Submit a comment
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2020;5(16):e139377. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.139377.
Abstract
The naive heart harbors a population of intravascular B cells that make close contact with the cardiac microvasculature. However, the timing of their appearance and their organ specificity remain unknown. To address this knowledge gap, we performed a systematic analysis of B cells isolated from the myocardium and other organs, from embryonic life to adulthood. We found that the phenotype of myocardial B cells changed dynamically during development. While neonatal heart B cells were mostly CD11b+ and CD11b– CD21–CD23–, adult B cells were predominantly CD11b–CD21+CD23+. Histological analysis and intravital microscopy of lung and liver showed that organ-associated B cells in contact with the microvascular endothelium were not specific to the heart. Flow cytometric analysis of perfused hearts, livers, lungs, and spleen showed that the dynamic changes in B cell subpopulations observed in the heart during development mirrored changes observed in the other organs. Single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) analysis of B cells showed that myocardial B cells were part of a larger population of organ-associated B cells that had a distinct transcriptional profile. These findings broaden our understanding of the biology of myocardial-associated B cells and suggest that current models of the dynamics of naive B cells during development are incomplete.
Authors
Cibele Rocha-Resende, Wei Yang, Wenjun Li, Daniel Kreisel, Luigi Adamo, Douglas L. Mann
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
