Research ArticleCardiologyCell biology Free access | 10.1172/jci.insight.84969
1Nantong University School of Pharmacy, Nantong, China.
2Laboratory of Cardiovascular Science, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
3State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
4School of Life Sciences and Biopharmaceutics, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China.
5School of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
6Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences and
7Beijing City Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Address correspondence to: Rui-Ping Xiao or Yan Zhang, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China. Phone: 86.10.62757243; E-mail: xiaor@pku.edu.cn (R.P. Xiao). Phone: 86.10.62754557; E-mail: zhangyan9876@pku.edu.cn. (Y. Zhang).
Authorship note: Weizhong Zhu, Sharon Tsang, and David M. Browe contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Zhu, W. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Nantong University School of Pharmacy, Nantong, China.
2Laboratory of Cardiovascular Science, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
3State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
4School of Life Sciences and Biopharmaceutics, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China.
5School of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
6Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences and
7Beijing City Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Address correspondence to: Rui-Ping Xiao or Yan Zhang, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China. Phone: 86.10.62757243; E-mail: xiaor@pku.edu.cn (R.P. Xiao). Phone: 86.10.62754557; E-mail: zhangyan9876@pku.edu.cn. (Y. Zhang).
Authorship note: Weizhong Zhu, Sharon Tsang, and David M. Browe contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Tsang, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Nantong University School of Pharmacy, Nantong, China.
2Laboratory of Cardiovascular Science, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
3State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
4School of Life Sciences and Biopharmaceutics, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China.
5School of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
6Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences and
7Beijing City Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Address correspondence to: Rui-Ping Xiao or Yan Zhang, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China. Phone: 86.10.62757243; E-mail: xiaor@pku.edu.cn (R.P. Xiao). Phone: 86.10.62754557; E-mail: zhangyan9876@pku.edu.cn. (Y. Zhang).
Authorship note: Weizhong Zhu, Sharon Tsang, and David M. Browe contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Browe, D. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Nantong University School of Pharmacy, Nantong, China.
2Laboratory of Cardiovascular Science, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
3State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
4School of Life Sciences and Biopharmaceutics, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China.
5School of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
6Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences and
7Beijing City Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Address correspondence to: Rui-Ping Xiao or Yan Zhang, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China. Phone: 86.10.62757243; E-mail: xiaor@pku.edu.cn (R.P. Xiao). Phone: 86.10.62754557; E-mail: zhangyan9876@pku.edu.cn. (Y. Zhang).
Authorship note: Weizhong Zhu, Sharon Tsang, and David M. Browe contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Woo, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Nantong University School of Pharmacy, Nantong, China.
2Laboratory of Cardiovascular Science, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
3State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
4School of Life Sciences and Biopharmaceutics, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China.
5School of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
6Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences and
7Beijing City Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Address correspondence to: Rui-Ping Xiao or Yan Zhang, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China. Phone: 86.10.62757243; E-mail: xiaor@pku.edu.cn (R.P. Xiao). Phone: 86.10.62754557; E-mail: zhangyan9876@pku.edu.cn. (Y. Zhang).
Authorship note: Weizhong Zhu, Sharon Tsang, and David M. Browe contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Huang, Y. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Nantong University School of Pharmacy, Nantong, China.
2Laboratory of Cardiovascular Science, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
3State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
4School of Life Sciences and Biopharmaceutics, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China.
5School of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
6Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences and
7Beijing City Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Address correspondence to: Rui-Ping Xiao or Yan Zhang, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China. Phone: 86.10.62757243; E-mail: xiaor@pku.edu.cn (R.P. Xiao). Phone: 86.10.62754557; E-mail: zhangyan9876@pku.edu.cn. (Y. Zhang).
Authorship note: Weizhong Zhu, Sharon Tsang, and David M. Browe contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Xu, C. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Nantong University School of Pharmacy, Nantong, China.
2Laboratory of Cardiovascular Science, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
3State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
4School of Life Sciences and Biopharmaceutics, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China.
5School of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
6Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences and
7Beijing City Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Address correspondence to: Rui-Ping Xiao or Yan Zhang, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China. Phone: 86.10.62757243; E-mail: xiaor@pku.edu.cn (R.P. Xiao). Phone: 86.10.62754557; E-mail: zhangyan9876@pku.edu.cn. (Y. Zhang).
Authorship note: Weizhong Zhu, Sharon Tsang, and David M. Browe contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Liu, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Nantong University School of Pharmacy, Nantong, China.
2Laboratory of Cardiovascular Science, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
3State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
4School of Life Sciences and Biopharmaceutics, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China.
5School of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
6Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences and
7Beijing City Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Address correspondence to: Rui-Ping Xiao or Yan Zhang, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China. Phone: 86.10.62757243; E-mail: xiaor@pku.edu.cn (R.P. Xiao). Phone: 86.10.62754557; E-mail: zhangyan9876@pku.edu.cn. (Y. Zhang).
Authorship note: Weizhong Zhu, Sharon Tsang, and David M. Browe contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Lv, F. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Nantong University School of Pharmacy, Nantong, China.
2Laboratory of Cardiovascular Science, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
3State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
4School of Life Sciences and Biopharmaceutics, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China.
5School of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
6Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences and
7Beijing City Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Address correspondence to: Rui-Ping Xiao or Yan Zhang, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China. Phone: 86.10.62757243; E-mail: xiaor@pku.edu.cn (R.P. Xiao). Phone: 86.10.62754557; E-mail: zhangyan9876@pku.edu.cn. (Y. Zhang).
Authorship note: Weizhong Zhu, Sharon Tsang, and David M. Browe contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Zhang, Y. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Nantong University School of Pharmacy, Nantong, China.
2Laboratory of Cardiovascular Science, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
3State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
4School of Life Sciences and Biopharmaceutics, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China.
5School of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
6Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences and
7Beijing City Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Address correspondence to: Rui-Ping Xiao or Yan Zhang, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China. Phone: 86.10.62757243; E-mail: xiaor@pku.edu.cn (R.P. Xiao). Phone: 86.10.62754557; E-mail: zhangyan9876@pku.edu.cn. (Y. Zhang).
Authorship note: Weizhong Zhu, Sharon Tsang, and David M. Browe contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Xiao, R. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Authorship note: Weizhong Zhu, Sharon Tsang, and David M. Browe contributed equally to this work.
Published January 21, 2016 - More info
Stimulation of β1-adrenergic receptor (β1AR), a GPCR, and the receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE), a pattern recognition receptor (PRR), have been independently implicated in the pathogenesis of cardiomyopathy caused by various etiologies, including myocardial infarction, ischemia/reperfusion injury, and metabolic stress. Here, we show that the two distinctly different receptors, β1AR and RAGE, are mutually dependent in mediating myocardial injury and the sequelae of cardiomyopathy. Deficiency or inhibition of RAGE blocks β1AR- and RAGE-mediated myocardial cell death and maladaptive remodeling. Ablation or blockade of β1AR fully abolishes RAGE-induced detrimental effects. Mechanistically, RAGE and β1AR form a complex, which in turn activates Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII), resulting in loss of cardiomyocytes and myocardial remodeling. These results indicate that RAGE and β1AR not only physically crosstalk at the receptor level, but also functionally converge at the common mediator, CaMKII, highlighting a combined inhibition of RAGE and β1AR as a more effective therapy to treat diverse cardiovascular diseases, such as myocardial infarction, ischemia/reperfusion injury, and diabetic cardiovascular complications.
The adrenergic system comprising the sympathetic nervous system–catecholamine–β-adrenergic receptor (SNS-catecholamine-βAR) axis is broadly involved in stress response, energy homeostasis, and muscular actions. The SNS-catecholamine-βAR system is activated in response to physical or emotional stress such as “fight-or-flight” physiological response, which increases cardiac output several-fold within seconds. Under pathological conditions, ischemic or metabolic stress caused by a variety of etiologies also leads to sympathetic overdrive. The increased sympathetic stimulation results in increased cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels, initially producing positive inotropic and chronotropic effects, via the activation of the β1AR–Gs–adenylyl cyclase–cAMP–protein kinase A signaling cascade. However, persistent β1AR stimulation triggers loss of cardiomyocytes and maladaptive remodeling, including myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis, via mechanisms that depend on Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII), independently of protein kinase A (1, 2). For instance, myocardial infarction (MI) induced by ligation of the coronary artery leads to sympathetic hyperactivity, which, in turn, triggers myocardial injury and remodeling (3–5). These studies provide a rational basis for the clinical use of β-blockers in pathological cardiomyopathy, including ischemic cardiomyopathy and diabetic cardiomyopathy (6).
CaMKII, a multifunctional serine/threonine protein kinase (7), is activated canonically by complexing with Ca2+-calmodulin and noncanonically through posttranslational modifications, including phosphorylation, oxidation, and glycosylation in response to neurohormonal, inflammatory, or metabolic stress signals (8–11). Previous studies have shown that transgenic cardiac overexpression of CaMKII-δC is sufficient to induce dilated cardiomyopathy (12, 13), whereas transgenic expression of a mitochondria-targeted CaMKII inhibitor protects the heart against ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury (14), maladaptive postinfarct remodeling, and proinflammatory signaling (15). Moreover, activation of CaMKII is required for cardiomyocyte necrosis, as well as apoptosis induced by various ischemic and oxidative stress signals (1, 2). In particular, we and others have previously shown that excessive β1AR stimulation leads to cardiomyocyte death, maladaptive myocardial remodeling, and cardiomyopathy via activation of CaMKII (1, 16). Thus, CaMKII constitutes an important pathogenic factor and a potentially important therapeutic target for cardiomyopathy induced by multiple causes.
In addition to the β1AR-CaMKII signaling cascade, recent studies have placed the receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) at the center of pathways for ischemia- and I/R-induced myocardial injury and resultant cardiomyopathy (17). RAGE is a pattern recognition receptor (PRR) and inducibly expressed in various cell types, including cardiomyocytes (18, 19), monocytes (20), vascular endothelial cells (21), and vascular smooth muscle cells (22). RAGE is activated by multiple endogenous ligands, including advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) and high-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1). Both HMGB1 and AGEs can be passively leaked from necrotic or injured cells as endogenous “danger signals” or actively secreted by cells in response to ischemic, metabolic, or oxidative stress (15, 23, 24). Interaction of RAGE with these ligands leads to cellular innate immune responses, release of proinflammatory cytokines, generation of ROS, and upregulation of RAGE itself, resulting in a positive feed-forward cycle.
In the heart, RAGE signaling is markedly exaggerated in response to ischemic injury (17), as is the case in the liver and the brain (17, 25, 26). In particular, MI and I/R injury induce hyperglycemia, which predisposes the cardiovascular system to complications including oxidative stress (27), endothelial dysfunction (28, 29), and inflammation (30, 31), presumably by increasing blood levels of AGEs. As a result, acute hyperglycemia predicates a higher risk of in-hospital mortality in patients with MI in the presence or absence of diabetes (32). In contrast, tight glycemic control protects the heart against surgical injury–induced myocardial inflammation (33).
Previous studies have shown that RAGE signaling can be inhibited by an endogenous decoy, a soluble RAGE (sRAGE). Compared with full-length RAGE, sRAGE is a short variant form of RAGE lacking the transmembrane and cytoplasmic portions. sRAGE inhibits RAGE activation by competitively quenching its ligands (34, 35). Similar to the effect of gene ablation of RAGE, sRAGE markedly attenuates MI-induced cardiac inflammation, myocardial damage, and dysfunction (36). The protective effect of sRAGE further indicates that the RAGE-ligand axis plays an essential role in MI- and I/R-induced myocardial injury and cardiomyopathy.
Although RAGE and β1AR have been independently implicated in the pathogenesis of ischemia- and I/R-induced myocardial injury and cardiomyopathy, a relationship between the two receptors is yet to be established. In the present study, we have demonstrated a mutual dependence between β1AR and RAGE in mediating cardiomyopathy. Mechanistically, β1AR and RAGE form a protein complex, which, in turn, triggers cardiomyocyte death, myocardial remodeling, and heart failure via activating CaMKII.
β1AR-elicited cardiomyocyte death is RAGE dependent. It is well established that β1AR stimulation triggers cardiomyocyte death. In cultured adult rat cardiomyocytes, activation of β1AR with isoproterenol (ISO, 1 μM) in the presence of a β2AR selective antagonist ICI 118,551 (ICI, 0.1 μM) indeed induced robust cell death, as indexed by the increase of propidium iodide (PI)–positive cells. As expected, this effect was abolished by a β-blocker, propranolol (Prop, 0.1 μM) (Figure 1A). Importantly, sRAGE, a decoy of RAGE, also effectively abrogated ISO-induced cell death, although stimulation of RAGE with HMGB1 (200 ng/ml) could not further augment ISO-induced cell death (Figure 1B). This result suggests that β1AR-induced cardiomyocyte death is likely dependent on the activation of RAGE signaling.
β1AR stimulation elicits cardiomyocyte death via a RAGE-dependent mechanism. (A) ISO-induced increase in PI-positive cells was blocked by the βAR blocker Prop. (B) ISO-induced increase in PI-positive cells was abolished by a RAGE decoy, sRAGE. Adult rat cardiomyocytes were subjected to ISO (1 μM) plus a β2AR selective antagonist, ICI (0.1 μM), in the presence or absence of HMGB1 (200 ng/ml), Prop (0.1 μM), or sRAGE (14 ng/ml). Cell death was assessed by PI-positive staining. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM for 4 independent experiments (at least 500 cells from 4 rats for each group); **P < 0.01 versus all of the other groups (A) or versus control and ISO + sRAGE (B), 1-way ANOVA. β1AR, β1-adrenergic receptor; RAGE, receptor for advanced glycation end-products; ISO, isoproterenol; PI, propidium iodide; Prop, propranolol; ICI, ICI 118,551; sRAGE, soluble RAGE; HMGB1, high-mobility group box 1 protein.
Activation of β1AR is dependent on RAGE-induced cardiomyocyte death. HMGB1 serves as an agonist for RAGE, as well as the TLR. Here we found that HMGB1 (200 ng/ml) markedly increased cardiomyocyte death, which was fully abolished by sRAGE (14 ng/ml) (Figure 2A), indicating that, under the present experimental conditions, HMGB1 triggers cardiac cell death by activating RAGE. Notably, the effect of HMGB1 on cell death was blocked by β1AR selective antagonists, CGP20712A (CGP, 0.1 μM) and atenolol (0.1 μM), but not by a β2AR selective antagonist, ICI (0.3 μM), (Figure 2B). Furthermore, using β1AR-deficient mice and their WT littermates, we corroborated that β1AR ablation not only abolished ISO-, but also HMGB1-induced cardiac muscle cell death (Figure 2C).
RAGE stimulation with HMGB1 triggers cardiomyocyte death via a β1AR-dependent mechanism. (A) sRAGE abolished HMGB1-induced death of cultured adult rat cardiomyocytes. (B) HMGB1-induced myocyte death was abrogated by β1AR blockade with atenolol (0.3 μM) or CGP (0.3 μM), but not a β2AR blocker ICI (0.1 μM). In both panels, cultured adult rat cardiomyocytes were treated with HMGB1 (200 ng/ml) for 24 hours in the presence or absence of sRAGE or βAR blockers. (C) β1AR deficiency attenuated HMGB1- and ISO-induced death of adult mouse cardiomyocytes. Adult mouse cardiomyocytes were isolated from WT or β1AR KO mice. Cultured adult mouse cardiomyocytes were treated with HMGB1 (200 ng/ml) or ISO (1 μM) for 24 hours. Cell death was assayed by PI staining. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM for 4 independent experiments (at least 500 cells from 4 rats for each group). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; 1-way ANOVA. RAGE, receptor for advanced glycation end-products; HMGB1, high-mobility group box 1 protein; β1AR, β1-adrenergic receptor; sRAGE, soluble RAGE; CGP, CGP 20712A; ICI, ICI 118,551; ISO, isoproterenol; β1AR KO, β1-adrenergic receptor KO; PI, propidium iodide.
CaMKII is essential for both βAR- and RAGE-mediated cell death signaling. We and others have previously demonstrated that CaMKII is essentially involved in β1AR-induced death in adult mouse cardiomyocytes in vivo and in culture (1, 2). Inhibition of CaMKII activity with a synthetic blocker, KN93 (0.5 μM), or a peptide antagonist, AIP (5 μM), markedly attenuated ISO-induced cell death in cultured adult rat cardiomyocytes (Figure 3, A and B). It is noteworthy that these CaMKII inhibitors also fully abrogated HMGB1-induced myocyte death (Figure 3, C and D), suggesting that β1AR- and RAGE-mediated cell death signaling pathways are converged on the common mediator, CaMKII.
CaMKII is essentially involved in both βAR- and RAGE-evoked cell death signaling. (A and B) Inhibition of CaMKII with KN93 (A) or AIP (B) blocked ISO-induced death of adult rat cardiomyocytes. (C and D) HMGB1-induced death of cardiomyocytes was also abrogated by the CaMKII inhibitors KN93 (C) and AIP (D). Cultured myocytes were pretreated with either KN93 (0.5 μM) or AIP (5 μM) for 1 hour and then incubated with ISO (1 μM) or HMGB1 (100 ng/ml) for 24 hours. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM for 4 independent experiments (at least 500 cells from 4 rats for each group). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; 1-way ANOVA. CaMKII, Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase II; βAR, β-adrenergic receptor; RAGE, receptor for advanced glycation end-products; ISO, isoproterenol; HMGB1, high-mobility group box 1 protein.
RAGE-mediated CaMKII activation is β1AR dependent. Phospholamban (PLN), a Ca2+ handling protein at sarcoplasmic reticulum, is a well-established endogenous target of CaMKII that phosphorylates PLN at threonine 17 (Thr17). Using the phosphorylation level of Thr17-PLN, P-Thr17-PLN, as an index of CaMKII activity, we found that stimulation of RAGE with HMGB1 (200 ng/ml) elevated CaMKII activation in a time-dependent manner in cultured rat adult cardiomyocytes (Figure 4A). Pretreatment of cells with sRAGE (14 ng/ml) abolished HMGB1-induced activation of CaMKII. Importantly, the β1AR blocker CGP (0.1 μM), also fully abrogated HMGB1-evoked activation of CaMKII (Figure 4B). These results strongly suggest that RAGE-mediated CaMKII activation is β1AR dependent.
RAGE stimulation with HMGB1 activates CaMKII in a β1AR-dependent manner. (A) Time course of HMGB1-induced increase in CaMKII activity, as manifested by phosphorylation of its key target, PLN, at Thr17 (P-Thr17 PLN). Top and bottom show the representative and averaged data of Western blots of P-Thr17 PLN and total PLN. Cultured adult rat cardiomyocytes were incubated with HMGB1 (200 ng/ml) for different periods of time. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM from 3 experiments; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; 1-way ANOVA. (B) HMGB1-induced phosphorylation of the CaMKII target PLN was abolished by sRAGE and β1AR blockade with CGP, as well. Cells were pretreated with sRAGE (14 ng/ml) or CGP (0.3 μM) for 1 hour and then incubated with HMGB1 (200 ng/ml) for another 24 hours. Top and bottom show the representative and averaged data of Western blots of P-Thr17 PLN and total PLN, respectively. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM from 3 experiments. **P < 0.01; 1-way ANOVA. RAGE, receptor for advanced glycation end-products; HMGB1, high-mobility group box 1 protein; CaMKII, Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase II; sRAGE, soluble RAGE; PLN, phospholamban; CGP, CGP 20712A; Thr17, threonine 17; β1AR, β1-adrenergic receptor.
Inhibition of RAGE blocks β1AR-induced myocardial cell death and remodeling. To determine the potential pathological relevance of the mutual dependence of RAGE and β1AR in inducing cardiac cell death, we examined effects of in vivo inhibition of RAGE or β1AR using gene-targeted KO mouse models. ISO treatment (i.p., 30 mg/kg) markedly elevated blood troponin I level, an index of myocardial injury and myocyte necrosis, in WT mice (Figure 5A). Remarkably, ISO-induced increase in serum troponin I was not only reduced by deficiency of β1AR (β1AR KO) but also by ablation of RAGE (RAGE KO) (Figure 5A), highlighting the pathological relevance of the mutual dependence of β1AR and RAGE in mediating cardiac cell death and myocardial injury.
Inhibition of RAGE signaling with sRAGE or RAGE ablation blocks ISO-induced necrotic and apoptotic cell death. (A) Deletion of RAGE diminished acute ISO treatment induced myocardial necrotic cell death, indexed by increased serum troponin I levels. Mouse serum was collected after 24-hour treatment of ISO (30 mg/kg, i.p.). Serum tropinin I was measured by ELISA (Abace-Biology). The averaged data were expressed as mean ± SEM from 4 mice for each group. **P < 0.01 as indicated; 1-way ANOVA. (B) Schematic presentation showing the experimental protocol for chronic ISO infusion in the presence or absence of cotreatment with daily sRAGE injection. (C and D) Treatment of mice with sRAGE prevents chronic ISO treatment–induced myocardial apoptotic cell death assessed by TUNEL-positive staining. Representative TUNEL staining (C) and the averaged data (D). Data were expressed as mean ± SEM from 10 mice of 3 independent experiments. **P < 0.01 versus vehicle; Student’s t test. Mice were subjected to chronic ISO treatment (60 mg/kg/d by minipump) in the presence or absence of sRAGE (8 ng/kg/d i.p.) for 7 days and then sacrificed for myocardial TUNEL staining. Scale bar: 20 μm. RAGE, receptor for advanced glycation end-products; sRAGE, soluble RAGE; ISO, isoproterenol; β1AR KO, β1-adrenergic receptor KO.
To further translate our single cell data into whole animals, we examined cardiac structure and function in response to chronic ISO infusion (60 mg/kg/d with an osmotic minipump) in the presence or absence of RAGE blockage with sRAGE (8 ng/kg, i.p.) for 7 days (Figure 5B). ISO-induced cell death, assessed by the percentage of TUNEL-positive cells, was reduced by cotreatment of the mice with sRAGE (Figure 5, C and D). In addition, ISO infusion for 1 week led to profound myocardial fibrosis (Figure 6, A and B) and reduced cardiac contractility, as manifested by reduced ejection fraction and fractional shortening (Figure 6, C and D). sRAGE markedly ameliorated ISO-induced cardiac fibrosis and restored cardiac contractility (Figure 6). Thus, β1AR-induced myocardial cell death in vivo, remodeling, and heart failure are also dependent on the activation of RAGE signaling.
sRAGE inhibits ISO-induced myocardial fibrosis and contractile dysfunction. (A and B) The representative images (A) and averaged data (B) of cardiac fibrosis induced by ISO infusion in the presence or absence of sRAGE treatment. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM from 10 mice of 3 independent experiments; **P < 0.01; 1-way ANOVA. Scale bar: 50 μm. (C and D) sRAGE administration restored ISO-suppressed cardiac contractile function, as manifested by preserved ejection fraction (C) and fractional shortening (D). Mice were treated with ISO (60 mg/kg/d delivered by osmotic minipump) in the presence or absence of sRAGE (8 ng/kg/d, i.p.) for 7 days. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM from 10 mice of 3 independent experiments; **P < 0.01; 1-way ANOVA. sRAGE, soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products; ISO, isoproterenol.
Physical association of β1AR and RAGE. Coimmunoprecipitation assay revealed that β1AR and RAGE physically interacted with each other in HEK293 cells expressing HA-tagged β1AR and Flag-tagged RAGE, suggesting β1AR and RAGE may form a protein complex in intact cells (Figure 7A). Indeed, time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (TR-FRET) assay showed that coexpression of either HA-SNAP-β1AR (HS-β1AR) or Flag-SNAP-β1AR (FS-β1AR) with Flag-Clip-RAGE (FC-RAGE) displayed a much greater FRET intensity compared with that in cells expressing either β1AR or RAGE alone (Figure 7B), substantiating a physical interaction between the structurally distinct receptors. The enhanced FRET intensity was not caused by the levels of receptor density (Figure 7C). The present in vivo and in vitro data indicate that β1AR and RAGE functionally and physically interact with each other, resulting in their mutual dependence in mediating myocardial cell death and the sequelae of cardiomyopathy.
Dimerization of β1AR and RAGE in HEK293 cells coexpressing β1AR and RAGE. (A) Coimmunoprecipitation of β1AR with RAGE to indicate the interaction between these two receptors. HEK293 cells were transfected with either Flag-RAGE or HA-β1AR or both. Forty-eight hours after transfection, total cellular proteins were used for immunoprecipitation assay with anti-HA (for β1AR) (1:1,000) overnight. The precipitation was followed by Western blotting with anti-Flag (for RAGE) (1:1,000). The cellular lysate protein (30 µg) was used as a positive control for Flag-RAGE expression and anti-HA for loading control. The experiments were repeated 3 times. (B) FRET intensities in HEK293 cells’ coexpression of either HS-β1AR or FS-β1AR with FC-RAGE were expressed as the interaction of proteins between Snap and Clip. †P < 0.05 versus HS-β1AR or FC-RAGE; **P < 0.01 versus FS-β1AR or FC-RAGE; 1-way ANOVA. (C) Cell surface expression of β1AR and RAGE detected by Snap substrate (top panel) or Clip (bottom panel) fluorescence. **P < 0.05 versus Mock; 1-way ANOVA. The averaged data were expressed as mean ± SEM from 3 individual experiments with triplicates. β1AR, β1-adrenergic receptor; RAGE, receptor for advanced glycation end-products; HEK, human embryonic kidney; FRET, fluorescence resonance energy transfer; HS-β1AR, HA-SNAP-β1AR; FS-β1AR, Flag-SNAP-β1AR; FC-RAGE, Flag-Clip-RAGE; Tb, benzyl-guanines-Lumi4Tb; c.p.s., counts per second; Fluo, benzylcytosine-Fluorescein.
In the present study, there are three major discoveries. First, we have shown that RAGE-induced cardiac cell death is abolished by β1AR deficiency or blockade; β1AR-induced myocardial cell death and remodeling are abrogated by RAGE ablation or the endogenous RAGE decoy, sRAGE. Second, both β1AR- and RAGE-mediated cardiac detrimental effects depend on the activation of CaMKII, an important causal factor of cardiomyopathy and heart failure. Third, β1AR and RAGE physically interact with each other, forming a protein complex. These findings indicate that the two distinctly different receptors, β1AR (a prototypical member of GPCR family) and RAGE (a member of the PPR family), are mutually dependent in mediating myocardial cell death and cardiomyopathy, and perhaps other chronic stress–related diseases such as diabetes and cancer, as well.
It has been previously reported that membrane receptors can undergo homodimerization or heterodimerization, resulting in a highly diversified as well as integrated response to pathological perturbations or physiological signals. A close inspection reveals that the dimerization often occurs within the same class or closely related classes of receptors. For instance, we and others have previously reported that β2AR may exist as homodimers (37) or β1AR-β2AR heterodimers (38) to enhance signaling diversity and accuracy. The present study has, however, revealed a new mode of physical interaction between membrane receptors, i.e., dimerization or polymerization of receptors from two distinctly different families (a GPCR and a PRR). Specifically, using coimmuoprecipitation and FRET assays, we have provided physical evidence for the formation of a protein complex of β1AR and RAGE. Functionally, sRAGE blocks not only RAGE- but also β1AR-induced cardiomyocyte death; β1AR deficiency or blockade abolishes RAGE- and βAR-mediated cell death, underscoring the mutual dependence of β1AR and RAGE in triggering cardiac cell death and cardiomyopathy. These novel findings shed new light on receptor signaling theory.
Although they belong to different receptor families, both β1AR and RAGE are stress sensors and activated by neurohormonal and metabolic stress stimuli. During cardiac ischemic or metabolic stress, plasma catecholamines, including norepinephrine and epinephrine, are significantly increased (3–5), which further damages the myocardium. Equally important, cardiac stress is accompanied by acute hyperglycemia, which is closely associated with infarct area expansion, worsened cardiac function, and poor prognosis in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients with MI (21, 22, 39). Epidemiological studies have established a positive correlation between blood concentrations of RAGE ligands, AGEs and HMGB1, and heart failure (40–43), implying a causal relationship between RAGE signaling and myocardial damage. Indeed, AGEs and RAGE expression level are increased in isolated perfused hearts in response to I/R injury, whereas inhibition of RAGE signaling with sRAGE or gene ablation markedly ameliorates I/R-induced myocardial injury, regardless of the presence or absence of diabetes (17, 44). These studies suggest that exaggerated RAGE signaling contributes to the pathogenesis of cardiomyopathy and heart failure. Importantly, our present in vivo and in vitro data indicate that catecholamine-mediated cardiac injury is also RAGE dependent, unraveling a previously unappreciated mechanism underlying the beneficial effect of RAGE blockade. Ablation or blockade of β1AR fully abolishes RAGE-induced detrimental effects, revealing a novel beneficial effect of β-blocker therapy in the context of metabolic stress–related diseases.
Clinical studies have shown that the risk of cardiovascular diseases, including coronary heart disease (CHD), cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral vascular disease, are increased by 2- to 3-fold in patients with diabetes and that 80% of patients with diabetes die from cardiovascular complications, with CHD as the leading cause of death. β-Blocker therapy is a mainstay of the current treatment for CHD and MI (45, 46), and exhibits a greater beneficial effect in patients with diabetes (6, 47, 48). In line with the present findings, it has been shown that a long-term β-blocker therapy decreases serum levels of multiple RAGE-regulated inflammatory factors, including IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α, in patients with heart failure (49). These previous observations might be explained by the cross-talk and mutual dependence of RAGE and β1AR signaling. Since both β1AR and RAGE signaling pathways are overdriving in stressful cardiac conditions — such as MI and I/R injury — in the presence or absence of diabetes, inhibition of the hyperactivated RAGE signaling is expected to improve the structure and function of the failing or injured heart, similar to β-blocker therapy. Indeed, inhibition of RAGE with sRAGE exhibits therapeutic effects in multiple disease models with cardiac pathological conditions (50, 51). Equally appealing, β-blocker therapy may be used to treat RAGE-related diseases such as chronic inflammation, diabetes and its cardiovascular complications, and perhaps cancers, as well. This possibility awaits future investigation.
Mechanistically, we have identified CaMKII as a mediator that converges both RAGE- and β1AR-evoked inflammatory cell death (necrotic) signaling. Over the past two decades, it has been consistently documented that activation of CaMKII is required for β1AR-evoked myocardial apoptosis (1, 2, 16), hypertrophy (52), and cardiac remodeling (53). Apart from the receptor-mediated and Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent activation, CaMKII is activated by posttranslational modulations, including oxidation, glycosylation, and autophosphorylation, in response to ischemic or metabolic stress, contributing to those pathogenic stimuli–induced myocardial injury (9), inflammation (54), and remodeling (11). For instance, diabetic hyperglycemia causes cardiac arrhythmia by enhanced O-linked glycosylation of CaMKII (55), and increases post-MI mortality by elevated CaMKII oxidation (9, 56). On top of these previous studies, we have now demonstrated a function of CaMKII in converging RAGE- and β1AR-induced cardiac cell death signaling, providing a key mechanism synergizing sympathetic overdrive– and metabolic stress–induced tissue damage. Nevertheless, future study is required to determine what is the exact mechanism(s) underlying the functional cross-talk and, more specifically, whether and how β1AR and RAGE undergo heterodimerization in myocardium.
In summary, we have shown, for the first time to our knowledge, that RAGE and β1AR are mutually dependent in inducing cardiomyocyte death, maladaptive remodeling, and cardiomyopathy. Mechanistically, RAGE and β1AR form a protein complex that activates the common downstream signaling molecule CaMKII, resulting in myocardial cell death and remodeling in response to hormonal or metabolic stress, a situation often evoked by MI, I/R injury, pressure overload, or diabetes. Targeting RAGE as well as β1AR has far-reaching pathogenic and therapeutic implications.
Animals were maintained in the Center for Experimental Animals (an Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care–accredited experimental animal facility) at Peking University, Beijing, China. The animals were randomly allocated to experimental groups. Only male animals were used. No noninclusion or exclusion parameters were used in our studies. We did not blind investigators to treatments, but no subjective assessments were made.
Preparation of sRAGE. The construction of the expression vector for sRAGE (a truncated form of RAGE containing amino acid 23–340) has been described previously (57). The construct was used to establish the stable T7-tagged sRAGE CHO-K1 cell lines (catalog CCL-61, American Type Culture Collection [ATCC]). The culture medium containing sRAGE was collected. A Novagen T7 tag affinity purification kit was used to purify sRAGE, according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The concentration of purified sRAGE was determined using a RAGE ELISA kit (R&D Systems) against an in-house standard standardized in our previous study (57).
Isolation and culture of adult cardiomyocytes. Single cardiomyocytes were isolated from the hearts of 2- to 3-month-old male mice (C57BL/6) or rats (Sprague-Dawley). Enzymatic digestion, cell isolation, and culture were performed as described previously (58). Briefly, myocytes were plated at 0.5 to 1 × 104/cm2 with minimal essential medium containing 1.2 mM Ca2+/2.5% FBS/1% penicillin-streptomycin in culture dishes precoated with 10 μg/ml mouse laminin. Three hours after culture, the myocytes were treated with a β1AR antagonist (Prop, 1 μM) or sRAGE (14 ng/ml) for 1 hour before the addition of ISO (1 μM) or HMGB1 (100–200 ng/ml). End-point assays were performed 24 hours after ISO or HMGB1 treatment, unless otherwise indicated. All dishes were supplemented with ascorbic acid (100 μM, Sigma-Aldrich) to prevent the oxidation of ISO. β1AR KO mice were provided by Brian Kobilka at Stanford University (Stanford, California, USA) (38).
PI staining. Cell death was determined by PI staining. The stimulated cardiomyoytes were incubated with 10 μg/ml of PI for 15 minutes and visualized by fluorescence microscopy. The PI-positive and total cells were counted in at least 8 random fields. The extents of cell death were expressed in terms of percentages of PI-positive cells.
Isoproterenol-induced mouse heart failure. Heart failure model was established by s.c. injection of ISO (60 mg/kg/d, dissolved in saline, Sigma-Aldrich) with osmotic pump (ALZET) for 7 consecutive days. The control animals were given vehicle (saline containing 0.5 mM ascorbic acid) during the same period. M-mode echocardiograms were taken 7 days after ISO infusion. For sRAGE treatment, recombinant sRAGE was delivered by daily i.p. injection (8 ng/kg/d). The animals were randomly allocated to experimental groups. Only male mice (C57BL/6) at the age of 8–12 weeks were used. RAGE KO mice were provided by Angelika Bierhaus (German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany).
Coimmunoprecipation. HEK293 cells (catalog CRL-1573, ATCC) grown to 60% confluency in 60-mm cell culture dishes were transfected with 1 μg of Flag-RAGE plasmid (gift from Lin Li at Laboratory of Cardiovascular Science, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA). After 24 hours, cells were infected with adenovirus containing HA-β1AR. Another 24 hours later, cells were lysed with IP buffer (150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-Cl, 10 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1× protease inhibitor cocktail, pH 7.4). Cell lysates (200 μg) in 300 μl of reaction buffer were incubated with 0.5–1.0 μg of anti-Flag (Sigma-Aldrich, clone M2) antibody and 30 μl of Protein A/G PLUS Agarose beads overnight at 4°C. The beads were then washed 3 times with IP buffer. After the final wash, the beads were suspended in Laemmli buffer and the eluates were subjected to SDS-PAGE. Cell lysates (50 μg) were also loaded in separate lanes as input controls. Proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes by Western blotting and detected with anti-HA (Covance) and anti-Flag antibodies.
TR-FRET assay. HEK293 cells were transfected with plasmids containing SNAP-tagged or Clip-tagged receptors by electroporation and were plated in polyornithine-coated, black-walled, black-bottom, 96-well plates at 105 cells per well. Twenty-four hours after transfection, adherent cells were washed with culture medium and incubated with 100 μl per well of culture medium containing SNAP substrates (BG-Lumi4Tb, 0.3 μM) or Clip substrate (1 μM BC-Fluorescein), or SNAP substrates (BG-Lumi4Tb, 0.3 μM) plus Clip substrate (1 μM BC-Fluorescein), for 1 hour at 37°C. Cells were then washed 3 times with warm Tris-Krebs buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 118 mM NaCl, 1.2 mM KH2PO4, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 4.7 mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl2). After washing, the cells were incubated with Tris-Krebs buffer, and fluorescence and FRET were read using an Infinite F500 spectrofluorometer (Tecan). Fluorescence of Lumi4Tb (excitation at 340 nm, emission at 620 nm, 50-μs delay, 400-μs integration time, gain of 100) and BC-Fluorescein (excitation 485 nm, emission 520 nm, 0-μs delay, 1,000-μs integration time, gain of 50), and raw TR-FRET values (excitation at 340 nm, emission at 520 nm, 50-μs delay, 400-μs integration time, gain of 100) were measured. The experiments were repeated 3 times, and each assay condition was done in triplicate.
Materials. Unless otherwise indicated, all chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Anti-PLN and anti-phosphorylated PLN were purchased from PhosphoProtein Research (A010-14 and A010-13). Anti-HA was from Covance Research Products Inc. (MMS-101P). Anti-Flag was purchased Sigma-Aldrich (F7425). HMGB1 were purchased from R&D Systems (1690-HMB-050). Troponin I ELISA kit was purchased from Abace-Biology (DEIA6156). Reagents for the TR-FRET assay were manufactured by Cisbio Bioassays.
Statistics. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad PRISM version 5.01 (GraphPad Software Inc.) and the SPSS 18.0 software package (SPSS Inc.). Data sets were tested for normality of distribution with Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Data groups (2 groups) with normal distribution were compared using 2-sided unpaired Student’s t tests. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for nonparametric data. Comparisons between multiple groups were assessed by 1-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc analysis. The P values are presented in figure legends where a statistically significant difference was found: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. No statistical method was used to predetermine sample size.
Study approval. All procedures involving experimental animals were performed in accordance with protocols approved by the Committee for Animal Research of Peking University, Beijing, China, and conformed to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 8th ed. The National Academies Press. 2011.).
WZ, ST, and DMB are equally contributing first authors. WZ, ST, DMB, YH, CX, JFL, FL, and YZ conducted key experiments. WZ, AYHW, JFL, YZ, and RPX designed the study. WZ, AYHW, YZ, and RPX analyzed the data and wrote the manuscripts.
This project was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2013CB531200 to Y. Zhang, 2012CB518000 to R.P. Xiao, and 2012CB910402 to A.Y.H. Woo), The National Natural Science Foundation of China (81270190 to F. Lv, 81370345 to W. Zhu, 81130073 to R.P. Xiao, 81170100 to Y. Zhang, 81370234 to Y. Zhang, and 31221002 to R.P. Xiao), and National Science and Technology Major Projects for “Major New Drugs Innovation and Development” (2013ZX09508104 to R.P. Xiao, 2013ZX09507001 to Y. Zhang). We thank Edward G. Lakatta and Ling Li at the National Institute on Aging, NIH, USA, for providing reagents and insightful discussions.
Address correspondence to: Rui-Ping Xiao or Yan Zhang, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China. Phone: 86.10.62757243; E-mail: xiaor@pku.edu.cn (R.P. Xiao). Phone: 86.10.62754557; E-mail: zhangyan9876@pku.edu.cn. (Y. Zhang).
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Reference information: JCI Insight. 2016;1(1):e84969. doi:10.1172/jci.insight.84969.