Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Article has an altmetric score of 2

See more details

Posted by 2 X users
20 readers on Mendeley
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article (0)
Advertisement

Research ArticleHepatologyMetabolism Open Access | 10.1172/jci.insight.168476

miR-33 deletion in hepatocytes attenuates MASLD-MASH-HCC progression

Pablo Fernández-Tussy,1,2,3 Magdalena P. Cardelo,1,2,3 Hanming Zhang,1,2,3 Jonathan Sun,1,2,3,4 Nathan L. Price,1,2,3,5 Nabil E. Boutagy,1,6 Leigh Goedeke,7,8 Martí Cadena-Sandoval,9 Chrysovalantou E. Xirouchaki,10,11 Wendy Brown,12 Xiaoyong Yang,2,3,13 Oscar Pastor-Rojo,1,14,15 Rebecca A. Haeusler,9 Anton M. Bennett,3,6 Tony Tiganis,10,11 Yajaira Suárez,1,2,3,4 and Carlos Fernández-Hernando1,2,3,4

1Vascular Biology and Therapeutics Program,

2Department of Comparative Medicine,

3Yale Center for Molecular and System Metabolism, and

4Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

5Experimental Gerontology Section, Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

6Department of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

7Cardiovascular Research Institute and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine; and

8Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Institute and Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Bone Disease, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

9Department of Pathology & Cell Biology and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

10Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Surgery, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

13Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

14Servicio de Bioquímica Clínica, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.

15Departamento de Biología de Sistemas, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.

Address correspondence to: Carlos Fernández-Hernando, 10 Amistad Street, Room 437c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Phone: 203.737.4615; Email: carlos.fernandez@yale.edu. Or to: Pablo Fernández-Tussy, 10 Amistad Street, Room 420c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Email: pablo.fernandeztussy@yale.edu.

Find articles by Fernández-Tussy, P. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Vascular Biology and Therapeutics Program,

2Department of Comparative Medicine,

3Yale Center for Molecular and System Metabolism, and

4Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

5Experimental Gerontology Section, Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

6Department of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

7Cardiovascular Research Institute and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine; and

8Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Institute and Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Bone Disease, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

9Department of Pathology & Cell Biology and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

10Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Surgery, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

13Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

14Servicio de Bioquímica Clínica, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.

15Departamento de Biología de Sistemas, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.

Address correspondence to: Carlos Fernández-Hernando, 10 Amistad Street, Room 437c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Phone: 203.737.4615; Email: carlos.fernandez@yale.edu. Or to: Pablo Fernández-Tussy, 10 Amistad Street, Room 420c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Email: pablo.fernandeztussy@yale.edu.

Find articles by Cardelo, M. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Vascular Biology and Therapeutics Program,

2Department of Comparative Medicine,

3Yale Center for Molecular and System Metabolism, and

4Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

5Experimental Gerontology Section, Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

6Department of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

7Cardiovascular Research Institute and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine; and

8Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Institute and Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Bone Disease, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

9Department of Pathology & Cell Biology and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

10Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Surgery, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

13Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

14Servicio de Bioquímica Clínica, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.

15Departamento de Biología de Sistemas, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.

Address correspondence to: Carlos Fernández-Hernando, 10 Amistad Street, Room 437c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Phone: 203.737.4615; Email: carlos.fernandez@yale.edu. Or to: Pablo Fernández-Tussy, 10 Amistad Street, Room 420c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Email: pablo.fernandeztussy@yale.edu.

Find articles by Zhang, H. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Vascular Biology and Therapeutics Program,

2Department of Comparative Medicine,

3Yale Center for Molecular and System Metabolism, and

4Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

5Experimental Gerontology Section, Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

6Department of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

7Cardiovascular Research Institute and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine; and

8Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Institute and Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Bone Disease, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

9Department of Pathology & Cell Biology and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

10Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Surgery, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

13Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

14Servicio de Bioquímica Clínica, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.

15Departamento de Biología de Sistemas, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.

Address correspondence to: Carlos Fernández-Hernando, 10 Amistad Street, Room 437c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Phone: 203.737.4615; Email: carlos.fernandez@yale.edu. Or to: Pablo Fernández-Tussy, 10 Amistad Street, Room 420c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Email: pablo.fernandeztussy@yale.edu.

Find articles by Sun, J. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Vascular Biology and Therapeutics Program,

2Department of Comparative Medicine,

3Yale Center for Molecular and System Metabolism, and

4Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

5Experimental Gerontology Section, Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

6Department of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

7Cardiovascular Research Institute and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine; and

8Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Institute and Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Bone Disease, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

9Department of Pathology & Cell Biology and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

10Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Surgery, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

13Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

14Servicio de Bioquímica Clínica, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.

15Departamento de Biología de Sistemas, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.

Address correspondence to: Carlos Fernández-Hernando, 10 Amistad Street, Room 437c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Phone: 203.737.4615; Email: carlos.fernandez@yale.edu. Or to: Pablo Fernández-Tussy, 10 Amistad Street, Room 420c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Email: pablo.fernandeztussy@yale.edu.

Find articles by Price, N. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Vascular Biology and Therapeutics Program,

2Department of Comparative Medicine,

3Yale Center for Molecular and System Metabolism, and

4Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

5Experimental Gerontology Section, Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

6Department of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

7Cardiovascular Research Institute and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine; and

8Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Institute and Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Bone Disease, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

9Department of Pathology & Cell Biology and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

10Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Surgery, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

13Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

14Servicio de Bioquímica Clínica, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.

15Departamento de Biología de Sistemas, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.

Address correspondence to: Carlos Fernández-Hernando, 10 Amistad Street, Room 437c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Phone: 203.737.4615; Email: carlos.fernandez@yale.edu. Or to: Pablo Fernández-Tussy, 10 Amistad Street, Room 420c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Email: pablo.fernandeztussy@yale.edu.

Find articles by Boutagy, N. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Vascular Biology and Therapeutics Program,

2Department of Comparative Medicine,

3Yale Center for Molecular and System Metabolism, and

4Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

5Experimental Gerontology Section, Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

6Department of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

7Cardiovascular Research Institute and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine; and

8Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Institute and Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Bone Disease, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

9Department of Pathology & Cell Biology and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

10Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Surgery, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

13Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

14Servicio de Bioquímica Clínica, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.

15Departamento de Biología de Sistemas, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.

Address correspondence to: Carlos Fernández-Hernando, 10 Amistad Street, Room 437c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Phone: 203.737.4615; Email: carlos.fernandez@yale.edu. Or to: Pablo Fernández-Tussy, 10 Amistad Street, Room 420c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Email: pablo.fernandeztussy@yale.edu.

Find articles by Goedeke, L. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Vascular Biology and Therapeutics Program,

2Department of Comparative Medicine,

3Yale Center for Molecular and System Metabolism, and

4Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

5Experimental Gerontology Section, Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

6Department of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

7Cardiovascular Research Institute and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine; and

8Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Institute and Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Bone Disease, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

9Department of Pathology & Cell Biology and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

10Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Surgery, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

13Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

14Servicio de Bioquímica Clínica, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.

15Departamento de Biología de Sistemas, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.

Address correspondence to: Carlos Fernández-Hernando, 10 Amistad Street, Room 437c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Phone: 203.737.4615; Email: carlos.fernandez@yale.edu. Or to: Pablo Fernández-Tussy, 10 Amistad Street, Room 420c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Email: pablo.fernandeztussy@yale.edu.

Find articles by Cadena-Sandoval, M. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Vascular Biology and Therapeutics Program,

2Department of Comparative Medicine,

3Yale Center for Molecular and System Metabolism, and

4Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

5Experimental Gerontology Section, Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

6Department of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

7Cardiovascular Research Institute and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine; and

8Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Institute and Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Bone Disease, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

9Department of Pathology & Cell Biology and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

10Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Surgery, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

13Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

14Servicio de Bioquímica Clínica, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.

15Departamento de Biología de Sistemas, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.

Address correspondence to: Carlos Fernández-Hernando, 10 Amistad Street, Room 437c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Phone: 203.737.4615; Email: carlos.fernandez@yale.edu. Or to: Pablo Fernández-Tussy, 10 Amistad Street, Room 420c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Email: pablo.fernandeztussy@yale.edu.

Find articles by Xirouchaki, C. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Vascular Biology and Therapeutics Program,

2Department of Comparative Medicine,

3Yale Center for Molecular and System Metabolism, and

4Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

5Experimental Gerontology Section, Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

6Department of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

7Cardiovascular Research Institute and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine; and

8Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Institute and Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Bone Disease, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

9Department of Pathology & Cell Biology and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

10Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Surgery, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

13Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

14Servicio de Bioquímica Clínica, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.

15Departamento de Biología de Sistemas, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.

Address correspondence to: Carlos Fernández-Hernando, 10 Amistad Street, Room 437c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Phone: 203.737.4615; Email: carlos.fernandez@yale.edu. Or to: Pablo Fernández-Tussy, 10 Amistad Street, Room 420c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Email: pablo.fernandeztussy@yale.edu.

Find articles by Brown, W. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Vascular Biology and Therapeutics Program,

2Department of Comparative Medicine,

3Yale Center for Molecular and System Metabolism, and

4Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

5Experimental Gerontology Section, Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

6Department of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

7Cardiovascular Research Institute and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine; and

8Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Institute and Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Bone Disease, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

9Department of Pathology & Cell Biology and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

10Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Surgery, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

13Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

14Servicio de Bioquímica Clínica, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.

15Departamento de Biología de Sistemas, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.

Address correspondence to: Carlos Fernández-Hernando, 10 Amistad Street, Room 437c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Phone: 203.737.4615; Email: carlos.fernandez@yale.edu. Or to: Pablo Fernández-Tussy, 10 Amistad Street, Room 420c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Email: pablo.fernandeztussy@yale.edu.

Find articles by Yang, X. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Vascular Biology and Therapeutics Program,

2Department of Comparative Medicine,

3Yale Center for Molecular and System Metabolism, and

4Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

5Experimental Gerontology Section, Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

6Department of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

7Cardiovascular Research Institute and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine; and

8Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Institute and Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Bone Disease, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

9Department of Pathology & Cell Biology and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

10Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Surgery, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

13Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

14Servicio de Bioquímica Clínica, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.

15Departamento de Biología de Sistemas, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.

Address correspondence to: Carlos Fernández-Hernando, 10 Amistad Street, Room 437c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Phone: 203.737.4615; Email: carlos.fernandez@yale.edu. Or to: Pablo Fernández-Tussy, 10 Amistad Street, Room 420c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Email: pablo.fernandeztussy@yale.edu.

Find articles by Pastor-Rojo, O. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Vascular Biology and Therapeutics Program,

2Department of Comparative Medicine,

3Yale Center for Molecular and System Metabolism, and

4Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

5Experimental Gerontology Section, Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

6Department of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

7Cardiovascular Research Institute and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine; and

8Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Institute and Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Bone Disease, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

9Department of Pathology & Cell Biology and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

10Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Surgery, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

13Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

14Servicio de Bioquímica Clínica, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.

15Departamento de Biología de Sistemas, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.

Address correspondence to: Carlos Fernández-Hernando, 10 Amistad Street, Room 437c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Phone: 203.737.4615; Email: carlos.fernandez@yale.edu. Or to: Pablo Fernández-Tussy, 10 Amistad Street, Room 420c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Email: pablo.fernandeztussy@yale.edu.

Find articles by Haeusler, R. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Vascular Biology and Therapeutics Program,

2Department of Comparative Medicine,

3Yale Center for Molecular and System Metabolism, and

4Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

5Experimental Gerontology Section, Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

6Department of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

7Cardiovascular Research Institute and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine; and

8Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Institute and Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Bone Disease, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

9Department of Pathology & Cell Biology and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

10Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Surgery, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

13Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

14Servicio de Bioquímica Clínica, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.

15Departamento de Biología de Sistemas, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.

Address correspondence to: Carlos Fernández-Hernando, 10 Amistad Street, Room 437c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Phone: 203.737.4615; Email: carlos.fernandez@yale.edu. Or to: Pablo Fernández-Tussy, 10 Amistad Street, Room 420c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Email: pablo.fernandeztussy@yale.edu.

Find articles by Bennett, A. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Vascular Biology and Therapeutics Program,

2Department of Comparative Medicine,

3Yale Center for Molecular and System Metabolism, and

4Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

5Experimental Gerontology Section, Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

6Department of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

7Cardiovascular Research Institute and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine; and

8Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Institute and Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Bone Disease, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

9Department of Pathology & Cell Biology and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

10Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Surgery, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

13Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

14Servicio de Bioquímica Clínica, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.

15Departamento de Biología de Sistemas, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.

Address correspondence to: Carlos Fernández-Hernando, 10 Amistad Street, Room 437c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Phone: 203.737.4615; Email: carlos.fernandez@yale.edu. Or to: Pablo Fernández-Tussy, 10 Amistad Street, Room 420c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Email: pablo.fernandeztussy@yale.edu.

Find articles by Tiganis, T. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Vascular Biology and Therapeutics Program,

2Department of Comparative Medicine,

3Yale Center for Molecular and System Metabolism, and

4Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

5Experimental Gerontology Section, Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

6Department of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

7Cardiovascular Research Institute and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine; and

8Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Institute and Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Bone Disease, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

9Department of Pathology & Cell Biology and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

10Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Surgery, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

13Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

14Servicio de Bioquímica Clínica, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.

15Departamento de Biología de Sistemas, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.

Address correspondence to: Carlos Fernández-Hernando, 10 Amistad Street, Room 437c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Phone: 203.737.4615; Email: carlos.fernandez@yale.edu. Or to: Pablo Fernández-Tussy, 10 Amistad Street, Room 420c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Email: pablo.fernandeztussy@yale.edu.

Find articles by Suárez, Y. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Vascular Biology and Therapeutics Program,

2Department of Comparative Medicine,

3Yale Center for Molecular and System Metabolism, and

4Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

5Experimental Gerontology Section, Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

6Department of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

7Cardiovascular Research Institute and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine; and

8Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Institute and Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Bone Disease, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

9Department of Pathology & Cell Biology and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

10Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

11Department of Surgery, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

13Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

14Servicio de Bioquímica Clínica, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.

15Departamento de Biología de Sistemas, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.

Address correspondence to: Carlos Fernández-Hernando, 10 Amistad Street, Room 437c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Phone: 203.737.4615; Email: carlos.fernandez@yale.edu. Or to: Pablo Fernández-Tussy, 10 Amistad Street, Room 420c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Email: pablo.fernandeztussy@yale.edu.

Find articles by Fernández-Hernando, C. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

Published August 27, 2024 - More info

Published in Volume 9, Issue 19 on October 8, 2024
JCI Insight. 2024;9(19):e168476. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.168476.
© 2024 Fernández-Tussy et al. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Published August 27, 2024 - Version history
Received: January 4, 2023; Accepted: August 21, 2024
View PDF
Abstract

The complexity of the mechanisms underlying metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) progression remains a significant challenge for the development of effective therapeutics. miRNAs have shown great promise as regulators of biological processes and as therapeutic targets for complex diseases. Here, we study the role of hepatic miR-33, an important regulator of lipid metabolism, during the progression of MASLD and the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We report that miR-33 was elevated in the livers of humans and mice with MASLD and that its deletion in hepatocytes (miR-33 HKO) improved multiple aspects of the disease, including steatosis and inflammation, limiting the progression to metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic hepatitis (MASH), fibrosis, and HCC. Mechanistically, hepatic miR-33 deletion reduced lipid synthesis and promoted mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation, reducing lipid burden. Additionally, absence of miR-33 altered the expression of several known miR-33 target genes involved in metabolism and resulted in improved mitochondrial function and reduced oxidative stress. The reduction in lipid accumulation and liver injury resulted in decreased YAP/TAZ pathway activation, which may be involved in the reduced HCC progression in HKO livers. Together, these results suggest suppressing hepatic miR-33 may be an effective therapeutic approach to temper the development of MASLD, MASH, and HCC in obesity.

Introduction

Metabolic dysfunction–associated liver disease (MASLD) stands as the most common chronic liver disease worldwide, affecting around 25% of the global population (1–8). Ranging from metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver (MASL) to metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic hepatitis (MASH), MASLD can progress to severe fibrosis or cirrhosis, ultimately leading to end-stage liver disease or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (9, 10). The rapid rise in MASLD/MASH prevalence mirrors the increase in obesity and diabetes, making MASH the fastest growing cause of HCC globally, especially in Western populations (3, 9–12). While the primary driver of hepatic steatosis is fat accumulation in the liver, the progression of MASL to MASH is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including genetics, inflammation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial malfunction, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, lipotoxicity, insulin resistance, and gut dysbiosis (3, 13, 14).

Despite the global health and economic burden associated with MASLD/MASH, approved therapies are still lacking. Therefore, there is a pressing need to identify potential therapeutic options to halt the progression of the disease and its rapid growth (15, 16). Several studies have associated MASLD with multiple metabolic alterations (9, 17–19), and impaired mitochondrial function is one of the most prominent observed in MASLD. Mitochondria are integral organelles for oxidative energy production, a process that encompasses numerous pathways including fatty acid β-oxidation (FAO), tricarboxylic acid cycle, electron transport chain (ETC), and adenosine triphosphate generation. Mitochondrial dysfunction can vary depending on the stage of MASLD, but in advanced disease it frequently includes alterations in mitochondrial number, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), mitochondrial biogenesis, mitochondrial dynamics, and mitochondrial recycling (18, 20–26). Coordinated regulation of these processes is essential to enhance mitochondrial activity without producing detrimental effects associated with excess mitochondrially derived reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation and redox imbalance. Conversely, targeting de novo lipogenesis (DNL) has also arisen as a therapeutic option to mitigate MASLD pathogenesis (27–30).

miRNAs have shown great promise as potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of metabolic disease, due to their ability to target numerous mRNAs and pathways simultaneously (31, 32). Previous research from our group and others identified miR-33 as an intronic miRNA hosted within the sterol regulatory element-binding protein 2 (SREBF2) gene (33–35). miR-33 plays a pivotal role in metabolism through the regulation of mRNA transcripts involved in a wide variety of metabolic processes, including lipid and glucose metabolism (33–40). Notably, miR-33 coordinates the expression of genes associated with mitochondrial function and homeostasis (37, 41), and increased miR-33 levels in the liver (42) and serum (43) have been associated with MASLD in humans.

Here, we elucidate a role of hepatocyte miR-33 in regulating obesity-driven MASL-MASH-HCC progression. Genetic ablation of miR-33 in hepatocytes improves metabolic function in the liver, enhancing glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity and attenuating dyslipidemia, steatosis, and MASH. These improvements contribute to long-term reductions in liver injury and the development HCC. Mechanistically, we found that hepatocyte deletion of miR-33 increases mitochondrial FAO and alters mitochondrial dynamics, correlating with increased expression of miR-33 target genes, such as carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A (CPT1α), PPARG coactivator 1 alpha (PGC1α), and AMPKα. miR-33 regulation of AMPKα contributes to the regulation of a subset of downstream targets and pathways, which have been recently implicated in MASH progression (44–49). Additionally, attenuation of lipid and cholesterol accumulation in the liver reduces hepatic injury, protecting from MASLD-induced HCC development in the long term. Overall, this work indicates that the deletion of miR-33 in hepatocytes is sufficient to regulate several pathways altered throughout the development of MASL/MASH/HCC, impeding the progression of the disease.

Results

Loss of hepatic miR-33 improves glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, and dyslipidemia during obesity-driven MASLD. To study the specific role of hepatic miR-33 in MASL and its progression to MASH and HCC, we employed the conditional miR-33–knockout murine model (miR-33loxP/loxP) bred with an Albumin-Cre to induce the deletion of miR-33 in hepatocytes (HKO) (50). WT and HKO littermates were then fed a choline-deficient, high-fat diet (CD-HFD) for 3, 6, and 15 months to induce simple steatosis/MASL, steatohepatitis/MASH, and HCC, respectively (Supplemental Figure 1A; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.168476DS1), as previously described (51).

To investigate the role of hepatic miR-33 in systemic metabolism and liver function during MASLD progression, we analyzed miR-33 levels after 3 and 6 months on a CD-HFD. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis of freshly isolated hepatocytes confirmed miR-33 deletion in HKO mice, while revealing increased miR-33 levels in diet-induced MASL and MASH in control mice (Figure 1A). These findings align with recent studies showing enhanced SREBP2 (the host gene of miR-33a) transcriptional activation in humans and other mouse models of MASL (52). We further verified this observation by measuring SREBP2 and SREBP1 and miR-33a/b levels in core liver biopsies from obese nonsteatotic (BMI 36–61, MAFLD activity score [MAS] = 0), obese steatotic (BMI 36–61, MAS = 1–2), and obese MASH (BMI 36–61; MAS > 5, fibrosis score = 1–2) patients. The results showed that both SREBP1 and SREBP2, as well as their intronic miRNAs (miR-33b and miR-33a, respectively), were elevated in obese steatosis and obese MASH individuals compared with obese healthy individuals (Supplemental Figure 1 and Figure 1B). In agreement with the coordinated expression of SREBPs and miR-33a/b isoforms, a positive correlation was observed in their expression levels in the livers of those patients (Supplemental Figure 1C). As fatty liver and CD-HFD–induced MASLD models have been associated with metabolic dysfunctions such as obesity, dyslipidemia, and insulin resistance, we first sought to determine whether miR-33 deficiency in hepatocytes influenced obesity-driven MASLD progression (51). To this end, we analyzed the development of obesity, dyslipidemia, and insulin resistance in WT and HKO mice after 3 and 6 months on a CD-HFD. While no changes in body weight were observed (Figure 1C), the slight decrease in body fat accumulation in HKO mice (Figure 1D) was gradually attenuated over time, indicating no relevant changes in body weight or fat accumulation in our model. Circulating lipids, including total cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol, were also reduced in HKO mice in MASL and MASH while no changes were observed in circulating triglycerides (TAGs) (Figure 1, E–H). Finally, we assessed the regulation of glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity in WT and HKO mice by glucose tolerance test and insulin tolerance test (GTT and ITT). We found that HKO mice showed improved glucose metabolism after both 3 and 6 months on a CD-HFD (Figure 1, I–L). These results are consistent with our previous study showing improved systemic metabolism in HKO mice and reinforces the metabolic benefit of depleting miR-33 in hepatocytes, independent of the underlying dietary factors driving fatty liver progression (50).

Hepatic miR-33 deficiency improves systemic metabolism in MASL/MASH.Figure 1

Hepatic miR-33 deficiency improves systemic metabolism in MASL/MASH. (A) qPCR analysis of miR-33 expression in WT and HKO hepatocytes fed a control diet and CD-HFD for 3 (MASL) and 6 months (MASH) (n = 3). (B) qPCR analysis of miR-33a and miR-33b expression in livers from healthy, MASL, and MASH human patients (n = 8). (C and D) Body weight (C) and body composition (D) analysis of WT and HKO mice during MASL/MASH time course (n = 18 WT and 16 HKO). (E–G) Levels of total cholesterol (E), HDL-C (F), and TAGs (G) in plasma of WT and HKO mice (n = 8 WT and 8 HKO chow; 6 WT and 6 HKO; MASL; 6 WT and 6 HKO MASH). (H) Cholesterol content of fast protein liquid chromatography–fractionated lipoproteins from pooled plasma of 6 WT and 6 HKO mice fed a CD-HFD for 3 (MASL) and 6 months (MASH). (I–L) GTT (n = 13, MASL; n = 12 WT and 11 HKO MASH) (I and K) and ITT (n = 8; n = 12 WT and 11 HKO MASH) (J and L) in WT and HKO mice with areas under the curve. Data represent the mean ± SEM. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, ###P < 0.001 comparing WT and HKO compared with WT animals, 2-way ANOVA followed by multiple comparison (A, B, and D–G) and unpaired 2-sided Student’s t test for 2-group comparisons (I–L).

Genetic ablation of miR-33 in hepatocytes reduces liver steatosis by enhancing FAO and decreasing fatty acid synthesis. Excess hepatic lipid accumulation results from the dysregulation of one or more pathways leading to an imbalance among lipid uptake, synthesis, and oxidation (9). Our results showed a reduction in steatosis after feeding mice a CD-HFD for 3 and 6 months, which was verified by histological analysis, including H&E and Oil Red O staining (Figure 2, A and B). Additionally, liver/body weight ratio and TAG content in the livers were also reduced in HKO mice (Figure 2, C and D). miR-33 is an important posttranscriptional regulator of numerous genes that participate in FAO (36, 53); thus, we first sought to determine if the regulation of FAO was occurring in our model of MASLD. Ex vivo analysis of the rate of [14C]-palmitate oxidation showed increased liver FAO in HKO mice (Figure 3A). We further characterized the contribution of miR-33 to mitochondrial metabolism by measuring the respiratory capacity of freshly isolated hepatocytes from CD-HFD fed WT and HKO mice, verifying the increase in mitochondrial respiration in hepatocytes lacking miR-33 (Figure 3, B and C). Mechanistically, we observed that carnitine O-octanoyltransferase (CROT) and the mitochondrial FA transporter, CPT1α, both bona fide targets of miR-33 and key molecules that participate in FAO, were significantly upregulated in HKO livers (Figure 3D and Supplemental Figure 2D).

miR-33 deficiency in hepatocytes reduces liver steatosis through regulationFigure 2

miR-33 deficiency in hepatocytes reduces liver steatosis through regulation of FA synthesis and FAO. (A) Representative images of H&E- and Oil Red O–stained livers from WT and HKO mice and (B) quantification of ORO staining (n = 3 WT and 3 HKO chow; 6 WT and 6 HKO; MASL; 7 WT and 6 HKO MASH). Liver weight (n = 3 WT and 3 HKO chow; 6 WT and 6 HKO; MASL; 7 WT and 6 HKO MASH) (C) and liver TAG (n = 7 WT and 7 HKO chow; 6 WT and 6 HKO MASL; 7 WT and 6 HKO MASH (D) in WT and HKO mice fed with a chow diet or CD-HFD. Data represent the mean ± SEM. *P ≤ 0.05, ***P ≤ 0.001 compared with WT animals, 2-way ANOVA followed by multiple comparison. FA, fatty acid.

miR-33 deficiency in hepatocytes increases FAO synthesis and decreases FA sFigure 3

miR-33 deficiency in hepatocytes increases FAO synthesis and decreases FA synthesis. (A) Ex vivo analysis of FAO in WT and HKO livers (n = 5 WT and 4 HKO chow; 6 WT and 6 HKO; MASL; 6 WT and 6 HKO MASH). (B and C) Mitochondrial respiratory analysis inferred from oxygen consumption rate measurements of primary mouse hepatocytes isolated from WT and miR-33 HKO livers (n = 4 WT and 3 HKO MASL; 5 WT and 5 HKO MASH). (D) Western blot and densitometric analysis of CROT, CPT1α, phosphorylated acetyl-CoA carboxylase (p-ACC) (Ser79), total ACC, p-AMPKα (T172), total AMPKα, and housekeeping standard VINCULIN in WT and HKO livers. Data represent the mean ± SEM. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001 compared with WT animals, unpaired 2-sided Student’s t test for 2-group (B) comparisons and 2-way ANOVA followed by multiple comparison (A and D). CPM, counts per million.

Next, we aimed to determine whether hepatocyte miR-33 deficiency influenced DNL during MASLD progression. To this end, we assessed the activities of fatty acid synthase (FASN) (the enzyme involved in the synthesis of FAs from acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA) and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl–CoA reductase (HMGCR) (the rate-limiting enzyme for cholesterol synthesis) in freshly isolated liver homogenates from WT and HKO mice. The results showed decreased activity of both enzymes in HKO livers (Supplemental Figure 2, A and B). Additionally, ex vivo measurement of DNL was assessed in WT and HKO livers, verifying a decreased rate of acetate incorporation into lipids in HKO livers after CD-HFD feeding (Supplemental Figure 2C). Consistently, we observed that HKO livers had increased Ser79 phosphorylation of acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) (Figure 3D and Supplemental Figure 2D). The increased hepatic FAO and suppression of DNL observed in HKO mice correlated with a significant increase in AMPKα activation (as assessed by phosphorylation) (Figure 3D and Supplemental Figure 2D). In contrast, the expression and phosphorylation of AMPKβ were not altered (Supplemental Figure 2D). Thus, the attenuation of MASLD progression mediated by miR-33 deletion in hepatocytes is through the regulation of multiple metabolic pathways.

Given the profound metabolic alterations observed in miR-33 HKO livers, we next assessed global transcriptional changes by RNA-Seq analysis in the livers of WT and HKO MASL mice, aiming to identify specific genes or upstream regulators involved in these functions. We found 1,082 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (421 upregulated and 661 downregulated in HKO, adjusted P [Padj.] < 0.05), indicating the broad effect that miR-33 deficiency has in the liver during steatosis initiation. Interestingly, genes involved in metabolic functions and pathways altered in obesity-driven MASLD revealed that gene signatures associated with FA uptake, FA synthesis, and cholesterol homeostasis were altered in HKO livers (Figure 4, A and B). Of interest was the upregulation of ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 1 (Abca1) and cytochrome P450 family 7 subfamily A member 1 (Cyp7a1) observed in HKO livers, given their participation in cholesterol and bile acid (BA) metabolism and their direct regulation by miR-33 (33, 54). Thus, we sought to determine whether hepatocyte deletion of miR-33 was playing a role in cholesterol and BA metabolism in the liver. ABCA1 and CYP7A1 upregulation in MASLD HKO livers was verified by Western blot analysis (Supplemental Figure 3A). Moreover, RNA-Seq analysis also revealed upregulation of other genes related to BA metabolism, including Abcb11, Cyp27a1, Abcg8, Abcg5, Atp11c, and Atp8b1 (Figure 4B). Given the observed regulation of BA metabolic genes in our model, we measured BA profiles in livers from WT and HKO mice fed a chow diet or a CD-HFD. In mice fed a CD, differences were found only in the levels of cholic acid, with no other differences observed for other BA species or total BA content (Supplemental Figure 3B). By contrast, when mice were fed the CD-HFD, a more profound dysregulation of the hepatic BA profile was observed. Total BAs were increased in WT mice but maintained at standard basal levels in HKO livers (Supplemental Figure 3B). Additionally, deoxycholic acid (DCA), one of the most toxic BAs, was reduced in HKO livers compared with WT livers fed the CD-HFD (Supplemental Figure 3B). Analysis of different species related to liver pathologies, including 12αOH/NON-12αOH, unconjugated/conjugated, and secondary/primary ratios, revealed different trends in the relative amounts of these BAs in WT livers under CD-HFD feeding but not in HKO livers (Figure 4C and Supplemental Figure 3C), correlating with insulin resistance and liver injury (55–60). Finally, we further interrogated our RNA-Seq data for changes in well-known specific processes associated with MASLD progression, including inflammatory, pro-fibrogenic, and CYP450-associated functions (61, 62). We observed downregulation of genes associated with inflammation and fibrogenesis in HKO livers, while repression of CYP expression was prevented (Figure 4D). To gain better insight into the direct impact of miR-33 on liver gene expression signature, we sought to identify potential genes directly targeted by miR-33 in the liver in healthy and MASLD conditions. To do this, we assessed the overlap between genes upregulated in HKO livers from chow diet (50) and CD-HFD mice and the top 2,000 genes predicted to be miR-33 targets by TargetScan7.2. While only 6 genes, including Abca1, Ski, and Atp11c, were found in the intersection of all 3 conditions, more overlapping of genes (133 genes) was found in the intersection between miR-33 targets and those upregulated in HKO under MASLD than in CD-fed mice (Figure 4E and Supplemental Table 1). These findings highlight the potential direct role of several miR-33 targets, including genes known to regulate metabolism and liver injury, such as Abca1, Ski, Atp11c, Slc25a51, Atp8b1, Atp11a, Slc30a1, Irs2, Acadsb, Serpind1, Klf15, and Edem1, in the progression of the disease. Moreover, these results suggest that most of the observed changes in the HKO mice are not a consequence of basal gene regulation mediated by miR-33 deletion but are a consequence of changes that occur during the progression of the disease. Overall, our analysis suggests miR-33 HKO mice are protected from MASLD progression through the regulation of metabolic function at multiple levels, resulting in increased FAO and mitochondrial function and decreased DNL and cholesterol metabolism.

RNA-Seq in MASL livers reveals global changes in gene expression regulatedFigure 4

RNA-Seq in MASL livers reveals global changes in gene expression regulated by miR-33. (A, B, and D) Heatmaps of pathways relevant to MASLD progression in livers from WT and HKO mice. Cutoff values were settled as fold-change > log21.5 and Padj < 0.05. (n = 4.) (C) Comparison of liver BAs and BA distribution of the 12α-hydroxy/non–12α-hydroxy ratio in WT and HKO livers. (n = 4–5.) (E) Venn diagram depicting the overlap between miR-33 predicted targets and genes upregulated in HKO livers versus WT livers in mice fed a chow diet and CD-HFD. Data represent the mean ± SEM (*P ≤ 0.05 compared with WT animals, unpaired 2-sided Student’s t test for 2-group comparisons and 2-way ANOVA followed by multiple comparison).

miR-33 HKO mice are protected from diet-induced MASH and fibrosis. The adverse outcomes associated with MASH and the subsequent fibrosis encompass the progression to cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease or HCC (9). Based on the improved metabolic function and the beneficial changes in the gene expression profile in HKO livers, we examined how miR-33 deletion specifically affects the development of liver fibrosis during MASH. Sirius red staining of liver sections revealed a strong decrease in collagen content in HKO livers (Figure 5A). Moreover, histopathological analysis of H&E-stained liver sections from Figure 2A revealed decreased macrovesicular fat content and hepatocyte ballooning in HKO livers (Figure 5B). Consistently, we observed a significant reduction in liver fibrosis markers, including fibronectin (FN1) and collagen type I alpha 1 chain (COL1A1), as well as total hydroxyproline content in HKO mice (Figure 5, C and D). Attenuation of liver fibrosis in the absence of hepatic miR-33 was not accompanied by significant reduction in liver inflammation (Supplemental Figure 4, A–E). Reduction in liver injury in mice lacking miR-33 in hepatocytes was also verified by reduced serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (Figure 5E). Together, our findings suggest that miR-33 deficiency in hepatocytes protects CD-HFD–fed mice from diet-induced liver injury and progression to fibrosis.

Loss of hepatic miR-33 attenuates liver fibrosis and MASH.Figure 5

Loss of hepatic miR-33 attenuates liver fibrosis and MASH. (A) Representative images of Sirius red–stained livers from WT and HKO mice. Indicated quantification on the right (n = 3 chow; 7 WT and 6 HKO MASH). (B) Graphical quantification of macrovesicular fat and hepatocyte ballooning from WT and HKO livers normalized per high-magnification field area (HMF) (n = 7 WT and 6 HKO). (C) Western blot and densitometric analysis of FN1, COL1A1, and housekeeping standard VINCULIN in WT and HKO livers. (D) Hydroxyproline content in MASH WT and HKO livers (n = 3 chow; 7 MASH). (E) Serum ALT in WT and HKO mice (n = 3 chow; 6 MASH). Data represent the mean ± SEM (*P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001 compared with WT animals, unpaired 2-sided Student’s t test for 2-group comparisons and 2-way ANOVA followed by multiple comparison).

Loss of miR-33 regulates miR-33 target genes exclusively in hepatocytes and triggers metabolic changes and cellular cross-communication in the liver. In order to understand the potential regulatory effects of miR-33 regulation in the different cell populations in the liver during the advanced stages of the disease, we performed single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-Seq) in WT and HKO livers with MASH (Figure 6, A–C). UMAP analysis of liver cells showed that most evident changes between WT and HKO cells were found in the population identified as hepatocytes (Figure 6C). Unbiased analysis of changes within hepatocytes identified downregulation of pathways related to obesity, protein translation, and unfolded protein response in HKO hepatocytes, while pathways related to EIF2 signaling, inhibition of activin, and activation of RXR were upregulated in these cells (Figure 6, D and E). Additionally, analysis of hepatocytes verified the alterations in metabolic and fibrogenic genes, as well as miR-33 bona fide target genes (Figure 6, F–I). Moreover, we analyzed different cell populations and interactions involved in liver fibrosis, aiming to understand how miR-33 deletion in hepatocytes could affect other cells. To monitor for hepatic stellate cell (HSC) activation, the genetic profile of HSCs was analyzed based on different characteristics known to contribute to their activation and liver fibrosis (63). HSCs were classified and named according to their activated phenotype and pro- or antifibrogenic function as follows: activated myofibroblast HSC (Myo) (pro-fibrogenic), cytokine-producing HSC (Cy&Gr) (antifibrogenic), classically activated (Activ) (pro-fibrogenic), quiescent (Quies) (antifibrogenic), and apoptotic HSC (Death) (antifibrogenic) (63). Myo and Activ markers were increased in WT HSCs, whereas markers of Cy&Gr, Quies, and Death of HSC were higher in HSCs derived from HKO livers, indicating reduced activation of HSCs in this group (Figure 7A). On the other hand, although antiinflammatory markers of macrophages showed a trend toward increased activation in HKO livers, analysis of inflammatory markers aligned with our previous data showing no clear regulation in HKO livers (Figure 7B). Finally, we analyzed different cell types from our scRNA-Seq looking for potential changes in miR-33 target genes that could suggest an existing communication between different cell types and an indirect gene regulation from hepatocyte-derived miR-33. With that purpose, bona fide targets of miR-33 (Abca1, Crot, and Cpt1a) were analyzed in different cell types, including HSCs, endostellate cells, macrophages, and cholangiocytes. While downregulation of some of those genes were observed in some of the groups, the clear lack of upregulation of these bona fide miR-33 target genes in the HKO group suggests no direct effect of miR-33 deletion in these cells when miR-33 was removed from the hepatocytes (Figure 7, C–F). We also performed cell-cell communication analysis to get an overall picture of the different interactions occurring in WT and HKO livers. Cell-cell communication analysis showed increased total number and strength of cell-cell communication in WT livers compared with HKO livers (Supplemental Figure 5, A–C), with hepatocytes being the main cell type contributing to cell communication in the liver (Supplemental Figure 5C). Cell-cell communication analysis also revealed that the most relevant differences in WT versus HKO livers were found in pathways related to leukocyte activation and markers of liver fibrosis mostly derived from the hepatocytes (Supplemental Figure 5, D and E). By contrast, signals upregulated in HKO livers were more heterogeneous, including signals related to HSC senescence and death and quiescence — chemerin (64, 65), BMPs (66–68), and CALCR (69); signals classically associated with liver fibrosis (TGF-β and PDGF); and signals linked to hepatocyte regeneration and death prevention — TWEAK (70) and NOTCH (Supplemental Figure 5, D and E). Finally, we attempted to analyze specific ligand-receptor differences in WT versus HKO cell-cell communication from hepatocytes to other liver cells; however, no differences in terms of signaling were found. Taken together, our results indicate that the main effect produced by miR-33 deletion in hepatocytes is specific to these cells and the effects observed in recruitment and activation of inflammatory and hepatic stellate cells are a consequence of changes produced initially in hepatocytes.

Hepatic loss of miR-33 attenuates liver injury through the crosstalk of difFigure 6

Hepatic loss of miR-33 attenuates liver injury through the crosstalk of different cell types. Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) (A) and heatmap (B) representation of cell clusters identified from scRNA-Seq analysis. (C) UMAP of single-cell profiles from WT (gray) and HKO (red) mouse hepatocytes identified from scRNA-Seq analysis. (D) Canonical pathways represented by z score among differentially expressed genes in scRNA-Seq analysis of hepatocytes from WT and HKO mice. Red bars indicate pathways in which genes are upregulated in HKO, and gray indicates downregulated pathways on the predicted z score. All represented pathways were significantly changed with a –log P > 1.5. (E–I) Violin plots representing the top upregulated and downregulated genes significantly altered in the indicated pathways in hepatocytes. Violin plot data display single-cell distribution of the indicated experimental groups. Orig.Ident, original identity.

miR-33 deficiency attenuates liver fibrosis without regulating miR-33 targeFigure 7

miR-33 deficiency attenuates liver fibrosis without regulating miR-33 target genes in nonhepatocyte liver cells. (A and B) Heatmap showing HSC activation (A) and macrophage inflammatory/noninflammatory markers (B) identified from scRNA-Seq from WT and HKO mice livers. Color codes referred to z score. (C–F) Violin plots showing expression changes of miR-33 target genes in nonhepatocyte cells, including HSCs (C), endostellate cells (D), macrophages (E), and cholangiocytes (F). Violin plot data display single-cell distribution of the indicated experimental groups. ***Padj < 0.001 using default statistical test (Wilcox test) from Seurat package in R studio.

miR-33 deficiency in hepatocytes prevents mitochondrial dysfunction associated with MASLD-MASH progression. Mitochondrial dysfunction is a common feature underlying MASLD-MASH progression (18, 20–26). miR-33 acts as a critical regulator of mitochondrial function through the targeting of multiple factors, including PGC1α and AMPKα (40, 41, 71). Thus, we next aimed to further characterize the molecular mechanisms that mediate the improved mitochondrial function observed in miR-33–deficient hepatocytes. We found increased mitochondrial content in hepatocytes from HKO MASH livers, as assessed by the protein levels of different complexes of the ETC and by the mitochondrial to nuclear DNA ratio (mtDNA/nDNA) (Figure 8, A and B). These findings were further supported by electron microscopy analysis of hepatocytes from MASH mice, which revealed an increase in the coverage and density of mitochondria, as well as mitochondrial elongation in HKO mice (Figure 8, D–H). We also observed enhanced mitochondrial ETC activity of complex I and complex II (Figure 8C). The increase in mitochondrial mass found in hepatocytes from HKO mice was correlated with elevated levels of PGC1α, which is a direct target of miR-33 (72, 73). Moreover, PGC1α’s downstream target, mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM), was also upregulated in livers from miR-33–deficient hepatocytes (Figure 8I). Together, these results demonstrate that absence of miR-33 in hepatocytes improves mitochondrial function by increasing mitochondrial mass and ETC activity.

Hepatic miR-33 deficiency improves mitochondrial function and homeostasis.Figure 8

Hepatic miR-33 deficiency improves mitochondrial function and homeostasis. (A) Western blot and densitometric analysis of different mitochondrial subunits blotted with the Total OXPHOS Rodent WB Antibody Cocktail (Abcam ab110413) and housekeeping standard VINCULIN in WT and HKO livers from mice fed with CD-HFD for 6 months (n = 6). (B) qPCR analysis of mitochondrial DNA and nuclear DNA in WT and HKO livers. Data represented as mtDNA/nDNA (n = 6). (C) Activity of the ETC complex I and complex II in MASH livers. Enzyme activities are expressed as change in absorbance/min/μg protein/citrate synthase activity (n = 4–6). (D) Representative electron micrographs of mitochondria profiles in WT and HKO hepatocytes from MASH livers. (E–H) Mitochondrial coverage (E), mitochondrial density (F), cumulative distribution and mean of mitochondrial area (G), and mitochondria aspect ratio (H) from WT and HKO hepatocytes (n = 3–4). (I) Western blot of PGC1α, TFAM, MFN2, OPA1, and housekeeping standard VINCULIN or GAPDH in WT and HKO livers. Data represent the mean ± SEM. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001 compared with WT animals, unpaired 2-sided Student’s t test for 2-group comparisons and 2-way ANOVA followed by multiple comparison (B, C, and I).

Mitochondrial homeostasis is critical for the control of mitochondrial health and metabolism (18, 24, 74). Mitochondrial quality control mechanisms include mitochondrial biogenesis and dynamics, a process that involves fusion and fission of mitochondrial membranes and is dysregulated in MASLD. Mitochondrial number and size are also controlled through the balance of mitochondrial dynamics (22, 24, 74, 75). Thus, we sought to characterize mitochondrial dynamics in our MASH model. We found an increase in fusion-related proteins MFN2 and OPA1 but no relevant changes in fission proteins (Figure 8I and Supplemental Figure 6A). Importantly, the increased MFN2 level is consistent with the changes in mitochondrial shape observed by electron microscopy and correlates with the increased respiratory capacity of these mice.

Lipid overload and excessive mitochondrial activity have been linked with mitochondrial dysfunction in MASLD. Besides the inability to sustain metabolic needs, mitochondrial dysfunction is responsible for the production of large amounts of ROS, which increases mitochondrial damage and can eventually lead to cell death (76). Although the increased mitochondrial number and activity in HKO mice could lead to higher ROS production and damage, changes in mitochondrial dynamics can also play a role in ROS regulation, membrane potential, and other downstream processes related to mitochondrial stress (24, 74). To determine whether miR-33 levels in hepatocytes influence ROS production in obesity-driven MASLD/MASH, we monitored ROS accumulation in liver sections by dihydroethidium (DHE) and observed a decrease in HKO mice (Figure 9A). Liver lipid peroxidation measured by assessing malondialdehyde (MDA) as a readout of ROS damage also showed a similar decrease in livers from HKO mice (Figure 9B). Although no major changes were found in the oxidized or reduced forms of glutathione, or their ratio (Supplemental Figure 6B), an increase in glutathione-reductase (GSGG) activity was found in HKO livers, suggesting that changes in the recycling rather than the synthesis of glutathione may contribute to reduced oxidative stress in these livers (Figure 9C). Finally, oxidative stress markers including 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE), and OxyBlot, verified increased levels of oxidative stress in WT livers during MASH (Figure 9, D and E). Considering the close link among mitochondrial dynamics, lipid overload, and ER stress, we interrogated HKO MASH livers for changes in ER stress response. However, only partial regulation of ATF4 and protein kinase R-like ER kinase was found in those livers, indicating a limited involvement of miR-33 in the regulation of ER stress (Supplemental Figure 6C). Last, the ultimate cellular consequence of mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress, the induction of cell death, was also attenuated in the HKO mice under MASH conditions, as seen by caspase-3/6 activity and TUNEL staining (Supplemental Figure 6, D–G). Notably, analysis of gene expression changes related to decreased hepatocyte cell death and increased mitochondrial function were also observed in HKO hepatocytes identified from scRNA-Seq (Supplemental Figure 6H). Together, these findings indicate that miR-33 deficiency in hepatocytes improves mitochondrial quality control by enhancing mitochondrial biogenesis and mitochondrial dynamics to sustain high rates of oxidative metabolism without increasing mitochondrial injury and oxidative stress during lipid overload, thereby protecting against hepatocyte cell death. The activation of mitochondrial biogenesis and dynamics in miR-33–deficient hepatocytes through upregulation of PGC1α and AMPKα is in line with previous studies identifying these 2 genes as direct targets of miR-33.

miR-33 HKO mice have reduced oxidative stress and cell death in MASH liversFigure 9

miR-33 HKO mice have reduced oxidative stress and cell death in MASH livers. (A) Representative DHE staining and quantification in WT and HKO livers from mice fed with CD-HFD for 6 months (n = 6 WT and 6 HKO). (B) Lipid peroxidation measured by MDA assay (Invitrogen) in MASH livers (n = 3 chow; 7 WT and 6 HKO MASH). (C) Glutathione reductase activity measured in MASH livers. Data represented as change in absorbance/min/μg of protein) (n = 4 WT and 6 HKO chow; 6 MASH). (D) Western blot and densitometric analysis of 4-HNE and (E) protein carbonylation measured by OxyBlot in WT and HKO livers. Data represent the mean ± SEM. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, compared with WT animals, unpaired 2-sided Student’s t test for 2-group comparisons (A) and 2-way ANOVA followed by multiple comparison (B–E).

AMPK signaling pathway is increased in miR-33 HKO livers. AMPK is a master regulator of metabolism and mitochondrial homeostasis (77). Our previous results showed that AMPK activation is increased in HKO mice compared with WT mice in both MASL and MASH stages, counteracting the progressive decrease otherwise evident in MASLD (44). These results prompted us to characterize additional posttranscriptional mechanisms regulating AMPK in our model. Notably, we found that the activation of liver kinase B1 (LKB1), a kinase that controls AMPK activity, was enhanced as shown by the increased phosphorylation of LKB1 at serine 428 in HKO livers (Figure 10A). LKB1 activation is regulated by its subcellular compartmentalization through deacetylation and phosphorylation (78–80), correlating with increased levels of sirtuins, a family of histone and protein deacetylases. In accordance, we found increased levels of sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), SIRT2, SIRT3, and SIRT7 and a trend toward upregulation of SIRT6 in HKO livers (Figure 10B). Sirtuin activity is dependent not only on expression levels but also on the availability of NAD+. We found that total NAD and NAD+ as well as the NAD+/NADH ratio were increased in HKO livers (Figure 10C and Supplemental Figure 7A). These results point toward the increased activation of upstream regulators of AMPKα. As previously shown in Figure 2, we found increased FAO and decreased FAs, with increased AMPKα/ACC phosphorylation indicating a broad rewiring of metabolism mediated by AMPK signaling in HKO livers. Consistent with our observations on the effects of AMPK, we found that phosphorylation of ULK1, a downstream target of AMPKα, was also increased in HKO livers, along with the increased levels of LC3bII and ATG5, suggesting a role of AMPKα in the promotion of increased autophagy in HKO livers (Figure 10D). Likewise, HKO livers displayed increased phosphorylation of caspase-6, which has been described to be regulated by AMPK, consistent with reduced hepatocyte cell death in MASH (44) (Supplemental Figure 6F).

Upstream and downstream analysis of AMPKα signaling pathway.Figure 10

Upstream and downstream analysis of AMPKα signaling pathway. (A and B) Western blot analysis and densitometric analysis of housekeeping standard VINCULIN and (A) p-LKB1 (Ser428), LKB1, (B) SIRT1, SIRT2, SIRT3, SIRT5, SIRT6, and SIRT7 in WT and HKO livers from mice fed with CD-HFD for 6 months (MASH). (C) NAD+ levels in WT and HKO MASH livers represented as pmol/mg of tissue (n = 4 chow; 5 MASH). (D) Western blot analysis and densitometric analysis of p-ULK1 (Ser555), ULK1, LC3bI/II, ATG5, and housekeeping standard VINCULIN in WT and HKO MASH livers. Data represent the mean ± SEM (*P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001 compared with WT animals, unpaired 2-sided Student’s t test for 2-group comparisons and 2-way ANOVA followed by multiple comparison).

miR-33 deficiency in hepatocytes reduces MASLD progression to HCC. To analyze whether the improved metabolic function and protection against MASL-MASH progression attenuates the development of HCC in HKO mice, we fed WT and HKO mice a CD-HFD for 15 months. While 75% of WT mice developed tumors, only 40% of HKO mice did (Figure 11A). Tumor quantification revealed a decrease in the average tumor number per mouse in HKO mice (Figure 11B), which was particularly pronounced for large tumors (volume > 20 mm3) (Figure 11C). In agreement with reduced tumor incidence, serum levels of α-fetoprotein (AFP) were significantly reduced in HKO mice compared with WT mice (Figure 11D). Histological analysis of WT and HKO tumors also revealed a decrease in proliferative Ki67-positive cells in tumors from HKO mice compared with WT mice (Figure 11E). Analysis of miR-33 expression by qPCR in livers fed the CD-HFD compared with a standard chow diet for 15 months showed a modest increase in miR-33 expression in MASH, which was not statistically significant (Supplemental Figure 8A). Additionally, increased expression of miR-33 was detected in tumor samples when directly compared with adjacent healthy liver tissue from the same mice in WT samples (Supplemental Figure 8B), suggesting a potential role of miR-33 directly within the tumor microenvironment. Moreover, miR-33 levels correlated with increased levels of Ki67, a proliferation marker (Supplemental Figure 8, B–E).

Hepatic miR-33 deficiency reduces diet-induced tumor incidence.Figure 11

Hepatic miR-33 deficiency reduces diet-induced tumor incidence. (A) Representative images of WT and HKO livers after 15 months of CD-HFD; dashed line used to outline tumors and relative number of mice with and without tumor. (B–D) Graphical representation of (B) total number of tumors/mouse and (C) number of tumors larger > 20 mm3/mouse. (D) Circulating AFP levels (n = 13 WT –and 12 HKO). (E) Representative images of Ki67 staining in liver tumors from WT and HKO mice after 15 months of CD-HFD. Indicated quantification on the right (n = 3). Data represent the mean ± SEM (*P ≤ 0.05, ***P ≤ 0.001 compared with WT animals, unpaired 2-sided Student’s t test for 2-group comparisons and 2-way ANOVA followed by multiple comparison).

Recent studies have highlighted the role of cholesterol in the activation of the gene regulator TAZ and the importance of this for the severity of MASH and progression to HCC (45, 46, 49, 81, 82). YAP/TAZ are transcriptional coactivators of the Hippo pathway that participate in the initiation and progression of different cancers (82–84). Specifically, TAZ levels in HCC have been associated with its initiation and prognosis (49, 81, 85). TAZ upregulation in MASH and HCC has been associated with both increased cholesterol levels and decreased AMPKα activity, and it has been described to participate in the transcriptional regulation of several genes involved in fibrosis, proliferation, superoxide formation, and regulation of metabolism. Furthermore, its upregulation has been described in the pretumor MASH stage (49, 81, 85). Given the role of miR-33 as a key regulatory molecule that controls cholesterol efflux through the targeting of ABCA1 and ABCG1, we hypothesized that the absence of miR-33 in hepatocytes would decrease cholesterol content, potentially attenuating YAP/TAZ activation. Upregulation of TAZ levels in MASH livers was partially abrogated in mice lacking miR-33 in hepatocytes (Figure 12A and Supplemental Figure 8F). We further verified the activation of TAZ in MASH livers by cellular fractionation and immunoblotting for its nuclear localization (Figure 12B). In line with this, expression of downstream TAZ target genes was decreased in HKO livers (Figure 12C). In line with the role of miR-33 in the regulation of cholesterol homeostasis, a decrease in total and free cholesterol content was found the livers from HKO mice compared with WT mice fed with a CD-HFD (Figure 12D). To strengthen the potential link between liver cholesterol and miR-33 levels with YAP/TAZ activation, we cultured AML12 mouse hepatocytes in the absence or presence of LDL-cholesterol (120 μg/mL) and analyzed changes in YAP/TAZ signaling. Analysis of the regulation of YAP/TAZ protein levels verified that cholesterol loading of hepatocytes is sufficient to induce YAP/TAZ stability (Supplemental Figure 8, G and H). Thus, we aimed to determine whether the regulation of miR-33 in hepatocytes modulates YAP/TAZ activation in response to LDL-cholesterol. Overexpression of miR-33 in AML12 cells resulted in increased cholesterol content when cells were loaded with LDL-cholesterol (120 μg/mL) (Supplemental Figure 8, I and J). However, we did not observe differences in cholesterol-sensing genes (Supplemental Figure 8K). In line with the increased cellular cholesterol content, YAP/TAZ activation was increased in response to miR-33 overexpression, in accordance with the increased cellular content of cholesterol (Supplemental Figure 8L). Overall, these results suggest that miR-33 regulates YAP/TAZ activation in hepatocytes through the regulation of cholesterol content, linking cholesterol accumulation within the cells with activation of proliferative pathways associated with HCC.

Hepatic miR-33 deficiency reduces Hippo signaling.Figure 12

Hepatic miR-33 deficiency reduces Hippo signaling. (A) Western blot and densitometric analysis of TAZ and housekeeping standard VINCULIN in WT and HKO livers fed chow diet and CD-HFD for 6 months. (B) Western blot and densitometric analysis of TAZ and housekeeping standard LAMINb in nuclear fractions of livers from WT and HKO mice after 6 months of CD-HFD. (C) qPCR analysis of mRNA expression indicated genes in WT and HKO livers after 6 months of CD-HFD (n = 6 WT and 5 HKO). (D) Liver total and free cholesterol levels after 6 months of CD-HFD measured by gas chromatography–MS (n = 6). Data represented as nmol cholesterol/mg liver protein. Data represent the mean ± SEM. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001 compared with WT animals, unpaired 2-sided Student’s t test for 2-group comparisons (B–D) and 2-way ANOVA followed by multiple comparison (A).

Taken together, our results suggest miR-33 deletion in hepatocytes improves mitochondrial metabolic function, restraining MASLD/MASH progression and in the long term preventing the development of HCC (Figure 13).

Schematic representation of probable miR-33 mechanisms of actionFigure 13

Schematic representation of probable miR-33 mechanisms of action

Discussion

The rise in MASLD associated with overnutrition has reached epidemic levels, but its complexity has hindered the development of effective treatments. This study shows that miR-33 is increased in hepatocytes at different stages of MASLD in human patients and mouse models. Deletion of miR-33 in hepatocytes improves liver function, reducing lipid accumulation and progression of the disease. Numerous studies have demonstrated roles of miR-33 in metabolism, including cholesterol homeostasis, TAG metabolism, autophagy, glucose metabolism, and mitochondrial function (33–41), showing that inhibiting miR-33 reduces atherosclerosis in mice and nonhuman primates (37, 38, 86–91). However, due to the promiscuous nature of miRNAs, the whole-body deficiency of miR-33 has been associated with obesity, dyslipidemia, and insulin resistance (92, 93). These detrimental effects prompted us to study the role of miR-33 in other metabolic diseases, such as MASLD. Recent strategies have emerged to overcome potential undesired effects of miRNA therapies, shedding light on the cell-specific functions of miR-33 and its therapeutic potential. Some of these studies have demonstrated the efficiency of delivering miR-33 inhibitors inside pH low-insertion peptides to the kidney and atherosclerotic lesions (94, 95). Additionally, in a recent study, using a different strategy, our group also demonstrated the safety and efficiency of specifically removing miR-33 from hepatocytes to improve cholesterol and FA metabolism, underscoring the role of hepatic miR-33 in liver metabolism and fibrosis (50). This previous study showed not only that miR-33 suppression in hepatocytes was not responsible for the adverse metabolic effects observed in whole-body deficient mice but also that liver-specific loss of miR-33 improved whole-body metabolism under hyperlipidemic conditions (50). Building upon this model, our current work has focused on the metabolic advantages associated with miR-33 deficiency in hepatocytes, during MASLD-MASH-HCC development, to investigate the long-term alterations in liver function under this chronic inflammatory disease.

The initial characterization of miR-33 HKO mice in this CD-HFD model showed a clear impact on the regulation of cholesterol and glucose metabolism, with minimal effects on body weight, consistent with previous results found for HKO mice on other diets (50). The reduction in steatosis was associated with the modulation of several pathways involved in liver lipid accumulation, including FA uptake, DNL, and FAO. Interestingly, metabolic benefits observed in HKO mice were already observed after feeding the mice for 3 months with the CD-HFD and mostly sustained over the time, suggesting that early protection can prevent the progression of the disease. Taken together, our data suggest that the benefits resulting from miR-33 deletion in hepatocytes are apparent in the context of diet-induced obesity and MASLD. Minimal changes were observed in mice fed a standard chow diet, further suggesting that the improvements in liver metabolism that alleviate lipid buildup are primarily responsible for ameliorating liver injury and progression of the disease. Indeed, most predicted miR-33 targets upregulated in HKO livers were associated with known metabolic genes and functions. Additionally, our results suggest that miR-33 deletion in hepatocytes could affect BA metabolism and homeostasis. Although the lack of major changes in BA content in chow-fed WT and HKO livers was surprising given the role of miR-33 in regulating CYP7A1 and other BA transporters, the changes observed in MASH livers were in line with miR-33 playing a prominent role in the regulation of BA and cholesterol metabolism (54, 60).

One of the most common features in MASLD is the inability to sustain mitochondrial adaptation to nutrient status (18, 20–26, 75). Mitochondria are highly dynamic organelles with the ability to undergo functional and structural changes in response to environment and energy requirements (74). However, in MASLD, as with other metabolic diseases, increased FAO rates to counteract lipid accumulation are thought to result in increased oxidative stress and ER stress, resulting in mitochondrial injury and impaired oxidative phosphorylation (18, 26, 75, 96). The analysis of hepatic mitochondria from WT and HKO mice fed a CD-HFD for 6 months showed that miR-33 deficiency was associated with significant changes in mitochondrial quantity and morphology, suggesting a broader role of miR-33 in metabolism beyond regulation of cholesterol and FAO. The observed changes in mitochondria suggest miR-33 HKO mice have increased mitochondrial biogenesis and mitochondrial dynamics, mechanisms directed by PGC1α, AMPKα, and MFN2, among other markers, a phenotype associated with enhanced oxidative capacity coupled with reduced ROS production, resulting in protection from liver injury (24–26, 74). The approaches used here to study mitochondrial turnover and dynamics suggest a positive regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis and mitochondrial fusion; however, as these processes are related, we cannot exclude the 2 events being interdependent. Several studies have described the direct role of miR-33 in repressing mitochondrial biogenesis and FAO by targeting PGC1α and AMPKα, which are known to participate both in mitochondrial biogenesis and in regulation of fusion/fission processes, suggesting that miR-33 could directly regulate these functions in our model through the downregulation of these 2 targets. Despite employing different approaches to elucidate potential miR-33 target genes involved in the regulation of mitochondrial oxidative stress production or antioxidant pathways, no direct evidence of miR-33 action was found, suggesting that oxidative stress reduction is a consequence of improved mitochondrial biogenesis and dynamics.

The deficiency of miR-33 in hepatocytes was sufficient to protect from HCC development in our diet model. Previous studies aiming to determine the potential oncogenic role of miR-33 in HCC and cell proliferation have reported conflicting results, ranging from a role in inhibiting cell proliferation to antioncogenic roles of miR-33 in HCC cell lines. Similarly inconsistent results were reported in murine models and human samples of HCC, muddling the conclusions about the role of miR-33 in HCC (97–100). While the higher levels of miR-33 detected in tumor samples compared with adjacent healthy tissue and their correlation with Ki67 suggest that miR-33 could be directly involved in promoting tumor progression, the direct role of miR-33 within these tumors should be the subject of further research. Finally, our results align with previous studies showing that YAP/TAZ activation in hepatocytes plays a central role in liver fibrosis and the transition to hepatocellular carcinoma in response to increased cellular cholesterol levels (46). Given the role of miR-33 in cholesterol regulation, we hypothesized that miR-33 could also be contributing to attenuation of HCC development through this mechanism. Cell culture experiments in AML12 hepatocytes indicate the involvement of miR-33 and cholesterol accumulation in activation of YAP/TAZ pathway in hepatocytes. However, given the multiple adaptations regulated in HKO mice, the decrease observed in YAP/TAZ activation could also be a consequence of AMPKα phosphorylation.

This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the mechanisms involved in MASLD-MASH progression and the potential applicability of miR-33 therapeutic approaches for its treatment. The beneficial or detrimental effects of enhanced FAO in MASLD/MASH have been extensively discussed in the past, and our present results bring insight into the beneficial role of FAO in the disease (15, 25, 101, 102). Our findings indicate that the regulation of hepatocyte metabolism by miR-33 is involved in the progression of MASLD/MASH, as well as MASLD/MASH-derived HCC. The direct deletion of miR-33 in hepatocytes protects from the progression of this disease. This may be particularly relevant for the use of approaches such as N-acetylgalactosamine–conjugated antisense oligonucleotides, which have been demonstrated to effectively promote targeted delivery of inhibitors to the liver (103). In the context of human pathology, it is important to note that while mice possess only the miR-33a isoform of miR-33, humans express both miR-33a and miR-33b isoforms, encoded within the SREBF2 and SREBF1 genes, respectively, which are regulated by different mechanisms (104, 105). Recent observations of the transcriptional activity of both SREBF1 and SREBF2 in both murine and human MASLD (52) suggest that in humans, miR-33b may also contribute to the development of the disease, supporting the therapeutic potential of targeting hepatic miR-33 in human pathology.

This work demonstrates that the depletion of miR-33 in the hepatocytes is sufficient to increase hepatic metabolic activity and reduce lipid accumulation in the liver protecting from MASLD and MASH. However, in this study, we did not determine whether a pharmacological approach to revert the progression of the disease would have a similar impact. Future studies should investigate whether pharmacological approaches can replicate the metabolic benefits observed in this study by selectively inhibiting miR-33 in hepatocytes. Although scRNA-Seq data did not reveal major alterations in miR-33 target genes in cell types other than hepatocytes, it will be important to confirm if the Albumin-Cre used in this study might affect miR-33 expression in liver cholangiocytes. While the study focused on changes in described and predicted miR-33 target genes, future investigations should assess the interaction of miR-33 with mRNA in hepatocytes under MASLD conditions to better understand the precise mechanisms involved. Finally, this study suggests that the protection from HCC development is mainly mediated through the steady long-term effect of miR-33 deletion in hepatocytes. However, based on our data, we cannot discard a potential intrinsic role of miR-33 within the tumor microenvironment, promoting tumor growth and proliferation. Further exploration is needed to elucidate the exact role of miR-33 within the tumor in the context of obesity-induced HCC. By addressing these avenues, future research can deepen our understanding of the intricate roles of miR-33 in liver metabolism and potential therapeutic interventions for MASLD, MASH, and HCC. These investigations will not only advance our knowledge of molecular mechanisms but also pave the way for targeted precision medicine approaches in the clinical management of these complex liver diseases.

Methods

Sex as a biological variable. Animals included in this study involved male mice. In our previous studies (50, 106) we have demonstrated how miR-33 conditional knockout in the liver and other tissues has similar effect in male and females. Thus, sex was not considered a biological variable, and for ethical and availability reasons, studies were performed only in males. Results are expected to be relatable to both sexes. For human liver biopsies, liver core biopsies were from obese men and women undergoing bariatric surgery, have been described previously (107), and were processed for RNA isolation. Sex difference analyses were not performed due to the low frequency of suitable donors.

Animals. miR-33–KO mice (miR-33loxP/loxP) were generated as previously described (50, 106). To generate HKO mice, miR-33loxP/loxP mice were bred with transgenic mice expressing Cre recombinase under the control of a hepatocyte-specific promoter: albumin promoter (The Jackson Laboratory stock 003574). To produce diet-induced liver disease, mice were fed a standard chow diet until 8 weeks of age. Then chow diet was replaced by a modified CD-HFD, containing 45% of fat and no choline added (D05010402, Research Diets). Mice were maintained with CD-HFD feeding for 3, 6, or 15 months to induce steatosis, MASH, or HCC at respective time points (51). Body weight was measured throughout diet feeding studies, and analysis of body composition was performed by Echo MRI (Echo Medical System). All mice were sex and age matched and kept in individually ventilated cages in a pathogen-free facility. Mice were fasted for 6 hours at end time point experiments.

Statistics. All data are expressed as mean ± SEM unless indicated. Statistical differences were measured using unpaired 2-sided Student’s t tests or 2-way ANOVA. Normality was checked using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. A value of P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism Software Version 9.0. Specific statistics used for scRNA-Seq and downstream analysis are detailed in Supplemental Methods.

Study approval. Animal experiments were conducted under the ethical guidelines of, and protocols approved by, the IACUC at Yale University School of Medicine (animal protocol 2019-11577). The use of human tissue was approved by the Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (CF12/2339-2012001246; CF15/3041-2015001282). All participants gave their written informed consent before participating in this study.

Data availability. All Supporting data values are provided in the Supporting Data Values file. RNA-Seq data have been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (GSE220093). scRNA-Seq data have been deposited in the NCBI GEO database (GSE259277).

Author contributions

PFT, YS, and CFH designed the research. PFT, MPC, HZ, JS, NLP, NEB, LG, MCS, CEX, WB, and OPR performed research and analyzed data. XY, RAH, AMB, and TT analyzed data and edited the manuscript. PFT and CFH wrote the manuscript.

Supplemental material

View Supplemental data

View Unedited blot and gel images

View Supporting data values

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the NIH (R35HL135820 to CFH, R35HL155988 to YS, 1K01DK120794 to NLP, and R00HL150234 to LG), the American Heart Association (20TPA35490416 to CFH and 874771 and 23CDA1055007 to PFT), the American Diabetes Association (11-23-PDF-09 to MPC), and Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI21/01173 to OPR).

Address correspondence to: Carlos Fernández-Hernando, 10 Amistad Street, Room 437c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Phone: 203.737.4615; Email: carlos.fernandez@yale.edu. Or to: Pablo Fernández-Tussy, 10 Amistad Street, Room 420c, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Email: pablo.fernandeztussy@yale.edu.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Copyright: © 2024, Fernández-Tussy et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reference information: JCI Insight. 2024;9(19):e168476.https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.168476.

References
  1. Younossi Z, et al. Global perspectives on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2019;69(6):2672–2682.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Younossi ZM. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease - a global public health perspective. J Hepatol. 2019;70(3):531–544.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Huang DQ, et al. Global epidemiology of NAFLD-related HCC: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;18(4):223–238.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Younossi Z, et al. Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;15(1):11–20.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Paik JM, et al. Global burden of NAFLD and chronic liver disease among adolescents and young adults. Hepatology. 2022;75(5):1204–1217.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Sanyal AJ. Past, present and future perspectives in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16(6):377–386.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Lim GEH, et al. An observational data meta-analysis on the differences in prevalence and risk factors between MAFLD vs NAFLD. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;21(3):619–629.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Quek J, et al. Global prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in the overweight and obese population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;8(1):20–30.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Loomba R, et al. Mechanisms and disease consequences of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Cell. 2021;184(10):2537–2564.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Younossi Z, et al. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the fastest growing cause of hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant candidates. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(4):748–755.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Le MH, et al. 2019 Global NAFLD prevalence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;20(12):2809–2817.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Huang DQ, et al. Changing global epidemiology of liver cancer from 2010 to 2019: NASH is the fastest growing cause of liver cancer. Cell Metab. 2022;34(7):969–977.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Tiniakos DG, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: pathology and pathogenesis. Annu Rev Pathol. 2010;5:145–171.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Tilg H, Hotamisligil GS. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: cytokine-adipokine interplay and regulation of insulin resistance. Gastroenterology. 2006;131(3):934–945.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Dufour JF, et al. Current therapies and new developments in NASH. Gut. 2022;71(10):2123–2134.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Chalasani N, et al. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2018;67(1):328–357.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Bence KK, Birnbaum MJ. Metabolic drivers of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Mol Metab. 2021;50:101143.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  18. Begriche K, et al. Mitochondrial adaptations and dysfunctions in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2013;58(4):1497–1507.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Yki-Järvinen H. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease as a cause and a consequence of metabolic syndrome. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2(11):901–910.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Moore MP, et al. Compromised hepatic mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation and reduced markers of mitochondrial turnover in human NAFLD. Hepatology. 2022;76(5):1452–1465.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Wei Y, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and mitochondrial dysfunction. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(2):193–199.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Longo M, et al. Mitochondrial dynamics and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): new perspectives for a fairy-tale ending? Metabolism. 2021;117:154708.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Sookoian S, et al. Epigenetic regulation of insulin resistance in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: impact of liver methylation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator 1α promoter. Hepatology. 2010;52(6):1992–2000.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Li R, et al. Role of mitochondrial quality control in the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12(7):6467–6485.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Sunny NE, et al. Mitochondrial adaptation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: novel mechanisms and treatment strategies. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2017;28(4):250–260.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Koliaki C, et al. Adaptation of hepatic mitochondrial function in humans with non-alcoholic fatty liver is lost in steatohepatitis. Cell Metab. 2015;21(5):739–746.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Calle RA, et al. ACC inhibitor alone or co-administered with a DGAT2 inhibitor in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: two parallel, placebo-controlled, randomized phase 2a trials. Nat Med. 2021;27(10):1836–1848.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Kim CW, et al. Acetyl CoA carboxylase inhibition reduces hepatic steatosis but elevates plasma triglycerides in mice and humans: a bedside to bench investigation. Cell Metab. 2017;26(2):394–406.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  29. Batchuluun B, et al. Lipogenesis inhibitors: therapeutic opportunities and challenges. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2022;21(4):283–305.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Vijayakumar A, et al. Combinations of an acetyl CoA carboxylase inhibitor with hepatic lipid modulating agents do not augment antifibrotic efficacy in preclinical models of NASH and fibrosis. Hepatol Commun. 2022;6(9):2298–2309.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  31. Gjorgjieva M, et al. miRNAs and NAFLD: from pathophysiology to therapy. Gut. 2019;68(11):2065–2079.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  32. Rottiers V, Naar AM. MicroRNAs in metabolism and metabolic disorders. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012;13(4):239–250.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  33. Rayner KJ, et al. MiR-33 contributes to the regulation of cholesterol homeostasis. Science. 2010;328(5985):1570–1573.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  34. Marquart TJ, et al. miR-33 links SREBP-2 induction to repression of sterol transporters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(27):12228–12232.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  35. Najafi-Shoushtari SH, et al. MicroRNA-33 and the SREBP host genes cooperate to control cholesterol homeostasis. Science. 2010;328(5985):1566–1569.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Dávalos A, et al. miR-33a/b contribute to the regulation of fatty acid metabolism and insulin signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(22):9232–9237.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  37. Karunakaran D, et al. Macrophage mitochondrial energy status regulates cholesterol efflux and is enhanced by anti-miR33 in atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 2015;117(3):266–278.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Ouimet M, et al. MicroRNA-33-dependent regulation of macrophage metabolism directs immune cell polarization in atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(12):4334–4348.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Ouimet M, et al. microRNA-33 regulates macrophage autophagy in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2017;37(6):1058–1067.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  40. Ramirez CM, et al. MicroRNA 33 regulates glucose metabolism. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33(15):2891–2902.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Nie H, et al. Hepatocyte miR-33a mediates mitochondrial dysfunction and hepatosteatosis by suppressing NDUFA5. J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22(12):6285–6293.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  42. Vega-Badillo J, et al. Hepatic miR-33a/miR-144 and their target gene ABCA1 are associated with steatohepatitis in morbidly obese subjects. Liver Int. 2016;36(9):1383–1391.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  43. Erhartova D, et al. Serum miR-33a is associated with steatosis and inflammation in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease after liver transplantation. PLoS One. 2019;14(11):e0224820.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  44. Zhao P, et al. An AMPK-caspase-6 axis controls liver damage in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Science. 2020;367(6478):652–660.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  45. Wang X, et al. Hepatocyte TAZ/WWTR1 promotes inflammation and fibrosis in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Cell Metab. 2016;24(6):848–862.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  46. Wang X, et al. Cholesterol stabilizes TAZ in hepatocytes to promote experimental non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Cell Metab. 2020;31(5):969–986.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  47. Alsamman S, et al. Targeting acid ceramidase inhibits YAP/TAZ signaling to reduce fibrosis in mice. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12(557):eaay8798.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  48. Wang X, et al. A Therapeutic silencing RNA targeting hepatocyte TAZ prevents and reverses fibrosis in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in mice. Hepatol Commun. 2019;3(9):1221–1234.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  49. Wang X, et al. TAZ-induced Cybb contributes to liver tumor formation in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J Hepatol. 2022;76(4):910–920.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  50. Price NL, et al. Loss of hepatic miR-33 improves metabolic homeostasis and liver function without altering body weight or atherosclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(5):e2006478118.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  51. Wolf MJ, et al. Metabolic activation of intrahepatic CD8+ T cells and NKT cells causes nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and liver cancer via cross-talk with hepatocytes. Cancer Cell. 2014;26(4):549–564.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  52. Yang H, et al. A network-based approach reveals the dysregulated transcriptional regulation in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. iScience. 2021;24(11):103222.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  53. Gerin I, et al. Expression of miR-33 from an SREBP2 intron inhibits cholesterol export and fatty acid oxidation. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(44):33652–33661.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  54. Li T, et al. Regulation of cholesterol and bile acid homeostasis by the cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase/steroid response element-binding protein 2/microRNA-33a axis in mice. Hepatology. 2013;58(3):1111–1121.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  55. Ahmad TR, Haeusler RA. Bile acids in glucose metabolism and insulin signalling - mechanisms and research needs. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019;15(12):701–712.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  56. Haeusler RA, et al. Human insulin resistance is associated with increased plasma levels of 12α-hydroxylated bile acids. Diabetes. 2013;62(12):4184–4191.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  57. Xie G, et al. Conjugated secondary 12α-hydroxylated bile acids promote liver fibrogenesis. EBioMedicine. 2021;66:103290.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  58. Aranha MM, et al. Bile acid levels are increased in the liver of patients with steatohepatitis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;20(6):519–525.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  59. Jiao N, et al. Suppressed hepatic bile acid signalling despite elevated production of primary and secondary bile acids in NAFLD. Gut. 2018;67(10):1881–1891.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  60. Allen RM, et al. miR-33 controls the expression of biliary transporters, and mediates statin- and diet-induced hepatotoxicity. EMBO Mol Med. 2012;4(9):882–895.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  61. Hou J, et al. TREM2 sustains macrophage-hepatocyte metabolic coordination in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and sepsis. J Clin Invest. 2021;131(4):e135197.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  62. Van Koppen A, et al. Uncovering a predictive molecular signature for the onset of NASH-related fibrosis in a translational NASH mouse model. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;5(1):83–98.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  63. Filliol A, et al. Opposing roles of hepatic stellate cell subpopulations in hepatocarcinogenesis. Nature. 2022;610(7931):356–365.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  64. An X, et al. Chemerin/CMKLR1 ameliorates nonalcoholic steatohepatitis by promoting autophagy and alleviating oxidative stress through the JAK2-STAT3 pathway. Peptides. 2021;135:170422.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  65. Pohl R, et al. Chemerin overexpression in the liver protects against inflammation in experimental non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Biomedicines. 2022;10(1):132.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  66. Chung YH, et al. BMP-2 restoration aids in recovery from liver fibrosis by attenuating TGF-β1 signaling. Lab Invest. 2018;98(8):999–1013.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  67. Kinoshita K, et al. Adenovirus-mediated expression of BMP-7 suppresses the development of liver fibrosis in rats. Gut. 2007;56(5):706–714.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  68. Zou GL, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein-7 represses hepatic stellate cell activation and liver fibrosis via regulation of TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25(30):4222–4234.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  69. Luo J, et al. Mannan-binding lectin via interaction with cell surface calreticulin promotes senescence of activated hepatic stellate cells to limit liver fibrosis progression. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;14(1):75–99.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  70. Jakubowski A, et al. TWEAK induces liver progenitor cell proliferation. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(9):2330–2340.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  71. Price NL, Fernández-Hernando C. Novel role of miR-33 in regulating of mitochondrial function. Circ Res. 2015;117(3):225–228.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  72. Wu Z, et al. Mechanisms controlling mitochondrial biogenesis and respiration through the thermogenic coactivator PGC-1. Cell. 1999;98(1):115–124.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  73. Piccinin E, et al. Metabolic aspects in NAFLD, NASH and hepatocellular carcinoma: the role of PGC1 coactivators. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16(3):160–174.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  74. Picca A, et al. Mitochondrial quality control mechanisms as molecular targets in cardiac ageing. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018;15(9):543–554.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  75. Nassir F, Ibdah JA. Role of mitochondria in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(5):8713–8742.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  76. Zhao RZ, et al. Mitochondrial electron transport chain, ROS generation and uncoupling (Review). Int J Mol Med. 2019;44(1):3–15.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  77. Herzig S, Shaw RJ. AMPK: guardian of metabolism and mitochondrial homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018;19(2):121–135.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  78. Yang SJ, et al. Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma by rosiglitazone increases sirt6 expression and ameliorates hepatic steatosis in rats. PLoS One. 2011;6(2):e17057.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  79. Yang SJ, et al. Sirt1 and Sirt6 mediate beneficial effects of rosiglitazone on hepatic lipid accumulation. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e105456.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  80. Hou X, et al. SIRT1 regulates hepatocyte lipid metabolism through activating AMP-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(29):20015–20026.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  81. Moon H, et al. Activated TAZ induces liver cancer in collaboration with EGFR/HER2 signaling pathways. BMC Cancer. 2022;22(1):423.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  82. Moya IM, et al. Peritumoral activation of the Hippo pathway effectors YAP and TAZ suppresses liver cancer in mice. Science. 2019;366(6468):1029–1034.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  83. Zanconato F, et al. YAP/TAZ at the roots of cancer. Cancer Cell. 2016;29(6):783–803.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  84. Moroishi T, et al. The emerging roles of YAP and TAZ in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15(2):73–79.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  85. Hagenbeek TJ, et al. The Hippo pathway effector TAZ induces TEAD-dependent liver inflammation and tumors. Sci Signal. 2018;11(547):eaaj1757.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  86. Rayner KJ, et al. Inhibition of miR-33a/b in non-human primates raises plasma HDL and lowers VLDL triglycerides. Nature. 2011;478(7369):404–407.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  87. Rottiers V, et al. Pharmacological inhibition of a microRNA family in nonhuman primates by a seed-targeting 8-mer antimiR. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(212):212ra162.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  88. Rayner KJ, et al. Antagonism of miR-33 in mice promotes reverse cholesterol transport and regression of atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(7):2921–2931.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  89. Rotllan N, et al. Therapeutic silencing of microRNA-33 inhibits the progression of atherosclerosis in Ldlr-/- mice--brief report. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33(8):1973–1977.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  90. Distel E, et al. miR33 inhibition overcomes deleterious effects of diabetes mellitus on atherosclerosis plaque regression in mice. Circ Res. 2014;115(9):759–769.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  91. Price NL, et al. Genetic dissection of the impact of miR-33a and miR-33b during the progression of atherosclerosis. Cell Rep. 2017;21(5):1317–1330.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  92. Horie T, et al. MicroRNA-33 regulates sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1 expression in mice. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2883.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  93. Goedeke L, et al. A regulatory role for microRNA 33* in controlling lipid metabolism gene expression. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33(11):2339–2352.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  94. Zhang X, et al. Targeted suppression of miRNA-33 using pHLIP Improves atherosclerosis regression. Circ Res. 2022;131(1):77–90.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  95. Price NL, et al. Genetic deficiency or pharmacological inhibition of miR-33 protects from kidney fibrosis. JCI Insight. 2019;4(22):e131102.
    View this article via: JCI Insight CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  96. Simões ICM, et al. Mitochondria in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2018;95:93–99.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  97. Cirera-Salinas D, et al. Mir-33 regulates cell proliferation and cell cycle progression. Cell Cycle. 2012;11(5):922–933.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  98. Han SY, et al. MicroRNA-33a-3p suppresses cell migration and invasion by directly targeting PBX3 in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7(27):42461–42473.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  99. Xie RT, et al. MicroRNA-33a downregulation is associated with tumorigenesis and poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Lett. 2018;15(4):4571–4577.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  100. Yalçınkaya B, et al. Role of mir-33a, mir-203b, mir361-3p, and mir-424 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Turk J Med Sci. 2021;51(2):638–643.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  101. Dufour JF, et al. Combination therapy for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: rationale, opportunities and challenges. Gut. 2020;69(10):1877–1884.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  102. Xu X, et al. Targeted therapeutics and novel signaling pathways in non-alcohol-associated fatty liver/steatohepatitis (NAFL/NASH). Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7(1):287.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  103. Prakash TP, et al. Targeted delivery of antisense oligonucleotides to hepatocytes using triantennary N-acetyl galactosamine improves potency 10-fold in mice. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(13):8796–8807.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  104. Brown MS, Goldstein JL. The SREBP pathway: regulation of cholesterol metabolism by proteolysis of a membrane-bound transcription factor. Cell. 1997;89(3):331–340.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  105. Nishino T, et al. SREBF1/microRNA-33b axis exhibits potent effect on unstable atherosclerotic plaque formation in vivo. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2018;38(10):2460–2473.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  106. Price NL, et al. microRNA-33 controls hunger signaling in hypothalamic AgRP neurons. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):2131.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  107. Grohmann M, et al. Obesity drives STAT-1-dependent NASH and STAT-3-dependent HCC. Cell. 2018;175(5):1289–1306.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (August 27, 2024): In-Press Preview
  • Version 2 (October 8, 2024): Electronic publication

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

Article has an altmetric score of 2
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article (0)

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts

Posted by 2 X users
20 readers on Mendeley
See more details