Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article
Advertisement

Research ArticleImmunologyInfectious disease Open Access | 10.1172/jci.insight.149953

Basophil-derived IL-4 promotes cutaneous Staphylococcus aureus infection

Juan-Manuel Leyva-Castillo,1,2 Mrinmoy Das,1,2 Jennifer Kane,1,2 Maria Strakosha,1,2 Sonal Singh,1,2 Daniel Sen Hoi Wong,1,2 Alexander R. Horswill,3 Hajime Karasuyama,4 Frank Brombacher,5 Lloyd S. Miller,6 and Raif S. Geha1,2

1Division of Immunology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

2Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

3Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

4Inflammation, Infection and Immunity Laboratory, TMDU Advanced Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan.

5International Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Cape Town Component and Health Science Faculty, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

6Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Juan-Manuel Leyva-Castillo or Raif S. Geha, Boston Children’s Hospital, Division of Immunology, One Blackfan Circle, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: 617.919.2482; Email: Manuel.LeyvaCastillo@childrens.harvard.edu (JMLC). Email: Raif.Geha@childrens.harvard.edu (RSG). JK’s present address is: Department of Dermatology and Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. SS’s present address is: Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. DSHW’s present address is: Department of Biochemistry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. LSM’s present address is: Immunology, Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.

Authorship note: MD and JK contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Leyva-Castillo, J. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Division of Immunology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

2Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

3Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

4Inflammation, Infection and Immunity Laboratory, TMDU Advanced Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan.

5International Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Cape Town Component and Health Science Faculty, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

6Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Juan-Manuel Leyva-Castillo or Raif S. Geha, Boston Children’s Hospital, Division of Immunology, One Blackfan Circle, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: 617.919.2482; Email: Manuel.LeyvaCastillo@childrens.harvard.edu (JMLC). Email: Raif.Geha@childrens.harvard.edu (RSG). JK’s present address is: Department of Dermatology and Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. SS’s present address is: Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. DSHW’s present address is: Department of Biochemistry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. LSM’s present address is: Immunology, Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.

Authorship note: MD and JK contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Das, M. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Division of Immunology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

2Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

3Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

4Inflammation, Infection and Immunity Laboratory, TMDU Advanced Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan.

5International Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Cape Town Component and Health Science Faculty, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

6Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Juan-Manuel Leyva-Castillo or Raif S. Geha, Boston Children’s Hospital, Division of Immunology, One Blackfan Circle, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: 617.919.2482; Email: Manuel.LeyvaCastillo@childrens.harvard.edu (JMLC). Email: Raif.Geha@childrens.harvard.edu (RSG). JK’s present address is: Department of Dermatology and Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. SS’s present address is: Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. DSHW’s present address is: Department of Biochemistry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. LSM’s present address is: Immunology, Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.

Authorship note: MD and JK contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Kane, J. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Division of Immunology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

2Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

3Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

4Inflammation, Infection and Immunity Laboratory, TMDU Advanced Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan.

5International Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Cape Town Component and Health Science Faculty, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

6Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Juan-Manuel Leyva-Castillo or Raif S. Geha, Boston Children’s Hospital, Division of Immunology, One Blackfan Circle, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: 617.919.2482; Email: Manuel.LeyvaCastillo@childrens.harvard.edu (JMLC). Email: Raif.Geha@childrens.harvard.edu (RSG). JK’s present address is: Department of Dermatology and Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. SS’s present address is: Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. DSHW’s present address is: Department of Biochemistry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. LSM’s present address is: Immunology, Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.

Authorship note: MD and JK contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Strakosha, M. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Division of Immunology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

2Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

3Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

4Inflammation, Infection and Immunity Laboratory, TMDU Advanced Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan.

5International Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Cape Town Component and Health Science Faculty, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

6Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Juan-Manuel Leyva-Castillo or Raif S. Geha, Boston Children’s Hospital, Division of Immunology, One Blackfan Circle, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: 617.919.2482; Email: Manuel.LeyvaCastillo@childrens.harvard.edu (JMLC). Email: Raif.Geha@childrens.harvard.edu (RSG). JK’s present address is: Department of Dermatology and Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. SS’s present address is: Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. DSHW’s present address is: Department of Biochemistry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. LSM’s present address is: Immunology, Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.

Authorship note: MD and JK contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Singh, S. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Division of Immunology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

2Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

3Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

4Inflammation, Infection and Immunity Laboratory, TMDU Advanced Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan.

5International Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Cape Town Component and Health Science Faculty, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

6Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Juan-Manuel Leyva-Castillo or Raif S. Geha, Boston Children’s Hospital, Division of Immunology, One Blackfan Circle, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: 617.919.2482; Email: Manuel.LeyvaCastillo@childrens.harvard.edu (JMLC). Email: Raif.Geha@childrens.harvard.edu (RSG). JK’s present address is: Department of Dermatology and Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. SS’s present address is: Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. DSHW’s present address is: Department of Biochemistry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. LSM’s present address is: Immunology, Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.

Authorship note: MD and JK contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Wong, D. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Division of Immunology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

2Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

3Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

4Inflammation, Infection and Immunity Laboratory, TMDU Advanced Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan.

5International Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Cape Town Component and Health Science Faculty, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

6Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Juan-Manuel Leyva-Castillo or Raif S. Geha, Boston Children’s Hospital, Division of Immunology, One Blackfan Circle, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: 617.919.2482; Email: Manuel.LeyvaCastillo@childrens.harvard.edu (JMLC). Email: Raif.Geha@childrens.harvard.edu (RSG). JK’s present address is: Department of Dermatology and Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. SS’s present address is: Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. DSHW’s present address is: Department of Biochemistry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. LSM’s present address is: Immunology, Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.

Authorship note: MD and JK contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Horswill, A. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Division of Immunology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

2Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

3Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

4Inflammation, Infection and Immunity Laboratory, TMDU Advanced Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan.

5International Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Cape Town Component and Health Science Faculty, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

6Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Juan-Manuel Leyva-Castillo or Raif S. Geha, Boston Children’s Hospital, Division of Immunology, One Blackfan Circle, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: 617.919.2482; Email: Manuel.LeyvaCastillo@childrens.harvard.edu (JMLC). Email: Raif.Geha@childrens.harvard.edu (RSG). JK’s present address is: Department of Dermatology and Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. SS’s present address is: Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. DSHW’s present address is: Department of Biochemistry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. LSM’s present address is: Immunology, Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.

Authorship note: MD and JK contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Karasuyama, H. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Division of Immunology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

2Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

3Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

4Inflammation, Infection and Immunity Laboratory, TMDU Advanced Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan.

5International Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Cape Town Component and Health Science Faculty, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

6Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Juan-Manuel Leyva-Castillo or Raif S. Geha, Boston Children’s Hospital, Division of Immunology, One Blackfan Circle, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: 617.919.2482; Email: Manuel.LeyvaCastillo@childrens.harvard.edu (JMLC). Email: Raif.Geha@childrens.harvard.edu (RSG). JK’s present address is: Department of Dermatology and Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. SS’s present address is: Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. DSHW’s present address is: Department of Biochemistry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. LSM’s present address is: Immunology, Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.

Authorship note: MD and JK contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Brombacher, F. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Division of Immunology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

2Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

3Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

4Inflammation, Infection and Immunity Laboratory, TMDU Advanced Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan.

5International Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Cape Town Component and Health Science Faculty, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

6Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Juan-Manuel Leyva-Castillo or Raif S. Geha, Boston Children’s Hospital, Division of Immunology, One Blackfan Circle, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: 617.919.2482; Email: Manuel.LeyvaCastillo@childrens.harvard.edu (JMLC). Email: Raif.Geha@childrens.harvard.edu (RSG). JK’s present address is: Department of Dermatology and Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. SS’s present address is: Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. DSHW’s present address is: Department of Biochemistry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. LSM’s present address is: Immunology, Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.

Authorship note: MD and JK contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Miller, L. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Division of Immunology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

2Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

3Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

4Inflammation, Infection and Immunity Laboratory, TMDU Advanced Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan.

5International Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Cape Town Component and Health Science Faculty, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

6Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Juan-Manuel Leyva-Castillo or Raif S. Geha, Boston Children’s Hospital, Division of Immunology, One Blackfan Circle, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: 617.919.2482; Email: Manuel.LeyvaCastillo@childrens.harvard.edu (JMLC). Email: Raif.Geha@childrens.harvard.edu (RSG). JK’s present address is: Department of Dermatology and Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. SS’s present address is: Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. DSHW’s present address is: Department of Biochemistry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. LSM’s present address is: Immunology, Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.

Authorship note: MD and JK contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Geha, R. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

Authorship note: MD and JK contributed equally to this work.

Published November 8, 2021 - More info

Published in Volume 6, Issue 21 on November 8, 2021
JCI Insight. 2021;6(21):e149953. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.149953.
© 2021 Leyva-Castillo et al. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Published November 8, 2021 - Version history
Received: March 25, 2021; Accepted: September 29, 2021
View PDF
Abstract

Superficial cutaneous Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) infection in humans can lead to soft tissue infection, an important cause of morbidity and mortality. IL-17A production by skin TCRγδ+ cells in response to IL-1 and IL-23 produced by epithelial and immune cells is important for restraining S. aureus skin infection. How S. aureus evades this cutaneous innate immune response to establish infection is not clear. Here we show that mechanical injury of mouse skin by tape stripping predisposed mice to superficial skin infection with S. aureus. Topical application of S. aureus to tape-stripped skin caused cutaneous influx of basophils and increased Il4 expression. This basophil-derived IL-4 inhibited cutaneous IL-17A production by TCRγδ+ cells and promoted S. aureus infection of tape-stripped skin. We demonstrate that IL-4 acted on multiple checkpoints that suppress the cutaneous IL-17A response. It reduced Il1 and Il23 expression by keratinocytes, inhibited IL-1+IL-23–driven IL-17A production by TCRγδ+ cells, and impaired IL-17A–driven induction of neutrophil-attracting chemokines by keratinocytes. IL-4 receptor blockade is shown to promote Il17a expression and enhance bacterial clearance in tape-stripped mouse skin exposed to S. aureus, suggesting that it could serve as a therapeutic approach to prevent skin and soft tissue infection.

Graphical Abstract
graphical abstract
Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is the most common causative agent of bacterial skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) (1–3). Impetigo, a superficial skin infection that commonly affects children, can lead to SSTIs. S. aureus commonly infects the skin of healthy individuals following trauma, burns, or surgical interventions, as well as the skin of patients with chronic diseases characterized by itching, such as atopic dermatitis (AD) and diabetes, suggesting that skin barrier disruption predisposes to cutaneous S. aureus infection (3–6).

IL-17A is a proinflammatory cytokine produced by CD4+ Th17 cells, TCRγδ+ cells, and type 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3s). IL-17A plays an important role in protection against mucosal infections, by recruiting neutrophils and promoting the production of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) by epithelial cells (7, 8). Patients and mice with defects in IL-17A, IL-17A receptor chains, or IL-17A signaling, or defects in neutrophil number or function, are susceptible to mucosal and skin infections caused by S. aureus (9–11). In particular, IL-17A production by TCRγδ+ T cells and subsequent neutrophil recruitment to the skin play a critical role in controlling cutaneous S. aureus infection (7, 8, 11–14). The cytokines IL-1 and IL-23 are produced by several cells in the skin, including keratinocytes, DCs, and macrophages, and play an important role in driving IL-17A production (15, 16). Patients and mice with defects in IL-1 and IL-23 production or signaling have defective IL-17A production and are susceptible to S. aureus infections (16–22).

Basophils account for less than 1% of peripheral blood leukocytes. Basophils produce IL-4 and IL-13 and have been identified as important players in type 2 immune responses against allergens and parasitic infection (23). IL-4 has been shown to inhibit IL-17A production via STAT6 inhibition to the Il17a promoter (24). Basophils may promote Th17 responses by secreting IL-6 (25–28). Moreover, basophil-derived TNF-α enhances survival in sepsis induced by cecal ligation and puncture in mice (29). It is not known whether basophils and their products play a role in cutaneous S. aureus infection.

The mechanisms by which S. aureus circumvents the innate immune response to establish infection in injured skin are not well understood. We show that tape stripping, which only disrupts the upper layers of the epidermis, rendered mouse skin susceptible to S. aureus infection and that IL-4 derived from basophils recruited into S. aureus–exposed, tape-stripped skin inhibited cutaneous IL-17A production and promoted S. aureus skin infection. We further demonstrate that IL-4 inhibited Il1b and Il23 expression in keratinocytes, acted on TCRγδ+ cells to inhibit their IL-17A production in response to IL-1β and IL-23, and blocked IL-17A–driven induction of neutrophil-attracting chemokines in keratinocytes. Furthermore, we show that IL-4 signaling blockade reversed the susceptibility of tape-stripped skin to S. aureus infection.

Results

Mechanical skin injury promotes superficial cutaneous infection by S. aureus. We examined the clearance of topically applied S. aureus from shaved skin without or with tape stripping. Tape stripping resulted in a significant increase in transepidermal water loss (TEWL) that persisted for 72 hours (Figure 1A), demonstrating effective disruption of the skin barrier. A total of 1 × 108 colony-forming units (CFU) of community-acquired methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA; parental strain USA300 SF8300) labeled with the fluorescent dye PSVue 794 were applied topically. The SF8300 MRSA strain used in this study was the most prevalent S. aureus strain causing infections in the United States in the early 2000s, is one of the better characterized MRSA strains, and is the one most commonly used in laboratory studies (30–32). Persistence of S. aureus was determined at 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours by in vivo fluorescence imaging, as well as by measuring the numbers of CFU in skin homogenates. S. aureus was virtually completely cleared from shaved skin 24 hours after its application, as evidenced by the extinction of PSVue 794 fluorescence (Figure 1B) and by the recovery of negligible numbers of CFU at 24 hours and none at 48 and 72 hours (Figure 1C). In contrast, the decay in PSVue 794 fluorescence was significantly slower after application of S. aureus to tape-stripped skin, persisting throughout 48 hours (Figure 1B). Moreover, the numbers of CFU recovered at 24 hours were more than half those applied on day 0, and viable S. aureus bacteria were consistently recovered at 48 and 72 hours (Figure 1C).

Mechanical skin injury promotes superficial cutaneous infection by S. aureuFigure 1

Mechanical skin injury promotes superficial cutaneous infection by S. aureus. (A) Effect of tape stripping on TEWL. (B) Representative in vivo fluorescence imaging (left) and quantitative analysis of the decay in PSVue 794 fluorescence (right) following topical application of 1 × 108 PSVue 794–labeled S. aureus strain USASF8300 to shaved and non–tape-stripped or shaved and tape-stripped (T/S) skin of BALB/c mice. (C) Numbers of colony forming units (CFU) in skin homogenates following application of 1 × 108 PSVue 794–labeled S. aureus strain USASF8300 to shaved or T/S skin of BALB/c mice. (D) Representative H&E staining (left) and quantitation of epidermal thickness of shaved or T/S skin sections from BALB/c mice 72 hours after application of saline or PSVue 794–labeled S. aureus strain USASF8300. Scale bar: 100 μm. (E) Gram staining of skin sections from the same experiment as in D. Red squares highlight Gram-positive bacteria. Scale bar: 50 μm. (F) Representative fluorescence images of sections of shaved or T/S skin of BALB/c mice 72 hours after application of saline or GFP-labeled S. aureus LAC strain. Yellow square highlights GFP+ bacteria; stars indicate autofluorescent hair follicles. Scale bar: 50 μm. Results in A–D are representative of 2 independent experiments with 4–5 mice/group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005, ***P < 0.001 by 1-tailed Student’s t test (A–C) or 1-way ANOVA (D).

Histologic examination of skin sections taken on day 3 revealed that tape stripping caused epidermal hyperplasia that was further increased by application of S. aureus (Figure 1D). Importantly, Gram staining revealed the presence of Gram-positive bacteria in the epidermis of tape-stripped, but not shaved, skin exposed to S. aureus (Figure 1E). Immunofluorescence examination on day 3 following topical application of GFP-expressing, community-acquired MRSA strain USA300 LAC revealed the presence of GFP+ bacteria in the epidermis of tape-stripped skin but not shaved skin (Figure 1F). Taken together, these results indicate that mechanical injury of skin promotes superficial cutaneous infection with S. aureus.

IL-17A from TCRγδ+ cells restrains S. aureus infection of mechanically injured skin. IL-17A is important for the clearance of intradermally injected S. aureus (8, 14). We examined the IL-17A response to superficial skin infection with S. aureus. Il17a expression was not detectable in shaved mouse skin but was minimally induced by tape stripping (Figure 2A). S. aureus application modestly upregulated Il17a expression in shaved skin (Figure 2A). In contrast, it caused a drastic increase in Il17a expression in tape-stripped skin (Figure 2A). S. aureus application to shaved skin caused minimal or no increase in the expression of the neutrophil-attracting chemokines Cxcl1, Cxcl2, and Cxcl3; modest neutrophil infiltration; and no detectable increase in the expression of the AMP-encoding genes cathelicidin AMP (Camp) and defensin beta 14 (Defb14) (Figure 2, B–D; and Supplemental Figure 1, A and B; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.149953DS1). Cxcl1, Cxcl2, and Cxcl3 expression; neutrophil infiltration; as well as Camp, Defb1, Defb3, Defb4, and Defb14 expression increased modestly after tape stripping but increased markedly after application of S. aureus to tape-stripped skin (Figure 2, B–D; and Supplemental Figure 1, A and B). These results indicate that S. aureus infection of mechanically injured skin causes a robust local IL-17A and AMP induction.

IL-17A from TCRγδ+ cells protects mechanically injured skin from superficiaFigure 2

IL-17A from TCRγδ+ cells protects mechanically injured skin from superficial infection by S. aureus. (A–D) Il17a expression (A), Cxcl1 expression (B), percentage of neutrophils (C), and Camp expression (D) in non–tape-stripped or tape-stripped (T/S) skin of BALB/c mice 24 hours after application of S. aureus (+) or saline (-) control. (E) Representative in vivo fluorescence imaging (left) and quantitative analysis of the PSVue 794 fluorescence 0 and 24 hours (right) following topical application of 1 × 108 PSVue 794 labeled S. aureus strain USASF8300 to shaved and tape stripped (T/S) skin of Il17a–/– mice and WT controls. (F) Numbers of CFU in skin homogenates 72 hours following application of 1 × 108 S. aureus strain USASF8300 to T/S skin of Il17a–/– mice and WT controls. (G–I) Cxcl1 expression (G), percentage of neutrophils among skin cells (H), and Camp expression (I) in T/S skin of Il17a–/– mice and WT controls 24 hours following application of 1 × 108 S. aureus to T/S skin of Il17a–/– mice and WT controls. (J–L) Il17a expression (J) and neutrophil infiltration (K) at 24 hours and numbers of CFU (L) at 72 hours in T/S skin from Tcrd–/– mice and WT controls following application of 1 × 108 S. aureus. n.d., not detected. Results in A–L are representative of 2 independent experiments with 4–5 mice/group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005, ***P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA (A–D) or 1-tailed Student’s t test (E–L). b2m, beta-2-microglobulin.

To investigate whether IL-17A restrains superficial skin infection by S. aureus, we examined Il17a–/– mice. Skin fluorescence 24 hours following application of PSVue 794-labeled S. aureus to tape-stripped skin was significantly higher in Il17a–/– mice compared with WT controls (Figure 2E). Moreover, the numbers of S. aureus CFU recovered from skin homogenates on day 3 were significantly higher in Il17a–/– mice compared with WT controls (Figure 2F). As expected, cutaneous expression of Cxcl1, Cxcl2, Cxcl3; neutrophil infiltration; and expression of Camp, Defb4, and Defb14 after S. aureus application to tape-stripped skin were all significantly reduced in Il17a–/– mice compared with WT controls (Figure 2, G–I, and Supplemental Figure 1C).

TCRγδ+ cells, CD4+TCRαβ+ Th17 cells, and ILC3s produce IL-17A (7). Tcrd–/– mice, which lack TCRγδ+ cells, but have normal numbers of TCRαβ+ cells and ILC3s, failed to upregulate cutaneous Il17a expression and had decreased neutrophil influx and higher loads of S. aureus following S. aureus application to tape-stripped skin (Figure 2, J–L). In addition, intracellular flow cytometry demonstrated that TCRγδ+ cells but not CD4+ T cells or ILC3s isolated from S. aureus–infected skin were the main source of IL-17A produced after PMA and ionomycin stimulation (Supplemental Figure 2). These results indicate the importance of IL-17A produced by TCRγδ+ cells in clearing S. aureus infection from mechanically injured skin.

IL-1 and IL-23 promote cutaneous Il17a expression in mechanically injured skin infected by S. aureus. The cytokines IL-1 and IL-23 drive IL-17A production by TCRγδ+ cells (16). Expression of Il1a, Il1b, and Il23p19 in tape-stripped skin markedly increased following application of S. aureus (Figure 3A). Keratinocytes express predominantly Il1a while both keratinocytes and myeloid cells express Il1b and Il23p19 (33–37). Il1a expression in tape-stripped skin exposed to S. aureus was confined predominantly to the epidermis. In contrast, Il1b was expressed predominantly in the dermis. Il23p19 was expressed in both layers but significantly more in epidermis than dermis (Figure 3B). Upregulation of Il23p19 expression in tape-stripped skin exposed to S. aureus was virtually abolished in Il1r1–/– mice (Figure 3C). Moreover, recombinant IL-1α (rIL-1α) induced Il23p19 expression in epidermal sheets from WT mice (Figure 3D), suggesting an autocrine loop was involved in IL-23 production by keratinocytes.

Epidermal cell–derived IL-1 and IL-23 promote cutaneous Il17a expression inFigure 3

Epidermal cell–derived IL-1 and IL-23 promote cutaneous Il17a expression in mechanically injured skin infected by S. aureus. (A and B) Il1a, Il1b, and Il23p19 expression in full-thickness skin (A) and epidermal and dermal sheets (B) 24 hours following application of 1 × 108 S. aureus to tape-stripped (T/S) skin of BALB/c mice. (C) Il23p19 expression in T/S skin 24 hours following topical application of 1 × 108 S. aureus in Il1r1–/– mice and WT controls. (D) Induction of Il23p19 expression in epidermal sheets of mouse skin by rIL-1α. (E) Il17a mRNA levels (left), percentages of neutrophils among skin cells (middle), and numbers of CFU (right) 72 hours following application of 1 × 108 S. aureus to T/S skin of Il1r1–/– mice and WT controls. (F) Il17a mRNA levels (left), percentages of neutrophils among skin cells (middle), and numbers of CFU (right) 72 hours following application of 1 × 108 S. aureus to T/S skin of WT BALB/c mice treated with anti–IL-23p19 antibody or isotype controls. Results in A–F are representative of 2 independent experiments with 4–5 mice/group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005 by 1-tailed Student’s t test.

The role of IL-1 and IL-23 in inducing a protective IL-17A response in S. aureus–infected, mechanically injured skin was examined in Il1r1–/– mice and following IL-23 blockade in WT mice, respectively. Cutaneous Il17a expression, neutrophil infiltration, and S. aureus clearance were significantly decreased in Il1r1–/– mice compared with WT controls as well as in mice treated with neutralizing anti–IL-23p19 antibody compared with mice treated with IgG isotype control (Figure 3, E and F). These results indicate that both IL-1 and IL-23 play an important role in driving IL-17A production by TCRγδ+ cells during superficial skin infection.

Basophil-derived IL-4 suppresses cutaneous Il17a expression and promotes S. aureus infection of mechanically injured skin. IL-4 impairs the induction and maintenance of adaptive Th17 immune responses (36). We investigated whether IL-4 suppresses the TCRγδ+ cell–dependent cutaneous IL-17A response that protects tape-stripped skin from superficial infection with S. aureus. Expression of Il4 was minimal in shaved skin and did not increase following application of S. aureus (Figure 4A). Tape stripping significantly increased Il4 expression in the skin; exposure to S. aureus increased it further (Figure 4A). Cutaneous expression of Il17a and of the chemokine Cxcl1 and of the AMP Camp following application of S. aureus to tape-stripped skin was significantly increased in Il4–/– mice compared with WT controls (Figure 4, B–D). Importantly, the numbers of S. aureus CFU recovered from skin homogenates after S. aureus application to tape-stripped skin were significantly decreased in Il4–/– mice compared with WT controls (Figure 4E).

Basophil-derived IL-4 suppresses cutaneous Il17a expression and promotes S.Figure 4

Basophil-derived IL-4 suppresses cutaneous Il17a expression and promotes S. aureus superficial infection of mechanically injured skin. (A) Cutaneous Il4 expression 24 hours following topical application of 1 × 108 S. aureus to shaved or shaved and tape-stripped (T/S) skin of BALB/c mice. (B–E) Cutaneous expression of Il17a (B), Cxcl1 (C), and Camp (D) at 24 hours, and numbers of CFU (E), 72 hours following topical application of S. aureus to T/S skin from Il4–/– mice and WT controls. (F) Representative flow cytometry analysis of CD117 and FcεRI expression by CD45+CD3– cells (left) and quantitation of CD45+CD3–FcεRI+CD117– basophils (right) in shaved and shaved and T/S skin of BALB/c mice 24 hours after application of S. aureus. (G) Quantitation of CD45+CD3–FcεRI+CD117– basophils in T/S skin of DT-treated Mcpt8DTR/+ and Mcpt8+/+ controls 24 hours after topical application of S. aureus. (H–J) Il4 expression (H) and Il17a expression (I) at 24 hours and numbers of CFU (J) in T/S skin of DT-treated Mcpt8DTR/+ and Mcpt8+/+ controls 72 hours after topical application of S. aureus. (K–P) Il4 expression (K), representative flow cytometry analysis of IL-4–producing basophils (left) and quantitation (right) (L), levels of Il1a mRNA (left) and IL-1α protein (right) (M), levels of Il1b mRNA (left) and IL-1α (right) (N), Il23 mRNA (left) and IL-23 (right) levels (O), and levels of Il17a mRNA (left) and IL-17A (right) (P) at 24 hours, and numbers of S. aureus CFU (Q), 72 hours after application of S. aureus to T/S skin of Mcpt8Cre/+ Il4fl/–Il13fl/+ mice and Il4fl/–Il13fl/+ controls. Results in A–P are representative of 2 independent experiments with 4–5 mice/group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005, ***P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA (A and F) or 1-tailed Student’s t test (B–E and H–Q).

Basophils are an important source of innate cell-derived IL-4 (38). Flow cytometry analysis of skin cell suspensions revealed that CD45+CD3–IgE+CD117– basophils accounted for less than 1% of CD45+CD3– cells in shaved mouse skin before and after application of S. aureus. This percentage significantly increased 24 hours after tape stripping and markedly increased following application of S. aureus to tape-stripped skin (Figure 4F). In contrast, tape stripping and S. aureus application caused minimal changes in the percentages of IgE+CD117+ mast cells in the skin (Figure 4F). To investigate whether basophils are a major source of IL-4 in tape-stripped skin, Mcpt8DTR/+ mice, which express diphtheria toxin receptor (DTR) selectively in basophils (39), and their Mcpt8+/+ littermates were treated with DT. The percentage of basophils in tape-stripped skin exposed to S. aureus was drastically decreased in DT-injected Mcpt8DTR/+ mice compared with DT-injected Mcpt8+/+ controls (Figure 4G). Importantly, Il4 expression in tape-stripped skin sites exposed to S. aureus was significantly diminished in DT-injected Mcpt8DTR/+ mice compared with controls (Figure 4H). In contrast, Il17a expression at these sites was significantly higher in DT-injected Mcpt8DTR/+ mice compared with controls (Figure 4I). Importantly, the numbers of CFU recovered from skin homogenates after S. aureus application to tape-stripped skin were significantly reduced in DT-injected Mcpt8DTR/+ mice compared with controls (Figure 4J).

To investigate the role of basophil-derived IL-4 in S. aureus colonization of mechanically injured skin, we generated Mcpt8cre/+ Il4fl/–13fl+ mice with selective ablation of IL-4 in basophils. To create this line, we crossed Mcpt8cre/+ mice on IL-4–deficient background (Mcpt8cre/+ Il4–/– mice) with Il4/13fl/fl mice. Mcpt8cre/+ Il4fl/–13fl/+ mice, but not Il4fl/+13fl/+ control littermates, failed to upregulate cutaneous Il4 expression after application of S. aureus to tape-stripped skin (Figure 4K). In addition, basophils from Mcpt8cre/+ Il4fl/–13fl/+ mice were severely impaired in their ability to produce IL-4 compared with basophils from Il4fl/+13fl/+ control littermates (Figure 4L). In contrast, cutaneous IL-1α, IL-1β, and IL-23 mRNA and protein levels at these sites were significantly increased in Mcpt8cre/+ Il4fl/–13fl/+ mice compared with controls (Figure 4, M–O). In addition, Mcpt8cre/+ Il4fl/–13fl/+ mice exhibited increased cutaneous IL-17A production, due to the increased percentage of IL-17A+TCRγδ+ cells infiltrating their infected skin (Figure 4P). Importantly, the numbers of S. aureus CFU recovered from skin homogenates after S. aureus application to tape-stripped skin were significantly reduced in Mcpt8cre/+ Il4fl/–13fl/+ mice compared with controls (Figure 4Q). Together, these results indicate that IL-4 derived from basophils recruited to mechanically injured skin promotes cutaneous infection with S. aureus.

IL-4 acts at multiple checkpoints to inhibit the protective cutaneous IL-17A response against superficial infection by S. aureus. Mechanical injury induced by tape stripping promotes the production of damage-associated molecular patterns and cytokines. These include TNF-α and hyaluronic acid (HA), which drive the expression of IL-1α and IL-23, respectively, in keratinocytes (33, 40). Keratinocytes express type II IL-4 receptor (IL-4R). The type II IL-4R binds both IL-4 and IL-13 and shares the IL-4Rα chain with the type I IL-4R, which binds IL-4 but not IL-13. Addition of rIL-4 inhibited TNF-α–driven Il1a expression as well as HA-driven Il23p19 expression by epidermal sheets from WT mice but not Ilr4a–/– mice (Figure 5, A and B). These in vitro findings suggested that IL-4 could inhibit cutaneous Il17a expression in response to S. aureus exposure by downregulating IL-1α and IL-23 production by keratinocytes. To test this hypothesis, we generated K14-CreTg/0 Il4rafl/– mice, which lack IL-4Rα selectively in keratinocytes. Cutaneous expression of Il1a, Il23p19, and Il17a following S. aureus application to tape-stripped skin was significantly increased in K14-CreTg/0 Il4rafl/– mice compared with K14-Il4rafl/– controls (Figure 5, C–E). Importantly, the numbers of CFU recovered from skin homogenates after S. aureus application to tape-stripped skin were significantly reduced in K14-CreTg/0 Il4rafl/– mice compared with controls (Figure 5F).

IL-4 acts at multiple checkpoints to inhibit the protective cutaneous IL-17Figure 5

IL-4 acts at multiple checkpoints to inhibit the protective cutaneous IL-17A response against superficial infection by S. aureus. (A and B) Effect of rIL-4 on the induction of Il1a by TNF-α (A) and Il23p19 by HA (B) in epidermal sheets from Il4ra–/– mice and WT controls. (C–F) Cutaneous expression of Il1a (C), Il23p19 (D), and Il17a (E) at 24 hours and numbers of CFU (F) in tape-stripped (T/S) skin of K14-CreTg/0 Il4rafl/– mice and Il4rafl/– controls 72 hours after topical application of 1 × 108 S. aureus. (G) Effect of IL-4 on IL-1β+IL-23–driven induction of Il17a expression in TCRγδ+ cells from Il4ra–/– mice and WT controls. (H) Effect of IL-4 on IL-17A–driven induction of Cxcl1 expression in epidermal sheets from Il4ra–/– mice and WT controls. Results in A–H are representative of 2 independent experiments with 4–5 mice/group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005, ***P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA (A, B, G, and H) or 1-tailed Student’s t test (C–F).

TCRγδ+ cells, the major producers of IL-17A in mechanically injured skin exposed to S. aureus, express type I IL-4R (41). We investigated whether IL-4 has a direct effect on Il17a expression by TCRγδ+ cells following stimulation with IL-1 and IL-23. rIL-4 markedly inhibited IL-1β+IL-23–driven Il17a expression by TCRγδ+ cells sorted from the skin of WT mice but not Ilr4a–/– mice (Figure 5G).

Keratinocytes are a major target for IL-17A–driven expression of neutrophil-attracting chemokines (42). We examined whether IL-4 has a direct effect on IL-17A–driven expression of the neutrophil chemoattractant Cxcl1 by keratinocytes. rIL-4 inhibited IL-17A–driven expression of the neutrophil-attracting chemokine Cxcl1 by epidermal sheets from WT mice but not Ilr4a–/– mice (Figure 5H). The above results suggest that IL-4 may act at multiple checkpoints to inhibit the protective cutaneous IL-17A response of mechanically injured skin to S. aureus and consequently promote infection.

IL-4Rα blockade protects mechanically injured skin from superficial S. aureus infection. IL-4Rα blockade by mAb is approved for human use. We investigated whether IL-4Rα blockade could protect against S. aureus infection of mechanically injured skin. Mice were administered rat anti–mouse IL-4Rα–blocking mAb or IgG isotype control 2 hours prior to application of S. aureus to tape-stripped skin. Cutaneous expression of Il1a, Il23p19, and Il17a as well as neutrophil infiltration were significantly higher in S. aureus–exposed, tape-stripped skin of recipients of the IL-4Rα–blocking antibody compared with recipients of IgG isotype control (Figure 6, A and B). However, there were no significant changes in Il4 mRNA levels or in the percentages of TCRγδ+ cells and basophils following IL-4Rα antibody blockade (Supplemental Figure 3). Importantly, IL-4Rα blockade significantly reduced the numbers of S. aureus CFU recovered from the skin (Figure 6C). These results indicate that IL-4 signaling blockade restrains S. aureus infection of mechanically injured skin.

IL-4R blockade protects mechanically injured skin from superficial S. aureuFigure 6

IL-4R blockade protects mechanically injured skin from superficial S. aureus infection. (A–C) Cutaneous expression of Il1a, Il23p19, and Il17a (A); neutrophil infiltration in the skin (B) at 24 hours; and numbers of CFU (C) 72 hours after topical application of 1 × 108 S. aureus strain to tape-stripped (T/S) skin of WT recipients of anti–IL-4Rα antibody or IgG isotype control. Results in A–C are representative of 2 independent experiments with 4–5 mice/group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005 by 1-tailed Student’s t test.

Discussion

We have uncovered an important role for basophil-derived IL-4 in promoting superficial skin infection with S. aureus. Our results demonstrate that basophils are recruited following exposure of S. aureus on tape-stripped skin and that basophil-derived IL-4 acts at multiple checkpoints to inhibit the IL-17A response of TCRγδ+ T cells that protects against infection. Importantly, we show that IL-4Rα blockade, currently in use for the treatment of patients with AD, protects tape-stripped skin from superficial S. aureus infection.

Shaved but otherwise intact mouse skin was resistant to the establishment of superficial skin infection by S. aureus. In contrast, mouse skin mechanically injured by tape stripping was permissive for S. aureus superficial skin infection. Like intradermal and subcutaneous infection with S. aureus, superficial S. aureus skin infection elicited a TCRγδ+ cell–dependent protective local IL-17A response that promoted neutrophil recruitment and AMP production, both of which are important for the clearance of S. aureus (7, 8, 14, 43). IL-1 and IL-23, which may be derived in part from keratinocytes, were required for the induction of IL-17A following S. aureus infection of mechanically injured skin, consistent with the important role of these 2 cytokines in the induction of IL-17A in inflammation, infections, and wound healing (16, 18, 19, 34). IL-1 signaling was required for the optimal induction of cutaneous Il23p19 expression in skin superficially infected with S. aureus. This is in line with a recent report indicating that recombinant IL-1R antagonist decreases Il23p19 expression and neutrophil recruitment into the skin induced by ablation of corneodesmosin (44).

We have shown that basophils are recruited to mechanically injured skin exposed to S. aureus and partially block the IL-17A/neutrophil recruitment axis that protects against superficial skin infection. In agreement with this result, acute depletion of basophils exacerbates mouse models of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and colitis mediated by IL-17A and neutrophils (26, 28, 45). Other studies have shown that basophils promote type 17 immune responses by producing IL-6 and that chronic depletion of basophils exacerbates the lupus phenotype in MRL-lpr/lpr mice and the severity of EAE in WT mice (25, 27). Thus, basophils may play a context-dependent dual role in the in vivo IL-17 response, initially suppressing its induction, then once it is established, supporting its maintenance.

Basophils are a key source of IL-4 under steady-state as well as pathological conditions (38). Our results demonstrate that basophils are the main source of IL-4 in skin superficially infected with S. aureus and that basophil-derived IL-4 dampens the protective IL-17A response against infection. This inhibition is in line with the known role of IL-4 in suppressing in type 17 responses. IL-4 suppresses IL-17A expression by CD4+ T cells as well as the in vitro production of the IL-17–inducing cytokines IL-23p19, IL-1β, and IL-6 by DCs and keratinocytes (24, 36). In vivo, treatment with rIL-4 improves disease severity in mouse models of EAE and psoriasis, 2 disease models associated with a type 17 immune response (36, 46, 47).

Keratinocytes have emerged as important players in cutaneous immune responses, as they respond to autocrine and paracrine cytokines by producing cytokines, chemokines, and AMP. We show that IL-4 suppresses Il1a, Il23p19, and Cxcl1 expression by epidermal sheets in response to in vitro stimulation with TNF-α, HA, and IL-17A, respectively. Importantly, mice lacking IL-4Rα selectively in keratinocytes demonstrated increased cutaneous expression of the cytokines Il1a, Il23p19, and Il17a in mechanically injured skin exposed to S. aureus. In line with these results, IL-4 inhibits TNF-α– as well as IFN-γ–driven expression of AMP-encoding genes by keratinocytes (48). It also suppresses the production of IL-1β and the AMP hBD2 in epidermal cells from patients with psoriasis (49), who exhibit increased IL-4Rα expression by epidermal cells (50). Together, these results suggest that IL-4 signaling in keratinocytes inhibits cutaneous IL-17A induction and plays a counterpoint to IL-17 signaling in these cells, possibly in an attempt to restore homeostasis in inflamed skin.

The diversity of the skin microbiome and its interactions with pathogenic microorganisms shape the immune response and limit the growth of pathogens (51–53). We cannot exclude that perturbation of skin microbiome induced by tape stripping or in mice with deficiencies in cells or cytokines could affect the establishment of cutaneous S. aureus infection. Furthermore, different S. aureus strains produce different virulence factors and toxins that could alter the protective immune response differently than the S. aureus SF8300 strain we used.

Administration of dupilumab, a human mAb against IL-4Rα, to patients with AD ameliorates the disease and results in improved local and systemic disease markers, as well as a decrease in S. aureus colonization of the skin (54–57). It is difficult to dissect the exact mechanisms by which IL-4Rα blockade reduces the S. aureus cutaneous burden in patients with AD. We demonstrate that IL-4Rα blockade increases Il17a expression and promotes bacterial clearance from the skin in our mouse model of acute superficial infection with S. aureus. This is of clinical relevance because it suggests that IL-4R blockade might represent an effective therapeutic approach to inhibit S. aureus skin colonization or prevent S. aureus SSTIs.

Methods

Mice. BALB/c and C57BL/6J WT mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories. Rag2–/– mice were purchased from Taconic. Il17a–/– mice were previously described (58). Tcrd–/–, Il1r1–/–, Il4–/–, and Il4ra–/– mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. Il4/13fl/fl mice were a gift of Andrew McKenzie (Medical Research Council, Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom). Mcpt8DTR mice were a gift of TMDU and TMDU Advanced Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan. Il4rafl/fl mice was a gift from International Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cape Town, and South Africa Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa. Mcpt8cre/+ mice on C57BL/6J background were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory and crossed with Il4–/– mice on BALB/c background for 8 generations, then crossed with Il4/13fl/fl mice in BALB/c background. K14-CreTg/0 mice on C57BL/6J background were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory and crossed with Il4ra–/– in BALB/c background for 9 generations, then crossed with Il4rafl/fl mice in BALB/c background. All mice were kept in a pathogen-free environment.

Skin cell preparation and flow cytometry. Skin pieces (1 cm2) from unmanipulated, tape-stripped, or S. aureus–infected mice were obtained. Skin pieces were finely chopped using scissors after fat removal and digested for 90 minutes in media containing liberase (Roche) and DNAse II (MilliporeSigma), with continuous shaking at 37°C. Digested skin homogenates were filtered, washed, and resuspended in PBS and used for flow cytometry. Cells were preincubated with Fcγ receptor–specific blocking mAb (clone 2.4G2, BioLegend) and washed before staining with the following mAbs: Alexa Fluor 700–anti–CD45 (clone 30-F11, BioLegend), BV605–anti-CD11b (clone M1/70, BioLegend), FITC–anti-Gr1 (clone RB6-8C5, BioLegend), CD3–efluor 450 (clone 17A2, eBioscience), IgE-PE (RME-1, BioLegend), and CD117-APC (clone ACK2, eBioscience). Cells were analyzed on LSR Fortessa (BD Biosciences), and the data were analyzed with FlowJo software.

Quantitative reverse transcription PCR. At indicated times after tape stripping or S. aureus infection, total skin and epidermal and dermal sheet RNA was extracted with Total RNA Isolation Kit (Ambion). cDNA was prepared with iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad). PCR reactions were run on an ABI Prism 7300 (Applied Biosystems) sequence detection system platform. TaqMan primers and probes were obtained from Life Technologies. The housekeeping gene β2-microglobulin was used as an internal control.

S. aureus and quantification of skin infection. The community-acquired MRSA USA300 SF8300 strain, a gift of Binh Diep (UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA) and the GFP-producing USA300 LAC strain (59) were cultured in tryptic soy broth as previously described. Briefly, a S. aureus inoculum was streaked onto a tryptic soy agar plate and grown overnight at 37°C. Single colonies were picked and inoculated into a 5 mL tube containing tryptic soy broth and cultured overnight in a shaking incubator. The following morning, 1:50 dilution of bacterial suspension was inoculated in 5 mL of tryptic soy broth and cultured for another 2 hours. Bacterial concentrations were estimated by measuring absorbance at 600 nm. The bacteria were concentrated to 108 CFU/50 μL of PBS and used for cutaneous infection. CFUs were verified by overnight culturing of inoculum on CHROMagar plates. To enumerate the bacterial load in vivo, S. aureus was labeled with the PSVue794 reagent kit (LI-COR), following manufacturer’s instructions. PSVue794 fluorescence was quantified at different time points using Pearl Trilogy Small Animal Imaging System (LI-COR). To enumerate the bacterial load from the skin, two 8 mm2 skin biopsies were obtained. After mechanical homogenization, serial dilutions of skin homogenates were cultured overnight on CHROMagar plates. The growth of USA300 strain was quantified by counting only pink colonies.

DTR-mediated cell depletion. Mcpt8DTR mice received an i.p. injection of DT (750 ng per 20 g body weight) 2 days before S. aureus application to tape-stripped skin.

IL-23 and IL-4Rα blockade. Mice were injected i.v. with 100 μg of rat monoclonal anti–mouse IL-23p19 antibody (Bio X Cell) or with 100 μg of rat monoclonal anti–mouse IL-4Rα antibody (BD Biosciences) 2 hours before S. aureus application to tape-stripped skin.

Preparation of epidermal and dermal sheets and culture. Ears from mice were split into dorsal and ventral halves, then floated for 30 minutes at 37°C on PBS containing 4 mg/mL dispase (MilliporeSigma). Dermal and epidermal sheets were split and stored at –80°C for RNA analysis. Epidermal sheets were cultured with overnight HA (10 μg/mL), rIL-1 (10 ng/mL), rTNF-α (20 ng/mL), rIL-17A (50 ng/mL), and/or rIL-4 (50 ng/mL).

Histology. For H&E and Gram staining, skin specimens were fixed in 4% PFA and embedded in paraffin. Sections (5 μm) of skin were stained with H&E or Gram stained by the Rodent Histopathology Core at Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center. For fluorescence microscopy, 10 μm cryosections were fixed in 4% PFA and permeabilized using BD Biosciences Cytoperm Permeabilization buffer, and then slides were mounted using mounting medium containing DAPI (ProLong Gold) from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Pictures were captured using EVOS cell imaging systems.

Statistics. Statistical significance was determined by 1-tailed Student’s t test or 1-way ANOVA on GraphPad Prism. All the figures display mean ± SEM. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Study approval. All procedures performed on the mice were in accordance with and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Boston Children’s Hospital.

Author contributions

JMLC and RSG conceived the project and supervised the experiments. JMLC, MD, JK, MS, SS, and DSHW performed, analyzed, and interpreted results of the experiments. ARH, HK, FB, and LSM contributed critical reagents or mice. JMLC and RSG wrote the manuscript.

Supplemental material

View Supplemental data

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the NIH/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Atopic Dermatitis Research Network grant U19AI117673 and NIH grant AI113294-01A1. JMLC was supported by a NIAID T32 training grant (5T32AI007512-32), a postdoctoral fellowship from CONACYT (Mexico), and a Boston Children’s Hospital OFD/BTREC/CTREC Faculty Career Development Fellowship. We thank Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center in Boston, Massachusetts, USA, for the service provided by the Rodent Histopathology Core. Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center is supported in part by an NIH/National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant (NIH 5 P30 CA06516).

Address correspondence to: Juan-Manuel Leyva-Castillo or Raif S. Geha, Boston Children’s Hospital, Division of Immunology, One Blackfan Circle, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: 617.919.2482; Email: Manuel.LeyvaCastillo@childrens.harvard.edu (JMLC). Email: Raif.Geha@childrens.harvard.edu (RSG). JK’s present address is: Department of Dermatology and Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. SS’s present address is: Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. DSHW’s present address is: Department of Biochemistry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. LSM’s present address is: Immunology, Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: LSM is a full-time employee of Janssen Pharmaceuticals and may hold Johnson & Johnson stock and stock options. LSM received prior grant support from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and Moderna Therapeutics; was a paid consultant for Armirall and Janssen Research and Development; was on the scientific advisory board of Integrated Biotherapeutics; and is a shareholder of Noveome Biotherapeutics, all of which are developing therapeutics against infections (including Staphylococcus aureus and other pathogens) and/or inflammatory conditions.

Copyright: © 2021, Leyva-Castillo et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reference information: JCI Insight. 2021;6(21):e149953.https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.149953.

References
  1. Moran GJ, et al. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections among patients in the emergency department. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(7):666–674.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Hiramatsu K, et al. Multi-drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and future chemotherapy. J Infect Chemother. 2014;20(10):593–601.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Tong SY, et al. Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28(3):603–661.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Geoghegan JA, et al. Staphylococcus aureus and atopic dermatitis: a complex and evolving relationship. Trends Microbiol. 2018;26(6):484–497.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Breen JD, Karchmer AW. Staphylococcus aureus infections in diabetic patients. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1995;9(1):11–24.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Crum-Cianflone NF, et al. Increasing rates of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections among HIV-infected persons. Int J STD AIDS. 2007;18(8):521–526.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Jin W, Dong C. IL-17 cytokines in immunity and inflammation. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2013;2(9):e60.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Cho JS, et al. IL-17 is essential for host defense against cutaneous Staphylococcus aureus infection in mice. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(5):1762–1773.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. McDonald DR. TH17 deficiency in human disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;129(6):1429–1435.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Rigby KM, DeLeo FR. Neutrophils in innate host defense against Staphylococcus aureus infections. Semin Immunopathol. 2012;34(2):237–259.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Molne L, et al. Role of neutrophil leukocytes in cutaneous infection caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. 2000;68(11):6162–6167.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Malhotra N, et al. IL-22 derived from γδ T cells restricts Staphylococcus aureus infection of mechanically injured skin. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;138(4):1098–1107.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Verdrengh M, Tarkowski A. Role of neutrophils in experimental septicemia and septic arthritis induced by Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. 1997;65(7):2517–2521.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Marchitto MC, et al. Clonal Vγ6+Vδ4+ T cells promote IL-17-mediated immunity against Staphylococcus aureus skin infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(22):10917–10926.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Martin B, et al. Interleukin-17-producing γδ T cells selectively expand in response to pathogen products and environmental signals. Immunity. 2009;31(2):321–330.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Sutton CE, et al. Interleukin-1 and IL-23 induce innate IL-17 production from γδ T cells, amplifying Th17 responses and autoimmunity. Immunity. 2009;31(2):331–341.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Sutton C, et al. A crucial role for interleukin (IL)-1 in the induction of IL-17-producing T cells that mediate autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Exp Med. 2006;203(7):1685–1691.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  18. Lubberts E. The IL-23-IL-17 axis in inflammatory arthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015;11(7):415–429.
    View this article via: CrossRef Google Scholar
  19. Gaffen SL, et al. The IL-23-IL-17 immune axis: from mechanisms to therapeutic testing. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14(9):585–600.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Fragoulis GE, et al. Therapeutic targeting of IL-17 and IL-23 cytokines in immune-mediated diseases. Annu Rev Med. 2016;67:337–353.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Ali A, et al. IL-1 Receptor antagonist treatment aggravates Staphylococcal septic arthritis and sepsis in mice. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0131645.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Mayer-Barber KD, Yan B. Clash of the cytokine titans: counter-regulation of interleukin-1 and type I interferon-mediated inflammatory responses. Cell Mol Immunol. 2017;14(1):22–35.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Karasuyama H, et al. Multifaceted roles of basophils in health and disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;142(2):370–380.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Cooney LA, et al. Sensitivity and resistance to regulation by IL-4 during Th17 maturation. J Immunol. 2011;187(9):4440–4450.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Hermann FJ, et al. Basophils inhibit proliferation of CD4+ T cells in autologous and allogeneic mixed lymphocyte reactions and limit disease activity in a murine model of graft versus host disease. Immunology. 2015;145(2):202–212.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Pan Q, et al. Basophil activation-dependent autoantibody and interleukin-17 production exacerbate systemic lupus erythematosus. Front Immunol. 2017;8:348.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Yuk CM, et al. Basophil-derived IL-6 regulates TH17 cell differentiation and CD4 T cell immunity. Sci Rep. 2017;7:41744.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Musio S, et al. Treatment with anti-FcεRIα antibody exacerbates EAE and T-cell immunity against myelin. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2017;4(3):e342.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  29. Piliponsky AM, et al. Basophil-derived tumor necrosis factor can enhance survival in a sepsis model in mice. Nat Immunol. 2019;20(2):129–140.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Diep BA, et al. Complete genome sequence of USA300, an epidemic clone of community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet. 2006;367(9512):731–739.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  31. O’Hara FP, et al. Molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus in the United States 2004-2008 reveals the rapid expansion of USA300 among inpatients and outpatients. Microb Drug Resist. 2012;18(6):555–561.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  32. Vitko NP, Richardson AR. Laboratory maintenance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2013;Chapter 9:Unit 9C.2.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  33. Yoon J, et al. IL-23 induced in keratinocytes by endogenous TLR4 ligands polarizes dendritic cells to drive IL-22 responses to skin immunization. J Exp Med. 2016;213(10):2147–2166.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  34. Miller LS, et al. Inflammasome-mediated production of IL-1beta is required for neutrophil recruitment against Staphylococcus aureus in vivo. J Immunol. 2007;179(10):6933–6942.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  35. Archer NK, et al. Injury, dysbiosis, and filaggrin deficiency drive skin inflammation through keratinocyte IL-1α release. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;143(4):1426–1443.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Guenova E, et al. IL-4 abrogates T(H)17 cell-mediated inflammation by selective silencing of IL-23 in antigen-presenting cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(7):2163–2168.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  37. Cho JS, et al. Neutrophil-derived IL-1β is sufficient for abscess formation in immunity against Staphylococcus aureus in mice. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(11):e1003047.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Yamanishi Y, Karasuyama H. Basophil-derived IL-4 plays versatile roles in immunity. Semin Immunopathol. 2016;38(5):615–622.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Wada T, et al. Selective ablation of basophils in mice reveals their nonredundant role in acquired immunity against ticks. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(8):2867–2875.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  40. Kutsch CL, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha induces interleukin-1 alpha and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist production by cultured human keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol. 1993;101(1):79–85.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Bloodworth MH, et al. STAT6 signaling attenuates interleukin-17-producing γδ T cells during acute Klebsiella pneumoniae infection. Infect Immun. 2016;84(5):1548–1555.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  42. Nograles KE, et al. Th17 cytokines interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-22 modulate distinct inflammatory and keratinocyte-response pathways. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159(5):1092–1102.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  43. Das S, Khader S. Yin and yang of interleukin-17 in host immunity to infection. F1000Res. 2017;6:741.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  44. Li J, et al. Counterregulation between thymic stromal lymphopoietin- and IL-23-driven immune axes shapes skin inflammation in mice with epidermal barrier defects. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;138(1):150–161.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  45. Wakahara K, et al. Human basophils interact with memory T cells to augment Th17 responses. Blood. 2012;120(24):4761–4771.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  46. Falcone M, et al. A critical role for IL-4 in regulating disease severity in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis as demonstrated in IL-4-deficient C57BL/6 mice and BALB/c mice. J Immunol. 1998;160(10):4822–4830.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  47. Hahn M, Ghoreschi K. The role of IL-4 in psoriasis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2017;13(3):171–173.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  48. Albanesi C, et al. IL-4 and IL-13 negatively regulate TNF-alpha- and IFN-gamma-induced beta-defensin expression through STAT-6, suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS)-1, and SOCS-3. J Immunol. 2007;179(2):984–992.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  49. Onderdijk AJ, et al. IL-4 Downregulates IL-1β and IL-6 and induces GATA3 in psoriatic epidermal cells: route of action of a Th2 cytokine. J Immunol. 2015;195(4):1744–1752.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  50. Prens E, et al. Increased expression of interleukin-4 receptors on psoriatic epidermal cells. Am J Pathol. 1996;148(5):1493–1502.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  51. Scharschmidt TC. Establishing tolerance to commensal skin bacteria: timing is everything. Dermatol Clin. 2017;35(1):1–9.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  52. Paller AS, et al. The microbiome in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;143(1):26–35.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  53. Byrd AL, et al. The human skin microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16(3):143–155.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  54. Hamilton JD, et al. Dupilumab improves the molecular signature in skin of patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134(6):1293–1300.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  55. Guttman-Yassky E, et al. Dupilumab progressively improves systemic and cutaneous abnormalities in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;143(1):155–172.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  56. Beck LA, et al. Dupilumab treatment in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(2):130–139.
    View this article via: CrossRef Google Scholar
  57. Callewaert C, et al. IL-4Rα blockade by dupilumab decreases Staphylococcus aureus colonization and increases microbial diversity in atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol. 2020;140(1):191–202.E7.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  58. Nakae S, et al. Antigen-specific T cell sensitization is impaired in IL-17-deficient mice, causing suppression of allergic cellular and humoral responses. Immunity. 2002;17(3):375–387.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  59. Pang YY, et al. agr-Dependent interactions of Staphylococcus aureus USA300 with human polymorphonuclear neutrophils. J Innate Immun. 2010;2(6):546–559.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (November 8, 2021): Electronic publication

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts