Usage Information
Abstract
TLR7 agonists are promising immunostimulatory agents for the treatment of chronic infections and cancer. However, their systemic toxicity remains a challenge. In this study, SA-5, a potentially novel liver-targeted, orally available TLR7 agonist, was evaluated for pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy in young and aged macaques across 1–10 mg/kg repeated doses. Safety was evaluated through hematologic, biochemical, and flow cytometric profiling, while efficacy was assessed via IFN-α production, gene expression of IFN-stimulated genes, and plasmacytoid dendritic cell activation. A principal component analysis–based (PCA-based) composite scoring system was used to integrate multimodal parameters. SA-5 induced dose-dependent type I IFN with limited systemic inflammation, with 3 mg/kg showing optimal balance. SA-5 had comparable immunostimulatory activity to GS-9620 but with reduced adverse biomarker shifts. In aged macaques, efficacy was maintained with modestly increased safety responses. These findings support SA-5 as a safer next-generation TLR7 agonist effective across age groups, highlighting integrated biomarker profiling in preclinical immunomodulatory drug development.
Authors
Shokichi Takahama, Takahiro Tomiyama, Sachiyo Yoshio, Yuta Nagatsuka, Hirotomo Murakami, Takuto Nogimori, Mami Kochi, Shoko Ochiai, Hidenori Kimura, Akihisa Fukushima, Tatsuya Kanto, Takuya Yamamoto
Usage data is cumulative from November 2025 through May 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,788 | 36 |
| 501 | 2 | |
| Figure | 516 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 120 | 2 |
| Citation downloads | 240 | 0 |
| Totals | 3,165 | 40 |
| Total Views | 3,205 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
