Research ArticleImmunology Free access | 10.1172/jci.insight.126457
1Department of Immunology and Rheumatology and
2Department of Genetics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Address correspondence to: José C. Crispín or Florencia Rosetti, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga #15, Mexico City, Mexico 14080. Phone: 5255.5487.0900 ext. 2610; Email: carlos.crispina@incmnsz.mx (JCC); florencia.rosettis@incmnsz.mx (FR).
Find articles by Madera-Salcedo, I. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
1Department of Immunology and Rheumatology and
2Department of Genetics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Address correspondence to: José C. Crispín or Florencia Rosetti, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga #15, Mexico City, Mexico 14080. Phone: 5255.5487.0900 ext. 2610; Email: carlos.crispina@incmnsz.mx (JCC); florencia.rosettis@incmnsz.mx (FR).
Find articles by Sánchez-Hernández, B. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
1Department of Immunology and Rheumatology and
2Department of Genetics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Address correspondence to: José C. Crispín or Florencia Rosetti, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga #15, Mexico City, Mexico 14080. Phone: 5255.5487.0900 ext. 2610; Email: carlos.crispina@incmnsz.mx (JCC); florencia.rosettis@incmnsz.mx (FR).
Find articles by Svyryd, Y. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Immunology and Rheumatology and
2Department of Genetics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Address correspondence to: José C. Crispín or Florencia Rosetti, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga #15, Mexico City, Mexico 14080. Phone: 5255.5487.0900 ext. 2610; Email: carlos.crispina@incmnsz.mx (JCC); florencia.rosettis@incmnsz.mx (FR).
Find articles by Esquivel-Velázquez, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
1Department of Immunology and Rheumatology and
2Department of Genetics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Address correspondence to: José C. Crispín or Florencia Rosetti, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga #15, Mexico City, Mexico 14080. Phone: 5255.5487.0900 ext. 2610; Email: carlos.crispina@incmnsz.mx (JCC); florencia.rosettis@incmnsz.mx (FR).
Find articles by Rodríguez-Rodríguez, N. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
1Department of Immunology and Rheumatology and
2Department of Genetics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Address correspondence to: José C. Crispín or Florencia Rosetti, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga #15, Mexico City, Mexico 14080. Phone: 5255.5487.0900 ext. 2610; Email: carlos.crispina@incmnsz.mx (JCC); florencia.rosettis@incmnsz.mx (FR).
Find articles by Trejo-Zambrano, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Immunology and Rheumatology and
2Department of Genetics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Address correspondence to: José C. Crispín or Florencia Rosetti, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga #15, Mexico City, Mexico 14080. Phone: 5255.5487.0900 ext. 2610; Email: carlos.crispina@incmnsz.mx (JCC); florencia.rosettis@incmnsz.mx (FR).
Find articles by García-González, H. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Immunology and Rheumatology and
2Department of Genetics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Address correspondence to: José C. Crispín or Florencia Rosetti, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga #15, Mexico City, Mexico 14080. Phone: 5255.5487.0900 ext. 2610; Email: carlos.crispina@incmnsz.mx (JCC); florencia.rosettis@incmnsz.mx (FR).
Find articles by Hernández-Molina, G. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
1Department of Immunology and Rheumatology and
2Department of Genetics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Address correspondence to: José C. Crispín or Florencia Rosetti, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga #15, Mexico City, Mexico 14080. Phone: 5255.5487.0900 ext. 2610; Email: carlos.crispina@incmnsz.mx (JCC); florencia.rosettis@incmnsz.mx (FR).
Find articles by Mutchinick, O. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Immunology and Rheumatology and
2Department of Genetics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Address correspondence to: José C. Crispín or Florencia Rosetti, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga #15, Mexico City, Mexico 14080. Phone: 5255.5487.0900 ext. 2610; Email: carlos.crispina@incmnsz.mx (JCC); florencia.rosettis@incmnsz.mx (FR).
Find articles by Alcocer-Varela, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Immunology and Rheumatology and
2Department of Genetics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Address correspondence to: José C. Crispín or Florencia Rosetti, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga #15, Mexico City, Mexico 14080. Phone: 5255.5487.0900 ext. 2610; Email: carlos.crispina@incmnsz.mx (JCC); florencia.rosettis@incmnsz.mx (FR).
Find articles by Rosetti, F. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Immunology and Rheumatology and
2Department of Genetics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Address correspondence to: José C. Crispín or Florencia Rosetti, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga #15, Mexico City, Mexico 14080. Phone: 5255.5487.0900 ext. 2610; Email: carlos.crispina@incmnsz.mx (JCC); florencia.rosettis@incmnsz.mx (FR).
Find articles by Crispín, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
Published July 23, 2019 - More info
Chronic inflammation causes target organ damage in patients with systemic autoimmune diseases. The factors that allow this protracted response are poorly understood. We analyzed the transcriptional regulation of PPP2R2B (B55β), a molecule necessary for the termination of the immune response, in patients with autoimmune diseases. Altered expression of B55β conditioned resistance to cytokine withdrawal–induced death (CWID) in patients with autoimmune diseases. The impaired upregulation of B55β was caused by inflammation-driven hypermethylation of specific cytosines located within a regulatory element of PPP2R2B preventing CCCTC-binding factor binding. This phenotype could be induced in healthy T cells by exposure to TNF-α. Our results reveal a gene whose expression is affected by an acquired defect, through an epigenetic mechanism, in the setting of systemic autoimmunity. Because failure to remove activated T cells through CWID could contribute to autoimmune pathology, this mechanism illustrates a vicious cycle through which autoimmune inflammation contributes to its own perpetuation.
A common hallmark of systemic autoimmune diseases is the loss of immune tolerance and the development of a chronic autoimmune response revealed by the presence of autoantibodies and increased numbers of activated T cells (1). The factors that underlie chronic immune activation are poorly understood, but constant and ubiquitous presence of antigens and regulatory T cell dysfunction have been proposed to contribute (2). Patients in which regulatory mechanisms are in place tend to have milder disease. For example, patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) whose T cells exhibit a gene expression profile indicative of exhaustion have a better prognosis than patients with no transcriptional signs of T cell exhaustion (3, 4). Therefore, a better understanding of the mechanisms that limit the magnitude and length of immune responses and the identification of those that fail during autoimmunity is warranted.
Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) is a ubiquitously expressed serine/threonine phosphatase involved in a large number of fundamental cellular processes, including apoptosis (5). PP2A is a heterotrimeric enzyme composed of a highly conserved catalytic subunit (PP2A C), a scaffold subunit (PP2A A), and a variety of regulatory subunits (PP2A B) that associate with the PP2A A/C heterodimer in a mutually exclusive manner. The regulatory subunits of PP2A are particularly relevant because they determine the specificity and subcellular location of the holoenzyme (6). PP2A B55β (henceforth referred to as B55β) is induced in activated T cells by cytokine deprivation, and its presence is necessary and sufficient for T cells to undergo cytokine withdrawal–induced death (CWID) through poorly understood mechanisms (7). The expression of B55β, tightly regulated at the transcriptional level, is deficient in patients with SLE whose T cells are resistant to apoptosis (7). Thus, failed induction of B55β could contribute to the perpetuation of T cell activation in patients with SLE.
The phenotype and behavior of T cells from patients with autoimmune diseases is grossly abnormal, and, in many cases, altered gene expression has been identified as a culprit (8). Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have linked a number of loci with different autoimmune diseases (9). This has allowed the identification of genes whose abnormal expression might be facilitated by risk-conferring genetic variants (10). Because immune cells dramatically modify their transcriptional profile in response to environmental stimuli, it has been hard to distinguish the contribution of preexisting genetic variants from the effects imposed by an abnormal milieu. It is reasonable to assume that the behavior of immune cells represents the result of repetitive adaptations to the environment, biased in a qualitative and quantitative manner by the genetic elements variably present in each individual.
In this work, we have investigated the mechanisms that underlie defective B55β expression in patients with SLE and other autoimmune diseases. We have analyzed the genetic and epigenetic factors that regulate the transcription of PPP2R2B, the gene that encodes B55β. We provide data that demonstrate that, in patients with systemic autoimmune diseases, PPP2R2B transcription is affected by an epigenetic mechanism driven by inflammation that hampers the binding of CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) to its target region. Moreover, we show that defective expression of B55β can be induced in healthy T cells by the action of a proinflammatory environment. Our results illustrate how a pathological milieu can affect T cell behavior, generating a vicious cycle that perpetuates autoimmunity.
The regulation of B55β expression is altered in patients with autoimmune diseases. B55β is induced by cytokine withdrawal in activated T cells from humans and mice (7). Its expression is necessary and sufficient for T cells to undergo CWID (7). To explore this mechanism in humans with autoimmune diseases, we isolated peripheral blood T cells from healthy donors (HDs) and patients with SLE, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and primary Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) (Supplemental Table 1; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.126457DS1). T cells were activated in vitro with plate-bound anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 and expanded in the presence of IL-2 (11). Ten days after activation, cells were counted, washed, and resuspended in fresh RPMI devoid of IL-2 (Supplemental Figure 1). To examine the kinetics of B55β transcription, RNA was isolated from T cells before (basal) and after IL-2 deprivation, and quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed. Expression of B55β in activated T cell blasts before IL-2 withdrawal was similar between HDs and patients with RA and SS. However, PPP2R2B mRNA abundance was significantly lower in patients with SLE than in HDs (0.50-fold, P = 0.024; Figure 1A). As expected, 2 days after IL-2 withdrawal, B55β levels had increased ~3-fold in HDs but remained low in patients with SLE (0.36-fold compared with HDs, P = 0.002). The kinetics of B55β expression were conserved in patients with SS, who in fact had higher levels than HDs 48 hours after IL-2 deprivation, whereas T cells from patients with RA exhibited a small increase in B55β that was not statistically different from the response of HDs (Figure 1A). When PPP2R2B mRNA levels were paired to compare the response of each individual sample to IL-2 withdrawal, HDs and patients with SS exhibited the expected behavior as B55β levels increased 2.27 ± 0.35–fold (P = 0.005) and 3.36 ± 0.76–fold (P = 0.007), respectively. However, the response of B55β to IL-2 withdrawal was heterogeneous in patients with SLE and RA; although the gene was induced in some samples, it showed no response in T cells from a large fraction of the patients (Figure 1, B and C). As a result, the mean PPP2R2B mRNA abundance was not statistically different before (basal) and after IL-2 withdrawal (SLE, P = 0.066; RA, P = 0.064) (Figure 1B). To assess the incidence of impaired B55β induction in response to IL-2 withdrawal, we divided the samples into 3 groups: (a) normal B55β induction, defined as an increment of >1.5-fold at 24 hours of IL-2 deprivation; (b) no change, defined as B55β levels between 1.5- and 0.5-fold at 24 hours of IL-2 deprivation; (c) decrease, defined as B55β levels <0.5-fold at 24 hours of IL-2 deprivation. As shown in Figure 1C, IL-2 deprivation induced an increase in B55β expression in 70% of HDs but only in 52% of patients with RA, 50% of patients with SLE, and 58% of patients with SS. Moreover, whereas B55β levels decreased only in 1 (out of 20) HD, they decreased in 19%, 25%, and 16% of patients with RA, SLE, and SS, respectively. These differences were statistically significant (Figure 1C).
Expression and induction of B55β is impaired in T cells from patients with systemic autoimmune diseases. (A) Abundance of the B55β transcript was quantified in activated T cell blasts from healthy donors (HDs) and patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and Sjögren’s syndrome (SS), before (basal) and 48 hours after IL-2 withdrawal. Data are presented as median and quartiles (25th to 75th). Whiskers represent the 10th and 90th percentiles, and outliers are indicated by circles (HD basal vs. SLE basal P = 0.024; HD 48 hours vs. SLE 48 hours P = 0.002; HD 48 hours vs. SS 48 hours P = 0.012; Mann-Whitney U test) (HD n = 25; SLE n = 32; RA n = 28; SS n = 21). (B) Induction of B55β induced by IL-2 withdrawal (24 hours) is shown (HD basal vs. 24 hours P = 0.005; SLE basal vs. 24 hours P = 0.066; RA basal vs. 24 hours P = 0.064; SS basal vs. 24 hours P = 0.007, paired two-tailed t test) (HD n = 20; SLE n = 20; RA n = 21; SS n = 16). (C) The proportion of controls and patients with increased B55β expression after IL-2 withdrawal is shown. The number in the pie chart indicates the number of controls or patients included in the analysis. Under the corresponding pie chart, χ2 of the distribution ratio (increase/no change/decrease) of HDs versus each autoimmune disease is indicated. IL-2 w, IL-2 withdrawal.
Defective B55β regulation is associated with impaired CWID. To determine the functional effects of the abnormal B55β expression kinetics, we analyzed apoptosis induced by cytokine withdrawal (CWID) in T cells from HDs and patients with autoimmune diseases (AID). Cells from patients with systemic AID exhibited a tendency to die less when subjected to CWID. This was particularly obvious when CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were analyzed separately (Figure 2A). To determine whether defective induction of B55β, significantly more common in T cells from patients with AID, was involved in resistance to apoptosis, we divided the samples from the patients into 2 groups: (a) those with normal induction (>1.5-fold) of B55β 24 hours after IL-2 withdrawal and (b) those with defective induction. As shown in Figure 2B, T cells from patients that displayed a normal B55β upregulation underwent apoptosis with identical kinetics as cells from HDs. In sharp contrast, defective B55β induction was associated with marked resistance to CWID. In concordance, a positive correlation between B55β induction at 24 hours and T cell apoptosis at 48 hours was observed (Figure 2C; r = 0.39; P = 0.004).
CWID is impaired in T cells that fail to upregulate B55β. (A) Apoptosis was quantified by flow cytometry in activated T lymphoblasts from patients with AID and HDs, before (basal) and after IL-2 withdrawal (24 and 48 hours). Results are expressed as mean + SEM of annexin V+ DAPI− cells. *P < 0.05, two-tailed t test (HD n = 19; AID n = 59). (B) Apoptosis was compared in T cell subsets from HDs (n = 19) and from patients with AID with normal (n = 30) or defective (n = 25) B55β upregulation at 24 hours of IL-2 w. +P < 0.05 vs. HDs; ++P < 0.01 vs. HDs; ***P < 0.001 vs. AID with normal B55β induction; 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s posttest. (C) Correlation between B55β induction at 24 hours (fold change over basal) and T cell apoptosis at 48 hours (fold change over basal). Spearman’s r = 0.39, and P = 0.004.
Collectively, these results indicate that the correct regulation of B55β during cytokine withdrawal is essential for activated T cells to undergo apoptosis and that defective expression of this molecule is involved in T cell resistance to apoptosis in the setting of AID.
The length of the CAG repeat element of PPP2R2B is normal in patients with AID. In humans, PPP2R2B, the gene that encodes B55β, is located in the long arm of chromosome 5. There are no reports of associations between PPP2R2B genetic variants and AID. However, the gene contains a CAG trinucleotide in its 5′ untranslated region (UTR) that has been reported to affect the abundance of the B55β transcript (12). In fact, expansions of the CAG trinucleotide cause type 12 spinocerebellar ataxia, a rare neurodegenerative disease (13), probably by facilitating expression of B55β in neurons (12, 14). In concordance, shorter alleles with 5 to 7 CAG repeats have been associated with decreased B55β expression and linked to Alzheimer’s disease in Taiwanese patients (15). Therefore, the available data suggest that the length of the CAG repeat element in the 5′ UTR of PPP2R2B modulates the cellular abundance of B55β.
To determine whether the defective expression of B55β in T cells from patients with AID was related to the presence of short CAG repeat alleles, we quantified the number of CAG repeats in HDs and in patients with SLE and RA (Figure 3A). As shown in Figure 3B, the CAG repeat allele frequency was not different between HDs and patients with AID and was similar to the distribution reported in healthy populations (13). Of note, we did not detect any allele with fewer than 9 repeats (Supplemental Table 2). Moreover, when we compared the allele frequency between individuals with normal and defective B55β induction, no differences were observed (Figure 3C). These results indicate that the defects in B55β upregulation in response to IL-2 deprivation are not caused by contraction of the CAG repeat element in patients with systemic AID.
Defects in B55β upregulation are not caused by expansion or contraction of the CAG trinucleotide repeat in PPP2R2B. (A) Schematic representation of the genomic location of the first exon and 5′ untranslated region (UTR) of PPP2R2B. The location of the CAG repeats and of the primers used to quantify the number of repeats in each individual are indicated by an inverted triangle and by arrows, respectively. (B) The distribution of allele length in HDs and patients with SLE and RA is shown (HD n = 20; SLE n = 20; RA n = 21). (C) CAG repeat length in individuals who exhibited normal versus abolished upregulation of B55β during cytokine withdrawal was compared (normal B55β induction n = 21; deficient B55β induction n = 26).
Patients with SLE and RA exhibit high levels of PPP2R2B CpG methylation. PPP2R2B contains a relatively large CpG island (i.e., CpG-rich area of the genome) that encompasses its first exon and 5′ UTR as well as parts of the adjacent first intron (Figure 4A). The regulatory importance of this region is further suggested by the presence of 2 areas that exhibit DNAse I hypersensitivity in human T cells (16). Local CpG methylation has been associated with impaired B55β expression in human colorectal cancer (17). Therefore, we hypothesized that methylation of the PPP2R2B CpG island could inhibit B55β transcription in T cells from patients with AID.
Local CpG DNA methylation is abnormally increased in patients with SLE and RA at the PPP2R2B locus. (A) Schematic representation of PPP2R2B, indicating the location of DNAse I hypersensitivity sites detected in human naive CD4+ T cells and Th1-differentiated CD4+ T cells (16). Also, the location of a large CpG island, composed of 97 CpG dinucleotides, that encompasses the first exon and the 5′ UTR of the gene is shown. (B) Methylation-specific PCR was performed in T cell genomic DNA after bisulfite conversion. Shown are representative results of 3 HDs, 3 patients with SLE, and 3 patients with RA. M, methylated; U, unmethylated. Band density was quantified and the M/U ratio of each sample is shown. (C) Cumulative data from B presented as CpG methylation index: (M band + U band)/M band. HD n = 20; SLE n = 11; RA n = 12. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test.
To test this hypothesis, we performed methylation-specific PCR, in which 2 sets of primers are used to interrogate the local methylation status in bisulfite-converted genomic DNA. One set of primers will amplify only when local cytosines are not methylated (U), and the other will amplify only when cytosines are methylated (M) (17). The ratio of the products of each reaction is an indicator of local methylation. As shown in Figure 4B, DNA from T cells obtained from HDs amplified almost exclusively with primers specific for U DNA. In contrast, bands of variable intensity were detected when DNA from patients with SLE and RA was used, indicating the presence of local cytosine methylation (Figure 4B). Densitometric analysis revealed that DNA from patients with SLE and RA had significantly higher PPP2R2B CpG methylation than HDs (HDs 4.9 ± 1.3 vs. SLE 27.2 ± 4.2; P = 0.0002; HD vs. RA 19.2 ± 5.1; P = 0.02; Figure 4C).
These results indicate that cytosine methylation is increased at the level of a conserved regulatory region of the PPP2R2B gene in patients with AID and suggest that transcription of B55β may be inhibited by this epigenetic mechanism in T cells in the setting of autoimmunity and/or systemic inflammation.
Methylation status of specific CpGs modulates B55β induction in response to cytokine withdrawal. To determine the contribution of individual cytosines to the regulation of B55β expression in patients with AID, we generated 5 sets of primers designed to quantify CpG methylation at the single base level using pyrosequencing (18) (Figure 5A). We observed that in HDs, the level of methylation throughout the CpG island is highly variable, ranging from 5% to 30%. However, the methylation of individual cytosines tended to be consistent among different donors. We compared the methylation of each CpG between HDs and patients with RA and SLE. Methylation of the cytosines within the first amplicon (Amp), the one most proximal to the PPP2R2B first exon, was significantly higher in patients with AID than in HDs (AID vs. HDs, P = 1.5 × 10−5). The differences were also significant when patients with RA (RA vs. HDs, P = 6.5 × 10−6) or SLE were analyzed separately (SLE vs. HD, P = 1.0 × 10−4). No differences were observed in CpG methylation in Amps 2 to 5 between patients with AID and HDs (Figure 5, B and C).
Methylation of discrete cytosines regulates B55β expression in patients with SLE and RA. (A) Schematic representation of PPP2R2B, indicating the location of the CpG dinucleotides examined by pyrosequencing. (B) Methylation (percentage) of specific CpG dinucleotides in T cells isolated from HDs, patients with SLE, and patients with RA (HD n = 9–20; SLE n = 12–20; RA n = 8–20). RA vs. HD, *P < 0.05; SLE vs. HD, +P < 0.05; 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test. (C) Differences in the DNA methylation between patients and controls. The diameters of each circle represent the difference between methylation in HDs and the indicated population. The color of each circle indicates the P value of the corresponding comparison. Large differences were found in Amp 1. In addition, significant methylation differences were found in Amp 2 in patients with RA and in Amp 3 in patients with SLE. (D) Heatmap showing relative methylation (fold change over the mean of HDs) of the CpG dinucleotides from Amp 1. Samples were ordered by unsupervised clustering. The colored boxes on the right side of the heatmap indicate whether the sample corresponds to an HD or a patient; the black and white boxes indicate B55β induction after cytokine withdrawal. (E) Segregation of HDs and patients in clusters 1 and 2 (upper) and segregation of individuals with normal or defective B55β induction (lower). P values were calculated using χ2 test.
Unsupervised hierarchical clustering, considering relative methylation of cytosines within Amps 1–3, segregated the samples into 3 clusters (Supplemental Figure 2). Except for 1, all HDs were included in clusters 1 and 2. In contrast, more than half of patients were allocated to cluster 3 (P < 0.001, Supplemental Figure 2). This clustering, however, did not discriminate between donors with normal and abnormal induction of B55β. Because most differences were observed at the level of Amp 1, we applied unsupervised hierarchical clustering to the samples according to methylation of Amp 1 (Figure 5D). Two clusters were distinguished: cluster 1 with low methylation and cluster 2 with higher methylation. Except for 1, all HDs were assigned to cluster 1 (P < 0.001). In this case, the clustering also segregated samples according to B55β induction (B55β expression 24 hours after IL-2 withdrawal). All but 3 samples from cluster 1 exhibited normal B55β induction following IL-2 deprivation (P < 0.001) (Figure 5, D and E).
Collectively, these data indicate that, in human T cells, local CpG methylation exerts a regulatory influence on PPP2R2B transcription and indicate that under pathological autoimmunity, increased CpG methylation impedes B55β expression.
Systemic inflammation is associated with PPP2R2B hypermethylation. Because defective B55β expression was not linked to a genetic variant, but rather to an epigenetic modification present in roughly 50% of patients with systemic autoimmunity (Figure 1C), we hypothesized that inflammation may influence PPP2R2B transcription by modifying the local epigenetic landscape. To assess the relationship between systemic inflammation and methylation of the PPP2R2B CpG island, we compared the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) between patients with SLE and RA segregated to clusters 1 and 2 (Figure 5D). As shown in Figure 6A, ESR was significantly higher in patients from cluster 2 than in patients from cluster 1 (32.1 ± 8.0 vs. 6.7 ± 1.4, respectively; P = 0.01). In fact, all patients from cluster 1 had normal levels of ESR, whereas 70% of patients from cluster 2 had high ESR (P < 0.001, Fisher’s exact test). Moreover, a significant correlation between ESR and PPP2R2B methylation was observed (Figure 6B; r = 0.758, and P = 0.01). In accordance with these findings, all patients with active RA (Disease Activity Score-28 [DAS28] > 2.6) were included in cluster 2, while the only 2 patients assigned to cluster 1 were in clinical remission at the time of sample collection, with DAS28 scores lower than 2 (Figure 6C) (19). When we analyzed patients with SLE, we could not find any correlations between PPP2R2B methylation and disease activity (assessed by SLE Disease Activity Index [SLEDAI]) (20) or target organ involvement (Figure 6D and data not shown).
Methylation of PPP2R2B is associated with systemic inflammation. (A) Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), at the time of sample collection, in patients assigned to clusters 1 and 2. *P = 0.02, Mann-Whitney U test. (B) Correlation between ESR and CpG methylation (Amp 1) in patients with SLE and RA. Spearman’s r = 0.758, and P = 0.01. (C) Disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28) in patients with RA assigned to clusters 1 and 2. ***P < 0.0001, unpaired two-tailed t test. (D) SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) in patients with SLE from clusters 1 and 2. NS, not significant (unpaired two-tailed t test).
TNF-α promotes PPP2R2B methylation and impairs CWID. The robust relationship between systemic inflammation and PPP2R2B hypermethylation suggested that proinflammatory cytokines may mediate the epigenetic changes observed at the PPP2R2B locus. To explore this possibility, we activated T cells from HDs in the presence of different cytokines (Figure 7A). We chose TNF-α, IFN-α, IL-6, IL-21, and IL-17 because they have been found to be abnormally increased in patients with RA or SLE (21, 22). Compared with T cells activated and expanded with only IL-2, T cells exposed to proinflammatory cytokines, except IL-17, acquired resistance to CWID (Figure 7B). However, qPCR revealed that B55β induction in response to cytokine withdrawal was not affected by IFN-α, IL-6, and IL-17 and was augmented in cells exposed to IL-21. In sharp contrast, TNF-α significantly decreased basal levels of B55β and dampened its upregulation in response to cytokine deprivation (Figure 7C). These results indicate that inflammatory cytokines can promote resistance to apoptosis induced by cytokine withdrawal through different mechanisms and suggest that TNF-α may do so by repressing B55β expression.
TNF-α induces PPP2R2B methylation, abolishes B55β expression, and impairs CWID in healthy T cells. (A) T cells from HDs were activated and expanded in the presence of IL-2 for 10 days. In addition to IL-2, at days 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8, the indicated cytokines (TNF-α, IFN-α, IL-6, IL-21, or IL-17) were added to the culture. At day 10, cells were counted, washed, and replated in the absence of IL-2 and proinflammatory cytokines. (B) Apoptosis (annexin V+ SYTOX Orange−) was quantified before (0 hours) and after IL-2 withdrawal (n = 3–6). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test. (C) Expression of B55β was determined (qPCR) before and after (24 and 48 hours) IL-2 withdrawal. Results were normalized against ACTB (Ct) and then against cells expanded in the presence of IL-2 but in the absence of other cytokines (ΔΔCt). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; 2-way ANOVA. (D) Methylation of the CpG dinucleotides from Amp 1 was determined by pyrosequencing in cells expanded in IL-2 (dotted line) and compared with the CpG DNA methylation of the same cells expanded in the presence of TNF-α or IL-21 (n = 8–11). *P < 0.05, paired two-tailed t test. (E) The relative change in methylation status of single CpG dinucleotides in response to TNF-α and IL-21 is shown (n = 8–11). *P < 0.05, paired two-tailed t test.
Because TNF-α could inhibit B55β transcription by inducing local CpG methylation, we analyzed the methylation of the CpGs from Amp 1 in healthy T cells exposed to TNF-α and IL-21 and compared it with that of T cells expanded in IL-2. As shown in Figure 7, D and E, TNF-α significantly increased PPP2R2B methylation at the level of Amp 1. In contrast, IL-21 had no effect.
PPP2R2B hypermethylation inhibits CTCF binding to its target region. To clarify the mechanism by which PPP2R2B methylation prevents B55β expression in T cells deprived of IL-2, we analyzed the sequence of Amp 1 using the Tomtom motif comparison tool (23) (Figure 8A). A putative binding site for CTCF was detected in Amp 1 (P = 2e−4; Figure 8B). CTCF can act as a transcriptional activator or repressor or as an insulator, depending on the genomic context. Moreover, its binding is affected by local DNA methylation status (24). To determine whether CTFC binds to the PPP2R2B promoter in activated T cells, we performed ChIP-qPCR assays. To this end, we compared local CTCF binding in healthy T cells activated and expanded in the absence or presence of TNF-α. As shown in Figure 8C, CTCF was found bound to the sequence of Amp 1 in activated T cells. However, exposure to TNF-α significantly reduced its binding.
CTCF binding to PPP2R2B is decreased in T cells of patients with AID. (A) Schematic representation of PPP2R2B, indicating the location of the region that was analyzed (Amp 1). (B) CTCF motif present in Amp 1. (C) Quantification (ChIP-qPCR) of CTCF binding at Amp 1 in healthy T cells activated and expanded (basal) versus T cells expanded in the presence of TNF-α, n = 3. (D) CTCF binding to Amp 1 in activated T cells for HDs and patients with AID, n = 4. Relative CTCF enrichment was normalized against basal in C or HDs in D. Results are expressed as mean + SEM. *P < 0.05, paired two-tailed t test.
Next, we compared the binding of CTCF to PPP2R2B in T cells isolated from HDs and patients with AID. As shown in Figure 8D, abundance of CTCF at the PPP2R2B promoter was significantly lower in T cells from patients with RA and SLE than in T cells from HDs. These results suggest that CTCF bound to the PPP2R2B promoter may facilitate B55β expression and that the inflammatory milieu associated with systemic autoimmunity may interfere with its binding through methylation of the PPP2R2B promoter region.
Here, we show that B55β expression is altered in patients with systemic AID and that such defect is associated with resistance to CWID. Additionally, we provide evidence to demonstrate that the impaired upregulation of B55β in response to cytokine deprivation is caused by hypermethylation of specific cytosines located within a regulatory element of PPP2R2B that prevents the binding of CTCF. Finally, we identify systemic inflammation as a factor strongly associated with PPP2R2B hypermethylation and demonstrate that a proinflammatory cytokine is able to induce PPP2R2B epigenetic remodeling and resistance to CWID in healthy T cells. Collectively, our results reveal a gene whose expression is affected by an acquired defect through an epigenetic mechanism, in the setting of systemic autoimmunity. Because failure to remove activated T cells through CWID could contribute to autoimmune pathology, this mechanism represents a vicious cycle through which autoimmune inflammation contributes to its perpetuation (Figure 9).
Mechanism through which PPP2R2B modulates the perpetuation of T cells in patients with AID. (A) After activation and expansion of healthy T cells, levels of IL-2 decrease, promoting clonal contraction by apoptosis. Low IL-2 concentration induces the expression of B55β through the binding of CTCF to a motif located within the CpG island of the PPP2R2B promoter. This mechanism promotes the termination of the immune response. (B) In the context of autoimmunity, where T cells are exposed to a proinflammatory environment, PPP2R2B becomes hypermethylated, preventing the binding of CTCF. This impairs the induction of B55β and apoptosis of T cells when IL-2 levels are low. In consequence, survival of self-reactive activated T cells is facilitated and the autoimmune response is perpetuated.
Current paradigms assume that risk-conferring genetic variants contribute to the development of AID by promoting pathogenic responses when triggered by environmental factors (e.g., viruses) (10). PPP2R2B has not been associated with any AID, and therefore defects in its transcriptional regulation could not be attributed to pathological genetic variants in linkage disequilibrium with common single nucleotide polymorphisms. Because PPP2R2B contains a variable-length CAG repeat element that affects the expression of B55β (12), we sought associations between failed mRNA upregulation and differences in CAG repeat length. These were not found, suggesting that a fixed genetic element did not underlie the defective expression of B55β.
Methylation of cytosines located in CpG islands exerts suppressive effects on the transcription of neighboring genes (25). Because a substantial proportion of the causality of AID remains unexplained by risk loci identified in GWAS, efforts have been made to determine the role of epigenetic variation in autoimmune conditions (26). In fact, altered patterns of DNA methylation have been observed in patients with SLE (27, 28) and RA (29), suggesting that gene expression could be altered in patients with AID in an acquired manner. Inflammation is known to affect the phenotype and behavior of lymphocytes and other immune cells through epigenetic remodeling during acute immune responses induced by infectious agents (30, 31), but little is known about the effects imposed by chronic inflammation in the setting of AID. It is reasonable to assume that the abnormal phenotype exhibited by immune cells from patients with systemic AID could be caused by the superimposition of inflammation-induced epigenetic modifications on disease-associated genetic variants. Here, we have identified a gene that becomes silenced in patients with AID and have shown that the resulting phenotype — resistance to CWID — can be induced in healthy T cells by exposure to the proinflammatory cytokine TNF-α.
We observed differences in the frequency of the B55β induction defect between the 3 systemic AID that we studied. We believe that these do not result from differential epigenetic regulation, but rather reflect qualitative and quantitative differences in the systemic inflammation of patients with SLE, RA, and SS. This argument is based on the following: (a) there are no genetic associations between PPP2R2B and these 3 AID; (b) careful examination of the PPP2R2B CpG methylation status did not reveal disease-specific defects; (c) there is a robust association between systemic inflammation and PPP2R2B methylation; (d) the epigenetic changes TNF-α induced in T cells from HDs were indistinguishable from the findings in T cells from patients with AID.
TNF-α has a well-established pathogenic role in RA, and its therapeutic blockade represents an effective therapy able to decrease disease activity (32) and induce clinical remission (33). In SLE, serum levels of TNF-α have been associated with disease activity (34), and TNF-α signaling has been proposed to contribute to inflammation at the level of specific tissues, in particular the kidney (35). Our results show that methylation at the PPP2R2B locus is associated with presence of AID and with systemic inflammation, manifested by high ESR. In patients with RA, where disease activity is closely associated with systemic inflammation, we observed a robust correlation between DAS28 and PPP2R2B hypermethylation. These data are concordant with the capacity of TNF-α to induce epigenetic changes and repression of B55β transcription. On the other hand, SLE is a heterogeneous disease less strongly associated with inflammation. Although our sample size is limited, we did not observe any correlation between SLE disease activity and PPP2R2B methylation. However, B55β expression and epigenetic landscape were clearly different between patients with SLE and HDs. This suggests that other autoimmunity-associated factors, aside from systemic inflammation, may modulate PPP2R2B transcription. Of note, we found no correlation between the induction of B55β, CWID, or PPP2R2B methylation patterns and demographic or clinical parameters, including age, sex, and medications; however, the number of patients included in this study precludes us from establishing definitive conclusions in this regard.
CTCF is a ubiquitously expressed transcription factor that has been implicated in inflammatory processes. In CD4+ T cells, CTCF regulates the expression of IL-21 (36) and promotes the DNA hydroxymethylation of SOCS1 in cells of patients with SLE (37). In hippocampal neurons, lack of CTCF is associated with the dysregulation of a wide range of inflammation-related genes (e.g., Ccl2, Ccl3, Cd14, Ptgs2, Tlr2), suggesting that this transcription factor curbs neurological inflammation (38). In our study we demonstrated that CTCF binds to the PPP2R2B promoter, allowing the expression of B55β during IL-2 withdrawal. The autoimmune environment limits the binding of CTCF, probably through local DNA methylation, and therefore B55β transcription is impaired. These data support a methylation-sensitive association of CTCF with the PPP2R2B promoter.
Apoptosis represents a fundamental process that controls T cell numbers and activity. Throughout their lifespan, T cells rely on the presence of different stimuli to inhibit apoptosis and survive (39). Resting cells (naive and memory) require low-affinity TCR signaling and the presence of prosurvival cytokines (e.g., IL-7). In contrast, activated T cells are highly susceptible to apoptosis induced through Fas and triggered by cytokine withdrawal (CWID) (40). Here, we show that CWID in activated T cell blasts from HDs and patients with AID is highly dependent on B55β. Freshly isolated human CD4+ T cell subsets (i.e., naive, effector memory, and central memory) express relatively low levels of B55β. In contrast, B55β expression in previously activated CD8+ T cells is higher than in naive CD8+ T cells (Supplemental Figure 3). TCR-mediated activation induces the downregulation of B55β. This may facilitate cell cycle entry or promote the metabolic changes associated with blast transformation. The importance of B55β in regulating T cell quiescence and its role in defining susceptibility to CWID in different T cell subsets is the focus of active investigation.
The relationship between PP2A and apoptosis has been known for a long time (6, 41). PP2A can activate a number of proapoptotic molecules, including FoxO1 (42) and members of the Bcl-2 family (41). However, the mechanisms through which induction of B55β triggers apoptosis is not understood, and, in general, little is known about how specific PP2A holoenzymes affect apoptosis and how different PP2A regulatory subunits modulate this process. B55β is particularly interesting because it is modulated at the transcriptional level. In contrast, most PP2A B subunits are constitutively expressed and regulated at the posttranslational level (7). B55β is downregulated by TCR signaling and its de novo synthesis, is induced by cytokine withdrawal, and is intimately associated with apoptosis (7).
Apoptosis of activated T cells represents an essential process through which the immune system eliminates expanded clones of effector cells that are no longer needed. This allows the immune system to return to its basal state and to rebalance its T cell receptor repertoire (43). The correct termination of immune responses diminishes the risk of immunopathology and autoimmunity that activated T cells entail. CWID is considered the main trigger of T cell death during the contraction phase that curtails clonal expansion, and, accordingly, genetic defects in molecules involved in CWID have been associated with autoimmunity (44). Defects in T cell apoptosis have been documented in patients with SLE (7, 45, 46) and RA (47) through different mechanisms. Our data illustrate a mechanism through which apoptosis resistance can be acquired by activated T cells through the epigenetic remodeling of the PPP2R2B locus. This phenomenon could contribute to the increased abundance of activated T cells observed in SLE and RA (48, 49).
In summary, our work identifies a mechanism through which chronic inflammation affects the expression of a gene that plays a central role during the termination of the immune response. This illustrates how a pathological environment can affect in a noxious manner the behavior of T lymphocytes, amplifying inflammation and contributing to the continuation of pathological autoimmunity.
Patients and HDs. Peripheral blood samples were obtained from HDs (n = 28) and patients with SLE (n = 34), RA (n = 29), and SS (n = 25). The study was approved by the IRB of the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (IRE-1805). All participants signed informed consent forms. Patients with SLE fulfilled the 1997 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria (50), patients with RA fulfilled the 2010 ACR/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria (51), and patients with SS fulfilled the 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria (52). Age- and sex-matched HDs (n = 25) with no family history of AID were recruited as controls. The clinical and demographic characteristics of the study participants are summarized in Supplemental Table 1.
Isolation and expansion of T cells. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were obtained by Ficoll gradient centrifugation. T cells were separated from PBMCs by negative selection using MagniSort Human T cell enrichment kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Purity was higher than 96% in all cases. One million T cells were activated in the presence of plate-bound anti-CD3 (BioXCell, OKT3, 5 μg/ml) and anti-CD28 (BioXCell, clone 9.3, 2.5 μg/ml), in 0.5 ml of RPMI (MilliporeSigma) supplemented with 10% FCS (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and penicillin/streptomycin, at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. Three days later, cells were transferred into a new plate, culture medium was doubled, and IL-2 (Peprotech, 100 U/ml) was added. Every 48 hours, supplemented RPMI and IL-2 were added, until day 10 (Supplemental Figure 1). For T cell activation and expansion in the presence of proinflammatory cytokines, one of the following was included from day 0: IFN-α (BioLegend, 1000 U/ml), IL-6 (Peprotech, 25 ng/ml), IL-21 (Peprotech, 25 ng/ml), TNF-α (Peprotech, 20 ng/ml), or IL-17A (Peprotech, 5 ng/ml).
Apoptosis detection. At day 10 of activation, cells were washed and replated in fresh supplemented RPMI, free of IL-2 (0.5 × 106 cells/ml). Apoptosis was assessed immediately (basal) and after 24 and 48 hours of IL-2 deprivation. Apoptosis was defined as annexin V (BioLegend) binding in the absence of membrane permeability to DAPI or SYTOX Orange (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Apoptotic CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were quantified by flow cytometry (anti-CD4, clone RPA-T4; anti-CD8, clone RPA-T8, both from Tonbo). Data were acquired on an LSR Fortessa cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo (Tree Star, Inc.).
B55β expression. Total RNA was extracted from T cell blasts before (basal) and after (24 and 48 hours) IL-2 withdrawal using TRIzol (Thermo Fisher Scientific). cDNA was generated from 1 μg of RNA using High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). SYBR Green–based qPCR was performed in triplicate using a QuantStudio 7 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). Ct values were normalized against ACTB. Results are expressed as ΔΔCt. Primer sequences are provided in Supplemental Table 3.
DNA extraction and bisulfite conversion. To obtain DNA, 0.8 ml of lysis buffer (protein kinase 1× buffer [0.075 M NaCl and 0.024 M EDTA, pH = 8], 10 mg/ml proteinase K, and 5% SDS) was added to each sample and incubated at 55°C overnight. Samples were centrifuged and supernatants were transferred to a new tube with 0.2 ml of 6 M NaCl added, vortexed, and centrifuged at 12,000 g for 10 minutes. The supernatant was recovered and 0.5 ml of absolute ethanol was added and mixed by inversion. One milliliter of cold 70% ethanol was added to the DNA pellet, which was centrifuged at 12,000 g and allowed to dry. The DNA pellet was resuspended in 0.1 ml of DNAse-free water and stored at –80°C until use. For DNA bisulfite conversion, 1 μg of genomic DNA was processed using EpiTect Bisulfite Kit (Qiagen), following the instructions of the supplier.
Quantification of CAG repeat frequency. Analyses of the PPP2R2B repeat length were performed by fragment length analysis. PCR was performed using previously reported primers (13) provided in Supplemental Table 3. Each reaction was performed with 0.30 ng of DNA using HotStarTaq Master Mix following the instructions of the supplier (Qiagen) and an optimized 58°C touchdown protocol. One microliter of the amplified fragment, 17.6 μl of HiDi formamide (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and 0.4 μl of GeneScan-500LIZ (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific) standard size were mixed, denatured for 5 minutes, and immediately chilled on ice for a few minutes before fragment analysis. Analysis was performed on an AB 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the POP7 polymer. The fluorescent fragments were analyzed automatically using the SizeColler database v.1.1.0 and manually with GeneMapper v.5.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Methylation-specific PCR. Previously described primers (17), specific for the CpG island of the PPP2R2B promoter, were used to amplify bisulfite-modified DNA (Supplemental Table 3). PCR was performed on 30 ng of converted DNA, using HotStarTaq Master Mix (Qiagen). The PCR product was run on a 2% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized in a transilluminator (Bio-Rad). The relative quantification of bands and U and M alleles was done using ImageJ64 (NIH).
Pyrosequencing. Five sets of primers, specific for the CpG island promoter sequence of PPP2R2B, were designed using the PyroMark Assay Design 2.0 program (Qiagen). A PCR reaction (20 μl total) was performed using PyroMark PCR Kit (Qiagen) on 2 μl of bisulfite-converted DNA. Three microliters of each amplicon was analyzed by electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel. The remaining product was mixed with binding buffer and sepharose beads (GE Healthcare) with streptavidin, incubated 15 minutes under constant agitation, washed with 70% ethanol, and denatured with PyroMark denaturing solution. Hybridization was performed with the dilution sequencing probe in PyroMark alignment buffer for 2 minutes at 80°C. The test was performed on a PyroMark Q24 pyrosequencer and analyzed using the Q24 2.0 program (Qiagen). The primer sequences (amplification and sequencing) are provided in Supplemental Table 3.
ChIP. T cells (2.5 × 106) were fixed with 1% formaldehyde and neutralized by adding 0.125 M glycine. The cells were then lysed (25 mM Tris, pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1% SDS, 0.5% deoxycholate, plus protease inhibitor cocktail [Roche]) and sonicated to obtain soluble chromatin with a length of 200–400 bp. ChIP was performed using an anti-CTCF antibody (07-729, MilliporeSigma). Immunoprecipitated chromatin was incubated with proteinase K (2 mg/ml) and RNAse A (5 mg/ml) for 2 hours at 37°C followed by 65°C overnight. Then, chromatin was cleaned and concentrated using ChIP DNA Clean & Concentrator kit (D5205, Zymo Research). Eluted DNA was subjected to reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) amplification. The primer sequences are provided in Supplemental Table 3.
Statistics. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Mann-Whitney U test or Student’s t test (2 tailed) were used for comparisons between groups. One-way ANOVA was used to determine statistical differences among 3 groups and 2-way ANOVA between groups with more than 2 variables; statistical test correction was applied as indicated in the figure legends. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant.
Study approval. This study was approved by the IRB of the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (INCMNSZ; IRE-1805). All participants signed informed consent forms.
IKMS, NRR, OMM, JAV, FR, and JCC conceived the study; IKMS, BESH, YS, NRR, OMM, FR, and JCC developed the methodology; IKMS, BESH, YS, MEV, MITZ, HBGG, and GHM performed the experiments; BESH, JAV, OMM, FR, and JCC provided the resources. IKMS and JCC wrote the original draft; IKMS, OMM, JAV, FR, and JCC reviewed and edited the manuscript; BESH, JAV, and JCC acquired funding; FR and JCC supervised the study.
We thank the patients and the clinicians from the Department of Immunology and Rheumatology (INCMNSZ) for their participation in this study. We thank Araceli Martínez and Martha E. Baños (INCMNSZ) for their help procuring blood samples, Melitón Zúñiga (INCMNSZ) for his invaluable help in maintaining a clean and organized lab, Armando Gamboa from the Department of Pathology (INCMNSZ) for his help with pyrosequencing, José Jiram Torres-Ruiz (INCMNSZ) for his help in evaluating clinical scores, and Victor M. Ortiz-Ortega (INCMNSZ) for his help with DNA sonication. This work was supported by grants from the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Mexico (IFC 2015-549; FOSISS 2014-233667; FOSSIS 2016-272118; and CB 2015-256752).
Address correspondence to: José C. Crispín or Florencia Rosetti, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga #15, Mexico City, Mexico 14080. Phone: 5255.5487.0900 ext. 2610; Email: carlos.crispina@incmnsz.mx (JCC); florencia.rosettis@incmnsz.mx (FR).
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Copyright: © 2019 American Society for Clinical Investigation
Reference information: JCI Insight. 2019;4(16):e126457. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.126457.