Submit a comment
Abstract
The impact of remdesivir on SARS-CoV-2 diversity and evolution in vivo has remained unclear. In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, we assessed SARS-CoV-2 diversification and diversity over time in a cohort of hospitalized patients who did or did not receive remdesivir. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on 98 paired specimens collected from 49 patients before and after remdesivir administration. The genetic divergence between paired specimens was not significantly different in this cohort compared with that in a control group of patients who did not receive the drug. However, when we focused on minority variants, several positions showed preferential diversification after remdesivir treatment, some of which were associated with specific variants of concern. Most notably, remdesivir administration resulted in strong selection for a nonsynonymous mutation in nsp12, G671S, previously associated with enhanced viral fitness. This same mutation was found to be enriched in a second cohort of 143 inpatients with specimens collected after remdesivir administration compared with controls. Only one other mutation previously implicated in remdesivir resistance (nsp12:V792I) was found to be preferentially selected for after remdesivir administration. These data suggest that SARS-CoV-2 variants with enhanced replicative fitness may be selected for in the presence of antiviral therapy as an indirect means to overcome this selective pressure.
Authors
Ted Ling-Hu, Lacy M. Simons, Estefany Rios-Guzman, Alexandre Machado Carvalho, Maria Francesca R. Agnes, Arghavan Alisoltanidehkordi, Egon A. Ozer, Ramon Lorenzo-Redondo, Judd F. Hultquist
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
