This study lays the groundwork for future lentivirus-mediated gene therapy in patients with Diamond Blackfan anemia (DBA) caused by mutations in ribosomal protein S19 (RPS19), showing evidence of a new safe and effective therapy. The data show that, unlike patients with Fanconi anemia (FA), the hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) reservoir of patients with DBA was not significantly reduced, suggesting that collection of these cells should not constitute a remarkable restriction for DBA gene therapy. Subsequently, 2 clinically applicable lentiviral vectors were developed. In the former lentiviral vector, PGK.CoRPS19 LV, a codon-optimized version of RPS19 was driven by the phosphoglycerate kinase promoter (PGK) already used in different gene therapy trials, including FA gene therapy. In the latter one, EF1α.CoRPS19 LV, RPS19 expression was driven by the elongation factor alpha short promoter, EF1α(s). Preclinical experiments showed that transduction of DBA patient CD34+ cells with the PGK.CoRPS19 LV restored erythroid differentiation, and demonstrated the long-term repopulating properties of corrected DBA CD34+ cells, providing evidence of improved erythroid maturation. Concomitantly, long-term restoration of ribosomal biogenesis was verified using a potentially novel method applicable to patients’ blood cells, based on ribosomal RNA methylation analyses. Finally, in vivo safety studies and proviral insertion site analyses showed that lentivirus-mediated gene therapy was nontoxic.
Yari Giménez, Manuel Palacios, Rebeca Sánchez-Domínguez, Christiane Zorbas, Jorge Peral, Alexander Puzik, Laura Ugalde, Omaira Alberquilla, Mariela Villanueva, Paula Río, Eva Gálvez, Lydie Da Costa, Marion Strullu, Albert Catala, Anna Ruiz-Llobet, Jose Carlos Segovia, Julián Sevilla, Brigitte Strahm, Charlotte M. Niemeyer, Cristina Beléndez, Thierry Leblanc, Denis L.J. Lafontaine, Juan Bueren, Susana Navarro
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.