Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Share this article
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article
Advertisement

Research ArticleImmunologyInflammation Open Access | 10.1172/jci.insight.130771

CC16 augmentation reduces exaggerated COPD-like disease in Cc16-deficient mice

Joselyn Rojas-Quintero,1,2 Maria Eugenia Laucho-Contreras,2,3 Xiaoyun Wang,2,4 Quynh-Anh Fucci,2 Patrick R. Burkett,2 Se-Jin Kim,2 Duo Zhang,4,5 Yohannes Tesfaigzi,2 Yuhong Li,2 Abhiram R. Bhashyam,6 Zhang Li,2 Haider Khamas,2 Bartolome Celli,2 Aprile L. Pilon,7 Francesca Polverino,1,2 and Caroline A. Owen2

1Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

3Fundación Neumológica Colombiana, Bogotá, Colombia.

4Clinical and Experimental Therapeutics program, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia and Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center, Augusta, Georgia, USA.

5Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

6Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

7APCBio Innovations, Inc., Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Caroline Owen, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, 3016H, Hale Building, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Email: cowenusa@yahoo.com.

Find articles by Rojas-Quintero, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

3Fundación Neumológica Colombiana, Bogotá, Colombia.

4Clinical and Experimental Therapeutics program, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia and Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center, Augusta, Georgia, USA.

5Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

6Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

7APCBio Innovations, Inc., Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Caroline Owen, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, 3016H, Hale Building, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Email: cowenusa@yahoo.com.

Find articles by Laucho-Contreras, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

3Fundación Neumológica Colombiana, Bogotá, Colombia.

4Clinical and Experimental Therapeutics program, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia and Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center, Augusta, Georgia, USA.

5Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

6Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

7APCBio Innovations, Inc., Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Caroline Owen, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, 3016H, Hale Building, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Email: cowenusa@yahoo.com.

Find articles by Wang, X. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

3Fundación Neumológica Colombiana, Bogotá, Colombia.

4Clinical and Experimental Therapeutics program, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia and Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center, Augusta, Georgia, USA.

5Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

6Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

7APCBio Innovations, Inc., Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Caroline Owen, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, 3016H, Hale Building, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Email: cowenusa@yahoo.com.

Find articles by Fucci, Q. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

3Fundación Neumológica Colombiana, Bogotá, Colombia.

4Clinical and Experimental Therapeutics program, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia and Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center, Augusta, Georgia, USA.

5Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

6Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

7APCBio Innovations, Inc., Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Caroline Owen, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, 3016H, Hale Building, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Email: cowenusa@yahoo.com.

Find articles by Burkett, P. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

3Fundación Neumológica Colombiana, Bogotá, Colombia.

4Clinical and Experimental Therapeutics program, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia and Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center, Augusta, Georgia, USA.

5Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

6Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

7APCBio Innovations, Inc., Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Caroline Owen, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, 3016H, Hale Building, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Email: cowenusa@yahoo.com.

Find articles by Kim, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

3Fundación Neumológica Colombiana, Bogotá, Colombia.

4Clinical and Experimental Therapeutics program, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia and Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center, Augusta, Georgia, USA.

5Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

6Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

7APCBio Innovations, Inc., Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Caroline Owen, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, 3016H, Hale Building, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Email: cowenusa@yahoo.com.

Find articles by Zhang, D. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

3Fundación Neumológica Colombiana, Bogotá, Colombia.

4Clinical and Experimental Therapeutics program, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia and Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center, Augusta, Georgia, USA.

5Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

6Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

7APCBio Innovations, Inc., Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Caroline Owen, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, 3016H, Hale Building, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Email: cowenusa@yahoo.com.

Find articles by Tesfaigzi, Y. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

3Fundación Neumológica Colombiana, Bogotá, Colombia.

4Clinical and Experimental Therapeutics program, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia and Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center, Augusta, Georgia, USA.

5Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

6Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

7APCBio Innovations, Inc., Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Caroline Owen, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, 3016H, Hale Building, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Email: cowenusa@yahoo.com.

Find articles by Li, Y. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

3Fundación Neumológica Colombiana, Bogotá, Colombia.

4Clinical and Experimental Therapeutics program, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia and Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center, Augusta, Georgia, USA.

5Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

6Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

7APCBio Innovations, Inc., Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Caroline Owen, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, 3016H, Hale Building, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Email: cowenusa@yahoo.com.

Find articles by Bhashyam, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

3Fundación Neumológica Colombiana, Bogotá, Colombia.

4Clinical and Experimental Therapeutics program, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia and Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center, Augusta, Georgia, USA.

5Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

6Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

7APCBio Innovations, Inc., Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Caroline Owen, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, 3016H, Hale Building, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Email: cowenusa@yahoo.com.

Find articles by Li, Z. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

3Fundación Neumológica Colombiana, Bogotá, Colombia.

4Clinical and Experimental Therapeutics program, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia and Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center, Augusta, Georgia, USA.

5Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

6Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

7APCBio Innovations, Inc., Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Caroline Owen, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, 3016H, Hale Building, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Email: cowenusa@yahoo.com.

Find articles by Khamas, H. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

3Fundación Neumológica Colombiana, Bogotá, Colombia.

4Clinical and Experimental Therapeutics program, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia and Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center, Augusta, Georgia, USA.

5Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

6Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

7APCBio Innovations, Inc., Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Caroline Owen, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, 3016H, Hale Building, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Email: cowenusa@yahoo.com.

Find articles by Celli, B. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

3Fundación Neumológica Colombiana, Bogotá, Colombia.

4Clinical and Experimental Therapeutics program, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia and Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center, Augusta, Georgia, USA.

5Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

6Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

7APCBio Innovations, Inc., Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Caroline Owen, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, 3016H, Hale Building, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Email: cowenusa@yahoo.com.

Find articles by Pilon, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

3Fundación Neumológica Colombiana, Bogotá, Colombia.

4Clinical and Experimental Therapeutics program, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia and Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center, Augusta, Georgia, USA.

5Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

6Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

7APCBio Innovations, Inc., Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Caroline Owen, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, 3016H, Hale Building, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Email: cowenusa@yahoo.com.

Find articles by Polverino, F. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

3Fundación Neumológica Colombiana, Bogotá, Colombia.

4Clinical and Experimental Therapeutics program, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia and Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center, Augusta, Georgia, USA.

5Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

6Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

7APCBio Innovations, Inc., Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Address correspondence to: Caroline Owen, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, 3016H, Hale Building, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Email: cowenusa@yahoo.com.

Find articles by Owen, C. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |

Published February 14, 2023 - More info

Published in Volume 8, Issue 6 on March 22, 2023
JCI Insight. 2023;8(6):e130771. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.130771.
© 2023 Rojas-Quintero et al. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Published February 14, 2023 - Version history
Received: June 17, 2019; Accepted: February 10, 2023
View PDF
Abstract

Low Club Cell 16 kDa protein (CC16) plasma levels are linked to accelerated lung function decline in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Cigarette smoke–exposed (CS-exposed) Cc16–/– mice have exaggerated COPD-like disease associated with increased NF-κB activation in their lungs. It is unclear whether CC16 augmentation can reverse exaggerated COPD in CS-exposed Cc16–/– mice and whether increased NF-κB activation contributes to the exaggerated COPD in CS-exposed Cc16–/– lungs. CS-exposed WT and Cc16–/– mice were treated with recombinant human CC16 (rhCC16) or an NF-κB inhibitor versus vehicle beginning at the midpoint of the exposures. COPD-like disease and NF-κB activation were measured in the lungs. RhCC16 limited the progression of emphysema, small airway fibrosis, and chronic bronchitis-like disease in WT and Cc16–/– mice partly by reducing pulmonary inflammation (reducing myeloid leukocytes and/or increasing regulatory T and/or B cells) and alveolar septal cell apoptosis, reducing NF-κB activation in CS-exposed Cc16–/– lungs, and rescuing the reduced Foxj1 expression in CS-exposed Cc16–/– lungs. IMD0354 treatment reduced exaggerated lung inflammation and rescued the reduced Foxj1 expression in CS-exposed Cc16–/– mice. RhCC16 treatment reduced NF-κB activation in luciferase reporter A549 cells. Thus, rhCC16 treatment limits COPD progression in CS-exposed Cc16–/– mice partly by inhibiting NF-κB activation and represents a potentially novel therapeutic approach for COPD.

Graphical Abstract
graphical abstract
Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive, debilitating disease characterized by airflow obstruction that is poorly reversible. Currently, there is a lack of medical therapies that significantly alter the course of COPD (1). From 1990 to 2015, the prevalence of COPD increased by 44.2%, and in 2015, it affected approximately 175 million people and was responsible for 3.2 million deaths worldwide (2). Cigarette smoke (CS), the strongest risk factor for COPD in industrialized countries (1–3), induces chronic lung inflammation, oxidative stress, alveolar septal cell apoptosis, and aberrant repair processes (4). COPD patients can develop different pulmonary pathologies including emphysema, small airway fibrosis (SAF), and mucus hypersecretion that vary in severity from patient to patient (3).

Club cell 16 kDa protein (CC16) is a highly conserved, circulating 16 kDa homodimeric protein. The main cellular source of CC16 is airway club cells, which secrete CC16 into the epithelial airway surface liquid from where it diffuses into the circulation (5). Cc16–/– mice have increased pulmonary inflammation and lung injury in models of inflamm-aging (5), eosinophilic inflammation (6), and viral infection associated with macrophage-driven pulmonary inflammation (7). CC16’s pleiotropic activities are probably due to its binding to various receptors (8).

In large observational cohort studies serum CC16 protein levels are lower in patients with COPD than smokers and nonsmokers (9). Low CC16 plasma levels are linked to COPD progression (10–12) and the chronic bronchitis (CB) phenotype (12). CC16 is one of the most highly hypermethylated genes in small airway epithelial cells in smokers (13), suggesting that reduced airway CC16 expression in smokers and COPD patients is mediated, in part, by epigenetic silencing. Airway CC16 staining is also reduced in CS-exposed mice and nonhuman primates (11, 12). CS-exposed Cc16–/– mice develop greater lung inflammation, airspace enlargement, mucus metaplasia, and SAF than CS-exposed wild-type (WT) mice (11, 12), and these changes are associated with increased NF-κB activation in the lungs (5, 12). However, whether the increased NF-κB activation detected in the lungs of CS-exposed Cc16–/– mice directly contributes to their exuberant lung inflammatory response to CS and exaggerated COPD development is unclear.

It has been hypothesized that augmenting CC16 lung levels represents a therapeutic approach for COPD (8). Consistent with this notion, adenovirus-mediated overexpression of Cc16 in the lungs of WT and Cc16–/– mice protected them from developing CS-induced lung inflammation and airway mucus cell metaplasia (11). Building upon these findings, we tested 2 hypotheses: first, delivering recombinant human CC16 (rhCC16) protein to the lung limits the progression of CS-induced COPD-like parenchymal and airway disease in CS-exposed WT and Cc16–/– mice, and second, delivering a small molecule NF-κB inhibitor to Cc16–/– mice reduces their exuberant pulmonary inflammatory response to CS, thereby mechanistically linking the increased NF-κB activation observed in their lungs to their pulmonary phenotype when exposed to CS.

Results

COPD-like pulmonary pathologies. To evaluate the effects of rhCC16 on COPD-like lung disease in mice, WT and Cc16–/– mice were exposed to CS or room air for 24 weeks to induce emphysema and SAF (14) (Figure 1A). CS-exposed mice were treated thrice weekly with rhCC16 or vehicle delivered by the intranasal (i.n.) route beginning at the midpoint of the CS exposures. CS-exposed and vehicle-treated Cc16–/– mice had greater emphysema (Figure 2, A and B) and SAF (Figure 2, C and D) than CS-exposed and vehicle-treated WT mice, as expected (10). Treating CS-exposed WT and Cc16–/– mice with rhCC16 abrogated both emphysema and SAF in both genotypes. Healthy male mice have lower circulating Cc16 levels due to higher glomerular filtration rates (15). There were no significant differences in emphysema or SAF according to sex (Supplemental Table 1; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.130771DS1) or in respiratory mechanics between CS-exposed and rhCC16-treated and CS-exposed and vehicle-treated WT or Cc16–/– mice (Supplemental Table 2).

CS exposure and treatment protocols.Figure 1

CS exposure and treatment protocols. In A, WT and Cc16–/– mice were exposed to air or CS for a total of 24 weeks, receiving rhCC16 protein weeks 12–24. In B, WT and Cc16–/– mice were exposed to air or CS for a total of 5 weeks, receiving rhCC16 protein from week 3 through week 5. In C, WT and Cc16–/– mice were exposed to air or CS for a total of 8 weeks, receiving rhCC16 protein from week 4 through week 8. In D, WT and Cc16–/– mice were exposed to air or CS for a total of 12 weeks, receiving NF-κB inhibitor from week 6 through week 12. The readouts measured for each exposure are indicated. Foxj1, Forkhead box-J1.

Treating WT and Cc16–/– mice exposed to CS for 24 weeks with rhCC16 limitsFigure 2

Treating WT and Cc16–/– mice exposed to CS for 24 weeks with rhCC16 limits the progression of COPD-like disease. WT and Cc16–/– mice were exposed to air (5–6 mice/group) or CS for 24 weeks (12–13 mice/group), and rhCC16 (75 μg of rhCC16; 6–7 mice/group) or vehicle (6 mice/group) was delivered thrice weekly by the i.n. route to CS-exposed mice for the last 12 weeks of the CS exposures. Sections of inflated and fixed lungs were stained with either Gill’s stain (A) and alveolar chord lengths as a measure of airspace size were quantified (B) or with Masson’s trichrome stain (C, which stains extracellular matrix [ECM] proteins blue) and the thickness of the layer of ECM deposited around the small airways was quantified (D). In B and D, boxes in the box plots show the medians and 25th and 75th percentiles, and whiskers show the 10th and 90th percentiles. Data were analyzed using 1-way ANOVAs followed by pairwise testing with Mann-Whitney U tests. Asterisks indicate P < 0.05 vs. air-exposed mice belonging to the same genotype or the group indicated.

Impaired mucociliary clearance (MCC) and mucus hypersecretion contribute to the CB COPD phenotype. Exposing WT mice to CS for 3 weeks is sufficient to almost completely inhibit MCC (16). However, to our knowledge, MCC has not been evaluated previously in air-exposed Cc16–/– mice or CS-exposed WT versus Cc16–/– mice. WT and Cc16–/– mice were exposed to air or CS for 3 weeks, and MCC was measured by delivering 99mtechnetium-sulfur colloid (99mTc-sc) to the lungs and measuring its clearance using 3D μ-SPECT imaging (Figure 1B). Exposing WT mice to CS for 3 weeks severely impaired MCC (Figure 3A) (16). Cc16–/– mice had impaired MCC even at baseline, and exposing them to CS for 3 weeks further impaired MCC (Figure 3A). WT and Cc16–/– mice were exposed to CS for 3 weeks and treated with rhCC16 or vehicle for an additional 2 weeks of CS exposure (Figure 1B). Treating CS-exposed WT and Cc16–/– mice with rhCC16 restored MCC in both genotypes (Figure 3A).

Treatment with rhCC16 limits the progression of CB-like disease in WT and CFigure 3

Treatment with rhCC16 limits the progression of CB-like disease in WT and Cc16–/– mice exposed for CS for up to 8 weeks. In A, WT and Cc16–/– mice were exposed to air (5–8 mice/group) or CS (4 mice/group) for 3 weeks, which is sufficient to impair mucociliary clearance (MCC) in WT mice (16). Other cohorts of mice were exposed to CS for 3 weeks, and then thrice weekly treatment with rhCC16 (75 μg of rhCC16; 4–5 mice/group) or vehicle (3–8 mice/group) delivered by the i.n. route was initiated and continued during an additional 2 weeks of CS exposure. 99mTc-sc was instilled into the lungs of anesthetized mice, and the efficiency of 99mTc-sc clearance from lungs was measured using noninvasive, 3-dimensional μ-SPECT imaging. In B–D, WT and Cc16–/– mice were exposed to air (7 mice/group) or CS for 8 weeks (15–17 mice/group). CS-exposed mice were treated thrice weekly with rhCC16 (8 mice/group) or vehicle (7–9 mice/group) for the last 4 weeks of the 8-week CS exposures. The expression of Foxj1 (B), mucin 5ac (Muc5ac; C), and Muc5b (D) was measured in whole lung samples using reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR). In A–D, boxes in the box plots show the medians and 25th and 75th percentiles, and the whiskers show the 10th and 90th percentiles. Data were analyzed using 1-way ANOVAs followed by pairwise testing with Mann-Whitney U tests. Asterisks indicate P < 0.05 vs. air-exposed mice belonging to the same genotype or the group indicated.

Effective MCC requires motile cilia on airway epithelial cells, and Foxj1 is a transcription factor required for the expression of genes involved in ciliary motility (17, 18). To determine the effect of CS exposure and rhCC16 treatment on Foxj1 expression, mice were exposed to CS for 8 weeks, and thrice weekly rhCC16 or vehicle treatment was initiated at the midpoint of these exposures and continued for the second 4 weeks (Figure 1C). CS-exposed and vehicle-treated WT (but not Cc16–/–) mice had increased Foxj1 expression in their lungs compared with the air-exposed corresponding controls (Figure 3B). RhCC16 treatment increased Foxj1 expression in CS-exposed Cc16–/– mice versus vehicle-treated Cc16–/– mice but did not increase Foxj1 expression further in CS-exposed WT mice.

To evaluate the effects of rhCC16 treatment on airway mucus metaplasia, WT and Cc16–/– mice were exposed to CS for 4 weeks to induce airway mucus metaplasia (19), followed by thrice weekly treatment with rhCC16 or vehicle for an additional 4 weeks of CS exposure (Figure 1C). CS-exposed and vehicle-treated Cc16–/– mice had greater increases in mucin 5ac (Muc5ac) and Muc5b gene expression levels in their lungs than CS-exposed and vehicle-treated WT mice (Figure 3, C and D). RhCC16 treatment abrogated CS-induced increases in Muc5ac and Muc5b gene expression levels in CS-exposed WT and Cc16–/– mice. Muc1 expression levels were similar across experimental groups (Supplemental Figure 1). WT and Cc16–/– mice were then exposed chronically to CS for 24 weeks and treated with rhCC16 solution or vehicle for the second 12 weeks of the 24-week CS exposure (Figure 1A). Muc5ac staining was robustly increased in CS-exposed and vehicle-treated Cc16–/– and WT mice versus air-exposed mice belonging to the same genotype. Muc5ac staining was significantly lower in rhCC16-treated versus vehicle-treated CS-exposed Cc16–/– mice (Figure 4, A and B).

Treatment of mice with rhCC16 limits the development of mucus cell metaplasFigure 4

Treatment of mice with rhCC16 limits the development of mucus cell metaplasia and rescues Foxj1 expression in mice exposed chronically to CS. WT and Cc16–/– mice were exposed to air (3–5 mice/group) or CS for 24 weeks (10–13 mice/group), and rhCC16 (75 μg of rhCC16; 5–7 mice/group) or vehicle (5–6 mice/group) was delivered thrice weekly by the i.n. route to CS-exposed mice for the last 12 weeks of the CS exposures. Lung sections were immunostained for Muc5ac (A and B) and Foxj1 (C and D), and the percentage of positively stained airway epithelial cells was determined. Arrows point to Muc5ac-positive cells. The box plots show the medians and 25th and 75th percentiles, and whiskers show the 10th and 90th percentiles. Data were analyzed using 1-way ANOVAs followed by pairwise testing with Mann-Whitney U tests. Asterisks indicate P < 0.05 vs. air-exposed mice belonging to the same genotype or the group indicated. FI, fluorescence Intensity; px, pixel.

As rhCC16 treatment rescued the reduced Foxj1 expression in acute CS exposures, we quantified Foxj1 positively stained cells in the 24-week CS exposure model (Figure 1A). Air-exposed Cc16–/– mice had lower numbers of Foxj1 positively stained airway epithelial cells than air-exposed WT mice. CS-exposed and vehicle-treated WT and Cc16–/– mice had a lower number of Foxj1 positively stained cells than air-exposed mice belonging to the same genotype. CS-exposed and vehicle-treated Cc16–/– mice had lower numbers of Foxj1 positively stained cells than CS-exposed and vehicle-treated WT mice. RhCC16 treatment increased the number of Foxj1 positively stained airway epithelial cells in both WT and Cc16–/– mice (Figure 4, C and D).

CS exposure impairs weight gain in WT mice (14). Air-exposed WT and Cc16–/– mice showed progressive increases in body weight over 24 weeks (Supplemental Figure 2A). CS-exposed and vehicle-treated WT mice (Figure 1A) had reduced weight gain during weeks 12–24 versus air-exposed WT mice; CS-exposed and rhCC16-treated WT mice had similar weight gain as the air-exposed controls (Supplemental Figure 2A). CS-exposed and vehicle-treated Cc16–/– mice had similar weight gain as air-exposed controls (Supplemental Figure 2B). CS-exposed and rhCC16-treated Cc16–/– mice had greater increases in body weight from the 18th week of CS exposure onward compared with air-exposed and also CS-exposed and vehicle-treated Cc16–/– mice (Supplemental Figure 2B).

Mechanistic studies. CC16 has potent antiinflammatory activities in the CS-exposed lung (5, 8, 10). Pulmonary inflammation contributes to emphysema development, SAF, and airway mucus hypersecretion (4). We investigated the effects of rhCC16 on CS-induced acute and chronic pulmonary inflammation, alveolar septal cell apoptosis, and impaired septal cell proliferation, which also contribute to emphysema development (10, 19).

Lung inflammation. WT and Cc16–/– mice were exposed to CS for 4 weeks to induce acute pulmonary inflammation (10). Treatment with rhCC16 versus vehicle was then initiated in CS-exposed mice via the i.n. route and continued thrice weekly for an additional 4 weeks of CS exposure, and then pulmonary inflammation was quantified (Figure 1C). CS induced greater increases in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) total leukocyte and macrophage counts in Cc16–/– versus WT mice (Figure 5, A and B). RhCC16 treatment abrogated CS-induced increases in BAL total leukocyte and macrophage counts in both genotypes (Figure 5, A and B). CS exposure modestly increased BAL polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) counts in WT (but not Cc16–/– mice); rhCC16 treatment had no effect on BAL PMN counts in CS-exposed WT mice (Figure 5C). CS-exposed WT mice had higher BAL lymphocyte counts than air-exposed WT mice. RhCC16-treated and CS-exposed Cc16–/– mice (but not WT mice) had a striking increase in BAL lymphocyte counts versus CS-exposed and vehicle-treated control mice (Figure 5D).

Treating CS-exposed WT and Cc16–/– mice with rhCC16 abrogates acute pulmonaFigure 5

Treating CS-exposed WT and Cc16–/– mice with rhCC16 abrogates acute pulmonary inflammation. WT and Cc16–/– mice were exposed to air (4–5 mice/group) or CS for 8 weeks (8 mice/group). CS-exposed mice were treated thrice weekly with rhCC16 (75 μg of rhCC16; 4 mice/group) or vehicle (4 mice/group) for the last 4 weeks of the exposures, and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed. BAL total leukocytes (A), macrophages (B), PMNs (C), and lymphocytes (D) were counted. Boxes in the box plots show the median values and 25th and 75th percentiles, and whiskers show the 10th and 90th percentiles. Data were analyzed using 1-way ANOVAs followed by pairwise testing with Mann-Whitney U tests. Asterisks indicate P < 0.05 vs. air-exposed mice belonging to the same genotype or the group indicated.

WT and Cc16–/– mice were exposed to CS for 12 weeks to induce chronic pulmonary inflammation (10). Treatment with rhCC16 or vehicle was then initiated in the CS-exposed mice via the i.n. route and continued thrice weekly during an additional 12 weeks of CS exposure, and pulmonary inflammation was quantified (Figure 1A). CS-exposed and vehicle-treated Cc16–/– mice had greater increases in BAL total leukocyte and leukocyte subset counts than CS-exposed and vehicle-treated WT mice compared with the air-exposed controls (Figure 6, A–D). Treating Cc16–/– mice (but not WT mice) with rhCC16 substantially abrogated the CS-induced increases in BAL total leukocyte, macrophage, PMN, and lymphocyte counts versus vehicle-treated control mice (Figure 6, A–D). CS-exposed and vehicle-treated WT and CC16–/– mice had increased BAL total leukocyte and leukocyte subset counts in both sexes in both genotypes, and rhCC16 treatment reduced CS-induced increases in BAL total leukocyte and leukocyte subset counts in both sexes in both genotypes (Supplemental Table 3).

Treating CS-exposed Cc16–/– mice with rhCC16 reduces chronic pulmonary inflFigure 6

Treating CS-exposed Cc16–/– mice with rhCC16 reduces chronic pulmonary inflammation. WT and Cc16–/– mice were exposed to air (7–8 mice/group) or CS for 24 weeks (20–25 mice/group). CS-exposed mice were treated with rhCC16 (75 μg of rhCC16; 10–15 mice/group) or vehicle (10–13 mice/group) thrice weekly for the last 12 weeks of the exposures and BAL was performed. BAL total leukocytes (A), macrophages (B), PMNs (C), and lymphocytes (D) were counted. Boxes in the box plots show the median values and 25th and 75th percentiles, and whiskers show the 10th and 90th percentiles. Data were analyzed using 1-way ANOVAs followed by pairwise testing with Mann-Whitney U tests. Asterisks indicate P < 0.05 vs. air-exposed mice belonging to the same genotype or the group indicated.

CS-exposed and vehicle-treated Cc16–/– (but not WT) mice had increased expression of Il-6 and Tnf-α in their lungs (Figure 7, A and B). RhCC16 treatment reduced the expression of Il-6 (but not Tnf-α) in the lungs of CS-exposed Cc16–/– mice. CS-exposed and vehicle-treated WT (but not Cc16–/–) mice had increased expression of antiinflammatory Il-10 in their lungs. RhCC16 treatment increased Il-10 expression in the lungs of CS-exposed Cc16–/– (but not WT) mice versus that in CS-exposed and vehicle-treated control mice (Figure 7C). CS-exposed and vehicle-treated WT (but not Cc16–/–) mice had reduced Tgf-β expression in their lungs, but rhCC16 treatment had no effect on Tgf-β expression in the lungs of CS-exposed mice (Supplemental Figure 3A). CS-exposed and vehicle-treated Cc16–/– (but not WT) mice had increased expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (Mmp-9), and CS-exposed and vehicle-treated WT and Cc16–/– mice had increased expression of Mmp-12 in their lungs versus air-exposed controls. RhCC16 treatment to CS-exposed Cc16–/– (but not WT) mice reduced Mmp-9 and Mmp-12 gene expression in their lungs versus CS-exposed and vehicle-treated mice (Figure 7, D and E). CS-exposed and vehicle-treated WT mice had increased expression of Ccl-2 in their lungs, and CS-exposed and vehicle-treated WT and Cc16–/– had increased expression of Ccl-3 and Ccl-5 in their lungs versus air-exposed control mice. However, rhCC16 treatment did not alter the expression of any of these chemokines in the lungs of CS-exposed mice (Supplemental Figure 3, B–D).

Treating CS-exposed Cc16–/– mice with rhCC16 reduces the expression of someFigure 7

Treating CS-exposed Cc16–/– mice with rhCC16 reduces the expression of some mediators of inflammation and injury in their lungs. WT and Cc16–/– mice were exposed to air (7 mice/group) or CS for 8 weeks (15–17 mice/group). CS-exposed mice were treated thrice weekly with rhCC16 (8 mice/group) or vehicle (7–9 mice/group) for the last 4 weeks of the 8-week CS exposures. The expression of Il-6 (A), Tnf-α (B), Il-10 (C), Mmp-9 (D), and Mmp-12 (E) was measured in whole lung samples using RT-qPCR. Boxes in the box plots show the medians and 25th and 75th percentiles, and whiskers show the 10th and 90th percentiles. Data were analyzed using 1-way ANOVAs followed by pairwise testing with Mann-Whitney U tests. Asterisks indicate P < 0.05 vs. air-exposed mice belonging to the same genotype or the group indicated.

Lymphocyte subsets. As rhCC16 treatment increased lymphocyte counts and Il-10 expression in the lungs of CS-exposed Cc16–/– mice (Figure 5D and Figure 7C), the relative frequencies of lung lymphocyte subsets were quantified including those that produce IL-10. WT and Cc16–/– mice were exposed to air or CS for 8 weeks, and CS-exposed mice were treated with rhCC16 or vehicle for the last 4 weeks of the exposures. Enzymatic lung digests were immunostained for markers of lymphocyte subsets (20) and markers of activation, including programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) (21), T cell Ig domain and mucin domain protein-3 (Tim-3) (22), T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT) (23), and suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (ST2) (24).

The frequencies of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were increased in the lungs of air-exposed Cc16–/– versus WT mice (Table 1). CS-exposed and vehicle-treated WT (but not Cc16–/–) mice had an increased frequency of lung-infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. RhCC16 treatment did not alter CD4+ or CD8+ T cell frequencies in either CS-exposed WT or Cc16–/– mice versus CS-exposed and vehicle-treated controls. CS-exposed and vehicle-treated WT and Cc16–/– mice did not differ in their frequencies of lung-resident type 2 ILCs (ST2+Thy1+CD4– cells), NK cells, or CD19+ B cells, and rhCC16 treatment did not alter the frequency of these cells in CS-exposed lungs of either genotype (Table 1).

Table 1

Lymphocyte subset counts

CS-exposed and vehicle-treated Cc16–/– (but not WT) mice had an increased frequency of PD-1+CD4+ T cells versus air-exposed controls, but there were no differences in PD-1 expression on CD8+ T cells or B cells between genotypes (Supplemental Figure 4, A–C). CS-exposed and vehicle-treated Cc16–/– (but not WT) mice had increased lung Tim-3+CD4+ and Tim-3+CD8+ T lymphocyte counts versus air-exposed control mice (Supplemental Figure 4, D and E). Cc16–/– mice had greater lung Tim-3+ NK cell counts than WT mice when exposed to air or CS (Supplemental Figure 4F). RhCC16 treatment increased lung PD-1+CD8+ T cell counts only in CS-exposed Cc16–/– mice versus air-exposed controls but had no effect on lung PD-1+CD4+ T cell, Tim-3+CD4+ T cell, Tim-3+CD8+ T cell, or Tim-3+ NK cell counts. Overall, rhCC16 treatment does not exert its protective effects on the CS-exposed lung by promoting the expression of inhibitory cell surface receptors on T or B lymphocytes.

CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) release IL-10 and negatively regulate effector T cell activity. CS-exposed and vehicle-treated Cc16–/– (but not WT) mice had an increased frequency of lung-resident Tregs versus air-exposed controls (Figure 8A). RhCC16 treatment increased Treg frequency to a greater extent in CS-exposed Cc16–/– versus WT lungs. IL-33–expanded Tregs express ST2 (IL-33 receptor) and ST2+ Tregs are key suppressors of detrimental Th1 and Th2 immune responses (25). CS-exposed and vehicle-treated Cc16–/– (but not WT) mice had an increased ST2+ Treg frequency in their lungs versus air-exposed control mice. RhCC16 treatment did not alter lung ST2+ Treg frequencies in CS-exposed WT or Cc16–/– mice versus CS-exposed and vehicle-treated control mice belonging to the same genotype (Supplemental Figure 4G). TIGIT+ Tregs suppress Th1 and Th17 lymphocyte responses (24, 25). CS-exposed and vehicle-treated WT (but not Cc16–/–) mice had a reduced frequency of lung TIGIT+ Tregs versus air-exposed mice. CS-exposed and vehicle-treated Cc16–/– mice had a higher frequency of lung TIGIT+ Tregs than CS-exposed and vehicle-treated WT mice (Figure 8B). RhCC16 treatment increased the frequency of lung TIGIT+ Tregs to a greater extent in CS-exposed Cc16–/– versus WT mice.

Treating CS-exposed WT and/or Cc16–/– mice with rhCC16 increases T cell regFigure 8

Treating CS-exposed WT and/or Cc16–/– mice with rhCC16 increases T cell regulatory and/or B regulatory subset counts in their lungs. WT and Cc16–/– mice were exposed to air (5 mice/group) or CS for 8 weeks (14–15 mice/group), and CS-exposed mice were treated with rhCC16 (75 μg of rhCC16; 7 mice/group) or vehicle (7–8 mice-group) thrice weekly for the last 4 weeks of the exposures. Lymphocyte subsets were quantified in enzymatic lung digests using flow cytometry after immunostaining the cells for: CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs (gating on CD4+ lymphocytes) in A, TIGIT+ Tregs (gating on CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ lymphocytes) in B, and Tim-1+ Bregs (gating on CD19+ cells) in C. The horizontal bars in the dot plots represent the mean values. Data were analyzed using 1-way ANOVAs followed by pairwise testing with Mann-Whitney U tests. Asterisks indicate P < 0.05 vs. air-exposed mice belonging to the same genotype or the group indicated.

Regulatory B cells (Bregs) (Tim-1+ B cells; ref. 26) also secrete IL-10 and negatively regulate T effector cells. Breg frequencies were higher in air-exposed Cc16–/– versus WT lungs (Figure 8C). CS-exposed and vehicle-treated WT and Cc16–/– mice had increases in lung Breg frequencies compared with those in air-exposed mice belonging to the same genotype. CS-exposed and vehicle-treated Cc16–/– mice had increased lung Breg frequencies versus CS-exposed and vehicle-treated WT mice. RhCC16 treatment increased lung Breg frequency only in CS-exposed WT mice versus CS-exposed and vehicle-treated controls (Figure 8C). Thus, rhCC16 may protect the lung from CS-induced injury, in part, by increasing Treg and Breg accumulation in the lungs.

Alveolar septal cell phenotypes. Air-exposed Cc16–/– mice had modestly increased alveolar septal cell apoptosis (active caspase-3–positive cells) versus air-exposed WT mice (Figure 9A). CS-exposed and vehicle-treated Cc16–/– mice had greater increases in alveolar septal cell apoptosis than CS-exposed and vehicle-treated WT mice versus air-exposed control mice. RhCC16 treatment abrogated the CS-induced increases in alveolar septal cell apoptosis in both genotypes. CS-exposed and vehicle-treated Cc16–/– mice had lower increases in alveolar septal cell proliferation (Ki67-positive cells) than CS-exposed and vehicle-treated WT mice (Figure 9, C and D). RhCC16 treatment did not increase alveolar septal cell proliferation in either genotype versus CS-exposed and vehicle-treated controls (Figure 9, A and B). The expression of markers of senescence (p21, p16, and Sirtuin) and activation of the β-catenin/Wnt repair pathway (assessed as expression of Wisp-2 or Tcf-7) was similar in all groups (Supplemental Figure 5, A–E).

Treating CS-exposed WT and Cc16–/– mice with rhCC16 reduces alveolar septalFigure 9

Treating CS-exposed WT and Cc16–/– mice with rhCC16 reduces alveolar septal cell apoptosis but not proliferation in their lungs. WT and Cc16–/– mice were exposed to air (6–7 mice/group) or CS for 24 weeks (12–13 mice/group), and CS-exposed mice were treated with rhCC16 (75 μg of rhCC16; 6–7 mice/group) or vehicle (6 mice/group) for thrice weekly the last 12 weeks of the exposures. Inflated lung sections were immunostained for markers of alveolar septal cell apoptosis (active caspase-3; A and B) or proliferation (Ki67; C and D). Arrows point to active caspase-3–positive cells (B) or Ki67-positive cells (D). Boxes in the box plots show the medians and 25th and 75th percentiles, and whiskers show the 10th and 90th percentiles. Data were analyzed using 1-way ANOVAs followed by pairwise testing with Mann-Whitney U tests. Asterisks indicate P < 0.05 vs. air-exposed mice belonging to the same genotype or the group indicated.

The increased pulmonary inflammatory response to CS in Cc16–/– mice is associated with increased activation of NF-κB in their lungs (10). Thus, we determined whether rhCC16 reduces NF-κB activation in CS-exposed WT and/or Cc16–/– lungs. Mice were exposed to CS for 4 weeks to induce an acute pulmonary inflammatory response, and treatment with rhCC16 or vehicle was then initiated via the i.n. route and continued during an additional 4 weeks of CS exposure (Figure 1D). NF-κB translocation to the nucleus was quantified in nuclear extracts of whole lung samples. CS-exposed and vehicle-treated Cc16–/– mice had greater increases in NF-κB activation in their lungs than CS-exposed and vehicle-treated WT mice versus NF-κB activation levels in the lungs of air-exposed control mice belonging to the same genotype (Figure 10A). RhCC16 treatment decreased NF-κB activation only in CS-exposed Cc16–/– lungs. To provide additional assurance that rhCC16 reduces activation of NF-κB, we conducted an in vitro experiment with NF-κB luciferase reporter A549 cells activated with CS extract (CSE) or TNF-α. TNF-α triggered activation of NF-κB in the reporter assay (Figure 10B), but CSE tested at 1%–10% concentrations did not (Supplemental Figure 6). When rhCC16 was added to cells 3 hours before the TNF-α, rhCC16 reduced TNF-α–induced activation of NF-κB (Figure 10B).

Treating CS-exposed Cc16–/– mice with rhCC16 reduces NF-κB activation in thFigure 10

Treating CS-exposed Cc16–/– mice with rhCC16 reduces NF-κB activation in their lungs, and increased NF-κB activation in the lungs of CS-exposed Cc16–/– mice contributes to their exaggerated pulmonary inflammatory response to CS. In A, WT and Cc16–/– mice were exposed to air (6 mice/group) or CS for 8 weeks (6–7 mice/group), and CS-exposed mice were treated thrice weekly with rhCC16 (75 μg of rhCC16) or vehicle. NF-κB that translocated to the nucleus was quantified in nuclear extracts of whole lung samples using a TransAM NF-κB kit. In B, NF-κB luciferase reporter A549 cells were grown to at least 80% confluence and preincubated for 3 hours with 100 μg/mL of rhCC16. Cells were then activated with rhTNF-α (1–10 ng/mL), and 8 hours later, the cells were lysed and luciferase activity was measured. In C, WT and Cc16–/– mice were exposed to air (3–5 mice/group) or CS for 12 weeks (10–12 mice/group), and CS-exposed mice were treated once daily with a solution of IMD0354 (6 mg/kg body weight) or vehicle via the intraperitoneal route during the last 6 weeks of the CS exposures (5–6 mice/group). BAL was performed, and BAL total leukocytes (C), macrophages (D), and PMNs (E) were counted. Boxes in the box plots show the medians and 25th and 75th percentiles, and whiskers show the 10th and 90th percentiles. Data were analyzed using 1-way ANOVAs followed by pairwise testing with Mann-Whitney U tests. In A and C–E, asterisks indicate P < 0.05 vs. air-exposed mice belonging to the same genotype or the group indicated; in B, asterisks indicate P < 0.05 vs. negative control in lane 1 or the group indicated.

NF-κB inhibition with a small molecule inhibitor. To determine whether the increased NF-κB activation detected in the lungs of CS-exposed Cc16–/– mice directly contributes to their exaggerated pulmonary inflammatory response to CS, mice were exposed to CS for 12 weeks and treatment with a small molecule NF-κB inhibitor (IMD0354, IκB kinase-β [IKK2] inhibitor) or vehicle was initiated at the midpoint of these exposures and continued for the second 6 weeks of the exposure (Figure 1D). Treating CS-exposed WT and Cc16–/– mice with IMD0345 reduced BAL total leukocyte and PMN counts in both genotypes, BAL macrophage counts in Cc16–/– mice, and BAL lymphocyte counts in WT mice when compared with counts in CS-exposed and vehicle-treated control mice (Figure 10, C–E, and Supplemental Figure 7A). Thus, rhCC16 protein treatment may reduce the exuberant lung inflammatory response to CS in Cc16–/– mice, in part, by reducing NF-κB activation in their lungs. Although the 12-week CS exposure was insufficient to induce significant airspace enlargement in WT mice, it was sufficient to induce significant SAF in both genotypes (Figure 11). CS-exposed and rhCC16-treated Cc16–/– mice had significantly lower SAF than CS-exposed and vehicle-treated Cc16–/– mice (Figure 11, A and B). Thus, excessive activation of NF-κB in the lungs of CS-exposed Cc16–/– mice is partially responsible for their exaggerated COPD-like disease (27, 28).

Treating CS-exposed WT and Cc16–/– mice with IMD0354 reduces mucus metaplasFigure 11

Treating CS-exposed WT and Cc16–/– mice with IMD0354 reduces mucus metaplasia. In A and B, WT and Cc16–/– mice were exposed to air (3–5 mice/group) or CS for 12 weeks (10–12 mice/group), and CS-exposed mice were treated once daily with a solution of IMD0354 (6 mg/kg body weight; 5–6 mice/group) or vehicle via the intraperitoneal route during the last 6 weeks of the CS exposures (5–6 mice/group). Inflated lung sections with Masson’s trichrome stain (A), which stains ECM proteins blue. The thickness of the layer of ECM deposited around the small airways was quantified (B). The IMD0354-treated Cc16–/– mice had significantly lower ECM deposit compared with vehicle-treated Cc16–/– mice (P = 0.0124). Boxes in the box plots show the medians and 25th and 75th percentiles, and whiskers show the 10th and 90th percentiles. Data were analyzed using 1-way ANOVAs followed by pairwise testing with Mann-Whitney U tests. Asterisks indicate P < 0.05 vs. air-exposed mice belonging to the same genotype or the group indicated.

Discussion

RhCC16 treatment reduced the progression of COPD-like disease (emphysema development, SAF, and CB) in WT and Cc16–/– mice (Figure 12). These changes were associated with reductions in processes that contribute to CS-induced COPD-like disease in mice, including: 1) pulmonary inflammation in WT and Cc16–/– mice, 2) the expression of mediators of inflammation and injury (including Mmps) in the lungs of Cc16–/– mice, 3) alveolar septal cell apoptosis in WT and Cc16–/– mice, and 4) NF-κB activation in Cc16–/– mice. We report for the first time to our knowledge that the increased NF-κB activation associated with the exuberant inflammatory response to CS in Cc16–/– mice directly contributed to their increased COPD-like disease, as delivering an NF-κB inhibitor to Cc16–/– mice reduced their exaggerated pulmonary inflammatory response and SAF, and rhCC16 reduced TNF-α–induced NF-κB activation in A549 NF-κB luciferase reporter cells in vitro.

Beneficial effects of rhCC16 on COPD-like disease in CS-exposed mice.Figure 12

Beneficial effects of rhCC16 on COPD-like disease in CS-exposed mice. Exposing WT and Cc16–/– mice to CS induces a chronic pulmonary inflammatory response (with increases in PMN, macrophage [Mɸ], and CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocyte counts) mediated, in part, by increased NF-κB activation in the lungs. These leukocytes (and activated epithelial cells) release metalloproteinases (Mmps), and/or neutrophil elastase (NE), other proteinases, oxidants, and growth factors that promote emphysema development and SAF, and/or increase Muc5ac and Muc5b expression in airway epithelial cell (mucus metaplasia). CS also promotes emphysema development by increasing alveolar septal cell apoptosis. CS itself and increased levels of PMN-derived NE and Muc5b in CS-exposed airways impair mucociliary clearance (MCC). Epithelial cell mucus metaplasia and impaired MCC contribute to CB-like disease in CS-exposed mice. Delivering rhCC16 to the lungs of CS-exposed mice limits the progression of CS-induced emphysema development, SAF, and CB-like disease in WT and Cc16–/– mice likely by reducing the pulmonary inflammatory response to CS (in part by reducing the exaggerated NF-κB activation in CS-exposed Cc16–/– lungs) and by reducing alveolar septal cell apoptosis. Treating mice with rhCC16 also reduces pulmonary inflammation by increasing Treg and Breg accumulation the lungs, which release antiinflammatory Il-10. The reduction in inflammation induced by rhCC16 may reduce septal cell death and loss of parenchymal architecture. In addition, rhCC16 may limit the progression of CB-like disease in mice by improving MCC by reducing airway mucus cell metaplasia and increasing the expression of Foxj1, which is required for the generation of motile cilia on epithelial cells. EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition.

Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines propose treating COPD patients with short-acting and/or long-acting inhaled bronchodilators and then adding on inhaled corticosteroids as disease severity increases (1, 29). Several combination inhaled therapies modestly improve forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) but do not substantially improve quality of life or eliminate lung function decline in patients with COPD (30–32). Long-acting β2 agonist, long-acting muscarinic antagonist, and corticosteroid triple inhaled combination therapies have reduced mortality in patients with COPD (33, 34) due to reductions in cardiovascular related mortality. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop novel therapies that modify the course of COPD (1).

A prior study reported that treating WT mice with rat rCC16 reduced lung inflammation, emphysema development, and activation of NF-κB in their lungs in a 24-week CS exposure model (35). However, unlike our study, this prior study did not evaluate the effects of rCC16 protein on CS-exposed Cc16–/– mice, CS-induced SAF, or CB-like disease in WT mice. We tested the efficacy of rhCC16 protein in mice as it is the form that would be advanced to clinical trials in patients with COPD.

Emphysema. Lung inflammation (especially increasing in macrophages) is required for CS-induced emphysema development in mice (36, 37). Macrophages contribute to CS-induced emphysema development in mice, in part, by releasing Mmp-12 (which degrades lung elastin) and oxidants (4). PMNs recruited to the lungs initiate and amplify lung inflammation and destruction by releasing proteinases and oxidants (36–38). In acute and/or chronic CS exposures, rhCC16 treatment in WT and Cc16–/– mice reduced lung NF-κB activation and contributed to reduced macrophage and/or PMN counts, leading to reductions in Mmp-9 and Mmp-12 expression levels in the lungs (as these cells are sources of these proteinases) and reductions in emphysema. Macrophages could be a key target cell for rhCC16 given the important contributions of macrophages to CS-induced inflammation and emphysema development and the known activities of CC16 and NF-κB in inhibiting and increasing macrophage activation, respectively (39). Although the CS-exposed lung represents a proteolytic environment, rhCC16 exhibited robust antiinflammatory activities. RhCC16 protein is detectable for several days after delivery to inflamed lungs containing elevated levels of proteinases, including after delivering of a single dose of rhCC16 to animals with experimental acute lung injury or human infants with acute respiratory distress (40–42). We are not aware of any reports identifying proteolytic digestion products of CC16 proteins in biological samples. Thus, rhCC6 may be at least partially resistant to proteolysis in vivo, a feature that is desirable in a protein therapeutic for COPD.

RhCC16 may have reduced lung inflammation and emphysema development in mice via antiinflammatory activities exerted on lung epithelial cells and/or immune cells. Increased NF-κB activation in airway epithelial cells drives pulmonary inflammatory responses to insults other than CS (43, 44). Thus, rhCC16 treatment may have suppressed NF-κB activation in airway epithelial cells to reduce epithelial expression of pro-inflammatory mediators that recruit and activate myeloid leukocytes (45). RhCC16 may also reduce pulmonary inflammation via direct effects on myeloid leukocytes as rhCC16 reduces PMN and monocyte chemotaxis in vitro (46). RhCC16 may also reduce pulmonary inflammation by inhibiting activation of phospholipase A2 (which generates pro-inflammatory lipids) by sequestering a cofactor required for phospholipase A2 activation (47).

Tregs and Bregs. Tregs are antiinflammatory effector cells that are increased or decreased in different lung compartments, or their function is impaired in COPD patients (48). TIGIT expression on Tregs is required for effective suppression of Th1 and Th17 responses and is mediated via TIGIT binding to CD155 expressed on target cells (24). ST2+ expression on Tregs is required for Treg accumulation in injured lungs (49). Surprisingly, CS exposure increased total Treg counts and ST2+ and TIGIT+ Treg counts in Cc16–/– but not WT mice. The increased Treg accumulation in CS-exposed Cc16–/– lungs was probably insufficient to limit CS-induced increases in myeloid leukocyte counts and associated injury to the lung. To our knowledge, we report for the first time that the beneficial effects of rhCC16 on the CS-exposed lung may be due, in part, to increased accumulation of activated Tregs, which may restrain exuberant Th1 and Th17 responses to CS.

B cells contribute to lymphoid follicle development in the lungs of human COPD patients and CS-exposed mice and to COPD progression (50–52). B cell subsets have different functions (52). Bregs produce Il-10 and are defined in mice by their expression of Tim-1 (26). While Bregs downregulate adaptive immune responses in other diseases (53), their contributions to COPD are not known. Breg counts were higher in CS-exposed Cc16–/– mice than WT mice, and treating mice with rhCC16 increased Breg counts in CS-exposed WT and Cc16–/– mice. Tim-1+ B cells induce T cell expression of FOXP3 and differentiation toward the Treg phenotype (54). Thus, rhCC16 treatment may increase Foxp3+ Treg accumulation in CS-exposed lungs by increasing the frequency of pulmonary Bregs.

Dysfunctional adaptive immunity. T cell exhaustion, a state of T cell dysfunction, contributes to the poor control of pulmonary infections in COPD patients, and likely promotes infective exacerbations (55). T cell exhaustion is characterized by the surface expression of immune checkpoint molecules including PD-1 and TIM-3 (23). We report for the first time to our knowledge that CS exposure increased pulmonary Tim-3+CD4+ lymphocyte counts in Cc16–/– (but not WT) mice and increased pulmonary Tim-3+CD8+ lymphocyte counts to a greater extent in Cc16–/– than WT mice. Thus, the reduced CC16 levels that are associated with COPD may contribute to impaired effector T cell responses to pathogens and COPD exacerbations (56). Although rhCC16 treatment did not reduce PD-1 or Tim-3 expression on T or B lymphocytes, or NK cells in CS-exposed WT or Cc16–/– lungs, future studies should investigate the contributions of CC16 to adaptive immunity and immune tolerance/exhaustion in murine models of COPD exacerbations.

Septal cell apoptosis. Excessive alveolar septal cell apoptosis and defective alveolar septal cell repair contribute to emphysema development in CS-exposed animals (57). We report for the first time to our knowledge that rhCC16 treatment reduced CS-induced alveolar septal cell apoptosis in WT and Cc16–/– mice but had no effect on alveolar septal cell proliferation or activation of the pro-repair Wnt/β catenin pathway in the lungs of either genotype. CC16 treatment may have reduced alveolar septal cell apoptosis either via a direct effect on lung epithelial cells or secondary to its effects on reducing pulmonary inflammation.

SAF. SAF contributes to airflow obstruction in COPD and is induced by inflammation and increased expression of growth factors in CS-exposed airways, leading to myofibroblast activation and EMT (58). RhCC16 treatment reduced CS-induced SAF in both genotypes in a Tgf-independent fashion. However, rhCC16 may reduce SAF by other mechanisms not evaluated in this study including by reducing EMT, airway fibroblast activation, and/or epithelial Muc5b expression (59).

CB. Patients with CB have reduced plasma CC16 levels, and reduced plasma CC16 levels are indirectly related to rate of decline in FEV1 in patients with CB (12). However, it has not been clear whether CC16 contributes directly to this COPD phenotype. We report for the first time to our knowledge that CS-exposed Cc16–/– mice had greater CB-like disease than WT mice as assessed by greater increases in mucin gene expression and greater impairment of MCC. Treating CS-exposed WT and Cc16–/– mice with rhCC16 improved CB-like disease by reducing CS-induced increases in Muc5ac and/or Mub5b expression in the lungs and reversing CS-induced impaired MCC in both genotypes. These data support the notion that CC16 deficiency directly contributes to progression of CB in humans and that CC16 augmentation approaches might have utility in reducing progression of this important COPD phenotype.

Mucin gene expression is regulated by several transcription factors, including NF-κB (60), and rhCC16-induced reductions in NF-κB activation in CS-exposed lungs may have contributed to the reduced mucin expression observed in WT and Cc16–/– mice. Effective MCC requires epithelial cells with beating cilia, which move inhaled particles and pathogens toward the pharynx where they are cleared (16, 17). The airway surface layer contains Muc5ac and Muc5b, and Mub5b is crucial for normal MCC in mice (60, 61). Ciliary injury is caused by CS exposure, which promotes autophagic removal of cilia, neutrophil elastase released by activated airway PMNs, and alterations in mucus rheology (16, 62). Foxj1 expression by epithelial cells is crucial for the generation of motile cilia (17, 18). The improvement in MCC mediated by rhCC16 treatment of CS-exposed WT and Cc16–/– mice was likely mediated by rhCC16-induced increases in Foxj1 expression, and reductions in mucin gene expression and pulmonary PMN counts leading to reduced lung levels of neutrophil elastase.

NF-κB pathway. NF-κB activation occurs in the lungs of COPD patients and may contribute to the pathogenesis of COPD (10), but this hypothesis has not been proved. The exaggerated COPD-like disease in CS-exposed Cc16–/– mice is associated with increased NF-κB activation in their lungs (10). Treating CS-exposed WT mice with rat CC16 reduced activation of NF-κB in their lungs (35). In our study, treating CS-exposed Cc16–/– (but not WT) mice with rhCC16 was associated with reduced NF-κB activation in their lungs. Our study supports that the increased NF-κB activation observed in CS-exposed Cc16–/– lungs directly contributes to their exaggerated pulmonary inflammation and SAF as both lesions were reduced by treating CS-exposed Cc16–/– mice with a small molecule (IKK2) NF-κB inhibitor. This notion is further supported by the finding that rhCC16 reduced NF-κB activation in an NF-κB luciferase reporter cell line activated with TNF-α (a cytokine that is elevated in blood samples from COPD patients; ref. 63). The NF-κB inhibitor did not completely inhibit CS-induced pulmonary inflammation in Cc16–/– (or WT) mice, and rhCC16 had a greater impact on several lung pathologies than the NF-κB inhibitor, indicating that rhCC16 mediates its beneficial activities in the CS-exposed lung on signaling pathways other than NF-κB. NF-κB is regulated by different mechanisms, and it is possible that the NF-κB inhibitor’s inhibitory activities were different from those mediated by rhCC16. IKK2 regulates other pathways (64), including cell cycle control and mTOR activation, which were not evaluated in this study.

Limitations. Our study has limitations in the mechanistic approaches. Although CC16 mediates its protective activities in the CS-exposed lung, in part, by inhibiting NF-κB activation, it likely has beneficial activities on other pathways, which we did not identify. We did not determine whether rhCC16 acts on epithelial cells or immune cells or both. This would require the generation of tagged rhCC16, which would be technically challenging given the small size of CC16 (16 kDa) relative to that of standard fluorescent tags (e.g., green fluorescent protein [GFP; Mr ~26 kDa], which has a secondary β-barrel structure). GFP tagging would likely impede the binding of CC16 to its effector molecule via steric hindrance. Newer, smaller tags using only portions of fluorescent tags (65) fused with rhCC16 could be used in future studies to identify the cells to which rhCC16 binds.

We also did not identify the receptor(s) or extracellular molecules to which CC16 binds to mediate its protective effects. CC16 binds to VLA4 integrin and the lipoxin A4 receptor on leukocytes to reduce their activation (66, 67) and the lipocalin-1 receptor on cancer cells to suppress their invasiveness (68). TRICEPS technology (69) will allow the identification of cell surface receptors to which CC16 binds. Future studies will determine whether epithelial and/or immune cells are the key target cells for CC16, the target receptor(s) to which rhCC16 binds, and the genes that are regulated by rhCC16 in these cells.

We did not determine whether rhCC16 restores MCC in CS-exposed mice by promoting ciliogenesis and/or ciliary repair. These mechanistic approaches are beyond the scope of this manuscript but will be the focus of future studies. We were unable to measure lung volumes (as we lack the necessary equipment) or to develop an assay to measure anti-CC16 antibodies in plasma samples in rhCC16-treated mice. Although we demonstrated differences between the Cc16–/– groups, the experiments were not powered to show differences in the WT groups (the power was 0.223 for the WT groups). A sample size calculation indicated that 26–33 WT mice per group would be needed to achieve statistical significance (with power of 0.8), which is twice the sample size recommended in ARRIVE guidelines (70). Finally, inflammatory mediator expression was measured in whole lung samples, which does not provide information on their cellular sources.

Conclusions. Delivering rhCC16 to the lung limited the progression of CS-induced emphysema, SAF, and CB-like disease in WT and Cc16–/– mice, in part, by reducing the pulmonary inflammatory response to CS. Treating Cc16–/– mice with rhCC16 protein reduced their exuberant inflammatory response to CS, in part, by reducing NF-κB activation in their lungs. RhCC16 treatment also reduced CS-induced COPD-like disease in both genotypes via effects on lung epithelial cells by reducing alveolar septal cell apoptosis (thereby reducing emphysema development) and reducing airway mucus cell metaplasia and improving MCC (thereby reducing CB-like disease). We also report potentially novel activities for rhCC16 treatment in reducing adaptive immune responses to CS by increasing functional Treg and Breg cell counts in the CS-exposed lung. These results provide a rationale for evaluating the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of rhCC16 protein augmentation therapy in clinical trials of patients with COPD.

Methods

See Supplemental Methods for additional details.

Animals. Cc16–/– mice were bred in C57BL/6 background and have no abnormalities in the unchallenged state (71). C57BL/6 WT mice were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory. Cc16–/– and WT mouse colonies were housed under identical specific pathogen–free conditions in a barrier facility. Cc16–/– genotype was confirmed using PCR-based protocols performed on DNA extracted from tail biopsies. Adult male and female WT and Cc16–/– mice were used in all experiments and randomized to experimental groups by an individual who was not involved in the conduct of the experiments.

CS exposures. WT and Cc16–/– mice were exposed to air or mixed mainstream and side-stream CS from 1R3F Kentucky Research (University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA) cigarettes 6 days per week in Teague chambers (Figure 1).

RhCC16 protein. This protein (provided by APCBio Innovations, Inc.) was expressed in E. coli and isolated as a 16.1 kDa disulfide-linked homodimer. Purity was assessed using SDS-PAGE and the inhibitory activity of rhCC16 against soluble phospholipase A2 (Cayman Chemical) was measured as described previously (72). All preparations produced ≥90% inhibition of soluble phospholipase A2 activity.

RhCC16 treatments. The initial dose and route of administration for rhCC16 were selected based on previous studies (41, 42). However, we conducted a pilot study in mice by administering rhCC16 (75 μg diluted in 30 μL of endotoxin-free PBS [~2.1–3.75 mg/kg]) or vehicle [endotoxin-free PBS]) thrice weekly during the second 4 weeks of 8-week CS exposures to optimize the dose and dosing frequency before conducting chronic CS exposures in mice. The 75 μg thrice weekly dose of rhCC16 substantially reduced CS-induced acute pulmonary inflammation (Figure 5). Thus, the same dose and thrice weekly dosing regimen was used in all subsequent CS exposure experiments. Mice were exposed to air or CS for 5 or 8 weeks (acute exposures), or 24 weeks (chronic exposures), and CS-exposed mice were treated with rhCC16 or vehicle thrice weekly for the last half of the exposures (Figure 1). Mice were anesthetized with inhaled isoflurane, and rhCC16 or PBS was delivered via the i.n. route 45 minutes after the CS exposure ended.

NF-κB inhibitor studies. Mice were exposed to air or CS for 12 weeks, and CS-exposed mice were treated with IMD0354 (an IKK2 inhibitor; Bio-Techne) at a dose of 6 mg/kg in 200 μL of vehicle (endotoxin-free 0.9% saline solution containing 0.5% ethanol and 1% Tween 80) or 200 μL of vehicle alone delivered by the intraperitoneal route once daily beginning at the midpoint of the exposures. The IMD0354 dose selected was based on data from studies showing that this dose abrogated ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats (73). At the end of the exposures, mice were euthanized, BAL was performed, and lungs were inflated and fixed in formalin (19).

Emphysema and SAF. Inflated lung sections (14) were stained with Gill’s to quantify airspace enlargement. Briefly, lung sections were stained with a mixture of equal parts of Gill’s no. 3 and Harris modified hematoxylin solution (both MilliporeSigma). Images of both lungs were captured at 200× original magnification using a Nikon Eclipse Ts2 microscope (15–20 images/mouse). Scion Image software (Scion Corp.) was used to measure alveolar chord lengths (14, 19). SAF was measured on Masson’s trichrome–stained lung sections. Briefly, the mean airway luminal diameter and the thickness of the subepithelial layer of extracellular matrix protein deposited around airways having a mean diameter of 300–699 microns were measured at 12 equidistant sites around each airway using MetaMorph software (Molecular Devices). The mean ± SEM thickness of the subepithelial layer of extracellular matrix layer in microns was calculated. Sections of airways sharing their adventitia with arteries were not included in the analysis (14, 19).

MCC. Mice were exposed to CS for 5 weeks. Mice were treated thrice weekly with rhCC16 or vehicle during the last 2 weeks of the 5-week CS exposures. 99mTc-sc was instilled into the lungs of anesthetized mice by oropharyngeal aspiration, and the efficiency of 99mTc-sc clearance from lungs was measured with noninvasive 3D μ-SPECT functional imaging, as described previously (16).

Pulmonary inflammation. Total leukocytes and leukocyte subsets were counted in BAL samples (19). Right lungs were enzymatically digested (20), and single-cell suspensions were stained for markers of T or B lymphocytes, or NK cells, or lymphocyte effector cell function or exhaustion (Supplemental Table 4) and analyzed using flow cytometry.

Respiratory mechanics. After the last day of CS or air exposure, mice were anesthetized, a tracheostomy was performed, and an 18-gauge cannula was inserted in the trachea (14). The animals were connected by the cannula to a digitally controlled mechanical ventilator (FlexiVent device; Scireq Inc.). Respiratory mechanics were measured, and then the mice were humanely euthanized.

Gene expression studies. The expression of Ccl-2, Ccl-3, Ccl-5, Il-6, Tnf-α, Il-10, Tgf-β, Foxj1, Muc5ac, Muc5b, Muc1, Mmp-9, Mmp-12, p16, p21, Sirtuin, Wisp, and Tcf-7 was quantified in lungs using RT-qPCR, Ppia as the housekeeping gene, and the comparative threshold method. Supplemental Table 5 shows the primer sequences used.

Immunofluorescence staining of lung sections. Lung sections were immunostained for Foxj1, Muc5ac, cleaved caspase-3, or Ki67, or with appropriate nonimmune IgGs (Thermo Fisher Scientific), as described in the Supplemental Methods.

NF-κB activation. Proteins were isolated from nuclear extracts of whole lungs using a kit (Abcam). NF-κB was quantified in nuclear protein extracts using a TransAM NF-κB kit (Active Motif).

NF-κB luciferase assay. NF-κB luciferase reporter A549 cells (Lonza) (74) were preincubated with 100 μg of rhCC16 for 3 hours, followed by either CSE at 1%–10% or 1–10 ng/mL rhTNF-α (Peprotech). See Supplemental Methods for more details.

Statistics. Statistical analyses were performed using SigmaPlot software (Systat). Sample sizes were calculated based on an estimated effect size of a 20% difference between the groups, 80% power, and α = 0.05 resulting in planned samples sizes of 4–10 mice per group. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to determine normality, and the Brown-Forsythe test was used to assess equal variance. Data were analyzed using 1-way ANOVAs for continuous data, followed by post hoc testing with 2-sided Student’s t tests or Mann-Whitney U test, according to distribution. Parametric data are presented as mean ± SEM, and nonparametric are presented as box plots showing medians and 25th and 75th percentiles and whiskers showing 10th and 90th percentiles. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Study approval. All procedures performed on mice were approved by the Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH) Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Author contributions

CAO designed the project. CAO, JRQ, MELC, and ALP designed the experiments. CAO, JRQ, MELC, XW, QAF, PRB, SJK, DZ, YL, LZ, and HK conducted experiments and analyzed data. JRQ, MELC, ARB, FP, YT, BC, ALP, and CAO contributed to data interpretation. JRQ and CAO wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Supplemental material

View Supplemental data

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NIH National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) grant AI111475-01; NIH National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute P01 grants HL105339 and HL114501; NIAID grant AI111475-01; The Parker B Francis Foundation; Flight Attendants Medical Research Institute grant CIA123046; the BWH Respiratory Research Institute Consortium; and the Department of Defense grant PR152060.

Address correspondence to: Caroline Owen, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, 3016H, Hale Building, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Email: cowenusa@yahoo.com.

Footnotes

CAO’s present address is: Early Clinical Development (Respiratory and Immunology), AstraZeneca BioPharmaceuticals R&D, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.

Conflict of interest: CAO is an employee of and owns stock in AstraZeneca BioPharmaceuticals.

Authorship note: FP and CAO contributed equally to this work.

Copyright: © 2023, Rojas-Quintero et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reference information: JCI Insight. 2023;8(6):e130771.https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.130771.

References
  1. Celli B, Wedzicha JA. Update on clinical aspects of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(13):1257–1256.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  2. GBD 2015 Chronic Respiratory Disease CollaboratorsGlobal, regional, and national deaths, prevalence, disability-adjusted life years, and years lived with disability for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease study 2015. Lancet Respir Med. 2017;5(9):691–706.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Montes de Oca M, et al. Smoke, biomass exposure, and COPD risk in the primary care setting: the PUMA study. Respir Care. 2017;62(8):1058–1066.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Owen CA. Roles for proteinases in the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2008;3(2):253–268.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Laucho-Contreras ME, et al. Club cell protein 16 (Cc16) deficiency increases inflamm-aging in the lungs of mice. Physiol Rep. 2018;6(15):e13797.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Chen LC, et al. Cutting edge: altered pulmonary eosinophilic inflammation in mice deficient for Clara cell secretory 10-kDa protein. J Immunol. 2001;167(6):3025–3028.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Snyder JC, et al. Clara cells attenuate the inflammatory response through regulation of macrophage behavior. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2010;42(2):161–171.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Laucho-Contreras ME, et al. Club cell protein 16 (CC16) augmentation: a potential disease-modifying approach for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2016;20(7):869–883.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Lomas DA, et al. Evaluation of COPD longitudinally to identify predictive surrogate endpoints (ECLIPSE) investigators. Evaluation of serum CC-16 as a biomarker for COPD in the ECLIPSE cohort. Thorax. 2008;63(12):1058–1063.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Laucho-Contreras ME, et al. Protective role for club cell secretory protein-16 (CC16) in the development of COPD. Eur Respir J. 2015;45(6):1544–1556.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Zhu L, et al. Repression of CC16 by cigarette smoke (CS) exposure. PLoS One. 2015;10(1):e0116159.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Petersen H, et al. Low plasma CC16 levels in smokers are associated with a higher risk for chronic bronchitis. Eur Respir J. 2015;46(5):1501–1503.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Staudt MR, et al. Airway Basal stem/progenitor cells have diminished capacity to regenerate airway epithelium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190(8):955–958.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Laucho-Contreras ME, et al. Automated measurement of pulmonary emphysema and small airway remodeling in cigarette smoke-exposed mice. J Vis Exp. 2015;(95):52236.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Tufvesson E, et al. Increase of club cell (Clara) protein (CC16) in plasma and urine after exercise challenge in asthmatics and healthy controls, and correlations to exhaled breath temperature and exhaled nitric oxide. Respir Med. 2013;107(11):1675–1681.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Lam HC, et al. Histone deacetylase 6-mediated selective autophagy regulates COPD-associated cilia dysfunction. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(12):5212–5230.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Munkholm M, Mortensen J. Mucociliary clearance: pathophysiological aspects. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2014;34(3):171–177.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  18. Jain R, et al. Temporal relationship between primary and motile ciliogenesis in airway epithelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2010;43(6):731–739.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Polverino F, et al. A disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-8: a novel protective proteinase in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198(10):1254–1267.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Rojas-Quintero J, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 deficiency protects mice from severe influenza A viral infection. JCI Insight. 2018;3(24):e99022.
    View this article via: JCI Insight CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  21. McKendry RT, et al. Dysregulation of antiviral function of CD8(+) T cells in the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease lung. Role of the PD-1-PD-L1 axis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193(6):642–651.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Anderson AC, et al. Lag-3, Tim-3, and TIGIT: co-inhibitory receptors with specialized functions in immune regulation. Immunity. 2016;44(5):989–1004.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Joller N, et al. Treg cells expressing the coinhibitory molecule TIGIT selectively inhibit proinflammatory Th1 and Th17 cell responses. Immunity. 2014;40(4):569–581.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Halvorsen EC, et al. IL-33 increases ST2+ Tregs and promotes metastatic tumour growth in the lungs in an amphiregulin-dependent manner. Oncoimmunology. 2018;8(2):e1527497.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Matta BM, Turnquist HR. Expansion of regulatory T cells in vitro and in vivo by IL-33. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1371:29–41.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Ding Q, et al. Regulatory B cells are identified by expression of TIM-1 and can be induced through TIM-1 ligation to promote tolerance in mice. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(9):3645–3656.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Di Stefano A, et al. Increased expression of nuclear factor-κB in bronchial biopsies from smokers and patients with COPD. Eur Respir J. 2002;20(3):556–563.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Brown V, et al. Dysregulated apoptosis and NFκB expression in COPD subjects. Respir Res. 2009;10(1):24.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  29. GOLDCOPD. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. https://goldcopd.org/ Accessed February 14, 2023.
  30. Calverley PM, et al. ; TORCH investigators. Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate and survival in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(8):775–789.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  31. Tashkin DP, et al. ; UPLIFT study investigators. A 4-year trial of tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(15):1543–1554.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  32. Vestbo J, et al. ; SUMMIT Investigators. Fluticasone furoate and vilanterol and survival in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with heightened cardiovascular risk (SUMMIT): a double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10030):1817–1826.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  33. Martinez FJ, et al. Reduced all-cause mortality in the ETHOS trial of budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-group study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021;203(5):553–564.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  34. Lipson DA et al. Once-daily single-inhaler triple versus dual therapy in patients with COPD. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(18):1671–1680.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  35. Pang M, et al. Recombinant club cell protein 16 (CC16) ameliorates cigarette smoke‑induced lung inflammation in a murine disease model of COPD. Mol Med Rep. 2018;18(2):2198–2206.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Ofulue AF, Ko M. Effects of depletion of neutrophils or macrophages on development of cigarette smoke-induced emphysema. Am J Physiol. 1999;277(1):L97–L105.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  37. Kassim SY, et al. NADPH oxidase restrains the matrix metalloproteinase activity of macrophages. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(34):30201–30205.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Shapiro SD, et al. Neutrophil elastase contributes to cigarette smoke-induced emphysema in mice. Am J Pathol. 2003;163(6):2329–2335.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Lin J, et al. The rCC16 protein protects against LPS-induced cell apoptosis and inflammatory responses in human lung pneumocytes. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:1060.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  40. Miller TL, et al. Recombinant human Clara cell secretory protein in acute lung injury of the rabbit: effect of route of administration. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005;6(6):698–706.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Chandra S, et al. Safety and efficacy of intratracheal recombinant human Clara cell protein in a newborn piglet model of acute lung injury. Pediatr Res. 2003;54(4):509–515.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  42. Levine CR, et al. The safety, pharmacokinetics, and anti-inflammatory effects of intratracheal recombinant human Clara cell protein in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatr Res. 2005;58(1):15–21.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  43. Hergrueter AH, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases: all the RAGE in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2011;300(4):L512–L515.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  44. Poynter ME, et al. A prominent role for airway epithelial NF-kappa B activation in lipopolysaccharide-induced airway inflammation. J Immunol. 2003;170(12):6257–6265.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  45. Janssen-Heininger YM, et al. Nuclear factor kappaB, airway epithelium, and asthma: avenues for redox control. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2009;6(3):249–255.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  46. Côté O, et al. Secretoglobin 1A1 and 1A1A differentially regulate neutrophil reactive oxygen species production, phagocytosis and extracellular trap formation. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e96217.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  47. Shiyu S, et al. Polydatin up-regulates Clara cell secretory protein to suppress phospholipase A2 of lung induced by LPS in vivo and in vitro. BMC Cell Biol. 2011;12:31.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  48. Tan DB, et al. Impaired function of regulatory T-cells in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Immunobiology. 2014;219(12):975–979.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  49. Liu Q, et al. IL-33-mediated IL-13 secretion by ST2+ Tregs controls inflammation after lung injury. JCI Insight. 2019;4(6):e123919.
    View this article via: JCI Insight CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  50. Bracke KR, et al. Role of CXCL13 in cigarette smoke-induced lymphoid follicle formation and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188(3):343–355.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  51. Polverino F, et al. Increased expression of a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) in lung leukocytes and alveolar epithelial cells in COPD patients with non small cell lung cancer: a possible link between COPD and lung cancer? Multidiscip Respir Med. 2016;11:17.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  52. Polverino F, et al. B cells in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: moving to center stage. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2016;311(4):L687–L695.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  53. Sarvaria A, et al. B cell regulation in cancer and anti-tumor immunity. Cell Mol Immunol. 2017;14(8):662–674.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  54. Zhu G, et al. CD27+TIM-1+ memory B cells promoted the development of Foxp3+ Tregs and were associated with better survival in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Immunol Res. 2018;66(2):281–287.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  55. Wilkinson TMA. Immune checkpoints in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir Rev. 2017;26(144):170045.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  56. Bhat TA, et al. Immune dysfunction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12(suppl 2):S169–S175.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  57. Voelkel NF, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor in the lung. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2006;290(2):L209–L221.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  58. Courtney JM, Spafford PL. The role of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cells Tissues Organs. 2017;203(2):99–104.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  59. Hancock LA, et al. Muc5b overexpression causes mucociliary dysfunction and enhances lung fibrosis in mice. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):5363.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  60. Thai P, et al. Regulation of airway mucin gene expression. Annu Rev Physiol. 2008;70:405–429.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  61. Kirkham S, et al. MUC5B is the major mucin in the gel phase of sputum in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178(10):1033–1039.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  62. Smallman LA, et al. Reduction of ciliary beat frequency in vitro by sputum from patients with bronchiectasis: a serine proteinase effect. Thorax. 1984;39(9):663–667.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  63. Von Haehling S, et al. Elevated TNFalpha production in whole blood in patients with severe COPD: the potential link to disease severity. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2009;121(9–10):303–308.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  64. Page A, et al. Context-dependent role of IKKβ in cancer. Genes (Basel). 2017;8(12):376.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  65. Kamiyama D, et al. Versatile protein tagging in cells with split fluorescent protein. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11046.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  66. Johnson MDL, et al. CC16 binding to α4β1 integrin protects against Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021;203(11):1410–1418.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  67. Antico G, et al. Uteroglobin, a possible ligand of the lipoxin receptor inhibits serum amyloid A-driven inflammation. Mediators Inflamm. 2014;2014:876395.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  68. Zhang Z, et al. Interaction of uteroglobin with lipocalin-1 receptor suppresses cancer cell motility and invasion. Gene. 2006;369:66–71.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  69. Frei AP, et al. Direct identification of ligand-receptor interactions on living cells and tissues. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30(10):997–1001.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  70. Kilkenny C, et al. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2010;8(6):e1000412.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  71. Stripp BR, et al. Clara cell secretory protein: a determinant of PCB bioaccumulation in mammals. Am J Physiol. 1996;271(4 pt 1):L656–L664.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  72. Cai Y, et al. Preclinical evaluation of human secretoglobin 3A2 in mouse models of lung development and fibrosis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2014;306(1):L10–L22.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  73. Onai Y, et al. Inhibition of IkappaB phosphorylation in cardiomyocytes attenuates myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res. 2004;63(1):51–59.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  74. Marcos-Vadillo E, García-Sánchez A. Promoter assay using luciferase reporter gene in the A549 cell line. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1434:199–211.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (February 14, 2023): In-Press Preview
  • Version 2 (March 22, 2023): Electronic publication

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Share this article
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts