Usage Information
Abstract
Diamond-Blackfan anemia syndrome (DBA) is a ribosomopathy associated with loss-of-function variants in more than 20 ribosomal protein (RP) genes. Here, we report the genetic, functional, and biochemical dissection of 2 multigenerational pedigrees with variants in RPL17, a large ribosomal subunit protein–encoding gene. Affected individuals had clinical features and erythroid proliferation defects consistent with DBA. Further, RPL17/uL22 depletion resulted in anemia and micrognathia in zebrafish larvae, and in vivo complementation studies indicated that RPL17 variants were pathogenic. Lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) derived from patients displayed a ribosomal RNA maturation defect reflecting haploinsufficiency of RPL17. The proteins encoded by RPL17 variants were not incorporated into ribosomes, but 10%–20% of 60S ribosomal subunits contained a short form of 5.8S rRNA (5.8SC), a species that is marginal in normal cells. These atypical 60S subunits were actively engaged in translation. Ribosome profiling showed changes of the translational profile, but those are similar to LCLs bearing RPS19 variants. These results link an additional RP gene to DBA. They show that ribosomes can be modified substantially by RPL17 haploinsufficiency but support the paradigm that translation alterations in DBA are primarily related to insufficient ribosome production rather than to changes in ribosome structure or composition.
Authors
Florence Fellmann, Carol Saunders, Marie-Françoise O’Donohue, David W. Reid, Kelsey A. McFadden, Nathalie Montel-Lehry, Cong Yu, Mingyan Fang, Jianguo Zhang, Beryl Royer-Bertrand, Pietro Farinelli, Narjesse Karboul, Jason R. Willer, Lorraine Fievet, Zahurul Alam Bhuiyan, Alissa L.W. Kleinhenz, Julie Jadeau, Joy Fulbright, Carlo Rivolta, Raffaele Renella, Nicholas Katsanis, Jacques S. Beckmann, Christopher V. Nicchitta, Lydie Da Costa, Erica E. Davis, Pierre-Emmanuel Gleizes
Usage data is cumulative from December 2024 through December 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,564 | 343 |
| 189 | 68 | |
| Figure | 426 | 2 |
| Table | 53 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 246 | 25 |
| Citation downloads | 118 | 0 |
| Totals | 2,596 | 438 |
| Total Views | 3,034 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
