Research ArticleBone biology Free access | 10.1172/jci.insight.95512
1Ion Channel Research Unit, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
2Cardiovascular Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and
4Department of Lab Animal Resources & Rodent Surgical and Genetic Services, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
5Arthritis and Tissue Degeneration Program, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
7Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Matthew J. Hilton, 308 Research Drive, LSRC Building Room B321C, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA. Phone: 919.613.9761; Email: matthew.hilton@dm.duke.edu. Or to: Geoffrey S. Pitt, 413 East 69th Street, Belfer Research Building Room 502, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York 10021, USA. Phone: 646.962.7641; Email: geoffrey.pitt@med.cornell.edu.
Find articles by Cao, C. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Ion Channel Research Unit, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
2Cardiovascular Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and
4Department of Lab Animal Resources & Rodent Surgical and Genetic Services, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
5Arthritis and Tissue Degeneration Program, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
7Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Matthew J. Hilton, 308 Research Drive, LSRC Building Room B321C, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA. Phone: 919.613.9761; Email: matthew.hilton@dm.duke.edu. Or to: Geoffrey S. Pitt, 413 East 69th Street, Belfer Research Building Room 502, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York 10021, USA. Phone: 646.962.7641; Email: geoffrey.pitt@med.cornell.edu.
Find articles by Ren, Y. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
1Ion Channel Research Unit, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
2Cardiovascular Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and
4Department of Lab Animal Resources & Rodent Surgical and Genetic Services, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
5Arthritis and Tissue Degeneration Program, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
7Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Matthew J. Hilton, 308 Research Drive, LSRC Building Room B321C, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA. Phone: 919.613.9761; Email: matthew.hilton@dm.duke.edu. Or to: Geoffrey S. Pitt, 413 East 69th Street, Belfer Research Building Room 502, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York 10021, USA. Phone: 646.962.7641; Email: geoffrey.pitt@med.cornell.edu.
Find articles by Barnett, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Ion Channel Research Unit, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
2Cardiovascular Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and
4Department of Lab Animal Resources & Rodent Surgical and Genetic Services, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
5Arthritis and Tissue Degeneration Program, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
7Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Matthew J. Hilton, 308 Research Drive, LSRC Building Room B321C, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA. Phone: 919.613.9761; Email: matthew.hilton@dm.duke.edu. Or to: Geoffrey S. Pitt, 413 East 69th Street, Belfer Research Building Room 502, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York 10021, USA. Phone: 646.962.7641; Email: geoffrey.pitt@med.cornell.edu.
Find articles by Mirando, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Ion Channel Research Unit, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
2Cardiovascular Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and
4Department of Lab Animal Resources & Rodent Surgical and Genetic Services, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
5Arthritis and Tissue Degeneration Program, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
7Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Matthew J. Hilton, 308 Research Drive, LSRC Building Room B321C, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA. Phone: 919.613.9761; Email: matthew.hilton@dm.duke.edu. Or to: Geoffrey S. Pitt, 413 East 69th Street, Belfer Research Building Room 502, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York 10021, USA. Phone: 646.962.7641; Email: geoffrey.pitt@med.cornell.edu.
Find articles by Rouse, D. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Ion Channel Research Unit, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
2Cardiovascular Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and
4Department of Lab Animal Resources & Rodent Surgical and Genetic Services, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
5Arthritis and Tissue Degeneration Program, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
7Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Matthew J. Hilton, 308 Research Drive, LSRC Building Room B321C, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA. Phone: 919.613.9761; Email: matthew.hilton@dm.duke.edu. Or to: Geoffrey S. Pitt, 413 East 69th Street, Belfer Research Building Room 502, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York 10021, USA. Phone: 646.962.7641; Email: geoffrey.pitt@med.cornell.edu.
Find articles by Mun, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Ion Channel Research Unit, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
2Cardiovascular Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and
4Department of Lab Animal Resources & Rodent Surgical and Genetic Services, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
5Arthritis and Tissue Degeneration Program, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
7Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Matthew J. Hilton, 308 Research Drive, LSRC Building Room B321C, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA. Phone: 919.613.9761; Email: matthew.hilton@dm.duke.edu. Or to: Geoffrey S. Pitt, 413 East 69th Street, Belfer Research Building Room 502, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York 10021, USA. Phone: 646.962.7641; Email: geoffrey.pitt@med.cornell.edu.
Find articles by Park-Min, K. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Ion Channel Research Unit, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
2Cardiovascular Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and
4Department of Lab Animal Resources & Rodent Surgical and Genetic Services, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
5Arthritis and Tissue Degeneration Program, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
7Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Matthew J. Hilton, 308 Research Drive, LSRC Building Room B321C, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA. Phone: 919.613.9761; Email: matthew.hilton@dm.duke.edu. Or to: Geoffrey S. Pitt, 413 East 69th Street, Belfer Research Building Room 502, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York 10021, USA. Phone: 646.962.7641; Email: geoffrey.pitt@med.cornell.edu.
Find articles by McNulty, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Ion Channel Research Unit, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
2Cardiovascular Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and
4Department of Lab Animal Resources & Rodent Surgical and Genetic Services, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
5Arthritis and Tissue Degeneration Program, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
7Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Matthew J. Hilton, 308 Research Drive, LSRC Building Room B321C, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA. Phone: 919.613.9761; Email: matthew.hilton@dm.duke.edu. Or to: Geoffrey S. Pitt, 413 East 69th Street, Belfer Research Building Room 502, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York 10021, USA. Phone: 646.962.7641; Email: geoffrey.pitt@med.cornell.edu.
Find articles by Guilak, F. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
1Ion Channel Research Unit, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
2Cardiovascular Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and
4Department of Lab Animal Resources & Rodent Surgical and Genetic Services, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
5Arthritis and Tissue Degeneration Program, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
7Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Matthew J. Hilton, 308 Research Drive, LSRC Building Room B321C, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA. Phone: 919.613.9761; Email: matthew.hilton@dm.duke.edu. Or to: Geoffrey S. Pitt, 413 East 69th Street, Belfer Research Building Room 502, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York 10021, USA. Phone: 646.962.7641; Email: geoffrey.pitt@med.cornell.edu.
Find articles by Karner, C. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Ion Channel Research Unit, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
2Cardiovascular Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and
4Department of Lab Animal Resources & Rodent Surgical and Genetic Services, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
5Arthritis and Tissue Degeneration Program, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
7Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Matthew J. Hilton, 308 Research Drive, LSRC Building Room B321C, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA. Phone: 919.613.9761; Email: matthew.hilton@dm.duke.edu. Or to: Geoffrey S. Pitt, 413 East 69th Street, Belfer Research Building Room 502, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York 10021, USA. Phone: 646.962.7641; Email: geoffrey.pitt@med.cornell.edu.
Find articles by Hilton, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Ion Channel Research Unit, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
2Cardiovascular Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and
4Department of Lab Animal Resources & Rodent Surgical and Genetic Services, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
5Arthritis and Tissue Degeneration Program, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
7Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Matthew J. Hilton, 308 Research Drive, LSRC Building Room B321C, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA. Phone: 919.613.9761; Email: matthew.hilton@dm.duke.edu. Or to: Geoffrey S. Pitt, 413 East 69th Street, Belfer Research Building Room 502, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York 10021, USA. Phone: 646.962.7641; Email: geoffrey.pitt@med.cornell.edu.
Find articles by Pitt, G. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
Published November 16, 2017 - More info
While the prevalence of osteoporosis is growing rapidly with population aging, therapeutic options remain limited. Here, we identify potentially novel roles for CaV1.2 L-type voltage–gated Ca2+ channels in osteogenesis and exploit a transgenic gain-of-function mutant CaV1.2 to stem bone loss in ovariectomized female mice. We show that endogenous CaV1.2 is expressed in developing bone within proliferating chondrocytes and osteoblasts. Using primary BM stromal cell (BMSC) cultures, we found that Ca2+ influx through CaV1.2 activates osteogenic transcriptional programs and promotes mineralization. We used Prx1-, Col2a1-, or Col1a1-Cre drivers to express an inactivation-deficient CaV1.2 mutant in chondrogenic and/or osteogenic precursors in vivo and found that the resulting increased Ca2+ influx markedly thickened bone not only by promoting osteogenesis, but also by inhibiting osteoclast activity through increased osteoprotegerin secretion from osteoblasts. Activating the CaV1.2 mutant in osteoblasts at the time of ovariectomy stemmed bone loss. Together, these data highlight roles for CaV1.2 in bone and demonstrate the potential dual anabolic and anticatabolic therapeutic actions of tissue-specific CaV1.2 activation in osteoblasts.
CaV1.2, an L-type voltage–gated Ca2+ channel, plays essential roles in many excitable cells, including neurons, smooth and cardiac muscle cells, and endocrine cells (1). Upon membrane depolarization, Ca2+ influx through the activated CaV1.2 channel triggers a wide range of physiological processes, such as excitation-contraction coupling in cardiac muscle cells, graded contraction in smooth muscle cells of the vasculature and gut, hormone secretion in endocrine tissue, postsynaptic responses in various neurons, and activation of gene expression paradigms across a variety of tissues. Common to all of these examples is that the excitable cells in which they occur support frequent and dynamic changes in membrane potential that facilitate activation of the voltage-gated CaV1.2 channel. In contrast, roles for CaV1.2 signaling in nonexcitable cells are not well understood, but a gain-of-function mutation (G406R) in the human CACNA1C gene, encoding the pore-forming α1C subunit of CaV1.2, causes Timothy syndrome (TS) (2) and reveals prominent but previously unappreciated roles for CaV1.2 in nonexcitable tissue (3).
TS is a multisystem disorder marked by life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias and soft-tissue syndactyly. The G406R mutation in CaV1.2 that causes TS reduces voltage-dependent inactivation, thus impairing channel closure and allowing more Ca2+ influx into the cell. This increased Ca2+ entry, and consequent delay of membrane repolarization, provides a clear rationale for the cardiac arrhythmias. How CaV1.2 participates in limb development and specifically why the mutant channel causes syndactyly, however, are not known. Some other variably penetrant features of TS, such as craniofacial and dental abnormalities and delayed hair development, demonstrate that a broad array of tissues are affected by aberrant Ca2+ influx through CaV1.2 and reveal other unexpected but critical roles of CaV1.2 in nonexcitable tissues.
In a previous study, increased Ca2+ influx through the TS-mutant CaV1.2 (CaV1.2TS) channel in mandibular chondrocytes was shown in zebrafish and mouse models to recapitulate the macrognathia observed in TS patients (4). As the mandible is unique among skeletal elements in the skull to derive from endochondral ossification, we hypothesized that CaV1.2 may influence bone development more broadly. Indeed, while plasma membranes of bone cells (e.g., osteoblasts) have not been shown to prominently display the voltage-dependent changes that control CaV1.2 activity in excitable tissue, earlier reports identified functional L-type Ca2+ channels, mainly CaV1.2, in human mesenchymal stem cells from BM cultured in osteogenic medium (5), in osteosarcoma cell lines (6), and in a rat osteoblast-like cell line (7). Further, CaV1.2 was shown in an osteosarcoma cell line to be the primary site for Ca2+ influx, which promoted osteoblast differentiation (8, 9). In addition, CaV1.2 expression and channel activity were regulated by calciotropic hormones such as 1,25(OH)2D3 (8, 10) and parathyroid hormone (11), suggesting a functional contribution of CaV1.2 L-type Ca2+ channel to bone development. More recently, a mutation in CACNA1C causing reduced current density through CaV1.2 was associated with osteopenia (12).
Because CaV1.2 is a well-characterized pharmacological target, for which antagonists are widely used to treat hypertension, angina, and cardiac arrhythmias, we set out to explore CaV1.2 contributions to bone development and the consequent therapeutic potential of modulating CaV1.2 activity in bone. We characterized the expression profile of CaV1.2 during bone development and exploited CaV1.2TS transgenic mouse models to show that the gain-of-function CaV1.2TS promotes bone formation both during development and postnatally. We provide evidence that the augmented bone mass results from increased osteoblast differentiation and decreased osteoclast formation. With this foundation, we then demonstrated that activation of CaV1.2TS expression in osteoblasts reduced bone loss in an ovariectomy-induced (OVX-induced) osteoporosis mouse model.
CaV1.2 is expressed during mouse bone development. To determine whether CaV1.2 contributes to bone development, we first examined endogenous CaV1.2 expression in developing limbs by using a CaV1.2 reporter mouse (B6.129P2-Cacna1ctm1Dgen/J, CaV1.2+/lacZ) in which a lacZ cassette (with a nuclear localization signal) disrupts the Cacna1c locus. While complete KO of Cacna1c is embryonic lethal due to inadequate cardiac output, CaV1.2+/– mice are viable and fertile without obvious differences in any aspect of development (13) and only minor differences in morphology (4). The lacZ expression in CaV1.2+/lacZ mice thereby provides an accurate picture of the temporospatial CaV1.2 expression pattern during development and definitive identification of CaV1.2-expressing cells. We performed X-gal staining on frozen sections of long bones from early postnatal mice (P10), in which we observed strong staining in the resting and proliferating chondrocytes, but we did not detect staining in the hypertrophic chondrocytes (Figure 1, A–C). Expression was also strong in the perichondrium/periosteum (Figure 1, A and D), and extensive staining appeared in the lining cells of trabecular bones underneath the growth plate (Figure 1, A and E). At a later postnatal stage (P18), we also observed significant staining in the endosteum (Figure 1F). This staining pattern suggested that at least some of CaV1.2 resides in osteoblast progenitors, which we further tested by examining expression in primary BM stromal cells (BMSCs) isolated from adult CaV1.2+/lacZ mice. CaV1.2 expression as indicated by lacZ staining in these BMSCs (Figure 1G) — along with previously reported RNA sequencing data showing CaV1.2 expression in osteoblasts and osteoblast progenitors (14), but not in the osteoclast lineage (15) — suggest important roles for CaV1.2 in skeletogenesis.
Endogenous CaV1.2 is expressed during mouse endochondral ossification and in BMSCs, and pharmacological inhibition of CaV1.2 channel activity decreases osteoblast differentiation. (A) LacZ staining of CaV1.2+/lacZ femur at P10 at 5× magnification. (B–E) Boxed regions shown in A indicate the presence of lacZ+ cells in the resting (B) and proliferating (C) chondrocytes, in the perichondrium/periosteum (D), and in the lining cells of trabecular bones (E). (F) LacZ staining of CaV1.2+/lacZ tibia at P18, showing lacZ staining in the endosteum. (G) LacZ staining of CaV1.2+/lacZ BMSCs cultured for 6 days on coverslip in α-MEM (without ascorbic acid) plus 15% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. (H) von Kossa staining of WT BMSCs after 14 days of differentiation in the presence of the L-type Ca2+ channel–specific blockers diltiazem (10 μM) or nifedipine (10 μM), n ≥ 3. (I) Expression analysis of osteoblast markers by quantitative PCR of WT BMSCs after 9 days of differentiation in the absence and presence of diltiazem (10 μM). Bar values are normalized means (normalized to H2O group) ± SD (n = 3, **P < 0.01). Statistical analysis was performed by 2-tailed unpaired t test.
Pharmacological inhibition of CaV1.2 channel activity decreased osteoblast differentiation. Based on the above expression patterns, we next asked whether Ca2+ influx through endogenous CaV1.2 affected osteoblast differentiation. We performed an in vitro osteogenesis assay with BMSCs in the absence and presence of 2 different specific L-type Ca2+ channel blockers, diltiazem and nifedipine, applied to the cultures 12 hours before adding differentiation media. Cells were then cultured with the channel blocker or their diluents throughout the differentiation process. After 14 days of culture in osteogenic media, BMSCs treated with a channel blocker displayed substantially reduced mineralized nodule formation, as shown by von Kossa staining (Figure 1H). Quantitative PCR (qPCR) revealed that, in cells treated with the channel blocker, there was a marked decrease in transcripts of several osteoblast markers, including Alpl, Ibsp, and Bglap (Figure 1I). Together, these data suggest that Ca2+ signaling through endogenous CaV1.2 regulates osteogenesis.
Increased Ca2+ influx through CaV1.2 promotes bone formation in vivo. To explore whether Ca2+ signaling through CaV1.2 in developing bone affects skeletogenesis in vivo, we exploited a transgenic mouse line in which a silenced TS mutant CaV1.2 Cacna1c cDNA (CaV1.2TS) or a WT Cacna1c cDNA (CaV1.2WT) as a control had been knocked into the Rosa26 locus (Rosa26-CaV1.2TS and Rosa26-CaV1.2WT, respectively). Expression of these cDNAs can be activated in a tissue-specific manner upon Cre recombinase–mediated excision of an upstream stop codon (16). We activated CaV1.2TS expression with Prx1-Cre targeting early mesenchymal stem cells (17), Col2a1-Cre targeting osteochondral progenitors (18), or Col1a1-Cre targeting more mature osteoblast-lineage cells (19). At 6 weeks of age, mice in which CaV1.2TS expression was driven by Prx1-Cre showed profoundly increased bone mass in the appendicular skeleton and in the skull but not the axial skeleton — consistent with the restricted expression pattern of Prx1 (20) — as detected by radiography and μCT when compared with their Cre– control littermates (Figure 2, A, C, and E). The combined distal femur cortical and trabecular bone volume (BV/TV) in Prx1-Cre;CaV1.2TS mice was increased by > 2-fold compared with controls at 6 weeks of age (Figure 2D). CaV1.2TS expression driven by either Col2a1-Cre or Col1a1-Cre produced an increased bone mass phenotype similar to that observed in Prx1-Cre;CaV1.2TS mice (Supplemental Figure 1, A, B, D and E; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.95512DS1). Compared with the appendicular-restricted phenotype in the Prx1-Cre;CaV1.2TS mice, we observed increased bone mass in both the appendicular and axial skeleton (data not shown) in the Col2a1-Cre;CaV1.2TS and Col1a1-Cre;CaV1.2TS mice, however. These results are consistent with the broad expression pattern of Col2a1-Cre and Col1a1-Cre throughout the skeleton. The high bone mass phenotype persisted at least to 12 months of age (data not shown) and resulted in almost complete obliteration of the BM cavity in long bones. Consistent with obliteration of the BM cavity and predicted extramedullary hematopoiesis, the CaV1.2TS mutant mice exhibited marked splenomegaly (Supplemental Figure 2). In contrast, mice expressing CaV1.2WT from Rosa26 driven by these 3 Cre lines displayed no difference in bone mass compared with their Cre– littermate controls, as shown by radiography or μCT (Figure 2B and Supplemental Figure 1, G–J). This latter observation suggests that expression of the noninactivating CaV1.2TS mutant channel — not just overexpression of CaV1.2 — promotes increased bone mass in vivo. Alcian Blue Hematoxylin/Orange G (ABH/OG) staining confirmed that both primary and secondary ossification centers of CaV1.2TS mutant mice were occupied with excessive bone (Figure 2F and Supplemental Figure 1, C and F). Extensive Alcian Blue–stained cartilage remnant was detected in the primary spongiosa under the growth plate of mutant mice (Figure 2F and Supplemental Figure 1, C and F). Moreover, the mutant bones lacked sculpting (Figure 2C and Supplemental Figure 1, A and D), indicating osteoclast defects (see below for further analysis).
Expression of the CaV1.2TS channel increases bone mass in vivo. (A and B) Radiographs of the whole bodies of 6-week-old Cre–;CaV1.2TS (control) and Prx1-Cre;CaV1.2TS (mutant) littermate mice. (C) μCT 3-D reconstruction images of the femurs of 6-week-old Cre–;CaV1.2TS (control, Prx1-) and Prx1-Cre;CaV1.2TS (mutant, Prx1+) littermate mice. (D) μCT analysis of BV/TV obtained from 800 slices (10-μm thick; 8 mm total) from the distal femur, a region indicated by the dashed lines in C. Bar values are means ± SD (n ≥ 3, **P < 0.01). (E) μCT 3-D reconstruction images of skulls of 6-week-old Cre–;CaV1.2TS and Prx1-Cre;CaV1.2TS littermate mice. (F) Alcian blue Hematoxylin/Orange G (ABH/OG) staining of longitudinal femur sections from 6-week-old Cre–;CaV1.2TS and Prx1-Cre;CaV1.2TS littermate mice at 1.25× magnification. Shown to the right of the main images are 10× magnifications of the secondary ossification center (top), primary spongiosa (middle), and marrow region (bottom). (G) ABH/OG staining of longitudinal femur sections from Cre–;CaV1.2TS and Prx1-Cre;CaV1.2TS littermate mice at P0. (H) Analysis of bone collar thickness (B. collar Th) and percentage of bone area over tissue area (B. Ar/T. Ar) of femur diaphysis from Cre–;CaV1.2TS and Prx1-Cre;CaV1.2TS littermate mice at P0. Bar values are means ± SD (n = 3. **P < 0.01). Statistical analysis was performed by 2-tailed unpaired t test.
Since the Prx1-Cre driver activated CaV1.2TS expression during skeletal development, we next assessed whether we were able to detect the increase in bone mass in embryonic stage. Indeed, at P0, histology confirmed that Prx1-Cre;CaV1.2TS femurs possessed a thicker bone collar and higher bone mass in the presumptive marrow cavity compared with littermate controls (Figure 2, G and H).
Increased Ca2+ influx through CaV1.2 promotes osteoblast differentiation. To investigate further whether enhanced osteoblast function contributed to the increased bone mass, we performed dynamic histomorphometric analysis using calcein and alizarin red double labeling. Extensive green and red labeling was observed in the Prx1-Cre;CaV1.2TS mutant femur, in stark contrast to that in the control, indicating more active bone formation in CaV1.2TS-expressing mice (Figure 3, A and B). A similar result was observed in Col2a-Cre;CaV1.2TS mutant femurs with calcein double labeling (Supplemental Figure 3, A and B).
CaV1.2TS channel promotes osteoblast differentiation. (A) Representative images of calcein and alizarin red double labeling in femurs from 6-week-old control Cre–;CaV1.2TS and Prx1-Cre;CaV1.2TS littermate mice. (B) Analysis of the percentage of double-labeling area over tissue area underneath the growth plate (Dl. Ar/T. Ar) in control Cre–;CaV1.2TS (Ctrl) and Prx1-Cre;CaV1.2TS (Prx1-TS) littermate mice. Bar values are means ± SD (n = 3. *P < 0.05). (C) von Kossa staining of control (Ad-GFP) versus CaV1.2TS-expressing (Ad-Cre) BMSCs after 10 days of differentiation, n ≥ 3. (D) Expression analysis by quantitative PCR of control (Ad-GFP) versus CaV1.2TS-expressing (Ad-Cre) BMSCs at D0 (6 hours of differentiation) or after 2, 10 and 17 days (D2, D10, and D17) of differentiation. Bar values are means ± SD (n = 3. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01). Statistical analysis was performed by 2-tailed unpaired t test, and a P value less than 0.05 was considered significant.
To test the role of CaV1.2TS in osteogenesis directly, we performed osteoblast differentiation assays in vitro by isolating BMSCs from Rosa26-CaV1.2TS adult mice and infecting the cultured cells with adenovirus expressing either Cre recombinase (to remove the floxed STOP codon) or GFP as a control. von Kossa staining revealed widespread formation of mineralized nodules in CaV1.2TS expressing (infected with Cre) BMSCs after 10 days of differentiation, a time when there was limited mineralization in the control (infected with GFP) BMSCs (Figure 3C). We explored the mechanisms driving the accelerated mineralization in BMSCs expressing CaV1.2TS with qPCR. This revealed markedly upregulated mRNA expression of 2 master osteogenic transcription factors, Runx2 and Sp7, in CaV1.2TS-expressing BMSCs (Cre-infected) compared with control cells (GFP-infected) 48 hours after exposure to osteogenic differentiation media (Figure 3D). The increase persisted for the ensuing 15 days. Similarly, expression of Alpl, Ibsp, and Bglap transcripts was also elevated within 48 hours of differentiation in CaV1.2TS-expressing BMSCs and remained significantly higher (compared with control) over the following 15 days (Figure 3D). Thus, these results indicate that expression of CaV1.2TS accelerated osteoblast differentiation of BMSCs in vitro.
CaV1.2TS channel blocks osteoclast differentiation. The lack of sculpting of CaV1.2TS mutant long bones and the excessive cartilage remnant in the mutant primary spongiosa prompted us to hypothesize that osteoclast defects also contributed to the increased bone mass in CaV1.2TS mutant bones. To test this hypothesis, we performed tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining on femurs from 6-week-old mice. We observed substantially fewer osteoclasts in CaV1.2TS-expressing mice compared with littermate controls (Figure 4A and Supplemental Figure 3C). Quantitative analysis showed that osteoclast number per tissue area (Oc. N/T. Ar) was decreased by 55% and osteoclast area per tissue area (Oc. Ar/T. Ar) decreased by 54% in Prx1-Cre;CaV1.2TS mice (Figure 4B). A similar phenotype was also observed in Col2a1-Cre;CaV1.2TS mice (Supplemental Figure 3, D and E), indicating reduced osteoclastogenesis in CaV1.2TS mutant mice. As Prx1-Cre, Col2a1-Cre, and Col1a1-Cre do not target the osteoclast lineage, we hypothesize that CaV1.2TS interfered with osteoblast-mediated osteoclastogenesis through the osteoprotegerin/RANKL (OPG/RANKL) pathway. We tested this by measuring serum OPG, an inhibitor of RANKL, and observed a 34% increase of OPG in Prx1-Cre;CaV1.2TS and a 27% increase in Col2a1-Cre;CaV1.2TS transgenic mice (Figure 4C and Supplemental Figure 3C). We further examined whether CaV1.2TS affects the Rankl/Opg (Tnfs11/Tnfrsf11b) mRNA expression ratio in primary BMSC cultures after activating CaV1.2TS expression and found — consistent with the in vivo data — a 61% decrease in CaV1.2TS-expressing BMSCs (Figure 4D). Additionally, we cocultured BM-derived macrophages (BMMs) with CaV1.2TS-expressing or WT calvarial osteoblasts in the presence of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and prostaglandin E2 and observed less TRAP-positive osteoclasts with osteoblasts expressing the CaV1.2TS than with WT osteoblasts (Figure 4, E and F), suggesting that CaV1.2TS expressed in cells of osteoblast lineage blocks osteoclastogenesis.
CaV1.2TS channel decreases osteoclast differentiation. (A) Representative images of TRAP staining in femur sections from 6-week-old control (Cre–;CaV1.2TS) and Prx1-Cre;CaV1.2TS littermate mice. (B) Analysis of osteoclast number (Oc. N) or osteoclast area (Oc. Ar) over tissue area (T. Ar) underneath the growth plate. Bar values are means ± SD (n ≥ 6. **P < 0.01). (C) Serum OPG levels of control Cre–;CaV1.2TS and Prx1-Cre;CaV1.2TS littermate mice at 6 weeks old. Bar values are means ± SD (n = 7. **P < 0.01). (D) Expression analysis of Rankl/Opg mRNA ratio by qPCR of control (Ad-GFP) versus CaV1.2TS-expressing (Ad-Cre) BMSCs after 8 days (D8) of differentiation. Bar values are means ± SD (n = 3. *P < 0.05). (E) Representative images of TRAP-stained cells in cocultures of BMMs and control (Cre–;CaV1.2TS) or CaV1.2TS-expressing (Sp7-Cre;CaV1.2TS) calvarial osteoblasts in the presence of 10 nM 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and 1 μm prostaglandin E2, n = 3. (F) Analysis of the number of TRAP-positive cells per well. Bar values are means ± SD (n ≥ 10. **P < 0.01). Statistical analysis was performed by 2-tailed unpaired t test, and a P value less than 0.05 was considered significant.
Postnatal expression of CaV1.2TS channel in Sp7-lineage cells enhances accrual of trabecular bone and prevents estrogen deficiency–induced bone loss. Having shown that CaV1.2TS expression enhances bone formation, we tested whether we could exploit CaV1.2TS expression to stimulate bone formation postnatally. We generated a doxycycline-inducible Sp7-Cre;CaV1.2TS line by crossing the floxed-STOP Rosa26-CaV1.2TS with an inducible Sp7-Cre recombinase (Sp7-tTA;TetO-EGFP-Cre) (21). We blocked Cre expression with doxycycline-impregnated food until mice were 2 months old, then we removed doxycycline to activate CaV1.2TS and analyzed the long bones 8 weeks later. μCT 3-D reconstruction of the distal femur metaphysis revealed a marked increase in trabecular bone in CaV1.2TS-expressing mice (Supplemental Figure 4A). Quantitative measurement showed that BV/TV was increased by 56% in Sp7-Cre;CaV1.2TS male mice after activating CaV1.2TS expression for 8 weeks. This increase in bone acquisition was characterized by significant increase in trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) and trabecular number (Tb.N), whereas trabecular bone separation (Tb.Sp) was unaffected (Supplemental Figure 4B).
We then tested whether expression of CaV1.2TS in postnatal bone could prevent estrogen deficiency–induced bone loss in female mice. We performed OVX on 2-month-old Sp7-Cre;CaV1.2TS mice or their Cre–;CaV1.2TS littermate controls and induced CaV1.2TS expression by removing doxycycline at the time of surgery. Simultaneous sham operation on the control (Cre–;CaV1.2TS littermates) allowed us to monitor the effects of OVX in the absence of activating CaV1.2TS. At 4 months old, the growth plates of the distal femur and the length of the humerus were normal in these mice (Supplemental Figure 5), suggesting that depleting estrogen or activating CaV1.2TS expression at the 2-month-old time point does not affect the growth plate and the longitudinal growth of long bones. In the Cre– controls subject to OVX, we observed noticeable trabecular bone loss (compared with sham controls) 8 weeks after OVX (Figure 5A). Quantitative measurements showed that 43% of BV/TV was lost in control mice after OVX (Figure 5B), consistent with less trabecular bones shown in H&E staining (Figure 5C). Compared with sham-operated control mice, the parameter Tb.Th remained relatively constant in OVX mice throughout the 8-week experimental period, while Tb.N decreased and Tb.Sp increased after OVX surgery (Figure 5B), indicating that OVX can induce loss of trabecular bone by perforation and division, as seen in previous OVX experiments (22, 23). Dynamic histomorphometric analysis showed that bone formation rate (BFR) was decreased by 71%, mineral apposition rate (MAR) was decreased by 49%, and the percentage of mineralizing surface over bone surface (MS/BS) was decreased by 38% in the control group after OVX (Figure 5, D and E), indicating reduced osteoblast function after estrogen deficiency at 2 months of age. In contrast, activation of CaV1.2TS (by removing doxycycline) at the time of surgery effectively mitigated bone loss and maintained bone mass after OVX (BV/TV, 4.25% ± 0.54%) to the same level as that in the sham-operated controls (BV/TV, 4.49% ± 0.33%) (Figure 5, A and B). The preservation of bone mass in activated CaV1.2TS mice after OVX was accompanied by maintenance of Tb.N and Tb.Sp compared with control sham mice (Figure 5B). Consistent with these data, we confirmed by H&E staining that OVX CaV1.2TS mice maintained trabecular bone in femurs similar to control sham mice and stemmed trabecular bone loss compared with OVX control mice (Figure 5C). The maintenance of bone mass after OVX in the CaV1.2TS-expressing bones was in part due to sustained osteoblast function, as dynamic histomorphometric analysis showed that BFR, MAR, and MS/BS were unaffected in CaV1.2TS mutant femurs after OVX compared with control sham mice and were significantly higher than control OVX mice (Figure 5, D and E).
CaV1.2TS prevents estrogen deficiency–induced bone loss. (A) μCT 3-D reconstruction images of metaphyses of distal femurs of mice 8 weeks after sham surgery, ovariectomy [OVX], and OVX with CaV1.2TS expression (Sp7-Cre;CaV1.2TS). (B) Analysis of bone volume density (BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), trabecular number (Tb.N), and trabecular spacing (Tb.Sp) of metaphyses of distal femurs of mice 8 weeks after sham surgery, OVX, or OVX with CaV1.2TS expression (Sp7-Cre+;CaV1.2TS). Bar values are means ± SD (n ≥ 8. **P < 0.01). (C) H&E staining of mice 8 weeks after sham surgery, OVX, or OVX with CaV1.2TS expression (Sp7-Cre;CaV1.2TS). (D) Representative images of calcein and alizarin red double labeling in the trabecular bones underneath the growth plate of mice 8 weeks after sham surgery, OVX, or OVX with CaV1.2TS expression (Sp7-Cre;CaV1.2TS). (E) Dynamic histomorphometry analysis of trabecular bones 1.5 mm away from the growth plate of mice 8 weeks after sham surgery, OVX, or OVX with CaV1.2TS expression (Sp7-Cre;CaV1.2TS). BFR, bone formation rate; MAR, mineral apposite rate; and MS/BS, percentage of mineralizing surface over bone surface. Bar values are means ± SD (n ≥ 8. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test analysis, and a P value less than 0.05 was considered significant.
This study revealed unexpected roles for the CaV1.2 voltage–gated Ca2+ channel in bone development and remodeling and uncovered consequences of increased Ca2+ influx through the channels. Using conditional mouse models and the BMSC culture system, we demonstrated that expression of a transgenic CaV1.2TS mutant channel promotes bone formation and inhibits bone resorption during skeletal development, homeostasis, and osteoporotic contexts. Actions of voltage-gated L-type Ca2+ channels were previously reported in osteosarcoma cell lines (6, 8, 24), and a previous immunohistochemical study suggested the presence of CaV1.2 in developing bones (25). Our data, exploiting a definitive CaV1.2 signal from a mouse in which lacZ was knocked into the Cacna1c gene, reveal the endogenous CaV1.2 expression pattern and avoid nonspecific signals that can arise from detection by antibodies. With this approach, we observed prominent endogenous CaV1.2 expression in the developing perichondrium/periosteum, endosteum, and growth plate, which all give rise to osteoprogenitors. We did not detect CaV1.2 in the marrow cavity, as was suggested by one study using an immunohistochemical approach (25) but not by another (26). Further, we observed the consequences of activating CaV1.2TS expression in vivo. Thus, these data extend previous findings for a CaV1.2 role in mandibular development (4) and highlight additional unexpected roles for CaV1.2 Ca2+ channels in nonexcitable tissue.
It is intriguing that, in the growth plate, we observed CaV1.2 expression in the proliferating chondrocytes but not hypertrophic chondrocytes. One resulting hypothesis is that termination of CaV1.2 expression (and the resulting downstream Ca2+ signaling) is required for the transition of proliferating chondrocytes to a hypertrophic state. Consistent with this hypothesis is our observation that bones expressing CaV1.2TS are shorter: in CaV1.2TS-expressing mice in which CaV1.2TS was driven by Prx1-Cre or Col2a1-Cre — both of which target chondrocyte lineages — a delay in chondrocyte maturation may reduce the ultimate length of the long bones.
Because these mouse models all employed Cre recombinases that drove CaV1.2TS expression in osteoblast lineages, and not in osteoclasts or their precursors, we conclude that the observed anticatabolic responses resulted from an increase in the Rankl/Opg expression ratio and OPG secretion and consequent extrinsic inhibition of osteoclastogenesis. This is consistent with previous data showing that CaV1.2 regulates OPG secretion (27) and the well-defined roles for CaV1.2 channels in promoting hormone secretion from endocrine tissue. Moreover, our lacZ expression data showed that CaV1.2 is expressed within bone tissue where osteoblast precursor cells reside, and previous RNA-seq data showed no expression of CaV1.2 in murine BMMs or during osteoclast differentiation (15).
Our data showing upregulation of 2 master osteogenic transcription factors, Runx2 and Sp7, after expression of CaV1.2TS suggest that increased Ca2+ influx through the noninactivating mutant CaV1.2 channel augments signaling cascades that promote osteoblast differentiation and mineralization. Moreover, the reduced mineralization observed in BMSC cultures treated with CaV1.2 blockers highlights the physiologic contribution of Ca2+ influx through endogenous CaV1.2 channels in osteoblast precursors. Nevertheless, we cannot exclude the possibility that Ca2+-independent signaling through CaV1.2TS contributes to the CaV1.2TS-induced increase in bone formation. Two previous studies reported that the mutant CaV1.2TS channel activates Ca2+-independent downstream signaling pathways in neurons or hair follicles, as suggested by experiments showing that expression of a “pore-dead” CaV1.2TS channel recapitulated the CaV1.2TS channel effects (28, 29). Based on observations regarding the role of CaV1.2 in mandibular development — in which a Ca2+-permeant WT or CaV1.2TS mutant channel, but not a pore-dead channel, successfully rescued abnormal development after CaV1.2 knockdown — we propose that Ca2+ influx through CaV1.2 is essential for bone development.
Our data showing that activating a transgenic, overexpressed CaV1.2TS channel during embryogenesis or postnatally increases bone mass and prevents bone loss secondary to estrogen deficiency do not likely have implications for TS patients, who have a mutant, endogenous CACNA1C locus present throughout development and beyond. Rather, the consistent results obtained by activating a CaV1.2TS channel specifically with Prx1-Cre, Col2a1-Cre, or Col1a1-Cre suggest that increasing Ca2+ influx through a noninactivating CaV1.2 channel in any osteoblast lineage cell promotes bone formation by increasing osteoblast differentiation and inhibiting osteoclast differentiation. The dual effect of transgenic CaV1.2TS suggests a possible therapeutic strategy for osteoporotic or osteopenic conditions. The majority of current osteoporosis treatments are anticatabolic agents that reduce osteoclast bone resorption, such as estrogens, bisphosphates, and calcitonin (30, 31). These anticatabolics (especially bisphosphonates) are associated with gastrointestinal problems, osteonecrosis of the jaw, and atypical femur fractures or fragility fractures. Therefore, our approach here is more in line with anabolic therapies such as recombinant human parathyroid hormone (rhPTH) (32) and more recently developed agents demonstrating dual roles (e.g., romosozumab) that show increasing promise (33). Further, the increased bone accrual postnatally observed with the inducible Sp7-Cre model highlights the potential for the development of bone-targeted CaV1.2 agonists, starting with lead compounds such as BayK-8644 or FPL 64176, for anabolic and anticatabolic skeletal effects, as observed in our CaV1.2TS mice.
Experimental mouse models. CaV1.2+/LacZ, Rosa26-CaV1.2TS, and Rosa26-CaV1.2WT mouse lines have been described previously (4, 16). Homozygous Rosa26-CaV1.2TS or Rosa26-CaV1.2WT mice were crossed with the transgenic Prx1-Cre (17), Col2a1-Cre (18), or 2.3Col1a1-Cre (19) mice. All skeletal analyses were performed on 6-week-old mice unless otherwise specified. For serum OPG assay (R&D Systems), serum was collected from 6-week-old mice without fasting following the manufacturer’s instructions.
To generate inducible mouse models for investigating postnatal bone formation and remodeling, we crossed Rosa26-CaV1.2TS mice with Sp7-Cre (B6.Cg-Tg [Sp7-tTA, tetO-EGFP/cre] 1Amc/J; The Jackson Laboratory) (21). Breeders and their pups were maintained on a rodent diet containing 625 mg/kg doxycycline (Harlan) to suppress Cre recombinase expression in the embryonic and early postnatal stages. Chow was replaced with regular rodent diet (no doxycycline) to induce Cre expression when mice were 2 months old. For OVX experiments, OVX or sham operation were performed on 2-month-old female mutant (Sp7-Cre;CaV1.2TS) and control (Cre–;CaV1.2TS) mice under isofluorane anesthesia. The doxycycline diet was replaced with regular rodent diet on the same day of OVX or sham surgery. Tissue was collected for analysis 8 weeks after OVX.
Chemicals. All chemicals were obtained from MilliporeSigma unless otherwise indicated.
X-gal staining. X-gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside) staining was performed on frozen tissue sections. Forelimbs or hindlimbs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde on ice for 20 minutes (embryos) or 1 hour (postnatal stage), decalcified with 14% EDTA at 4°C, processed to 30% sucrose, and snap-frozen embedded with OCT compound (Sakura Finetek). Frozen sections (10 μm–thick) were refixed in ice-cold 1× PBS with 2% paraformaldehyde, 0.2% glutaraldehyde, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.2% Tween-20, and 30% sucrose for 10 minutes and stained with X-gal staining solution (5 mM potassium ferrocyanide, 5 mM potassium ferricyanide, 1 mg/ml X-gal, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.1% sodium deoxycholate, and 0.2% IGEPAL CA-630 in dark for 24–48 hours at 37°C. Specimens were counterstained with Nuclear Fast Red. For X-gal staining on BMSCs, the staining was performed for 48 hours at 37°C.
X-ray radiography and μCT analysis of mice. X-ray radiographic images of the hindlimbs were acquired using a Faxitron X-ray system (Faxitron Bioptics) at 31 kV for 9 seconds. For μCT scanning, the specimens were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and then fitted in a 50 ml centrifuge tube with 70% ethanol. Images were obtained with a Scanco VivaCT 80 scanner (Scanco Medical AG) set to 55 kVp and 145 μA, voxel size 10.4 μm. To quantify trabecular bone parameters, 50 μCT slices (~0.5 mm total) immediately below the distal growth plate of the femur were analyzed.
Double labeling and cryosectioning. For dynamic histomorphometry, mice were injected i.p. with calcein and alizarin-3-methyliminodiacetic acid (MilliporeSigma) at 20 mg/kg and 40 mg/kg, respectively, on days 8 and 2 prior to euthanasia. Femurs were extracted and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24 hours. After washing with 1× PBS, nondecalcified femurs were processed to 30% sucrose and OCT embedding, and they were sectioned at 10 μm using Leica Cryostat equipped with Cryojane (Leica). The slides were counterstained with DAPI. Dynamic histomorphometry was performed with OsteoMeasure commercial software.
Histology and TRAP staining. For histology, decalcified samples were processed for paraffin embedding and then sectioned at 6-μm thickness. H&E, ABH/OG, and TRAP staining were performed following standard protocols.
Mouse BMSC isolation and culture, viral infection, and osteoblast differentiation. BMSCs were isolated aseptically from the femurs and tibias of 6- to 10-week-old Rosa26-CaV1.2TS or WT mice and were plated in α-MEM without ascorbic acid (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with 15% FBS (Hyclone) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen) at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator. After 48 hours of adhesion, the media was changed to remove nonadherent cells. BMSCs reached confluency after an additional 4 days of culture with a single media change. Cells were passaged with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA digestion (Invitrogen) and reseeded at 3 × 105 cells/6-well or 1 × 105 cells/12-well for mineralization assays.
For viral infections, cells at 70% confluency were infected with adenovirus expressing either GFP or Cre-recombinase (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 50 in serum-containing medium for 24 hours. Seventy-two hours after viral infection, BMSCs were cultured in osteogenic media (α-MEM containing 15% FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 50 μg/ml L-ascorbic acid [MilliporeSigma] and 10 mM β-glycerophosphate [MilliporeSigma]). For von Kossa staining, cells were fixed in methanol on ice for 20 minutes, rinsed with distilled water, and exposed to 365 nm ultraviolet light in 5% silver nitrate solution (MilliporeSigma) for 2 minutes.
Coculture osteoclastogenesis assay. Primary calvarial osteoblasts were isolated from P0 to P2 Cre–;CaV1.2TS (control) or Sp7-Cre;CaV1.2TS pups. The calvaria were digested in 1× PBS containing 0.18% collagenase P (Roche Diagnostics) for 10 minutes at 37°C with vigorous shaking. The digestion was repeated 4 times, and the cells isolated from the last 3 digestions were combined. The isolated osteoblasts (5 × 103 cells/well) were seeded in a 96-well plate with 200 μl of α-MEM containing 15% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin in 5% CO2 at 37°C 2 days before starting the coculture. Twenty-four hours after adhesion, the medium was changed to osteogenic media. BMMs were isolated from BM of WT C57BL/6J mice and cultured on a 100-mm culture dish after lysis of the RBC with α-MEM containing 15% FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 5 ng/ml of M-CSF for 24 hours. Nonadherent cells were collected, washed once with 1× PBS, resuspended in osteogenic media with addition of 10 nM of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and 1 μm of prostaglandin E2, and added to the wells of the 96-well plate containing the calvarial osteoblasts. The coculture was observed for 6–9 days, and half of the media was changed every other day until the appearance of giant osteoclasts. To visualize osteoclasts, cells were fixed and processed for TRAP staining.
Real-time PCR. Total RNA was isolated from BMSCs using RNAeasy mini kit (Qiagen). Total RNA (1 μg) was reverse transcribed to cDNA using iScript Reverse Transcription Supermix (Bio-Rad). qPCR was performed using SYBR green Supermix (Bio-Rad). Gene expression was first normalized to GAPDH and then normalized to control samples. The primers for Runx2, Sp7, Alpl, Bglap, and Ibsp were previously described (34). The primers for Gapdh are: forward, 5′ - AGTAACACCACGGAGGGGG - 3′; reverse, 5′ - GGTCTGATCACAGGGCATGG - 3′. The primers for Opg (Tnfrsf11b) are: forward, 5′ - CCGAGGACCACAATGAACAAGT - 3′; reverse, 5′ - CTGGGTTGTCCATTCAATGATG - 3′. The primers for Rankl (Tnfs11) are: forward, 5′ - CTGGGCCAAGATCTCTAACATGA - 3′; reverse, 5′ - GGTACGCTTCCCGATGTTTC - 3′.
Statistics. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 7.0. Two-tailed unpaired t tests were used for 2 conditions, and 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test analysis was applied for multipe comparisons. P < 0.05 was considered statically significant. Data are represented as mean ± SD from n ≥ 3 experiments. qPCR assays were performed with 3 independent RNA isolates. Viral transfections were repeated n ≥ 3. Fold changes were calculated by dividing the value of the treatment group by the value of the control group at the same time point. Increasing or decreasing percentage changes were calculated by dividing the value of difference between the treatment group and control group by the value of the control group and then multiplying 100.
Study approval. All mouse protocols were approved by the IACUC at Duke University.
CC designed research, conducted experiments, acquired data, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript; YR conducted experiments; ASB designed research, conducted experiments, acquired data, and analyzed data; AJM conducted experiments; DR conducted experiments; SHM acquired data and analyzed data; KHPM, ALM, and FG analyzed data; CMK, MJH, and GSP designed research, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript.
This work was supported by NIH NIAMS R01 AR063071 to MJH; a Duke Chancellor’s Discovery Award, a Harrington Discovery Institute/Harrington Scholar-Innovator grant, and NIH NICHD R01 HD090132 to GSP. We thank Matthew Greenblatt (Weill Cornell) for helpful suggestions.
Address correspondence to: Matthew J. Hilton, 308 Research Drive, LSRC Building Room B321C, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA. Phone: 919.613.9761; Email: matthew.hilton@dm.duke.edu. Or to: Geoffrey S. Pitt, 413 East 69th Street, Belfer Research Building Room 502, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York 10021, USA. Phone: 646.962.7641; Email: geoffrey.pitt@med.cornell.edu.
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Reference information: JCI Insight. 2017;2(22):e95512. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.95512.
Electronic publication