Research ArticleCardiologyNeuroscience Free access | 10.1172/jci.insight.98694
1Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre and BHF Centre of Research Excellence, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
2Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
3UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: David J. Paterson or Dan Li, Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, Sherrington Building, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.1865272471; Email: david.paterson@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D.J. Paterson). Phone: 44.0.1865272547; Email: dan.li@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D. Li). Or to: Kalyanam Shivkumar, UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California 90025, USA. Phone: 310.206.6433; Email: KShivkumar@mednet.ucla.edu.
Authorship note: KL, DL, and GH contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Liu, K. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre and BHF Centre of Research Excellence, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
2Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
3UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: David J. Paterson or Dan Li, Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, Sherrington Building, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.1865272471; Email: david.paterson@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D.J. Paterson). Phone: 44.0.1865272547; Email: dan.li@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D. Li). Or to: Kalyanam Shivkumar, UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California 90025, USA. Phone: 310.206.6433; Email: KShivkumar@mednet.ucla.edu.
Authorship note: KL, DL, and GH contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Li, D. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre and BHF Centre of Research Excellence, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
2Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
3UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: David J. Paterson or Dan Li, Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, Sherrington Building, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.1865272471; Email: david.paterson@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D.J. Paterson). Phone: 44.0.1865272547; Email: dan.li@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D. Li). Or to: Kalyanam Shivkumar, UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California 90025, USA. Phone: 310.206.6433; Email: KShivkumar@mednet.ucla.edu.
Authorship note: KL, DL, and GH contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Hao, G. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre and BHF Centre of Research Excellence, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
2Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
3UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: David J. Paterson or Dan Li, Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, Sherrington Building, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.1865272471; Email: david.paterson@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D.J. Paterson). Phone: 44.0.1865272547; Email: dan.li@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D. Li). Or to: Kalyanam Shivkumar, UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California 90025, USA. Phone: 310.206.6433; Email: KShivkumar@mednet.ucla.edu.
Authorship note: KL, DL, and GH contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by McCaffary, D. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre and BHF Centre of Research Excellence, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
2Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
3UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: David J. Paterson or Dan Li, Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, Sherrington Building, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.1865272471; Email: david.paterson@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D.J. Paterson). Phone: 44.0.1865272547; Email: dan.li@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D. Li). Or to: Kalyanam Shivkumar, UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California 90025, USA. Phone: 310.206.6433; Email: KShivkumar@mednet.ucla.edu.
Authorship note: KL, DL, and GH contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Neely, O. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre and BHF Centre of Research Excellence, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
2Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
3UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: David J. Paterson or Dan Li, Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, Sherrington Building, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.1865272471; Email: david.paterson@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D.J. Paterson). Phone: 44.0.1865272547; Email: dan.li@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D. Li). Or to: Kalyanam Shivkumar, UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California 90025, USA. Phone: 310.206.6433; Email: KShivkumar@mednet.ucla.edu.
Authorship note: KL, DL, and GH contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Woodward, L. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre and BHF Centre of Research Excellence, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
2Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
3UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: David J. Paterson or Dan Li, Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, Sherrington Building, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.1865272471; Email: david.paterson@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D.J. Paterson). Phone: 44.0.1865272547; Email: dan.li@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D. Li). Or to: Kalyanam Shivkumar, UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California 90025, USA. Phone: 310.206.6433; Email: KShivkumar@mednet.ucla.edu.
Authorship note: KL, DL, and GH contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Ioannides, D. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
1Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre and BHF Centre of Research Excellence, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
2Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
3UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: David J. Paterson or Dan Li, Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, Sherrington Building, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.1865272471; Email: david.paterson@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D.J. Paterson). Phone: 44.0.1865272547; Email: dan.li@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D. Li). Or to: Kalyanam Shivkumar, UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California 90025, USA. Phone: 310.206.6433; Email: KShivkumar@mednet.ucla.edu.
Authorship note: KL, DL, and GH contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Lu, C. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre and BHF Centre of Research Excellence, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
2Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
3UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: David J. Paterson or Dan Li, Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, Sherrington Building, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.1865272471; Email: david.paterson@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D.J. Paterson). Phone: 44.0.1865272547; Email: dan.li@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D. Li). Or to: Kalyanam Shivkumar, UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California 90025, USA. Phone: 310.206.6433; Email: KShivkumar@mednet.ucla.edu.
Authorship note: KL, DL, and GH contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Brescia, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre and BHF Centre of Research Excellence, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
2Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
3UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: David J. Paterson or Dan Li, Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, Sherrington Building, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.1865272471; Email: david.paterson@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D.J. Paterson). Phone: 44.0.1865272547; Email: dan.li@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D. Li). Or to: Kalyanam Shivkumar, UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California 90025, USA. Phone: 310.206.6433; Email: KShivkumar@mednet.ucla.edu.
Authorship note: KL, DL, and GH contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Zaccolo, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre and BHF Centre of Research Excellence, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
2Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
3UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: David J. Paterson or Dan Li, Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, Sherrington Building, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.1865272471; Email: david.paterson@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D.J. Paterson). Phone: 44.0.1865272547; Email: dan.li@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D. Li). Or to: Kalyanam Shivkumar, UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California 90025, USA. Phone: 310.206.6433; Email: KShivkumar@mednet.ucla.edu.
Authorship note: KL, DL, and GH contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Tandri, H. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre and BHF Centre of Research Excellence, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
2Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
3UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: David J. Paterson or Dan Li, Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, Sherrington Building, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.1865272471; Email: david.paterson@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D.J. Paterson). Phone: 44.0.1865272547; Email: dan.li@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D. Li). Or to: Kalyanam Shivkumar, UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California 90025, USA. Phone: 310.206.6433; Email: KShivkumar@mednet.ucla.edu.
Authorship note: KL, DL, and GH contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Ajijola, O. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre and BHF Centre of Research Excellence, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
2Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
3UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: David J. Paterson or Dan Li, Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, Sherrington Building, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.1865272471; Email: david.paterson@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D.J. Paterson). Phone: 44.0.1865272547; Email: dan.li@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D. Li). Or to: Kalyanam Shivkumar, UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California 90025, USA. Phone: 310.206.6433; Email: KShivkumar@mednet.ucla.edu.
Authorship note: KL, DL, and GH contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Ardell, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre and BHF Centre of Research Excellence, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
2Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
3UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: David J. Paterson or Dan Li, Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, Sherrington Building, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.1865272471; Email: david.paterson@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D.J. Paterson). Phone: 44.0.1865272547; Email: dan.li@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D. Li). Or to: Kalyanam Shivkumar, UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California 90025, USA. Phone: 310.206.6433; Email: KShivkumar@mednet.ucla.edu.
Authorship note: KL, DL, and GH contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Shivkumar, K. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
1Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre and BHF Centre of Research Excellence, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
2Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
3UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: David J. Paterson or Dan Li, Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, Sherrington Building, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.1865272471; Email: david.paterson@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D.J. Paterson). Phone: 44.0.1865272547; Email: dan.li@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D. Li). Or to: Kalyanam Shivkumar, UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California 90025, USA. Phone: 310.206.6433; Email: KShivkumar@mednet.ucla.edu.
Authorship note: KL, DL, and GH contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Paterson, D. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Authorship note: KL, DL, and GH contributed equally to this work.
Published May 3, 2018 - More info
Elevated levels of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) are regarded as an early compensatory response to cardiac myocyte hypertrophy, although exogenously administered BNP shows poor clinical efficacy in heart failure and hypertension. We tested whether phosphodiesterase 2A (PDE2A), which regulates the action of BNP-activated cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP), was directly involved in modulating Ca2+ handling from stellate ganglia (SG) neurons and cardiac norepinephrine (NE) release in rats and humans with an enhanced sympathetic phenotype. SG were also isolated from patients with sympathetic hyperactivity and healthy donor patients. PDE2A activity of the SG was greater in both spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) and patients compared with their respective controls, whereas PDE2A mRNA was only high in SHR SG. BNP significantly reduced the magnitude of the calcium transients and ICaN in normal Wistar Kyoto (WKY) SG neurons, but not in the SHRs. cGMP levels stimulated by BNP were also attenuated in SHR SG neurons. Overexpression of PDE2A in WKY neurons recapitulated the calcium phenotype seen in SHR neurons. Functionally, BNP significantly reduced [3H]-NE release in the WKY rats, but not in the SHRs. Blockade of overexpressed PDE2A with Bay 60-7550 or overexpression of catalytically inactive PDE2A reestablished the modulatory action of BNP in SHR SG neurons. This suggests that PDE2A may be a key target in modulating the action of BNP to reduce sympathetic hyperactivity.
Elevated levels of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) may provide compensation in pathologies associated with heart failure, hypertension, and cardiac dysautonomia (1). Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases (PDEs) are enzymes that regulate the cellular levels of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) by controlling their rates of degradation in response to different stimuli such as natriuretic peptides (2) and β-adrenergic receptors (3). Among the PDE superfamily, PDE2A as a dual-specificity enzyme has received considerable attention because it is markedly upregulated in heart failure and blunts β-adrenergic responses via hydrolysis of cAMP in cardiomyocytes (4, 5). It also affects the action of BNP to stimulate cGMP, reducing protein kinase G (PKG) inhibition of intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) and subsequent neurotransmitter release (6). This indicates that manipulation of PDE2A might either be beneficial or deleterious depending on the target cell.
Physiologically, raised BNP is well established to bring about beneficial effects on cardio-renal homeostasis (7) and sympatho-vagal balance (8); therefore, infused BNP should theoretically have positive clinical utility in a number of cardiovascular pathologies. However, large-scale, randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled trials such as FUSION II (9) and ASCEND-HF (10) failed to demonstrate efficacy using a recombinant form of human BNP, nesiritide, in the setting of acute decompensated heart failure. These disappointing results were compounded by the meta-analysis (11), suggesting that nesiritide may actually increase mortality (12) where BNP might facilitate norepinephrine (NE) release (in PC12 cells) and provide a trigger for arrhythmia (13). Interestingly, the sympatholytic action of paracrine BNP is substantially attenuated when PDE2A activity is enhanced in cardiac stellate neurons (6), which is observed during dysautonomia associated with hypertension (14) and heart failure (4).
Therefore, we tested if PDE2A is present in human stellate ganglia (SG) and hypothesized that its levels are enhanced in neurons from patients with sympathetic overdrive. These SG were derived from patients undergoing stellectomy for treatment of intractable ventricular arrhythmias (15) and were compared to those harvested from organ donors. We also tested in a rat model of sympathetic hyperactivity whether BNP loses its efficacy on postganglionic stellate sympathetic neurons due to over-activity of PDE2A, thereby impairing cGMP-PKG via regulation of the neuronal calcium current, intracellular calcium transient, and with resultant effects on cardiac NE release. We identified PDE2A in human and rat SG and found increased PDE2A activity in SG from patients with refractory ventricular arrhythmias and rats that exhibit a sympathetic phenotype. Moreover, we demonstrate that blockade of overexpressed PDE2A or overexpression of catalytically inactive PDE2A in SG neurons reverse-remodeled the modulatory actions of BNP to decrease Ca2+-induced exocytosis and neurotransmission.
Impaired cGMP signaling in SHR neurons following BNP stimulation. Real-time measurements of intracellular cGMP concentration in living cardiac sympathetic neurons were performed using ratiometric fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) imaging in the presence of exogenous BNP (10, 100, 250 nmol/l; Figure 1A). BNP increased cGMP levels in a dose-dependent manner (calculated as a mean of the 4 values prior to the addition of the subsequent dose). However, the cGMP response to BNP was attenuated in spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) neurons relative to Wistar neurons at 100 and 250 nmol/l (10 nmol/l: Wistar = 1.60 ± 0.31%, SHR = 1.10 ± 0.30%, P = 0.262; 100 nmol/l: Wistar = 4.02 ± 0.73%, SHR = 2.16 ± 0.46%, P = 0.043; 250 nmol/l: Wistar = 6.16 ± 0.70%, SHR = 3.89 ± 0.61%, P = 0.021; Wistar n = 14, SHR n = 15; Figure 1B). In order to investigate the contribution of PDE2A and total PDE to the different cGMP responses between SHRs and Wistar rats, the specific PDE2A inhibitor Bay 60-7550 (1 μmol/l) and nonspecific PDE inhibitor 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX; 100 μmol/l) were added in the presence of 100 nmol/l BNP. Both Bay 60-7550 and IBMX abolished the differences in the cGMP generation stimulated by 100 nmol/l BNP (Figure 1B). There was also no difference between the Bay 60-7550 and IBMX responses, suggesting that PDE2A is the major PDE linked to the reduction of cGMP in the SHR sympathetic neurons.
Measurements of intracellular cGMP concentration in living cardiac sympathetic neurons in the presence of BNP. (A) Representative data traces showing dynamics of cytosolic cGMP-induced fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) changes by ratiometric recording of CFP and YFP emission changes in response to increasing concentrations of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) and Wistar cardiac sympathetic neurons. Saturation of the sensor was achieved using 3-morpholinosydnonimine chloride (SIN-1 chloride; 10 μmol/l; Calbiochem, 16142-27-1) + IBMX (100 μmol/l). (B) Percentage changes in cGMP in response to increasing concentrations of BNP (left, from 10–250 nmol/l) and 100 nmol/l BNP with 1 μmol/l Bay 60-7550 or 100 μmol/l IBMX (right) in SHRs and Wistar rats. *P < 0.05 by unpaired t test. In each case, neurons were derived from 3 or more rats. n indicates number of SG neurons.
Enhanced PDE2A expression and activity in SG from disease models. Here we show the presence of PDE2A in human SG. cGMP-PDE2A specific activity in patients was higher (134.6 ± 10.1 pmol/mg/min, from 5 left SG) compared with donors (75.6 ± 17.1 pmol/mg/min, from 4 left SG P = 0.028; Figure 2A). Total PDE activity was not statistically different, although there was a trend for an increase in the diseased group (Figure 2A). There was also no significant difference in right SG between patients and the control group (Figure 2A). cGMP-PDE2A specific activity was enhanced in 38-week-old SHRs (96.8 ± 6.8 pmol/mg/min, n = 6 pairs of SG) compared with the age-matched Wistar Kyoto (WKY) rats (52.8 ± 3.0 pmol/mg/min, n = 6 pairs SG) (P = 0.04; Figure 2B). This is similar to that previously reported for PDE2A activity in 4-week-old SHRs (6). Total PDE activity and that following PDE2A inhibition (1 μmol/l Bay 60-7550) were not statistically different (P = 0.053 and 0.066, respectively; Figure 2B); there was a trend for an increase in the diseased group, suggesting that other PDEs might also be enhanced in 38-week-old SHRs. For the cAMP-PDE specific activity, no difference was detected in total PDE, with PDE2A inhibition (1 μmol/l Bay 60-7550) and relative PDE2A activity (Figure 2C) between 4-week-old SHR and WKY SG.
Measurement of PDE activity and relative PDE2A mRNA levels in stellate ganglia from human and rat. (A) Representative data showing cGMP-PDE specific activities and relative PDE2A activities in left and right stellate ganglia tissue from sympathetic hyperactive patients (pathological) and normal control; and (B) in stellate ganglia tissue from 38-week-old Wistar Kyoto (WKY) rats and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs). (C) cAMP-PDE specific activities and relative PDE2A activities in stellate ganglia tissue from 4-week-old WKY rats and SHRs. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of PDE2A mRNA levels in stellate ganglia tissue of sympathetic hyperactive patients (pathological) and normal control (D) and 4-week-old WKY rats and SHRs (E); data are shown as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 by unpaired t test. Left: left stellate ganglion; Right: right stellate ganglion in human. n indicates stellate ganglia number.
Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis of relative PDE2A mRNA levels showed the presence of PDE2A gene expression in patients and donors (n = 4 left and right SG in each group), although there was no difference due to lack of statistical power (Figure 2D) and probably reflects clinical heterogeneity in the human samples (see Table 1). PDE2A mRNA levels in 4-week-old WKY rats were significantly lower than age-matched SHRs (n = 6 in each group, P = 0.04; Figure 2E), suggesting some conservation of this molecular phenotype across species and developmental state.
Effect of BNP on NE release from WKY rats and SHRs. To test whether neurotransmitter release is altered in prehypertensive rats, we directly measured the level of [3H]-NE release in response to field stimulation of the right atrium. There was no difference between the peak of the first (S1) and second (S2) field stimulation (5 Hz for 1 minute) in both the WKY (S1: +0.72% ± 0.09%, S2: +0.69% ± 0.04%, n = 6, t test, P = 0.724) and SHR group (S1: +1.01% ± 0.12%, S2: +1.03% ± 0.15%, n = 7, t test, P = 0.946; Figure 3, A and B), indicating no significant time-dependent changes. However, the level of [3H]-NE release in SHRs was significantly higher than WKY rats at both baseline (WKY: 2.392% ± 0.078%, n = 6 vs. SHR: 3.314% ± 0.19%, n = 7, P < 0.01 by unpaired t test) and after 5-Hz field stimulation (S1: WKY: 0.71% ± 0.09%, n = 6 vs. SHR: 1.06% ± 0.10%, n = 7, P < 0.05; S2: WKY: 0.65% ± 0.06%, n = 6 vs. SHR: 1.1% ± 0.11%, n = 7, P < 0.05 by 1-way ANOVA; Figure 3, A and B).
Effect of BNP on the norepinephrine release from isolated atria. (A) Representative group raw data traces showing the time control for [3H]-norepinephrine ([3H]-NE) release from isolated atria harvested from 4-week-old Wistar Kyoto (WKY) rats and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs). The atria were stimulated at 5 Hz for 1 minute at the 16th (S1) and 40th (S2) minutes. (B) Group mean data show no significant changes between S1 and S2 within group in response of 5Hz stimulation evoked [3H]-NE release of time control. However, both S1 and S2 are significantly enhanced in the SHRs compared with the WKY rats (WKY: n = 6, SHR: n = 7). *P < 0.05 by 1-way ANOVA. (C) Same as in A but with the addition of 250 nmol/l brain natriuretic peptide (BNP). Group raw data traces (C) and mean data (D) show that BNP caused a significant decrease in 5-Hz stimulation–evoked [3H]-NE release (S2) in WKY rats, but not in SHRs (WKY: n = 10, SHR: n = 9). *P < 0.05 by 1-way ANOVA. Percentage changes in NE release was expressed as a ratio of increase in NE radioactivity after electrical stimulation over the total radioactivity.
To investigate whether BNP affected [3H]-NE release during 5-Hz field stimulation, a high concentration (250 nmol/l) of BNP was added 27 minutes after the first stimulation. This produced an approximately 38% reduction of [3H]-NE release in the WKY rats (S1: +1.07% ± 0.08%, S2: +0.66% ± 0.05%, n = 9, P = 0.04 by 1-way ANOVA). However, BNP failed to change [3H]-NE release in the SHRs (S1: +1.17% ± 0.15%, S2: +1.18% ± 0.14%, n = 9, P = 0.97 by 1-way ANOVA; Figure 3, C and D).
Effect of BNP on calcium current (ICaN) and intracellular free calcium transients in SG neurons in WKY rats and SHRs. We next investigated whether BNP would affect calcium signaling in isolated SG neurons from SHRs and WKY rats. Anti–tyrosine hydroxylase (TH, sympathetic neuron marker) and anti-PDE2A immunofluorescence staining from fixed cultured SG neurons is shown in Figure 4A, confirming that PDE2A was expressed in sympathetic neurons. The peak ICaN was significantly reduced by –18.2% ± 7.2% (P < 0.05, n = 6) after 10-minute exposure to 100 nmol/l BNP in WKY neurons (Figure 4B), but BNP failed to affect the SHR neurons (Figure 4B). However, BNP restored its inhibitory action following inhibition of PDE2A with Bay 60-7550 (1 μmol/l, reduced by –12.5% ± 6.3%, P < 0.05, n = 6; Figure 4B).
Measurement of calcium current and intracellular free calcium transients in stellate ganglia neurons in the presence of BNP and phosphodiesterase 2A inhibitor. (A) Fluorescence images of a cultured cardiac sympathetic neurons derived from a 4-week-old Wistar Kyoto (WKY) rat stellate ganglion that was stained for the catecholamine neuronal marker tyrosine hydroxylase (TH, red), phosphodiesterase 2A (PDE2A) antibody (green), costained with the nuclear marker DAPI (blue), and overlay. Scale bar: 20 μm. (B) Representative whole-cell calcium current traces (upper graphs) obtained before and after exposure to 100 nmol/l brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) (left, middle) or 100 nmol/l BNP with 1 μmol/l Bay 60-7550 (right) from 4-week-old WKY rats and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs). Currents were evoked by test pulses of −10 mV from a holding potential of –90 mV. Mean current density–voltage relationships (lower graphs) in the presence and absence of 100 nmol/l BNP (left, middle) or 100 nmol/l BNP with 1 μmol/l Bay 60-7550 (right) from 4-week-old WKY rats and SHRs. *P < 0.05 by paired t test. Vm, membrane voltage in mV; ICa indicates calcium current; pA, picoampere; pF, picofarad. (C) Pharmacological protocols (upper) and raw data trace (lower) recording intracellular calcium transient ([Ca2+]i) in a single cardiac sympathetic neuron from 4-week-old WKY rats and SHRs. A neuron loaded with fura-2 acetoxymethyl ester (Fura-2/AM, 2 μmol/l) was stimulated by 50 mmol/l KCl for 30 seconds to depolarize the neuron and evoke voltage-gated Ca2+ entry. The size of the first (S1) and second (S2) KCl stimulation was compared. (D) Group data showing KCl-evoked peak [Ca2+]i changes expressed as a ratio (%) of S2 compared with S1 in response to 100 or 250 nmol/l BNP with or without PDE2 inhibitor Bay 60-7550 (1 μmol/l) in the WKY rats (upper) and SHRs (lower). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, compared with control; †P < 0.05, †††P < 0.001; one-way ANOVA. n indicates the number of neurons.
We measured intracellular calcium concentration using ratiometric recordings (with fura-2-acetoxymethyl ester, Fura-2/AM) in single SG neurons. A protocol for the calcium-transient response to 50 mmol/l KCl is shown in Figure 4C. BNP was introduced 7 minutes after the first KCl application. After 10 minutes of treatment, neurons were stimulated again (S2) in the presence of different concentrations of BNP with or without the PDE2A inhibitor Bay 60-7550. In the WKY rats, 100 or 250 nmol/l BNP caused a reduction in [Ca2+]i evoked by high K+ depolarization by approximately 22% (n = 13) and 20% (n = 13), respectively. In the presence of Bay 60-7550 (1 μmol/l), application of BNP reduced the [Ca2+]i transient by –23.32% ± 5.1% (n = 10, P < 0.01) at 100 nmol/l, and –21.17% ± 3.4% (n = 10, P < 0.01) at 250 nmol/l (Figure 4D) in the WKY rats. In contrast, BNP alone did not affect evoked [Ca2+]i in the SHRs (90.51% ± 2.71% at 100 nmol/l, n = 10, and 108.91% ± 4.22% at 250 nmol/l, n = 12; Figure 4D). Moreover, the inhibitory action of BNP was unmasked by the presence of PDE2A inhibitor (100 nmol/l BNP: –24.3% ± 3.1%, n = 11, P < 0.001; 250 nmol/l BNP: –13.6% ± 3.6%, n = 11, P < 0.05; Figure 4D). Taken together, these results suggest there is significant cellular impairment in SG neurons from prehypertensive rats involving the BNP-cGMP-PDE2A pathway linked to calcium signaling.
Overexpression of PDE2A in stellate neurons from normotensive rats prevents the inhibitory action of BNP. To directly test the hypothesis that increased PDE2A activity abolishes the capacity of BNP to reduce [Ca2+]i in depolarized neurons, Ad.CMV-mCherry/PDE2A or its control vector (Ad.CMV-mCherry) was transduced in the neurons of the WKY rat. Western blot showed that PDE2A.mCherry expression (135 kDa, with anti-PDE2A antibody) was significantly enhanced in Ad.PDE2A transduced SG tissue when compared with those transduced with the mCherry virus alone (n = 4 in each group; Figure 5A).
Overexpression of PDE2A in stellate neurons from normotensive rats causes loss of BNP efficacy. (A) Representative Western blot showing PDE2A.mCherry expression (127 kDa) in Wistar Kyoto (WKY) rat stellate ganglia tissue (with anti-PDE2A antibody) 3 days after transduction with Ad.mCherry virus or Ad.mCherry-PDE2A. Band optical density was normalized to that of β-actin (42 kDa) as a loading control. n = 4 in each group, P < 0.05. (B) Representative calcium current traces (upper graph) and mean current density–voltage relations (lower graph) obtained before and after exposure to 100 nmol/l brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) (a, b) or BNP with 1 μmol/l Bay 60-7550 (c) in the transduced with Ad.mCherry virus or Ad.PDE2A from cardiac sympathetic neurons. *P < 0.05, paired t test. Vm membrane voltage in mV; ICa indicates calcium current; pA, picoampere; pF, picofarad. (C) Percentage change in the peak of intracellular calcium transient ([Ca2+]i) in response of 50 mmol/l KCl for 30 seconds in cardiac sympathetic neurons from WKY rats gene transferred with Ad.mCherry virus or Ad.PDE2A virus in the presence of 100 or 250 nmol/l BNP with or without PDE2A inhibitor Bay 60-7550 (1 μmol/l). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, compared with control; †P < 0.05; one-way ANOVA. n indicates the number of neurons.
We then compared ICaN in WKY SG neurons transduced with the mCherry virus and Ad.PDE2A virus. BNP (100 nmol/l) reduced ICaN (–21.7% ± 6.1%, n = 9, P < 0.05; Figure 5B) in neurons transduced with the mCherry virus. However, 100 nmol/l BNP failed to reduce ICaN (n = 7, P = 0.79; Figure 5B) in the WKY SG neurons overexpressing PDE2A. Interestingly, 100 nmol/l BNP in the presence of Bay 60-7550 decreased the calcium current (–14.4% ± 5.7%, n = 6, P < 0.05; Figure 5B) in these neurons overexpressing PDE2A, thus restoring the efficacy of BNP.
For the intracellular calcium transient, after transduction with Ad.PDE2A, 100 nmol/l BNP failed to reduce the depolarization-induced [Ca2+]i transient (–6.7% ± 4.0%, n = 7, P = 0.79; Figure 5C). Indeed, there was a trend for 250 nmol/l BNP to increase [Ca2+]i (+7.8% ± 13.9%, n = 8, P = 0.99; Figure 5C) when compared with the control group. In contrast, BNP (100 and 250 nmol/l) reduced [Ca2+]i in WKY neurons transduced with the mCherry virus (Figure 5C). Moreover, 100 or 250 nmol/l BNP in the presence of Bay 60-7550 (1 μmol/l) caused a decrease in peak [Ca2+]i (–27.3% ± 2.5%, n = 11, P < 0.05 or –32% ± 4.1%, n = 9, P < 0.05; Figure 5C) in the WKY neurons overexpressing PDE2A. Thus, as in SHR neurons, concurrent PDE2A inhibition restores the capacity of BNP to decrease calcium transients. Collectively, these data indicate that upregulation of PDE2A in sympathetic neurons impairs BNP responsiveness, inducing an SHR-like calcium phenotype.
Overexpression of dnPDE2A in cardiac stellate neurons and atria from SHRs rescues the inhibitory action of BNP. Overexpression of catalytically inactive PDE2A was previously shown to increase local levels of cAMP by displacement of endogenous active PDE2A from its intracellular anchor sites (16, 17). Therefore, we introduced a dominant-negative PDE2A (dnPDE2A, a catalytically dead mutant of PDE2A) using a viral vector (Ad.CMV-mCherry.dnPDE2A) to assess whether inactive PDE2A can recover the BNP effect in the SHRs. Reduced PDE2A activity in Ad.dnPDE2A-transduced sympathetic ganglia from SHRs was confirmed by measuring cGMP-PDE2A specific activity when compared with those transduced with Ad.mCherry empty virus (Figure 6A). As we expected, 100 nmol/l BNP did not produce any significant change in the calcium current in the SHRs transduced with the control mCherry viral vector (Figure 6B). However, following Ad.dnPDE2A, 100 nmol/l BNP caused a significant decrease of ICaN compared with the control (−18.5% ± 7.9%, n = 6, P < 0.05; Figure 6B), indicating that in SHR cells endogenous active PDE2A degrades cGMP generated on BNP stimulation, blocking its effect on ICaN.
Overexpression of dnPDE2A in stellate neurons from hypertensive rats restores the inhibitory BNP action on calcium signaling. (A) cGMP-PDE specific total activities in stellate ganglia (SG) tissue from 4-week-old spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) transduced with Ad.mCherry or Ad.dnPDE2A. (B) Representative calcium current traces (upper graphs) and mean current density–voltage relations (lower graphs) obtained before and after exposure to 100 nmol/l BNP in the Ad.mCherry-transduced (left) and Ad.dnPDE2A-transduced (right) SG neurons. *P < 0.05, paired t test. Vm membrane voltage in mV; ICa indicates calcium current; pA, picoampere; pF, picofarad. (C) Percentage change in the peak of intracellular calcium transient ([Ca2+]i) in cardiac sympathetic neurons from SHRs gene transferred with Ad.mCherry (left) or Ad.dnPDE2A (right) virus in the presence of 100 or 250 nmol/l brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) with or without PDE2A inhibitor Bay 60-7550 (1 μmol/l). Both 100 and 250 nmol/l BNP failed to decrease [Ca2+]i with Ad.mCherry virus, unless in the presence of Bay 60-7550 (left). However, 100 and 250 nmol/l BNP decrease [Ca2+]i after transduction with Ad.dnPDE2A (right). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, compared with control; †P < 0.05, †††P < 0.001; one-way ANOVA. n indicates the number of neurons.
We then measured the [Ca2+]i transient in the Ad.dnPDE2A-transduced SG neurons in the SHRs. Similar to the calcium current, BNP (100 and 250 nmol/l) did not produce any significant change in [Ca2+]i in SHR neurons transduced with the mCherry vector (Figure 6C). However, in the presence of Bay 60-7550, BNP (100 and 250 nmol/l) caused a significant decrease of the [Ca2+]i transient compared with the control (100 nmol/l: –17.8% ± 3.8%, n = 10, P < 0.05; 250 nmol/l: –31.1% ± 3.1%, n = 9, P < 0.001; Figure 6C). By comparison, treatment with 100 or 250 nmol/l BNP decreased [Ca2+]i transient in dnPDE2A-transduced SHR neurons when compared with control (–18.1% ± 2.2%, n = 13, P < 0.001; –27.6% ± 2.3%, n = 8, P < 0.01; Figure 6C).
For [3H]-NE release, Ad.dnPDE2 transduction did not change the first field stimulation (S1) on the isolated right atrium from the SHRs when compared with the mCherry virus (Figure 7B; Ad.dnPDE2A S1: +1.22% ± 0.12%, n = 10, vs. mCherry S1: +1.35% ± 0.11%, n = 8, P = 0.72 by 1-way ANOVA), indicating that the gene transfer of Ad.dnPDE2A did not affect the ability of the neurons to release NE on depolarization. There was no significant change in [3H]-NE release after application of 250 nmol/l BNP (S2) in the mCherry virus group when compared with S1 (S1: +1.35% ± 0.11%, S2: +1.4% ± 0.13%, n = 8, P = 0.74 by 1-way ANOVA; Figure 7, A and B). However, in the Ad.dnPDE2A group, BNP (250 nmol/l) produced an approximately 50% reduction in [3H]-NE release (S1: +1.22% ± 0.12%, S2: +0.61% ±0.1 %, n = 10, P < 0.01 by 1-way ANOVA; Figure 7, A and B). These data support the hypothesis that reduced PDE2A activity due to inactive PDE2A catalytic domains can rescue the capacity of BNP to reduce NE release in the stimulated right atrium.
Overexpression of dnPDE2A in atria from hypertensive rat restores the action of BNP on norepinephrine release. (A) Representative raw data trace showing the effect of 250 nmol/l BNP on [3H]-norepinephrine ([3H]-NE) release during 5-Hz field stimulation from isolated 4-week-old spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) atria gene transferred with Ad.mCherry (left) or Ad.dnPDE2A (right) virus. (B) Group mean data show percentage changes in NE release expressed as a ratio of increase in NE radioactivity after 5-Hz field stimulation over the total radioactivity. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) (250 nmol/l) significantly reduced [3H]-NE release in SHRs transduced with Ad.dnPDE2A (n = 10), but not in the Ad.mCherry group (n = 8). **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA.
Three potentially novel findings are presented in this study. First, PDE2A is present in human SG where its activity was higher in the left SG from patients with neuro-hormonal hyperactivation compared with control. This molecular phenotype was also seen in SG from hypertensive and prehypertensive rats; in addition, PDE2A mRNA levels were higher in the SHR compared with normal SG. Secondly, the ability of BNP to enhance cGMP production and decrease calcium signaling and neurotransmitter release was impaired in SHR sympathetic neurons. Finally, PDE2A inhibition or catalytically inactive PDE2A can restore the efficacy of BNP to decrease sympathetic neurotransmission in diseased neurons, as depicted in Figure 8.
Schematic representation depicting the effect of PDE2A on the regulation of BNP in cardiac neurotransmission in normal and diseased neurons. (A) Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) can decrease neurotransmission in healthy neurons by activating the particulate guanylyl cyclase–coupled (pGC-coupled) cGMP pathway to decrease intracellular calcium transients and exocytosis resulting in a decrease in the heart rate (HR) response to sympathetic nerve stimulation. Overexpression of PDE2A in healthy neurons mimics the lack of BNP efficacy seen in diseased neurons. (B) In the diseased neuron, PDE2A is increased and increases the hydrolysis of cGMP and decreases the sympatholytic action of BNP that results in an increase in neurotransmission and HR responses to sympathetic activation. Blockade of overexpressed PDE2A with Bay 60-7550 or overexpression of catalytically inactive PDE2A reestablished the modulatory action of BNP in the diseased neuron. β1-AR, β1-adrenergic receptor; NE, norepinephrine; NPR, natriuretic peptide receptor; SNS, sympathetic nerve stimulation.
Impaired response to BNP in the SHR. The physiological actions of the natriuretic peptides in cardiorenal homeostasis and endothelial permeability are well known (18); however, there has been little attention paid to their role in the autonomic nervous system, considering some reports suggest that the BNP analog nesiritide facilitates NE release (13). It is well established that the inhibitory action of BNP on ventricular myocyte calcium signaling is modulated by the NPR-A/cGMP/PKG pathway (19), where PDE2A regulates the hydrolysis of cGMP (5) and decreases the calcium transient (19). We have also reported that BNP produces a direct depressant action on sympathetic nerve function by decreasing NE release and heart rate during sympathetic stimulation in vitro (6). This is the first time to our knowledge that aberrant cGMP signaling has been demonstrated in cardiac sympathetic neurons of SHRs in response to BNP, indicating possible impairment of PDE regulation of cGMP.
In this study, we questioned whether an aspect of the lack of clinical efficacy of BNP in the treatment of essential hypertension (2, 3) and heart failure (9, 20) may in part be caused by the aberrations in the sympatholytic effects of natriuretic peptides (6) at the level of the postganglionic sympathetic neuron. SHRs have many similarities with human hypertension, including the level of plasma BNP (21) and NE concentrations (22), and chronic progression to cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure (23). They also have a sympatho-vagal phenotype similar to that observed in human hypertension and heart failure (24, 25). Results presented here on the SHR model support the hypothesis that BNP not only failed to significantly reduce the calcium transient and the calcium current in depolarized SHR neurons, but it also failed to inhibit NE release. Moreover, higher concentration of BNP actually increased the magnitude of Ca2+ transients in diseased neurons, indicating that BNP coupling to intracellular Ca2+ signaling is impaired. Although the concentrations of BNP used here need to be confirmed as being pathophysiological, natriuretic peptides reach similar concentrations at the postganglionic sympathetic nerve ending in advanced heart failure (13). Nevertheless, we confirm the intimate link between [Ca2+]i and neurotransmitter release. We also show that impaired calcium responses to BNP in SHR neurons abrogates the BNP-mediated reduction in NE release and heart rate (26) that is coupled to overactivity of PDE2A. Overexpressing PDE2A in healthy neurons could mimic the disease phenotype and recapitulate the loss of BNP efficacy in SHR neurons.
The role of PDE2-mediated cGMP hydrolysis in cardiac sympathetic neurons. cAMP and cGMP cross-talk is regulated by the PDE family that is considered important in maintaining cell-signaling processes and cyclic nucleotide balance within specific subcellular microdomains (5). PDEs are involved in different stages of advanced cardiac diseases. PDE1–3 hydrolyze cAMP and cGMP, and both PDE2A and PDE3A have been implicated in the pathogenesis of hypertension (6, 27). Some report that the activity of PDE2A towards the hydrolysis of cAMP is relatively low compared with cGMP (28), although it still contributes to the regulation of cardiac L-type calcium channel (ICaL) activity, where it inhibits the activation of ICaL by reducing cAMP concentration after being stimulated by cGMP (29). Our findings support the idea that the activity of neuronal PDE2A is favored towards the hydrolysis of cGMP since PDE2A-induced cAMP activity in the presence of 1 μmol/l cGMP resulted in no difference in cAMP levels. Moreover, overexpressed PDE2A reduced cGMP and not cAMP levels in SHR sympathetic neurons. Previously, we have reported that in normal stellate neurons PDE2A inhibition can increase the neuronal calcium current, presumably by slowing cGMP hydrolysis as a consequence of cGMP acting to inhibit PDE3 leading to greater levels of cAMP-PKA activity (14). However, in the present study PDE2A inhibition or IBMX restored BNP-activated cGMP to normal levels (Figure 1B), resulting in a decrease in intracellular calcium handling and neurotransmission.
Although PDE2A is upregulated in cardiomyocytes in human heart failure (4) and angiotensin II–induced cardiac hypertrophy in rats (28), data are lacking for its role in sympathetic neurons and in cardiac autonomic pathophysiology. Chan et al. have reported a proexocytotic effect of BNP that involves an increase in intraneuronal cAMP resulting from a cGMP-PKG–mediated inhibition of PDE3 in PC12 cells (13). This is in contrast to previous work (6) and the present findings where increased PDE2A is directly linked to enhanced sympathetic transmission in the SHR. Of interest, single-nucleotide polymorphisms, such as rs197163010, are present in PDE2A in the SHR/ola strain (30), and therefore this could provide a genetic basis for the molecular phenotype seen in our SHR neurons. The mechanism underpinning upregulation of PDE2A in disease is not fully understood, but might be related to local neural inflammatory pathways, since TNF-α and IL-6 have been reported to increase PDE2A expression (31, 32).
Limitation and clinical perspectives. There is evidence that natriuretic peptide receptor-A (NPR-A) is downregulated in animal models of heart failure (33, 34), and that cGMP production by NPR-A is also reduced in the failing heart (35). However, our results have confirmed that NPR-A protein expression is not altered in SHR neurons (data not shown), indicating that NPR-A itself is unlikely to be responsible for the impaired response to BNP in SHR neurons. SG neurons from the SHR may only provide a qualitative cellular surrogate to study the neurobiology of sympathetic impairment in human dysautonomia, even though SG neuronal responses in the SHR and the molecular profile of PDE2A activity closely resembles that seen in human sympathetic pathophysiology. Because of the limited amount of human tissue (disease or donor), we were only able to ascertain a relatively semiquantitative molecular profile. The variance in these data are influenced by the varied pathology of each patient and the extent of their sympathoexcitation. However, we provide the first evidence to our knowledge for the expression of PDE2A in human SG neurons. Whether these levels of neuronal PDE2A negate the sympathetic action of synthetic natriuretic peptides like nesiritide to treat cardiac failure remains to be established. Interestingly, we found that SG neuronal cGMP-PDE specific activity is significantly increased in both sympathetic hyperactive patients and SHR neurons. In particular, this was observed only in the left SG from the patient group in which sympathetic innervation is predominately to the left ventricle where NE spillover is increased in patients with heart failure (36). Moreover, overexpression of PDE2A in healthy neurons mimics the lack of BNP efficacy seen in diseased neurons. Elevated PDE2A activity leads to excessive excitability and increased NE release. The specific inhibitor of PDE2A, Bay 60-7550, and the catalytically inactive PDE2A (dnPDE2A) targeted at cardiac sympathetic neurons rescued the BNP responsiveness in SHR stellate neurons. Therefore, lowering PDE2A activity is consistent with the hypothesis that neuronal PDE2A targeting might be a putative therapeutic strategy to reduce sympathetic activity. Our data are also consistent with the literature, showing increased intraneuronal cGMP upon inhibition of PDE2A (12, 37–40). Thus, activation of PDE2A by particulate guanylyl cyclase–derived (pGC-derived) cGMP in response to NPR-A binding may form a specific regulatory mechanism, limiting the sympatholytic effects of BNP when PDE2A levels are abnormally high.
Human subjects. Table 1 lists the clinical characteristics of the human tissue samples. Bilateral SG were obtained from patients with cardiomyopathy and refractory ventricular arrhythmias undergoing stellate ganglionectomy (6 left and 6 right SG). Control SG were obtained from heart and/or lung donors (8 left and 7 right SG). Patients undergoing elective surgery provided written informed consent. In addition to consent for organ donation, consent to utilize tissues for research was also provided for tissues collected from organ donors. The tissues were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and subsequently stored at –80°C for PDE activity measurement, or immediately stored with RNAlater (Ambion, Invitrogen/Thermo Fisher Scientific) for gene expression analysis.
Animals. Four-week-old male prehypertensive SHRs and normotensive WKY rats (sourced from Harlan) that have a well-established cellular sympathetic phenotype were used in this study (41). In addition, some experiments were performed on older rats (38 weeks) that have an established systemic phenotype.
PDE2A activity assay. SG from WKY rats and SHRs or from humans were dissected and rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen. PDE activity was measured using the PDE Activity Assay Kit (Colorimetric) (Abcam, ab139460) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, tissues were homogenized in lysis buffer and protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich), centrifuged at 9,600 g (4°C, 10 minutes) in a microfuge. Protein concentration was quantified by Bradford assay; 7–15 μg of protein was used per sample. Samples were desalted using 0.5-ml Zeba Spin Desalting Columns (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 89882) to remove endogenous free phosphate. Samples were assayed in a reaction mixture (total volume, 50 μl/well) containing 200 μmol/l cGMP substrate, 5′-nucleotidase (50 kU/well), and PDE enzyme (20 mU/well) for 17 minutes at 30°C. The reaction was terminated by addition of Green Assay Reagent (100 μl/well). After incubation at room temperature for 25 minutes, the phosphate-dependent color reaction was measured by reading OD620nm in a microplate-reading spectrophotometer. Individual PDE activities were measured in the absence of the inhibitor as well as in the presence of 1 μmol/l Bay 60-7550, a highly specific PDE2A inhibitor. PDE2A activity is shown as pmol 5′-GMP produced per milligram of protein per minute inhibited by Bay 60-7550.
To judge the contribution of PDE2A to cAMP hydrolysis in SG tissues of 4-week-old WKY rats and SHRs, the same protocol as above was performed except 4–7 μg of protein per sample was used, and assayed in 200 μmol/l cAMP (instead of cGMP) substrate plus 1 μM cGMP as an allosteric activator, and incubated for 10 minutes at 30°C.
RNA extraction and qRT-PCR. Total RNA from SG from WKY rats and SHRs or human tissue was extracted using a RNeasy Protect Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For reverse transcription, first-strand cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA with the iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. qRT-PCR was conducted in a total of 20 μl containing 10 μl of Taqman Universal PCR Master mix (Applied Biosystems), 4 μl of cDNA (10 ng/μl), 1 μl of 20× specific primers for Taqman Gene Expression Assays (Rn01648917_m1 for PDE2A of rat, Hs00159935_m1 for PDE2A of human, Rn00667869_m1 for β-actin of rat, Hs01060665_g1 for β-actin of human; Thermo Fisher Scientific), and 5 μl of DNase-free water. qRT-PCR was performed in a 96-well clear optical reaction plate 7000 apparatus (Applied Biosystems), and the thermal cycling conditions were 2 minutes at 50°C, 10 minutes at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 15 seconds at 95°C and 1 minutes at 60°C. All samples and standards were run as triplicates. Results were analyzed with the ABI Prism 7000 Sequence Detection System software (Applied Biosystems). Gene expression was normalized to β-actin that was used as an internal control.
[3H]-NE release experiments on the isolated right atrium. The spontaneously beating rat atrium was isolated and transferred to a preheated (37°C ± 0.2°C), continuously oxygenated (carbogen: 95% oxygen, 5% CO2), water-jacketed organ bath containing 3 ml Tyrode solution where the atrium was pinned flat on a silver stimulating electrode. The method for determining the local release of 3H-NE to 5-Hz field stimulation (15 V, 1 ms pulse width, for 1 minute) was identical to that which we have previously described (42).
Primary cultures of dissociated sympathetic neurons. Sympathetic neurons were isolated from SHRs and WKY rats using a previously described method (41). Briefly, the SG were dissected from the rats and neurons enzymatically dissociated with collagenase and trypsin at 37°C. After a sequential mechanical trituration, the cell suspension containing SG neurons was plated onto poly-D-lysine/laminin–coated coverslips and incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air/5% CO2. Experiments were performed 2 or 3 days after plating.
Adenovirus vector transduction. An adenoviral vector expressing PDE2A or catalytically inactive PDE2A (dnPDE2A) tagged with red fluorescent protein mCherry (Ad.CMV-mCherry/PDE2A or Ad.CMV-mCherry/dnPDE2A) (43) was transduced into cultured cardiac sympathetic neurons (for calcium current and transient measurements) or isolated SG tissue (for Western blot). An adenoviral vector expressing only mCherry (Ad.CMV-mCherry) was used as a control for comparing the effect of viral transduction. Adenoviral vector (5 × 107 PFU) was used to infect neurons or ganglia in a 4-well plate (1.9 cm2/well, Nunc). The virus-containing medium was left in the well overnight before changing to fresh medium. Experiments were performed 3 days following gene transfer, except that the patch-clamp recordings were performed at 12–22 hours to minimize problems with space clamp (14).
For the evoked NE release experiment, targeted percutaneous gene transfer to the right atrium of rats was performed under isoflurane anesthesia (4% for induction and 2%–3% for maintenance in 100% O2), using a technique similar to that described previously for the guinea pig (44). WKY rats and SHRs received an injection of 5 × 108 PFU/ml of Ad.dnPDE2A or Ad.PDE2A in 300 μl of sterile phosphate-buffered saline. Physiological phenotyping was performed 4 days after the injection.
Real-time analysis of cGMP dynamics. FRET imaging was used to measure the intracellular cGMP. An adenoviral vector expressing the reporter cGi500 (provided by Michael Russwurm, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany) (45) was used as the cGMP biosensor under the control of the human CMV promoter. A Nikon microscope was connected to an OptoLED fluorescence imaging system (Cairn Research Ltd.) equipped with a 40× oil-immersion objective, a CoolSNAP HQ2 digital CCD camera (Photometrics), and a beam-splitter (DV2, Photometrics) including the specific set of emission filters for donor and acceptor fluorophore acquisition (dichroic mirror 505DCXR, donor emission of 480 nm, and acceptor emission of 535 nm; Chroma Technology Corp). Images were obtained every 15 seconds. FRET values were measured as changes in the ratio between 480/535–nm fluorescent emission intensities after background subtraction upon excitation at 430 nm. The 480/535–nm emission intensity ratio was plotted against time, and the mean FRET response was expressed as the percentage of ΔR/R0, in which ΔR = R – R0. R0 is the mean of the FRET ratio values calculated from the 4 images acquired before the addition of the first drug, and R is the ratio at time = t seconds.
Patch-clamp recordings. Calcium currents were recorded using conventional whole-cell techniques (14). Pipette resistance varied from 1.5 to 2 MΩ when filled with the internal solution containing (in mmol/l) 140 CsCl, 10 HEPES, 0.1 CaCl2, 4 MgATP, 1 MgCl2, and 1 EGTA, adjusted to pH 7.4 with CsOH. The isolated neurons were superfused in a 36°C ± 0.5°C bath with external solution containing (in mmol/l) 145 TEACl, 10 HEPES, 4.5 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 11 glucose, 1 NaHCO3, 2 BaCl2, and 0.001 tetrodotoxin, adjusted to pH 7.4 with Sigma base 7–9. Barium was chosen to isolate calcium currents and avoid Ca-dependent current inactivation (46); IBa refers to ICa, unless otherwise specified. The bath was grounded by an Ag/AgCl electrode connected via a 3 mol/l KCl/agar salt bridge. Calcium currents were acquired using Clampex software via an Axopatch 200B amplifier. Series resistance was compensated between 75% and 90%. Current–voltage (I–V) relationships were elicited from a holding potential of −90 mV using 50-ms steps (5 seconds between steps) to test potentials over the range of −50 to +50 mV in 10-mV increments. Current amplitude data of each cell were normalized to its capacitance and expressed as current density (pA/pF).
Measurement of [Ca2+]i. Intracellular free calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) was determined in single neurons using Fura-2/AM (2 μmol/l). Loaded neurons were imaged with a QICLICK digital CCD camera (Photometrics) connected to the OptoLED fluorescence imaging system housed on an inverted Nikon microscope equipped with a 40×, oil-immersion objective. The coverslip containing the neurons was placed into a temperature-controlled (36°C ± 0.5°C), gravity-fed perfusion chamber (volume: 100 μl), perfused with Tyrode solution at a flow rate of 2 ml/min. The evoked [Ca2+]i transient was evaluated by 30-second exposure to 50 mmol/l KCl (with equimolar reduction in NaCl) in the Tyrode solution. Fura-2/AM was excited alternately at 355 nm and 380 nm and the emission detected at 510 nm. Fluorescence excitation ratios were transformed into [Ca2+]i concentrations using the equation derived by Grynkiewicz (47): [Ca2+]i = Kd × (Sf2/Sb2) × (R − Rmin)/(Rmax − R).
Western blot. Cultured tissues were homogenized in ice-cold lysis buffer with proteinase inhibitors and quantified by Bradford Protein Assay Kit. A total of 30 μg protein was separated in denaturing acrylamide gels (4%–12% Criterion XT Bis-Tris Precast Gels, Bio-Rad). After transfer to PVDF membranes (Sequi-Blot PVDF Membrane Roll, Bio-Rad), the membranes were blocked with 0.5% skimmed milk for 1 hour. Primary antibody against PDE2A (Proteintech, 55306-1-AP; 1:450) was incubated overnight at 4°C. After incubation with secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L), HRP, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 31460; 1:4,000) for 1 hour, proteins were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence and quantified with UN-SCAN-IT gel Digitizing 6.1 software (Silk Scientific, Inc). The results were normalized to GAPDH that served as a loading control (Proteintech, 10494-1-AP; 1:5,000). Brain lysate was used as a positive control throughout the experiments.
Immunofluorescence. Cultured primary neurons were fixed in acetone/methanol for 10 minutes, followed by antigen blocking in 1% BSA and with primary antibody against TH (mouse mAb, Sigma-Aldrich, AB152; 1:1,000) or anti- PDE2A (rabbit pAb, Thermo Fisher Scientific, PA1-31128; 1:500) in 1% BSA overnight at 4°C. Signals were visualized with Alexa Fluor 594 anti-mouse IgG (H+L) (Invitrogen, A21203; 1:1,000) and Alexa Fluor 488 anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) (Invitrogen, A21206; 1:1,000), respectively. Nuclear staining was performed with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Sigma-Aldrich, D9542).
Statistics. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. All statistical calculations were performed using the SigmaPlot 12.5 software package (Systat Software Inc.). For comparison of 2 groups, an unpaired 2-tailed t test was performed, or a Mann-Whitney rank-sum test if the data were not normally distributed. To compare more than 2 groups, 1-way ANOVA was performed and the Holm-Sidak method was used as a post hoc test. Paired t test was performed when comparing S1 and S2. For all experiments, statistical significance was accepted at P < 0.05.
Study approval. The study was approved by the UCLA IRB (approval number 12-000701) and a materials transfer agreement into the University of Oxford Bio-Bank (MAT2015-705). Written informed consent was provided by the patient or appropriate designee. For organ donors, consent for research was provided by the donor or appropriate signatory. Animal experiments conformed to the NIH Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (publication no. 85-23, revised 1996) and Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 (United Kingdom). Procedures were performed under British Home Office license requirements (PPL 30/3131).
KL performed Western blots, qRT-PCR, [3H]-NE release, calcium transient measurements, analyzed data, and drafted the manuscript. DL participated in design of the study, supervision, performed PDE activity assay, analyzed data, and cowrote the manuscript. GH performed patch-clamp recordings and analyzed data. DM, ON, LW, and DI performed FRET and measured the calcium transient. CJL performed the in vivo injections. MB and MZ provided the reporter and contributed towards the FRET experimental design. HT, OAA, JLA, and KS provided human tissue and edited the manuscript. DJP oversaw experiments, design, supervision, resources, and edited the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
This project was supported by grants from the British Heart Foundation (BHF, PG/14/41/30877 to D.J. Paterson and D. Li; PG/10/75/28537 and RG/12/3/29423 to M. Zaccolo), the BHF Centre of Research Excellence, Oxford (RE/13/1/30181 to D.J. Paterson and M. Zaccolo) and US NIH SPARC program (1OT2OD023848). The authors wish to acknowledge the support of One Legacy in obtaining donor tissue samples. We also thank Andreas Koschinski for technical assistance.
Address correspondence to: David J. Paterson or Dan Li, Burdon Sanderson Cardiac Science Centre, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, Sherrington Building, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.1865272471; Email: david.paterson@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D.J. Paterson). Phone: 44.0.1865272547; Email: dan.li@dpag.ox.ac.uk (D. Li). Or to: Kalyanam Shivkumar, UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California 90025, USA. Phone: 310.206.6433; Email: KShivkumar@mednet.ucla.edu.
CJL’s present address is the Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Reference information: JCI Insight. 2018;3(9):e98694. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.98694.