Usage Information
Abstract
Hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) promote lung protection and pathogen eradication during acute lung injury. We, therefore, tested the theory that pharmacologic stabilization of HIFs dampens lung injury during SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Initial studies in murine SARS-CoV-2 models showed improved outcomes after treatment with the FDA-approved HIF stabilizer vadadustat. Subsequent studies in genetic models implicated alveolus-expressed Hif1a in mediating lung protection. Therefore, we performed a randomized, double-blinded, multicenter phase II trial in patients admitted for SARS-CoV-2 infection and concomitant hypoxia (SpO2 ≤ 94%). Patients (n = 448) were randomized to oral vadadustat (900 mg/day) or placebo for up to 14 days. Safety events were similar between the 2 groups. Vadadustat treatment induced surrogate HIF target genes. The primary outcome of severe lung injury requiring high oxygen support on day 14 occurred in 43 patients in the vadadustat group and 53 patients in the placebo group (estimated probability, 13.3% vs. 16.9%). Among patients with baseline fraction of inspired oxygen of 80% or higher (n = 106), the estimated probability of the primary outcome was 12.1% (vadadustat) versus 79.1% (placebo), indicating an even greater benefit in patients with more severe baseline hypoxia. HIF1A is a likely therapeutic target during SARS-CoV-2–associated lung injury. Robust clinical trials of HIF stabilizers during pathogen-associated lung injury are warranted.
Authors
Bentley Bobrow, Samuel D. Luber, Paul Potnuru, Katherine Figarella, Jieun Kim, Yanyu Wang, In Hyuk Bang, David Robinson, Paulina B. Sergot, Steven K. Burke, Tingting Mills, Constanza de Dios, Robert Suchting, George W. Williams, Adit A. Ginde, Yafen Liang, Hongfang Liu, Charles Green, Marie-Francoise Doursout, Alparslan Turan, Daniel I. Sessler, Xiaoyi Yuan, Holger K. Eltzschig
Usage data is cumulative from June 2025 through February 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,989 | 157 |
| 542 | 55 | |
| Figure | 301 | 0 |
| Table | 34 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 262 | 16 |
| Citation downloads | 96 | 0 |
| Totals | 3,224 | 228 |
| Total Views | 3,452 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
