Clinical MedicineImmunology Free access | 10.1172/jci.insight.98960
1Intensive Care Unit, and
2Inserm CIC-1435, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
3Inserm UMR-1092, University of Limoges, Limoges, France.
4Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
5Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
6Cellular Immunology Laboratory, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
7EA 7426 PI3 “Pathophysiology of Injury-induced Immunosuppression”, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I-Biomérieux-Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
8Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
9Revimmune SAS, Paris, France.
10Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
11Cytokines and Immunity Section, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
12Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
13Department of Medicine, and
14Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Hotchkiss, Departments of Anesthesiology, Medicine, and Surgery; 660 South Euclid Avenue, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. Phone: 314.362.8552; Email: hotch@wustl.edu.
Find articles by Francois, B. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Intensive Care Unit, and
2Inserm CIC-1435, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
3Inserm UMR-1092, University of Limoges, Limoges, France.
4Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
5Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
6Cellular Immunology Laboratory, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
7EA 7426 PI3 “Pathophysiology of Injury-induced Immunosuppression”, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I-Biomérieux-Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
8Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
9Revimmune SAS, Paris, France.
10Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
11Cytokines and Immunity Section, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
12Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
13Department of Medicine, and
14Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Hotchkiss, Departments of Anesthesiology, Medicine, and Surgery; 660 South Euclid Avenue, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. Phone: 314.362.8552; Email: hotch@wustl.edu.
Find articles by Jeannet, R. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
1Intensive Care Unit, and
2Inserm CIC-1435, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
3Inserm UMR-1092, University of Limoges, Limoges, France.
4Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
5Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
6Cellular Immunology Laboratory, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
7EA 7426 PI3 “Pathophysiology of Injury-induced Immunosuppression”, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I-Biomérieux-Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
8Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
9Revimmune SAS, Paris, France.
10Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
11Cytokines and Immunity Section, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
12Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
13Department of Medicine, and
14Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Hotchkiss, Departments of Anesthesiology, Medicine, and Surgery; 660 South Euclid Avenue, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. Phone: 314.362.8552; Email: hotch@wustl.edu.
Find articles by Daix, T. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Intensive Care Unit, and
2Inserm CIC-1435, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
3Inserm UMR-1092, University of Limoges, Limoges, France.
4Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
5Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
6Cellular Immunology Laboratory, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
7EA 7426 PI3 “Pathophysiology of Injury-induced Immunosuppression”, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I-Biomérieux-Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
8Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
9Revimmune SAS, Paris, France.
10Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
11Cytokines and Immunity Section, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
12Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
13Department of Medicine, and
14Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Hotchkiss, Departments of Anesthesiology, Medicine, and Surgery; 660 South Euclid Avenue, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. Phone: 314.362.8552; Email: hotch@wustl.edu.
Find articles by Walton, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Intensive Care Unit, and
2Inserm CIC-1435, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
3Inserm UMR-1092, University of Limoges, Limoges, France.
4Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
5Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
6Cellular Immunology Laboratory, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
7EA 7426 PI3 “Pathophysiology of Injury-induced Immunosuppression”, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I-Biomérieux-Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
8Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
9Revimmune SAS, Paris, France.
10Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
11Cytokines and Immunity Section, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
12Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
13Department of Medicine, and
14Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Hotchkiss, Departments of Anesthesiology, Medicine, and Surgery; 660 South Euclid Avenue, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. Phone: 314.362.8552; Email: hotch@wustl.edu.
Find articles by Shotwell, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Intensive Care Unit, and
2Inserm CIC-1435, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
3Inserm UMR-1092, University of Limoges, Limoges, France.
4Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
5Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
6Cellular Immunology Laboratory, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
7EA 7426 PI3 “Pathophysiology of Injury-induced Immunosuppression”, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I-Biomérieux-Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
8Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
9Revimmune SAS, Paris, France.
10Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
11Cytokines and Immunity Section, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
12Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
13Department of Medicine, and
14Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Hotchkiss, Departments of Anesthesiology, Medicine, and Surgery; 660 South Euclid Avenue, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. Phone: 314.362.8552; Email: hotch@wustl.edu.
Find articles by Unsinger, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Intensive Care Unit, and
2Inserm CIC-1435, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
3Inserm UMR-1092, University of Limoges, Limoges, France.
4Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
5Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
6Cellular Immunology Laboratory, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
7EA 7426 PI3 “Pathophysiology of Injury-induced Immunosuppression”, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I-Biomérieux-Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
8Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
9Revimmune SAS, Paris, France.
10Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
11Cytokines and Immunity Section, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
12Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
13Department of Medicine, and
14Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Hotchkiss, Departments of Anesthesiology, Medicine, and Surgery; 660 South Euclid Avenue, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. Phone: 314.362.8552; Email: hotch@wustl.edu.
Find articles by Monneret, G. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
1Intensive Care Unit, and
2Inserm CIC-1435, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
3Inserm UMR-1092, University of Limoges, Limoges, France.
4Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
5Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
6Cellular Immunology Laboratory, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
7EA 7426 PI3 “Pathophysiology of Injury-induced Immunosuppression”, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I-Biomérieux-Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
8Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
9Revimmune SAS, Paris, France.
10Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
11Cytokines and Immunity Section, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
12Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
13Department of Medicine, and
14Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Hotchkiss, Departments of Anesthesiology, Medicine, and Surgery; 660 South Euclid Avenue, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. Phone: 314.362.8552; Email: hotch@wustl.edu.
Find articles by Rimmelé, T. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Intensive Care Unit, and
2Inserm CIC-1435, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
3Inserm UMR-1092, University of Limoges, Limoges, France.
4Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
5Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
6Cellular Immunology Laboratory, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
7EA 7426 PI3 “Pathophysiology of Injury-induced Immunosuppression”, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I-Biomérieux-Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
8Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
9Revimmune SAS, Paris, France.
10Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
11Cytokines and Immunity Section, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
12Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
13Department of Medicine, and
14Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Hotchkiss, Departments of Anesthesiology, Medicine, and Surgery; 660 South Euclid Avenue, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. Phone: 314.362.8552; Email: hotch@wustl.edu.
Find articles by Blood, T. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Intensive Care Unit, and
2Inserm CIC-1435, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
3Inserm UMR-1092, University of Limoges, Limoges, France.
4Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
5Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
6Cellular Immunology Laboratory, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
7EA 7426 PI3 “Pathophysiology of Injury-induced Immunosuppression”, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I-Biomérieux-Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
8Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
9Revimmune SAS, Paris, France.
10Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
11Cytokines and Immunity Section, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
12Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
13Department of Medicine, and
14Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Hotchkiss, Departments of Anesthesiology, Medicine, and Surgery; 660 South Euclid Avenue, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. Phone: 314.362.8552; Email: hotch@wustl.edu.
Find articles by Morre, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Intensive Care Unit, and
2Inserm CIC-1435, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
3Inserm UMR-1092, University of Limoges, Limoges, France.
4Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
5Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
6Cellular Immunology Laboratory, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
7EA 7426 PI3 “Pathophysiology of Injury-induced Immunosuppression”, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I-Biomérieux-Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
8Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
9Revimmune SAS, Paris, France.
10Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
11Cytokines and Immunity Section, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
12Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
13Department of Medicine, and
14Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Hotchkiss, Departments of Anesthesiology, Medicine, and Surgery; 660 South Euclid Avenue, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. Phone: 314.362.8552; Email: hotch@wustl.edu.
Find articles by Gregoire, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Intensive Care Unit, and
2Inserm CIC-1435, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
3Inserm UMR-1092, University of Limoges, Limoges, France.
4Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
5Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
6Cellular Immunology Laboratory, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
7EA 7426 PI3 “Pathophysiology of Injury-induced Immunosuppression”, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I-Biomérieux-Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
8Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
9Revimmune SAS, Paris, France.
10Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
11Cytokines and Immunity Section, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
12Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
13Department of Medicine, and
14Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Hotchkiss, Departments of Anesthesiology, Medicine, and Surgery; 660 South Euclid Avenue, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. Phone: 314.362.8552; Email: hotch@wustl.edu.
Find articles by Mayo, G. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Intensive Care Unit, and
2Inserm CIC-1435, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
3Inserm UMR-1092, University of Limoges, Limoges, France.
4Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
5Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
6Cellular Immunology Laboratory, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
7EA 7426 PI3 “Pathophysiology of Injury-induced Immunosuppression”, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I-Biomérieux-Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
8Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
9Revimmune SAS, Paris, France.
10Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
11Cytokines and Immunity Section, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
12Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
13Department of Medicine, and
14Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Hotchkiss, Departments of Anesthesiology, Medicine, and Surgery; 660 South Euclid Avenue, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. Phone: 314.362.8552; Email: hotch@wustl.edu.
Find articles by Blood, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Intensive Care Unit, and
2Inserm CIC-1435, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
3Inserm UMR-1092, University of Limoges, Limoges, France.
4Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
5Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
6Cellular Immunology Laboratory, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
7EA 7426 PI3 “Pathophysiology of Injury-induced Immunosuppression”, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I-Biomérieux-Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
8Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
9Revimmune SAS, Paris, France.
10Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
11Cytokines and Immunity Section, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
12Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
13Department of Medicine, and
14Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Hotchkiss, Departments of Anesthesiology, Medicine, and Surgery; 660 South Euclid Avenue, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. Phone: 314.362.8552; Email: hotch@wustl.edu.
Find articles by Durum, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Intensive Care Unit, and
2Inserm CIC-1435, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
3Inserm UMR-1092, University of Limoges, Limoges, France.
4Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
5Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
6Cellular Immunology Laboratory, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
7EA 7426 PI3 “Pathophysiology of Injury-induced Immunosuppression”, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I-Biomérieux-Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
8Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
9Revimmune SAS, Paris, France.
10Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
11Cytokines and Immunity Section, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
12Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
13Department of Medicine, and
14Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Hotchkiss, Departments of Anesthesiology, Medicine, and Surgery; 660 South Euclid Avenue, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. Phone: 314.362.8552; Email: hotch@wustl.edu.
Find articles by Sherwood, E. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
1Intensive Care Unit, and
2Inserm CIC-1435, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
3Inserm UMR-1092, University of Limoges, Limoges, France.
4Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
5Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
6Cellular Immunology Laboratory, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
7EA 7426 PI3 “Pathophysiology of Injury-induced Immunosuppression”, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I-Biomérieux-Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
8Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
9Revimmune SAS, Paris, France.
10Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
11Cytokines and Immunity Section, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
12Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
13Department of Medicine, and
14Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Hotchkiss, Departments of Anesthesiology, Medicine, and Surgery; 660 South Euclid Avenue, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. Phone: 314.362.8552; Email: hotch@wustl.edu.
Find articles by Hotchkiss, R. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Published March 8, 2018 - More info
Sepsis is a life-threatening complication of infection that results in over 250,000 deaths per year in the United States. There is a strong correlation between reduced levels of lymphocytes, such as CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, and increased mortality; therefore, strategies aimed to increase these cells have therapeutic potential. The cytokine IL-7 prevents lymphocyte death, increases lymphocyte proliferation, and has been shown to improve intestinal lymphocyte counts in patients with HIV-1. In this episode, Richard Hotchkiss details the results from a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of recombinant human IL-7 in patients with septic shock and severe lymphocytopenia. IL-7 reversed the loss of lymphocytes in septic patients, suggesting that this approach be further explored.
BACKGROUND. A defining pathophysiologic feature of sepsis is profound apoptosis-induced death and depletion of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Interleukin-7 (IL-7) is an antiapoptotic common γ-chain cytokine that is essential for lymphocyte proliferation and survival. Clinical trials of IL-7 in over 390 oncologic and lymphopenic patients showed that IL-7 was safe, invariably increased CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocyte counts, and improved immunity.
METHODS. We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of recombinant human IL-7 (CYT107) in patients with septic shock and severe lymphopenia. Twenty-seven patients at academic sites in France and the United States received CYT107 or placebo for 4 weeks. Primary aims were to determine the safety of CYT107 in sepsis and its ability to reverse lymphopenia.
RESULTS. CYT107 was well tolerated without evidence of inducing cytokine storm or worsening inflammation or organ dysfunction. CYT107 caused a 3- to 4-fold increase in absolute lymphocyte counts and in circulating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells that persisted for weeks after drug administration. CYT107 also increased T cell proliferation and activation.
CONCLUSIONS. This is the first trial of an immunoadjuvant therapy targeting defects in adaptive immunity in patients with sepsis. CYT107 reversed the marked loss of CD4+ and CD8+ immune effector cells, a hallmark of sepsis and a likely key mechanism in its morbidity and mortality. CYT107 represents a potential new way forward in the treatment of patients with sepsis by restoring adaptive immunity. Such immune-based therapy should be broadly protective against diverse pathogens including multidrug resistant bacteria that preferentially target patients with impaired immunity.
TRIAL REGISTRATION. Trials registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02640807 and NCT02797431.
FUNDING. Revimmune, NIH National Institute of General Medical Sciences GM44118.
A defining feature of sepsis is a profound apoptosis-induced depletion of lymphocytes (1–4). Postmortem studies of patients who died of sepsis demonstrate extensive loss of lymphocytes in spleens, intestines, and other organs (1, 4). The tissue lymphocyte depletion occurring during sepsis is accompanied by a decrease in the absolute number of circulating lymphocytes, i.e., lymphopenia (5–8). This lymphopenia that is present in sepsis consists of the loss of many different classes of lymphocytes including CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, B cells, and natural killer cells (1, 9). CD4+ T cell counts in patients with sepsis are often as low as that occurring in patients with life-threatening AIDS (10). Lymphocytes are essential for an effective host defense against invading pathogens (11). Studies in patients who have undergone bone marrow or solid organ transplantation show a direct correlation between low CD4+ cell counts and the incidence of new onset opportunistic infections and death (12, 13). Similarly, numerous studies have shown that septic patients with more severe and persistent lymphopenia have a higher mortality compared with septic patients who are either not lymphopenic or who have a lesser degree of lymphopenia (5–8).
A key question is whether the lymphocyte depletion in sepsis is merely an epiphenomenon or whether it plays a central role in lethality in sepsis. Several mechanistic studies have addressed this critical issue. Studies by multiple independent laboratories showed that mice whose lymphocytes were resistant to sepsis-induced apoptosis because of either overexpression of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2 or deletion of the proapoptotic protein Bim have improved survival in sepsis (14–19). Furthermore, studies also demonstrate that adoptive transfer of lymphocytes that are resistant to sepsis-induced apoptosis, but not adoptive transfer of normal apoptosis-susceptible lymphocytes, improves sepsis survival (15). Collectively, these animal studies together with patient studies showing a close correlation between the degree of lymphopenia and survival strongly suggest that the extensive lymphocyte depletion is fundamental to the pathophysiology of sepsis (20, 21).
Interleukin-7 (IL-7) is a potent Bcl-2–inducing, antiapoptotic, common γ-chain cytokine that is required for lymphocyte survival and expansion (22–24). In addition to its antiapoptotic properties, IL-7 induces robust proliferation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Given its ability to prevent lymphocyte apoptosis, induce lymphocyte proliferation, and improve lymphocyte function, IL-7 has been tested by several groups in animal models of sepsis (25–27). These studies showed that IL-7 prevented lymphocyte apoptosis, restored CD4+ and CD8+ T cell function, and improved survival in animal models of bacterial and fungal sepsis (25–27). Importantly, IL-7 was also effective in preventing lymphocyte apoptosis, improving T cell cytokine production, and restoring lymphocyte metabolism in ex vivo studies conducted on peripheral blood from patients with septic shock (28, 29).
Although not currently approved for clinical use, CYT107, a glycosylated recombinant human IL-7, has been administered in clinical trials to over 390 adult and pediatric patients for a variety of disorders including HIV, idiopathic lymphopenia, cancer, hepatitis C, and bone marrow reconstitution following stem cell transplantation (30–35). In clinical trials of HIV-infected patients who had lymphopenia despite antiretroviral therapy, CYT107 caused a 2- to 4-fold dose-dependent increase in circulating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (31). CYT107 consistently increased circulating lymphocyte counts and was well tolerated, with rash being the only serious adverse effect (30–35). Recently, CYT107 was administered on a compassionate basis to patients with lymphopenia and John Cunningham (JC) virus–induced progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (36, 37). In this desperate setting, CYT107 typically increased lymphocyte counts, decreased JC viral load, and led to resolution of neurologic symptoms (36, 37).
We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb trial of CYT107 in patients with septic shock and severe lymphopenia of 900 lymphocytes/μl or lower. Clinical immunoadjuvant trials to date have targeted innate immunity. Importantly, this study represents the first immunotherapeutic trial to our knowledge focused on augmenting the adaptive immune system in patients with sepsis. The primary purpose of the trial was to assess the safety and tolerability of CYT107 in this critically ill patient population with sepsis. The second goal of the trial was to determine if CYT107 could reverse the profound sepsis-induced lymphopenia and improve the absolute numbers of circulating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Additional aims of the study were to examine the effect of CYT107 on markers of lymphocyte proliferation and activation, and incidence of secondary, hospital-acquired infections.
Herein we show that therapy with CYT107 in septic patients was well tolerated without any evidence of inducing a cytokine storm or worsening ongoing inflammation. CYT107 was effective in reversing the profound sepsis-induced lymphopenia and caused a 3- to 4-fold increase in the absolute lymphocyte count and in circulating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Thus, CYT107 reversed a key pathogenic hallmark of sepsis that likely plays a major role in sepsis-associated morbidity and mortality. Given CYT107’s extensive safety record in critically ill patients, its ability to improve survival in multiple animal models of sepsis, and its documented efficacy in patients with life-threatening viral infections, additional clinical trials of CYT107 in sepsis should be conducted. Targeting the dysfunctional adaptive immune system in sepsis with IL-7 may represent a new way forward against this highly lethal disease.
See supplemental materials and methods for additional details.
Study design and participants
This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase IIb trial of CYT107 was conducted at 4 academic sites, with 2 sites in the United States (Vanderbilt University School of Medicine and Washington University School of Medicine) and 2 sites in France (University Hospital of Limoges and Edouard Herriot Hospital). Following FDA approval of the study, the Institutional Review Boards at Vanderbilt University and Washington University approved the protocols. For France, the study protocol was approved by the Committee for the Protection of Persons (CPP) and the National Agency for Drug Safety (ANSM). All patients or their legal representatives gave written informed consent prior to inclusion in the study. Both the US and French teams used identical protocols registered on Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02640807 and NCT02797431 respectively, for the 2 countries. The data from all 4 sites were combined for analysis.
Inclusion criteria. Twenty-seven patients who met the criteria for vasopressor-dependent septic shock with at least one organ failure defined by a sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score of 2 or higher persisting at 48–120 hours after intensive care unit (ICU) admission were enrolled into the study (Figure 1) (38). See supplemental materials for further patient enrollment details and additional inclusion and exclusion criteria. An additional entry criterion for inclusion was lymphopenia with an absolute lymphocyte count of 900 lymphocytes/μl or lower obtained within 24–48 hours prior to providing consent. Lymphopenia was selected as an inclusion criterion because persistent lymphopenia identifies patients with immunosuppression and a higher mortality (5–8).
Trial enrollment details. Details on patient enrollment, randomization, allocation, and follow-up and analysis are presented. Medical, Surgical, Neurosurgical, and Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Units were screened daily Monday through Friday for patients on antibiotics and vasopressors. After identifying patients in presumed septic shock, patients were further screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria as per the protocol.
Exclusion criteria. Patients were excluded for evidence of autoimmune disorders, active hematological diseases, cancer with current chemo- or radiotherapy, treatment with corticosteroids equivalent to a dose of 300 mg/day or higher of hydrocortisone, and treatment with immunosuppressive medications.
CYT107 dosing regimens. Patients received either CYT107 (glycosylated recombinant human IL-7) or placebo via the intramuscular route. There were 2 different dosing regimens for CYT107; both groups received 10 μg/kg CYT107 twice a week for the first week (Figure 2A). Thereafter, one group was treated with 10 μg/kg CYT107 once a week (low frequency), while the second CYT107-treated group was treated with CYT107 10 μg/kg twice a week (high frequency). Therapy with CYT107 was continued for a total of 4 weeks (last dose administered on day 25 after trial initiation) or until the patient was discharged from the hospital. The maximum number of doses of CYT107 that a patient could receive was 5 or 8 doses respectively for the low- and high-dose regimens of CYT107. All patients were injected twice a week with either placebo or CYT107 to maintain blinding of investigators and treating physicians (see Figure 2A for protocol).
CYT107 increases absolute lymphocyte counts. (A) Patients were treated with 10 μg/kg CYT107, a recombinant human interleukin-7 (IL-7) using 2 different dosing regimens. Both CYT107-treated groups received CYT107 twice a week for the first week. Thereafter, one group was treated with CYT107 once a week (low frequency) while the second CYT107 treated group was treated with CYT107 twice a week (high frequency). Therapy with CYT107 was continued for a total of 4 weeks or until the patient was discharged from the hospital. The maximum number of doses of CYT107 that a patient could receive was 5 or 8 doses respectively for the low- and high-dose regimens of CYT107. All patients received injections twice a week. (B) The CYT107 treatment effect on average absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) was significant for both high- and low-frequency treatment regimens. The gray-shaded region represents the upper and lower limit of normal for ALCs. The CYT107 low-frequency group (red color) was greater than the placebo-treated group at days 15 and 42, and the CYT107 high-frequency group (blue color) was greater than placebo-treated at days 22 and 29. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Statistical tests were conducted using a Wald-type multiple-degree-of-freedom method. Dark arrowhead represents the last day of treatment. Values reported are mean ± SEM. n = 10, 8, and 9 for placebo, low-frequency CYT107-treated, and high-frequency CYT107-treated patients, respectively. (C) The CYT107 treatment effect on ALCs is displayed for each patient over the study duration.
Patient characteristics. There were no significant differences in the patient age, gender, site of infection, ICU days, SOFA, or acute physiologic assessment and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II scores (Table 1). The most common sites of infection were pneumonia and abdominal infection (peritonitis). Pneumonia was present in 6 of 17 (35%) CYT107-treated patients and 3 of 10 (30%) of placebo-treated patients. Peritonitis was present in 6 of 17 (35%) of CYT107-treated patients and 3 of 10 (30%) placebo-treated patients.
Safety and tolerability of CYT107
Of the 27 patients who were randomized into the study, 9 patients were randomized to the high-frequency regimen, 8 patients were randomized to the low-frequency CYT107 regimen, and 10 patients were randomized into placebo. The mean number of doses of CYT107 that the patients in the low- and high-frequency protocols received was 4.3 ± 0.3 and 6.1 ± 0.8, respectively. CYT107 was well tolerated with no evidence of induction of cytokine storm or excessive inflammation. Specifically, administration of CYT107 was not temporally associated with new onset or worsening of existing fever, tachycardia, hypotension, or evidence of organ injury.
Serial quantification of the effect of CYT107 on the proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-6 and the antiinflammatory cytokine IL-10 was performed on patient plasma samples (Supplemental Figure 1, A–F; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.98960DS1). The baseline value for TNF-α in patients, i.e., prior to treatment with CYT107 or placebo, was 17.5 ± 3.1 pg/ml (n = 22 patients). Most CYT107-treated patients showed no increase in TNF-α above the beginning baseline values, while 2 patients had a transient increase at one time point (Supplemental Figure 1C). Baseline IL-6 levels were elevated in septic patients, i.e., 158.5 ± 30.5 pg/ml (n = 22 patients). The majority of CYT107-treated patients showed no effect of drug administration on IL-6. There was a modest increase in IL-6 levels in 2 CYT107-treated patients but also in 1 placebo-treated patient (Supplemental Figure 1A). Baseline IL-10 levels were elevated in septic patients, i.e., 99.0 ± 17.0 pg/ml (n = 22 patients). There was an increase in IL-10 in 2 CYT107-treated patients and in 1 placebo-treated patient (Supplemental Figure 1B).
Serial laboratory testing for serum creatinine, a measure of renal function, showed no difference in CYT107- versus placebo-treated patients (Supplemental Figure 2). Similarly, there were no differences in serial liver function tests in CYT107- versus placebo-treated patients (Supplemental Figure 3).
The only adverse effects attributable to CYT107 were injection site reactions varying from a grade 1–3 rash, as scored according to the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) version 2 toxicity scale. Most injection site reactions that occurred were small and less than 0.5 to 2.0 cm in diameter (grade 1). Six patients developed a grade 2–3 injection site reaction consisting of a raised red rash without vesicles or blistering involving 20%–70% of the surface area of one upper or lower extremity. Despite the rash, 2 patients continued to receive CYT107 for the entire 8-dose regimen. CYT107 therapy was discontinued in 4 patients for progression of the rash as follows: one patient discontinued after 3 doses, one patient discontinued after 4 doses, one patient discontinued after 6 doses, and one patient discontinued after 7 doses. Biopsies of skin rashes in 2 of the patients showed CD3-positive lymphocytic infiltration (Supplemental Figure 4). All rashes resolved without complication after completion of CYT107.
CYT107 increased the absolute lymphocyte count
The major biological endpoint of the trial was to determine if CYT107 increases the absolute lymphocyte count in patients with sepsis. Both low- and high-frequency treatment groups significantly increased the absolute lymphocyte count over the course of the study (combined treatment effect: P < 0.001) (Figure 2, B and C). At day 29, shortly after the end of therapy, both the low- and high-frequency CYT107-treated patient groups had a marked and comparable 3.5- to 4.5-fold average increase in their absolute lymphocyte counts compared with their initial values (Figure 2B). Specifically, at day 29, the absolute lymphocyte counts were 2.98 ± 0.47 × 103 and 3.26 ± 0.72 × 103 lymphocytes/μl for the low- and high-frequency CYT107-treated groups, respectively. After baseline adjustment, at day 29 the absolute lymphocyte count among patients in the low- and high-frequency CYT107-treated groups was greater by 0.99 × 103 (95% CI: 0.14, 2.13) and 1.30 × 103 lymphocytes/μl (95% CI: 0.20, 2.40), relative to the placebo-treated group (combined treatment effect at day 29: P = 0.004) (Supplemental Figure 5). Note that there was a smaller gradual increase in the absolute lymphocyte count in the placebo-treated group by the end of 4 weeks (Figure 2B). In this regard, patients who survive sepsis typically have a slow return of their absolute lymphocyte count towards low-normal values while the absolute lymphocyte count usually remains low in patients who ultimately die of sepsis (6). The increase in the absolute lymphocyte count in both CYT107-treated groups approximated the upper limit of normal for most hospital laboratories, i.e., 3.5 × 103 lymphocytes/μl.
The increase in absolute lymphocyte count induced by CYT107 persists after therapy
Examination of the trajectory for the patient absolute lymphocyte counts showed that the ability of CYT107 to increase circulating lymphocytes persisted for at least 2–4 weeks following cessation of CYT107 therapy even in the patients who received only 3 or 4 doses of CYT107 (Figure 2, B and C). Specifically, at day 42, the absolute lymphocyte count among patients in the low- and high-frequency CYT107 groups were, after baseline adjustment, greater by 1.83 × 103 (95% CI: 0.57, 3.18) and 1.22 × 103 lymphocytes/μl (95% CI: –0.01, 2.44), on average relative to the placebo-treated group (combined treatment effect at day 42: P = 0.001) (Supplemental Figure 5). Note that although day 42 was the final time point for which absolute lymphocyte count was quantified, it is likely that the CYT107-induced increase in lymphocytes persisted beyond day 42. Previous clinical trials of CYT107 have demonstrated that the increase in absolute lymphocyte counts may continue for as long as a year after CYT107 administration is discontinued (31).
CYT107 increased CD4+ and CD8+ T cells
The effect of CYT107 to increase the absolute lymphocyte count was paralleled by its effect to increase CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, 2 major cell types comprising the absolute lymphocyte count (Figure 3). When considered over the entire study period, CYT107 administration had a significant impact on the number of circulating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (combined treatment effects: P < 0.001 and P = 0.004, respectively). At the end of the 28-day treatment regimen, both low- and high-frequency CYT107 dosing schedules caused approximately 4-fold increases in CD4+ T cells compared with their baseline, pre-CYT107-therapy values. Specifically, after baseline adjustment, at day 29, CD4+ T cell counts among patients in the low- and high-frequency CYT107-treated groups were greater by 0.32 × 103 (95% CI: –0.04, 0.68) and 0.28 × 103 lymphocytes/μl (95% CI: –0.07, 0.63), on average relative to the placebo-treated group (combined treatment effect at day 29: P = 0.021, Supplemental Figure 6A). CD8+ T cell counts among patients in the low-frequency CYT107-treated group were not substantially greater (0.12 × 103 lymphocytes/μl; 95% CI: –0.66, 0.90) at day 29, relative to the placebo-treated group. In the high-frequency CYT107 group at days 29 and 42, CD8+ T cell counts were greater by 0.76 × 103 (95% CI: –0.00, 1.52) and 1.39 × 103 lymphocytes/μl (95% CI: 0.37, 2.31), respectively, relative to placebo (combined treatment effects at days 29 and 42: P = 0.030 and P = 0.029, respectively; Supplemental Figure 6B).
CYT107 increased CD4+ and CD8+ T cell counts. (A) The effect of CYT107 on the averaged CD4+ and CD8+ T cell counts, considered for study duration, was significant for both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. The low-frequency regimen (red color) significantly increased CD4+ and the high-frequency regimen (blue color) increased CD8+ T cells compared with placebo. Low-frequency CYT107 therapy increased CD4+ T cells at days 8, 15, and 22. High-frequency CYT107 therapy increased CD8+ T cells at day 42. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. Statistical tests were conducted using a Wald-type multiple-degree-of-freedom method. Values reported are mean ± SEM. n = 10, 8, and 9 for placebo, low-frequency CYT107, and high-frequency CYT107-treated patients, respectively. (B) The effect of CYT107 on individual patient CD4+ and CD8+ T cell counts is presented. Note that the patients at US sites had quantification of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell counts for 6 weeks, while the patients at French sites had quantification out to 4 weeks only.
CYT107 causes a transient decrease in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells prior to the sustained increase
Pharmacodynamic studies demonstrate an initial, brief (24–48 hours) decrease in circulating lymphocytes following IL-7 administration. This decrease is coincident with upregulation of lymphocyte adhesion molecules and homing of lymphocytes from the circulation and into various tissues such as skin and intestine, and to sites of infection (39, 40). In the present study, at day 4 after initiation of CYT107 treatment, CD4+ and CD8+ T cell counts in both low- and high-frequency treatment groups trended in the negative direction being, on average, 31.4% and 25.4% lower, respectively, than their day 0 values (Figure 4). In contrast, in placebo-treated patients, absolute numbers of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells increased by 14.4% and 27.9%, respectively. In comparing CYT107 treatment groups with placebo, the low-frequency CYT107-treated group had a significant reduction in CD8+ T cells by 0.10 × 103 lymphocytes/μl (95% CI: 0.03, 0.19; P = 0.009), on average, at day 4 (Figure 4).
CYT107 causes an initial drop in circulating CD8+ T cells. CYT107 caused an early transient decrease in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells prior to significantly increasing lymphocyte counts. Individual septic patients treated with low- and high-dose CYT107 regimens are depicted in red and blue color, respectively. The placebo-treated patients are presented as a group and depicted with a solid black line. At day 4, CD8+ T cells were significantly decreased in patients receiving low-frequency regimen CYT107 (red color) compared with placebo (P ≤ 0.05). The effect of CYT107 to decrease CD4+ T cells did not quite achieve statistical significance. Statistical tests were conducted using a Wald-type multiple-degree-of-freedom method. Values reported are mean ± SEM. n = 10, 8, and 9 for placebo, low-frequency CYT107, and high-frequency CYT107-treated patients, respectively.
CYT107 effect on absolute neutrophil, monocyte, and B cell counts
The effect of CYT107 on patients’ absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) and absolute monocyte counts (AMCs) was examined. Early during the course of their sepsis, both CYT107- and placebo-treated patients had increased ANCs compared with normal healthy volunteers (Figure 5 and Supplemental Figure 6, C and D). The ANCs returned to normal values later in the patients’ recovery. There was no effect of CYT107 on ANCs through week 2. However, there was an effect of the high- but not low-frequency dosing regimen of CYT107 at week 3 to increase ANCs (P < 0.01). In addition to the overall effect, the high-dose group showed increases of 13.16 × 103 cells/μl (95% CI: 5.74, 20.58), 7.55 × 103 cells/μl (95% CI: 2.38, 12.72), and 5.31 × 103 cells/μl (95% CI: 0.28, 10.33), at days 22 (P < 0.001), 29 (P = 0.004), and 42 (P = 0.038), respectively (Figure 5 and Supplemental Figure 6D). The statistical difference in ANCs in the CYT107-treated patients versus placebo-treated patients persisted until week 6; however, at that time, the averaged ANCs were within normal limits (shaded area) and quantitative differences between groups were small and of questionable biologic significance. The AMCs were similar for CYT107- and placebo-treated patients and were generally within the normal range for healthy volunteers, (Figure 5 and Supplemental Figure 6C). The effect of CYT107 on the absolute number of B cells was examined in a subset of patients (n = 13). There was no apparent effect of CYT107 to increase the absolute number of B cells (Supplemental Figure 7) and these results are in agreement with other clinical studies of CYT107-treated patients (30).
CYT107 effect on absolute neutrophil and absolute monocyte counts. (A) The top right panel depicts the patients’ absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) with the shaded gray area showing the normal counts for healthy individuals. Septic patients had an increase in their ANCs that returned to the normal range as their sepsis improved. There was an overall treatment effect of CYT107 on ANC. Further, there was an effect of high-frequency CYT107 to increase ANCs at weeks 3, 4, and 6. The top left panel depicts patients’ absolute monocyte counts (AMCs). Patients’ AMCs were generally within the normal range (shaded gray region) during their sepsis and not different in the 3 treatment groups. Statistical tests were conducted using a Wald-type multiple-degree-of-freedom method. Values reported are mean ± SEM. n = 10, 8, and 9 for placebo, low-frequency CYT107, and high-frequency CYT107-treated patients, respectively. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. (B) The lower left and lower right panels depict the ANCs and AMCs respectively for each patient in the 3 treatment groups, i.e., placebo, low-frequency CYT107 group, and high-frequency CYT107 group.
CYT107 increased cell cycling
To evaluate potential mechanisms for the effect of CYT107 to increase lymphocyte counts, Ki67 was measured in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells by flow cytometry. CYT107-treated patients had a brisk increase in the percentage of Ki67-positive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells occurring within 4–7 days after starting CYT107 (Figure 6) (combined treatment effect: CD4+ T, P = 0.006; CD8+ T, P = 0.010). The percentage of Ki67-positive CD4+ T cells increased from approximately 10% at pre-CYT107 treatment to approximately 57.6% and 37.9% for low- and high-frequency treatment groups, respectively, versus approximately 15% for placebo at day 8. At day 4, the percentage of Ki67-positive CD4+ T cells was higher in the low-frequency CYT107-treated group compared with placebo, by 23.6% (95% CI: 6.8, 40.5; P = 0.006) on average. Significant differences were also present on days 8 (P < 0.001), 22 (P = 0.053), 29 (P = 0.033), and 42 (P = 0.039). After adjusting for baseline, there was insufficient evidence of differences in Ki67-positive CD4+ T cells in the high-frequency CYT107-treated patients versus placebo. CYT107 had a significant impact on Ki67-positive CD8+ T cells (combined treatment effect: P = 0.010). At day 8, Ki67-positive CD8+ T cells were greater by 17.1% (95% CI: 6.78, 27.3; P = 0.001) and 14.2% (95% CI: 4.2, 24.1; P = 0.005) in the low- and high-frequency CYT107 groups, respectively, on average versus placebo. Significant differences were also present on day 15 (P = 0.010) for the high-frequency treatment group (Figure 6).
CYT107 increased lymphocyte proliferation. (A) CYT107 increased the percentage of Ki67-positive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from approximately 10% at pre–CYT107 treatment to approximately 46% and 22%, respectively, on average for both CYT107 treatment groups. In contrast, there was no significant change in the percentage of cells that were Ki67 positive in placebo-treated patients. There was an overall treatment effect on Ki67 in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, individually showing an effect of low-dose CYT107 therapy to increase Ki67 in CD4+ T cells and both regimens to increase Ki67 in CD8+ T cells as compared with placebo. Additionally, in CD4+ T cells the low-frequency group displayed increased Ki67 at days 4, 8, 22, 29, and 42, while in CD8+ T cells, the high-frequency group showed increases at days 15 and 29, and both treatment groups at day 8 as compared with placebo. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. Statistical tests were conducted using a Wald-type multiple-degree-of-freedom method. Values reported are mean ± SEM. n = 10, 8, and 9 for placebo, low-frequency CYT107, and high-frequency CYT107-treated patients, respectively. (B) The effect of CYT107 on lymphocyte proliferation, as determined by flow cytometric quantification of Ki67, is provided for each patient. US study patients had flow cytometric quantification of Ki67 for 6 weeks, while French study patients had flow cytometric quantification out to 4 weeks only. Baseline adjustment reflects the difference between study day values and the predosing values.
CYT107 decreased IL-7 receptor α (CD127) expression
IL-7 receptor α (CD127) is a subunit of the IL-7 receptor complex. Studies show that administration of IL-7 to patients results in a rapid and transient downregulation of IL-7 receptor α (23, 32). In the present study, there was significant evidence that CYT107 affected CD127 expression on both CD+4 and CD8+ T cells (combined treatment effect: P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively) (Figure 7). In the low-frequency IL-7 group at day 4, there was a significant decrease in CD127-positive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, by 19.1% (95% CI: 4.4, 33.9; P = 0.011) and 26.04% (95% CI: 8.5, 44.4; P = 0.004) respectively, versus placebo. Insufficient evidence was found in comparing the high-frequency group versus placebo.
CYT107 decreased IL-7 receptor α (CD127) expression. (A) The IL-7 receptor is composed of a common γ chain and the IL-7 receptor α (CD127). CD127 is known to be transiently downregulated after administration of IL-7. Flow cytometry showed that there was a decrease in CD4+ and CD8+ T cell expression of IL-7 receptor α in patients treated with both low- and high-frequency treatment regimens of CYT107 versus placebo at day 4. *P < 0.05. Statistical tests were conducted using a Wald-type multiple-degree-of-freedom method. Values reported are mean ± SEM for the 3 different treatment groups, i.e., placebo, low-frequency CYT107, and high-frequency CYT107. n = 10, 8, and 9 for placebo, low-frequency CYT107, and high-frequency CYT107-treated patients, respectively. (B) The lower left and lower right panels depict the percentages of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells positive for the IL-7 receptor α respectively for each patient in the 3 treatment groups, i.e., placebo, low-frequency CYT107 group, and high-frequency CYT107 group. US study patients had flow cytometric quantification of Ki67 for 6 weeks, while French study patients had flow cytometric quantification out to 4 weeks only. Baseline adjustment reflects the difference between study day values and the predosing values.
CYT107 increases early lymphocyte activation markers but not PD-1 expression
We also examined the effect of CYT107 on 2 early T cell activation markers, i.e., CD38 and HLA-DR, and on programmed cell death 1 (PD-1; CD279). There was significant evidence of a combined treatment effect of CYT107 on CD38 in CD4+ T cells (P = 0.004) (Figure 8A). There was no statistically significant effect of CYT107 on CD38 expression in CD8+ T cells (Supplemental Figure 7A). There was insufficient evidence for a combined treatment effect of CYT107 on HLA-DR expression. Although there was no overall effect by the high-frequency dosing regimen of CYT107 on HLA-DR in CD4+ T cells, the effect to increase the percentage of cells expressing HLA-DR did approach statistical significance at days 7 and 22, with an increase from approximately 5% to an additional 2.20% (95% CI: –0.19, 4.59; P = 0.07) and 2.13% (95% CI: –0.05,4.3; P = 0.055), respectively (Figure 8B). CYT107 did not increase HLA-DR expression on CD8+ T cells (Supplemental Figure 8A). There was insufficient evidence of an overall effect of either low- or high-frequency regimens of CYT107 on PD-1 expression (Supplemental Figure 8B). The gating strategy used for flow cytometric identification of cell surface markers is illustrated in Supplemental Figures 9 and 10.
CYT107 increased early activation markers in CD4+ T cells. (A) The expression of CD38 and HLA-DR increases during T cell activation. The CYT107 treatment effect for CD38, considered for the entire duration of the study, was significant for low-frequency dosing regimen CYT107 (red color) in CD4+ T cells (upper left panel). Additionally, the high-frequency dosing regimen for CYT107 (upper right panel, blue color) showed an increase in HLA-DR expression in CD4+ T cells, which approached significance at days 8 (P = 0.07) and 22 (P = 0.055). *P < 0.05. Statistical tests were conducted using a Wald-type multiple-degree-of-freedom method. Values reported are mean ± SEM. n = 10, 8, and 9 for placebo, low-frequency CYT107, and high-frequency CYT107-treated patients, respectively. (B) The lower left and lower right panels depict the effect of CYT107 on CD38 and HLA-DR expression respectively for each patient in the 3 treatment groups, i.e., placebo, low-frequency CYT107, and high-frequency CYT107. Baseline adjustment reflects the difference between study day values and the predosing values.
Incidence of secondary infections in the treatment groups
The development of hospital-acquired secondary infections was evaluated by a 3-member panel of experienced intensive care physicians using the Center for Disease Control criteria for healthcare-associated infections. The panel members were blinded to patient identity and treatment group. Four of 10 (40%) of placebo-treated patients versus 5 of 17 (30%) of CYT107-treated patients developed hospital-acquired infections and this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.72, Fisher’s exact test). Sites of secondary infections included ventilator-associated pneumonia, ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis, wound infections, peritonitis, mediastinitis, knee joint infection, and urinary tract infection.
Mortality in CYT107- and placebo-treated patients
Patients were followed for 120 days after study entry. At the end of the 28-day treatment period, 1 of 10 (10%) placebo-treated patients and 2 of 17 (12%) of CYT107-treated patients had died (P = 0.855, Fisher’s exact test) (Table 2). At day 120, 2 of 10 (20%) of placebo-treated patients and 5 of 17 (29%) of the CYT107-treated patients had died and this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.687, Fisher’s exact test). Causes of death, length of stay in the ICU, and important clinical details that impacted mortality in the patient population are presented in Table 2. Importantly, failure of source control and delayed recognition of ongoing sources of sepsis were contributing factors in mortality in a number of patients. This issue of lack of source control is likely due to the preponderance of surgical ICU patients with sepsis included in this study. One CYT107-treated patient with severe preexisting coronary artery disease and third-degree heart block recovered from his admission for sepsis due to necrotizing fasciitis but died 63 days later of complications from myocardial infarction. One patient in the placebo-treated group died of delayed complications from severe hypoglycemic brain injury when the family decided to change to comfort measures only.
Pharmacokinetics for CYT107
CYT107 plasma levels were measured at 1, 3, 5, 9, and 24 hours after intramuscular administration at day 1 and day 22 (blue and red curves, respectively; Figure 9). At day 1, the Cmax 443 ng/ml was observed at 9 hours with an AUC of 7,472.6 pg/ml⋅h. At day 22, the Cmax 420 ng/ml was observed at 5 hours with an AUC of 4,358.3 pg/ml⋅h.
Pharmacokinetics of CYT107. CYT107 (human recombinant CYT107) was measured in patients EDTA-3K plasma at 1, 3, 5, 9, and 24 hours after intramuscular administration. The blue curve shows the kinetics after the first administration at day 1 and the red curve after administration at day 22. Values reported are mean ± SEM. n = 17 patients on day 1 and n = 9 patients on day 22.
Immunogenicity for detection of antibodies against CYT107
Immunogenicity studies for detection of antibodies against the recombinant human CYT107 employed in this trial were performed at days 0, 11, 22, and 60 for all 17 CYT107-treated patients and were negative for antibody detection (see supplemental material).
The present study of CYT107 in patients with sepsis has several potentially unique aspects. First, CYT107’s immune-boosting effects stand in marked contrast to the overwhelming majority of previous clinical trials in sepsis that have employed therapies to block inflammation and the host immune response (20, 21, 41–45). A second potentially unique aspect is that it represents the first trial to our knowledge that focuses on reversing sepsis-induced defects in adaptive immunity, i.e., CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. The few prior immunoadjuvant drug therapy trials that sought to enhance immunity in septic patients employed cytokines and growth factors, e.g., IFN-γ, G-CSF, and GM-CSF, to increase the number and function of monocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils, which are key cellular components of the innate immune system. In addition to suppressing innate immunity, sepsis significantly impairs adaptive immunity by causing extensive apoptotic death and dysfunction of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, the key cellular targets of CYT107 (2–5). In the current study, over 60% of septic patients had an initial CD4+ T cell count of less than 200 cells/μl, one of the criteria used to define AIDS (Figure 4). The potential impact of low CD4+ T cell counts in sepsis is underscored by reports demonstrating a direct correlation between decreased CD4+ T cells and increased incidence of opportunistic infections and death (12, 13). Furthermore, numerous investigators have demonstrated a close correlation between low absolute lymphocyte counts and increased mortality in sepsis (5–8). Collectively, these reports, considered together with investigations demonstrating that preventing sepsis-induced lymphocyte depletion improves survival (25, 26, 15–18), underscore the potential significance of the present findings in which CYT107 caused a 3- to 4-fold increase in absolute lymphocyte counts and CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in patients with septic shock (Figures 2B and 3).
The profound decrease in circulating lymphocytes in sepsis is mirrored by concomitant decreases in tissue lymphocytes in spleens and other organs in which the number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells is often less than 10%–30% of that present in organs from nonseptic patients (1, 46). Although the present study did not address the effect of CYT107 on tissue lymphocytes, numerous studies in animals, including nonhuman primates treated with CYT107 demonstrate that the robust increase in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells present in the blood is accompanied by a significant increase in lymphocytes in spleens and lymph nodes as well (35). Furthermore, HIV-infected patients who had incomplete immune restoration despite receiving antiretroviral therapy and who were treated with CYT107 had markedly increased numbers of CD3+ T cells repopulating their lymphocyte-depleted colons (47). Combined computerized tomography scanning and positron emission tomography (CT-PET) of cancer patients treated with CYT107 showed spleen, mediastinal, and abdominal lymph node enlargement associated with increased cellular metabolic activity in these organs (35). Therefore, the increase in circulating immune effector cells in septic patients treated with CYT107 likely also occurred systemically in the patients’ various immune tissues including spleen and lymphoid-associated aggregates in lung and gut.
A seemingly paradoxical effect of CYT107 that has been reported in previous clinical studies of CYT107 is its action to cause an initial drop in circulating lymphocytes. This decrease in circulating lymphocytes lasts 24–72 hours before rebounding (39, 40). Our data showed similar findings, with an early decrease in CD8+ T cell counts and a strong trend toward decreased CD4+ T cell counts on day 4 in the CYT107-treated patients (Figure 4). Studies in healthy rhesus macaques established that the transient decrease in circulating T cells that occurs immediately after the initial dose of CYT107 is due to recruitment of lymphocytes from the bloodstream into various tissues including gut, skin, and lymph nodes (39, 40). The presumed mechanism for this trafficking of lymphocytes from the circulation into these tissues is IL-7’s effect to upregulate expression of numerous chemokines and adhesion molecules, e.g., CXCR4, CCR7, α4β7, LFA-1, and VLA-4, on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (48–51). This effect of IL-7 to activate lymphocytes to increase expression of adhesion molecules and chemokines is also the likely explanation for the skin rashes that occurred in many CYT107-treated patients. It is possible that CYT107’s effect to increase lymphocyte adhesion molecule expression will be advantageous in sepsis by resulting in increased lymphocyte trafficking to sites of infection. Inflammation occurring at sites of infection causes endothelial and parenchymal cells to upregulate the corresponding receptor and/or ligand partners for the adhesion molecules and chemokines expressed on the CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. The overall effect will be migration of immune effector cells to sites of infection and enhanced pathogen killing. In this regard, studies demonstrated that mice with viral hepatitis that were treated with CYT107 had a 3- to 4-fold increase in the number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells present in the infected liver and an accompanying dramatic improvement in viral clearance compared with control mice (52).
The increase in lymphocytes in CYT107-treated septic patients is likely due to 2 independent mechanisms. First, as is well documented in multiple clinical trials, CYT107 acts to induce proliferation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (31–33, 50). In the current study, the effect of CYT107 to stimulate lymphocyte proliferation is evidenced by the increase in the cell cycle marker Ki67 in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells of patients treated with CYT107 versus placebo (Figure 5). A second mechanism for the increase in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in septic patients treated with CYT107 is the potent antiapoptotic effect of IL-7 (25–29). IL-7 increases antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family members and decreases proapoptotic Bcl-2 family members (53). Previously, our laboratory utilized a mouse peritonitis model of sepsis to demonstrate that CYT107 decreased apoptosis of splenic and lymph node naive, central memory, and effector memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells by approximately 50% at 24 hours (26). This antiapoptotic effect was associated with an increase in Bcl-2 and a decrease in proapoptotic PUMA. Furthermore, 2 ex vivo studies in septic shock patients’ cells showed that IL-7 restored lymphocyte proliferation in response to anti–CD2-CD3-CD28 antibody–coated bead stimulation (28, 29). This finding was associated with increased Bcl-2 expression (28) and mTOR pathway reactivation leading to aerobic glycolysis restoration and thus to improved lymphocyte proliferation (29).
Important findings in the present study are data showing that the increase in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells is maintained for the entire duration of the study observation, which was at least 2–4 weeks after cessation of CYT107 therapy (Figures 2B, 2C, and 3). These data are in agreement with numerous clinical studies reporting that the effect of CYT107 to increase lymphocytes persists for several months after the end of CYT107 administration (32, 35). This effect of CYT107 to sustain the number of immune effector cells for weeks to months after stopping therapy is likely to be particularly beneficial in sepsis. Many patients survive their initial infection only to develop lethal secondary hospital-acquired infections. These nosocomial infections are a major cause of the approximate 30%–40% additional increase in mortality in patients with sepsis that occurs between days 28 and 90 (54). There was a nonstatistically significant trend toward a 25% decrease in secondary hospital-acquired infections in patients treated with CYT107 compared with patients receiving placebo.
An interesting finding in the present study is the difference in patient response to low- versus high-frequency CYT107. In some instances, the low-frequency dosing regimen of CYT107 had a more robust effect than the high-frequency dosing regimen (e.g., Figures 6 and 7). We speculate that these differences are due to patient heterogeneity both in extent and type of comorbidities, sites of infection, and infecting pathogens. The fact that some differences were seen within or shortly after the first week (when both the low- and high-frequency CYT107 treatment groups received the same number of doses, i.e., exact same amount of CYT107) suggests that patient heterogeneity and changes in patient clinical status rather than CYT107 was responsible for the observed effect. Similarly, we speculate that the increase in ANCs that was observed in patients treated with the high-frequency CYT107 dose regimen may have been due in part to patient heterogeneity or to changes in patient clinical status rather than an actual effect of CYT107. Neutrophils do not express the IL-7α receptor and previous clinical trials of CYT107 have not reported increases in neutrophil counts (55). The fact that CYT107 had no effect on the ANCs for the first 2 weeks of therapy and that there were very minor differences in ANCs in CYT107- and placebo-treated patients by week 6 (Figure 5) makes it less likely that CYT107 was having a major effect on the number of circulating neutrophils.
In a very real sense, the immune system is like an orchestra that works optimally when all its diverse members are functioning harmoniously. There is extensive cross talk between the various cellular components of the innate and adaptive immune systems. CD4+ helper T cells are particularly essential for proper functioning of host immunity because, as their name indicates, they help to stimulate and instruct the phenotypic response of many other types of innate and adaptive immune effector cells. IL-7 has been called the “maestro of the immune system” because of its effect to activate and induce proliferation of these CD4+ helper T cells (56). In this regard, CD4+ T cells from patients treated with CYT107 had an increase in the proliferation marker Ki67 and the activation marker CD38 (Figures 6 and 7). As noted previously, the early decrease in circulating CD4+ T cells after initiation of CYT107 therapy is also evidence of CD4+ T cell activation by CYT107. Importantly, CYT107 also increases CD4+ and CD8+ T cell IFN-γ production in both animal models of sepsis and in studies of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with sepsis (25–29). IFN-γ is a potent activator of monocytes and macrophages, key components of the innate immune system that play an essential role in pathogen killing. Although we did not investigate them, a relatively recently discovered mechanism of action of IL-7 is to increase the number and function of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) and mucosal-associated invariant T cells (MAITs) (57, 58). ILCs and MAITs, which express the IL-7-α receptor (CD127), are present in high concentrations in lung and gastrointestinal tract. These cells respond rapidly to invading pathogens that enter the host through the pulmonary or gastrointestinal system by producing key cytokines that activate protective antimicrobial immune defenses. The fact that studies demonstrate that IL-7 causes a rapid improvement in survival in selected animal models of sepsis within 24–48 hours after its administration may be due to an effect of IL-7 to activate these early responding ILCs and MAITs (26, 59).
Unlike some members of the common γ-chain family of cytokines, CYT107 was well tolerated without evidence of inducing a cytokine storm, exacerbating underlying sepsis-induced inflammation, or worsening existing organ injury (Supplemental Figures 1–3) (23, 24, 30–34). CYT107 has now been reported to be safe in almost 400 adult and pediatric patients with a diversity of disorders including HIV, hepatitis C, cancer, idiopathic lymphopenia, and life-threatening progressive multi-focal leukoencephalopathy (30–37). Furthermore, doses of CYT107 up to 6 times higher than the dose used in this investigation have been administered to oncology patients and reported to be well tolerated (34). One likely explanation for the excellent safety profile of CYT107 is the unique nature of the IL-7 receptor complex, which is partly composed of the IL-7 receptor α subunit (CD127) (23). Administration of CYT107 results in a rapid transitory decreased expression of the IL-7 receptor α chain, thereby rendering the cell less responsive to additional CYT107. Downregulation of IL-7 receptor α presumably prevents overstimulation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. A statistically significant decrease in IL-7 receptor α expression was observed (Figure 6). The only adverse effect of CYT107 in the present study was a grade 2–3 rash that resulted in early discontinuation of CYT107 dosing in 4 of 17 patients.
The failure of many previous therapeutic trials has generated widespread skepticism in the field toward potential new therapeutic approaches in sepsis (21, 42–45, 57–59). Similar skepticism toward immunotherapy was present in the oncology field prior to the extraordinary advances in cancer treatment that occurred with the discovery of checkpoint inhibitors. Remarkably, the underlying mechanisms responsible for immunosuppression are highly similar in both sepsis and cancer (60, 61). Given the common mechanisms of immunosuppression in the 2 disorders, it is not surprising that anti–PD-1, the most widely used and successful immunotherapy in oncology, is also highly effective in restoring CD4+ and CD8+ T cell function and improving survival in animal models of sepsis (62–66). Anti–PD-1 (nivolumab) is currently in clinical trials in patients with sepsis (NCT02960854). This success of anti–PD-1, a second immunotherapeutic agent whose primary target is blocking a negative regulator of T cells, provides additional sound theoretical support for the potential efficacy of CYT107 that, like anti–PD-1, acts primarily to restore the number and function of T cells. Both CYT107 and anti–PD-1 represent a transformational therapeutic approach by targeting a hallmark of sepsis, which is massive loss in T cells and the accompanying defect in adaptive immunity in sepsis.
In conclusion, CYT107 represents a promising and potentially novel approach to sepsis and is the first immuno-adjunctive therapy to our knowledge directed at restoring adaptive immunity in this disorder. Although a larger trial of CYT107 in sepsis is needed to confirm findings in the present study, CYT107 appears safe and effective in reversing the profound loss in CD4+ and CD8+ immune effector cells, a critical pathophysiologic mechanism in sepsis. CYT107 was also effective at increasing T cell activation and potentially assisting in trafficking of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells to sites of infection. The effect of CYT107 to maintain lymphocyte counts continued for several weeks after cessation of drug therapy. Therefore, the beneficial effects of CYT107 on host immunity persist during the time at which surviving patients are highly susceptible to secondary nosocomial infections. The results of the present trial considered in conjunction with CYT107’s demonstrable safety record in other critically ill patients and its efficacy in life-threatening viral infections make a compelling case for a definitive trial of CYT107 in this highly lethal disorder.
Study design. This study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of recombinant human IL-7 (CYT107) in patients with septic shock and severe lymphopenia. Twenty-seven patients at academic sites in France and the United States received CYT107 (in either low- or high-frequency regimens) or placebo for 4 weeks. Primary aims were to determine the safety of CYT107 in sepsis and its ability to reverse lymphopenia. Based on the results of prior trials in patients with HIV or malignancies, a power calculation was performed. A sample size of 10 subjects per trial arm was found to have greater than 85% power to detect an equal or more extreme treatment effect to reverse lymphopenia.
Study deviations. IL-7 administration was discontinued on 4 patients due to a grade 2–3 rash formation at injection site (see Results section on patient safety). Study enrollment was halted at 27 patients out of a planned enrollment of 30 patients because of requirement for additional drug stability testing that was due at this time.
Inclusion criteria. Patients had to be between the ages of 18 and 80, have 2 or more criteria for systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), have a clinically or microbiologically suspected infection (38), a SOFA score of 2 or higher at 48–120 hours after ICU admission, require vasopressor treatment, and an absolute lymphocyte count of 900 cells/μl or lower within 24 hours of a signed informed consent (see supplemental materials).
Exclusion criteria. Patients currently undergoing chemo- or radiotherapy because of cancer, current or a history of hematologic malignancy or lymphoma, cardiopulmonary resuscitation within 4 weeks, history of or current evidence of an autoimmune disorder, organ transplant recipient, HIV/AIDS, hepatitis B or C; receiving corticosteroids at a dose of 300 mg or higher of hydrocortisone/day, receiving biologics that block cytokines were excluded (see supplemental materials).
Thirty-three patients were enrolled into the study but only 27 patients were dosed with drugs (Figure 1). Three patients who were enrolled were not dosed because of marked clinical deterioration with likely impending demise occurring between the time of enrollment and the time of planned administration of drug (CYT107 or placebo). Two patients who consented were not dosed because of rapid clinical improvement within 24–48 hours with resolution of signs of sepsis and SOFA scores less than 2. One patient who was consented was not dosed because of discovery of an exclusion criterion that had been missed earlier.
CYT107 preparation and drug dosing. CYT107, which has been extensively used in other clinical trials, was employed (30, 31). Patients were randomized by allocation to a permuted-block randomization (block size of 3 and allocation ratio of 1:1:1, stratified by country, and dosed using 3 different administration protocols: CYT107 high frequency, CYT107 low frequency, and placebo. CYT107 or placebo was administered by intramuscular injection. If the patient’s platelet count was below 35,000 per mm3 or the international normalized ratio was 3.5 seconds or higher, CYT107 was administered by subcutaneous injection. All patients were injected twice per week for 4 weeks. All CYT107 patients received 10 μg/kg of CYT107 twice in the first week, followed by: the same dosage, twice per week for the high-frequency regimen; and once per week followed by an injection of placebo (NaCl 0.9%) midweek for the low-frequency regimen. The control, or placebo, group was given placebo (NaCl 0.9%) twice per week.
The statistician, local pharmacist, and the central laboratory in charge of pharmacokinetic (PK)/immunogenicity analysis were the only unblinded entities.
Blood samples were drawn for flow cytometric analysis prior to the first dose (day 0), following dosing on days 4, 8, 15, and 22, and then on days 29 and 42. PK samples were drawn on the initial dosing day and on day 22. Immunogenicity samples were collected prior to initial dosing (day 0), and then on days 11, 22, and 60.
Flow cytometry. Flow cytometric analysis was performed as previously described (28, 46) — see supplemental materials and methods. Cells stained with cocktails examining only surface markers were fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde, while cells stained for intracellular markers were first surface stained, permeabilized, and stained for intracellular markers (Ki67). Acquisitions were analyzed with FlowJo v 10.2 (FlowJo, LLC).
Number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. CD4+ and CD8+ T cell numbers were calculated using flow cytometric results. First, the lymphocytes were gated on FSC × SSC, and then the percentages of CD3+CD4+ cells and CD3+CD8+ cells were determined (Supplemental Figure 5 provides the gating strategy). The frequency of parent percentages was multiplied by absolute lymphocyte count and the product was used as the number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, respectively.
Molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome (MESF). MESF was calculated by obtaining the population’s geometric mean fluorescence intensity (GMFI) and plotting it against values derived from Quantum PE (monocyte HLA-DR, CD279) or Quantum APC (Ki-67, CD127) beads (Bangs Lab) in Microsoft Excel.
Quantification of circulating cytokines IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α via ELISA. Cytokine kits for TNF-α, IL6, and IL-10 were obtained from Biolegend and R&D Systems — see supplemental materials and methods. Assays were performed exactly as per the manufacturer’s instructions and as previously described (46).
PK and immunogenicity analysis. PK and immunogenicity testing were carried out by Eurofins ADME BIOANALYSES.
For PK analysis, CYT107 was measured in EDTA-3K plasma samples using a validated DIACLONE ELISA kit (catalog 851.680.020). The method includes a capture CYT107 antibody and a biotinylated detection antibody. The results obtained during the validation studies are reported in a Eurofins full bioanalytical report.
For immunogenicity testing, anti-CYT107 antibodies were detected in heparin-Li plasma samples. Briefly the ability of plasma samples to bind CYT107 are compared with a positive anti–rh-CYT107 IgG (Preprotech) in a preliminary screening test aimed at detecting anti-CYT107 binding antibodies. Positive samples from this screening assay are then spiked with CYT107 to displace and detect the specificity of the binding activity.
Statistics. Comparisons across treatment groups at baseline were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Fisher’s exact test. Each outcome variable (e.g., absolute lymphocyte count) was baseline adjusted by subtracting the corresponding baseline value. Baseline-adjusted outcomes were then analyzed using linear mixed-effects regression, adjusting for study day (as a categorical variable), treatment group, and the interaction between study day and treatment group. All figures show values plotted as mean ± SEM (see supplemental methods for additional details).
Study approval. This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase IIb trial of CYT107 was conducted at 4 academic sites, with 2 sites in the United States (Vanderbilt University and Washington University ) and 2 sites in France (University Hospital of Limoges and Edouard Herriot Hospital). Following FDA approval of the study, the Institutional Review Boards at Vanderbilt University (IRB 152001) and Washington University (IRB 20161106) approved the protocols. For France, the study protocol was approved by the CPP and ANSM. All patients or their legal representatives gave written informed consent prior to study inclusion.
BF, SKD, ERS, TD, GM, TR, MM, and RSH conceived and designed the study. RJ, AHW, MSS, JU, AG, TB, MM, GAM, and JB analyzed data and maintained databases. TD, GAM, and JB provided clinical management and study coordination. All authors reviewed the manuscript and discussed results.
This study was supported by funding from Revimmune and by NIH grants GM44118 and GM55194 to R.S. Hotchkiss.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Hotchkiss, Departments of Anesthesiology, Medicine, and Surgery; 660 South Euclid Avenue, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. Phone: 314.362.8552; Email: hotch@wustl.edu.
Conflict of interest: M. Morre and A. Gregoire are Revimmune employees.
Reference information: JCI Insight. 2018;3(5):e98960. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.98960.