Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Genomic landscape and evolution of metastatic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma
Jozefina Casuscelli, Nils Weinhold, Gunes Gundem, Lu Wang, Emily C. Zabor, Esther Drill, Patricia I. Wang, Gouri J. Nanjangud, Almedina Redzematovic, Amrita M. Nargund, Brandon J. Manley, Maria E. Arcila, Nicholas M. Donin, John C. Cheville, R. Houston Thompson, Allan J. Pantuck, Paul Russo, Emily H. Cheng, William Lee, Satish K. Tickoo, Irina Ostrovnaya, Chad J. Creighton, Elli Papaemmanuil, Venkatraman E. Seshan, A. Ari Hakimi, James J. Hsieh
Jozefina Casuscelli, Nils Weinhold, Gunes Gundem, Lu Wang, Emily C. Zabor, Esther Drill, Patricia I. Wang, Gouri J. Nanjangud, Almedina Redzematovic, Amrita M. Nargund, Brandon J. Manley, Maria E. Arcila, Nicholas M. Donin, John C. Cheville, R. Houston Thompson, Allan J. Pantuck, Paul Russo, Emily H. Cheng, William Lee, Satish K. Tickoo, Irina Ostrovnaya, Chad J. Creighton, Elli Papaemmanuil, Venkatraman E. Seshan, A. Ari Hakimi, James J. Hsieh
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Genetics Oncology

Genomic landscape and evolution of metastatic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) typically shows ~7 chromosome losses (1, 2, 6, 10, 13, 17, and 21) and ~31 exonic somatic mutations, yet carries ~5%–10% metastatic incidence. Since extensive chromosomal losses can generate proteotoxic stress and compromise cellular proliferation, it is intriguing how chRCC, a tumor with extensive chromosome losses and a low number of somatic mutations, can develop lethal metastases. Genomic features distinguishing metastatic from nonmetastatic chRCC are unknown. An integrated approach, including whole-genome sequencing (WGS), targeted ultradeep cancer gene sequencing, and chromosome analyses (FACETS, OncoScan, and FISH), was performed on 79 chRCC patients including 38 metastatic (M-chRCC) cases. We demonstrate that TP53 mutations (58%), PTEN mutations (24%), and imbalanced chromosome duplication (ICD, duplication of ≥ 3 chromosomes) (25%) were enriched in M-chRCC. Reconstruction of the subclonal composition of paired primary-metastatic chRCC tumors supports the role of TP53, PTEN, and ICD in metastatic evolution. Finally, the presence of these 3 genomic features in primary tumors of both The Cancer Genome Atlas kidney chromophobe (KICH) (n = 64) and M-chRCC (n = 35) cohorts was associated with worse survival. In summary, our study provides genomic insights into the metastatic progression of chRCC and identifies TP53 mutations, PTEN mutations, and ICD as high-risk features.

Authors

Jozefina Casuscelli, Nils Weinhold, Gunes Gundem, Lu Wang, Emily C. Zabor, Esther Drill, Patricia I. Wang, Gouri J. Nanjangud, Almedina Redzematovic, Amrita M. Nargund, Brandon J. Manley, Maria E. Arcila, Nicholas M. Donin, John C. Cheville, R. Houston Thompson, Allan J. Pantuck, Paul Russo, Emily H. Cheng, William Lee, Satish K. Tickoo, Irina Ostrovnaya, Chad J. Creighton, Elli Papaemmanuil, Venkatraman E. Seshan, A. Ari Hakimi, James J. Hsieh

×

Figure 3

Characterization and validation of imbalanced chromosome duplication (ICD) through multiplatform ploidy analysis of 2 metastatic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma primary tumors.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Characterization and validation of imbalanced chromosome duplication (IC...
(A–C) For patient JH-kich-059, OncoScan output of copy number and B allele frequency plots (A) and FACETS output (B) of total copy number (log-ratio), B allele frequency (BAF) (log-odds-ratio), integer copy number (em), and chromosome cancer fraction plots show typical pattern of losses in chromosomes 1p, 2, 6, 13, 17, and 22 reflected by the total ploidy of 1.63. (C) Three-color FISH image confirms loss of 1 copy of chromosome 2 (2p23/ALK probe) and the retention of 2 copies of chromosomes 1q and 4 using 1q23/NTRK1 and chromosome 4 pericentromere (green) probes. (D–F) For patient JH-kich-058, total copy number plots from OncoScan (D) and FACETS outputs (E) show a diploid pattern, whereas the corresponding BAF plots display widespread loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH), with the most conspicuous allelic imbalance in the chRCC-7set chromosomes (1, 2, 6, 10, 13, 17, and 21). Increased integer copy numbers (em) for total alleles in most chromosomes suggest initial loss followed by gain of at least 1 copy of chromosome (E). ICD is confirmed by ploidy estimation of 2.83. FACETS integer copy number estimates are confirmed by FISH analysis (F), e.g., by the presence of 2 copies of chromosome 4 (4p16/FGFR3 probe) and 3 copies of chromosome 14 (14q32/IGH probe).

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts