Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Protein-protein interaction–interfering peptide rescues dysregulated NMDA receptor signaling
Robert E. Featherstone, Hongbin Li, Ameet S. Sengar, Karin E. Borgmann-Winter, Olya Melnychenko, Lindsey M. Crown, Ray L. Gifford, Felix Amirfathi, Anamika Banerjee, AiVi Tran, Krishna Parekh, Margaret Heller, Wenyu Zhang, Robert J. Gallop, Adam D. Marc, Pragya Komal, Michael W. Salter, Steven J. Siegel, Chang-Gyu Hahn
Robert E. Featherstone, Hongbin Li, Ameet S. Sengar, Karin E. Borgmann-Winter, Olya Melnychenko, Lindsey M. Crown, Ray L. Gifford, Felix Amirfathi, Anamika Banerjee, AiVi Tran, Krishna Parekh, Margaret Heller, Wenyu Zhang, Robert J. Gallop, Adam D. Marc, Pragya Komal, Michael W. Salter, Steven J. Siegel, Chang-Gyu Hahn
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cell biology Neuroscience

Protein-protein interaction–interfering peptide rescues dysregulated NMDA receptor signaling

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The complex and heterogeneous genetic architecture of neuropsychiatric illnesses compels us to look beyond individual risk genes for therapeutic strategies and target the interactive dynamics and convergence of their protein products. A mechanistic substrate for convergence of synaptic neuropsychiatric risk genes are protein-protein interactions (PPIs) in the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) complex. NMDAR hypofunction in schizophrenia is associated with hypoactivity of Src kinase, resulting from convergent alterations in PPIs of Src with its partners. Of these, the association of Src with PSD-95, which inhibits the activity of this kinase in the NMDAR complex, is known to be increased in schizophrenia. Here, we devised a strategy to suppress the inhibition of Src by PSD-95 by employing a cell-penetrating and Src-activating PSD-95 inhibitory peptide (TAT-SAPIP). TAT-SAPIP enhanced synaptic NMDAR currents in Src+/– and Sdy–/– mice manifesting NMDAR hypofunction phenotypes. Chronic intracerebroventricularly (ICV) injection of TAT-SAPIP rescued cognitive deficits in trace fear conditioning in Src +/– mice. Moreover, TAT-SAPIP enhanced Src activity in synaptoneurosomes derived from dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of 14 patients. We propose blockade of the Src–PSD-95 interaction as a proof of concept for the use of interfering peptides as a therapeutic strategy to reverse NMDAR hypofunction in schizophrenia and other illnesses.

Authors

Robert E. Featherstone, Hongbin Li, Ameet S. Sengar, Karin E. Borgmann-Winter, Olya Melnychenko, Lindsey M. Crown, Ray L. Gifford, Felix Amirfathi, Anamika Banerjee, AiVi Tran, Krishna Parekh, Margaret Heller, Wenyu Zhang, Robert J. Gallop, Adam D. Marc, Pragya Komal, Michael W. Salter, Steven J. Siegel, Chang-Gyu Hahn

×

Figure 1

TAT-SAPIP reduces Src–PSD-95 association, and TAT-SAPIP rescues decreased synaptic NMDAR currents.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
TAT-SAPIP reduces Src–PSD-95 association, and TAT-SAPIP rescues decrease...
(A and B) The effects of TAT-SAPIP on Src–PSD-95 association. Rat primary cortical neurons were treated with TAT-SAPIP with or without 10 μM NMDA + 1 μM glycine. Synaptosomal extracts were immunoprecipitated for PSD-95 and probed for Src. Src–PSD-95 association was significantly decreased in the TAT-SAPIP treatment group. (A) Graphic representation. (B) Representative blots. (C) Scatter plot of NMDAR EPSC peak amplitude over time from WT mice CA1 pyramidal neurons with or without intracellularly applied TAT-SAPIP peptide. Black bar above the plot indicates the duration of intracellular peptide application. Representative average NMDAR EPSC traces recorded at membrane potential of +60 mV at the times indicated (1 and 2). (D) Histogram representation of normalized NMDAR EPSC amplitude for each group at times denoted by the number 2 in C. Significant difference was observed in WT treated with TAT-SAPIP (161.1% ± 13.8% of baseline, n = 10) versus without TAT-SAPIP (99.4% ± 5.2% of baseline, n = 5 without peptide) (P = 0.008). With TAT-SAPIP treatment, significance was detected between WT (161.1% ± 13.8% of baseline, n = 10) and Src–/– (109.2% ± 10.0% of baseline, n = 6, P = 0.013). Significant difference was also observed between Src+/– (165.0% ± 9.4% of the baseline, n = 8) and Src–/– groups both treated with TAT-SAPIP (P = 0.014). No differences were observed between WT and Src+/– when treated with TAT-SAPIP. Black dots represent individual data points. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. One-way ANOVA followed by Holm-Šidák post hoc test was used for statistic comparisons in D. Data represent mean ± SEM.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts