potential glial or osmolytic marker) levels were detected in the cerebellum at both 18 and 28 weeks, and lower glutamate (a neurotransmitter) was detected at 28 weeks in the vehicle-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q group versus the WT group (P < 0.05). ASO treatment reversed the Ins and tCho abnormality in the cerebella of Atxn1154Q/2Q mice at 18 weeks (Figure 7B), while reversal was partial at 28 weeks (P < 0.05 at both ages and for both metabolites) (Figure 7C). A subset of the cerebellar neurochemical abnormalities was also detected in the brainstems of Atxn1154Q/2Q mice versus WT mice, including lower NAA, tNAA, tCho, Ins, and Tau (Supplemental Figure 7, B and D). Of these, lower Ins levels were fully reversed with ASO treatment at 18 weeks (Figure 7E) and partially reversed at 28 weeks (Figure 7F).
ASO treatment effects on neurochemicals in the cerebella and brainstems in Atxn1154Q/2Q mice. (A and D) Voxel placement and spectral quality in the cerebellum and brainstem. T2-weighted images and localized proton MR spectra (LASER, TE = 15 ms, TR = 5 s) are shown for an ASO353-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mouse. (B, C, E, and F) Myo-inositol (Ins) and total choline (tCho) concentrations in the cerebella (B and C) and brainstems (E and F) of ASO353-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice, vehicle-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice, and vehicle-treated WT mice at 18 and 28 weeks of age. Sample sizes in B and E are as follows: ASO-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice (n = 11), vehicle-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice (n = 12), and WT mice (n = 11). Sample sizes in C and F are as follows: ASO-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice (n = 16), vehicle-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice (n = 15), and WT mice (n = 15). In the box-and-whisker plots, the bounds of the boxes represent 25th to 75th percentiles, the line in the box is the median, and the whiskers extend to the minimum and maximum values. Group means for neurochemical concentrations were compared with 1-way ANOVA, and P values were corrected for multiple comparisons using the Tukey Method. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.
In this study, we found that a single i.c.v. bolus injection of an ASO-targeting mouse Atxn1 RNA resulted in significant reduction in motor deficits as well as prolonged survival of Atxn1154Q/2Q mice. Injection of ASO353 at 5 weeks of age resulted in substantial improvement of motor performance on the balance beam and accelerating rotarod, while an injection at 8–9 weeks of age yielded an improvement on the balance beam, without improved performance on the accelerating rotarod. These latter results are consistent with the conditional model of ATXN1[82Q]-induced Purkinje cell disease, where the degree of reduction in motor deficits was age dependent (9). The Atxn1 RNA-targeting ASO353 results in Atxn1154Q/2Q mice add to the growing potential of ASO therapy for dominantly inherited diseases (18), including other polyglutamine diseases, such as HD (28), SCA2, and SCA3 (20, 21).
Analyses of transcriptomic data from the ASO353-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice supports three key conclusions. First, in contrast to the WGCNA results from RNA-seq data from the cerebellum and medulla (see below), the inability to detect a disease-associated WGCNA coexpression gene network in the pontes of Atxn1154Q/2Q mice reinforces the usefulness of the WGCNA strategy as a means of identifying gene expression changes associated with a SCA1-like phenotype.
Second, we found that the WGCN Magenta module gene set derived from cerebellar RNA-seq data from mice, in which expression of ATXN1[82Q] is restricted to Purkinje cells, significantly overlapped with cerebellar DE genes that were corrected to WT expression in the cerebella of ASO353-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice. In addition, the GSEA of the Magenta module comparing the list of cerebellar DE genes from cerebella of 18 week-old WT vehicle-treated mice with Atxn1154Q/2Q vehicle-treated mice indicated that the Magenta module highly correlates with cerebellar disease in Atxn1154Q/2Q mice. Thus, we conclude that cerebellar disease in Atxn1154Q/2Q mice is largely driven by effects of expanded ATXN1 on Purkinje cells.
Third, RNA-seq data from ASO353-treated Atxn1154Q/2Q mice indicates that the disease processes in the cerebellum that underlie ataxia differ considerably from those in the medulla that presumably contribute to the shortened life span seen in SCA1. While there appears to be some overlap in the effect of expanded ATXN1 on gene expression in the cerebellum and medulla, key features of gene expression changes in the medulla support the concept that seminal differences in disease processes exist between the medulla and the cerebellum. As measured by alterations in gene expression, onset of disease is delayed considerably in the medulla compared with the cerebellum. At 18 weeks of age, Atxn1154Q/2Q mice showed no signs of altered gene expression in the medulla, while a substantial number of DE genes were detectable in the cerebella of Atxn1154Q/2Q mice at the same age. By 28 weeks of age, DE genes were detectable in the medullae of Atxn1154Q/2Q mice.
As assessed by WGCNA analyses of altered gene expression in Atxn1154Q/2Q mice, genes within the medulla Brown coexpression module have little overlap with the cerebellar Magenta module. In addition, the cerebellar Magenta module is enriched for genes whose expression is regulated by the ATXN1-interacting transcription factor CIC (25). Importantly, the ability of expanded ATXN1 to interact with CIC is critical for it to induce disease in Purkinje cells (36). In contrast to the cerebellar Magenta gene network, the medulla Brown module is only significantly enriched for genes with 1 of the 2 CIC-binding site motifs in their upstream regions and far less significantly enriched than the Magenta module. Thus, genes in the medulla Brown module are unlikely to be regulated by CIC, suggesting that the interaction of ATXN1 with CIC is not a major driver of disease in the medulla. This conclusion is consistent with the finding that, while loss of CIC function has a major effect on reducing cerebellar motor phenotypes, it has far less of an effect on extending life span in Atxn1154Q/2Q mice (42). Future work looking at the extent to which additional ATXN1 interactors mediate neurodegeneration in the medulla will be critical for therapeutic considerations going forward.
The MRS findings were largely consistent with the analyses of transcriptomic data. First, we detected a smaller number of neurochemical abnormalities and a more limited ASO response in the brainstems of the Atxn1154Q/2Q mice than in the cerebella at both 18 and 28 weeks. This is likely due to partial volume effects, namely the brainstem volume of interest (VOI) contained both pontine and medullary tissue (Figure 7D). Additionally, a small fraction of the pons is affected by SCA1 in the Atxn1154Q/2Q mice, as also shown by the lack of a disease-associated WGCNA coexpression gene network in the pons. In contrast, the majority of the pons is affected in patients with SCA1. Consistently, pontine neurochemicals show strong correlations with clinical status (6) and pons volume measured by MRI is the most sensitive structural measure to change in patients with SCA1 (31). Therefore, MRS of the pons is still expected to be sensitive to treatment effects in human subjects undergoing gene-silencing therapies. Second, similar to the gene expression findings, onset of neurochemical abnormalities was delayed in the brainstem compared with the onset in the cerebellum. At 18 weeks of age, while numerous neurochemical levels were abnormal in the cerebellum (Supplemental Figure 7A), Atxn1154Q/2Q mice showed minimal neurochemical abnormalities in the brainstem (Supplemental Figure 7B). By 28 weeks of age, a substantially larger number of neurochemical differences were detectable in the brainstems of Atxn1154Q/2Q mice, while still fewer than those detected in the cerebella (Supplemental Figure 7, C and D). The limited and delayed pathology in the tissue covered by the brainstem VOI likely resulted in the limited neurochemical response to a single ASO injection administered at 5 weeks.
Notably, the classic markers of neuronal health, NAA and glutamate, were unaffected by ASO treatment. Instead, two neurochemicals that represent early biochemical changes prior to gross degenerative pathology (39, 43), namely Ins and tCho, were fully or partially rescued at 18 and 28 weeks of age following ASO treatment. Of these, increased Ins is typically considered a marker of gliosis (41). Because we detected lower rather than higher Ins levels in the Atxn1154Q/2Q versus WT mice, this neurochemical abnormality likely reflects an osmolytic imbalance in these mice. Consequently, the increase in Ins following ASO injection is likely related to osmolytic effects of the treatment. Similarly, increased levels of tCho are typically associated with increased membrane turnover (44). Therefore, the lower tCho levels detected in Atxn1154Q/2Q mice compared with WT more likely reflect disturbances in membrane phospholipid metabolism (45), which are likely rescued with ASO treatment.
Importantly, this work provides proof of concept for the ability of an ATXN1-targeting ASO to rescue two seminal SCA1 phenotypes: ataxia and premature lethality. In addition, the data indicate that regional differences in disease processes between the cerebellum and medulla are large enough that a therapy designed to target a specific cellular pathogenic pathway active in one region is unlikely to substantially effect disease in the other. These findings further support the therapeutic value of an approach such as ASO-mediated reduction of ATXN1 RNA, which is effective across multiple regions of the brain and the corresponding cellular pathways affected by SCA1.
Mice. All mice were housed and managed by Research Animal Resources under specific pathogen–free conditions in an Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International–approved facility. In all experiments, equal numbers of male and female mice were used. For tissue analyses, mice were harvested via CO2 euthanasia and brains were dissected to isolate the cortex, cerebellum, pons, and brainstem. Each region was divided in half and frozen in liquid nitrogen. For i.c.v. injections, mice were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal ketamine/xylazine cocktail (100 mg/kg ketamine and 10 mg/kg xylazine). Using a stereotax, the cranium was burr drilled and a Hamilton Neuros Syringe (65460-05) was positioned at the following coordinates: AP, 0.3; ML, 1.0; DV, –2.7 mm from bregma. Injections of 10 μl ASO 618353 (50 μg/μl) dissolved in PBS without Ca/Mg (Gibco, 14190) or vehicle were delivered via a micro-syringe pump at 25 nl/s. Immediate postoperative care included subcutaneous delivery of 250 μl saline, carprofen (7 mg/kg) and Buprenorphine SR (Zoopharm Pharmacy) (2 mg/kg).
Western blots. One half of each brain region from each mouse was homogenized using a tissue grinder and 250 μl Tris Triton lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5% Triton X-100) that included MilliporeSigma protease inhibitors II (P5726) and III (P0044) and a Roche Complete Mini Protease inhibitor tablet (11836170001). Homogenized samples were shaken 1,500 rpm at 4°C for 30 minutes and then frozen and thawed in liquid nitrogen and 37°C 3 times, followed by 15,000 g centrifugation for 10 minutes. 30 μg protein was boiled in Laemmli loading buffer and run on a 4%–20% Bio-Rad precast gel (5671094). Protein was transferred to a nitrocellulose Bio-Rad Transblot Turbo kit (170-4271). Blots were blocked room temperature for 30 minutes in 5% milk/PBS-T. Blots were probed overnight at 4°C, 1:1,000, with the ATXN1 antibody 11NQ (46) or 12NQ (47) or 1:5,000 Tubulin (MilliporeSigma, A4700). Blots were washed with PBS-T 3 times and then placed in 5% milk PBS-T plus 1:2,500 species-specific HRP antibodies. (GE NXA931, NA9340V). Blots were washed with PBS-T 3 times, followed by Super Signal West Pico (Thermo, 34078), and imaged on an ImageQuant LAS 4000.
Laser microdissection. One half the cerebellum from each mouse was mounted in Tissue-Tek OCT medium (Sakura Finetek) and frozen using liquid nitrogen. Tissue was cut into 20-μm sections and mounted on PEN-Membrane slides (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Mounted tissue was stained using cresyl violet. Subsections of tissue slices were collected using a Leica LMD6500 Laser Dissections Microscope. Isolated tissue samples were transferred to Qiazol lysis buffer (Qiagen) for analysis via RT qPCR and Western blot.
RT-qPCR. One half of each brain region from each mouse was homogenized in 500 μl Trizol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 15596026). RNA isolation was done per the manufacture’s instructions. cDNA was synthesized in duplicate using 500 ng RNA in 10 μl iScript ADV (172-5038) reactions and then diluted 1:5 in water. qPCR was performed using 2 μl cDNA in 10 μl Roche Probes Master (04707494001) reactions on a Roche 480 Lightcycler. The target gene, mAtxn1, NM_009124 (CACGGTCATTCAGACCACACA, GGTAGCCGATGACAGGAGGTT and probe FAM-CAGCCACGG/ZEN/CCTTCTACGCTGG/3IABKFQ/) and reference gene, Roche mGAPD(05046211001), reactions were amplified in separate wells under cycling conditions: 95°C for 10 seconds, 60°C for 20 seconds for 35 cycles. Cq values were determined using the Roche Second Derivative Max calculation. Relative quantification was done using standard 2Cq.
Immunofluorescence. Mice were deeply anesthetized and transcardially perfused with 10% buffered formalin, and 50-micron sections were cut on a vibratome. Epitopes were unmasked by boiling 3 times for 15 seconds each in 0.01 M urea. The sections were blocked for 1 hour in 2% normal donkey serum, 0.3% Triton X-100 in 1× PBS. After blocking, the sections were incubated for 48 hours at 4°C in blocking buffer with rabbit anti-ASO (1:10,000, Ionis), goat anti-calbindin (1:250, SC-7691, Santa Cruz), and mouse anti-NeuN (1:200, MAB377, Millipore). The sections were washed 4 times in PBS and incubated for 24 hours in blocking solution containing secondary antibody. Donkey secondary Alexa Fluor 488, Cy3, and Alexa Fluor 647 were used at 1:500 (Jackson Immunoresearch). Fluorescent images were scanned using an Olympus Fluoview 1000 IX2 inverted microscope.
Behavioral analyses — rotarod. Mice were tested on the rotarod apparatus (Ugo Basile) using an accelerating protocol: 5–50 rpm, 5-minute ramp duration, 5-minute maximum trial length. The test consisted of a total of 4 trials per day for 4 consecutive days. Mice were habituated to the testing room 15 minutes prior to the start of testing on each day. Animals were segregated by sex during testing and run in consistent groups (up to 5 at a time). To ensure enough recovery time between trials, animals were given 10–15 minutes between the end of a trial and the following trial, which included the time to test the other groups in the trial. Trials ended whenever an animal failed to stay on the rotarod or if they made 2 consecutive rotations clinging to the rod and not ambulating. Animals were returned to their home cages after trial completion. The apparatus was cleaned between each animal group within a trial with a 70% ethanol.
Behavioral analyses — beam walk. The beam walk protocol consisted of 3 consecutive training days, followed by 1 test day. The beam walk apparatus was built in-house by the Mouse Behavior Core using wood and plastic components, consisting of beams (of varying sizes and shapes) that extended to a goal box. The apparatus was elevated approximately 50 cm off a table surface. Testing was performed in a dark room with a single light directed at the start position of the beam to encourage crossing to the goal box. Males and females were segregated during testing. Animals were run at approximately the same time every day and habituated to the behavior room for about 15 minutes prior to the start of training. At the start of the first trial of each day, an animal was placed into the goal box for approximately 15–30 seconds to become familiar before beginning the first trial. After familiarization with the goal box, the mouse was brought to the start end of the beam and placed with the nose right behind the “start” line. Beam walk training (using the 15-mm square beam) consisted of 4 trials per day, with a maximum of 60 seconds allowed for an animal to cross. Animals were tested in smaller groups of 4–7 to allow for approximately 5-minute intertrial intervals. Hind paw foot slips and time(s) to cross the beam were recorded by an investigator blind to treatment and genotype. A foot slip was defined as a hind leg and paw coming completely off the beam in a fast downward sweeping motion. Animals that successfully crossed the beam were left in the goal box for approximately 15 seconds while the beam was wiped down with a 70% ethanol solution. The animal was then returned to their home cage until the next trial. The goal platform was cleaned with the ethanol solution after each trial and between animals on the first trial of each day. On the test day, 6 beams of decreasing size (either square or round) and increasing difficulty were used with only 2 trials of each. The beam order on test day was (a) 25 mm (diameter), square; (b) 25 mm, round; (c) 16 mm, square; (d) 19 mm, round; (e) 10 mm, square; and (f) 10 mm, round.
RNA isolation and sequencing. Total RNA was isolated from dissected cerebella (4 samples each of WT vehicle, Sca1154Q/2Q, and Sca1154Q/2Q with ASO treatment at 18 weeks), pontes (3 samples each at 18 weeks and 4 samples each at 28 weeks of WT vehicle, Sca1154Q/2Q, and Sca1154Q/2Q with ASO treatment), and medullae (3 samples each at 18 weeks and 8, 8, and 7 samples, respectively, at 28 weeks of WT vehicle, Sca1154Q/2Q, and Sca1154Q/2Q with ASO treatment; see Supplemental Table 1) using TRIzol Reagent (Life Technologies) following the manufacturer’s protocols. Tissue was homogenized using RNase-Free Disposable Pellet Pestles (Fisher Scientific) in a motorized chuck. For RNA-seq, RNA was further purified to remove any organic carryover using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s RNA Cleanup protocol. Purified RNA was sent to the University of Minnesota Genomics Center for quality control, including quantification using fluorimetry (RiboGreen assay, Life Technologies), and RNA integrity was assessed with capillary electrophoresis (Agilent BioAnalyzer 2100, Agilent Technologies Inc.), generating an RNA integrity number (RIN). All submitted samples had greater than 1 μg total mass and RINs 7.9 or greater. Library creation was completed using oligo-dT purification of polyadenylated RNA, which was reverse transcribed to create cDNA. cDNA was fragmented, blunt ended, and ligated to barcoded adaptors. Library was size selected to 320 bp ±5% to produce average inserts of approximately 200 bp, and size distribution validated using capillary electrophoresis and quantified using fluorimetry (PicoGreen, Life Technologies) and qPCR. Libraries were then normalized, pooled, and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 using a 100-nt paired-end read strategy. Data were stored and maintained on University of Minnesota Supercomputing Institute Servers. Reads were aligned to the mouse reference genome (GRcm38) with hisat2 (48) using default parameters for stranded libraries, the hisat2 GRCm38 index for the genome plus SNPs, and transcripts and using Ensembl’s release 87 of the GRCm38 gene annotations. Read counts per gene were summed using featureCounts from the subread package (49). Genes less than about 300 bp are too small to be accurately captured in standard RNA-seq library preparations, so they were discarded from downstream analyses. Differential expression analysis was carried out using the R package DESeq2 (50). The medulla samples were collected and sequenced in two batches, and batch effect was corrected in the model for differential expression analysis. Genes with a FDR value of less than or equal to 0.05 were considered significant. GSEA (v3.0) was used to test for enrichment of Magenta module genes in cerebellum and medulla data using a preranked test. For both data sets, genes were ranked by –log10(P value) using WT vehicle versus SCA ASO–treated differential expression comparison, with the sign of the fold change assigned to the ranking metric, i.e., if the fold change was negative, the ranking metric was –1 × (–log10[P value]).
WGCNA. Read abundances for 28-week medulla samples were filtered to keep only the 16,344 genes that had at least 50 reads in at least 7 samples (the size of the smallest treatment group) and were then normalized with a variance stabilizing transformation in DESeq2 for WGCNA analysis (51, 52). The WGCNA R package (v. 1.51) was used to construct an unsigned gene coexpression network with a soft threshold power [β] of 15, which resulted in 13,029 of the genes assigned to 20 coexpression modules. All modules were tested for significant association with disease state (WT/vehicle and Sca1154Q/2Q/ASO were considered “healthy” and Sca1154Q/2Q vehicle was considered “sick”) via t test, and P values were adjusted for multiple testing using a Benjamini-Hochberg correction. The Brown module (1,510 genes) was by far the most significantly associated with disease state (adjusted P = 9.077501E-08, 5 orders of magnitude smaller than the next most significant module). Data for the Brown module were exported to Cytoscape for visualization. The MEME suite’s FIMO tool (v. 5.0.1, ref. 53) was used to detect 2 known Capicua-binding motifs (TGAATGAA and TGAATGGA) in the 2 kb upstream of the transcription start sites of Brown module genes. These sequences were shuffled and again searched for CIC-binding sites using FIMO; a Fisher’s exact test was used to test for enrichment of CIC-binding sites in the original compared with shuffled sequences.
MRS. For MRS analyses, at 5 weeks of age, Atxn1154Q/2Q mice were treated with 1 i.c.v. injection of ASO or vehicle solution; WT C57/Bl6 littermates received 1 injection of vehicle solution. At 18 (N = 11–12 per each of the 3 groups) and 28 weeks (N = 15–16 per group), mice underwent in vivo, single-voxel MRS of the cerebellum and brainstem at 9.4 tesla (T). Mice used for MRS were housed, 2–4 animals per cage, in a specific pathogen–free facility with a 12-hour-light/dark cycle. They were provided standard food and water ad libitum. MRS data were acquired and analyzed in a blind fashion with respect to the group of animals. For MR scanning, mice were induced with 3% isoflurane in a 50:50 mixture of O2/N2O, and anesthesia was maintained with 1.3%–1.5% isoflurane for the duration of the procedure. Mice were secured in a holder and positioned inside the 9.4 T magnet for MR measurement. Body temperature was maintained at 37°C using a circulating warm water bath and a heating fan controlled by feedback from a fiber-optic rectal thermometer. After each measurement, animals were placed in a recovery cage until they were fully awake before they were returned to their home cage. Following recovery from the final scan, mice were euthanized via carbon dioxide asphyxiation, and brain tissue was harvested for RNA analysis. A quadrature surface coil and a horizontal 9.4 T magnet (Agilent) were used to acquire MRS measurements according to methods previously described (11, 43). VOIs for the MRS measurement were selected using coronal and sagittal images acquired with a rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequence (repetition time [TR] = 4 s; echo train length = 8; echo time (TE) = 60 ms; slice thickness = 1 mm). First- and second-order shims were adjusted for each VOI using FASTMAP with echo-planar readout (54). Proton MR spectra were acquired with a short-echo LASER sequence (55) (TE = 15 ms; TR = 5 s; 128 transients) from a cerebellar VOI (2.1 × 1.8 × 1.8 mm3; 6.8 μl) and a brainstem VOI (4.3 × 1.8 × 1.6 mm3; 12.4 μl). Spectra were saved as single shots to enable frequency and phase correction. Unsuppressed water spectra were acquired from the same VOI as a metabolite quantification reference. For metabolite quantification, single shots were eddy current, frequency, and phase corrected using MRspa software (http://www.cmrr.umn.edu/downloads/mrspa/) before summation. Spectra were quantified using LCModel 6.3-0G (56) with the water-scaling option using 19 basis spectra, which were simulated using density matrix formalism (57) based on previously reported chemical shifts and coupling constants (58, 59). Concentrations with mean Cramér-Rao lower bounds ≤20% at either 18 or 28 weeks for a given treatment group were reported. Metabolites with strong correlations (r < –0.7) in the majority of the spectra, specifically Cr and PCr as well as Cho and PCho, were reported as the sums of total creatine and tCho. Group means were compared with 1-way ANOVA and the Tukey Method for multiple comparisons.
Statistics. qPCR, RNA-seq, and motor performance data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software (version 7.03) and R (version 3.3.3). Significant differences were based on t test, Fisher’s exact test, or 1- or 2-way ANOVA, followed by a Bonferroni, Tukey, or Dunnett post hoc test or a Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple testing, depending on the analysis (see figure legends). DE genes were determined using DESeq2 (v.1.14.1). P < 0.05 (or adjusted P < 0.05, in appropriate cases) was considered as statistically significant. Significance of mouse survival, plotted as Kaplan-Meyer curves, was assessed using log-rank Mantel-Cox and Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon tests. Neurochemical profile data are expressed as the mean ± 1.96 × SEM (95% CI). Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software (version 7.03). Group means for neurochemical concentrations were compared with 1-way ANOVA, and P values corrected for multiple comparisons using the Tukey Method. P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Study approval. The University of Minnesota Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved all animal procedures.
JF, HBK, GÖ, and HTO conceived the studies. HBK, HYZ, HBC, GÖ, SL, and HTO reviewed the data and wrote and edited the paper. HBK and EES performed initial ASO screens. JF, BH, and BO performed ASO i.c.v. injections. JF, BO, EES, HPH, CW, LD, ZC, and JPO generated reagents and performed biochemical characterization of mice. MB and TNM performed behavioral analyses. GÖ and SL performed MRS studies and analyzed MRS data. CH performed RNA-seq analyses. OR and PY bred and genotyped all mice.
This work was supported by a grant from the NIH/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NIH/NINDS) (R37 NS022920), a National Ataxia Foundation Pioneer Award, and a Wallin Neuroscience Discovery Award to HTO and a grant from NIH/NINDS (R37NS027699) and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute to HYZ. Additional support was received from the Jay D. Schlueter Ataxia Research Fund. The Center for Magnetic Resonance Research is supported by the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (grant P41 EB015894), the Institutional Center Cores for Advanced Neuroimaging (award P30 NS076408), and the W.M. Keck Foundation. The authors wish to thank the Biomedical Genomics Center and Mouse Phenotyping Core at the University of Minnesota. It is with the deepest degree of respect and sadness that the authors dedicate this work to the memory of Jill Friedrich, our colleague and friend, who died in August 2017 from injuries sustained in a biking accident.
Address correspondence to: Harry T. Orr, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, 2101 6th Street SE, Delivery Code 2641B, 3110 WMBB, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. Phone: 612.625.3647; Email: orrxx002@umn.edu.
Conflict of interest: HBK and EES have equity in and are employed by Ionis Pharmaceuticals, which is developing an ASO-based drug for SCA1.
License: Copyright 2018, American Society for Clinical Investigation.
Reference information: JCI Insight. 2018;3(21):e123193. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.123193.