Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Natural history study of hepatic glycogen storage disease type IV and comparison to Gbe1ys/ys model
Rebecca L. Koch, … , Claudia Soler-Alfonso, Priya S. Kishnani
Rebecca L. Koch, … , Claudia Soler-Alfonso, Priya S. Kishnani
Published June 24, 2024
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2024;9(12):e177722. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.177722.
View: Text | PDF
Clinical Research and Public Health Genetics Hepatology

Natural history study of hepatic glycogen storage disease type IV and comparison to Gbe1ys/ys model

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Background Glycogen storage disease type IV (GSD IV) is an ultrarare autosomal recessive disorder that causes deficiency of functional glycogen branching enzyme and formation of abnormally structured glycogen termed polyglucosan. GSD IV has traditionally been categorized based on primary hepatic or neuromuscular involvement, with hepatic GSD IV subclassified as discrete subtypes: classic (progressive) and nonprogressive.Methods To better understand the progression of liver disease in GSD IV, we present clinical and histopathology data from 23 patients from around the world and characterized the liver involvement in the Gbe1ys/ys knockin mouse model.Results We propose an alternative to the established subtype-based terminology for characterizing liver disease in GSD IV and recognize 3 tiers of disease severity: (i) “severe progressive” liver disease, (ii) “intermediate progressive” liver disease, and (iii) “attenuated” liver disease. Analysis of liver pathology revealed that risk for liver failure cannot be predicted from liver biopsy findings alone in individuals affected by GSD IV. Moreover, analysis of postmortem liver pathology from an individual who died over 40 years after being diagnosed with nonprogressive hepatic GSD IV in childhood verified that liver fibrosis did not regress. Last, characterization of the liver involvement in a mouse model known to recapitulate the adult-onset neurodegenerative form of GSD IV (Gbe1ys/ys mouse model) demonstrated hepatic disease.Conclusion Our findings challenge the established subtype-based view of GSD IV and suggest that liver disease severity among patients with GSD IV represents a disease continuum.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02683512Funding None

Authors

Rebecca L. Koch, Bridget T. Kiely, Su Jin Choi, William R. Jeck, Leticia S. Flores, Vikrant Sood, Seema Alam, Gilda Porta, Katy LaVecchio, Claudia Soler-Alfonso, Priya S. Kishnani

×

Figure 2

Evaluation of extent of liver fibrosis by elastography, biopsy, and conventional imaging studies in patients with hepatic GSD IV.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Evaluation of extent of liver fibrosis by elastography, biopsy, and conv...
Findings from liver biopsies, conventional imaging studies (USG, CT, MRI), and elastography studies (TE, SWE, ARFI, MRE) are shown for patients with at least 1 available elastography measurement in order of current age (youngest to oldest). Unless deceased, the ends of timelines indicate age at latest follow-up. Invasive (biopsy) and noninvasive (elastography) assessments of hepatic fibrosis were classified based on a color-coding scheme, with darker shades of red corresponding to greater severity. The degree of fibrosis was based on original pathology reports. Elastography results were coded as demonstrating normal liver stiffness, mildly increased stiffness, or severely increased stiffness. Conventional imaging studies were coded based on radiology reports according to whether there was evidence of hepatic parenchymal abnormalities and CEPH. (A) Patient C16: TE at 1.6 years of age showed liver stiffness of 66 kPa, above the cutoff of 11.5 kPa predictive of F4 fibrosis in children. (B) Patient C10: Per reference ranges given in the imaging reports, SWV of 1.0 m/s at age 4.5 years was normal, and SWV of 1.65 at age 5.0 years was consistent with F1 fibrosis range. (C) Patient C18: ARFI SWV at age 5.3 years (1.25 m/s) and 7.3 years (1.17 m/s) was within normal range based on published reference ranges. MRE at 7.3 years (2.81 kPa) was consistent with mildly elevated stiffness compared with normal range of < 2.75 kPa given in the imaging report. (D) Patient C12: MRE at 8.4 years (1.74 kPa) was normal based on reference range of < 2.75 kPa given in the imaging report. USG, ultrasonography; CEPH, clinically evident portal hypertension; CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MRE, magnetic resonance elastography; SWE, shear wave elastography; SWV, shear wave velocity; ARFI, acoustic radiation force impulse elastography; TE, transient elastography.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts