Research ArticleHematologyOncology Free access | 10.1172/jci.insight.98094
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy,
2Division of Cardiology,
3Department of Medicine, and
4Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
5Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
6Duke University School of Nursing and
7Department of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Robert J. Lefkowitz, Duke University Medical Center Box 3821, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. Phone: 919.684.2974; Email: lefko001@receptor-biol.duke.edu.
Find articles by Rein, L. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy,
2Division of Cardiology,
3Department of Medicine, and
4Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
5Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
6Duke University School of Nursing and
7Department of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Robert J. Lefkowitz, Duke University Medical Center Box 3821, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. Phone: 919.684.2974; Email: lefko001@receptor-biol.duke.edu.
Find articles by Wisler, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy,
2Division of Cardiology,
3Department of Medicine, and
4Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
5Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
6Duke University School of Nursing and
7Department of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Robert J. Lefkowitz, Duke University Medical Center Box 3821, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. Phone: 919.684.2974; Email: lefko001@receptor-biol.duke.edu.
Find articles by Kim, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy,
2Division of Cardiology,
3Department of Medicine, and
4Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
5Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
6Duke University School of Nursing and
7Department of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Robert J. Lefkowitz, Duke University Medical Center Box 3821, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. Phone: 919.684.2974; Email: lefko001@receptor-biol.duke.edu.
Find articles by Theriot, B. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy,
2Division of Cardiology,
3Department of Medicine, and
4Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
5Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
6Duke University School of Nursing and
7Department of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Robert J. Lefkowitz, Duke University Medical Center Box 3821, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. Phone: 919.684.2974; Email: lefko001@receptor-biol.duke.edu.
Find articles by Huang, L. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy,
2Division of Cardiology,
3Department of Medicine, and
4Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
5Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
6Duke University School of Nursing and
7Department of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Robert J. Lefkowitz, Duke University Medical Center Box 3821, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. Phone: 919.684.2974; Email: lefko001@receptor-biol.duke.edu.
Find articles by Price, T. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy,
2Division of Cardiology,
3Department of Medicine, and
4Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
5Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
6Duke University School of Nursing and
7Department of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Robert J. Lefkowitz, Duke University Medical Center Box 3821, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. Phone: 919.684.2974; Email: lefko001@receptor-biol.duke.edu.
Find articles by Yang, H. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy,
2Division of Cardiology,
3Department of Medicine, and
4Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
5Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
6Duke University School of Nursing and
7Department of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Robert J. Lefkowitz, Duke University Medical Center Box 3821, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. Phone: 919.684.2974; Email: lefko001@receptor-biol.duke.edu.
Find articles by Chen, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy,
2Division of Cardiology,
3Department of Medicine, and
4Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
5Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
6Duke University School of Nursing and
7Department of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Robert J. Lefkowitz, Duke University Medical Center Box 3821, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. Phone: 919.684.2974; Email: lefko001@receptor-biol.duke.edu.
Find articles by Chen, W. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy,
2Division of Cardiology,
3Department of Medicine, and
4Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
5Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
6Duke University School of Nursing and
7Department of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Robert J. Lefkowitz, Duke University Medical Center Box 3821, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. Phone: 919.684.2974; Email: lefko001@receptor-biol.duke.edu.
Find articles by Sipkins, D. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy,
2Division of Cardiology,
3Department of Medicine, and
4Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
5Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
6Duke University School of Nursing and
7Department of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Robert J. Lefkowitz, Duke University Medical Center Box 3821, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. Phone: 919.684.2974; Email: lefko001@receptor-biol.duke.edu.
Find articles by Fedoriw, Y. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy,
2Division of Cardiology,
3Department of Medicine, and
4Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
5Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
6Duke University School of Nursing and
7Department of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Robert J. Lefkowitz, Duke University Medical Center Box 3821, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. Phone: 919.684.2974; Email: lefko001@receptor-biol.duke.edu.
Find articles by Walker, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy,
2Division of Cardiology,
3Department of Medicine, and
4Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
5Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
6Duke University School of Nursing and
7Department of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Robert J. Lefkowitz, Duke University Medical Center Box 3821, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. Phone: 919.684.2974; Email: lefko001@receptor-biol.duke.edu.
Find articles by Premont, R. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy,
2Division of Cardiology,
3Department of Medicine, and
4Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
5Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
6Duke University School of Nursing and
7Department of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Robert J. Lefkowitz, Duke University Medical Center Box 3821, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. Phone: 919.684.2974; Email: lefko001@receptor-biol.duke.edu.
Find articles by Lefkowitz, R. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Published December 21, 2017 - More info
Primary myelofibrosis is a myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with significant morbidity and mortality, for which effective therapies are lacking. β-Arrestins are multifunctional adaptor proteins involved in developmental signaling pathways. One isoform, β-arrestin2 (βarr2), has been implicated in initiation and progression of chronic myeloid leukemia, another myeloproliferative neoplasm closely related to primary myelofibrosis. Accordingly, we investigated the relationship between βarr2 and primary myelofibrosis. In a murine model of MPLW515L-mutant primary myelofibrosis, mice transplanted with donor βarr2-knockout (βarr2–/–) hematopoietic stem cells infected with MPL-mutant retrovirus did not develop myelofibrosis, whereas controls uniformly succumbed to disease. Although transplanted βarr2–/– cells homed properly to marrow, they did not repopulate long-term due to increased apoptosis and decreased self-renewal of βarr2–/– cells. In order to assess the effect of acute loss of βarr2 in established primary myelofibrosis in vivo, we utilized a tamoxifen-induced Cre-conditional βarr2-knockout mouse. Mice that received Cre (+) donor cells and developed myelofibrosis had significantly improved survival compared with controls. These data indicate that lack of antiapoptotic βarr2 mediates marrow failure of murine hematopoietic stem cells overexpressing MPLW515L. They also indicate that βarr2 is necessary for progression of primary myelofibrosis, suggesting that it may serve as a novel therapeutic target in this disease.
Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) characterized by clonal proliferation of myeloid cells and secondary marrow fibrosis. PMF patients have significant disease-related morbidity (pancytopenia, hepatosplenomegaly, constitutional symptoms, weight loss) and a 15%–20% chance of transformation to acute leukemia, which is almost uniformly fatal despite aggressive management (1, 2). Current therapeutic options are limited and include JAK inhibitors; interferons; symptom-directed therapies, including steroids and cytoreductive agents; and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Unfortunately, highly effective therapies for this progressive, debilitating disease are lacking and novel therapies are needed (3–5).
The gain-of-function mutation in JAK2, JAK2V617F, occurs in 45%–50% of PMF patients, while the myeloproliferative leukemia (MPL) gene mutation of the thrombopoietin receptor, MPLW515L, occurs in 5%–10% of PMF patients. Such mutations lead to enhanced signaling downstream of hematopoietic-specific cytokine receptors, including thrombopoietin. Interestingly, expression of both mutations in murine and human HSCs leads to cytokine-independent growth, with constitutive activation of downstream signaling pathways, including the JAK/STAT pathway (6–8). Agents targeting JAK2 have proven effective in patients with or without targeted mutations, suggesting that additional signaling pathways are involved in disease pathogenesis. Accordingly, alternative mechanisms of direct and indirect JAK/STAT activation have been described (9–11).
Recently, we investigated the role of β-arrestins in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), another MPN of HSCs characterized by excess cell proliferation (12). β-Arrestin1 (βarr1) and β-arrestin2 (βarr2) are multifunctional adaptor proteins originally identified as negative regulators of G protein–mediated signaling. G protein–coupled receptors bind extracellular ligands and activate second messenger–mediated intracellular signaling pathways, making them ideal drug targets in many diseases (13). β-Arrestins have also been identified as mediators of distinct signaling cascades independent of G proteins (14). This work has led to the investigation of β-arrestins’ role in cancers, including lung, colon, breast, and hematologic malignancies (15, 16).
Our recent work utilizing a mouse CML model demonstrated that lack of βarr2 decreased incidence and hindered progression of disease due to altered Wnt/β-catenin signaling. This study suggested that long-term HSC self-renewal is dependent on βarr2-mediated signaling, especially under conditions of increased cellular stress (12). However, the role of β-arrestins in other MPNs remains to be characterized. Here, we examined the role of β-arrestins in the initiation of MPLW515L-mutant PMF. Additionally, using a conditional transgenic mouse model, we demonstrate that deleting βarr2 from established PMF mitigates the course of disease. Ultimately, we aimed to identify novel therapeutic targets in a disease for which effective therapies are severely lacking.
βarr2 is necessary for development of PMF in a murine model of disease. To assess β-arrestins’ role in PMF development, we utilized WT, βarr1-knockout (βarr1–/–), and βarr2-knockout (βarr2–/–) KLS (c-Kit+, Sca-1+, Lin–) cells and standard retroviral transduction systems to model MPLW515L-mutant PMF (17, 18). Signs of murine PMF included leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, anemia, hepatosplenomegaly, and weight loss. To ensure that no baseline differences in global knockout mice were present, we characterized hematologic parameters, including white blood cells (WBCs), platelets, and hemoglobin, in these animals (Supplemental Figure 1A; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.98094DS1). All hematologic parameters were phenotypically similar excluding WBCs, which were higher in WT mice compared with βarr1–/– and βarr2–/– mice. Despite being significantly increased, the average WBC count for WT mice remained within the normal range for mice on a C57BL/6J background. WBC counts for the βarr1–/– and βarr2–/– mice were similarly within the normal range for mice on a C57BL/6J background. The percentage of KLS cells harvested from marrow as well as liver and spleen size were similar across genotypes (Supplemental Figure 1, B and C).
To assess β-arrestin involvement in the development of PMF, donor WT, βarr1–/–, and βarr2–/– KLS cells were harvested, infected with MPLW515L-GFP–expressing retrovirus, resorted for GFP expression by flow cytometry, and injected into lethally irradiated recipient mice (Supplemental Figure 2). Mice that received βarr2–/– cells had dramatically increased median survival, with only 1 of 16 mice dead by the study endpoint compared with mice receiving WT or βarr1–/– cells (median survival 50 and 41 days) (P < 0.0001) (Figure 1A). The spleen-to-body ratio at death was larger in mice receiving WT or βarr1–/– cells (2.98% and 4.16%) compared with mice receiving βarr2–/– cells (0.44%, P < 0.0001; Figure 1B). The liver-to-body ratio at death was also larger in mice receiving WT or βarr1–/– cells (11.84% and 10.58%) compared with mice receiving βarr2–/– cells (4.09%, P < 0.0001; Figure 1B). Blood samples were obtained weekly from surviving mice for analysis. WBCs and platelets were lower over time in mice receiving βarr2–/– cells versus mice receiving either WT or βarr1–/– cells (WBCs, P < 0.01 for interaction, P < 0.0001 WT versus βarr2–/–, P < 0.0001 βarr1–/– versus βarr2–/– and platelets, P < 0.05 for interaction, P < 0.0001 WT versus βarr2–/–, P < 0.0001 βarr1–/– versus βarr2–/–). Hemoglobin was also high over time in mice receiving βarr2–/– cells (P < 0.0001 for interaction). Interestingly, mice that received βarr2–/– cells had minimal donor cell engraftment over time versus mice receiving WT or βarr1–/– cells (P < 0.05 for interaction, P < 0.0001 WT vs. βarr2–/– and βarr1–/– vs. βarr2–/–) (Figure 1C).
β-Arrestin2 is necessary for development of primary myelofibrosis in a murine disease model. WT, β-arrestin1–knockout (βarr1–/–), and β-arrestin2–knockout (βarr2–/–) KLS cells and a retroviral transduction system were used to model MPLW515L-mutant primary myelofibrosis (PMF). (A) Median survival of mice receiving MPLW515L-expressing βarr2–/– donor cells is longer compared with WT or βarr1–/– cell recipients by log-rank Mantel-Cox test (****P < 0.0001). (B) Spleen-to-body and liver-to-body ratios were lower in mice receiving βarr2–/– donor cells (****P < 0.0001, 1-way ANOVA). (C) White blood cells (WBCs) were lower over time in mice receiving βarr2–/– cells versus WT or βarr1–/– cells (****P < 0.0001 for time/row factor, P < 0.01 for interaction, P < 0.0001 WT vs. βarr2–/–, P < 0.0001 βarr1–/– vs. βarr2–/–). Platelets were lower in mice receiving βarr2–/– cells versus WT or βarr1–/– cells (****P < 0.0001 for time/row factor, P < 0.05 for interaction, P < 0.0001 WT vs. βarr2–/–, P < 0.0001 βarr1–/– vs. βarr2–/–). Hemoglobin was higher over time in mice receiving βarr2–/– cells versus WT or βarr1–/– cells (****P < 0.0001 for time/row factor, P < 0.0001 for interaction). Donor chimerism was lower over time in mice receiving βarr2–/– cells versus WT or βarr1–/– cells (****P < 0.0001 for time/row factor, P < 0.05 for interaction, P < 0.0001 WT vs. βarr2–/– and βarr1–/– vs. βarr2–/–). Two-way ANOVA was used for all analyses. No differences were noted in mice receiving WT vs. βarr1–/– donor cells for all secondary measures. WT, n = 11; βarr1–/–, n = 12; βarr2–/–, n = 16.
These findings, taken together, indicate that mice receiving βarr2–/– cells do not develop PMF, due to lack of engraftment of donor cells, while mice receiving WT or βarr1–/– cells engraft and develop disease. Histologic development of fibrosis in mice receiving WT or βarr1–/– cells was consistent with this conclusion (Supplemental Figure 3).
Donor KLS cells from βarr2–/– mice home to marrow but fail to engraft and repopulate the marrow. To establish PMF in our mouse model, donor cells must home to marrow and engraft for long-term repopulation. These processes are regulated by common signaling mechanisms. Homing is rapid, occurs within hours of transplant, does not require cell division, and involves multiple cell types. Engraftment, both short and long-term, and subsequent marrow repopulation occur over weeks to months and require active cell division and HSC maintenance for success (19). Interestingly, β-arrestins have been implicated in regulating cell homing (20–24). As described above, mice that received βarr2–/– donor cells failed to achieve long-term engraftment. To determine if this is due to altered homing of donor cells, we performed in vivo imaging. WT, βarr1–/–, and βarr2–/– KLS cells were harvested and infected with MPLW515L-expressing retrovirus. Prior to injection into recipients, donor cells were labeled with DiR, a fluorescent, lipophilic dye. Microscopy of calvarial bone was utilized to determine the number of donor cells present in marrow 20 hours after transplant (Figure 2, A and B). No differences were noted across the 3 genotypes, indicating proper homing of all cells (Figure 2C). Failure of βarr2–/– cells to repopulate marrow is, therefore, not due to altered homing.
Donor KLS cells from WT, β-arrestin1–knockout, and β-arrestin2–knockout mice home to marrow. (A) Montage image and zoom of mouse calvarium engrafted with DiR+ cells (gray = bone marrow vasculature, Dex-Cy5; red = DiR+ cells). Scale bars: calvarium: 400 μm; zoom image: 75 μm. (B) Representative images of WT, βarr1–/–, and βarr2–/– cells homing to calvarial bone marrow. In vivo imaging performed +20 hours after engraftment. Representative images of n = 3 experiments. Scale bars: 75 μm. (C) Cell homing count for WT, βarr1–/–, and βarr2–/– cells (mean ± SEM; n = 3). βarr1–/–, β-arrestin1 knockout; βarr2–/–, β-arrestin2 knockout.
βarr2–/– KLS cells demonstrate no change in proliferation and both increased apoptosis and decreased self-renewal capabilities in conditions of cellular stress. Our lab and others have shown that lack of βarr2 renders various cells more prone to apoptosis (25, 26). To investigate mechanisms by which βarr2–/– cells fail to repopulate marrow, we performed proliferation and apoptosis assays using murine KLS cells. To assess proliferation, we measured 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) incorporation, which detects DNA synthesis in proliferating cells. The percentage of EdU+ cells was increased similarly in WT, βarr1–/–, and βarr2–/– MPLW515L-treated cells (72.2%, 76.64%, 73.93%) compared with no treatment (48.59%, 44.83%, 49.0%). There was no difference in basal proliferation among the 3 genotypes of cells (Figure 3A). Additionally, [3H]thymidine incorporation assays performed measured DNA synthesis in proliferation. Data from both 4- and 24-hour incubation time points were consistent with EdU incorporation (Supplemental Figure 4, A and B). Data from both EdU and [3H]thymidine incorporation demonstrate that β-arrestins do not regulate KLS cell proliferation.
β-Arrestin2–knockout KLS cells demonstrate no differences in proliferation, increased apoptosis, and decreased self-renewal in the setting of MPLW515L-mutant retrovirus. (A) 5-Ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) incorporation to measure proliferation was increased in each genotype of Should be MPLW515L-treated KLS cells versus untreated control cells of corresponding genotype (*P < 0.05) by 1-way ANOVA. Within each condition, no differences were observed between genotypes. (B) β-Arrestin2–knockout (βarr2–/–) MPLW515L-treated cells had significantly increased apoptosis, as measured by annexin staining versus WT MPLW515L-treated and β-arrestin1–knockout (βarr1–/–) MPLW515L-treated cells by 1-way ANOVA (*P < 0.05). (C) Colony formation by KLS cells from WT, βarr1–/–, and βarr2–/– mice plated in triplicate in methylcellulose media. βarr2–/– MPLW515L-treated KLS cells had decreased colony formation versus WT MPLW515L-treated and βarr1–/– MPLW515L-treated cells by 1-way ANOVA (**P < 0.01). All experiments were done in triplicate. (A) n = 3; (B) n = 7 untreated, n = 3 MPLWT, n = 5 MPLW515L; (C) n > 3.
To assess effects of β-arrestins on apoptosis, annexin V and propidium iodide were used as markers of apoptosis (27) and dead cells. Interestingly, βarr2–/– MPLW515L-expressing KLS cells had a greater than 50% increase in apoptosis compared with βarr1–/– MPLW515L-expressing (P < 0.05) and WT MPLW515L-expressing KLS cells (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in apoptosis among KLS cells subjected to no treatment and, more importantly, KLS cells treated with MPLWT retrovirus (Figure 3B). These data indicate that KLS cells lacking βarr2 are more prone to undergo programmed cell death under conditions of increased stress, such as those see in our MPLW515L-mutant PMF model, and may explain failure of βarr2–/– cells to repopulate marrow in our mouse model.
Finally, to assess stem cell self-renewal capabilities, we performed colony-forming cell assays with WT, βarr1–/–, and βarr2–/– KLS cells in no treatment and MPLWT- and MPLW515L-treated conditions. We did not find any differences in number of colonies formed with untreated and MPLWT-treated KLS cells. However, significantly fewer colonies formed with βarr2–/– MPLW515L-treated KLS cells, suggesting that lack of βarr2–/– hinders PMF stem cell self-renewal in vitro (Figure 3C). Taken together, we conclude that PMF development is mediated by βarr2, with no phenotypically detectable contribution from βarr1. We also conclude that lack of antiapoptotic βarr2 mediates bone marrow failure of murine HSCs overexpressing MPLW515L.
βarr2 protein expression can be dramatically diminished using a global conditional knockout mouse. To investigate effect of βarr2 depletion on PMF progression, we utilized a newly developed global CreERT2-βarr2 flox conditional knockout mouse (28). This is an optimal model system, as it allowed us to create mice with PMF under conditions with normal βarr2 expression and subsequently observe effects of βarr2 depletion. First, we characterized βarr2 expression in marrow and spleen, both sites of hematopoiesis consistently affected in PMF. C57BL6/Jβarr2F/F-CreERT2+/– [Cre (+)] and C57BL6/Jβarr2F/F-CreERT2–/– [Cre (–)] mice were treated with tamoxifen for 5 consecutive days. At various time points after tamoxifen exposure, tissues were harvested and protein lysates were subjected to Western blot analysis. βarr1 expression in spleen was unchanged in tamoxifen-treated Cre (+) and Cre (–) mice, whereas βarr2 expression was significantly lower in tamoxifen-treated Cre (+) mice over time (P < 0.0001) (Supplemental Figure 5A). Findings were consistent in marrow (Supplemental Figure 5B). We observed a >75% reduction of βarr2 expression by day 10 in spleen and day 8 in marrow. These data demonstrate adequate knockdown of βarr2 only in Cre (+) mice and established a timeline for loss of βarr2 expression in this system. Additionally, we obtained complete blood counts for each mouse described above at death to investigate the effect of loss of βarr2 on hematopoiesis. Hemoglobin and WBCs were unchanged, although platelets were significantly lower in tamoxifen-treated Cre (+) mice at day 12 after tamoxifen exposure. This difference was transient, as by day +35 after tamoxifen exposure, there were no significant differences in platelet counts in Cre (+) versus Cre (–) tamoxifen-treated mice (Supplemental Figure 6).
Loss of βarr2 has an effect on hematopoietic cells independent of MPLW515L-mutant retrovirus. To investigate the effect of loss of βarr2 independent of PMF, we harvested donor cells from Cre (+) and Cre (–) donor mice and transplanted these cells in a 1:1 donor-to-recipient ratio into lethally irradiated WT recipient mice. Recipient mice were exposed to tamoxifen day 15–19 after transplant, and hematologic parameters and donor chimerism were monitored. There were no differences in hematologic parameters over time in mice that received Cre (+) versus Cre (–) donor cells, with the exception of a slight increase in WBCs in Cre (–) versus Cre (+) mice at day 58 after transplant (P < 0.05). Interestingly, donor chimerism was significantly decreased over time by about 15% in tamoxifen-treated mice that received Cre (+) donor cells independent of MPL-mutant retrovirus (Figure 4). This demonstrates that loss of βarr2 has some nonspecific effects on hematopoietic cells.
Loss of β-arrestin2 has effects on KLS cells independent of MPLW515L-mutant retrovirus. KLS cells were harvested from marrow of Cre (+) and Cre (–) donor mice and transplanted in a 1:1 ratio into lethally irradiated WT recipients. Mice were exposed to tamoxifen to induce loss of β-arrestin2 (βarr2) day 15–19 after transplant after engraftment of donor cells was confirmed. Hematologic parameters and donor chimerism were monitored. There was no change in hematologic parameters over time between Cre (+) and Cre (–) tamoxifen-treated mice, with the exception of a slight increase in WBCs at day 58 after transplant (P < 0.05). Cre (+) mice had significantly decreased donor chimerism at day 21, 28, and 58 after transplant versus Cre (–) mice (P < 0.01 for interaction, ***P < 0.001 day 21, *P < 0.05 day 28, ****P < 0.0001 day 58) by 2-way ANOVA. n = 5 for the entire figure.
Mice receiving Cre (+) versus Cre (–) donor cells had significantly different secondary outcomes. To analyze in vivo loss of βarr2 after PMF establishment, we utilized our transplant model and Cre (+) and Cre (–) donor mice. KLS cells were harvested, infected with MSCV-MPLW515L-GFP retrovirus, resorted for GFP positivity, and injected into lethally irradiated WT recipient mice. Presence of PMF was confirmed at day +14 after transplant, at which point mice that received Cre (+) or Cre (–) donor cells had equal βarr2 expression. Mice were exposed to tamoxifen days 15–19 after transplant and were monitored for survival and secondary endpoints (Supplemental Figure 7). To ensure adequate knockdown of βarr2 in our model system, we harvested spleens from mice 8 days after tamoxifen initiation, based on results shown in Supplemental Figure 5. Western blot analysis revealed almost complete loss of βarr2 expression in transplanted Cre (+) versus Cre (–) donor cells, indicating adequate knockdown of βarr2 in vivo (Figure 5A).
Outcome measures for mice with MPLW515L-mutant primary myelofibrosis receiving β-arrestin2 conditional knockout donor cells. A retroviral transduction system and cells from Cre (+) and Cre (–) mice were utilized to generate primary myelofibrosis (PMF). Mice received tamoxifen days 15–19 after transplant. (A) Representative Western blot of β-arrestin2 (βarr2) protein knockdown in flow-sorted GFP+ spleen cells 8 days after tamoxifen initiation. β-Arrestin1 (βarr1) expression was unchanged and βarr2 expression was lower in Cre (+) versus Cre (–) cells (1.38 ± 0.63 versus 52.3 ± 8.12, **P = 0.003, t test) (n = 3). (B) White blood cells (WBC) and platelets were higher at death in mice receiving Cre (–) cells versus pretamoxifen. Platelets were also higher at death in mice receiving Cre (–) versus Cre (+) cells. Hemoglobin was lower at death versus pretamoxifen in mice receiving Cre (+) or Cre (–) cells as well as at death in mice receiving Cre (+) versus Cre (–) cells. Donor chimerism was higher at death versus pretamoxifen in mice receiving Cre (–) cells as well as at death in mice receiving Cre (–) versus Cre (+) cells. One-way ANOVA was used for all analyses. **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001. (C) Tamoxifen-treated mice receiving Cre (+) cells had smaller spleen-to-body and liver-to-body ratios (****P < 0.0001, unpaired t test) versus Cre (–) controls. Cre (–), n = 34; Cre (+), n = 24. Red dots indicate mice with PMF. Gray dots represent mice without PMF.
We compared outcomes for 4 groups of mice to assess the effect of βarr2 depletion on established PMF: (a) Cre (+) donors, tamoxifen treated; (b) Cre (–) donors, tamoxifen treated; (c) Cre (+) donors, vehicle treated; and (d) Cre (–) donors, vehicle treated. Hematologic parameters and donor chimerism were reported at two important time points: prior to tamoxifen exposure (pretamoxifen) and at death. Hematologic parameters and donor chimerism were similar between mice receiving Cre (+) or Cre (–) cells before tamoxifen. WBCs were significantly higher at death versus pretamoxifen in tamoxifen-treated mice that received Cre (–) cells (129 K/μl versus 23.4 K/μl, P < 0.0001). In contrast, WBCs at death versus pretamoxifen were the same for mice that received Cre (+) cells. Similarly, platelets were higher at death in mice receiving Cre (–) cells versus pretamoxifen (1,026 K/μl versus 305.4 K/μl, P < 0.0001), with no difference noted in mice that received Cre (+) cells at the same time points. Platelets were lower at death in tamoxifen-treated mice that received Cre (+) versus Cre (–) cells (P < 0.01). Hemoglobin was lower at death in mice that received Cre (+) donor cells versus pretamoxifen (P < 0.0001) and versus mice at death that had received Cre (–) cells (P < 0.01). Interestingly, donor chimerism was higher at death in mice receiving Cre (–) cells versus pretamoxifen (P < 0.0001) as well as at death in mice receiving Cre (–) versus Cre (+) cells (P < 0.01) (Figure 5B). Spleen-to-body (P < 0.001) and liver-to-body (P < 0.001) ratios were notably smaller in tamoxifen-treated mice that received Cre (+) cells (Figure 5C). Collectively, these data indicate significant differences in outcome measures between tamoxifen-treated mice receiving Cre (+) versus Cre (–) donor cells. Interestingly, mice that received Cre (–) cells had more dramatic hematologic abnormalities compared with mice that received Cre (+) cells. When we examined survival among all mice, however, no differences were noted (Supplemental Figure 8).
Tamoxifen-treated mice that received Cre (+) cells had two disparate clinical courses. In experiments to establish conditional knockout of βarr2, we observed two disparate clinical courses among tamoxifen-treated mice that received Cre (+) cells: (a) PMF and (b) no PMF. This disparate course was consistently observed within our experimental animals and is depicted with red (PMF) versus gray (no PMF) dots in Figure 5B. Median survival for tamoxifen-treated mice that received Cre (+) cells without PMF was 31 days versus 60 days for tamoxifen-treated mice that received Cre (–) cells by log-rank Mantel-Cox testing (hazard ratio 0.48, 95% CI 0.15–0.88, P = 0.03). On histology, no mice had significant fibrosis by reticulin stain of marrow and spleen, consistent with lack of PMF (Figure 6A). Alternatively, median survival for tamoxifen-treated mice that received Cre (+) cells with PMF was significantly longer at 80 days versus 60 days in tamoxifen-treated mice that received Cre (–) cells by log-rank Mantel-Cox testing (hazard ratio 2.07, 95% CI 1.03–3.72, P = 0.04). All mice displayed marked fibrosis by reticulin stain consistent with PMF (Figure 6B). We also observed different secondary outcomes between these two groups. Tamoxifen-treated Cre (+) mice without PMF had lower WBCs, platelets, spleen and liver size, and donor chimerism at death versus Cre (+) mice with PMF (Supplemental Figure 9, A and B). Upon analysis of data described above, we determined that mice without PMF suffered loss of donor cells with resultant marrow aplasia. Given that these animals did not have PMF, we excluded them and analyzed only tamoxifen-treated mice receiving Cre (+) and Cre (–) cells with PMF.
Survival is improved in tamoxifen-treated conditional β-arrestin2–knockout mice with primary myelofibrosis. Tamoxifen-treated mice that received Cre (+) donor cells separated into two groups: (a) primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and (b) no PMF. (A) Median survival in mice without PMF was 31 days compared with 60 days for tamoxifen-treated mice that received Cre (–) cells by log-rank Mantel-Cox testing (*P = 0.03). Representative image (original magnification, ×40) of reticulin-stained femur from a mouse without PMF. There is minimal fibrosis. (B) Median survival in mice with PMF was longer at 80 days compared with 60 days for tamoxifen-treated mice that received Cre (–) cells by log-rank Mantel-Cox testing (*P = 0.04). Representative image (original magnification, ×40) of reticulin-stained femur from a mouse with PMF. Marked fibrosis (arrow) is present.
When we analyzed secondary outcomes in tamoxifen-treated mice that received Cre (+) and Cre (–) cells and had PMF, we observed several differences between measurements before tamoxifen treatment versus at death within each genotype of cells. However, there were no significant differences at death in mice that received Cre (+) versus Cre (–) cells (Supplemental Figure 10, A and B). These results indicate that tamoxifen-treated mice that received Cre (+) cells with PMF have an attenuated disease course with improved survival versus controls, although they experienced no alternations in secondary outcomes measures.
To assess in vivo apoptosis, we harvested KLS cells from Cre (+) and Cre (–) donor mice, infected them with MSCV-MPLW515L-GFP retrovirus, resorted for GFP positivity, and injected them into lethally irradiated WT recipient mice. Mice were treated with tamoxifen 15–19 days after transplant, and mice were euthanized on day 5 after initiation of tamoxifen based on the results shown in Supplemental Figure 5. Murine femurs were harvested, embedded in paraffin, and subjected to TUNEL staining. Tamoxifen-treated mice that received Cre (+) donor cells had more TUNEL+ cells in comparison to tamoxifen-treated mice that received Cre (–) donor cells, indicating increased apoptosis with tamoxifen exposure and loss of βarr2 in hematopoietic cells (Supplemental Figure 11). This is consistent with our in vitro data.
βarr2 expression is increased in human PMF. To determine if βarr2 expression is altered in human PMF, we examined marrow samples from patients with PMF versus normal marrow controls. Paraffin-embedded samples were stained with βarr2 primary antibody and expression was calculated and normalized by IgG and Hoechst staining. Notably, PMF samples had almost a 2-fold increase in βarr2 expression versus controls (P < 0.05) (Figure 7).
Human primary myelofibrosis samples have increased β-arrestin2 expression versus normal marrow controls. Primary human bone marrow samples from patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and normal bone marrow controls were stained for β-arrestin2 (βarr2) utilizing A2CT antibody. A second slide per sample was stained using nonimmune IgG control, and immunofluorescence was quantified. βarr2 expression was normalized to IgG background and DAPI staining. (A) Primary human PMF samples had increased βarr2 expression versus normal marrow controls (*P = 0.048 by t test). All images were quantified in triplicate. (B) Representative images of normal human bone marrow and PMF samples. Original magnification, ×20.
PMF is associated with debilitating constitutional symptoms and significant risk of transformation to acute leukemia. It is associated with driver mutations, including JAK2, calreticulin, and MPL. Therapies targeting the JAK/STAT pathway are effective, although not curative, in patients both with and without JAK2 mutations (29, 30). This indicates that other pathways are involved in disease pathogenesis and could be exploited for novel therapies. Fereshteh et al. first investigated the relationship between CML and βarr2 (12). Given that CML and PMF belong to the same family of diseases, we investigated the relationship between β-arrestins and PMF.
Mammalian cells express 4 subtypes of arrestins, with βarr1 and βarr2 being expressed ubiquitously throughout the body. Different cells have varying levels of β-arrestin expression and, accordingly, βarr1 and βarr2 serve different functions in different cells and disease-specific states. βarr2, specifically, has been implicated in the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma and breast and prostate cancer (31–34). In contrast to data from Fereshteh et al., Qin et al. demonstrated that βarr1 mediates CML progression due to effects on histone H4 acetylation (35). Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is another hematologic malignancy characterized by excess proliferation of immature lymphoid cells. Whereas Fereshteh et al. demonstrated decreased HSC self-renewal in βarr2-deficient CML cells, Shu et al. demonstrated that βarr1 regulates leukemia HSC self-renewal in ALL (36). These opposing findings are likely secondary to functional redundancy between arrestins. In our experiments, we show that βarr2 expression is increased in human PMF versus controls, suggesting potential involvement of βarr2 in disease pathogenesis. Using βarr1–/– and βarr2–/– mice, we also show that βarr2 is involved in the pathogenesis of PMF with no phenotypic involvement of βarr1.
Interestingly, as early as day 14 after transplant in our global knockout PMF mouse model, mice that received βarr2–/– cells had minimal donor chimerism, suggesting that altered long-term self-renewal is not the only mechanism of βarr2 involvement in PMF. In order to repopulate marrow, donor cells must home to marrow, engraft, proliferate, and self-renew. As stated above, several publications have shown that arrestins are implicated in chemotaxis and migration in various cell types (37–39). Through in vivo microscopy experiments, we demonstrated equitable homing of βarr2–/– versus WT and βarr1–/– cells, indicating that βarr2 is not required for proper homing of cells to marrow. [3H]thymidine and EdU incorporation assays to assess proliferation showed no differences in βarr2–/– versus control cells, demonstrating that βarr2 does not affect proliferation in physiologic and stressed conditions. Our lab has previously shown that βarr2 deficiency renders cells prone to apoptosis (26). Interestingly, βarr2–/– KLS cells had increased apoptosis when subjected to treatment with MPLW515L-mutant retrovirus, thus providing a mechanism for failed short-term engraftment of donor cells specifically in our disease model.
Although a defect in self-renewal capabilities of βarr2–/– KLS cells may certainly be contributing to failed engraftment, it is known that transplants utilizing βarr2–/– donor cells are successful. In a paper by Hollingsworth et al., for example, the authors transplanted βarr2–/– donor cells into WT recipients and WT cells into βarr2–/– mice. In both scenarios, high and equal engraftment of donor cells was achieved in recipient mice, demonstrating that it is possible to achieve long-term engraftment of βarr2–/– cells in a murine transplant model (40). However, these transplants were done with unmanipulated cells, as opposed to the cells used in our PMF model that are characterized by excessive cell proliferation and associated cellular stress. This again supports our conclusion that additional mechanisms, i.e., increased apoptosis with lack of antiapoptotic βarr2, are responsible for the lack of engraftment of βarr2–/– KLS cells, specifically in a MPLW515L-mutant model of disease.
Tools to regulate β-arrestin function in a time-dependent or controlled manner in vivo (small-molecule inhibitors, single-chain variable fragments, etc.) are lacking, making it difficult to assess the full potential of β-arrestins as therapeutic targets. Kotula et al. have effectively applied an aptamer chimera targeting βarr2 to CML cell lines and primary human samples, demonstrating that it is possible to effectively inhibit βarr2 in vitro (41). In this paper, our mouse model generated preliminary data supporting βarr2 as a therapeutic target in PMF and may provide impetus to invest efforts to develop tool compounds and ultimately therapeutic agents targeting βarr2. Perhaps more importantly, these tools and findings may be more broadly applicable to other malignancies.
In our conditional knockout model, all mice were phenotypically identical prior to tamoxifen exposure. Interestingly, in tamoxifen-treated mice that received Cre (+) donor cells, we observed two distinct clinical outcomes and identified a subgroup of tamoxifen-treated animals that did not have PMF. We hypothesize that variable knockdown of βarr2 across mice accounts for the divergent outcomes. Mice without PMF had more profound loss of βarr2, resulting in increased apoptosis with acute loss of donor cells and marrow failure. Cre (+) mice with PMF had increased donor chimerism over time compared with baseline, with significantly elevated WBCs, platelets, and hepatosplenomegaly at death. Although tamoxifen-treated mice that received Cre (+) cells had no significant differences in outcome measures at death compared with Cre (–) controls, these mice demonstrated improved survival. We hypothesize that some loss of βarr2, with resultant apoptosis of malignant cells, led to this notable survival advantage.
Based on our data demonstrating a 10%–15% loss of donor chimerism with tamoxifen treatment of mice that received Cre (+) donor cells independent of MPLW515L-mutant retrovirus, we can conclude that some loss of chimerism seen in our conditional knockout PMF mouse model is secondary to the nonspecific effect of acute loss of βarr2. Loss of donor chimerism is much more pronounced in the setting of MPLW515L-mutant retrovirus, thus supporting our conclusion that there are some disease-specific effects of loss of βarr2.
Our data establishes a relationship between βarr2 and PMF, indicates that βarr2 alters progression of disease, and demonstrates that antiapoptotic βarr2 mediates bone marrow failure of murine HSCs overexpressing MPLW515L. In many cancers, malignant cell growth is uninhibited, due to the ability of these cells to evade apoptosis. Therefore, β-arrestin and its’ involvement in regulating apoptosis is an attractive target in cancer. Additional studies both in mouse and in human PMF are warranted. Ultimately, βarr2 may serve as a therapeutic target in this morbid disease for which effective therapies are limited.
Mice. Mice were males, aged 8–12 weeks. WT (The Jackson Laboratory), βarr1–/– (generated in-house), and βarr2–/– (generated in-house) mice were on a C57BL/6J (CD45.2) background, and recipients were B6.SJL-PtprcaPepcb/BoyJ (B6SJL) (CD45.1) mice (The Jackson Laboratory). Conditional knockout mice, C57BL6/Jβarr2F/F-CreERT2+/– [Cre (+)] and C57BL6/Jβarr2F/F-CreERT2–/– [Cre (–)], were generated and littermate controls were utilized (28). Animals were maintained on antibiotic water for 2 weeks after transplant.
KLS (HSC) isolation and PMF generation for KLS transplants. Marrow cells were harvested from donor mouse femurs (42, 43). c-Kit+ cells were isolated using MACS microbeads and LS columns according to the manufacturer’s specifications (Miltenyi). C-kit+ cells were incubated with antibodies to c-Kit, Sca-1, CD3, CD4, CD8a, CD11b, B220, Ter119/erythroid cells, and Gr-1 (Biolegend) and were sorted for KLS markers (c-Kit+, Sca-1+, Lin–) by flow cytometry (FACSDiva, BD Biosciences). Cells were cultured with X-Vivo media (Lonza) supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 100 ng/ml stem cell factor, and 20 ng/ml thrombopoietin (R&D Systems). Cells were infected with MSCV-hMPLW515L-GFP and resorted for GFP positivity. Fifty thousand GFP+ cells and 8 × 105 support cells from recipients were injected retro-orbitally into lethally irradiated (900 cGy) congenic WT recipient mice. Mice were monitored daily for weight and signs of morbidity. Premorbid animals were euthanized and relevant data were collected. Blood was drawn weekly after transplantation. Complete blood counts were measured using a Hemavet counter (Drew Scientific), and number of recipient-origin (CD45.1) versus donor-derived cells (CD45.2) or donor chimerism was analyzed by flow cytometry using BD FACSCanto and FlowJo software (Treestar).
Whole marrow transplants. Marrow cells were harvested from donor WT, βarr1–/–, and βarr2–/– mouse femurs and red blood cells (RBCs) were lysed using RBC lysis buffer (eBiosciences). Cells were subsequently injected retro-orbitally into lethally irradiated (900 cGy) congenic WT recipient mice in a 1:1 donor-to-recipient ratio. Mice were monitored for weight and signs of morbidity. Secondary outcome measures, including complete blood counts and donor chimerism, were followed over time.
Study design and conditional knockout transplants. KLS cells were collected from Cre (+) or Cre (–) mice and were transplanted as described above. PMF presence was determined +14 days after transplant. Mice with WBCs of > 8 × 103/ml and >25% donor-derived cells (CD45.2) were included. In preliminary experiments, 95% of mice meeting these criteria developed PMF (data not shown). Mice received tamoxifen 75 mg/kg or corn oil vehicle (MilliporeSigma) by intraperitoneal injection day +15–19 after transplant. Animals were monitored for survival and secondary endpoints. Only male mice were utilized to ensure no confounding hormonal or immune effects of tamoxifen in females (44–46).
Proliferation assays. For both assays, KLS cells were harvested from WT, βarr1–/–, and βarr2–/– mice. DNA synthesis was measured using [3H]thymidine incorporation. Twenty-four and four hours prior to assay performance, [3H]thymidine (0.5 μCi/ml) was added to medium of each well (25,000/well). Cells were washed with PBS, and incorporation of [3H]thymidine into DNA strands was determined using a Tri-Carb 2800 liquid scintillation counter (Perkin-Elmer) and Lefko Fluor scintillation cocktail (RPI). To measure active DNA synthesis, cells were stained per manufacturer’s instructions with EdU (47) (Life Technologies). EdU+ cells were measured by flow cytometry. All experiments were performed in triplicate.
Apoptosis assays. KLS cells from WT, βarr1–/–, and βarr2–/– mice were harvested; cultured with MPLW515L-mutant retrovirus versus control; and were subjected to PacBlue annexin V (Biolegend) and propidium iodide (Thermo Fisher) staining. The percentage of positive cells was determined utilizing flow cytometry. Experiments were performed in triplicate. Apoptosis was also assessed by TUNEL assay (R&D Systems). Paraffin-embedded murine femurs were stained per the manufacturer’s instructions. Hoechst (1:500) (Invitrogen) was also applied to measure nucleus expression. Immunofluorescence was measured utilizing a Zeiss LSM510 laser-scanning microscope.
Colony-forming cell assays. KLS cells were harvested from marrow of WT, βarr1–/–, and βarr2–/– mice and were cultured with MPLW515L-mutant retrovirus versus control (MPLWT and no treatment). Ten thousand cells were plated with complete methylcellulose medium (Stem Cell Technologies), and colonies were counted 8–10 days after plating. Experiments were performed in triplicate.
Immunoblotting. Immunoblotting for βarr1 and βarr2 expression was performed (48). To assess extent and time required for induced loss of βarr2 expression, Cre (+) global βarr2 conditional knockout mice were treated with tamoxifen and tissues were harvested at various time points. Lysates were prepared from spleen and marrow. Cells were lysed in glycerol lysis buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Pierce BioTechnology). Lysates were rotated for 1 hour at 4 degrees to solubilize lysate, and insoluble material was separated by centrifugation. Protein concentration was measured using a BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher), and 20 μg of protein was loaded onto 10% Tris-glycine polyacrylamide gels (Life Technologies) with subsequent transfer to nitrocellulose membranes. βarr1 was detected using rabbit polyclonal A1CT antibody (1:2,000). βarr2 was detected using rabbit polyclonal A2CT antibody (1:1,000) (49). Secondary antibody with chemiluminescent detection was performed using SuperSignal West Pico Reagent (Thermo Fisher). Immunoblots were visualized and quantified using Bio Imaging System (Syngene). Levels of arrestin expression were normalized to β-actin (1:5,000) (MilliporeSigma).
KLS cell labeling. WT, βarr1–/–, and βarr2–/– KLS cells were isolated and labeled with lipophilic DiR fluorescent dye (Invitrogen). Cells were resuspended at a density of 2.5 × 106 cells/ml in complete culture media (RPMI-1640 + 10% FBS) and incubated with 25 μM DiR for 30 minutes at 37°C. After incubation, cells were washed in PBS, counted, and resuspended at desired concentrations for mouse engraftments as above (50). Dye labeling efficiency was tested via flow cytometry analysis using a FACSCanto II cytometer (BD Biosciences).
In vivo cell homing. B6.SJL-PtprcaPepcb/BoyJ mice were engrafted with fluorescently labeled WT, βarr1–/–, and βarr2–/– KLS cells and were prepared for in vivo imaging 20 hours after engraftment. Mice were anesthetized using isoflurane throughout the procedure and a rectangular scalp incision was made, revealing intact underlying cortical bone. Fluorescently labeled high-molecular-weight dextran (Dex-Cy5) was administered via tail vein to facilitate vasculature imaging. Mice were placed in a specially designed restrictor, and a cover slip covered exposed calvarial bone. High-resolution images were obtained through intact skull using a Leica SP5 confocal and multiphoton microscope with a ×20/0.40 NA objective lens. DiR and Dex-Cy5 imaging utilized a femtosecond Titanium:sapphire laser (Chameleon) and an Argon cs laser. Images were captured using Leica LAS-AF software using line and frame averaging. Calvarial marrow was subdivided into numbered anatomical areas, and overlapping ×20 images were captured of the entire region. After the procedure, images were merged to generate a montage, allowing total cell homing counts for each cell type to be determined.
Immunohistochemistry. Femurs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, decalcified, and embedded in paraffin. Cryostat sections were stained for H&E and for reticulin, and images were obtained using a Leica DM6 B light/fluorescence microscope.
Human sample imaging. Human marrow samples were obtained from the University of North Carolina School of Medicine Department of Pathology. One slide per sample was stained using A2CT (1:500) and Hoechst to measure nucleus expression (1:500) (Invitrogen). One slide per sample was stained using nonimmune mouse IgG and rabbit IgG (Santa Cruz). Immunofluorescence was measured utilizing a Zeiss LSM510 laser-scanning microscope. βarr2 and nucleus expression were quantified using Imaris 8.1 computer software. βarr2 expression was normalized to IgG control and Hoechst expression. Index number was calculated using the following: (A2CT signal from sample – A2CT signal from IgG control)/DAPI.
Statistics. Data were analyzed using standard tests, including 2-tailed Student’s t test and 1-way and 2-way ANOVA. All ANOVA analyses were done with post-test Bonferroni multiple comparisons. To detect 30%–40% difference in survival with 80% power at an α of 0.05 and with a hazard ratio of at least 2 using a 1-sided test, we estimated that 10 animals would be required per group per experiment. Sample size was monitored to ensure that excess studies were not performed. Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests were used to analyze survival. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. P values of less than 0.05 were considered significant.
Study approval. All animal studies were performed in accordance with recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Academies Press, 2011) from the NIH. The work was approved by the Duke IACUC (protocol A014-17-01). The protocol was also approved by the Institutional Biosafety and Recombinant DNA Committee (protocol 11-0033-0) at Duke University. Animals were bred and maintained in IACUC-approved facilities.
LAMR, JWW, JK, BT, LH, TP, HY, and MC performed experiments; LAMR, JWW, and JK designed the research; LAMR analyzed data and wrote the manuscript; YF provided samples and assisted with human samples research design; DS assisted with designing in vivo microscopy experiments; WC, JKLW, RTP, and RJL designed experiments and interpreted results; and RJL reviewed the manuscript and supervised the research project.
We thank R. Levine for providing the MPLW515L-mutant PMF viral constructs; D. Addison and Q. Lennon for administrative support; M. Cook for cell sorting; J. Snyder for assistance with quantification of human samples images; C. Ingersoll for animal breeding; L. Wingler for critical review of the manuscript; and N. Chao, S. Sarantopoulos and P. Doan for scientific discussion. This work was supported by NIH grants R01-HL016037-43 to RJL and T32 HL007057-38 to LAMR. RJL is an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. LAMR received support from the American Society of Hematology and the Duke Medicine Chair’s Research Award.
Address correspondence to: Robert J. Lefkowitz, Duke University Medical Center Box 3821, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. Phone: 919.684.2974; Email: lefko001@receptor-biol.duke.edu.
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Reference information: JCI Insight. 2017;2(23):e98094. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.98094.