Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Molecular mechanism responsible for sex differences in electrical activity of mouse pancreatic β cells
Noelia Jacobo-Piqueras, … , Stefanie M. Geisler, Petronel Tuluc
Noelia Jacobo-Piqueras, … , Stefanie M. Geisler, Petronel Tuluc
Published February 15, 2024
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2024;9(6):e171609. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.171609.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cell biology Endocrinology

Molecular mechanism responsible for sex differences in electrical activity of mouse pancreatic β cells

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

In humans, type 2 diabetes mellitus shows a higher prevalence in men compared with women, a phenotype that has been attributed to a lower peripheral insulin sensitivity in men. Whether sex-specific differences in pancreatic β cell function also contribute is largely unknown. Here, we characterized the electrophysiological properties of β cells in intact male and female mouse islets. Elevation of glucose concentration above 5 mM triggered an electrical activity with a similar glucose dependence in β cells of both sexes. However, female β cells had a more depolarized membrane potential and increased firing frequency compared with males. The higher membrane depolarization in female β cells was caused by approximately 50% smaller Kv2.1 K+ currents compared with males but otherwise unchanged KATP, large-conductance and small-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels, and background TASK1/TALK1 K+ current densities. In female β cells, the higher depolarization caused a membrane potential–dependent inactivation of the voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (CaV), resulting in reduced Ca2+ entry. Nevertheless, this reduced Ca2+ influx was offset by a higher action potential firing frequency. Because exocytosis of insulin granules does not show a sex-specific difference, we conclude that the higher electrical activity promotes insulin release in females, improving glucose tolerance.

Authors

Noelia Jacobo-Piqueras, Tamara Theiner, Stefanie M. Geisler, Petronel Tuluc

×

Figure 3

Induced electrical activity in isolated β cells from male and female mice.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Induced electrical activity in isolated β cells from male and female mic...
(A) Sample traces of the induced electrical activity recorded at the rheobase current injection from both male (black, n = 23; 3 mice) and female (red, n = 21; 3 mice) isolated β cells. The rheobase was not significantly different between males and females (B) and neither was the number of APs (C). Both the plateau potential (D) and the threshold potential of the AP upstroke phase (E) were not significantly different, nor were the AP amplitude (F), time to peak (G), and 50% of the maximal amplitude (AP50) (H). The time to firing of the first AP (I) was significantly longer in male β cells, while the AP after hyperpolarization (AHP) component (J) was significantly higher in female β cells compared with males. All the parameters shown are calculated from the first AP at the rheobase. All values are mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 by 2-tailed Student’s t test.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts