Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Conflict of interest
  • Funding support
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article
Advertisement

Research ArticleCardiologyDevelopmentGenetics Open Access | 10.1172/jci.insight.206763

Reduced dosage of Kmt2d modifies Tbx1 haploinsufficiency toward phenotypes of 22q11.2DS

Daniella Miller,1 Kevyn Jackson,1 Timothy C. Cox,2 and Bernice E. Morrow1

1Department of Genetics, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women’s Health, and Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.

2Department of Oral and Craniofacial Sciences and Department of Pediatrics, University of Missouri–Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.

Address correspondence to: Bernice E. Morrow, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1301 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, New York 10461, USA. Email: Bernice.morrow@einsteinmed.edu.

Find articles by Miller, D. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Genetics, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women’s Health, and Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.

2Department of Oral and Craniofacial Sciences and Department of Pediatrics, University of Missouri–Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.

Address correspondence to: Bernice E. Morrow, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1301 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, New York 10461, USA. Email: Bernice.morrow@einsteinmed.edu.

Find articles by Jackson, K. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Genetics, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women’s Health, and Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.

2Department of Oral and Craniofacial Sciences and Department of Pediatrics, University of Missouri–Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.

Address correspondence to: Bernice E. Morrow, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1301 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, New York 10461, USA. Email: Bernice.morrow@einsteinmed.edu.

Find articles by Cox, T. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Genetics, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women’s Health, and Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.

2Department of Oral and Craniofacial Sciences and Department of Pediatrics, University of Missouri–Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.

Address correspondence to: Bernice E. Morrow, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1301 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, New York 10461, USA. Email: Bernice.morrow@einsteinmed.edu.

Find articles by Morrow, B. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published August 24, 2026 - More info

Published in Volume 11, Issue 16 on August 24, 2026
JCI Insight. 2026;11(16):e206763. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.206763.
© 2026 Miller et al. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Published August 24, 2026 - Version history
Received: March 12, 2026; Accepted: July 7, 2026
View PDF
Abstract

Haploinsufficiency of TBX1, which occurs in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS), leads to a heterogeneous spectrum of clinical manifestations, including craniofacial anomalies, immunodeficiency, and congenital heart defects. The variability in syndromic presentation between patients may be partially explained by variants in chromatin regulatory genes that act to further modify TBX1 function. To investigate this relationship, we selected KMT2D as a candidate gene because of its role in the etiology of Kabuki syndrome, which shares overlapping features with 22q11.2DS. We demonstrate that conditional inactivation of Kmt2d in the Tbx1 lineage in Tbx1-heterozygous mice leads to fully penetrant perinatal lethality and increased incidence of craniofacial dysmorphism, thymus and parathyroid gland hypoplasia, and aortic arch anomalies. At early stages, mutant embryos were found to have defects of the caudal pharyngeal apparatus, including abnormal patterning of the third pouch endoderm, hypoplastic fourth arches, and defective fourth arch arteries. Finally, analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing revealed dysregulation, and largely downregulation, of genes involved in basic cellular functions, suggesting that Tbx1 and Kmt2d developmentally converge upon essential biological processes. Overall, these results indicate that reduced dosage of Kmt2d perturbs the developmental landscape of the Tbx1 heterozygote, eliciting phenotypes that are shared between 22q11.2DS and Kabuki syndrome.

Graphical Abstract
graphical abstract
Introduction

In 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS), which occurs in 1 in 4,000 live births, around 90% of patients present with an approximately 3 million-base-pair hemizygous deletion on chromosome 22q11.2 (1). Despite this similarity in deletion size, there is high variability in the clinical presentation, which can include characteristic craniofacial features, palatal abnormalities, immunodeficiency, hypoparathyroidism, and cardiac anomalies, among others (1). Although 22q11.2DS occurs with a hemizygous deletion of more than 45 protein-coding genes (2), a main gene responsible for cardiac and other clinical manifestations is TBX1, which encodes a T-box transcription factor whose function is sensitive to gene dosage. The classic cardiac presentation involves the outflow tract (OFT), leading to conotruncal defects (CTDs) that include tetralogy of Fallot, retroesophageal right subclavian artery (RERSA), interrupted aortic arch type B (IAAB), and persistent truncus arteriosus (PTA) (3); many of these defects cause early mortality in 22q11.2DS, although they only occur in about 60%–80% of patients. The basis of variable phenotypic expression is a long-studied question with several explanatory theories that likely exist in concert, including the occurrence of stochastic developmental events during embryogenesis, differences in environmental exposure in utero, and genetic modifiers on the remaining allele of 22q11.2 or elsewhere in the genome (2). In this study, we attempt to expound on the role of genetic modifiers in TBX1 phenotypes, as they are readily identifiable with current technologies and may eventually represent targets for future therapeutic intervention (4).

To identify possible modifiers, short-read whole-genome sequencing was previously performed on a cohort of 1,182 subjects with 22q11.2DS who were stratified by presence of CTDs versus those with normal cardiac anatomy (5). This revealed rare, potentially deleterious coding or splicing DNA variants in chromatin regulatory genes that occurred in 8.5% of the 22q11.2DS cases with CTDs (5). In independent studies of sporadic congenital heart disease, de novo mutations were found in some of the same chromatin regulatory genes, including KMT2C, KAT6A, NSD1, and KMT2D (6). Mouse genetic studies have shed some light on how Tbx1 might interact with chromatin regulatory genes in various developmental pathways (7–9); our work here aims to expand the known regulatory network of the 22q11.2DS gene Tbx1 in mouse models, with a particular focus on Kmt2d. KMT2D, the main causative gene in Kabuki syndrome, functions as an H3K4 methyltransferase that modifies histones at enhancer regions in order to activate gene expression (10). Kabuki syndrome has many overlapping features with 22q11.2DS, including cardiac defects (a subset of which are CTDs), palatal defects, craniofacial anomalies, and developmental delay (11, 12). Thus, while each of the chromatin genes identified in our previous study is of interest for further exploration, Kmt2d was particularly compelling to investigate with respect to the function of Tbx1.

Tbx1 has a dosage sensitivity directly related to severity of phenotype (13–15), with anomalies in mouse models mirroring those on the 22q11.2DS spectrum (16). Tbx1-heterozygous mice have hypoplastic or absent fourth pharyngeal arch arteries (PAAs) at variable penetrance depending on genetic background, but largely undergo recovery and are otherwise viable (17, 18). Tbx1-null mutant mice, in which both copies of the gene are inactivated, die at birth with an overt cleft palate, absent parathyroid and thymus glands, and a PTA that results from failure of OFT septation (18). The structures impacted in Tbx1-mutant mouse embryos are largely derived from the pharyngeal apparatus, a transient developmental structure that is composed of ectoderm, endoderm, mesoderm, and neural crest cells (NCCs) (19–21). Tbx1 is expressed in all three germ layers of the pharyngeal apparatus and has a non-autonomous role in NCC function; thus, Tbx1-null embryos fail to form pharyngeal arches 2–6, explaining the spectrum of phenotypes described above (22, 23). Our interest is to clarify whether and how Kmt2d cooperates with Tbx1 in pharyngeal apparatus development, potentially highlighting a mechanistic overlap between the two genes that underlies aspects of their shared phenotypes. To do this, we inactivated a floxed allele of Kmt2d using the knockin Tbx1Cre/+ allele that also functions as a Tbx1 heterozygote (24). By inactivating either one or both copies of Kmt2d in this lineage, we are modeling the rare patients from our cohort who have variants in KMT2D along with TBX1 haploinsufficiency (5). It is important to note that the KMT2D variants found in the 22q11.2DS patient cohort were missense variants of uncertain significance; we theorize that, while they may not be pathogenic in isolation, they have a synergistic effect when combined with the 22q11.2 deletion. Our results reveal dose-sensitive developmental roles of Kmt2d in the morphogenesis of Tbx1-dependent tissues, as evidenced by mild defects when one copy is conditionally deleted, and more severe defects when both are conditionally inactivated. Finally, single-cell transcriptomic analysis reveals downregulation of genes involved in transcription, cell cycle, and various signaling pathways, suggesting that Kmt2d impacts the developmental landscape of the Tbx1 heterozygote through shared essential pathways.

Results

Conditional inactivation of Kmt2d in the Tbx1 lineage results in perinatal lethality with mild craniofacial dysmorphism and feeding defects. We began by validating that the Kmt2d-floxed allele functions as previously described by inactivating it in the Mesp1Cre lineage and recapitulating previous findings of early lethality by embryonic day 10.5 (E10.5) (25) (Supplemental Figure 1, A–C; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.206763DS1). We then set out to determine whether Kmt2d and Tbx1 genetically interact by conditionally inactivating Kmt2d in the Tbx1 lineage and assessing for embryonic or perinatal lethality. Tbx1Cre/+ mice have a knockin of the Cre gene to the coding region of exon 5, therefore functioning as Tbx1 heterozygotes (26). Tbx1Cre mice were crossed with homozygous Kmt2d-floxed mice (Kmt2dfl/fl) (25) to test whether there are shared and/or separate functions between Tbx1 and Kmt2d, in the Tbx1 lineage. Analysis of the Mendelian ratio of live pups at weaning age (postnatal day 21 [P21]) showed no significant difference in the number of Tbx1Cre/+ Kmt2dfl/+ (conditional heterozygote [cHet]) mice as compared with control Kmt2dfl/+ mice in a mixed genetic background (Supplemental Figure 1D). The cHets were then crossed with Kmt2dfl/fl mice to determine whether there is a more severe phenotype in the Tbx1Cre/+ Kmt2dfl/fl (conditional knockout [cKO]) mice. Conditional knockout of both copies of Kmt2d was confirmed using RT-qPCR, which showed significant depletion (P < 0.0001) of Kmt2d in the cKO compared with Tbx1Cre/+ control embryos at E9.5 (Supplemental Figure 1E). Dissection of littermates at various stages during embryonic development showed expected Mendelian ratios for each genotype (Supplemental Figure 1F). Assessment at E16.5 did not reveal appreciable gross defects in either the cHet or the cKO embryos as compared with Kmt2dfl/fl controls (Figure 1A). We found that all cKO embryos survived embryogenesis (E17.5; Figure 1B, dashed line) but none survived past the first day after birth (P0; Figure 1B). We then systematically analyzed the phenotypes in resulting embryos, beginning with the craniofacial region, to determine the reason for lethality. Whole-body micro-CT scans were performed at E17.5 (Figure 1C), and craniofacial parameters were quantified. Differences in the head width/mandibular width ratio (Figure 1D), as well as the mandibular width/mandibular length ratio (Figure 1E), were slight but significant only between controls and cKO embryos. There was no statistical difference in these ratios between controls and cHet embryos, nor between cHet and cKO embryos, suggesting an intermediate phenotype that is subthreshold in the cHet embryos. The midface length/mandibular length ratio (Figure 1F) was significantly greater in cKO embryos compared with both controls and cHet embryos. Taken together, we found that the cKO embryos had slightly narrower heads with shorter but wider (posteriorly) mandibles as compared with controls. We observed normal skeletal structures (Figure 1C) except for the presence of an extra rib element at the C7 vertebra in most of the cKO embryos as compared with controls, suggesting partial disruption of the known homeotic role of KMT2D (27). Finally, microdissections and micro-CTs of control and cKO embryos at P0 showed normal organs on a gross level (Supplemental Figure 2, A and B), including a normal-appearing hyoid bone (Supplemental Figure 2C), which is known to be disrupted in Tbx1 mutants (28).

Inactivation of Kmt2d in the Tbx1 lineage leads to fully penetrant perinataFigure 1

Inactivation of Kmt2d in the Tbx1 lineage leads to fully penetrant perinatal lethality. (A) Embryos at E16.5 show no gross morphological defects (n = >10 per genotype). (B) There was no difference in Mendelian ratios between control (Kmt2dfl/+, Kmt2dfl/fl; without Cre), cHet, and cKO embryos in utero (E17.5, n = 191) or at time of birth (P0, n = 339). Dashed line separates fetal from neonatal life. P0, P1, and P7 genotypes represent sequential data from the same litters. All cKO pups died by P1, and no significant difference in survival was found in the remaining genotypes at P7. (C) Micro-CT scans of embryos at E17.5 showing full-body scans, skeletal structure, and cranial bones of the different genotypes of interest (n = 6). (D) Graph of head width/mandibular width showing a significant decrease in cKO compared with control embryos (n = 6 per genotype). (E) Graph of mandibular width/mandibular length showing a significant increase in cKO embryos compared with controls (n = 6 per genotype). (F) Graph of midface length/mandibular length showing a significant increase in cKO embryos compared with both controls and cHets (n = 6 per genotype). (G) Lethality curve showing time of death in control (n = 23) versus cKO (n = 21) pups over the course of P0 in 6-hour intervals. (H) Control stomach at P0.75 showing presence of milk as compared with cKO embryos, which had absence of milk (n = 8 for both genotypes). (I) Palates of control (n = 8) and cKO (n = 7) embryos at E18.5 and P0 show reduced closure of the posterior palate in cKO embryos and neonates. Scale bars: (A) 2 mm, (H) 5 mm, (I) 1 mm. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. Statistical analysis was performed using 3-way ANOVA.

Since these are not likely lethal defects on their own, we further assessed cause of lethality by examining litters at 6-hour intervals between P0 and P1. We found that 40% of newborns died within the first 6 hours after birth, and the rest died between 12 and 24 hours after birth (Figure 1G). To make sense of these 2 critical time points of lethality, we performed necropsy studies at the end of P0, which revealed an absence of milk in the stomach of the cKO newborns as compared with stage-matched controls (Figure 1H). This finding indicates a lethal suckling defect, consistent with the reported timing for neonatal murine death due to malnourishment (29). We did not identify an overt cleft palate (which occurs in Tbx1-null embryos), but we observed a submucosal/incomplete cleft, as evidenced by increased distance between the posterior rugae at the midline, which was seen in all mutants with varying severity (Figure 1I). Notably, palatal abnormalities are common in 22q11.2DS and include overt cleft as well as velopharyngeal insufficiency due to non-bony defects (30). Although of unique occurrence, we also noted one mutant with absence of multiple bones of the posterior palate (Supplemental Figure 2D). The observed mild craniofacial and palatal abnormalities together suggest impaired feeding and/or other causes of suckling impairment (29); however, they do not account for the smaller percentage of lethality that occurs in the first quarter of P0.

Kmt2d conditional null mutant embryos have cardiac and aortic arch defects. Since congenital heart defects are a common cause of early neonatal lethality, and such defects are present in both 22q11.2DS and Kabuki syndrome, we performed gross and histological analysis of control (Kmt2dfl/fl) and cKO late-stage (>E15.5) embryos and P0 pups. Histology of hearts at E17.5 showed normal morphology in controls (Figure 2A), but myocardial hypoplasia in the interventricular septum (IVS) at the apex of the heart, as well as thinning of the adjacent right ventricular (RV) myocardium, in 30% of cKO mutants (Figure 2B). Assessment at E15.5 showed a similar percentage (30%) with disorganization in the same region of the IVS that resembled an incomplete muscular ventricular septal defect (VSD) (Supplemental Figure 3, A and B). Interestingly, although VSDs are common in both 22q11.2DS and Kabuki syndrome, we did not observe VSDs in the cKO mutant embryos. Assessment of P0 cKO littermate hearts supported this distinction in cardiac phenotype, showing an abnormally structured IVS in the P0.25 pup as compared with its P0.75 counterpart (Figure 2C), suggesting that the former may die earlier in P0 as a result of cardiac dysfunction. We therefore examined the Tbx1 lineage in the late-stage heart by assessing the localization of GFP, which can be appreciated in the IVS and RV myocardium of the E17.5 heart grossly (Figure 2D). Anti-GFP immunofluorescence-stained cryosections at E17.5 (Figure 2D) and earlier at E15.5 (Supplemental Figure 3C) show that the Tbx1 lineage extends into the right ventricle and part of the IVS (26, 31, 32). We found similar IVS/RV defects in a subset of Tbx1-null mutants (Tbx1Cre/fl; ~22%, n = 9) versus controls (Tbx1Cre/+) at E17.5 (Supplemental Figure 3, D–F), suggesting that loss of either Tbx1 or Kmt2d could affect the development of the IVS at the apex of the heart.

Kmt2d-cKO embryos have cardiac and aortic arch defects.Figure 2

Kmt2d-cKO embryos have cardiac and aortic arch defects. (A) Control heart at E17.5 showing proper formation of the interventricular septum (IVS) and right ventricular (RV) myocardium (n = 3). (B) cKO littermate heart showing structural abnormalities in the IVS and RV myocardium (n = 10, 3 of which displayed this defect). (C) cKO hearts at P0.75 versus P0.25 showing difference in structure of the IVS (n = 2 per stage). (D) Left: Whole heart of E17.5 Tbx1Cre/+ embryo with GFP reporter marking the lineage (n = 5). Right: GFP immunofluorescence on a section of an E17.5 Tbx1Cre/+ heart (n = 3). (E) Gross view of an E17.5 heart and H&E-stained transverse section at E15.5 showing normal aortic branching in the cHet. (F) Gross view of an E17.5 heart and H&E-stained transverse section at E15.5 showing RERSA in the cKO embryos. (G) Gross view of a P0 heart and H&E-stained transverse section at E15.5 showing IAAB in the cKO. (H) Schematic of the different phenotypes observed in the Kmt2d-cKO embryos that are suggested to cause lethality at different time points during P0. Scale bars: 250 μm. *Esophagus; Ao, aorta; IAAB, interrupted aortic arch type B; IVS, interventricular septum; LA, left atrium; LCA, left common carotid artery; LV, left ventricle; OFT, outflow tract; PT, pulmonary trunk; RA, right atrium; RCA, right common carotid artery; RSA, right subclavian artery; RV, right ventricle; Th, thyroid; Tr, trachea.

Although Tbx1-null mice have fully penetrant PTA, we did not observe this phenotype or note other OFT abnormalities in cKO mutant embryos/neonates. We theorized that this could be due to functional redundancy between Kmt2d and another Kmt2 family member such as Kmt2c, its paralog. To test this, we inactivated both genes using Tbx1Cre and found that the Kmt2c/Kmt2d double-cKO mice had similar perinatal lethality and phenotype to the Kmt2d-cKO embryos, displaying proper septation of the aorta and pulmonary trunk as compared with control littermates (Supplemental Figure 4, A and B). We performed this cross with 2 different constructs of a Kmt2c-floxed mouse, one with deletion in the SET domain (33) (data not shown) and one with deletion at exon 3 (34), with neither displaying a detectable increase in phenotypic severity. Further, we observed that mice with conditional inactivation of either construct of Kmt2c in the Tbx1 lineage survived past weaning age, indicating disparate roles for Kmt2c and Kmt2d in this lineage despite their paralogous relationship (Supplemental Figure 4, C and D).

Since aortic arch branching anomalies are frequent in 22q11.2DS and Tbx1-mutant embryos, we assessed the aorta and its arterial branches. This was done by opening of the chest for gross assessment at E17.5 and by histological sectioning with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of embryos at E15.5 for confirmation of proper arterial branch points (Figure 2E). This revealed the presence of RERSA (Figure 2F) in 37% of cKO mutant embryos and IAAB (Figure 2G) in 11%. While RERSA is a non-lethal phenotype (35), IAAB is lethal in both humans and mice (36) and accounts for a subset of the early P0 lethality in cKO pups. Incidentally, we also noted that 31% of cHet embryos presented with RERSA as well, which was not found in the Tbx1Cre/+ mice in the mixed genetic background, suggesting that inactivation of one copy of Kmt2d in the presence of Tbx1 heterozygosity elicits low penetrance of this aortic branching phenotype. A summary of the proposed causes of lethality in the cKO is presented in Figure 2H.

Kmt2d cKO embryos display increased penetrance of fourth PAA defects. Because of the presence of both IAAB and RERSA in a subset of cKO pups, we looked earlier in developmental time at the fourth PAAs at E10.5. The left fourth PAA forms the portion of the aorta proximal to the left carotid artery, while the right fourth PAA forms the right subclavian artery (RSA); thus, defects in the former lead to IAAB and defects in the latter lead to RERSA (37). To do this, whole-mount immunofluorescence was performed on embryos at E10.5 using antibodies to PECAM1 to mark endothelial cells and visualize the third, fourth, and sixth PAAs (Figure 3A). India ink injection into the heart can identify whether the PAAs are patent, as is demonstrated in controls (Kmt2dfl/fl) and cHets at E10.5 that have proper filling of the third, fourth, and sixth PAAs (Figure 3, B and C). There was no filling of India ink in the fourth PAAs of cKO embryos (Figure 3D), indicating the absence of a fourth PAA lumen. Whole-mount PECAM1 immunofluorescence similarly shows proper formation of the PAAs in controls bilaterally (Figure 3E). Around half of the cHet embryos had proper fourth PAA formation bilaterally (Figure 3F), while the other half had hypoplasia or absence of the right fourth PAA. We observed a similar proportion of fourth PAA defects in the cHet and Tbx1Cre/+ embryos, even though only the former displayed RERSA at late stage. Finally, 100% of cKO embryos had bilateral hypoplasia and/or absence of the fourth PAAs, which often presented as an endothelial plexus with no artery/lumen (Figure 3G). Despite the complete penetrance of bilateral fourth PAA defects in cKO embryos at E10.5, the corresponding late-stage defects, as noted above, only occurred in a fraction of cKO mutants. This discrepancy could be seen for both right- (Figure 3H) and left-sided (Figure 3I) defects, consistent with the partial recovery in fourth PAA defects that is widely reported in Tbx1+/– heterozygous mice (35). Information on the proportions of fourth PAA and aortic branching defects can be found in Table 1. Finally, using the Mef2c-AHF-Cre mice, we inactivated Kmt2d in the anterior second heart field (aSHF) lineage, from which the endothelium of the third, fourth, and sixth PAAs is derived (38). We found that there were no fourth PAA defects in this condition, indicating that the fourth PAA phenotype of the Kmt2d cKO in the Tbx1 lineage is mediated by alteration of Tbx1 function rather than direct contribution of Kmt2d to the fourth PAA endothelium (Supplemental Figure 5A). Further, we noted that the Tbx1 lineage contribution to the fourth PAA was more limited compared with that of the aSHF lineage, suggesting that Tbx1 may impact the fourth PAA endothelial cells in a non-autonomous manner as has been previously described (39) (Supplemental Figure 5, B–D).

Kmt2d-cKO embryos have more severe fourth PAA defects than other genotypes.Figure 3

Kmt2d-cKO embryos have more severe fourth PAA defects than other genotypes. (A) E10.5 mouse embryo with graphical overlay of the dorsal aorta and PAAs 3–6 and a representative PECAM1 immunofluorescence staining of the third, fourth, and sixth PAAs of a control (Kmt2dfl/fl) embryo. (B–D) India ink injection of E10.5 right-sided PAAs in control, cHet, and cKO embryos shows that ink could not fill the fourth PAA in the cKO embryos, indicating absence of an artery lumen. (E–G) PECAM1 (red) and DAPI (blue) stain of right and left fourth PAAs in control, cHet, and cKO embryos at E10.5 showing that cKO embryos have an endothelial plexus (asterisks and insets) instead of a mature artery. (H) Summary of the right-sided defects in the cHet compared with the cKO embryos. RERSA occurred at reduced penetrance in both cHet and cKO embryos. (I) Summary of the left-sided defects in cHet compared with the cKO embryos. IAAB only occurred in the cKO mutant embryos and at reduced penetrance. Scale bars: (A) 100 μm, (B–D) 300 μm, (E–G) 100 μm. (G) Insets magnification, ×5.7. IAAB, interrupted aortic arch type B; PAA, pharyngeal arch artery; RERSA, retroesophageal right subclavian artery.

Table 1

Proportion of aortic arch and fourth PAA defects in each genotype

Kmt2d-cKO embryos exhibit thymus and parathyroid defects due to improper third pharyngeal pouch morphogenesis. Another obvious defect in cKO mutant embryos upon opening of the chest cavity was the presence of thymus gland defects, which is a common occurrence in 22q11.2DS and Tbx1-mutant mouse models (17, 18, 40). GFP expression in Tbx1Cre/+ at E17.5 showed the presence of the Tbx1 lineage in the thymic lobes, presumably the thymic epithelial cells derived from the pharyngeal endoderm lineage (41) (Figure 4A). Controls (Kmt2dfl/fl) showed normal thymus lobes bilaterally, while cKO embryos displayed a variety of defects ranging from hypoplasia to ectopia to complete absence of the thymus (Figure 4B). It is interesting to note that right-sided thymus defects were more severe than left-sided defects (Figure 4C) and that the most severe left-sided defects occurred in conjunction with IAAB (as seen in Figure 4B). We then assessed for parathyroid gland defects as well, since both the thymus and parathyroid glands arise from the third pharyngeal pouch (42). Controls had proper localization of the parathyroid glands (Figure 4D), but assessment of the cKO embryos revealed bilateral parathyroid gland defects (Figure 4E), which was also observed in cHets (Table 2). Our laboratory previously reported that 38% of Tbx1 heterozygotes of mixed background had parathyroid defects (24), thus indicating that there is an increased frequency of parathyroid gland defects in the cHet and cKO embryos described here. The parathyroid glands are small at this stage, and we therefore did not subclassify defects, as they likely include a combination of hypoplasia (Figure 4E, arrowhead), ectopia, and/or absence. These defects are summarized in Table 2. To understand the origin of the thymus and parathyroid abnormalities seen in the cKO mutant embryos, we performed RNAscope in situ hybridization on embryo tissue sections of control and cKO embryos at E10.5 and E11.5. We investigated the third pharyngeal pouches using markers for the primitive parathyroid (Gcm2) and thymus (Foxn1) glands. Proper patterning involves anterior-dorsal expression of Gcm2 and ventral expression of Foxn1 at E10.5, followed by an increase of Foxn1 expression into the posterior-ventral region of the third endodermal pouch until its expression pattern fully complements that of Gcm2 by E11.5 (Figure 4F). The expression of Tbx1 overlapped with Gcm2 at both E10.5 and E11.5 (Figure 4F). In the cKO embryos, expression of both Gcm2 and Foxn1 was reduced (Figure 4G), while the pattern of Tbx1 matched Gcm2 but also showed some possible ectopic expression (Figure 4G, white arrow). Aside from abnormal expression patterning, the structure of the pharyngeal pouch itself was malformed, particularly at E10.5, as is graphically represented in Figure 4H. One cKO embryo showed a particularly small third pharyngeal pouch at E11.5 (Supplemental Figure 6, A and B), which we posit would have led to a late-stage phenotype on the more severe end of the spectrum of defects; this phenotype has also been reported in the Ezh2 cKO in the Tbx1 lineage (9). Thus, there was variability in the reduced expression and structural dysmorphism of the third pharyngeal pouch, consistent with the variability seen in the defects of the later-stage counterparts of the thymus and parathyroid glands.

Kmt2d-cKO embryos exhibit thymus and parathyroid gland defects and third phFigure 4

Kmt2d-cKO embryos exhibit thymus and parathyroid gland defects and third pharyngeal pouch differentiation defects. (A) Whole-mount view of the thymus anterior to the heart in a Tbx1Cre/+ embryo at E17.5 using GFP to mark the Tbx1 lineage (n = 5). (B) Whole-mount views of the thymus and heart in the different genotypes of interest. Control (Kmt2dfl/fl) embryos at E17.5 have intact thymus lobes bilaterally, while the cKO embryos present with variable defects. The majority of cKO embryos presented with left and right lobe hypoplasia and ectopia (cKO), but several presented with right lobe hypoplasia and absence (indicated by asterisk) of the left lobe (cKO, IAAB). (C) Graph depicting the difference in severity of left- versus right-sided thymus defects in cKO embryos. (D) Transverse H&E section of a control embryo at E16.5 showing proper formation of the parathyroid glands. (E) Transverse H&E section of a cKO embryo at E16.5 showing absence of the left parathyroid gland and a hypoplastic right parathyroid gland (arrowhead). (F) RNAscope analysis of paraffin tissue sections in the region of the third pharyngeal pouch using probes for Tbx1, Foxn1, and Gcm2 in controls shows normal gene expression patterns from E10.5 to E11.5 (E10.5, n = 5; E11/11.5, n = 3). (G) RNAscope analysis of the third pharyngeal pouch in cKO embryos shows differences in pouch formation and reduced expression of Foxn1 and Gcm2 that can be appreciated from E10.5 to E11.5 (E10.5, n = 5; E11/11.5, n = 3). (H) Illustration of the expression patterns seen in the third pharyngeal pouch of control versus cKO embryos at E10.5 and E11.5. Scale bars: (A and B) 250 μm, (D–G) 50 μm. A, anterior; D, dorsal; LPt, left parathyroid gland; LT, left thymus lobe; OFT, outflow tract; P, posterior; RPt, right parathyroid gland; RT, right thymus lobe; Th, thyroid gland; V, ventral.

Table 2

Proportion of thymus and parathyroid defects in each genotype

Kmt2d-cKO embryos have developmental delay of the fourth pharyngeal arch. Because of the abnormalities in the third pharyngeal pouch, we next examined the overall morphology of the pharyngeal apparatus for defects using H&E histological analysis at E10.5. At this stage, the third, fourth, and sixth pharyngeal arches have formed, although the sixth arch is small and difficult to detect even in normal embryos. The controls (Kmt2dfl/fl) had proper formation of the pharyngeal arches, which was visualized with frontal H&E-stained sections as well as with whole-mount PECAM1 and DAPI staining that shows the proper position of the third and fourth PAA lumens relative to their respective arches (Figure 5A). In cKO embryos these assessments revealed notable hypoplasia of fourth pharyngeal arch and clear absence of a fourth PAA lumen (Figure 5B). Sagittal view of DAPI-stained embryos at E10.5 similarly shows a decrease in third pharyngeal endoderm pouch size, as well as diminished distance between the pouches due to the absence of the fourth PAA (Supplemental Figure 6, C and D). Because of these structural differences, we wanted to assess the formation of the cranial nerves that correspond to each of the pharyngeal arches by performing whole-mount immunofluorescence using an antibody against βIII-tubulin. However, while some of the cKO embryos showed an increased incidence of fusion between cranial nerves IX and X compared with controls and cHets (Supplemental Figure 6, E and F), this variation was not fully penetrant and appeared in some of the controls as well (Supplemental Figure 6G). Thus, despite structural changes to the caudal pharyngeal apparatus at E10.5, there is limited impact on early cranial nerve patterning mediated by Kmt2d in the Tbx1 lineage. To clarify the nature of the abnormal pharyngeal morphology, we performed RNAscope on frontal E10.5 sections with probes for Epcam and Tbx1 to assess for proper pharyngeal epithelium morphogenesis and Tbx1 expression patterning, respectively. In addition to our Kmt2dfl/fl control (Figure 5C), we also used a Tbx1Cre/+ control (Figure 5D) to compare with cKO embryos (Figure 5E), as Tbx1 heterozygosity alone has been shown to cause pharyngeal apparatus structural changes with fourth PAA hypoplasia (43). The results showed Epcam expression marking the pharyngeal endoderm and ectoderm, with proper invagination of the third and fourth pouches, as well as comparable Tbx1 expression, among the 3 conditions. The DAPI staining, however, showed that there was hypoplasia of the cells within the fourth arch of the cKO embryos, consequently limiting the area occupied by the third pouch as compared with both the flox and Cre controls (illustration in Figure 5F). We therefore wanted to assess earlier expression of Tbx1 at E9.5, which is when the third pharyngeal arch has developed and the fourth is forming (44). Using whole-mount in situ experiments, we found that, compared with controls (Supplemental Figure 7, A and B), Tbx1 expression and/or the pharyngeal pouches appeared abnormal at the midline of the boundary between the third and fourth arches on both sides of the embryo (Supplemental Figure 7, C and D). Digital frontal sections were reconstructed from these images showing proper invagination of the third pharyngeal pouch (Supplemental Figure 7E) and prominent Tbx1 expression in the forming fourth pouch (Supplemental Figure 7F) in the control. The overall structure of the pharyngeal apparatus showed proper morphology when visualized with DAPI alone (Supplemental Figure 7G). In comparison, cKO embryos had delayed and/or incomplete formation of the third (Supplemental Figure 7H) and fourth (Supplemental Figure 7I) pharyngeal pouches, and fourth arch hypoplasia, which can be visualized with DAPI alone (Supplemental Figure 7J). While the expression of Tbx1 in the fourth pouch of cKO embryos at E9.5 did appear reduced, this is likely due to Tbx1 heterozygosity rather than the effects of Kmt2d inactivation; this is supported by qRT-PCR at E9.5 showing no significant difference between Tbx1 expression levels of Tbx1Cre/+ controls, cHets, and cKOs (Supplemental Figure 7K).

Kmt2d-cKO embryos have abnormal development of the third and fourth pharyngFigure 5

Kmt2d-cKO embryos have abnormal development of the third and fourth pharyngeal arches. (A) Frontal images of control (Kmt2dfl/fl) embryos at E10.5 showing proper formation of the third and fourth pharyngeal arches (PA) using H&E staining (n = 3) and whole-mount immunofluorescence with PECAM1 and DAPI (n = 5). (B) Frontal images of cKO embryos at E10.5 showing hypoplasia of the fourth PA using H&E staining (n = 3) and whole-mount immunofluorescence with PECAM1 and DAPI (n = 5). (C) Frontal RNAscope analysis of DAPI, Tbx1, and Epcam1 on a control embryo at E10.5 with single-channel magnified views of Epcam and Tbx1 (n = 5). (D) Frontal RNAscope of DAPI, Tbx1, and Epcam1 on a Tbx1Cre/+ embryo at E10.5 with single-channel magnified views of Epcam and Tbx1 (n = 4). (E) Frontal RNAscope of DAPI, Tbx1, and Epcam1 on a cKO embryo at E10.5 with single-channel magnified views of Epcam and Tbx1 (n = 5). (F) Illustration of the structural differences in the pharyngeal arches between control and cKO embryos. Scale bars: 250 μm. PA, pharyngeal arch; PP, pharyngeal pouch.

Single-cell transcriptomics reveals mild downregulation of genes with broad biological functions. To explain the molecular mechanism between the Kmt2d cHet versus cKO phenotype in the Tbx1 lineage, we used single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) to evaluate gene expression level changes. We performed the experiment at E9.5, because this is when Tbx1 expression is at its highest (21). The pharyngeal apparatus and heart from E9.5 embryos were microdissected, and Tbx1-lineage cells were purified using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (Supplemental Figure 8, A–C). We computationally integrated and clustered 2 replicates of cHet and cKO datasets (Supplemental Figure 8D) and identified 14 cell types using marker genes characterized in a previous report (21) (Figure 6, A and B, and Supplemental Figure 9, A–D). To calculate differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between cHet and cKO samples, we used the MAST (Model-based Analysis of Single-cell Transcriptomics) approach, a statistical framework that accounts for dropout and expression variation in scRNA-seq datasets (45). This revealed that the majority of the DEGs had low fold changes and that they function in a wide array of basic biological processes.

Single-cell RNA sequencing of cHet versus cKO embryos at E9.5 identifies diFigure 6

Single-cell RNA sequencing of cHet versus cKO embryos at E9.5 identifies differentially expressed genes in specific populations within the embryonic pharyngeal apparatus and heart. (A) Representative integrated UMAP of the 2 replicates of the scRNA-seq performed with cHet and cKO samples at E9.5. Clusters are labeled by color and were identified using known cell type markers. (B) Dot plot of the marker genes used to label the integrated cluster cell types. (C–F) Integrated UMAP plots of subcluster analysis of the epithelium (C), aSHF/cardiac muscle (D), MLPs (E), and endothelium (F). (G) Graph depicting the number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that were increased or decreased in expression within each subcluster. (H) Illustration of the results showing that DEGs of all cell subcluster populations (C–F) comprise varied biological processes, both increased and decreased in cKO embryos. aSHF, anterior second heart field; BrM, branchiomeric muscle; ECs, endothelial cells; MLPs, multilineage primed progenitors; OV, otic vesicle; pSHF, posterior second heart field.

To increase the resolution of the analysis, we performed subcluster analysis on some of the major cell types of the caudal pharyngeal arches, including the epithelium (Figure 6C), aSHF/cardiac muscle (Figure 6D), multilineage primed progenitors (MLPs) (Figure 6E), and the endothelium (Figure 6F). Most of the DEGs were decreased in expression in the 4 cell types assessed, a trend that was present across subclusters (Figure 6G). To determine the biological functions of these genes, analysis of all subclusters in the 4 selected cell types was performed, and these results are summarized in Figure 6H. Overall, we found both downregulated and upregulated DEGs whose gene products are involved in basic aspects of cellular homeostasis, including gene expression, signaling, metabolism, cell cycle regulation, protein modification, and ribosomal translation. Volcano plots were generated from the single-cell data to visualize the relative fold changes of DEGs and to highlight genes of interest (Figure 7). A full list of DEGs for each subcluster can be found in Supplemental Table 1. The epithelium (cluster 7) includes the pharyngeal pouch endoderm (subcluster 1), cleft ectoderm (subcluster 2), and otic vesicle (subcluster 3) as identified by cell type–specific marker genes (Figure 7A). The aSHF and cardiac muscle subclusters (clusters 8 and 14, respectively) are important contributors to the developing heart (Figure 7B). The MLPs (cluster 3) contribute to structures derived from the caudal pharyngeal arches, and we subdivided this cluster into posterior second heart field (pSHF; subcluster 1), facial (subcluster 2), aSHF (subcluster 3), and branchiomeric muscle (subcluster 4) cell types (Figure 7C and Supplemental Figure 9E). The endothelium contributes to the PAAs, so to assess underlying transcriptomic changes we subdivided it into mature (subclusters 1 and 2), progenitor (subcluster 3), and other (subcluster 4) endothelial cell types (Figure 7D and Supplemental Figure 9F). The predominance of mildly but significantly downregulated DEGs suggests that the loss of Kmt2d in the Tbx1 lineage leads to a subtle but broad shift in expression of genes constituting essential functional categories. Interestingly, neither Tbx1 nor Kmt2d had noteworthy changes in expression when the different clusters/cell types were compared across conditions (Supplemental Figure 10, A and B), suggesting that their relationship is cooperative rather than hierarchical.

Volcano plots from scRNA-seq show gene expression changes in cHet versus cKFigure 7

Volcano plots from scRNA-seq show gene expression changes in cHet versus cKO embryos at E9.5. (A) Volcano plots of the DEGs in the ectoderm and endoderm subclusters of the epithelium. (B) Volcano plots of the DEGs in the aSHF with cardiac muscle (aSHF/CM) subclusters. (C) Volcano plots of the aSHF and BrM subclusters of the MLPs. (D) Volcano plots of the DEGs in the mature (1 and 2) and progenitor EC subclusters of the endothelium. aSHF, anterior second heart field; BrM, branchiomeric muscle; ECs, endothelial cells; MLPs, multilineage primed progenitors.

Volcano plots from scRNA-seq show gene expression changes in cHet versus cKFigure 7

Volcano plots from scRNA-seq show gene expression changes in cHet versus cKO embryos at E9.5. (A) Volcano plots of the DEGs in the ectoderm and endoderm subclusters of the epithelium. (B) Volcano plots of the DEGs in the aSHF with cardiac muscle (aSHF/CM) subclusters. (C) Volcano plots of the aSHF and BrM subclusters of the MLPs. (D) Volcano plots of the DEGs in the mature (1 and 2) and progenitor EC subclusters of the endothelium. aSHF, anterior second heart field; BrM, branchiomeric muscle; ECs, endothelial cells; MLPs, multilineage primed progenitors.

Kmt2d and Tbx1 have shared and unique roles in the Tbx1 lineage. To ascertain whether Kmt2d can serve as a modifier of Tbx1, we reanalyzed scRNA-seq data from a study of Tbx1Cre/+ versus Tbx1Cre/fl (Tbx1-cKO) embryos in the same genetic background at E9.5 (21). These data consisted of one replicate each of pooled control and mutant embryos that we compared with our second replicate (Rep2) dataset as it had deeper sequencing and better overall cell quality. If Kmt2d modifies the Tbx1-cKO mutant phenotype, then we should observe some shared genes relevant to the general biological functions outlined above (Figure 7), and unique genes for the more severe phenotypes observed only in the Tbx1-cKO mutant embryos. We used the same pipeline and statistical methods to compare the MAST-derived DEGs from both datasets (Figure 8A). The cell clusters for the Tbx1-cKO dataset were identified using the same gene markers as those used in both Kmt2d-cKO datasets (Figure 8, B and C). We focused on the clusters consisting of epithelium, endothelium, aSHF, and MLPs to compare the shared and unique DEGs, as these were compelling based on our analysis and the known Tbx1 literature. The Kmt2d-cKO dataset had a much larger number of DEGs but with overall smaller fold changes compared with the Tbx1-cKO data; however, many of the DEGs overlapped between the 2 datasets and between clusters (Figure 8D). We therefore analyzed the overlapping Tbx1-cKO/Kmt2d-cKO DEGs that were identified in all 4 aforementioned clusters and found Gene Ontology (GO) terms largely related to transcription, cell cycle, and other homeostatic pathways (Figure 8E), thus mirroring the pattern of DEGs identified in the Kmt2d-cKO individual analysis. In the epithelium, we found that the DEGs that overlapped between the datasets were largely related to signaling, cell morphogenesis/proliferation, and cell junction (Figure 9A). The DEGs unique to the Tbx1-cKO epithelium (i.e., that were not also found in the Kmt2d cKO) showed differences that included GO functions related to regulation of signaling and focal adhesion. In the endothelium, we did not find any shared terms that were relevant to endothelial cells, but the Tbx1-cKO data were enriched for DEGs involved in blood vessel morphogenesis (Figure 9B). Similarly, the aSHF analysis revealed unique Tbx1-cKO DEGs relevant to OFT morphogenesis not found in the Kmt2d-cKO data (Figure 9C). Finally, analysis of the MLPs revealed a significant subset of DEGs unique to the Tbx1-cKO dataset that were identified in the original Tbx1-cKO study, confirming that there were substantial changes to gene expression in Tbx1-cKO embryos that were not present in the Kmt2d-cKO embryos (Figure 9D). This is expected given the discernibly less severe phenotype present in Kmt2d-cKO embryos compared with the Tbx1-cKO embryos. However, we then manually examined the overlapping DEGs in the MLPs for genes that are relevant to Tbx1 function. To do this, we compared them with a previously published list of 21 genes known to be heavily implicated in Tbx1 function as they have been identified across multiple datasets, including Tbx1-cKO MLP DEGs, Mesp1Cre-mediated Tbx1-dependent differentially accessible regions, and TBX1 ChIP-seq targets (21). Of the 21 intersected genes, 8 were present in the overlapped MLPs described here, indicating a possible intertwined role of Kmt2d with Tbx1 in these specific genetic pathways (Figure 9D). This is consistent with the clinical parallels between patients with 22q11DS or Kabuki syndrome, which have both shared and distinct phenotypes (Figure 9E). Thus, we confirm that there are some shared general biological processes between the Kmt2d-cKO and Tbx1-cKO datasets that may explain the subtle but remarkable ways in which Kmt2d modifies the phenotype of Tbx1 haploinsufficiency.

Comparison of the transcriptome from Kmt2d and Tbx1 datasets at E9.5.Figure 8

Comparison of the transcriptome from Kmt2d and Tbx1 datasets at E9.5. (A) Schematic of the method for comparing the DEGs in Kmt2d-cKO and Tbx1-cKO embryos. The MAST method was used to reanalyze Tbx1Cre versus Tbx1Cre/fl (Tbx1-cKO) scRNA-seq data from E9.5 embryos and to compare the resulting DEGs with the ones found in the dataset of the second replicate of the Kmt2d cKO (Rep2). (B) UMAP of the reanalysis of data from Tbx1-cKO embryos at E9.5 with cell cluster identification using the same marker genes as described above. (C) Dot plot of the marker genes used to label the integrated cluster cell types. (D) Graph of the different proportions of downregulated DEGs that are shared and unique to the different mutant embryos (Kmt2d cKO vs. Tbx1 cKO) in cell clusters that may contribute to observed phenotypes. (E) GO terms identified from the downregulated DEGs (n = 253) shared/overlapping between the epithelium, endothelium, aSHF, and MLPs of both datasets. aSHF, anterior second heart field; BrM, branchiomeric muscle; MLPs, multilineage primed progenitors; pSHF, posterior second heart field.

Kmt2d and Tbx1 have shared and separate functions in the Tbx1 lineage at E9Figure 9

Kmt2d and Tbx1 have shared and separate functions in the Tbx1 lineage at E9.5. The orange circles in each panel represent DEGs in Kmt2d-cKO embryos, whereas the green circles represent DEGs in Tbx1-cKO embryos. The intersection of the two circles is in purple and represents shared DEGs. The color of the arrows indicates the source of the highlighted DEGs. (A) Comparative analysis of the epithelial cell clusters reveals shared GO terms related to cell proliferation and migration. Gene sets unique to the Tbx1-cKO embryos include focal adhesion and regulation of signaling. (B) The overlap of DEGs in the Tbx1- and Kmt2d-cKO endothelium reveals no shared DEGs relevant to endothelial cell function. The Tbx1-cKO data had unique DEGs enriched for blood cell morphogenesis. (C) Comparative analysis of the aSHF data shows a subset of DEGs related to cardiac OFT morphogenesis that are unique to the Tbx1-cKO dataset. (D) Comparison of the DEGs found in the MLPs reveals a significant proportion of known Tbx1-associated genes that are unique to the Tbx1-cKO data. However, manual assessment of the overlapped genes between the two datasets revealed Tbx1-associated genes that are also known to intersect with other relevant datasets. (E) Venn diagram showing a comparison of the phenotypes between Kabuki syndrome and 22q11.2DS. There is large overlap in the impacted systems, but the classical clinical presentation for each syndrome is distinct. aSHF, anterior second heart field; DARs, differentially accessible regions; MLPs, multilineage primed progenitors; OFT, outflow tract; PAA, pharyngeal arch artery.

Discussion

When considering the syndromic presentation of 22q11.2DS and Kabuki syndrome, the overall phenotypic similarities in patients are evident, with overlap in many systems including, but not limited to craniofacial/skeletal, immune, endocrine, and cardiac. Despite this, the stereotypical manifestations differ between syndromes. Recent genomic analysis of patients with 22q11.2DS identified KMT2D among a list of chromatin modifier genes that may interact with TBX1 to modulate cardiac phenotypic severity (5). Further, when we revisited the clinical manifestations of the 2 patients with KMT2D variants from this 22q11.2DS cohort, we found that, aside from CTDs, both presented with thymic atrophy/aplasia and velopharyngeal anomalies. These are phenotypes observed in 22q11.2DS, Kabuki syndrome, and the Kmt2d-cKO model described here, further illustrating that TBX1 and KMT2D function within overlapping developmental programs. In this study we found evidence that Kmt2d is essential in the Tbx1 lineage of the pharyngeal apparatus, such that its absence in this lineage during development leads to a spectrum of phenotypes that resemble mouse models of 22q11.2DS. The observed defects in cKO embryos, particularly of the thymus/parathyroid glands and aortic arch, result from a developmental delay of the caudal pharyngeal apparatus. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis demonstrates that this is likely due to the convergent roles in downstream gene regulation of shared biological processes, particularly affecting the pharyngeal epithelia, SHF mesoderm, and MLPs. Overall, our data, along with previous human genetic studies (5), show that Kmt2d serves as a modifier gene of select Tbx1 functions in pharyngeal phenotypes.

Both Kmt2d-cKO and Tbx1-null (or Tbx1Cre/fl) embryos die perinatally, indicating essential developmental impacts on survival. The Tbx1-null embryos have phenotypes that readily explain perinatal lethality, including an overt cleft palate, absence of the hyoid bone, and a PTA with or without VSD (46). The definitive cause of lethality in Kmt2d-cKO neonates, however, was more difficult to establish, as the presenting phenotypes are fewer and milder. Assessment of cKO micro-CTs at E17.5 ruled out the aforementioned defects found in Tbx1 nulls but revealed mild craniofacial differences of the face, palate, and mandible. Interestingly, similar and more severe phenotypes have been observed in Tbx1 and Kmt2d mouse models, as well as in patients with 22q11.2DS and Kabuki syndrome (1, 47–49). The absence of milk in the stomachs of the cKO neonates at the end of P0, along with mild defects of the secondary palate, suggest a suckling defect and consequent lethality due to malnutrition. Feeding difficulties could also result from pharyngeal muscle hypotonia and/or cranial nerve IX and X defects, which occur in Tbx1-null embryos (44, 50). It is therefore possible that a combination of mild craniofacial and cranial nerve irregularities contributes to the perinatal lethality in cKO embryos, although our assessment of the cranial nerves at E10.5 was unremarkable. In addition to craniofacial abnormalities, we identified a subset of cKO pups that die early in P0 as a result of IAAB and possible cardiac IVS defects, the latter of which have been previously exhibited in some Kmt2d mouse models (25).

Global loss of Kmt2d results in early embryonic lethality, conveying the ubiquitous role that it plays in development and the need for conditional inactivation to study its specific functions (25). Kmt2d inactivation using Mef2c-AHF-Cre has been shown to result in mid-gestational lethality with a PTA and IVS defects (25). We therefore expected that loss of Kmt2d in the Tbx1 lineage would result in a PTA, as the Tbx1Cre and Mef2c-AHF-Cre lineages overlap in the SHF and Tbx1-null mutants have a fully penetrant PTA (44, 51). Possible functional redundancy was addressed by conditional inactivation of both Kmt2d and its paralog Kmt2c, but OFT defects were still not observed. A subset of our Kmt2d-cKO embryos, however, did have structural defects of the RV and IVS myocardium, a phenotype that we then observed with reduced penetrance in Tbx1-null embryos. These intracardiac defects, particularly disorganization of the IVS, are reminiscent of the Mef2c-AHF-Cre Kmt2d-cKO phenotype (25). Thus, our data support function of Kmt2d within these cells and reveal a previously reported but understudied role of the contribution of the Tbx1 lineage to the RV and IVS myocardium in the apex of the heart (26, 31, 32). Mild myocardial hypoplasia has been shown to cause perinatal lethality (52), possibly explaining how these cardiac defects, in addition to IAAB, can cause a subset of the lethality that occurs early in P0. We suggest that the relatively mild cardiac phenotype in cKO embryos using Tbx1Cre is due to the timing and cell type differences of the Tbx1Cre expression domain and lineage.

The aortic branching phenotypes that we observed are characteristic of those seen in Tbx1 mutants as they originate from fourth PAA defects early in development. In fact, in studies testing for compound heterozygosity of Tbx1 with other genes, increased penetrance of fourth PAA defects is often used as an indicator of a genetic interaction in double-heterozygous embryos (8, 53–55). Thus, the delicate balance in Tbx1 heterozygosity, which results in partially penetrant fourth PAA defects and subsequent aortic arch anomalies (17), is further compromised by insult to additional genes that act downstream or in the same pathway. We observed this in the Kmt2d-cHet embryos, which, despite not having an increased frequency of fourth PAA defects compared with Tbx1 heterozygotes, displayed low penetrance of RERSA not seen in the Tbx1Cre/+ embryos in a mixed genetic background. Further, we observed that 100% of cKO embryos had fourth PAA defects, while late-stage embryos displayed RERSA and IAAB at reduced penetrance. As with other mouse models, there is recovery of fourth PAA defects during embryogenesis (17, 35, 56), but it can be observed here that reduced dosage of Kmt2d attenuates this mechanism. The absence of fourth PAA defects when Kmt2d is conditionally inactivated in the Mef2c-AHF-Cre lineage further affirms that the function of Kmt2d in the fourth PAAs is via interaction in the Tbx1 lineage.

As fourth PAA formation is mediated via non-cell-autonomous signaling from the pharyngeal epithelia to mesenchymal cell types that include the SHF and NCCs (57), it is likely that there is cooperation of Tbx1 and Kmt2d in this tissue. The pharyngeal epithelia are composed of endoderm and ectoderm within the pharyngeal apparatus, which invaginate to form pouches and clefts, respectively. Morphological assessment of the cKO embryos at E9.5 and E10.5 supports developmental dysmorphism and/or hypoplasia of the third pharyngeal pouch and fourth pharyngeal arch. While overall Tbx1 expression levels were unchanged, its patterning was notably aberrant in the pharyngeal arches of cKO embryos at E9.5, consistent with the structural anomalies observed at E10.5. Further, Epcam expression at E10.5 revealed proper pouch invagination but highlighted the diminished area occupied by the third pharyngeal pouch due to fourth pharyngeal arch hypoplasia. The diminutive third pharyngeal pouch likely contributes to the reduced expression of Foxn1 and Gcm2, markers for specific domains of the pouch that correspond to precursors of the thymus and parathyroid glands that were ectopic and/or hypoplastic at later developmental stages. Interestingly, the right lobe of the thymus was more severely impacted than the left, consistent with reports that left-right asymmetry, which normally occurs during development, is particularly exaggerated in phenotypes affecting pharyngeal structures (58).

To elucidate the mechanism behind the defects of the cKO, we performed scRNA-seq of cHet versus cKO embryos at E9.5 to identify specific genes that could be implicated in the phenotypic presentation. However, instead of standout genes with dramatically altered fold changes, we discovered many DEGs with small but significant changes that centered around basic homeostatic pathways. Our analysis largely focused on the main tissues of interest for the role of Tbx1 in the pharyngeal region, including the epithelium, endothelium, aSHF, and MLPs. Overwhelmingly the DEGs, which were mostly downregulated, fell into categories of genes involved in gene expression, cell cycle regulation, and signaling transduction. Rather than implicating specific tissue types as causative of defects, the data of the integrated replicates pointed to a global and diffuse effect of the Kmt2d cKO, suggesting that the interplay of Kmt2d and Tbx1 is multifaceted. This has been shown in other models of impaired chromatin regulation, which cause subtle but global effects on overall gene expression (59, 60). Our comparison of the scRNA-seq datasets between Kmt2d- and Tbx1-conditional-null embryos in the Tbx1 lineage further supports this, as we identified similar GO terms upon analysis of the overlapping DEGs across the aforementioned clusters. What was particularly compelling about this analysis, however, was not just the pathways that were shared between the 2 datasets, but also those that were unique to the Tbx1 cKO. This identified genes relevant to focal adhesion in the epithelium, blood vessel morphogenesis in the endothelium, OFT morphogenesis in the aSHF, and known Tbx1-associated genes in the MLPs. Since the phenotypes of the 2 models impact the same systems but with different severity, identifying these DEGs specific to the Tbx1 cKO could shed light on genes that are most crucial in driving phenotypic presentation.

We depict a potential interplay of Kmt2d and Tbx1 in Figure 10. In our previous TBX1 ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq studies, we found that TBX1 largely binds and opens chromatin at intergenic regions that include putative enhancers (21). TBX1 has also been shown to positively regulate H3K4 monomethylation and directly interact with KMT2C (61), suggesting that cooperation between KMT2D and TBX1 is likely localized to enhancer regions, allowing for recruitment of transcriptional machinery for the activation of downstream genes. Thus, reduced dosage of either gene leads to increased phenotypic severity. This is supported by our scRNA-seq data, as prominent downregulated DEGs across the different cell types were related to transcriptional machinery known to interact with KMT2D (10, 62). Furthermore, Tbx1 functions with many of these complexes in its role as a transcription factor and has been shown to directly interact with some of them in early development (8, 63). In the same vein, we saw downregulation of genes involved in translational processes that are known to be targets of chromatin regulators in different developmental contexts, such as how KMT2D has been shown to be important for ribosomal protein regulation (64, 65). Finally, cell cycle/proliferation genes were downregulated, which is interesting since studies on Kmt2d pathogenesis in Kabuki syndrome show that its loss leads to a decrease in cell proliferation and cell cycle activity (66, 67).

Molecular summary of Kmt2d and Tbx1 interactions in mouse embryos.Figure 10

Molecular summary of Kmt2d and Tbx1 interactions in mouse embryos. Model of how reduced gene dosage of Tbx1 and/or Kmt2d impacts downstream pathways involved in embryonic development.

Thus, the phenotype in Kmt2d-cKO embryos resembles an intermediate between Tbx1-heterozygous and -null mouse models, both phenotypically and genotypically. The defects observed in the P0 cKO pups result from abnormal pharyngeal arch morphology in early development and resemble other mouse models of 22q11.2DS. In this way, conditional inactivation of Kmt2d acts to provoke the developmental landscape of the Tbx1 heterozygote, which otherwise has un-noteworthy phenotypes in a mixed background, to present with mild but lethal defects. This mirrors the data from the human study, which shows that variations in chromatin regulatory genes, including KMT2D, can explain severe cardiac presentations in patients with 22q11.2DS/TBX1 haploinsufficiency. It also highlights notable similarities in the clinical presentations of 22q11.2DS and Kabuki syndrome, emphasizing the importance of expanding gene and protein networks to help clarify genotype/phenotype correlations. Ultimately, the identification of genetic modifiers of developmental pathology will allow us to further home in on the precision medicine needed to provide patients with improved diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes.

Methods

Sex as a biological variable. Sex was not considered as a biological variable, as studies were conducted on embryos or newborn pups before morphological sexual characteristics can be determined.

Mouse strains. Kmt2dfl/fl mice (68), Rosa26-Gfpfl/fl mice (69), Kmt2cfl/fl (exon 3) mice (34), Kmt2cΔfl/fl (SET domain) mice (33), Tbx1Cre mice (26), Mef2c-AHF-Cre mice (70), and Mesp1Cre mice (71) have been previously described. All mice were backcrossed into a Swiss Webster background and then maintained in a mixed background (C57BL/6, Swiss Webster) unless otherwise described.

qRT-PCR. Cell preparation for qRT-PCR is described in Supplemental Methods. Total RNA was isolated from FACS-purified E9.5 embryos using the Arcturus PicoPure RNA Isolation Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, KIT0204). cDNA was generated using the SuperScript IV First-Strand Synthesis System (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and qRT-PCR reactions were performed in triplicate using the Power SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) and run on a 7900HT Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). Relative abundance of mRNAs was calculated by normalization to Gapdh mRNA levels. Primer sequences for Gapdh (72), Tbx1 (73), and Kmt2d (25) have been previously described.

Histology. Embryos were generated from timed mating, and morning-time vaginal plug detection was considered as E0.5. For embryos at stage E11 or younger, somite count was used to confirm staging: E9.5 (23–28 somites), E10.5 (34–39 somites), E11 (40–45 somites). Embryos at stage E11.5 and earlier were collected in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24–36 hours at 4°C. Embryos at E15.5 and above were fixed in 10% buffered formalin. After fixation, embryos were dehydrated through ethanol series (70%, 90%, 100%), cleared in xylene, and embedded in paraffin wax. The thickness of all paraffin sections was 10 μm, aside from whole embryos older than E15.5, which were sectioned at 12 μm. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining on histological sections was performed in the Molecular Cytogenetics Core at Albert Einstein College of Medicine using standard protocols.

Immunofluorescence on cryosections. Immunofluorescence on cryosections was performed as previously described (24) using primary antibody GFP (Abcam, ab6673; 1:500, goat) and secondary antibody Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen, A32723; 1:200). Images were taken using a Zeiss Axio Observer microscope with an apotome.

Micro–computed tomography imaging and analysis of embryos. Freshly collected E17.5 embryos and P0 neonates were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4°C and transferred into PBS. In preparation for imaging, embryos and neonates were rinsed in 70% ethanol, air-dried for 5 minutes, and then placed on custom styrofoam beds that held the samples in a semi-upright posture. The specimens were then individually imaged using a Skyscan model 1275 micro–computed tomograph (micro-CT; Bruker BioSpin Corp.). Further imaging parameters and settings can be found in Supplemental Methods.

Immunofluorescence on whole mount. Whole-mount immunofluorescence was performed based on previous protocols (74) and as described in Supplemental Methods.

Primary antibodies included anti–βIII-tubulin (Abcam, ab18207; 1:1,000), anti-CD31 (BD Biosciences, bd550274; 1:100), and anti-GFP (Abcam, ab6673; 1:100). Embryos were imaged using the Nikon CSU-W1 Spinning Disk confocal microscope from the Analytical Imaging Facility at Albert Einstein College of Medicine. Images were then processed using Imaris Viewer version 10.0.0 (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK).

India ink injection. Fresh E10.5 embryos were dissected in PBS, and a solution containing 50% ink and 50% PBS was injected with India ink into the left ventricle using a microcapillary connected to an aspirator tube assembly. Imaging was performed using a Leica MX125 stereomicroscope.

RNAscope on paraffin sections. RNAscope in situ hybridization was performed on paraffin sections according to the manufacturer instructions (Advanced Cell Diagnostics, https://acdbio.com/ebook/introduction/rnascope-workflow) with standard tissue pretreatment recommendations and manual target retrieval. Briefly, E10.5 embryos were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C followed by ethanol dehydration and paraffin embedding. Sections of 8–10 μm were hybridized with RNAscope probes Mm-Tbx1 (Advanced Cell Diagnostics, 481911-C1), Mm-Foxn1 (Advanced Cell Diagnostics, 482021-C2), and Mm-Gcm2 (Advanced Cell Diagnostics, 530481-C3) using Multiplex Fluorescent Detection Reagents v2 (Advanced Cell Diagnostics, 323110). Detection of fluorescent signal was performed using tyramide signal amplification with Cy3, Cy5, and fluorescein, and sections were imaged using a Zeiss Axio Observer microscope with an apotome.

Whole-mount RNAscope experiments. RNAscope on whole-mount E9.5 embryos was performed as previously described (75) using Multiplex Fluorescent Detection Reagents v2 (Advanced Cell Diagnostics, 323110) and RNAscope probe Mm-Tbx1 (Advanced Cell Diagnostics, 481911-C1).

Single-cell RNA-seq. Single-cell sample preparation was performed as previously described (75) with further information in Supplemental Methods. Sequencing of the libraries was performed using an Illumina NovaSeq system (Azenta, South Plainfield, New Jersey, USA) with paired-end 150 bp read length.

Single-cell RNA-seq analysis. For each sample, the FASTQ files were processed using Cell Ranger version 8.0.1 to generate gene-by-cell count matrices. We then processed samples using scDAPP software version 1.2.0 (76), which integrates Seurat software version 5.1.0 (77) for individual clustering with RISC software version 1.7. Detailed analysis parameters and information can be found in Supplemental Methods. The final data were processed with ShinyCell (78) v1 for ease of community data sharing and can be accessed at https://scviewer.shinyapps.io/Kmt2d_and_Tbx1/

Statistics. Data were plotted using GraphPad Prism 10 software, and Student’s t test (unpaired, 2-tailed) or 3-way ANOVA was used to compare groups, with P < 0.05 considered significant.

Study approval. No data from human subjects were used in this study. All mouse studies were carried out according to NIH protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Albert Einstein College of Medicine (protocol 00001034).

Data availability. All scRNA-seq datasets generated in this study were deposited in the NIH Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under the accession number GSE299068. All other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplemental material, including the Supporting Data Values file, or upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.

Author contributions

DM performed the mouse genetic studies, phenotypic analysis, and scRNA-seq and wrote the manuscript. KJ performed the scRNA-seq data analysis and generated relevant figures. TCC performed and analyzed the micro-CT scans. BEM led the project and edited the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Funding support

This work is the result of NIH funding, in whole or in part, and is subject to the NIH Public Access Policy. Through acceptance of this federal funding, the NIH has been given a right to make the work publicly available in PubMed Central.

  • NIH grants F30HL172604 to DM, F31HL180025 to KJ, R01HL157157 to BEM, and T32HL144456 and T32GM007288 to DM.
  • Leducq Foundation 15CVD01 to BEM.
  • Stowers Family Endowment for Dental & Musculoskeletal Tissue Research and the Langford Family Trust to TCC.
Supplemental material

View Supplemental data

View Supplemental table 1

View Supporting data values

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge support from the Genomics Core, Molecular Cytogenetics Core, Analytical Imaging Facility, and Flow Cytometry Core at Albert Einstein College of Medicine. We thank Christopher De Bono for his assistance in performing the India ink injections and Thomas Maynard for his helpful suggestions for cranial nerve assessment. We thank Donna McDonald McGinn, Bekah Wang, and Stephan Eliez for their assistance in providing the phenotypic information for patients with our variants of interest. We are grateful to Deyou Zheng and Xiang Yu Zheng for bioinformatics consultation and assistance. Special thanks to Sophie Astrof for her contribution of the Mef2c-AHF-Cre/+ mice.

Address correspondence to: Bernice E. Morrow, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1301 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, New York 10461, USA. Email: Bernice.morrow@einsteinmed.edu.

Footnotes

Copyright: © 2026, Miller et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reference information: JCI Insight. 2026;11(16):e206763.https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.206763.

References
  1. McDonald-McGinn DM, et al. 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015;1(1):15071.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Morrow BE, et al. Molecular genetics of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2018;176(10):2070–2081.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Unolt M, et al. Congenital heart diseases and cardiovascular abnormalities in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: from well-established knowledge to new frontiers. Am J Med Genet A. 2018;176(10):2087–2098.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Minikel EV, et al. Evaluating drug targets through human loss-of-function genetic variation. Nature. 2020;581(7809):459–464.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Zhao Y, et al. Chromatin regulators in the TBX1 network confer risk for conotruncal heart defects in 22q11.2DS. NPJ Genom Med. 2023;8(1):17.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Zaidi S, et al. De novo mutations in histone-modifying genes in congenital heart disease. Nature. 2013;498(7453):220–223.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Voss K, et al. MOZ regulates the Tbx1 locus, and Moz mutation partially phenocopies DiGeorge syndrome. Dev Cell. 2012;23(3):652–663.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Randall V, et al. Great vessel development requires biallelic expression of Chd7 and Tbx1 in pharyngeal ectoderm in mice. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(11):3301–3310.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Caprio C, et al. EZH2 is required for parathyroid and thymic development through differentiation of the third pharyngeal pouch endoderm. Dis Model Mech. 2021;14(3):dmm046789.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Froimchuk E, et al. Histone H3 lysine 4 methyltransferase KMT2D. Gene. 2017;627:337–342.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Digilio MC, et al. Congenital heart defects in molecularly proven Kabuki syndrome patients. Am J Med Genet A. 2017;173(11):2912–2922.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Barry KK, et al. From genotype to phenotype—a review of Kabuki syndrome. Genes (Basel). 2022;13(10):1761.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Liao J, et al. Full spectrum of malformations in velo-cardio-facial syndrome/DiGeorge syndrome mouse models by altering Tbx1 dosage. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13(15):1577–1585.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Gao S, et al. Understanding the role of Tbx1 as a candidate gene for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2013;13(6):613–621.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Xu H, et al. Timed mutation and cell-fate mapping reveal reiterated roles of Tbx1 during embryogenesis, and a crucial function during segmentation of the pharyngeal system via regulation of endoderm expansion. Development. 2005;132(19):4387–4395.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Scambler PJ. 22q11 deletion syndrome: a role for TBX1 in pharyngeal and cardiovascular development. Pediatr Cardiol. 2010;31(3):378–390.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Lindsay EA, et al. Tbx1 haploinsufficiency in the DiGeorge syndrome region causes aortic arch defects in mice. Nature. 2001;410(6824):97–101.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  18. Jerome LA, Papaioannou VE. DiGeorge syndrome phenotype in mice mutant for the T-box gene, Tbx1. Nat Genet. 2001;27(3):286–291.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Shone V, Graham A. Endodermal/ectodermal interfaces during pharyngeal segmentation in vertebrates. J Anat. 2014;225(5):479–491.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Graham A, Richardson J. Developmental and evolutionary origins of the pharyngeal apparatus. Evodevo. 2012;3(1):24.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Nomaru H, et al. Single cell multi-omic analysis identifies a Tbx1-dependent multilineage primed population in murine cardiopharyngeal mesoderm. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):6645.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Arnold JS, et al. Inactivation of Tbx1 in the pharyngeal endoderm results in 22q11DS malformations. Development. 2006;133(5):977–987.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Vitelli F, et al. Tbx1 mutation causes multiple cardiovascular defects and disrupts neural crest and cranial nerve migratory pathways. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11(8):915–922.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Hasten E, Morrow BE. Tbx1 and Foxi3 genetically interact in the pharyngeal pouch endoderm in a mouse model for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. PLoS Genet. 2019;15(8):e1008301.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Ang SY, et al. KMT2D regulates specific programs in heart development via histone H3 lysine 4 di-methylation. Development. 2016;143(5):810–821.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Huynh T, et al. A fate map of Tbx1 expressing cells reveals heterogeneity in the second cardiac field. Genesis. 2007;45(7):470–475.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Dhar SS, et al. Trans-tail regulation of MLL4-catalyzed H3K4 methylation by H4R3 symmetric dimethylation is mediated by a tandem PHD of MLL4. Genes Dev. 2012;26(24):2749–2762.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Funato N, et al. Loss of Tbx1 induces bone phenotypes similar to cleidocranial dysplasia. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(2):424–435.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  29. Turgeon B, Meloche S. Interpreting neonatal lethal phenotypes in mouse mutants: insights into gene function and human diseases. Physiol Rev. 2009;89(1):1–26.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Dyce O, et al. Otolaryngologic manifestations of the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128(12):1408–1412.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  31. Martucciello S, et al. A dual role for Tbx1 in cardiac lymphangiogenesis through genetic interaction with Vegfr3. FASEB J. 2020;34(11):15062–15079.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  32. Liao J, et al. Identification of downstream genetic pathways of Tbx1 in the second heart field. Dev Biol. 2008;316(2):524–537.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  33. Jang Y, et al. H3.3K4M destabilizes enhancer H3K4 methyltransferases MLL3/MLL4 and impairs adipose tissue development. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(2):607–620.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  34. Chen R, et al. Kmt2c mutations enhance HSC self-renewal capacity and convey a selective advantage after chemotherapy. Cell Rep. 2021;34(7):108751.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  35. Ramirez A, et al. Buffering mechanism in aortic arch artery formation and congenital heart disease. Circ Res. 2024;134(10):e112–e132.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Jonas RA, et al. Outcomes in patients with interrupted aortic arch and ventricular septal defect. A multiinstitutional study. Congenital Heart Surgeons Society. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;107(4):1099–1109.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  37. Anderson RH, Bamforth SD. Morphogenesis of the mammalian aortic arch arteries. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:892900.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Wang X, et al. Endothelium in the pharyngeal arches 3, 4 and 6 is derived from the second heart field. Dev Biol. 2017;421(2):108–117.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Zhang Z, et al. Tbx1 expression in pharyngeal epithelia is necessary for pharyngeal arch artery development. Development. 2005;132(23):5307–5315.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  40. Merscher S, et al. TBX1 is responsible for cardiovascular defects in velo-cardio-facial/DiGeorge syndrome. Cell. 2001;104(4):619–629.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Farley AM, et al. Thymic epithelial cell fate and potency in early organogenesis assessed by single cell transcriptional and functional analysis. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1202163.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  42. Gordon J, et al. Gcm2 and Foxn1 mark early parathyroid- and thymus-specific domains in the developing third pharyngeal pouch. Mech Dev. 2001;103(1–2):141–143.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  43. Okubo T, et al. Ripply3, a Tbx1 repressor, is required for development of the pharyngeal apparatus and its derivatives in mice. Development. 2011;138(2):339–348.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  44. Vitelli F. Tbx1 mutation causes multiple cardiovascular defects and disrupts neural crest and cranial nerve migratory pathways. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11(8):915–922.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  45. Finak G, et al. MAST: a flexible statistical framework for assessing transcriptional changes and characterizing heterogeneity in single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol. 2015;16(1):278.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  46. Funato N, et al. Tbx1 regulates oral epithelial adhesion and palatal development. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21(11):2524–2537.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  47. Aggarwal VS, et al. Mesodermal Tbx1 is required for patterning the proximal mandible in mice. Dev Biol. 2010;344(2):669–681.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  48. Shpargel KB, et al. The KMT2D Kabuki syndrome histone methylase controls neural crest cell differentiation and facial morphology. Development. 2020;147(21):dev187997.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  49. Cheon CK, Ko JM. Kabuki syndrome: clinical and molecular characteristics. Korean J Pediatr. 2015;58(9):317–324.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  50. Erman A, et al. Disorders of cranial nerves IX and X. Semin Neurol. 2009;29(1):85–92.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  51. Hasten E, et al. Dysregulation of TBX1 dosage in the anterior heart field results in congenital heart disease resembling the 22q11.2 duplication syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2018;27(11):1847–1857.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  52. Zou J, et al. Neddylation mediates ventricular chamber maturation through repression of Hippo signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(17):E4101–E4110.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  53. Guris DL, et al. Dose-dependent interaction of Tbx1 and Crkl and locally aberrant RA signaling in a model of del22q11 syndrome. Dev Cell. 2006;10(1):81–92.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  54. Vitelli F, et al. A genetic link between Tbx1 and fibroblast growth factor signaling. Development. 2002;129(19):4605–4611.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  55. Calmont AL, et al. Tbx1 controls cardiac neural crest cell migration during arch artery development by regulating Gbx2 expression in the pharyngeal ectoderm. Development. 2009;136(18):3173–3183.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  56. Lindsay EA, Baldini A. Recovery from arterial growth delay reduces penetrance of cardiovascular defects in mice deleted for the DiGeorge syndrome region. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10(9):997–1002.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  57. Wei L, et al. Pharyngeal epithelial deletion of Tbx1 causes caudal pharyngeal arch defect but not cardiac conotruncal anomaly. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020;533(4):1315–1322.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  58. Gordon J, et al. Evidence for an early role for BMP4 signaling in thymus and parathyroid morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 2010;339(1):141–154.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  59. Perkins ML, et al. Chromatin enables precise and scalable gene regulation with factors of limited specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025;122(1):e2411887121.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  60. Mitra A, et al. Soft repression: subtle transcriptional regulation with global impact. Bioessays. 2021;43(2):e2000231.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  61. Fulcoli FG, et al. Rebalancing gene haploinsufficiency in vivo by targeting chromatin. Nat Commun. 2016;7(1):11688.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  62. Park YK, et al. Interplay of BAF and MLL4 promotes cell type-specific enhancer activation. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1630.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  63. Stoller JZ, et al. Ash2l interacts with Tbx1 and is required during early embryogenesis. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2010;235(5):569–576.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  64. Yheskel M, et al. KDM5-mediated transcriptional activation of ribosomal protein genes alters translation efficiency to regulate mitochondrial metabolism in neurons. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52(11):6201–6219.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  65. Tsang E, et al. Ketogenic diet modifies ribosomal protein dysregulation in KMT2D Kabuki syndrome. EBioMedicine. 2024;104:105156.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  66. Shangguan H, et al. Knockdown of Kmt2d leads to growth impairment by activating the Akt/β-catenin signaling pathway. G3 (Bethesda). 2024;14(3):jkad298.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  67. Pang L, et al. KMT2D deficiency disturbs the proliferation and cell cycle activity of dental epithelial cell line (LS8) partially via Wnt signaling. Biosci Rep. 2021;41(11):BSR20211148.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  68. Lee JE, et al. H3K4 mono- and di-methyltransferase MLL4 is required for enhancer activation during cell differentiation. Elife. 2013;2:e01503.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  69. Mao X, et al. Activation of EGFP expression by Cre-mediated excision in a new ROSA26 reporter mouse strain. Blood. 2001;97(1):324–326.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  70. Verzi MP, et al. The right ventricle, outflow tract, and ventricular septum comprise a restricted expression domain within the secondary/anterior heart field. Dev Biol. 2005;287(1):134–145.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  71. Saga Y, et al. MesP1 is expressed in the heart precursor cells and required for the formation of a single heart tube. Development. 1999;126(15):3437–3447.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  72. Song H, Morrow BE. Tbx2 and Tbx3 regulate cell fate progression of the otic vesicle for inner ear development. Dev Biol. 2023;494:71–84.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  73. Simrick S, et al. Biallelic expression of Tbx1 protects the embryo from developmental defects caused by increased receptor tyrosine kinase signaling. Dev Dyn. 2012;241(8):1310–1324.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  74. Ramirez A, Astrof S. Visualization and analysis of pharyngeal arch arteries using whole-mount immunohistochemistry and 3D reconstruction. J Vis Exp. 2020;(157):10.3791/60797.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  75. De Bono C, et al. Single-cell transcriptomics uncovers a non-autonomous Tbx1-dependent genetic program controlling cardiac neural crest cell development. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):1551.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  76. Ferrena A, et al. scDAPP: a comprehensive single-cell transcriptomics analysis pipeline optimized for cross-group comparison. NAR Genom Bioinform. 2024;6(4):lqae134.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  77. Hao Y, et al. Dictionary learning for integrative, multimodal and scalable single-cell analysis. Nat Biotechnol. 2024;42(2):293–304.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  78. Ouyang JF, et al. ShinyCell: simple and sharable visualization of single-cell gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2021;37(19):3374–3376.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (August 24, 2026): Electronic publication

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Conflict of interest
  • Funding support
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts