Usage Information
Abstract
Liver macrophages are central in maintaining hepatic homeostasis and mediating immune responses during liver injury, including fibrosis. Macrophages may have proinflammatory or antiinflammatory properties, but which properties influence fibrosis remains unclear. To explore the role of macrophages in liver fibrosis, we performed single-cell RNA-seq in a mouse model of liver injury and found that macrophage diversity was increased. Marco was among the most significantly upregulated genes, and a population of Marcohi macrophages increased with injury and spatially segregated to nonfibrotic areas. The macrophage receptor with collagenous structure (MARCO) protein is a scavenger receptor expressed by specific subsets of macrophages, and its role in liver fibrosis is unclear. In vitro induction of Marco in bone marrow–derived macrophages decreased proinflammatory gene expression, increased antiinflammatory and antifibrotic gene expression, and enhanced phagocytosis, indicating a restorative phenotype. Adoptive transfer of MARCO+ macrophages in a mouse model of liver fibrosis reduced the expression of extracellular matrix–associated (ECM-associated) genes in hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) and reduced collagen deposition, which did not occur with the transfer of MARCO– macrophages. Therefore, MARCO+ macrophages have a tissue restorative role in the liver and attenuate fibrogenesis through interaction with HSCs, thereby providing a potential therapeutic pathway for liver fibrosis.
Authors
Sofia Jerez, Shawna A. Cooper, Usman Yaqoob, Maleeha F. Kalaiger, Abid A. Anwar, Mandy Wong, Bushra Arif, Luke C. Doskey, Maria Hernandez-Tejero, William A. Sherman, Ruben De Boeck, Ying Li, Moira B. Hilscher, Enis Kostallari, Nidhi Jalan-Sakrikar, Sheng Cao, Vijay H. Shah
Usage data is cumulative from March 2026 through May 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,327 | 0 |
| 271 | 0 | |
| Figure | 458 | 0 |
| Table | 34 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 207 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 60 | 0 |
| Totals | 2,357 | 0 |
| Total Views | 2,357 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
