Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Funding support
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article
Advertisement

Research ArticleCell biologyMuscle biology Open Access | 10.1172/jci.insight.200054

DAB2 in LGMD R2: a molecular link between disease progression and lipid dysregulation

Celine Bruge,1,2 Nathalie Bourg,3 Emilie Pellier,1,2 Quentin Miagoux,1,2 Manon Benabides,1,2 Noella Grossi,1,2 Hassan Hayat,1,2 Margot Jarrige,1,2 Helene Polveche,1,2 Valeria Agostini,3 Anthony Brureau,3 Stephane Vassilopoulos,4 Teresinha Evangelista,5,6 Gorka Fernández-Eulate,6 Tanya Stojkovic,6 Isabelle Richard,3 and Xavier Nissan1,2

1Université Paris-Saclay, Université d’Evry, Inserm, IStem, UMR861, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

2IStem, CECS, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

3INTEGRARE, Genethon, Inserm, Université d’Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France.

4Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, UMRS974, Paris, France.

5Unité de Morphologie Neuromusculaire, Institut de Myologie, Sorbonne université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France.

6Centre de Référence des maladies Neuromusculaires Nord/Est/Ile-de-France, Institut de Myologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France.

Address correspondence to: Xavier Nissan, 28 rue Henri Desbruères 91100 Corbeil Essonnes, France. Email: xnissan@istem.fr.

Find articles by Bruge, C. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Université Paris-Saclay, Université d’Evry, Inserm, IStem, UMR861, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

2IStem, CECS, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

3INTEGRARE, Genethon, Inserm, Université d’Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France.

4Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, UMRS974, Paris, France.

5Unité de Morphologie Neuromusculaire, Institut de Myologie, Sorbonne université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France.

6Centre de Référence des maladies Neuromusculaires Nord/Est/Ile-de-France, Institut de Myologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France.

Address correspondence to: Xavier Nissan, 28 rue Henri Desbruères 91100 Corbeil Essonnes, France. Email: xnissan@istem.fr.

Find articles by Bourg, N. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Université Paris-Saclay, Université d’Evry, Inserm, IStem, UMR861, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

2IStem, CECS, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

3INTEGRARE, Genethon, Inserm, Université d’Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France.

4Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, UMRS974, Paris, France.

5Unité de Morphologie Neuromusculaire, Institut de Myologie, Sorbonne université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France.

6Centre de Référence des maladies Neuromusculaires Nord/Est/Ile-de-France, Institut de Myologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France.

Address correspondence to: Xavier Nissan, 28 rue Henri Desbruères 91100 Corbeil Essonnes, France. Email: xnissan@istem.fr.

Find articles by Pellier, E. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Université Paris-Saclay, Université d’Evry, Inserm, IStem, UMR861, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

2IStem, CECS, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

3INTEGRARE, Genethon, Inserm, Université d’Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France.

4Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, UMRS974, Paris, France.

5Unité de Morphologie Neuromusculaire, Institut de Myologie, Sorbonne université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France.

6Centre de Référence des maladies Neuromusculaires Nord/Est/Ile-de-France, Institut de Myologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France.

Address correspondence to: Xavier Nissan, 28 rue Henri Desbruères 91100 Corbeil Essonnes, France. Email: xnissan@istem.fr.

Find articles by Miagoux, Q. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Université Paris-Saclay, Université d’Evry, Inserm, IStem, UMR861, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

2IStem, CECS, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

3INTEGRARE, Genethon, Inserm, Université d’Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France.

4Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, UMRS974, Paris, France.

5Unité de Morphologie Neuromusculaire, Institut de Myologie, Sorbonne université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France.

6Centre de Référence des maladies Neuromusculaires Nord/Est/Ile-de-France, Institut de Myologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France.

Address correspondence to: Xavier Nissan, 28 rue Henri Desbruères 91100 Corbeil Essonnes, France. Email: xnissan@istem.fr.

Find articles by Benabides, M. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Université Paris-Saclay, Université d’Evry, Inserm, IStem, UMR861, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

2IStem, CECS, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

3INTEGRARE, Genethon, Inserm, Université d’Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France.

4Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, UMRS974, Paris, France.

5Unité de Morphologie Neuromusculaire, Institut de Myologie, Sorbonne université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France.

6Centre de Référence des maladies Neuromusculaires Nord/Est/Ile-de-France, Institut de Myologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France.

Address correspondence to: Xavier Nissan, 28 rue Henri Desbruères 91100 Corbeil Essonnes, France. Email: xnissan@istem.fr.

Find articles by Grossi, N. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Université Paris-Saclay, Université d’Evry, Inserm, IStem, UMR861, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

2IStem, CECS, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

3INTEGRARE, Genethon, Inserm, Université d’Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France.

4Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, UMRS974, Paris, France.

5Unité de Morphologie Neuromusculaire, Institut de Myologie, Sorbonne université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France.

6Centre de Référence des maladies Neuromusculaires Nord/Est/Ile-de-France, Institut de Myologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France.

Address correspondence to: Xavier Nissan, 28 rue Henri Desbruères 91100 Corbeil Essonnes, France. Email: xnissan@istem.fr.

Find articles by Hayat, H. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Université Paris-Saclay, Université d’Evry, Inserm, IStem, UMR861, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

2IStem, CECS, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

3INTEGRARE, Genethon, Inserm, Université d’Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France.

4Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, UMRS974, Paris, France.

5Unité de Morphologie Neuromusculaire, Institut de Myologie, Sorbonne université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France.

6Centre de Référence des maladies Neuromusculaires Nord/Est/Ile-de-France, Institut de Myologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France.

Address correspondence to: Xavier Nissan, 28 rue Henri Desbruères 91100 Corbeil Essonnes, France. Email: xnissan@istem.fr.

Find articles by Jarrige, M. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Université Paris-Saclay, Université d’Evry, Inserm, IStem, UMR861, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

2IStem, CECS, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

3INTEGRARE, Genethon, Inserm, Université d’Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France.

4Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, UMRS974, Paris, France.

5Unité de Morphologie Neuromusculaire, Institut de Myologie, Sorbonne université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France.

6Centre de Référence des maladies Neuromusculaires Nord/Est/Ile-de-France, Institut de Myologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France.

Address correspondence to: Xavier Nissan, 28 rue Henri Desbruères 91100 Corbeil Essonnes, France. Email: xnissan@istem.fr.

Find articles by Polveche, H. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Université Paris-Saclay, Université d’Evry, Inserm, IStem, UMR861, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

2IStem, CECS, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

3INTEGRARE, Genethon, Inserm, Université d’Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France.

4Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, UMRS974, Paris, France.

5Unité de Morphologie Neuromusculaire, Institut de Myologie, Sorbonne université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France.

6Centre de Référence des maladies Neuromusculaires Nord/Est/Ile-de-France, Institut de Myologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France.

Address correspondence to: Xavier Nissan, 28 rue Henri Desbruères 91100 Corbeil Essonnes, France. Email: xnissan@istem.fr.

Find articles by Agostini, V. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Université Paris-Saclay, Université d’Evry, Inserm, IStem, UMR861, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

2IStem, CECS, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

3INTEGRARE, Genethon, Inserm, Université d’Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France.

4Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, UMRS974, Paris, France.

5Unité de Morphologie Neuromusculaire, Institut de Myologie, Sorbonne université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France.

6Centre de Référence des maladies Neuromusculaires Nord/Est/Ile-de-France, Institut de Myologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France.

Address correspondence to: Xavier Nissan, 28 rue Henri Desbruères 91100 Corbeil Essonnes, France. Email: xnissan@istem.fr.

Find articles by Brureau, A. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Université Paris-Saclay, Université d’Evry, Inserm, IStem, UMR861, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

2IStem, CECS, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

3INTEGRARE, Genethon, Inserm, Université d’Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France.

4Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, UMRS974, Paris, France.

5Unité de Morphologie Neuromusculaire, Institut de Myologie, Sorbonne université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France.

6Centre de Référence des maladies Neuromusculaires Nord/Est/Ile-de-France, Institut de Myologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France.

Address correspondence to: Xavier Nissan, 28 rue Henri Desbruères 91100 Corbeil Essonnes, France. Email: xnissan@istem.fr.

Find articles by Vassilopoulos, S. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Université Paris-Saclay, Université d’Evry, Inserm, IStem, UMR861, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

2IStem, CECS, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

3INTEGRARE, Genethon, Inserm, Université d’Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France.

4Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, UMRS974, Paris, France.

5Unité de Morphologie Neuromusculaire, Institut de Myologie, Sorbonne université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France.

6Centre de Référence des maladies Neuromusculaires Nord/Est/Ile-de-France, Institut de Myologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France.

Address correspondence to: Xavier Nissan, 28 rue Henri Desbruères 91100 Corbeil Essonnes, France. Email: xnissan@istem.fr.

Find articles by Evangelista, T. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Université Paris-Saclay, Université d’Evry, Inserm, IStem, UMR861, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

2IStem, CECS, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

3INTEGRARE, Genethon, Inserm, Université d’Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France.

4Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, UMRS974, Paris, France.

5Unité de Morphologie Neuromusculaire, Institut de Myologie, Sorbonne université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France.

6Centre de Référence des maladies Neuromusculaires Nord/Est/Ile-de-France, Institut de Myologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France.

Address correspondence to: Xavier Nissan, 28 rue Henri Desbruères 91100 Corbeil Essonnes, France. Email: xnissan@istem.fr.

Find articles by Fernández-Eulate, G. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Université Paris-Saclay, Université d’Evry, Inserm, IStem, UMR861, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

2IStem, CECS, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

3INTEGRARE, Genethon, Inserm, Université d’Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France.

4Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, UMRS974, Paris, France.

5Unité de Morphologie Neuromusculaire, Institut de Myologie, Sorbonne université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France.

6Centre de Référence des maladies Neuromusculaires Nord/Est/Ile-de-France, Institut de Myologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France.

Address correspondence to: Xavier Nissan, 28 rue Henri Desbruères 91100 Corbeil Essonnes, France. Email: xnissan@istem.fr.

Find articles by Stojkovic, T. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Université Paris-Saclay, Université d’Evry, Inserm, IStem, UMR861, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

2IStem, CECS, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

3INTEGRARE, Genethon, Inserm, Université d’Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France.

4Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, UMRS974, Paris, France.

5Unité de Morphologie Neuromusculaire, Institut de Myologie, Sorbonne université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France.

6Centre de Référence des maladies Neuromusculaires Nord/Est/Ile-de-France, Institut de Myologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France.

Address correspondence to: Xavier Nissan, 28 rue Henri Desbruères 91100 Corbeil Essonnes, France. Email: xnissan@istem.fr.

Find articles by Richard, I. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Université Paris-Saclay, Université d’Evry, Inserm, IStem, UMR861, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

2IStem, CECS, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

3INTEGRARE, Genethon, Inserm, Université d’Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France.

4Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, UMRS974, Paris, France.

5Unité de Morphologie Neuromusculaire, Institut de Myologie, Sorbonne université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France.

6Centre de Référence des maladies Neuromusculaires Nord/Est/Ile-de-France, Institut de Myologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France.

Address correspondence to: Xavier Nissan, 28 rue Henri Desbruères 91100 Corbeil Essonnes, France. Email: xnissan@istem.fr.

Find articles by Nissan, X. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published March 23, 2026 - More info

Published in Volume 11, Issue 6 on March 23, 2026
JCI Insight. 2026;11(6):e200054. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.200054.
© 2026 Bruge et al. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Published March 23, 2026 - Version history
Received: September 9, 2025; Accepted: January 22, 2026
View PDF
Abstract

Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy R2 (LGMD R2) is an autosomal recessive disorder caused by dysferlin deficiency, leading to progressive muscle weakness and wasting. The lack of reliable clinical biomarkers has limited disease monitoring and therapeutic evaluation. Here, we identified Disabled-2 (DAB2) as a molecular and clinical indicator of disease state in LGMD R2. Transcriptomic profiling revealed a significant upregulation of DAB2 in induced pluripotent stem cell–derived (iPSC-derived) myotubes from patients, a finding validated in muscle biopsies from 14 dysferlin-deficient individuals and in dysferlin-deficient Bla/J mice, where DAB2 levels increased with disease progression. Importantly, AAV-mediated expression of full-length dysferlin restored DAB2 levels, supporting its value as a dynamic readout of disease activity for both disease monitoring and therapeutic response. Given the established role of DAB2 in clathrin-mediated endocytosis, particularly in LDL receptor internalization and cholesterol homeostasis, and the pathological lipid accumulation reported in LGMD R2, we investigated its contribution to lipid dysregulation. High DAB2 expression paralleled lipid deposition in patient muscles, iPSC-derived myotubes, and mouse tissue, whereas siRNA-mediated DAB2 knockdown reduced lipid accumulation in LGMD R2 myotubes. Collectively, these findings suggest that DAB2 functions as a mechanistic link between dysferlin deficiency, altered lipid handling, and disease severity, and they highlight its potential as a prognostic marker and therapeutic response measure for LGMD R2.

Graphical Abstract
graphical abstract
Introduction

The triggers of muscle degeneration in dysferlinopathies and the molecular pathways underlying disease progression remain poorly understood. Dysferlinopathies comprise a genetically heterogeneous group of muscular dystrophies. Among them, limb-girdle muscular dystrophy R2 (LGMD R2) is characterized by progressive weakness and wasting of the pelvic and scapular girdle muscles. With an estimated prevalence of 5.9–7.4 individuals per million worldwide (1), LGMD R2 is caused by autosomal recessive mutations in the DYSF gene (2, 3), which encodes dysferlin, a 230 kDa transmembrane protein highly expressed in striated muscle and enriched in the transverse tubules. Although several approaches have been described to partially restore muscle strength or motor function in preclinical models (4–16), no curative therapy is currently available, underscoring the need to better understand the molecular mechanisms underlying dysferlin deficiency.

Historically, studies aiming to elucidate the pathological mechanisms underlying dysferlinopathies have focused primarily on the role of dysferlin in plasma membrane repair (PMR) of the injured sarcolemma; a calcium-dependent process critical for maintaining myofiber integrity and function (17). While defects in PMR are observed in muscle fibers from dysferlin-deficient mice (18) and patient myocytes (19), studies also reported that its restoration alone (6) is insufficient to fully prevent or reverse dystrophic phenotypes (7), indicating that additional mechanisms contribute to disease progression. In agreement with these observations, several studies have highlighted a broader role of dysferlin through its involvement in t-tubule formation and maintenance (20–24), intracellular vesicular trafficking (25), and calcium homeostasis (20–22, 24, 26–28).

More recently, evidence from patient muscle biopsies and dysferlin-deficient mouse models suggested that progressive skeletal muscle remodeling is preceded by lipid accumulation within myofibers, followed by lipid deposition between myofibers (29–32), consistent with the possibility that altered lipid metabolism may contribute to early stages of LGMD R2 pathogenesis (33). This hypothesis is further supported by several studies (34–37) indicating that cholesterol homeostasis and lipid accumulation are not merely a secondary consequence of muscle degeneration but may represent an early, intrinsic, and therapeutically relevant aspect of the disease.

To dissect how early molecular defects drive progressive muscle damage, robust models that faithfully recapitulate human dysferlinopathy are essential. Over recent years, numerous studies, including studies from our group, have demonstrated the relevance of human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC) identifying molecular mechanisms and pathological phenotypes of muscular diseases (38–45). Building on this approach, we generated skeletal muscle cells (skMC) from 3 LGMD R2 patient-derived hiPSC to investigate cellular and molecular processes associated with this pathology. In our study, we observed that Disabled-2 (DAB2) was consistently upregulated in LGMD R2 hiPSC-derived myotubes using comparative transcriptomic analysis. Measures of DAB2 expression in patient biopsies and in an animal model confirmed its overexpression and suggested correlations with lipid accumulation, disease severity, and disease progression. We also found that dysferlin restoration normalized DAB2 levels, indicating that its expression may reflect both disease burden and therapeutic response. To explore the potential role of DAB2 in lipid accumulation, we performed loss-of-function experiments using siDAB2, which resulted in a reduction of lipid accumulation in LGMD R2 hiPSC-derived myotubes.

Collectively, these observations suggest that DAB2 may act as a clinically relevant tissue-associated marker and a potential regulator of lipid metabolism in LGMD R2, providing insights into disease mechanisms and identifying a candidate target for future gene-based or pharmacological interventions.

Results

Characterization of LGMD R2 hiPSC-derived skMC. We previously reported dysferlin expression in healthy hiPSC-derived skMC (44). To investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying LGMD R2, we differentiated 3 dysferlin-mutant hiPSC lines using the same standardized protocol (45). Two lines carry nonsense mutations (LGMD R2 KO_1 and KO_2), resulting in complete loss of dysferlin isoforms, whereas a third line harbors a missense mutation (LGMD R2 MIS) producing an aggregated, misfolded dysferlin protein, as previously reported (46). Pluripotency of all LGMD R2 hiPSC lines was confirmed by measuring SSEA4 and TRA-1-81 expression using flow cytometry (Supplemental Figure 1; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.200054DS1). Both LGMD R2 and control hiPSC were then differentiated using the established protocol (Figure 1A). qPCR showed no significant differences in OCT4 (Supplemental Figure 2A) or NANOG (Supplemental Figure 2B) pluripotency marker expression between control and LGMD R2 hiPSC lines (day 0). Throughout differentiation, the downregulation of pluripotency markers (Supplemental Figure 2, A and B) and induction of myogenic markers (MYOD, DESMIN, MYOG, TTN; Supplemental Figure 2, C–G) occurred with similar kinetics in both LGMD R2 and control cells, indicating that dysferlin deficiency does not impair early or late stages of myogenic differentiation. Additionally, immunostaining confirmed the ability of LGMD R2 hiPSC to form a well-organized network of striated myotubes positive for titin (Supplemental Figure 2H) and myosin heavy chain (Supplemental Figure 2I), similarly to unaffected control cells. Immunoblotting demonstrated complete absence of dysferlin in myoblasts and myotubes derived from the LGMD R2 nonsense lines and a marked reduction in the missense line compared with controls (Figure 1, B and C). These findings were confirmed by immunostaining, which showed absence of dysferlin in KO myoblasts (Figure 1D) and myotubes (Figure 1E) as well as perinuclear accumulation in MIS myotubes (Figure 1E).

Phenotypic features of LGMD R2 hiPSC-derived skeletal muscle cells reveal dFigure 1

Phenotypic features of LGMD R2 hiPSC-derived skeletal muscle cells reveal dysferlin deficiency. (A) Schematic representation of the skeletal myogenic differentiation protocol. Arrows indicate key stages where specific phenotypes are observed. Growth factors and cytokines used at each differentiation stage are specified, along with the progression of selected gene expression. Schematic created with BioRender. (B and C) Immunoblot analysis of dysferlin expression in LGMD R2 and control hiPSC-derived myoblasts (B) and myotubes (C). GAPDH is used as a loading control. (D and E) Immunostaining of dysferlin (green) in LGMD R2 and control myoblasts (D) and myotubes (E). Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst (blue). Insets show magnified views of dysferlin staining in myotubes. Scale bar: 20 μm. AA, ascorbic acid; C, CHIR99021; Dex, dexamethasone; E, epidermal growth factor; F, basic fibroblast growth factor; Fe, fetuin; H, hepatocyte growth factor; HS, horse serum; I, insulin; IG, insulin-like growth factor; N, necrosulfonamide; O, oncostatin; P, platelet-derived growth factor; SB, SB431542; hiPSC, human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Transcriptomic profiling reveals gene signatures and disrupted pathways in LGMD R2 myotubes. To investigate global transcriptional changes, we performed RNA-seq on LGMD R2 and control hiPSC-derived myotubes. Principal component analysis (PCA) and heatmap analysis revealed distinct clustering of LGMD R2 and control samples (Supplemental Figure 3A and Figure 2A). Differential expression analysis identified 52 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), including 13 downregulated and 39 upregulated genes in LGMD R2 myotubes (Figure 2B). qPCR analysis validated 20 of 23 selected DEGs, including DYSF itself (Supplemental Figure 3, B and C). Enrichment analysis using EnrichR indicated that downregulated genes were associated with fibrosis-related pathways (e.g., TGF-β signaling) and lipid metabolism (Supplemental Figure 3D), while upregulated genes were linked to extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling (Supplemental Figure 3E). Gene Ontology (GO) analysis further highlighted relevant biological processes, such as “regulation of intracellular transport” and “transmembrane receptor protein,” with a gene network centered on DAB2 (Figure 2, C and D).

Transcriptomic profiling reveals altered gene expression signatures in LGMDFigure 2

Transcriptomic profiling reveals altered gene expression signatures in LGMD R2 hiPSC-derived myotubes. (A) Hierarchical clustering of differentially expressed genes detected in LGMD R2 myotubes compared with controls. Gene expression is color-coded from blue (downregulated) to pink (upregulated). (B) Volcano plot representation of differential gene expression analysis between myotubes derived from 3 control and 3 LGMD R2 hiPSC lines. Downregulated (blue) and upregulated (pink) genes in LGMD R2 myotubes are highlighted. Vertical dashed lines indicate |log2FoldChange|threshold ≥ 0.4, and the horizontal dashed line represents a FDR ≤ 0.05. (C and D) Enriched gene ontology (GO) terms obtained by overrepresentation analysis (ORA) of upregulated genes in LGMD R2 myotubes compared with controls. Each pathway has an adjusted P value of 0.0995. (C) Dot plots show the 6 GO terms shared by at least 3 genes. (D) Cnetplot of the 5 biological processes most significantly shared among GO terms. Bubble size represents the number of enriched genes. DAB2 is highlighted in pink.

DAB2 as a marker of LGMD R2 pathophysiology. DAB2 overexpression in dysferlin-deficient myotubes was first confirmed at the transcript level by qPCR (Figure 3A) and validated at the protein level by Western blotting (Figure 3B). Confocal imaging further demonstrated increased cytoplasmic accumulation of DAB2, as evidenced by a higher number of DAB2+ puncta in LGMD R2 myotubes compared with control (Figure 3C and Supplemental Videos 1 and 2). To assess the relevance of these findings in human disease, we analyzed DAB2 expression in skeletal muscle biopsies from 14 genetically confirmed dysferlin-deficient patients and 2 unaffected controls (Supplemental Table 1). Dysferlin pathogenic variants were distributed across the protein without clustering at specific hot spots (Figure 3D). In most patient samples, DAB2 mRNA was significantly elevated in LGMD R2 patient biopsies compared with controls (Figure 3E). These observations were further supported by the analysis of a previously published RNA-seq dataset from 10 patients with LGMD R2 and 13 unaffected controls (47, 48), in which we noted an increased DAB2 expression in most patient muscle biopsies (Supplemental Figure 4). Importantly, our analysis confirmed that DAB2 expression did not correlate with patient sex (Supplemental Figure 5A), clinical subtype of dysferlinopathy (Supplemental Figure 5B), or serum creatine kinase (CK) levels (Supplemental Figure 5C). Instead, DAB2 levels appeared to reflect the severity of muscle pathology, as patients with higher Walton scale scores (Figure 3F) and more pronounced muscle morphological alterations (Supplemental Figure 5D) exhibited the highest DAB2 expression. Protein-level analysis confirmed these findings: DAB2 was markedly increased in the muscle biopsy from patient 2, who exhibited clear dystrophic features, while no modulation was observed in patient 6, whose muscle appeared morphologically normal and comparable with a healthy control (Figure 3G). Collectively, these data support the use of DAB2 as a marker of dysferlin deficiency and disease progression.

Dysregulation of Disabled-2 (DAB2) in human dysferlin-deficient myotubes anFigure 3

Dysregulation of Disabled-2 (DAB2) in human dysferlin-deficient myotubes and muscle biopsies. (A–C) Analysis of DAB2 in LGMD R2 hiPSC-derived myotubes. (A) qPCR analysis of DYSF and DAB2 expression in myotubes from 3 control (gray) and 3 LGMD R2 (pink) hiPSC lines. Data represent mean ± SD of 3 independent differentiations per line (n = 9), normalized to the mean of control myotubes. **P ≤ 0.001 (unpaired 2-tailed t test with Welch’s correction on log-transformed data); ###P ≤ 0.001 (unpaired 2-tailed t test). (B) Immunoblots of dysferlin (red) and DAB2 (green) in control and LGMD R2 myotubes. GAPDH served as loading control. (C) Immunostaining of DAB2 (red) and α-actinin (green) in control (top) and LGMD R2 (bottom) myotubes. Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst (blue). Insets show magnified regions. Scale bar: 10 μm. (D–G) DAB2 expression in muscle biopsies from 14 dysferlin-deficient patients. (D) Map of patient mutations in DYSF gene (exons separated by dotted lines). Protein domains are indicated. Each patient is numbered; clinical phenotype and sex are indicated by shape and color (Supplemental Table 1). (E) DAB2 mRNA levels from QuantSeq (Illumina) in control (gray) and patient (pink) muscle biopsies. Each dot represents a biopsy; bars indicate mean. *P ≤ 0.05 (Mann-Whitney U test). (F) Correlation between DAB2 expression and patient involvement (mildly affected 0 ≤ Walton scale ≤ 10 severely affected). Dots represent biopsies, color-coded from gray (low DAB2) to pink (high DAB2). Patients with the lowest (patient 6) and highest (patient 2) DAB2 expression are highlighted. *P ≤ 0.05 (Pearson correlation). (G) HPS-stained deltoid sections from patients 6 and 2 with immunostaining for dysferlin (red) and DAB2 (yellow). Scale bar: 500 μm. HPS, hematoxylin phloxine saffron; CdysfF, dysferlin domain C-terminal region; Fer, Ferlin domain; IdysfF, inner dysferlin domain; NdysfF, dysferlin domain N-terminal region; TM, transmembrane domain.

DAB2 expression inversely correlates with dysferlin content in vivo. We next assessed Dab2 expression in a dysferlin-deficient Bla/J mouse model (4). Homozygous Bla/J mice develop a progressive muscular dystrophy and recapitulate the main histopathological features observed in patients, including inflammation, fiber degeneration, and centrally nucleated fibers. Dystrophic changes are detectable at the age of 8 weeks and worsen by the age of 4 months, with widespread muscle impairment by 8 months. To investigate Dab2 dynamics at early disease stages, we analyzed psoas and gluteus muscles at 3 and 6 months of age. Tibialis anterior, which remains preserved in this model, was used as a control. At 3 months, histological analysis revealed that the psoas was the most affected muscle, with few centrally nucleated fibers and inflammatory areas (Figure 4A). By 6 months, both psoas and gluteus, but not tibialis anterior, showed significant morphological alterations (Figure 4A and Supplemental Figure 6). qPCR analysis of Dab2 confirmed the correlation with disease progression, as shown by the significant increase in Dab2 mRNA in the psoas at 3 months, with no changes in gluteus or tibialis anterior (Figure 4B), and its upregulation at 6 months in both psoas and gluteus but not in tibialis anterior (Figure 4C). These results were confirmed at the protein level by immunoblotting, which showed overexpression of Dab2 isoforms in psoas and gluteus muscles of 6-month-old Bla/J mice compared with controls (Figure 4D). To evaluate the potential use of Dab2 expression as a therapeutic response indicator, we next analyzed its expression in dysferlin-deficient presymptomatic mice treated with a dual AAV vector delivering full-length dysferlin (8) (Supplemental Figure 7A). Histological analysis showed that dysferlin rescue prevented dystrophic features in psoas and gluteus at both 1 and 6 months after injection, compared with saline-treated mice (Figure 4E and Supplemental Figure 7B). Correspondingly, qPCR revealed that dysferlin rescue (Figure 4F and Supplemental Figure 7C) was associated with a significant normalization of Dab2 mRNA levels (Figure 4G and Supplemental Figure 7D) in 1- and 6-month–treated mice. These results suggest that Dab2 may be used to monitor disease progression and therapeutic efficacy in vivo.

DAB2 is upregulated in severely affected muscles of dysferlin-deficient micFigure 4

DAB2 is upregulated in severely affected muscles of dysferlin-deficient mice and restored upon dysferlin gene therapy. (A–D) Analysis of Dab2 expression in dysferlin-deficient mice model (Bla/J). (A) Histological comparison of psoas and gluteus muscles from 3-month-old (left) and 6-month-old (right) control and Bla/J mice using HPS staining. Scale bar: 50 μm. Associated quantification of Dab2 mRNA by qPCR in psoas, gluteus, and tibialis anterior muscles of control (gray) and Bla/J (pink) mice at 3 (B) and 6 months (C). Expression levels are normalized to control mice. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3–5 per group). *P ≤ 0.05, ***P ≤ 0.001 (unpaired 2-tailed t test with Welch’s correction). (D) Immunoblots of murine Dab2 isoforms (green) in psoas (left) and gluteus (right) muscles from 6-month-old control and Bla/J mice. Actin is a loading control. (E–G) Dab2 expression following AAV-mediated dysferlin gene therapy in Bla/J mice. (E) Representative HPS-stained psoas sections from 1-month-old Bla/J mice after 1 month (left) or 6 months (right) of PBS or AAV dysferlin treatment. Scale bar: 200 μm. Associated measure of Dysf (F) and Dab2 (G) mRNA by qPCR in psoas muscles of PBS-treated (pink) or AAV-dysferlin-treated (gray) Bla/J mice. Expression levels are normalized to PBS-treated mice. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 5 per group). *P ≤ 0.05, ***P ≤ 0.001 (unpaired 2 tailed t test with Welch’s correction). Pso, psoas muscle; Glu, gluteus muscle; Ta, tibialis anterior muscle.

DAB2 expression is associated with lipid accumulation in dysferlin-deficient muscle and myotubes. Based on the reported defective lipid metabolism in LGMD R2 and the role of DAB2 in low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) endocytosis and cholesterol-rich LDL uptake (49, 50), we assessed the relation between dysferlin deficiency, lipid accumulation, and DAB2 expression. We first temporally and spatially characterized these parameters in Bla/J mice. Histological analysis confirmed that lipid deposition occurred predominantly in affected muscles, with strong Oil Red O staining in psoas and gluteus, but not tibialis anterior, at 6 months (Supplemental Figure 8). Dysferlin gene therapy markedly reduced lipid accumulation in the psoas (Figure 5A) and gluteus (Supplemental Figure 9) after 6 months of treatment compared with PBS-treated controls, consistent with previous findings. These observations were then assessed in patient muscles with low, high, and very high DAB2 expression. Lipid accumulation measured by Oil Red O staining indicated that patients with high or very high DAB2 content showed increased lipid deposition, whereas patients with low DAB2 levels and healthy controls displayed minimal lipid accumulation (Figure 5B). These findings were finally confirmed in vitro by analyzing lipid uptake in hiPSC-derived myotubes treated with fatty acids. Analysis of LGMD R2 and control cell lines revealed that LGMD R2 myotubes exhibited significantly greater lipid accumulation than controls, as shown by immunostaining (Figure 5C, Supplemental Figure 10, A–E, and Supplemental Videos 3 and 4) as well as by the quantification of lipid droplet volume (Figure 5D) and number (Supplemental Figure 10F) in myotubes. Finally, siRNA-mediated knockdown of DAB2 in hiPSC-derived myotubes (Supplemental Figure 10G) revealed reduced lipid deposition (Figure 5E and Supplemental Figure 10H and Supplemental Video 5). Quantitative analyses confirmed significant decreases in lipid droplet volume (Figure 5F and Supplemental Figure 10J) upon DAB2 silencing, consistent with the observed downregulation of DAB2 protein levels (Supplemental Figure 10, H and I). Together, these results support a functional link between DAB2 expression and pathological lipid accumulation in various dysferlin-deficient models.

DAB2 expression is associated with lipid accumulation in dysferlin-deficienFigure 5

DAB2 expression is associated with lipid accumulation in dysferlin-deficient muscle and myotubes. (A) Oil Red O–stained sections of psoas muscles from 1-month-old Bla/J mice treated for 6 months with PBS or AAV-dysferlin (AAV DYSF). Scale bar: 500 μM. (B) Deltoid biopsies from a healthy control and dysferlin-deficient patients with low (patient 4), high (patient 1), or very high (patient 12) DAB2 expression, stained for DAB2, HPS, and ORO. Scale bar: 50 μm. (C–F) Lipid accumulation in hiPSC-derived myotubes supplemented with fatty acids. (C) Immunostaining of lipid droplets (green) in myotubes (red) from 1 control and 3 LGMD R2 cell lines. Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst (blue). White boxes indicate magnified regions. Scale bar: 20 μm. (D) Associated quantification of lipid volume in control (gray) and LGMD R2 myotubes (pink). Data represent mean ± SD of 1 representative experiment from n=3 independent experiments. ***P ≤ 0.001 (1-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test after transformation). (E) Immunostaining of lipid droplets (green) in LGMD R2 KO_1 myotubes (red) transfected with siScramble (left) or siDAB2 (right). White boxes indicate magnified regions. Scale bar: 20 μm. (F) Associated quantification of lipid volume in LGMD R2 KO_1 myotubes after treatment with siScramble (pink) or siDAB2 (gray). Data represent mean ± SD of 1 representative experiment from n = 3 independent experiments. ***P ≤ 0.001 (unpaired 2-tailed t test with Welch’s correction). HPS, hematoxylin phloxine saffron; ORO, Oil Red O; siSCR, siScramble.

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the molecular mechanisms associated with dysferlin deficiency and identified the upregulation of DAB2 in cellular and animal models of the disease and in patient muscle biopsies. We also found a correlation between DAB2 expression and disease severity and evaluated its potential robustness as a measure of therapeutic efficacy.

While LGMD R2 is caused by a genetic mutation, predicting functional decline of the patients or therapeutic efficacy is a challenge because of the slow and often variable progression of the disease. In the past decades, increasing efforts have been made in identifying clinical noninvasive biomarkers for muscular dystrophies and in LGMD R2 specifically. So far, the most common biological marker in muscular dystrophies is the serum CK level, an energy metabolism enzyme that leaks from damaged muscles (51). In patients with dysferlinopathy, CK levels in the blood are usually elevated (52, 53), and this elevation persists throughout the course of the disease. However, CK levels present variations due to several external conditions (physical activity, muscle injury, toxic agents, age, etc.). Thus, although serum CK measurement is a useful diagnostic biomarker for muscular dystrophies, it is not appropriate for the assessment of disease progression. More recently, 3 proteins were reported to be significantly elevated in the serum of patients with LGMD R2 and to correlate with the time needed to walk 10 meters in patients (54). The identified proteins include skeletal troponin I (sTnI), myosin light chain 3 (MYL3), and fatty acid binding protein 3 (FABP3), which were also identified to be elevated in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). The creatine/creatinine metabolite ratio identified in DMD was also reported to be elevated in serum of patients with LGMD R2 (55). Further investigations are needed, however, to determine whether 1 or several (i.e., a group) of these circulating biomarkers is particularly useful for monitoring the clinical outcomes of patients with dysferlinopathy. Indeed, as recently demonstrated with two muscle growth factors, follistatin and myostatin, biomarkers whose levels are consistent with the patient’s motor function and muscle condition at initial assessment are not systematically correlated with disease progression (56). Here, we report promising results identifying DAB2 as a potential indicator of disease severity in dysferlinopathies. Our findings reveal that DAB2 overexpression in mice muscles was exacerbated in the most affected muscles and correlated with the disease progression. In the same way, our results show that DAB2 expression levels in patient biopsies correlated with the patient’s Walton scale, paving the way for the use of DAB2 as a molecular readout and prognostic tool. Our study also demonstrated that DAB2 transcript level is rescued following dysferlin reexpression in dysferlin-deficient mice. Beyond the use of DAB2 as a prognostic tool, these results suggest its use as a pharmacodynamic biomarker to assess the benefits of drug candidates or therapeutic approaches. Indeed, with recent progress in pharmacotherapy or gene therapy for muscular dystrophies, there is a growing need for minimally invasive biomarkers that can be used to assess and monitor the efficacy of new treatments in clinical trials. Current methods include functional evaluation scales to measure patient status, measurement of the level of fatty infiltration by MRI and quantification of serum proteins (57). While promising international studies are underway to identify the most relevant outcome measures with a view to conducting clinical trials in dysferlinopathies (53, 57), so far, there is only 1 protein that has been identified as a potential biomarker for monitoring the outcome of therapeutic interventions — i.e., the myofibrillar structural protein myomesin-3 (MYOM3) (58).

Our findings report a significant inverse correlation between elevated DAB2 expression and low dysferlin content. However, despite these observations, correlation does not inherently imply causation, and determining a functional role of DAB2 in LGMD R2 could open new opportunities for the development of future therapies. In the past decade, DAB2 has been described in the literature as a bona-fide clathrin adaptor molecule involved in clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) (59). CME generates small (60–120 nm) membrane vesicles that transport various cargo molecules from the plasma membrane to endosomes. Importantly, DAB2 has been shown to act as an adaptor molecule for internalization of only a subset of receptors endocytosed by CME (60) and notably involved in LDLR internalization and cholesterol-rich LDL uptake (49, 50). The uptake of LDL is highly responsive to even small changes of cholesterol concentrations, and deprivation of cholesterol induces SREBP transcription factor activation, which in turn regulates LDLR expression (61). Interestingly, in the past years, several studies have reported the significant accumulation of a broad range of lipids in presymptomatic dysferlin–deficient mice (31) and a deleterious effect of non-HDL–associated cholesterol in dysferlin-deficient muscles (36, 62). Additionally, recent comprehensive lipidomic analyses revealed widespread alterations in both storage and membrane-associated lipids, including neutral lipids, phospholipids, and sphingolipids, coupled with reduced fatty acid oxidation and a shift toward preferential lipid storage in LGMD R2 (30, 31, 34), highlighting a major role of lipid metabolism in LGMD R2 pathophysiology. While the cause of these dysregulations is still unknown, our discovery that the major clathrin adaptor responsible for cholesterol uptake is increased in LGMD R2 muscle raises the possibility that modulation of cholesterol levels could prove to be a possible therapeutic intervention. Although further investigations are needed to explore the functional consequences of DAB2 modulation on cholesterol homeostasis or lipid accumulation in LGMD R2, our study proposes DAB2 as a promising target for the development of novel therapeutic strategies.

In conclusion, our findings suggest that DAB2 could serve as a marker of disease progression. Overall, these results demonstrate that DAB2 is inversely correlated to dysferlin levels, indicating its potential involvement in the pathophysiology of LGMD R2. From this observation and the known functions of DAB2, we hypothesize that the increased expression of DAB2 may play a crucial role in impaired cholesterol homeostasis in patients with LGMD R2 by enhancing cholesterol uptake via the LDLR endocytosis. If confirmed, these findings could represent an important step toward improved understanding of LGMD R2 and open the door to a novel therapeutic approach targeting DAB2 that may positively influence disease progression and reduce the associated burden. Beyond LGMD R2, our data indicate that DAB2 upregulation also occurs in other muscular dystrophies such as DMD. In DMD, DAB2 levels were elevated in hiPSC-derived myotubes, in dystrophic muscles from mdx mice, and in patient muscle biopsies (Supplemental Figure 11). This broader pattern reinforces previous observations indicating that DMD shares convergent pathological features with LGMD R2, notably altered membrane trafficking, and disrupted lipid homeostasis. As previously reported, DMD muscles exhibit profound disturbances in lipid metabolism (63–67) that appear to correlate with disease severity (68), and recent work demonstrates early endosomal and endolysosomal defects in DMD myoblasts and in mdx muscles (69, 70), 2 processes in which DAB2 plays a functional role. Identifying such common mechanisms across muscular dystrophies is essential, as it may uncover shared therapeutic strategies rather than disease-specific approaches, raising the possibility that DAB2-related pathways represent a unifying node in dystrophic muscle pathology. These observations underscore the need for comparative mechanistic studies across disease subtypes.

Methods

Sex as a biological variable. Our study examined male mice because male animals exhibited less variability in phenotype. Sex was not considered as a biological variable for patient muscle biopsies.

Cell lines and culture. Experiments were performed using hiPSC lines from 3 unaffected individuals (controls, referenced as WT1, WT2, WT3), and 3 patients with LGMD R2 (referenced as KO_1, KO_2, MIS). WT1 and WT2 hiPSC lines were reprogrammed from healthy IMR-90 lung fibroblasts obtained from the ATCC Cell Lines Biology Collection and from GM1869 provided by the Coriell Cell Repository (71, 72). The WT3 hiPSC line is a commercial cell line supplied by Phenocell. The hiPSC LGMD R2 KO_1 (heterozygous nonsense c.5713C>T, p.Arg1905X; c.3517dupT, p.Ser1173PhefsX2) and KO_2 (heterozygous nonsense c.5946 +1G>A; c.5497G>T; p.Glu1833X) are among the dysferlin-deficient lines deposited by the Jain Foundation with the WiCell Research Institute, officially designated as Jain Foundation line JFNY1 (CDI#01456.103.11) and JFRBi1 (CDI#01457.101.08), respectively. The hiPSC LGMD R2 MIS line (homozygous missense c.4022T>C, p.L1341P) was provided by Simone Spuler (Max Delbruck Center, Berlin). Three additional hiPSC lines from patients with DMD (generated by the DREAMS project ID: 101080229) were used in supplementary experiments. Control and patient-derived hiPSC lines were maintained and expanded as single cells on feeder-free, vitronectin-coated dishes (Gibco) in StemMACS iPS-Brew XF medium (Miltenyi Biotech). hiPSC were differentiated into skMC using commercial media (Geneabiocell) as described previously (45). Briefly, hiPSC were dissociated with StemPro Accutase (Gibco), seeded on collagen I–coated plates (DB Biosciences), and maintained for 10 days in skeletal muscle induction medium (SKM01, AMSBIO) with a passage at day 7. Myogenic precursors were then dissociated with 0.05% trypsin (ThermoFisher Scientific) and reseeded on collagen I–coated plates for 7 days in skeletal myoblast medium (SKM02, AMSBIO) until freezing. For terminal differentiation, myoblasts were thawed on collagen I–coated glass slides in skeletal myoblast medium and, at confluence, incubated with skeletal muscle differentiation medium (SKM03, AMSBIO) for an additional 5–7 days. hiPSC, myoblasts, and myotubes were analyzed at days 0, 17, and 24 of differentiation, respectively. Maturation levels of myoblasts and myotubes were compared with a primary control muscle cell line (C25CL48 myoblasts) established from a human muscle biopsy and provided by the MyoLine immortalization platform of the Institute de Myology (Paris, France), with informed consent and anonymization prior to immortalization, in accordance with EU GDPR. To evaluate lipid metabolism, hiPSC-derived myotubes at day 3 were cultured in fatty-acid–supplemented SKM03 for 48 hours following a standardized protocol. Linoleic acid (LA, C18:2) and oleic acid (OA, C18:1) were dissolved in ethanol to obtain 100 mM stock solutions and then diluted in serum-free culture medium, yielding final fatty acid concentrations of 50 μM. Control cells received medium containing an equivalent volume of ethanol.

Patient muscle samples. Skeletal muscle biopsies from 2 healthy control and 14 dysferlin-deficient patients were obtained from the Unité de Morphologie Neuromusculaire (Institut de Myologie). Muscle biopsies from patients followed at Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital were selected based on: (a) confirmed biallelic DYSF pathogenic variants, (b) absent or nearly absent dysferlin by immune histochemistry and/or Western blot, and (c) clinical evidence of neuromuscular disease across a broad range of ages, age at onset, and clinical severity. Open biopsies were obtained from the deltoid muscle, snap-frozen in isopentane cooled in liquid nitrogen, and used for histoenzymology and IHC. An additional muscle biopsy from a patient with DMD was obtained from the Unité de Morphologie Neuromusculaire (Institut de Myologie).

Animal models. B6.A-Dysfprmd/GeneJ (strain 012767; referred to as Bla/J) and C57BL/6J (WT/control) male mice, obtained from the laboratory of Isabelle Richard (Généthon, Évry), were housed in an SPF barrier facility with a 12-hour light/ dark cycle at the Center for Exploration and Experimental Functional Research (CERFE, GIP GENOPOLE) and were provided with food and water ad libitum. All animals were handled according to French and European guidelines for human care and use of experimental animals (APAFIS no. 35896). For in vivo studies aimed at restoring full-length dysferlin expression by gene therapy, 1-month-old Bla/J mice received an equimolar mixture of AAV8_C5.12_HR5-hDysf and AAV8_HR3-DysfpA.SV40 vectors in saline at 1 × 1014 vg/kg (viral genomes per kilogram) or saline alone (controls) via a single i.v. injection into the tail vein. Mice were euthanized 1 or 6 months after injection by cervical elongation. Tibialis anterior, psoas, and gluteus muscles were collected. Left muscles were mounted transversely on a cork stopper by 6% tracaganth gum (Sigma), frozen in isopentane cooled in liquid nitrogen for histology, sectioned at 8 μm on a cryostat (Leica), placed on slides, and stored at –80°C. Right muscles were frozen directly in liquid nitrogen in 1.5 mL tubes for RNA and protein extraction. All samples were stored at –80°C. Frozen PSO muscles from 2-month-old mdx mice were provided by collaborating investigators.

Flow cytometry. Single-cell suspensions of hiPSC were prepared after chemical dissociation with accutase (Invitrogen), centrifuged at 100g for 5 minutes, and resuspended in 2% FBS (Sigma) in cold PBS. Cells were stained with fluorescent dye-conjugated antibodies (Supplemental Table 2) for 30 minutes on ice in the dark. Cells were washed in cold PBS and analyzed on a MACSquant analyzer (Miltenyi Biotec). Data were analyzed with FlowJo Software (BD Biosciences).

Transient transfection. hiPSC-derived myotubes were transfected at day 3 by using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with siRNAs targeting DAB2 (ON-TARGETplus Human DAB2, Dharmacon) or a nonspecific scrambled control (Invitrogen). Forty-eight hours after transfection, myotubes were frozen for Western blotting or fixed for immunostaining.

qPCR. RNA was extracted according to 2 different methods depending on sample type. Total RNA from in vitro cells was isolated using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen) with on-column DNase I digestion. Total RNA from mouse muscle biopsies was extracted using the NucleoZOL (Macherey-Nagel) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, nitrogen-frozen muscle tissue was divided, 1 piece was lysed in NucleoZOL and homogenized using a FastPrep-24 instrument (MP Biomedicals). The lysate was supplemented with water, incubated for 10 minutes at room temperature, and centrifuged for 15 minutes at 12,000g. The upper phase was collected, incubated with isopropanol for 10 minutes at room temperature, and centrifuged 10 minutes at 12,000g to precipitate RNA. The pellet was washed with 75% ethanol, centrifuged 3 minutes at 8,000g, air-dried for 15 minutes, and resuspended in RNase-free water.

RNA quantity and purity were assessed using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer. A total of 500 ng RNA was reverse transcribed using SuperScript III (Invitrogen). qPCR was performed on a QuantStudio 12K Flex (Applied Biosystems) using Luminaris Color HiGreen qPCR Master Mix (Thermo Scientific) or TaqMan gene expression Master Mix (Roche), following manufacturers’ instructions. Gene expression was quantified by the ΔCt method and normalized to human 18S or murine PO expression. Primer sequences designed for this study are listed in Supplemental Table 3. Sequences of other genes are commercially available (Applied biosystem): DYSF (Hs01002513), TTN (Hs00399225), and 18S (assay HS_099999).

Immunostaining assay. skMC were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Euromedex) for 10 minutes at room temperature. After 3 washes in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), cells were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 (Sigma) for 10 minutes and blocked in PBS supplemented with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma) for 1 hour at room temperature. Cells were stained for specific markers overnight at 4°C using primary antibodies (Supplemental Table 2). After 3 washes in PBS, labeling was revealed with appropriate fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies (Supplemental Table 2) for 1 hour at room temperature in the dark, and nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst (Invitrogen). Imaging was performed on a CellInsight CX7 imager (Cellomics Inc) with 20× or 40× objectives. For high-resolution acquisitions, coverslips were mounted in Fluoromount (Thermo Scientific) and imaged on an LSM 880 confocal microscope (Zeiss) with a 63× oil-immersion objective and z stack acquisition. Z stacks were combined using Zen Black (Zeiss) software to generate a single resolved image or for 3D myotube modeling.

Lipid droplet analysis. After 48 hours of fatty acid supplementation, myotubes were immunostained with antidesmin antibody, as described. During secondary antibody incubation, lipid droplets were labeled with LipidSpot 488 (Biotium) for 1 hour at room temperature. Images were acquired on an LSM 880 confocal microscope (Zeiss) with a 63× oil immersion objective and z stack module. Z stacks were automatically reconstructed in 3D using the 3D viewer module of Imaris analysis software (v.10.2, Oxford instruments). Nuclei (Hoechst) were segmented using the Add New Surfaces function, adjusting thresholding parameters to optimize signal detection. Myotubes (desmin staining) were segmented similarly, with threshold adjustment and removal artifacts to generate a region of interest (ROI). Lipid droplets (LipidSpot) were analyzed using 2 complementary approaches. First, droplets were detected as individual puncta with the Spots module using optimized detection parameters (estimated spot diameter, background subtraction, threshold, quality filter). Second, droplets were segmented as continuous structures with the Add New Surfaces module using intensity thresholding. Lipid droplets were quantified within the ROI “myotubes” by using the shortest distance to surface filter. Detection parameters were applied uniformly across the image batch. Quantitative metrics (nuclei count, total myotube volume, number of lipid droplet spots and lipid volume within myotubes using the “Shortest Distance to Surface” filter) were extracted from the Statistics tab and exported for analysis.

Histological characterization and IHC. For hematoxylin-phloxine-saffron (HPS) staining, slides were thawed, air-dried for 10 minutes, and incubated for 5 minutes in Harris hematoxylin bath (Sigma). Sections were washed in distilled water for 2 minutes, dipped in 0.2% (v/v) hydrochloric alcohol for 10 seconds, and rinsed in water for 1 minute. Slides were immersed in Scott’s water (0.5 g/L sodium bicarbonate and 20 g/L magnesium sulfate) for 1 minute, rinsed in water for 1 minute, stained in 1% (m/v) phloxine (Sigma) for 30 seconds. Sections were rinsed in water for 1 minute 30 seconds, dehydrated in 70% ethanol for 1 minute, and then absolute ethanol for 30 seconds. Finally, staining was completed in 1% saffron (v/v in absolute ethanol) for 3 minutes, followed by a wash in absolute ethanol. Sections were cleared in xylene for 2 minutes and mounted in Eukitt medium (Labonord). Slides were dried ≥ 24 hours and scanned using an AxioScan (Zeiss).

For IHC detection of dysferlin and DAB2, 10 μm transverse sections of human muscle biopsies were rehydrated with PBS for 10 minutes at room temperature, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Euromedex) for 10 minutes, and immunostained as described. Coverslips were mounted in Fluoromount (Thermo Scientific), and images were acquired using an LSM 880 confocal microscope (Zeiss) with a 20× objective.

Oil Red O staining on frozen muscle sections. Frozen human and mice muscle biopsy sections were air-dried for 15 minutes at room temperature and subsequently fixed in 60% isopropanol for 1 minute. Sections were then incubated in freshly prepared ORO working solution for 10 minutes, followed by a 30-second rinse in 60% isopropanol and a gentle wash in distilled water. Counterstaining was performed with hematoxylin for 30 seconds, after which sections were rinsed again in distilled water. Slides were mounted with Fluoromount-G, applied carefully to avoid displacement of the section or introduction of air bubbles, and coverslipped without applying pressure. Slides were dried under a chemical hood before imaging using an Evos cell imaging system (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Western blot analysis. Proteins were extracted using 2 methods depending on sample origin. For whole-cell lysates of skeletal muscle, proteins were extracted with NP40 lysis buffer (Thermo Scientific) supplemented with protease inhibitors (Complete PIC, Roche). Protein concentration was determined using Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific) and absorbance measured at 562 nm on a CLARIOstar microplate reader (BMG Labtech). A total of 20 μg of protein was separated using 4%–15% Criterion XT Tris-Glycine gels (Bio-Rad) and then transferred to PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad) using a Trans-Blot Turbo system (Bio-Rad). For mouse muscle biopsies, 30 μm sections were lysed in RIPA buffer (ThermoFisher) supplemented with protease inhibitors (Complete PIC EDTA-free; Roche) and Benzonase (Merck-Millipore), then homogenized with a FisherBrand instrument (ThermoFisher). Protein concentration was determined by BCA assay (Thermo Scientific) and measured on an EnSpire multimode plate reader (PerkinElmer). A total of 15 μg of protein was separated on 4%–12% NuPAGE Novex Tris-Bis gels (ThermoFisher) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (ThermoFisher) using an iBlot device (ThermoFisher).

Membranes were blocked in Odyssey blocking buffer (LI-COR) for 1 hour at room temperature, incubated with primary antibodies (Supplemental Table 2) diluted in blocking buffer overnight at 4°C or for 2 hours at room temperature. Washing was carried out 3 times for 10 minutes in TBS + 0.1% Tween-20 (VWR) and membranes were incubated with appropriate fluorescent secondary antibodies (Supplemental Table 2) for 1 hour at room temperature. After washing, proteins were detected by fluorescence (Odyssey CLx, LI-COR).

Transcriptomic analysis. Differential gene expression between hiPSC-derived myotubes was assessed using QuantSeq 3′ mRNA-seq on an Ion Torrent platform. For each of 18 samples, 100 ng total RNA was used to prepare libraries with the QuantSeq 3′ mRNA-Seq Library Prep Kit for Ion Torrent, generating NGS libraries from the 3′ end of polyadenylated RNA. Libraries were amplified and barcoded (13 cycles) and quantified with the Agilent High Sensitivity DNA kit. Ten libraries (100 pM each) were pooled; emulsion PCR and enrichment were performed on the Ion OT2 instrument using the Ion PI Hi-Q OT2 200 kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Samples were loaded on an Ion PI v3 Chip and sequenced on an Ion Proton System using Ion PI Hi-Q 200 bp chemistry (Thermo Fisher). Quality control was performed with FastQC (v0.11.2). Reads were trimmed with Prinseq (v0.20.4; --trim-right 20) and filtered by Phred score (--trim-qual 20) (73). Reads were aligned to the Ensembl GRCh37.87 reference (protein-coding genes only: 19,311 genes; 143,832 transcripts) using RNA-STAR (v2.4.1d) (74) and filtered with samtools (v0.1.19) (75). Gene-level counts were obtained with HTSeq-count (v0.8.0) (76). Transcript expression was quantified with Kallisto (v0.43.1) (77). Finally, differential gene and transcript expression (DEG) between conditions was analyzed with DESeq2 (v1.18.1 using R v3.4.1) (78). Genes were considered significantly differentially expressed at adjusted P < 0.05 and |log2 fold change| > 0.4 (lfcThreshold = 0.4; altHypothesis = “greaterAbs”). Quantseq data generated in this study have been deposited on NCBI GEO under the accession number no.GSE261832.

Biological interpretation of DEGs was conducted with EnrichR (79) using the KEGG2021 database. Gene enrichment of up- and downregulated DEGs was also performed using the overrepresentation approach in the clusterProfiler package (80), focusing on GO Biological Process terms. GO terms with adjusted P < 0.1 were considered significant.

Cross-referencing transcriptomic data. One previously published dataset (47, 48) was analyzed. This set contains Affymetrix mRNA profiles from 117 patient muscle biopsies using HG-U133A and HG-U1333B microarrays (n = 234 microarrays total; GEO accession no. GSE3307). While the original study analyzed 13 groups, here we analyzed only healthy and LGMD R2 skeletal muscle samples (Healthy: n = 13, LGMD R2: n = 10). Differential expression analysis (LGMD R2 versus WT) was performed using GEO2R (LIMMA) on the GEO platform.

Statistics. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test or an unpaired, 2 tailed t test with Welch’s correction. For comparisons involving more than 2 groups, 1-way ANOVA was used followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. Data were log-transformed when necessary. Differences were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05. Correlations between data were assessed using Pearson correlation with significance set at *P ≤ 0.05. All graphs were generated in GraphPad Prism (v9.2.0).

Study approval. All human cell lines were obtained from commercial collections as described or from collaborators with the subjects’ agreement, as evidenced by their signature of an informed consent form, and anonymized in accordance with the EU GDPR regulation. Human skeletal muscle biopsies were obtained from the Unité de Morphologie Neuromusculaire (Institut de Myologie). Biopsies were performed as part of the diagnostic process, and patients provided informed consent for genetic analysis and the reuse of biological samples for research purposes. All animals were handled in accordance with French and European guidelines for the care and use of experimental animals (APAFIS no. 35896).

Data availability. All data generated or analyzed are included in this article or its supplemental material, including the Supporting Data Values file. The transcriptomic dataset generated and analyzed during this study is available in the NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus repository (accession no. GSE261832).

Author contributions

CB and XN were responsible for the experimental conception and design. XN and IR were responsible for project management. CB performed the cell culture experiments, generated the cell banks, developed the pathological skeletal muscle model, and realized the functional analyses. MJ technically carried out the transcriptomic analysis. MJ, HP, CB, QM, and AB performed analysis and interpretation. EP, MB, NG, and HH provided technical assistance for cell culture. IR provided the Bla/J mouse model. NB and VA conceived and performed animal experiments. CB and NB investigated mouse biopsies and carried out molecular analyses. SV has contributed his expertise on CME linked to DAB2. TE, GFE, and TS provided human muscular biopsies. CB conceived and performed the human biopsy analyses. CB prepared the figures. CB and XN wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed and edited the paper.

Funding support
  • L’Association Française contre les Myopathies (AFM Téléthon).
  • Laboratoire d’Excellence Revive (Investissement d’Avenir; ANR 10 LABX 73).
  • The Region Ile de France via the doctoral school « Innovation Thérapeutique, du fondamental à l’appliqué » (ED 569) from Paris Saclay University.
  • The Genopole Biocluster.
  • BPI France.
  • The Foundation For Rare Diseases.
  • University of Évry Paris-Saclay.
  • Horizon Europe: 101080229-2.
Supplemental material

View Supplemental data

View Unedited blot and gel images

View Supplemental video 1

View Supplemental video 2

View Supplemental video 3

View Supplemental video 4

View Supplemental video 5

View Supporting data values

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Marc Bartoli (Marseille Medical Genetics, Marseille) for helpful discussions, Jerome Polentes, Celine Leteur, Olivier Chose, Lina El Kassar, and Karine Giraud-Triboult from the research and innovation teams of I-Stem for providing expertise and technical support in imaging, quality controls and bioproduction, and the Platform for Immortalization of Human Cells from the Centre of Research in Myology (Institute of Myology, Paris, France) for providing immortalized myoblasts. We thank Simone Spuler for providing some of the cellular models used in this study. We thank the Jain Foundation and Cellular Dynamics for generation, characterization, and provision of JFNY1 and JFRBi1 hiPSC. We also thank France Leturcq for providing help for mRNA extraction in patient muscle biopsies. We are grateful to the “in vivo department” of Genethon for technical support in animal experiments and to the AAV production department for viral productions. Figures 1A, Supplemental Figure 7A, and the graphical abstract figures were created with the BioRender website. University of Évry Paris-Saclay provided support to acquire the necessary equipments of the research and innovation platform for conducting the experiments outlined in this manuscript. The research team involved in this study is supported in part by the DREAMS project, funded by the European Union (EU) under 101080229-2. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the EU or European Research Executive Agency (REA). Neither the EU nor REA can be held responsible for them.

Address correspondence to: Xavier Nissan, 28 rue Henri Desbruères 91100 Corbeil Essonnes, France. Email: xnissan@istem.fr.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Copyright: © 2026, Bruge et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reference information: JCI Insight. 2026;11(6):e200054.https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.200054.

References
  1. Liu W, et al. Estimating prevalence for limb-girdle muscular dystrophy based on public sequencing databases. Genet Med. 2019;21(11):2512–2520.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Bashir R, et al. A gene related to Caenorhabditis elegans spermatogenesis factor fer-1 is mutated in limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2B. Nat Genet. 1998;20(1):37–42.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Liu J, et al. Dysferlin, a novel skeletal muscle gene, is mutated in Miyoshi myopathy and limb girdle muscular dystrophy. Nat Genet. 1998;20(1):31–36.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Lostal W, et al. Efficient recovery of dysferlin deficiency by dual adeno-associated vector-mediated gene transfer. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19(10):1897–1907.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Sondergaard PC, et al. AAV.Dysferlin overlap vectors restore function in dysferlinopathy animal models. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2015;2(3):256–270.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Krahn M, et al. A naturally occurring human minidysferlin protein repairs sarcolemmal lesions in a mouse model of dysferlinopathy. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2(50):50ra69.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Lostal W, et al. Lack of correlation between outcomes of membrane repair assay and correction of dystrophic changes in experimental therapeutic strategy in dysferlinopathy. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e38036.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Pryadkina M, et al. A comparison of AAV strategies distinguishes overlapping vectors for efficient systemic delivery of the 6.2 kb Dysferlin coding sequence. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2015;2:15009.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Potter RA, et al. Systemic delivery of dysferlin overlap vectors provides long-term gene expression and functional improvement for dysferlinopathy. Hum Gene Ther. 2018;29(7):749–762.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Verwey N, et al. Antisense-mediated skipping of dysferlin exons in control and dysferlinopathy patient-derived cells. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2020;30(2):71–79.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Lee JJA, et al. Identification of novel antisense-mediated exon skipping targets in DYSF for therapeutic treatment of dysferlinopathy. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2018;13:596–604.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Barthélémy F, et al. Dysferlin exon 32 skipping in patient cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1828:489–496.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Vallecillo-Zúniga ML, et al. Treatment with galectin-1 improves myogenic potential and membrane repair in dysferlin-deficient models. PLoS One. 2020;15(9):e0238441.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Vallecillo-Zúniga ML, et al. Therapeutic benefit of galectin-1: beyond membrane repair, a multifaceted approach to LGMD2B. Cells. 2021;10(11):3210.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  15. García-Campos P, et al. N-acetylcysteine reduces skeletal muscles oxidative stress and improves grip strength in dysferlin-deficient Bla/J mice. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(12):4293.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Cea LA, et al. Blockade of hemichannels normalizes the differentiation fate of myoblasts and features of skeletal muscles from dysferlin-deficient mice. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(17):6025.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Blazek AD, et al. Plasma membrane repair: a central process for maintaining cellular homeostasis. Physiology (Bethesda). 2015;30(6):438–448.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  18. Bansal D, et al. Defective membrane repair in dysferlin-deficient muscular dystrophy. Nature. 2003;423(6936):168–172.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Philippi S, et al. Dysferlin-deficient immortalized human myoblasts and myotubes as a useful tool to study dysferlinopathy. PLoS Curr. 2012;4:RRN1298.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Klinge L, et al. Dysferlin associates with the developing T-tubule system in rodent and human skeletal muscle. Muscle Nerve. 2010;41(2):166–173.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Demonbreun AR, et al. Dysferlin and myoferlin regulate transverse tubule formation and glycerol sensitivity. Am J Pathol. 2014;184(1):248–259.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Kerr JP, et al. Dysferlin stabilizes stress-induced Ca2+ signaling in the transverse tubule membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(51):20831–20836.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Hofhuis J, et al. Dysferlin mediates membrane tubulation and links T-tubule biogenesis to muscular dystrophy. J Cell Sci. 2017;130(5):841–852.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Lukyanenko V, et al. Coupling of excitation to Ca2+ release is modulated by dysferlin. J Physiol. 2017;595(15):5191–5207.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Demonbreun AR, et al. Impaired muscle growth and response to insulin-like growth factor 1 in dysferlin-mediated muscular dystrophy. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20(4):779–789.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Kerr JP, et al. Dysferlin at transverse tubules regulates Ca(2+) homeostasis in skeletal muscle. Front Physiol. 2014;5:89.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  27. Cea LA, et al. The absence of dysferlin induces the expression of functional connexin-based hemichannels in human myotubes. BMC Cell Biol. 2016;17 Suppl 1(suppl 1):15.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Khodabukus A, et al. Bioengineered model of human LGMD2B skeletal muscle reveals roles of intracellular calcium overload in contractile and metabolic dysfunction in dysferlinopathy. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024;11(31):e2400188.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  29. Diaz-Manera J, et al. Muscle MRI in patients with dysferlinopathy: pattern recognition and implications for clinical trials. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018;89(10):1071–1081.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Agarwal AK, et al. Insights into lipid accumulation in skeletal muscle in dysferlin-deficient mice. J Lipid Res. 2019;60(12):2057–2073.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  31. Haynes VR, et al. Dysferlin deficiency alters lipid metabolism and remodels the skeletal muscle lipidome in mice. J Lipid Res. 2019;60(8):1350–1364.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  32. Grounds MD, et al. Lipid accumulation in dysferlin-deficient muscles. Am J Pathol. 2014;184(6):1668–1676.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  33. Srivastava NK, et al. Perturbation of muscle metabolism in patients with muscular dystrophy in early or acute phase of disease: in vitro, high resolution NMR spectroscopy based analysis. Clin Chim Acta. 2018;478:171–181.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  34. White Z, et al. Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2B causes HDL-C abnormalities in patients and statin-resistant muscle wasting in dysferlin-deficient mice. Skelet Muscle. 2022;12(1):25.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  35. White Z, et al. Effect of dysferlin deficiency on atherosclerosis and plasma lipoprotein composition under normal and hyperlipidemic conditions. Front Physiol. 2021;12:675322.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Sun Z, et al. Apolipoprotein E knockout, but not cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP)-associated high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) lowering, exacerbates muscle wasting in dysferlin-null mice. Lipids Health Dis. 2024;23(1):247.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  37. White Z, et al. High-density lipoprotein-associated cholesterol abnormalities in a clinical outcomes study of dysferlin-deficient limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type R2. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2025;16(4):e70042.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Tedesco FS, et al. Transplantation of genetically corrected human iPSC-derived progenitors in mice with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(140):140ra89.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Tanaka A, et al. Efficient and reproducible myogenic differentiation from human iPS cells: prospects for modeling Miyoshi Myopathy in vitro. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e61540.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  40. Shoji E, et al. Early pathogenesis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy modelled in patient-derived human induced pluripotent stem cells. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):12831.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Wu J, et al. Generation of an induced pluripotent stem cell line (CSCRMi001-A) from a patient with a new type of limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD) due to a missense mutation in POGLUT1 (Rumi). Stem Cell Res. 2017;24:102–105.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  42. El-Battrawy I, et al. Ion channel dysfunctions in dilated cardiomyopathy in limb-girdle muscular dystrophy. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2018;11(3):e001893.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  43. Mateos-Aierdi AJ, et al. Patient-specific iPSC-derived cellular models of LGMDR1. Stem Cell Res. 2021;53:102333.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  44. Bruge C, et al. Skeletal muscle cells derived from induced pluripotent stem cells: a platform for limb girdle muscular dystrophies. Biomedicines. 2022;10(6):1428.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  45. Caron L, et al. A human pluripotent stem cell model of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy-affected skeletal muscles. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2016;5(9):1145–1161.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  46. Wenzel K, et al. Novel sequence variants in dysferlin-deficient muscular dystrophy leading to mRNA decay and possible C2-domain misfolding. Hum Mutat. 2006;27(6):599–600.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  47. Bakay M, et al. Nuclear envelope dystrophies show a transcriptional fingerprint suggesting disruption of Rb-MyoD pathways in muscle regeneration. Brain. 2006;129(pt 4):996–1013.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  48. Dadgar S, et al. Asynchronous remodeling is a driver of failed regeneration in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Cell Biol. 2014;207(1):139–158.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  49. Mettlen M, et al. Cargo- and adaptor-specific mechanisms regulate clathrin-mediated endocytosis. J Cell Biol. 2010;188(6):919–933.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  50. Tao W, et al. Endocytosis and physiology: insights from disabled-2 deficient mice. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2016;4:149.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  51. Ozawa E, et al. Creatine kinase, cell membrane and Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Mol Cell Biochem. 1999;190(1-2):143–151.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  52. Fanin M, Angelini C. Progress and challenges in diagnosis of dysferlinopathy. Muscle Nerve. 2016;54(5):821–835.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  53. Harris E, et al. The clinical outcome study for dysferlinopathy: an international multicenter study. Neurol Genet. 2016;2(4):e89.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  54. Burch PM, et al. Muscle-derived proteins as serum biomarkers for monitoring disease progression in three forms of muscular dystrophy. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2015;2(3):241–255.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  55. Spitali P, et al. Cross-sectional serum metabolomic study of multiple forms of muscular dystrophy. J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22(4):2442–2448.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  56. Moore U, et al. Myostatin and follistatin as monitoring and prognostic biomarkers in dysferlinopathy. Neuromuscul Disord. 2023;33(2):199–207.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  57. Doody A, et al. Defining clinical endpoints in limb girdle muscular dystrophy: a GRASP-LGMD study. BMC Neurol. 2024;24(1):96.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  58. Rouillon J, et al. Serum proteomic profiling reveals fragments of MYOM3 as potential biomarkers for monitoring the outcome of therapeutic interventions in muscular dystrophies. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(17):4916–4932.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  59. Lampe M, et al. Clathrin coated pits, plaques and adhesion. J Struct Biol. 2016;196(1):48–56.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  60. Anderson RG, et al. Role of the coated endocytic vesicle in the uptake of receptor-bound low density lipoprotein in human fibroblasts. Cell. 1977;10(3):351–364.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  61. Yokoyama C, et al. SREBP-1, a basic-helix-loop-helix-leucine zipper protein that controls transcription of the low density lipoprotein receptor gene. Cell. 1993;75(1):187–197.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  62. Sellers SL, et al. Increased nonHDL cholesterol levels cause muscle wasting and ambulatory dysfunction in the mouse model of LGMD2B. J Lipid Res. 2018;59(2):261–272.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  63. Sun Z, et al. Dyslipidemia in muscular dystrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2023;10(4):505–516.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  64. Xu H, et al. The metabolomic plasma profile of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: providing new evidence for its pathogenesis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023;18(1):273.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  65. Amor F, et al. Cholesterol metabolism is a potential therapeutic target in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2021;12(3):677–693.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  66. White Z, et al. High prevalence of plasma lipid abnormalities in human and canine Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies depicts a new type of primary genetic dyslipidemia. J Clin Lipidol. 2020;14(4):459–469.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  67. Srivastava NK, et al. High resolution NMR based analysis of serum lipids in Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients and its possible diagnostic significance. NMR Biomed. 2010;23(1):13–22.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  68. Milad N, et al. Increased plasma lipid levels exacerbate muscle pathology in the mdx mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Skelet Muscle. 2017;7(1):19.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  69. Chassagne J, et al. Early endosome disturbance and endolysosomal pathway dysfunction in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Am J Pathol. 2025;195(9):1627–1642.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  70. Jaber A, et al. Lysosomal damage is a therapeutic target in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Sci Adv. 2025;11(43):eadv6805.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  71. Boissart C, et al. Differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells of cortical neurons of the superficial layers amenable to psychiatric disease modeling and high-throughput drug screening. Transl Psychiatry. 2013;3(8):e294.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  72. Darville H, et al. Human pluripotent stem cell-derived cortical neurons for high throughput medication screening in autism: a proof of concept study in SHANK3 haploinsufficiency syndrome. EBioMedicine. 2016;9:293–305.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  73. Schmieder R, Edwards R. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(6):863–864.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  74. Dobin A, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(1):15–21.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  75. Li H, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(16):2078–2079.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  76. Anders S, et al. HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(2):166–169.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  77. Bray NL, et al. Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34(5):525–527.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  78. Love MI, et al. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  79. Chen EY, et al. EnrichR: interactive and collaborative HTML5 gene list enrichment analysis tool. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:128.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  80. Wu T, et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: a universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation (Camb). 2021;2(3):100141.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (March 23, 2026): Electronic publication

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Funding support
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts