Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2025;10(4):e187328. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.187328.
Abstract
Cerebral endothelial cell (EC) injury and blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability contribute to neuronal injury in acute neurological disease states. Preclinical experiments have used animal models to study this phenomenon, yet the response of human cerebral ECs to BBB disruption remains unclear. In our phase I clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04528680), we used low-intensity pulsed ultrasound with microbubbles (LIPU/MB) to induce transient BBB disruption of peritumoral brain in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. We found radiographic evidence that BBB integrity was mostly restored within 1 hour of this procedure. Using single-cell RNA sequencing and transmission electron microscopy, we analyzed the acute response of human brain ECs to ultrasound-mediated BBB disruption. Our analysis revealed distinct EC gene expression changes after LIPU/MB, particularly in genes related to neurovascular barrier function and structure, including changes to genes involved in the basement membrane, EC cytoskeleton, and junction complexes, as well as caveolar transcytosis and various solute transporters. Ultrastructural analysis showed that LIPU/MB led to a decrease in luminal caveolae, the emergence of cytoplasmic vacuoles, and the disruption of the basement membrane and tight junctions, among other things. These findings suggested that acute BBB disruption by LIPU/MB led to specific transcriptional and ultrastructural changes and could represent a conserved mechanism of BBB repair after neurovascular injury in humans.
Authors
Andrew Gould, Yu Luan, Ye Hou, Farida V. Korobova, Li Chen, Victor A. Arrieta, Christina Amidei, Rachel Ward, Cristal Gomez, Brandyn Castro, Karl Habashy, Daniel Zhang, Mark Youngblood, Crismita Dmello, John Bebawy, Guillaume Bouchoux, Roger Stupp, Michael Canney, Feng Yue, M. Luisa Iruela-Arispe, Adam M. Sonabend
Usage data is cumulative from December 2024 through December 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 3,056 | 327 |
| 706 | 117 | |
| Figure | 588 | 6 |
| Supplemental data | 177 | 11 |
| Citation downloads | 157 | 0 |
| Totals | 4,684 | 461 |
| Total Views | 5,145 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
