Research ArticleImmunologyTransplantation Free access | 10.1172/jci.insight.128560
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
2Department of Hand and Microsurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan, China.
3Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, and
4Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Address correspondence to: Gerald Brandacher, Ross Research Building/Room 749D, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. Phone: 1.443.287.6679; Email: brandacher@jhmi.edu.
Authorship note: BCO and GJF contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Oh, B. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
2Department of Hand and Microsurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan, China.
3Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, and
4Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Address correspondence to: Gerald Brandacher, Ross Research Building/Room 749D, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. Phone: 1.443.287.6679; Email: brandacher@jhmi.edu.
Authorship note: BCO and GJF contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by
Furtmüller, G.
in:
JCI
|
PubMed
|
Google Scholar
|
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
2Department of Hand and Microsurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan, China.
3Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, and
4Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Address correspondence to: Gerald Brandacher, Ross Research Building/Room 749D, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. Phone: 1.443.287.6679; Email: brandacher@jhmi.edu.
Authorship note: BCO and GJF contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Fryer, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
2Department of Hand and Microsurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan, China.
3Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, and
4Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Address correspondence to: Gerald Brandacher, Ross Research Building/Room 749D, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. Phone: 1.443.287.6679; Email: brandacher@jhmi.edu.
Authorship note: BCO and GJF contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Guo, Y. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
2Department of Hand and Microsurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan, China.
3Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, and
4Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Address correspondence to: Gerald Brandacher, Ross Research Building/Room 749D, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. Phone: 1.443.287.6679; Email: brandacher@jhmi.edu.
Authorship note: BCO and GJF contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Messner, F. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
2Department of Hand and Microsurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan, China.
3Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, and
4Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Address correspondence to: Gerald Brandacher, Ross Research Building/Room 749D, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. Phone: 1.443.287.6679; Email: brandacher@jhmi.edu.
Authorship note: BCO and GJF contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Krapf, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
2Department of Hand and Microsurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan, China.
3Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, and
4Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Address correspondence to: Gerald Brandacher, Ross Research Building/Room 749D, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. Phone: 1.443.287.6679; Email: brandacher@jhmi.edu.
Authorship note: BCO and GJF contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Schneeberger, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
2Department of Hand and Microsurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan, China.
3Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, and
4Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Address correspondence to: Gerald Brandacher, Ross Research Building/Room 749D, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. Phone: 1.443.287.6679; Email: brandacher@jhmi.edu.
Authorship note: BCO and GJF contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by
Cooney, D.
in:
JCI
|
PubMed
|
Google Scholar
|
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
2Department of Hand and Microsurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan, China.
3Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, and
4Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Address correspondence to: Gerald Brandacher, Ross Research Building/Room 749D, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. Phone: 1.443.287.6679; Email: brandacher@jhmi.edu.
Authorship note: BCO and GJF contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by
Lee, W.
in:
JCI
|
PubMed
|
Google Scholar
|
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
2Department of Hand and Microsurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan, China.
3Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, and
4Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Address correspondence to: Gerald Brandacher, Ross Research Building/Room 749D, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. Phone: 1.443.287.6679; Email: brandacher@jhmi.edu.
Authorship note: BCO and GJF contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Raimondi, G. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
2Department of Hand and Microsurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan, China.
3Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, and
4Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Address correspondence to: Gerald Brandacher, Ross Research Building/Room 749D, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. Phone: 1.443.287.6679; Email: brandacher@jhmi.edu.
Authorship note: BCO and GJF contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Brandacher, G. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Authorship note: BCO and GJF contributed equally to this work.
Published April 9, 2020 - More info
Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) has become a valid therapeutic option to restore form and function after devastating tissue loss. However, the need for high-dose multidrug immunosuppression to maintain allograft survival is still hampering more widespread application of VCA. In this study, we investigated the immunoregulatory potential of costimulation blockade (CoB; CTLA4-Ig and anti-CD154 mAb) combined with nonmyeoablative total body irradiation (TBI) to promote allograft survival of VCA in a fully MHC-mismatched mouse model of orthotopic hind limb transplantation. Compared with untreated controls (median survival time [MST] 8 days) and CTLA4-Ig treatment alone (MST 17 days), CoB treatment increased graft survival (MST 82 days), and the addition of nonmyeloablative TBI led to indefinite graft survival (MST > 210 days). Our analysis suggests that VCA-derived BM induced mixed chimerism in animals treated with CoB and TBI + CoB, promoting gradual deletion of alloreactive T cells as the underlying mechanism of long-term allograft survival. Acceptance of donor-matched secondary skin grafts, decreased ex vivo T cell responsiveness, and increased graft-infiltrating Tregs further indicated donor-specific tolerance induced by TBI + CoB. In summary, our data suggest that vascularized BM-containing VCAs are immunologically favorable grafts promoting chimerism induction and long-term allograft survival in the context of CoB.
Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) has become a clinical reality, with more than 130 hand/forearm/arm transplants and 40 face transplants performed worldwide with highly encouraging immunological and functional outcomes (1). Despite these successes, wider utilization of VCA is hindered by the need for long-term, high-dose immunosuppression. Thus, there is an imminent need to develop novel strategies to maintain graft survival while reducing adverse effects and toxicities of conventional immunosuppression. The use of costimulation blockade (CoB) via biologic agents such as the recombinant Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 Ig (CTLA4-Ig) — e.g., abatacept and belatacept, which block T-cell costimulation — have been developed to overcome these limitations.
CTLA4-Ig has shown considerable efficacy in preventing rejection of solid organ transplants in preclinical models and clinical trials (2–6). However, CTLA4-Ig alone cannot induce long-term graft survival or tolerance in any stringent murine transplant model (e.g., Balb/C into C57BL/6) (7, 8). As shown in various small and large animal models of solid organ and skin transplantation, the addition of anti-CD154 mAb or donor-specific transfusion (DST) to CTLA4-Ig treatment prevented acute and chronic rejection and led to long-term allograft survival and tolerance (7, 9–12). In particular, the combination of CoB with BM transplantation (BMT) has been an effective means to establish mixed chimerism and induce tolerance in rodent models (13, 14). This finding carries increased relevance in VCA, as certain composite tissue allografts comprise vascularized BM (vBM), a graft component that could confer the inherent ability to promote tolerance by inducing mixed chimerism when combined with CoB treatment — a feature distinctly not present in solid organ transplantation. Therefore, the focus of this study was to test the efficacy of CoB on allograft survival and the investigation of mechanisms underlying the promotion of immunological tolerance in a murine model of transplantation of vBM-containing allografts.
Here, we were able to report on means to induce long-term allograft survival without the requirement of conventional maintenance immunosuppressive therapy in the context of CoB and VCA. In addition, we showed unique insight into chimerism-based long-term VCA survival promoted by a vBM-containing allograft and CoB in a fully MHC-mismatched mouse model.
CoB promotes VCA survival. To test the effect of CoB on VCA survival, we used our recently reported murine orthotopic hind limb transplant model (15) performed across a full MHC barrier: from Balb/C (H-2d) into C57BL/6 (H-2b) (Figure 1, A–C). Treatment with CTLA4-Ig alone showed prolonged VCA survival (median survival time [MST] 17 days) as compared with untreated controls (MST 8 days; P < 0.01). Combined CoB treatment with CTLA4-Ig + MR1 (CoB) significantly increased VCA survival (MST 82 days; P < 0.01) compared with untreated controls and animals receiving CTLA4-Ig only. The addition of 250 cGy of nonmyeloablative total body irradiation (TBI) led to indefinite allograft survival without clinical rejection episodes (MST > 210 days; P < 0.01) (Figure 1D). Controls that only received nonmyeloablative TBI showed a MST of 13.3 days (Supplemental Figure 1; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.128560DS1).
Experimental design, treatment regimen, and vascularized composite allograft survival. (A and B) An orthotopic hind limb transplantation model based on the nonsuture cuff technique was used to allow for clinical allograft survival monitoring. (A) Representative image of microvascular anastomosis using polyethylene cuff tubes. (B) Long-term survivor on POD 120. (C) Schematic representation of the transplant strategy implemented and the different treatment strategies investigated. These included combination of total body irradiation, CTLA4-Ig, and anti-CD154 mAb (MR1). mixed chimerism analyses combined with other in vitro assays were performed as outlined. (D) Hind limb allograft survival was prolonged with CTLA4-Ig and MR1 without total body irradiation treatment (MST 82 days, n = 8; MST >210 days, n = 6; P = 0.0008), while untreated and CTLA4-Ig only–treated recipients showed acute rejection at MST of 8 days (n = 5) and 15 days (n = 4). P values were calculated by log-rank test (D).
Histologic analysis correlated well with clinical graft survival. In untreated controls, signs of rejection — including epidermolysis and massive mononuclear cell infiltration — were present at postoperative day (POD) 7 (Figure 2, A and B). CTLA4-Ig only–treated recipients showed Grade 3 rejection with a diffuse cellular infiltrate on H&E staining (Figure 2C). However, around 50% of recipients treated with CoB showed only mild infiltration in the dermis, without clinical evidence of skin rejection episodes at POD 70 (Figure 2, D and E). Recipients receiving TBI + CoB showed neither clinical rejection signs nor cellular infiltration (Figure 2, F–H). In both groups, no donor specific antibodies (DSA) formation was detectable (mean fluorescence intensity [MFI] ± SEM) at POD 70 (CTLA4-Ig + MR1, 1049 ± 118.5, vs. TBI + CTLA4-Ig + MR1, 1028 ± 50.13; nontransplanted control, 1051 ± 90.47, vs. positive control [serum collected 70 days after allo-skin rejection], 11041 ± 1133). These results suggest that CoB promotes immune-modulatory mechanisms intrinsic to the VCA model — in particular, when considering the limited efficacy of CoB on the survival of full-thickness skin transplants as previously reported (16).
Representative H&E staining. (A and B) Soft tissues of the hind limb of a naive control animal are compared with transplanted hind limb allografts in untreated control animals on POD7 and compared with animals treated with various treatment combinations. (C) CTLA4-Ig only (POD 15). (D) CoB (POD 50). (E) CoB (POD 70). (F) TBI + CoB (POD 50). (G) TBI + CoB (POD 70). (H) TBI + CoB (POD 120). Scale bar: 100 μm. Original magnification, ×100. Inset magnification, ×400 with arrows to indicate cellular infiltration.
CoB promotes multilineage donor chimerism. Donor chimerism emerged as a key element of successful tolerance induction protocols in solid organ transplantation (17). Therefore, we tested the ability of a vBM containing allograft to induce donor-specific chimerism. We analyzed the presence of donor-derived PBMCs among all PBMCs at multiple time points after transplantation using flow cytometry. Microchimerism was detectable on POD 7 (percentage of CD11b+H-2d+ [mean ± SEM]; 0.752% ± 0.386%) but disappeared by POD 13 (percentage of CD11b+H-2d+; 0.016% ± 0.006%) in untreated controls. In CTLA4-Ig–treated recipients, mixed chimerism was detectable up to POD 13 (percentage of CD11b+H-2d+; 0.6427% ± 1.347%) and then disappeared as the VCA was rejected (Figure 3C). Similar patterns were detected for donor-derived (H-2d+–derived) CD3+ T cells and B220+ B cells in both groups (Figure 3, A and B). In recipients treated with the CoB regimen, the percentage of donor-derived B220+ cells and CD11b+ cells present in the blood remained stable in the range of 4%–8% until POD 50 and then gradually decreased (Figure 3, B and C). In mice treated with TBI + CoB, stable mixed chimerism of donor-derived CD3+, B220+, and CD11b+ donor cells, accounting for up to 16% of circulating PBMCs, was observed indefinitely (Figure 3, A–C, and Supplemental Figure 2). This indicated that the addition of nonmyeloablative TBI further increased and stabilized the level of chimerism throughout animal survival and correlated with graft survival.
Multilineage PBMC donor chimerism. Donor-specific multilineage mixed chimerism was detected in animals treated with CoB, indicating viable donor hematopoiesis derived from the graft inherent donor BM compartment. The addition of TBI further increased mixed chimerism levels (n = 3–7/time point). (A) Donor-derived CD3+ T cells. (B) Donor-derived B220+ B cells. (C) Donor-derived CD11b+ myeloid cells. The percentage of expression of donor MHC class I for each lineage circulating in host peripheral blood was calculated. Data are representative of at least 3 mice per group from 2–3 independent experiments.
Effect of CoB on T cell reactivity. To assess if the extended survival correlated with a systemic alteration of T lymphocyte alloreactivity, antidonor T cell proliferation was tested using CFSE–mixed lymphocyte reactions (CFSE-MLR). Both CoB- and TBI + CoB–treated groups exhibited significantly reduced CD4+ and CD8+ T cell proliferation against donor-derived DC compared with proliferation of the same cell populations from naive mice. However, the response to third-party DC (Figure 4) was not affected by either treatment, suggesting a donor-specific alteration of alloreactivity.
Mixed lymphocyte reactions to assess T cell alloreactivity. T cells cocultures were performed at various time points after transplantation. (A) Representative dilution of CFSE measured by flow cytometry (B) Decreased CD4+ T cell proliferation against donor-derived DC was observed in the group treated with TBI + CoB compared with the CoB treatment alone. (C) In CD8+ T cells, CoB-treated recipients showed significantly increased proliferation against donor-derived DC at POD 50 and POD 70 compared with mice treated with TBI + CoB. TBI + CoB recipients displayed a decreasing trend of T cell proliferation against donor-derived DC from POD 30 to POD 70. (D and E) CD4+ and CD8+ proliferation was maintained against third-party–derived DC in both treatment groups (n = 3–8/time point and group; mean ± SD, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; P values were calculated by 2-tailed t test).
In addition, allogeneic effector and memory T cell responses were investigated ex vivo. Before treatment and at specific time points after transplant (Figure 5, A and B), lymphocytes were purified and briefly restimulated in vitro to assess the presence of effector/memory function via intracellular staining for IFN-γ. Compared with untreated controls (POD 7), CoB and TBI + CoB treatments inhibited the accumulation of IFN-γ–producing CD4+ T cells (6.04% ± 0.32% vs. 1.53% ± 0.15% and 1.17% ± 0.20%, respectively; P < 0.01) at POD 50 (Figure 5A). By POD 70, increased IFN-γ production was detected in recipients treated with CoB compared with TBI + CoB (percentage of CD4+IFN-γ+ T cells; 4.34% ± 0.58% vs. 1.75% ± 0.37%, respectively; P < 0.05) (Figure 5A). In CD8+ T cells, IFN-γ production was significantly higher in animals treated with TBI + CoB compared with CoB at POD 30 (percentage of CD8+IFN-γ+ T cells; 30.23% ± 2.325% vs. 16.13% ± 2.894%, respectively; P < 0.01) and POD 50 (percentage of CD8+IFN-γ+ T cells; 17.28% ± 2.909% vs. 11.00% ± 2.336%, respectively; P < 0.01) (Figure 5B). In addition, the CoB group showed a significant increase of IFN-γ production between POD 50 and POD 70 (percentage of CD8+IFN-γ+ T cells; 11.00% ± 2.336% vs. 19.58% ± 3.325%, respectively; P < 0.05) that correlated with the pattern seen in CD4+ T cells (Figure 5, A and B). No differences, however, were seen for other intracellular cytokines such as IL-2, IL-10, and IL-17 (Supplemental Figure 3). Collectively, these data indicate that T cell reactivity was suppressed (in an antigen-specific fashion) in VCA recipients treated with CoB. Graft survival inversely correlated with T cell recovery in CoB only–treated animals.
Effect of costimulation blockade on T cell reactivity. (A) Representative gating strategy for the detection of IFN-γ production. The production of IFN-γ in recipient lymphocytes was measured to determine CD4+ T cell reactivity. IFN-γ production was significantly increased in CoB-treated recipients at POD 70 compared with TBI + CoB–treated recipients. NT, nontransplanted control. (B) The production of IFN-γ in recipient lymphocytes was measured to determine CD8+ T cell reactivity. IFN-γ production was significantly increased in CoB-treated recipients at POD 70 compared with POD 50. (C) Graft infiltration by CD4+FoxP3+ T cells was compared across treatment groups and time points in long-term survivors. On POD 30, the proportion of infiltrating CD4+ T cells positive for FoxP3+ was increased in TBI + CoB–treated recipients compared with CoB-treated recipients. CD4+FoxP3+ T cell infiltration increased in the group treated with CoB at POD 50, while remaining unchanged in the group treated with TBI + CoB. At POD 70, the proportion of infiltrating CD4+FoxP3+ T cells decreased compared with POD 50 in TBI + CoB–treated recipients (n = 3–8/time point and group; bar represents mean; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; P values were calculated by 2-tailed t test).
Graft infiltration of FoxP3+ T cells. Tregs play a critical role in maintaining allograft survival in organ transplantation but are not sufficient on their own to induce skin graft tolerance across full MHC barriers in rodent models (18, 19). To further study the critical role of Tregs, we examined the composition of the cellular infiltrate in the VCA after CoB treatment, with particular focus on CD4+ T effector cells and CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs. The proportion of cells expressing Foxp3 was reduced in the untreated control animals compared with nontransplanted naive mouse hind limbs (POD 7, 10.02 ± 1.05 vs. 14.31 ± 0.77, respectively; P < 0.01). At POD 30, fewer infiltrating CD4+Foxp3+ T cells were found in CoB-treated allografts compared with TBI + CoB–treated allografts (11.11 ± 1.74 vs. 40.13 ± 5.31, respectively; P < 0.01). On POD 50, higher numbers of CD4+Foxp3+ T cells were found compared with early time points in both treatment groups and naive and untreated controls (34.39 ± 4.50 in CoB-treated and 38.03 ± 3.56 in TBI + CoB–treated vs. naive and untreated control; P < 0.05). Starting on POD 70, a decline of CD4+ FoxP3+ T cell frequency was observed in animals treated with CoB (29.95 ± 1.70) and TBI + CoB (17.55 ± 3.99). Interestingly, animals in latter group had fewer CD4+FoxP3+ cells compared with CoB-treated recipients (17.55 ± 3.40 vs. 29.95 ± 1.70, respectively; P < 0.05). To study the functionality of Tregs, we assess the suppressive activity of CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs. Tregs isolated from recipients treated with TBI + CoB showed stronger suppression compared with CoB 70 days after transplant. Tregs isolated from the CoB group showed no differences of suppressive activity compared with natural Tregs isolated from WT C57BL/6 mice (Supplemental Figure 4). To further study the origin of these Tregs, donor haplotype expression in the Foxp3+ Tregs was examined in spleen. Frequencies of Tregs expressing donor MHC class I haplotype were significantly higher in the group of TBI + CoB compared with CoB (48.98 ± 15.38 vs. 0.5775 ± 0.337, respectively; P < 0.05), while the proportion of cells expressing Foxp3 in the spleen was similar between both groups on POD70 (9.978 ± 1.638 vs. 11.64 ± 0.8664, respectively; P > 0.05) (Supplemental Figure 5). However, after in vivo depletion of Tregs using PC61, graft survival — as well as induction of mixed chimerism — was not affected (Supplemental Figure 6). The superior suppressive activity of Tregs isolated from animals treated with TBI + CoB suggest an important protective role for Tregs in maintaining allograft survival. However, the differences in the dynamics between CoB and TBI + CoB treatments underscored the importance of central mechanisms of regulation in the establishment of immune tolerance toward a VCA.
TBI + CoB induces robust tolerance to donor antigens via central deletion. To examine the effect of CoB and chimerism on thymic central deletion of donor-reactive T cells, we analyzed the occurrence of certain donor-reactive Vβ T cell receptor (TCR) subunits in PBMCs as previously described by Wekerle et al. (14). Briefly, developing thymocytes whose T cell receptors contain Vβ11 or Vβ5.1/2, which bind to these superantigens, are deleted in I-E+ Balb/C mice — but not in B6 mice because they do not express I-E (20). In mice receiving either CoB or TBI + CoB, reduced frequencies of Vβ5+ and Vβ11+ CD4+ T cells were observed by POD 50, indicating ongoing deletion of donor-reactive T cells. In recipients treated with TBI + CoB, deletion of these alloreactive Vβ5+ and Vβ11+ T cells was sustained throughout the follow-up period (>120 days), while remaining only partial in animals treated with CoB alone (Figure 6). Extended graft survival correlated with higher levels of chimerism and Vβ TCR deletion at a later stage for this group (Figure 6, A and B). This delayed or partial deletion was particularly observed in animals in which chimerism was lost (MST 82 days; compare with Figure 3). Frequencies of control Vβ8 TCR–expressing CD4+ T cells, which do not recognize donor-derived superantigens, were not reduced at any time point, representing normally occurring thymic selection (21) (Figure 6C). To further investigate the role of donor BM in tolerance induction, thymic tissue was collected from long-term–surviving animals. The frequency of CD11c+ DCs expressing donor MHC class I haplotype (H-2Kd) was significantly higher in recipients treated with TBI + CoB compared with CoB alone (15.64 ± 2.647 vs. 2.745 ± 0.9207, respectively; P < 0.01) (Supplemental Figure 7). These results suggest thymic engraftment of donor-derived cells in VCA recipients treated with TBI + CoB, allowing for thymic deletion of donor-reactive T cells.
Central deletion of donor reactive T cells. Vβ TCR markers were used to detect donor-reactive T cells from PBMCs. Deletion of Vβ 5 and 11 TCRs represents central deletion based on thymic engraftment of donor cells as long as chimerism persists (n = 3–7/time point). White and black bars represent expression from naive C57BL/6 and Balb/C controls. (A) Representative gating strategy for detection of Vβ TCR expressions. (B) TBI + CoB–treated animals showed deletion of donor-reactive CD4+Vβ11+ T cells, while CoB-treated recipients showed partial deletion. (C) CD4+Vβ5.1/2+ T cells were deleted in recipients treated with TBI + CoB compared with partial deletion in CoB-treated animals. (D) Positive control Vβ8+ TCR expressing CD4+ T cells were not deleted in either group.
Graft acceptance of secondary skin grafts in long-term survivors. Donor skin graft survival is commonly regarded as a stringent test for assessing transplantation tolerance. We therefore subjected long-term survivors (>POD 120) to a secondary challenge with donor-matched and third-party full-thickness skin grafts (Figure 7A). Long-term survivors treated with TBI + CoB accepted donor-matched skin for the entire 80-day follow-up period, while maintaining the ability to reject third-party skin grafts (Figure 7B). To further test the robustness of the observed tolerance phenomenon, we injected naive, recipient-matched T cells into long-term VCA survivors (Figure 7A) accepting the primary VCA and a secondary skin graft for 210 and 90 days, respectively (the TBI + CoB group). Animals rejected both grafts after 17–22 days (MST 19.33 days) (Figure 7C). These results demonstrate robust donor-specific tolerance in vivo; however, peripheral regulatory mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain insufficient to prevent allograft rejection by naive recipient–type T cells.
Assessment of donor-specific tolerance. (A) Recipients were treated with 250 cGy TBI + CTLA4-Ig + MR1. Long-term survivors were monitored for rejection following subsequent secondary skin grafts and naive T cell injection. (B) Secondary full-thickness skin transplantation was performed in long-term survivors (TBI + CoB–treated, >POD 120) with donor-matched (Balb/C) and third-party (FVB/N) allografts. Long-term survivors accepted second donor–matched skin but rejected third-party–derived skin in MST 14 days (n = 5). (C) Eighty days after secondary skin transplantation, long-term survivors were injected with 20 × 106 naive C57BL/6 T cells. Recipients rejected original hind limb graft and secondary skin graft between 17 and 22 days after injection (n = 3). Statistical differences were calculated by log-rank test.
Current research in VCA focuses on determining significant differences in immunologic features between solid organ transplants and vascularized composite allografts. In particular, a detailed understanding of the alloimmune response toward various graft and tissue types may enable the development of novel strategies for immunomodulation and tolerance induction specifically tailored to VCA to tilt the risk benefit ratio in favor of these non–life saving types of transplants (22). In this study, we aimed to investigate a potentially novel strategy to prevent VCA rejection by using CoB by means of CTLA4-Ig and MR-1 combined with nonmyeloablative induction therapy (Figure 1, B and C).
The application of CoB-based treatment protocols has allowed for significant progress toward critical goals in transplantation, including the need to reduce overall toxicity of high-intensity induction regimens and long-term immunosuppression — in particular, in BMT (23, 24). Furthermore, in addition to its potential application as a primary immunosuppressant allowing minimization or withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitors, rodent models employing CTLA4-Ig suggest that belatacept may have beneficial and critical effects in tolerance-inducing regimens. In a previous study, we showed that CoB-based induction therapy, followed by short-term maintenance with conventional immunosuppression, facilitates vascularized osteomyocutaneous allograft survival in rodents (25). However, CTLA4-Ig alone remains ineffective in prolongation of graft survival and tolerance induction without the addition of either donor splenocyte transfusion (DST) or anti-CD154 antibodies (MR1) (7, 11, 26, 27). There is unequivocal evidence demonstrating that CTLA4-Ig alone is not capable of inducing tolerance in either stringent rodent models (11, 27) or in nonhuman primate solid organ transplantation (28, 29). Even in less-stringent murine heart allograft models, DST or anti-CD40L have to be combined with CTLA4-Ig treatment in order to achieve indefinite graft survival, which is still associated with signs of chronic rejection (30). Thus, it seems clear that CTLA4-Ig must be combined with other strategies if tolerance is the ultimate goal. Though very effective in small and large preclinical animal models, the combination of CTLA4-Ig and anti-CD40L mAb is due the high incidence of thromboembolic events of the latter not yet available in human clinical trials. Thus, administration of donor BM cell infusion/transplantation in combination with CTLA4-Ig appears to be the most promising approach in this regard, as indicated by various small and large animal solid organ transplant models. This is particularly attractive for VCA, as — in many circumstances — the transplanted tissues include a vascularized BM graft component that serves as a BM transplant itself (31, 32). Thus, when combined with donor BM infusion or with grafts containing a vascularized BM component, VCA represent an exciting opportunity to unleash the tolerogenic potential of costimulatory blockade. Previous studies indicated that the combined use of CoB and BM infusion allowed for a reduction of the intensity of the preconditioning regimen, as well as the replacement of irradiation with administration of busulfan, to establish therapeutic mixed chimerism (33). Despite the aforementioned limitations, CD40/CD154 interaction plays a critical role in the regulation of immune responses during allograft rejection; therefore, the development of alternative and clinically applicable regimens remains very attractive. Several candidate agents are currently under investigation, including ICOS, as possible agents that could be used synergistically with CTLA4-Ig (34, 35).
In our current model, CoB alone also did not induce tolerance or sustain any significant level of chimerism and merely prolonged graft survival. Induction of stable donor-specific mixed chimerism and indefinite allograft survival could only be achieved when TBI was added to the regimen and combined with CoB, thus highlighting a critical contribution by TBI (Figure 1D). The result of immunosuppression-free allograft survival represents an incremental advance over data previously published by our group in which allograft survival was merely prolonged and required a short course of conventional immunosuppression (25). Similarly, in clinical BMT, standard conditioning or induction regimens generally include TBI to contribute to the eradication of the underlying disease and facilitate engraftment of donor hematopoieses (36), while promoting T cell apoptosis and resulting in fewer donor-reactive T cells 24 hours after induction (37, 38).
Additionally, however, one may postulate that the vascularized donor BM (DBM) compartment of a VCA, such as the orthotopic hind limb transplant used in this study, plays a critical role in achieving long-term graft survival. As recently reported, the BM niche is a dynamic environment rich in a variety of cells and has shown a significant survival benefit in small and large animal models (25, 32, 39). In line with these findings, our results suggest that this VCA intrinsic feature — a viable BM component — allows for induction of stable multilineage mixed chimerism and long-term graft survival by TBI and CoB-based immunomodulation without the need for short- or long-term conventional maintenance immunosuppression. Based on our finding that donor-derived CD11c+ DCs were significantly more frequent in the thymus of animals tolerized with TBI + CoB (Supplemental Figure 6), our data further indicate that hematopoietic cells migrate from the donor marrow niche and achieve thymic engraftment. Furthermore, our data indicate that this specific treatment of BM-containing VCA and the resulting chimerism are establishing alloantigen-specific tolerance by intrathymic clonal deletion of donor-reactive T cell clones (Figure 6) (14, 24, 33). Despite these findings, the definite role of the vBM niche in tolerance induction and the exact underlying mechanisms need to be further elucidated.
The central roles of the thymus and deletional tolerance mechanisms are well established in chimerism-based immunologic tolerance protocols. However, in addition, peripheral mechanisms dependent on Treg (CD4+Foxp3+ cells) were reported to play a critical role in the immune responses to solid organ transplants (27), as well as VCA (40). In studies of BMT with CoB, thymic-independent early deletion and anergy of alloreactive CD4+ T cells in the peripheral lymphoid organs have been demonstrated, and both activation-induced cell death and passive cell death initially contribute to peripheral CD4+ T effector cell deletion, highlighting a critical phenomenon for tolerance induction (20, 41). Recently, allograft biopsies of human hand transplants 3–6 years after transplantation stained positive for Foxp3 (42). These results further support the relevance of peripheral tolerance phenomena in maintenance of immune quiescence toward VCA. In our study, we found evidence of greater proportions of Tregs in the VCA (Figure 5C) and potent suppressive activities of Tregs (Supplemental Figure 4) that suggest a potential cocontribution of peripheral regulation and central deletional mechanisms (Figure 6 and Supplemental Figure 7) to tolerance maintenance in this murine VCA model. However, peripheral regulation by Tregs alone is not the main mechanism, as in vivo depletion did not affect tolerance induction (Supplemental Figure 6). Finally, in an attempt to determine the robustness of the established immune tolerance, we employed adoptive transfer of naive recipient–matched T cells into animals with a stable immune and graft status beyond POD 120 (Figure 7). The ensuing rejection of primary VCA (including secondary skin grafts) indicates a delicate balance of immune tolerance and alloimmunity within the host. Our data suggest this likely relies primarily on clonal deletion of donor-specific T cell clones during the establishment of mixed chimerism in the underlying treatment protocol. This is supported by findings in similar models of mixed chimerism in which long-term maintenance of donor-specific tolerance relies on intrathymic deletion following weakened peripheral regulatory mechanisms (23, 41, 43). To understand the temporal role of the peripheral Treg response in tolerance induction and maintenance, further studies to assess functionality of infiltrating Tregs and mechanisms of balance between peripheral and central regulation by depleting Tregs will be required.
In conclusion, we were able to demonstrate long-term allograft survival and donor-specific immune tolerance in a fully mismatched murine model of VCA by using a combination of induction treatment with TBI and CoB without the need for conventional maintenance immunosuppression. We were further able to demonstrate a critical role of vBM featuring VCA in induction of donor-specific multilineage mixed chimerism. In our study, the induction of chimerism led to thymic engraftment and central deletion of alloreactive T effector cells and — combined with the presence of an intragraft Treg-dependent milieu — allow for immunosuppression-free allograft survival long-term.
Animals. Male 8- to 10-week-old Balb/C (H-2d), C57BL/6 (B6; H-2b), and FVB/N (H-2q) mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory. Mice were housed in specific pathogen–free facilities at Johns Hopkins University.
Orthotopic hind limb transplantation and full-thickness skin transplantation. Balb/C hind limbs were transplanted into C57BL/6 recipients using a modified version of the technique described by Furtmüller et al. (15). Using the previously described 4-grade rejection scale, we defined Grade 3 (skin epidermolysis) as the endpoint in this study.
Full-thickness trunk skin from Balb/C (donor-matched) or FVB/N (third-party) mice was transplanted onto the lateral thoracic wall of C57BL/6 recipients and secured with 6.0 Ethilon sutures (44). Skin graft survival was monitored daily. Rejection was defined as 70% necrosis of the skin graft.
Treatment protocols. Recipients were irradiated with a single, nonmyeloablative dose of 250 cGy using a Gammacell 40 one day before transplantation. Hamster anti–mouse CD154 mAb (MR1, BioXcell) and –CTLA4-Ig (Orencia [abatacep], Bristol-Myers Squibb) were administered on days 0, 2, 4, and 6 (500 μg/dose i.p.). The combination of anti-CD154 mAb and –CTLA4-Ig is referred to as CoB in this manuscript.
Tissue digestion and leukocytes isolation. Spleen, lymph nodes, thymus, and allografts were collected from transplanted mice at postoperative day (POD) 30, 50, 70, and 120. Cells from grafts were isolated using a modified technique of the methods described by Setoguchi et al. (45). Briefly, tissues were digested at 37°C via 3 consecutive 15-minute incubations in PBS containing Collagenase IV (560U/mL; Worthington) DNAse I (275U/mL; Amresco), and Dispase II (0.4U/mL, Roche). Leukocytes were enriched using a 24% Histodenz-based (Sigma-Aldrich) gradient separation.
Flow cytometry analysis of mixed chimerism and donor-specific antibodies. The presence of donor hematopoiesis in VCA recipients was serially and quantitatively assessed by 4-color flow cytometry–based analysis (FACS Calibur flow cytometer [BD Biosciences] and FlowJo Software [Tree Star Inc.]) of donor-, recipient-, and cell lineage–specific cell surface markers on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). The percentage of donor cells circulating in host peripheral blood was calculated as described previously (46). FITC-conjugated mAbs directed against H-2d (clone SF1-1.1, BioLegend) and H-2b (clone AF6-885, BioLegend), PerCP-Cy5.5–conjugated anti–mouse CD3e (clone 145-2C11, BioLegend), PE-conjugated B220 (clone RA3-6B2, BioLegend), and Alexa Flour 647–conjugated CD11b (clone M1/70, BioLegend) were used.
The formation of donor-specific antibodies in VCA recipients was assessed by flow crossmatch–based analysis as previously described (47). Briefly, recipient serum (1:32 dilution) was incubated with Balb/c splenocytes (1 × 106) after blocking with FBS. APC-conjugated anti-CD3 mAb and FITC-conjugated anti–mouse IgG (BD Biosciences) was added to the samples. The DSA level of each sample was calculated as MFI.
Flow cytometry analysis of TCR Vβ TCR families. Specific PE-conjugated monoclonal antibodies against Vβ5.1/2 (clone MR9-4, BD Biosciences), Vβ11 (clone RR3-15, BD Biosciences), or Vβ8.1/2 (clone F23.1, BD Biosciences) were used to stain peripheral blood lymphocytes at multiple time points for evidence of central deletion of transgenic Vβ TCR repertoires. Additionally, samples were stained with PerCP-Cy5.5–conjugated anti-CD3e, Pacific Blue–conjugated anti-CD4 (clone RM4-5, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and APC-conjugated anti-CD8a (clone 53-6.7, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The percentage of CD3+CD4+ cells expressing each Vβ was determined.
Flow cytometry analysis of intracellular cytokine and transcription factor expression. The following fluorochrome-tagged antibodies were purchased from BD Pharmingen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, and BioLegend: CD4-PB, CD8-FITC, IFN-γ–PE/Cy7 (clone XMG1.2, BD Biosciences), IL-2-PE (clone JES6-5H4, Thermo Fisher Scientific), IL-17–PerCP-Cy5.5 (clone eBo17B7, Thermo Fisher Scientific), IL-10-APC (clone JES5-16E3, Thermo Fisher Scientific), T-bet–PE-Cy7 (clone 4B10, Thermo Fisher Scientific), GATA3-APC (clone L50-823, BD Biosciences), RoR-γt–PE (clone Q31-378, BD Biosciences), and FoxP3–PerCP-Cy5.5 (clone FJK-16s, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Splenocytes and lymph node cells were stimulated in vitro for intracellular cytokines with PMA/ionomycin and protein transport cocktail (Brefeldin/Monensin, eBioscience) for 4.5 hours. Intracellular cytokine staining was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, cells were washed, stained for surface markers, fixed with BD Cytofix/Cytoperm, permeabilized, and incubated with antibodies against intracellular markers for 40 minutes on ice. Flow cytometry–based data acquisition was performed on an LSRII (BD Biosciences), and data were analyzed using FlowJo software.
T cell and BM-derived DC isolations and in vitro MLR. T cell isolation was performed via negative selection of splenocytes and lymphocytes of recipient mice using magnetic bead sorting for in vitro MLR assays and for in vivo testing of peripheral regulatory mechanism via naive donor–type T cell injection (i.e., 20 × 106 C57BL/6 mouse T cells via tail vein). Cells were incubated using purified rat anti–mouse B220, Gr-1, TER-119, I-A/I-E, CD11b, and CD16/32 and anti–rat IgG Dynabeads (Invitrogen), leading to a CD4+ T cell–enriched population following magnetic selection. CFSE (Thermo Fisher Scientific) labeling of T cells was performed according to the manufacture’s protocol.
As stimulator cells in MLR assays, DCs were generated from both donor-matched (Balb/C) and third-party derived (FVB/N) BM after culture for 7 days with IL-4 and GM-CSF in a 37°C incubator (48). Twenty-four hours prior to MLR plating, DCs were activated with 200 ng/mL of LPS. CD11c+ DCs were then isolated using positive magnetic sorting according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Mouse CD11c Positive Selection Kit, Stemcell Technologies). CFSE-labeled T cells and DCs were cultured for 4 days in 37°C, collected, and stained with Fixable Viability Dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Samples were stained for CD4 and CD8, and data were acquired on an LSRII. Data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc.), and results were normalized to the proliferation of naive cells within each individual experiment.
Suppression assay with Tregs. CD4+ T cell isolation was performed via negative selection of splenocytes and lymphocytes of mice using magnetic bead sorting. Cells were incubated using purified rat anti–mouse B220, Gr-1, TER-119, I-A/I-E, CD11b, CD8, and CD16/32 and anti–rat IgG Dynabeads (Invitrogen), leading to a CD4+ T cell–enriched population following magnetic selection. CD25+ selection was followed using magnetic bead sorting (Stemcell Technologies). Overall purity was over 90% in Foxp3+ cell selection. Carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE, Thermo Fisher Scientific) labeling of conventional T cells (CD4+CD25–) was performed according to the manufacture’s protocol. Autologous BM-derived DCs and anti-CD3 antibodies were used for stimulation. CFSE-labeled conventional T cells, DCs, and anti-CD3 in the presence or absence of various ratios of Treg were cultured for 3 days in 37°C, collected, and stained with Fixable Viability Dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Samples were stained for CD4, and data were acquired on an LSRII. Data were analyzed using FlowJo software.
Histological analysis. Fresh tissue was fixed in 10% formalin for at least 24 hours and subsequently processed and embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections (5 μm–thick) were cut on a microtome and stained with H&E. Histological specimens were reviewed by a mouse pathologist blinded to the treatment regimens.
Statistics. Allograft survival was calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier product limit method and compared between groups using a log-rank test. Statistical analysis of in vitro data pertaining to donor-specific chimerism, cell proliferation, and the frequency of T cells, transcription factors ILs was determined with a 2-tailed Student’s t test for comparison of means with unequal variances. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Study approval. All experiments were approved by the IACUC of Johns Hopkins University (IACUC no. M019M352) and conducted according to NIH guidelines.
BCO, GJF, MLF, YG, FM, and JK performed surgical procedures, conducted in vitro experiments, cared for experimental animals, interpreted data, and prepared manuscript. SS, DSC, WPAL, and GR interpreted data and prepared the manuscript. GB designed experiments, interpreted data, and prepared manuscript.
The authors thank Richa Kalsi (Department of Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA) for her help with the graphic abstract for this manuscript. We would like to acknowledge internal support from the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Address correspondence to: Gerald Brandacher, Ross Research Building/Room 749D, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. Phone: 1.443.287.6679; Email: brandacher@jhmi.edu.
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Copyright: © 2020, American Society for Clinical Investigation.
Reference information: JCI Insight. 2020;5(7):e128560.https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.128560.