Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Commensal oral microbiota induces osteoimmunomodulatory effects separate from systemic microbiome in mice
Jessica D. Hathaway-Schrader, … , Caroline Westwater, Chad M. Novince
Jessica D. Hathaway-Schrader, … , Caroline Westwater, Chad M. Novince
Published January 25, 2022
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2022;7(4):e140738. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.140738.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Bone biology Microbiology

Commensal oral microbiota induces osteoimmunomodulatory effects separate from systemic microbiome in mice

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Commensal microbes critically regulate skeletal homeostasis, yet the impact of specific microbiota communities on osteoimmune response mechanisms is unknown. To discern osteoimmunomodulatory effects imparted by the commensal oral microbiota that are distinct from the systemic microbiota, osteoimmunology studies were performed in both alveolar bone and nonoral skeletal sites of specific pathogen–free (SPF) versus germ-free (GF) mice and SPF mice subjected to saline versus chlorhexidine oral rinses. SPF versus GF mice had reduced cortical/trabecular bone and an enhanced pro-osteoclastic phenotype in alveolar bone. TLR signaling and Th17 cells that have known pro-osteoclastic actions were increased in alveolar BM, but not long BM, of SPF versus GF mice. MHC II antigen presentation genes and activated DCs and CD4+ T cells were elevated in alveolar BM, but not long BM, of SPF versus GF mice. These findings were substantiated by in vitro allostimulation studies demonstrating increased activated DCs derived from alveolar BM, but not long BM, of SPF versus GF mice. Chlorhexidine antiseptic rinse depleted the oral, but not gut, bacteriome in SPF mice. Findings from saline- versus chlorhexidine-treated SPF mice corroborated outcomes from SPF versus GF mice, which reveals that the commensal oral microbiota imparts osteoimmunomodulatory effects separate from the systemic microbiome.

Authors

Jessica D. Hathaway-Schrader, Johannes D. Aartun, Nicole A. Poulides, Megan B. Kuhn, Blakely E. McCormick, Michael E. Chew, Emily Huang, Richard P. Darveau, Caroline Westwater, Chad M. Novince

×

Figure 2

Burden of commensal oral microbiota drives alveolar bone loss.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Burden of commensal oral microbiota drives alveolar bone loss.
(A–D) Alv...
(A–D) Alveolar bone loss was assessed by evaluating the linear distance between the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and alveolar bone crest (ABC) at the maxillary first molar in reconstructed μCT images. (A and B) Representative μCT images and quantitative measures of CEJ-ABC linear distance (blue line) at the mesiobuccal, distobuccal, and midlingual aspect of the maxillary first molar of SPF versus GF mice; n = 4/gp. (C and D) Representative μCT images and quantitative measures of CEJ-ABC linear distance at the mesiobuccal, distobuccal, and midlingual aspect of the maxillary first molar of SPF mice treated with saline or CHX oral rinse from age 6 to 12 weeks; n = 6/gp. (E–H) 16S rDNA analysis of bacterial load (reported as 2–ΔCt) and phylum levels (reported as 2–ΔΔCt) for (E and F) maxillary gingiva and (G and H) fecal pellets in SPF mice treated with saline or CHX oral rinse from age 6 to 12 weeks; n = 6/gp. Unpaired t test; data are presented as mean ± SEM; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts