Submit a comment
Abstract
Cerebral endothelial cell (EC) injury and blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability contribute to neuronal injury in acute neurological disease states. Preclinical experiments have used animal models to study this phenomenon, yet the response of human cerebral ECs to BBB disruption remains unclear. In our phase I clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04528680), we used low-intensity pulsed ultrasound with microbubbles (LIPU/MB) to induce transient BBB disruption of peritumoral brain in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. We found radiographic evidence that BBB integrity was mostly restored within 1 hour of this procedure. Using single-cell RNA sequencing and transmission electron microscopy, we analyzed the acute response of human brain ECs to ultrasound-mediated BBB disruption. Our analysis revealed distinct EC gene expression changes after LIPU/MB, particularly in genes related to neurovascular barrier function and structure, including changes to genes involved in the basement membrane, EC cytoskeleton, and junction complexes, as well as caveolar transcytosis and various solute transporters. Ultrastructural analysis showed that LIPU/MB led to a decrease in luminal caveolae, the emergence of cytoplasmic vacuoles, and the disruption of the basement membrane and tight junctions, among other things. These findings suggested that acute BBB disruption by LIPU/MB led to specific transcriptional and ultrastructural changes and could represent a conserved mechanism of BBB repair after neurovascular injury in humans.
Authors
Andrew Gould, Yu Luan, Ye Hou, Farida V. Korobova, Li Chen, Victor A. Arrieta, Christina Amidei, Rachel Ward, Cristal Gomez, Brandyn Castro, Karl Habashy, Daniel Zhang, Mark Youngblood, Crismita Dmello, John Bebawy, Guillaume Bouchoux, Roger Stupp, Michael Canney, Feng Yue, M. Luisa Iruela-Arispe, Adam M. Sonabend
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
