BACKGROUND. Sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains a worldwide public health problem in need of better noninvasive predictive tools. Current guidelines for primary preventive SCD therapies such as implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), but these are imprecise with fewer than 5% of ICDs delivering life-saving therapy per year. Impaired cardiac metabolism and ATP depletion cause arrhythmias in experimental models, but a link between arrhythmias and cardiac energetic abnormalities in people has not been explored, nor the potential for metabolically predicting clinical SCD risk. METHODS. We prospectively measured myocardial energy metabolism noninvasively with phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy in patients with no history of significant arrhythmias prior to scheduled ICD implantation for primary prevention in the setting of reduced LVEF (≤35%). RESULTS. By two different analyses, low myocardial ATP significantly predicted the composite of subsequent appropriate ICD firings for life-threatening arrhythmias and cardiac death over ~10 years. Life-threatening arrhythmia risk was ~3-fold higher in low ATP patients and independent of established risk factors including LVEF. In patients with normal ATP, rates of appropriate ICD firings were several-fold lower than reported rates of ICD complications and inappropriate firings. CONCLUSION. These first data linking in vivo myocardial ATP depletion and subsequent significant arrhythmic events in people suggest an energetic component to clinical life-threatening ventricular arrhythmogenesis. The findings support investigation of metabolic strategies that limit ATP loss to treat or prevent life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias and herald non-invasive metabolic imaging as a complementary SCD risk stratification tool. TRIAL REGISTRATION. NCT00181233. FUNDING. This work was supported by DW Reynolds Foundation, the National Institutes of Health (grants HL61912, HL056882, HL103812, HL132181, HL140034), and the Russell H. Morgan (P.A.B.) and Clarence Doodeman (R.G.W.) Endowments at Johns Hopkins.
T. Jake Samuel, Shenghan Lai, Michael Schär, Katherine C. Wu, Angela M. Steinberg, An-Chi Wei, Mark Anderson, Gordon F. Tomaselli, Gary Gerstenblith, Paul A. Bottomley, Robert G. Weiss
BACKGROUND. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains a global health emergency with limited treatment options, lagging vaccine rates, and inadequate healthcare resources in the face of an ongoing calamity. The disease is characterized by immune dysregulation and cytokine storm. Cyclosporine A (CSA) is a calcineurin inhibitor that modulates cytokine production and may have direct antiviral properties against coronaviruses. METHODS. To test whether a short course of CSA was safe in COVID-19 patients, we treated 10 hospitalized, oxygen requiring, non-critically ill patients with CSA (starting dose of 9mg/kg/day). We evaluated patients for clinical response and adverse events and measured serum cytokines and chemokines associated with COVID-19 hyper-inflammation and conducted gene-expression analyses. RESULTS. Five subjects experienced adverse events, none were serious; transaminitis was most common. No subject required intensive care unit (ICU)-level care and all patients were discharged alive. CSA treatment was associated with significant reductions in serum cytokines and chemokines important in COVID-19 hyper-inflammation, including CXCL10. Following CSA administration, we also observed a significant reduction in type I interferon gene expression signatures and other transcriptional profiles associated with exacerbated hyper-inflammation in the peripheral blood cells of these patients. CONCLUSIONS. Short courses of CSA appear safe and feasible in COVID-19 patients requiring oxygen and may be a useful adjunct in resource-limited health care settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION. This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (IND#149997, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04412785). FUNDING. This study was internally funded by the Center for Cellular Immunotherapies
Emily A. Blumberg, Julia Han Noll, Pablo Tebas, Joseph A. Fraietta, Ian Frank, Amy E. Marshall, Anne Chew, Elizabeth A. Veloso, Alison Carulli, Walter Rogal, Avery L. Gaymon, Aliza H. Schmidt, Tiffany Barnette, Renee Jurek, Rene Martins, Briana M. Hudson, Kalyan Chavda, Christina M. Bailey, Sarah E. Church, Hooman Noorchashm, Wei-Ting Hwang, Carl H. June, Elizabeth O. Hexner
BACKGROUND. Limited information is available on the impact of immunosuppressants on COVID-19 vaccination in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID). METHODS. This observational cohort study examined the immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, or psoriatic disease, with or without maintenance immunosuppressive therapies. Antibody and T cell responses to SARS-COV-2, including neutralization against SARS-CoV-2 variants were determined before and after 1 and 2 vaccine doses. RESULTS. We prospectively followed 150 subjects, 26 healthy controls, 9 IMID patients on no treatment, 44 on anti-TNF, 16 on anti-TNF with methotrexate/azathioprine (MTX/AZA), 10 on anti-IL-23, 28 on anti-IL-12/23, 9 on anti-IL-17, and 8 on MTX/AZA. Antibody and T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 were detected in all participants, increasing from dose 1 to dose 2 and declining 3 months later, with greater attrition in IMID patients compared to healthy controls. Antibody levels and neutralization efficacy against variants of concern were substantially lower in anti-TNF treated patients than in healthy controls and were undetectable against Omicron by 3 months after dose 2. CONCLUSIONS. Our findings support the need for a third dose of mRNA vaccine and for continued monitoring of immunity in these patient groups. FUNDING. Funded by a donation from Juan and Stefania Speck and by Canadian Institutes of Health (CIHR) /COVID-Immunity Task Force (CITF) grants VR-1 172711 and VS1-175545 (T.H.W. and A.C.G); CIHR FDN-143250 (T.H.W.), GA2- 177716 (V.C., A.C.G., T.H.W.), GA1-177703 (A.C.G.) and the CIHR rapid response network to SARS-CoV-2 variants, CoVaRR-Net (to A.C.G.).
Roya M. Dayam, Jaclyn C. Law, Rogier L. Goetgebuer, Gary Y.C. Chao, Kento T. Abe, Mitchell Sutton, Naomi Finkelstein, Joanne M. Stempak, Daniel Pereira, David Croitoru, Lily Acheampong, Saima Rizwan, Klaudia Rymaszewski, Raquel Milgrom, Darshini Ganatra, Nathalia V. Batista, Melanie Girard, Irene Lau, Ryan Law, Michelle W. Cheung, Bhavisha Rathod, Julia Kitaygorodsky, Reuben Samson, Queenie Hu, W. Rod Hardy, Nigil Haroon, Robert D. Inman, Vincent Piguet, Vinod Chandran, Mark S. Silverberg, Anne-Claude Gingras, Tania H. Watts
BACKGROUND. Measuring the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 enables assessment of past infection and protective immunity. SARS-CoV-2 infection induces humoral and T-cell responses, but these responses vary with disease severity and individual characteristics. METHODS. A T-cell receptor (TCR) immunosequencing assay was conducted using small-volume blood samples from 302 individuals recovered from COVID-19. Correlations between the magnitude of the T-cell response and neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers or indicators of disease severity were evaluated. Sensitivity of T-cell testing was assessed and compared to serologic testing. RESULTS. SARS-CoV-2–specific T-cell responses were significantly correlated with nAb titers and clinical indicators of disease severity, including hospitalization, fever, and difficulty breathing. Despite modest declines in depth and breadth of T-cell responses during convalescence, high sensitivity was observed until at least 6 months after infection, with overall sensitivity ~5% greater than serology tests for identifying prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Improved performance of T-cell testing was most apparent in recovered, non-hospitalized individuals sampled >150 days after initial illness, suggesting greater sensitivity than serology at later timepoints and in individuals with less severe disease. T-cell testing identified SARS-CoV-2 infection in 68% (55/81) of samples with undetectable nAb titers (<1:40) and in 37% (13/35) of samples negative by 3 antibody assays. CONCLUSION. These results support TCR-based testing as a scalable, reliable measure of past SARS-CoV-2 infection with clinical value beyond serology. FUNDING. Adaptive Biotechnologies, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Fred Hutchinson Joel Meyers Endowment; Fast Grants, American Society for Transplantation and Cell Therapy.
Rebecca Elyanow, Thomas M. Snyder, Sudeb C. Dalai, Rachel M. Gittelman, Jim Boonyaratanakornkit, Anna Wald, Stacy Selke, Mark H. Wener, Chihiro Morishima, Alexander L. Greninger, Michael Gale Jr., Tien-Ying Hsiang, Lichen Jing, Michael R. Holbrook, Ian M. Kaplan, H. Jabran Zahid, Damon H. May, Jonathan M. Carlson, Lance Baldo, Thomas Manley, Harlan S. Robins, David M. Koelle
T cells play a prominent role in orchestrating the adaptive immune response to viral diseases and are a key component in understanding variability in SARS-CoV-2 infection severity and immunity. How the T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination relates to clinical presentation, other components of the immune response, and subsequent immunity remains poorly understood. A population-based swab survey of the municipality of Vo’, Italy, conducted after the initial SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, uncovered a high frequency of asymptomatic infected individuals and their role in transmission. We sampled the T-cell receptor repertoire structure of the entire Vo’ population 2 months after the initial survey and followed up positive cases at 9 and 15 months post infection. We found that 97.0% (98/101) of cases had elevated levels of T-cell receptors associated with SARS-CoV-2 antigens at 2 months. T-cell frequency (depth) was increased in individuals with more severe disease. Both depth and diversity (breadth) of the T-cell receptor repertoire were also positively associated with neutralizing antibody titers, driven mostly by helper CD4+ T cells directed towards antigens from spike protein. At the later time points, detection of SARS-CoV-2 associated T cells remained high, with 90.7% (78/96) and 86.2% (25/29) of individuals having detectable signal at 9 and 15 months, respectively. Notably, at 9 months, T-cell signal was detectable in 84.6% (22/26) of cases who were initially asymptomatic. Forty-three individuals had been vaccinated by month fifteen, all presenting with a positive T-cell signal and showing a significant increase in T cells, specifically directed against spike protein. Taken together, these results demonstrate the central role of the T-cell response in mounting a comprehensive immune defense against SARS-CoV-2 that persists out to 15 months.
Rachel M. Gittelman, Enrico Lavezzo, Thomas M. Snyder, H. Jabran Zahid, Cara L. Carty, Rebecca Elyanow, Sudeb C. Dalai, Ilan Kirsch, Lance Baldo, Laura Manuto, Elisa Franchin, Claudia Del Vecchio, Monia Pacenti, Caterina Boldrin, Margherita Cattai, Francesca Saluzzo, Andrea Padoan, Mario Plebani, Fabio Simeoni, Jessica Bordini, Nicola I. Lorè, Dejan Lazarević, Daniela Maria Cirillo, Paolo Ghia, Stefano Toppo, Jonathan M. Carlson, Harlan S. Robins, Andrea Crisanti, Giovanni Tonon
BACKGROUND. Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections in vaccinated individuals have been previously associated with suboptimal humoral immunity. However, less is known about breakthrough infections with the Omicron variant. METHODS. We analyzed SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody and cellular responses in healthy vaccine recipients who experienced breakthrough infections a median of 50 days after receiving a booster mRNA vaccine with an ACE2 binding inhibition assay and an ELISpot assay respectively.Results: We found high levels of antibodies that inhibited vaccine strain spike protein binding to ACE2 but lower levels that inhibited Omicron variant spike protein binding to ACE2 in four boosted vaccine recipients prior to infection. The levels of antibodies that inhibited vaccine strain and Omicron spike protein binding after breakthrough in 18 boosted vaccine recipients were similar to levels seen in COVID-19 negative boosted vaccine recipients. In contrast, boosted vaccine recipients had significantly stronger T cells responses to both vaccine strain and Omicron variant spike proteins at the time of breakthrough. CONCLUSIONS. Our data suggest that breakthrough infections with the Omicron variant can occur despite robust immune responses to the vaccine strain spike protein. FUNDING. This work was supported by the Johns Hopkins COVID-19 Vaccine-related Research Fund and by funds from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease intramural program as well as awards from the National Cancer Institute (U54CA260491) and the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Disease (K08AI156021 and U01AI138897)
Bezawit A. Woldemeskel, Caroline C. Garliss, Tihitina Y. Aytenfisu, Trevor S. Johnston, Evan J. Beck, Arbor G. Dykema, Nicole Frumento, Desiree A. Wright, Andrew H. Yang, Alexander I. Damanakis, Oliver Laeyendecker, Andrea L. Cox, Heba H. Mostafa, Andrew H. Karaba, Joel N. Blankson
BACKGROUND. Although traditional lipid parameters and coronary imaging techniques are valuable for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction, better diagnostic tests are still needed. METHODS. In a prospective, observational study, 795 subjects had extensive cardiometabolic profiling, including emerging biomarkers, such as apolipoprotein E (ApoE)-containing HDL-cholesterol. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score was assessed in the entire cohort, and quantitative coronary computed tomography angiographic (CCTA) characterization (Medis, Qangio) of total (TB), non-calcified (NCB) and fibrous plaque burden (FB) was performed in a sub-cohort (n=300) of patients stratified by concentration of ApoE-HDL-C. Total and HDL-containing apolipoprotein C-III (ApoC-III) were also measured. RESULTS. Most patients had a clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) (n=80.4% of 795), with mean age of 59 years, male (57%) and about half on statin treatment. The low ApoE-HDL-C group had more severe stenosis (11% vs. 2%, overall P<0.001), with higher CAC as compared to high ApoE-HDL-C. On quantitative CCTA, high ApoE-HDL-C group had lower NCB (β=-0.24, P=0.0001), which tended to be significant in fully adjusted model (β=-0.32, P=0.001) and altered by ApoC-III in HDL levels. Low ApoE-HDL-C was significantly associated with LDL particle number (β=0.31; P=0.0001). Finally, when stratified by FB, ApoC-III in HDL showed a more robust predictive value of CAD over ApoE-HDL-C (AUC: 0.705, P=0.0001) in a fully adjusted model. CONCLUSIONS. ApoE-containing HDL-C showed a significant association with early coronary plaque characteristics and is affected by the presence of ApoC-III, indicating that low ApoE-HDL-C and high ApoC-III may be important markers of CVD severity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01621594. FUNDING. This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) at the National Institutes of Health Intramural Research Program. The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Alexander V. Sorokin, Nidhi Patel, Khaled M. Abdelrahman, Clarence Ling, Mart Reimund, Giorgio Graziano, Maureen Sampson, Martin Playford, Amit K. Dey, Aarthi Reddy, Heather L. Teague, Michael Stagliano, Marcelo Amar, Marcus Y. Chen, Nehal Mehta, Alan T. Remaley
BACKGROUND. COVID-19 is a global pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Some clinical features of severe COVID-19 represent blood vessel damage induced by activation of host immune responses, initiated by the virus. We hypothesized that autoantibodies against angiotensin converting enzyme-2 (ACE2), the SARS-CoV-2 receptor expressed on vascular endothelium, are generated during COVID-19, and are of mechanistic importance. METHODS. The study was done in an opportunity sample of 118 COVID-19 inpatients. Autoantibodies recognizing ACE2 were detected by ELISA. Binding properties of anti-ACE2 IgM from patients were analyzed via biolayer interferometry. The effects of anti-ACE2 IgM on complement activation and endothelial function were demonstrated in a tissue-engineered pulmonary microvessel model. RESULTS. Anti-ACE2 IgM (but not IgG) were associated with severe COVID-19, found in 18/66 (27.2%) patients with severe disease compared to 2/52 (3.8%) of patients with moderate disease (OR 9.38, 95% CI 2.38-42.0; p=0.0009, Fisher’s exact test). Anti-ACE2 IgM were rare (2/50) in non-COVID-19 ventilated patients with ARDS. Unexpectedly, ACE2-reactive IgM in COVID-19 do not undergo class-switching to IgG, and have apparent KD values of 5.6-21.7nM, indicating that they are T-independent. Anti-ACE2 IgM activated complement and initiated complement-binding and functional changes in endothelial cells in microvessels, suggesting that they contribute to the angiocentric pathology of COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS. Our results identify anti-ACE2 IgM as a mechanism-based biomarker strongly associated with severe clinical outcomes in SARS-CoV-2 infection, which has therapeutic implications. We anticipate that additional IgM responses may identify other COVID-19 subgroups with severe disease, and potentially other serious pandemic illnesses.
Livia Casciola-Rosen, David R. Thiemann, Felipe Andrade, Maria I. Trejo-Zambrano, Elissa K. Leonard, Jamie B. Spangler, Nicole E. Skinner, Justin Bailey, Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian, Rulin Wang, Ajay M. Vaghasia, Anuj Gupta, Andrea L. Cox, Stuart C. Ray, Raleigh M. Linville, Zhaobin Guo, Peter C. Searson, Carolyn E. Machamer, Stephen Desiderio, Lauren M. Sauer, Oliver Laeyendecker, Brian T. Garibaldi, Li Gao, Mahendra Damarla, Paul M. Hassoun, Jody E. Hooper, Christopher A. Mecoli, Lisa Christopher-Stine, Laura Gutierrez-Alamillo, Qingyuan Yang, David Hines, William A. Clarke, Richard E. Rothman, Andrew Pekosz, Katherine Z.J. Fenstermacher, Zitong Wang, Scott L. Zeger, Antony Rosen
BACKGROUND. SARS-CoV-2 infections are frequently milder in children than adults, suggesting that immune responses may vary with age. However, information is limited regarding SARS-CoV-2 immune responses in young children. METHODS. We compared Receptor Binding Domain binding antibody (RBDAb) titers and SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody titers measured by pseudovirus neutralizing antibody assay (PsVNA) in serum specimens obtained from children aged 0-4 years, 5-17 years, and in adults aged 18-62 years at the time of enrollment in a prospective longitudinal household study of SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS. Among 56 participants seropositive at enrollment, children aged 0-4 years had >10-fold higher RBDAb titers than adults (416 vs. 31, P<0.0001), and the highest RBDAb titers in 11/12 households with seropositive children and adults. Children aged 0-4 years had only 2-fold higher neutralizing Ab than adults, resulting in higher binding to neutralizing (B/N) Ab ratios compared to adults (2.36 vs. 0.35 for ID50, P=0.0002). CONCLUSIONS. These findings suggest that young children mount robust antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 following community infections. Additionally, these results support using neutralizing Ab to measure the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in children aged 0-4 years. FUNDING. Supported by CDC Award 75D30120C08737
Ruth A. Karron, Maria Garcia Quesada, Elizabeth A. Schappell, Stephen D. Schmidt, Maria Deloria Knoll, Marissa K. Hetrich, Vic Veguilla, Nicole A. Doria-Rose, Fatimah S. Dawood
BACKGROUND. Potent synthetic opioids, such as fentanyl, are increasingly abused, resulting in unprecedented numbers of fatalities from respiratory depression. Treatment with the high-affinity mu-opioid receptor partial agonist buprenorphine may prevent fatalities by reducing binding of potent opioids to the opioid receptor, limiting respiratory depression. METHODS. To characterize buprenorphine-fentanyl interaction at the level of the mu-opioid receptor in two populations (opioid-naïve individuals and chronic users of high-dose opioids), the effects of escalating intravenous fentanyl doses with range 0.075-0.35 mg/70kg (opioid-naïve) and 0.25-0.70 mg/70 kg (chronic opioid users) on iso-hypercapnic ventilation at 2-3 background doses of buprenorphine (target plasma concentrations range: 0.2-5 ng/mL) were quantified using receptor association/dissociation models combined with biophase distribution models. RESULTS. Buprenorphine produced mild respiratory depression, while high doses of fentanyl caused pronounced respiratory depression and apnea in both populations. When combined with fentanyl, buprenorphine produced a receptor binding-dependent reduction of fentanyl-induced respiratory depression in both populations. In chronic opioid users, at buprenorphine plasma concentrations ≥2 ng/mL, a protective effect against high-dose fentanyl was observed. CONCLUSION. Overall, the results indicate that when buprenorphine mu-opioid receptor occupancy is sufficiently high, fentanyl is unable to activate the mu-opioid receptor and consequently will not cause further respiratory depression in addition to the mild respiratory effects of buprenorphine. TRIAL REGISTRATION. Trialregister.nl, number NL7028 (https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7028) FUNDING. Indivior Inc., North Chesterfield, VA.
Erik Olofsen, Marijke Hyke Algera, Laurence Moss, Robert L. Dobbins, Geert J. Groeneveld, Monique van Velzen, Marieke Niesters, Albert Dahan, Celine M. Laffont
No posts were found with this tag.