Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Share this article
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article
Advertisement

Research ArticleAgingNeuroscience Open Access | 10.1172/jci.insight.168448

Aging alters mechanisms underlying voluntary movements in spinal motor neurons of mice, primates, and humans

Ryan W. Castro,1,2,3 Mikayla C. Lopes,2,3,4 Robert E. Settlage,5 and Gregorio Valdez2,3,6

1Neuroscience Graduate Program,

2Department of Molecular Biology, Cellular Biology, and Biochemistry,

3Center for Translational Neuroscience, Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science and Brown Institute for Translational Science, and

4Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, and Biochemistry Graduate Program, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

5Department of Advanced Research Computing, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.

6Department of Neurology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Address correspondence to: Gregorio Valdez, 70 Ship St, Providence, Rhode Island 02903, USA. Phone: 401.863.5625; Email: gregorio_valdez@brown.edu.

Find articles by Castro, R. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Neuroscience Graduate Program,

2Department of Molecular Biology, Cellular Biology, and Biochemistry,

3Center for Translational Neuroscience, Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science and Brown Institute for Translational Science, and

4Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, and Biochemistry Graduate Program, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

5Department of Advanced Research Computing, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.

6Department of Neurology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Address correspondence to: Gregorio Valdez, 70 Ship St, Providence, Rhode Island 02903, USA. Phone: 401.863.5625; Email: gregorio_valdez@brown.edu.

Find articles by Lopes, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Neuroscience Graduate Program,

2Department of Molecular Biology, Cellular Biology, and Biochemistry,

3Center for Translational Neuroscience, Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science and Brown Institute for Translational Science, and

4Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, and Biochemistry Graduate Program, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

5Department of Advanced Research Computing, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.

6Department of Neurology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Address correspondence to: Gregorio Valdez, 70 Ship St, Providence, Rhode Island 02903, USA. Phone: 401.863.5625; Email: gregorio_valdez@brown.edu.

Find articles by Settlage, R. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Neuroscience Graduate Program,

2Department of Molecular Biology, Cellular Biology, and Biochemistry,

3Center for Translational Neuroscience, Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science and Brown Institute for Translational Science, and

4Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, and Biochemistry Graduate Program, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

5Department of Advanced Research Computing, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.

6Department of Neurology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Address correspondence to: Gregorio Valdez, 70 Ship St, Providence, Rhode Island 02903, USA. Phone: 401.863.5625; Email: gregorio_valdez@brown.edu.

Find articles by Valdez, G. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |

Published May 8, 2023 - More info

Published in Volume 8, Issue 9 on May 8, 2023
JCI Insight. 2023;8(9):e168448. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.168448.
© 2023 Castro et al. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Published May 8, 2023 - Version history
Received: January 5, 2023; Accepted: March 15, 2023
View PDF
Abstract

Spinal motor neurons have been implicated in the loss of motor function that occurs with advancing age. However, the cellular and molecular mechanisms that impair the function of these neurons during aging remain unknown. Here, we show that motor neurons do not die in old female and male mice, rhesus monkeys, and humans. Instead, these neurons selectively and progressively shed excitatory synaptic inputs throughout the soma and dendritic arbor during aging. Thus, aged motor neurons contain a motor circuitry with a reduced ratio of excitatory to inhibitory synapses that may be responsible for the diminished ability to activate motor neurons to commence movements. An examination of the motor neuron translatome (ribosomal transcripts) in male and female mice reveals genes and molecular pathways with roles in glia-mediated synaptic pruning, inflammation, axonal regeneration, and oxidative stress that are upregulated in aged motor neurons. Some of these genes and pathways are also found altered in motor neurons affected with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and responding to axotomy, demonstrating that aged motor neurons are under significant stress. Our findings show mechanisms altered in aged motor neurons that could serve as therapeutic targets to preserve motor function during aging.

Graphical Abstract
graphical abstract
Introduction

The ability to command voluntary movements progressively erodes during normal aging, characterized by deficits in gait speed, balance, and control of fine motor skills (1–3). In this regard, spinal cord motor neurons have been extensively studied because they are essential for voluntary movement (4–6). Spinal motor neurons are the largest neurons in the spinal cord with expansive dendritic arbors and long axons that connect with skeletal muscle fibers. Within the spinal cord, motor neurons form tens of thousands of excitatory (glutamatergic and cholinergic) and inhibitory (GABAergic and glycinergic) synapses (7) along their dendritic arbor and soma. These synapses contain the information required to execute fine and complex motor commands (8) and are together referred to as the motor circuitry. Once activated, motor neurons drive muscle contraction by releasing neurotransmitters from their axon terminals at neuromuscular junctions (NMJs) (9). In addition to integrating and relaying all motor commands through neurotransmission, motor neurons release molecules such as neuregulin-1, z-agrin, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor that are essential for the formation and maintenance of motor synapses (10).

A number of deleterious changes in motor neurons, particularly in their axons, have been linked to age-related impairments of motor function. Motor axons have been shown to lose the ability to transmit motor signals from the spinal cord to the NMJ with high fidelity. This is due to impaired propagation of action potentials (11), aberrant discharge of acetylcholine at the NMJ (12), redistribution or complete loss of active zones at the presynapse (13), and degeneration of axon terminals (14–18). In stark contrast to these changes in motor axons, the status of aged motor neurons within the spinal cord, both at a cellular and molecular level, is much less clear. For instance, there are varied reports on the extent to which aging impacts the number and size of motor neurons (14, 17, 19–33). A possible explanation for these findings may be differences in methods of quantifying motor neuron loss, including the use of indirect methods, such as counting motor axons in the ventral root or sciatic nerve or labeling motor neurons with nonspecific markers. Regardless, the question of whether motor neurons degenerate prior to loss of motor function with aging remains debated. There is even less known about the impact of aging on the motor dendritic arbor and the synapses it forms with other neurons in the central and peripheral nervous systems. Additionally, the molecular composition of aging motor neurons has yet to be defined. These major gaps in knowledge must be filled to identify the mechanisms by which motor neurons contribute to age-related motor deficits.

In this study, we used complementary approaches to identify the cellular and molecular features of aging spinal motor neurons in mice of both sexes, rhesus monkeys, and humans. We used multiple labeling methods, including IHC, RNAscope, and transgenic labeling, to ascertain the fate of aging motor neurons. We show that neither the number nor size of motor neurons are significantly affected by aging. The dendritic arbor of motor neurons is also largely unchanged with age. However, aging results in the selective loss of excitatory synaptic inputs from the soma and dendritic arbor of motor neurons. We then profiled the translatome of motor neurons using ribosome-associated mRNA to identify molecular features that are altered by aging. We demonstrate that aged motor neurons differentially express genes with roles in synaptic plasticity, immune activation, axonal regeneration, and oxidative stress. This aging transcriptional signature is largely shared by male and female mice. Additionally, aging motor neurons recruit similar axonal regeneration pathways as axotomized and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis–affected (ALS-affected) motor neurons. These data provide the framework to target specific cellular sites and molecular pathways to stave off the deleterious effects of aging on motor neurons in different species and in both sexes.

Results

Motor neuron number and size do not significantly change during aging. To ascertain the impact of aging on spinal motor neurons, we examined these neurons in aged male and female mice. We first measured the density of motor neuron soma in coronal sections of the lumbar spinal cord of 3 month and 22- to 24-month-old mice, an age at which motor function is in decline (34). We used multiple labeling techniques to ensure that motor neurons were specifically counted. Our techniques included IHC to identify large NeuN+ neuronal soma surrounded by vesicular acetylcholine transporter+ (VAChT+) synaptic puncta (Figure 1, A and B, and Supplemental Figure 1, E and F; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.168448DS1) or choline transporter+ (ChT+) soma (Supplemental Figure 1, A and B) in the ventral horn; RNAscope to visualize choline acetyltransferase (Chat) mRNA+ soma (Supplemental Figure 1, C and D); and use of Chat-Cre;Ai14 mice, herein referred to as Chat-Cre;tdTomato mice, plus PACT-CLARITY tissue clearing to examine hundreds of tdTomato-labeled motor neurons (Figure 1, C and D). Using these complementary approaches, we found no difference in the density of motor neurons in the lumbar spinal cord in aged compared with young male (Figure 1E) or female (Supplemental Figure 1G) mice. We therefore conclude that loss of motor neurons is not a primary driver of age-related motor deficits in mice.

Motor neuron numbers and sizes are stable in aged spinal cords.Figure 1

Motor neuron numbers and sizes are stable in aged spinal cords. (A–D) Representative images of α-motor neurons in young adult (top row) and aged (bottom row) mouse spinal cords. (A and B) NeuN and VAChT IHC in males. (C and D) Transgenic tdTomato labeled motor neurons in Chat-Cre;tdTomato males. (E) Motor neuron density in lumbar spinal cord of male mice based on multiple methods of α-motor neuron labeling, including NeuN and VAChT IHC, ChT IHC, Chat in situ hybridization, and transgenic tdTomato expression in Chat-Cre;tdTomato mice. (F) Cross-sectional area (CSA) of α-motor neuron soma based on NeuN and VAChT IHC, ChT IHC, and Chat-Cre;tdTomato labeling in male mouse lumbar spinal cord. (G) Distribution of α-motor neuron CSAs in male mouse lumbar spinal cord. (H) Volume of tdTomato-labeled α-motor neurons in male Chat-Cre;tdTomato lumbar spinal cord. Unpaired, 2-sided t test used for all comparisons except G, where a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used. *P < 0.05 versus young. All values except G presented as mean ± SEM; n = 3. Scale bar: 20 μm.

We then explored the possibility that motor neurons decrease in size with advancing age, as has been shown to occur during the progression of motor diseases (35). We measured the cross-sectional area (CSA) of motor neuron soma from young and aged mice using each of the labeling techniques described above. We found that the average motor neuron soma CSA was not significantly affected by age in female or male mice (Figure 1F and Supplemental Figure 1I). To gain additional insights, we examined the distribution of motor neuron CSA and volume from Chat-Cre;tdTomato mice, from which we imaged hundreds of motor neurons per animal. A cumulative frequency histogram showed a statistically significant shift toward smaller soma sizes in the aged group (Figure 1G). We also found a moderate but nonsignificant decrease in overall soma volume (Figure 1H). Additional analysis using a size histogram shows that the largest motor neurons are preferentially affected and, therefore, account for the size reduction in aged Chat-Cre;tdTomato mice (Supplemental Figure 1H). These findings show that, while the number of motor neurons remains unchanged in aged animals, the largest motor neuron subtypes, which are more susceptible to diseases (36), decrease in size.

The dendritic tree does not degenerate in aged mice. We next examined the effect of aging on the dendritic arbor, which is where most motor signals are relayed to motor neurons (37–40). For this, we traced the dendritic arbor of motor neurons expressing tdTomato in 500 μm–thick coronal sections of lumbar spinal cords of young and aged Chat-Cre;tdTomato mice cleared using PACT-CLARITY (41). This approach made it possible to trace tdTomato-labeled dendrites at an average distance of 458 μm from the soma (Supplemental Video 1). Sholl analyses of traced dendrites did not reveal overt signs of dendritic arbor degeneration in aged mice (Figure 2, A–F). This was corroborated by dendritic arbor convex hull area measurements, which showed the dendritic arbors of young and aged mice occupying a similar area (Figure 2, G and H). The dendritic diameter was also unchanged, except for the proximal region, in aged motor neurons (Figure 2I). Thus, aging has a limited effect on the morphology of the dendritic arbor of motor neurons in transgenic Chat-Cre;tdTomato mice.

The dendritic arbor does not degenerate in aged mice.Figure 2

The dendritic arbor does not degenerate in aged mice. (A and C) Representative traces of tdTomato-labeled motor neuron dendritic arbors in transverse plane in young (3 month) and aged (22 month) Chat-Cre;tdTomato mouse lumbar spinal cord following PACT-CLARITY tissue clearing. (B and D) Representative dendritic arbor traces in sagittal plane. Convex hull areas (CHA) depicted by red or yellow outlines. (E) Sholl analysis of motor neuron dendritic arbor complexity. (F) Mean K values of dendritic arbor complexity Sholl analysis. (G and H) CHA of dendritic arbors measured in transverse (G) or sagittal (H) planes of spinal cords. Data points represent individual motor neurons from 3 animals per age group. (I) Motor neuron dendrite thickness at 25, 100, and 150 μm from the soma. Unpaired, 2-sided t test used for all comparisons. *P < 0.05 versus young. All values presented as mean ± SEM; n = 3.

The motor circuitry selectively loses excitatory synapses during aging in mice. We asked if the motor circuitry, the compilation of synapses on motor neurons, undergoes significant changes during aging. We examined all major classes of motor neuron synaptic inputs, including cholinergic, glutamatergic, GABAergic, and glycinergic synapses, on the soma and dendritic arbor (Figure 3, A–D, and Supplemental Figure 2, A–F). We used 50 μm–thick L1 lumbar spinal cord sections from young and aged Chat-Cre;tdTomato mice to examine synaptic inputs along the entire surface of the soma and over an average distance of 302 μm of the dendritic arbor (Supplemental Figure 2, G and H). This robust analysis showed that excitatory synapses decrease with increasing age while the number of inhibitory synapses within the motor circuitry remain unchanged. We found decreased numbers of excitatory vesicular glutamate transporter 1+ (VGluT1+) and VGluT2+ synaptic puncta on motor neuron soma (Figure 3E) and dendrites (Figure 3F) as early as 12 months of age. Interestingly, the size of the remaining VGluT1+ and VGluT2+ synapses is unchanged in aged mice (Supplemental Figure 2, I and J), suggesting that they are suddenly and completely removed. VAChT synaptic inputs trended toward a decreased number on the soma of motor neurons at 24 months of age (Figure 3E), in line with our published observation (24). We also found that VAChT synaptic inputs significantly and progressively decrease in size during aging (Supplemental Figure 2K). Additional analysis showed that the number of these 3 excitatory synaptic inputs decreased significantly or trended lower in the entire ventral horn of aged mice (Figure 3G). By contrast, the number and size of inhibitory glutamic acid decarboxylase 67 (Gad67) and glycine transporter 2 (GlyT2) synaptic inputs on the motor neuron soma (Figure 3H) and dendrites (Figure 3I), as well as throughout the ventral horn (Figure 3J), remain unchanged in aged mice (Supplemental Figure 2, L and M).

The motor circuitry loses excitatory synapses and remodels during aging.Figure 3

The motor circuitry loses excitatory synapses and remodels during aging. (A–D) Representative images of VGluT1 (A and B) and Gad67 (C and D) puncta on tdTomato-labeled motor neurons in young and aged Chat-Cre;tdTomato mouse lumbar spinal cord. (E–G) Excitatory VGluT1, VGluT2, and VAChT synaptic density in mouse motor neuron soma (E), motor neuron dendrites (F), and ventral horn (G). (H–J) Inhibitory Gad67 and GlyT2 synaptic density in mouse motor neuron soma (H), motor neuron dendrites (I), and ventral horn (J). One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc used for all comparisons. **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001 versus 3 months. All values presented as mean ± SEM; n = 3. Scale bar: 20 μm.

Electron microscopy also reveals fewer synapses on the soma and dendrite of aged motor neurons. To validate the light microscopy findings above and generate additional insights, we examined motor neurons and their synapses using serial block face scanning electron microscopy (EM). This allowed us to perform a high-resolution analysis of age-related changes in synaptic inputs on the motor neuron soma and proximal dendrites. At 4 months of age, approximately 60% of the surface of motor neurons was covered by presynaptic boutons (Figure 4, A and C). However, this coverage was reduced to approximately 25% at 28 months (Figure 4, B and C). Likewise, aging reduced the synaptic coverage of proximal dendrites from nearly 60% at 4 months to approximately 40% at 28 months (Figure 4D). The loss of coverage is influenced by an apparent reduction in both the density and the sizes of synaptic boutons (Figure 4, E and F). EM revealed subcellular features at remaining aged synaptic inputs, suggestive of progressive degeneration and dysfunction that include morphological changes and improper apposition with the motor neuron soma (Figure 4, E and F).

EM analysis of motor neuron synaptic coverage.Figure 4

EM analysis of motor neuron synaptic coverage. (A and B) Representative images of motor neuron soma and proximal dendrites (green) and presynaptic boutons (magenta) in cross section in 3-month (A) and 28-month (B) mouse lumbar spinal cord. (C and D) Quantification of soma (C) and proximal dendrite (D) surface occupancy by synapses. (E and F) Somatic synapses are surrounded by thin proteoglycan-rich perineuronal network in the 3-month spinal cord. At 28 months, synaptic terminals are fewer and smaller with an overall reduced synaptic occupancy of motor neuron soma. *P < 0.05 versus young, unpaired, 2-sided t test. Data points represent individual motor neurons from 1 mouse. All values presented as mean ± SEM; n = 3. Scale bars: 10 μm (A and B) and 1 μm (E and F).

Aging reduces glutamatergic synaptic clustering along the dendritic arbor. The spatial organization of synaptic inputs has been proposed to be important for modulating the function of motor neurons as well as other neurons. Recent findings suggest that alterations to this spatial organization likely occur during periods of synaptic plasticity or neuronal stress. For instance, VGluT1+ synaptic input clustering along the dendrites of motor neurons is disrupted following axotomy, with the number of these inputs within 5 μm of their nearest neighbor decreasing significantly in axotomized compared with uninjured motor neurons (42). We thus asked if aging affects the spatial organization of motor synapses in mice. We used the previously defined criteria of quantifying nearest neighbor distances of synapses of the same type and comparing the percentage of dendritic synapses that are within a 5 μm nearest neighbor distance along the dendrite (42). We found VAChT+, VGluT1+, VGluT2+, GlyT2+, and Gad67+ synapses clustered along the dendrites of young adult motor neurons. In aged motor neurons, we found that the number of closely opposed VGluT1 (Figure 5, A–C) and VGluT2 (Supplemental Figure 3, A–C) synapses decreased. The number of VAChT clusters remained unchanged (Supplemental Figure 3, D–F), while GlyT2 clusters increased (Supplemental Figure 3, G–I) and Gad67 clusters were unchanged (Figure 5, D–F) in aged mice. Thus, aging negatively affected glutamatergic synapses in 2 ways. It decreased the total number as well as their clustering. In contrast, aging increased the number of inhibitory synapse clusters without altering the total number of these synapses.

Clustering is reduced in excitatory but not inhibitory inputs on aged motorFigure 5

Clustering is reduced in excitatory but not inhibitory inputs on aged motor neurons. (A) Schematic representation of the location of VGluT1+ glutamatergic synapses along a section of the dendritic arbor of motor neurons from 3- and 24-month-old mice. (B) Representative neuronal traces of VGluT1+ synapse locations along dendrites. S labels the motor neuron soma. (C) Quantification of the percentage of total dendritic synapses that have a nearest neighbor within the specified distance along the occupied dendrite. (D) Schematic representation of the location of Gad67+ GABAergic synapses along a section of the dendritic arbor of motor neurons from 3- and 24-month-old mice. (E) Representative neuronal traces of Gad67+ synapse locations along dendrites. S labels the motor neuron soma. (F) Quantification of the percentage of total dendritic synapses that have a nearest neighbor within the specified distance along the occupied dendrite. Unpaired, 2-sided t test used for all comparisons. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001 versus 3 months. All values presented as mean ± SEM; n = 3.

In rhesus monkeys and humans, excitatory motor synapses are also lost in old age. We then asked if motor neurons and the motor circuitry undergo similar changes in aging rhesus monkeys (Supplemental Figure 4, A and B). We examined the density, soma size, and dendrite width of motor neurons in the cervical spinal cords of young (6–11 years) and aged (28 years) rhesus monkeys. We found that there was no age-related change in any of these metrics (Supplemental Figure 4, C–E). We also examined the number and distribution of excitatory VGluT1+ and inhibitory Gad67+ synaptic inputs along the soma and proximal dendrites of motor neurons. Immunostaining revealed a trend toward a decrease in somatic and dendritic VGluT1+ synaptic inputs in aged motor neurons (Supplemental Figure 4F). As in mice, the density of Gad67+ synaptic inputs remained unchanged in aged rhesus monkey motor neurons (Supplemental Figure 4H). Analyses of synapses in the ventral horn showed the same trend (Supplemental Figure 4, G and I). These findings support published work from our lab (24) and findings above in mice that only excitatory synaptic inputs decrease with advancing age in both mice and rhesus monkeys.

Importantly, we assessed the impact of aging on motor neurons and their excitatory synaptic inputs in young adult (23–26 years) and elderly (75–76 years) cervical spinal cords of humans. We examined motor neuron density (Figure 6A) and size (Figure 6B) and found no age-related changes. We also examined VGluT1+ (Figure 6, C–F) and vesicular GABA transporter (VGAT) inhibitory (Figure 6, C, D, G, and H) synaptic inputs in motor neurons. We observed a trend toward fewer VGluT1+ synaptic inputs and no change in VGAT+ inputs on the soma of motor neurons (Figure 6C) and throughout the ventral horn (Figure 6D) of aged human spinal cords. Overall, these analyses in mice, rhesus monkeys, and humans show that the number of excitatory synaptic inputs on motor neurons decreases while inhibitory synaptic inputs remain unchanged during aging.

Profiling of human motor neurons and synapses during aging.Figure 6

Profiling of human motor neurons and synapses during aging. (A and B) Quantifications of motor neuron density (A) and soma size (B) reveal no significant changes with age. (C and D) The number of VGluT1+ and VGAT+ synapses on motor neuron soma (C) and in the ventral horn (D) are unchanged in aged spinal cord; however, a trend toward decreased VGluT1 synapses was observed. (E and F) Images of motor neurons (NeuN, red) and glutamatergic synapses (VGluT1, green) of young and aged humans. (G and H) Images of motor neurons (NeuN, red) and GABAergic synapses (VGAT, fuchsia) of young and aged humans. Unpaired, 2-sided t test used for all comparisons except C (VGluT1) and D (VGAT), where an unpaired, 2-sided t test with Welch’s correction was used. All values presented as mean ± SEM; n = 3. Scale bar: 20 μm.

Identification of molecular features of aging motor neurons. The molecular profile of aged spinal motor neurons has not been defined, to date. This information may be critical to prevent synaptic loss and other age-related changes in the motor system. To interrogate the molecular composition of aging motor neurons, we used RiboTag mice to specifically isolate midtranslation mRNA from motor neurons. RiboTag mice conditionally express hemagglutinin-tagged ribosomal protein L22 (HA-Rpl22) (43) (Figure 7A). We crossed this line with Chat-Cre mice to generate Chat-Cre;RiboTag mice. These mice were used to immunoprecipitate HA-Rpl22 ribosomes from Chat+ cholinergic neurons, of which motor neurons comprise a significant proportion, in the spinal cord. We confirmed presence of HA-Rpl22 protein in the spinal cord of Chat-Cre;RiboTag mice with an anti-HA immunoblot of immunoprecipitated ribosomes (Figure 7B; see complete unedited blots in the supplemental material). Importantly, we validated that isolated HA-Rpl22 ribosomes contain high levels of the motor neuron–specific transcripts Homeobox HB9 (Hb9) (44) and Chat (45) but lack transcripts for glial fibrillary acidic protein (Gfap), an astrocytic marker (46) (Figure 7C).

Molecular profile of aged motor neurons.Figure 7

Molecular profile of aged motor neurons. (A) The modified exon 4 sequence containing an HA tag is incorporated into the RPL22 gene following Cre expression under the Chat promoter in Chat-Cre;RiboTag mice. The endogenous exon 4 contains a stop codon. (B) Western blot analysis of whole-spinal cord input tissue and immunoprecipitated ribosomes reveals enrichment of Rpl22-HA by IP. Lanes were run on the same gel but were noncontiguous. (C) qPCR analysis of Gfap, Hb9, and Chat transcripts in RNA co-IP versus input fractions. (D) Proportion of differentially expressed genes (DEGs), relative to 3-month young adult controls, among 12-, 18-, and 24-month motor neuron transcriptomes. (E) Heatmap of read count Z scores of DEGs. (F) Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) of canonical pathways activated in early-stage (18 month) and late-stage (24 month) aged motor neurons. (G) Top IPA functions of 24-month motor neurons. (H) Expression levels of regeneration-associated genes in 12-, 18-, and 24-month motor neurons, as compared with 3 months of age. (I) Top upstream regulators of 24-month motor neurons. (J) Comparison of common DEGs in aged, axotomized, and 4-month-old SOD1G93A motor neurons. (K) Shared IPA canonical pathways in aged, axotomized, and 4-month-old SOD1G93A motor neurons. Values in C are presented as mean ± SEM. Values in G–I are presented as mean; n = 3–5.

We then profiled the translatome — all the mRNAs associated with ribosomes and, hence, in the process of being translated — of aging motor neurons from male and female Chat-Cre;RiboTag mice using RNA-Seq. We identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in aging motor neurons using a minimum read count of 5 and a P value of less than 0.05. In males, this analysis revealed a progressive age-related shift in the motor neuron translatome with the greatest proportion of DEGs found in 24-month-old compared with 3-month-old motor neurons (Figure 7, D and E). Upregulated genes comprised the majority of DEGs in 24-month-old motor neurons (133 of 142), as compared with motor neurons 3 months of age (Supplemental Figure 5). Among the downregulated DEGs in this age group (Supplemental Table 1) is Htr1b, which encodes the 1B serotonin receptor. Deletion of this gene in mice accelerates age-related loss of motor function (47). Other downregulated genes include Ppp1r1c, which has recently been shown to be a marker of α-motor neurons (48), and Sfrp1, which encodes a secreted protein that modulates microglial activation (49).

Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) of DEGs in 18- and 24-month-old motor neurons, as compared with motor neurons 3 months of age, revealed signaling pathways with roles in synaptic reorganization and plasticity (Figure 7F) — including IL-linked kinase (ILK) (50), WNT/β-catenin (51, 52), and complement (53, 54) — increased in the aged motor neuron translatome. IPA also suggests that aged motor neurons reduce expression of inflammatory genes but become prone to interactions with immune cells and to activating cell movement pathways, possibly in an attempt to regenerate their axonal terminals at NMJs (22) (Figure 7G). Among DEGs in aging motor neurons, a number have been previously shown to promote motor neuron axonal regeneration following axotomy or in ALS mouse models. These genes include Atf3 (55), Sprr1a (56), and Npy (57) (Figure 7H). Additionally, IPA shows that predicted upstream regulators of the aging motor neuron translatome include cytokines, such as Il33, Tnf, and Cxcl12, the transcriptional regulators Stat1 and Nfkb, and Tgfb (Figure 7I). Furthermore, we compared DEGs in 24- versus 3-month-old motor neurons with published data sets of transcriptional changes in axotomized and ALS-afflicted motor neurons (58). We found DEGs that are unique to each group, including 102 genes uniquely upregulated in aged motor neurons. We also found a number of genes that are shared between conditions and found 7 shared among all 3 conditions (Figure 7J), including C1qa, Cd63, Npy, Serpinb1a, Sprr1a, Tyrobp, and Vim. Many of the genes shared with one or both of these conditions are common neuronal stress-related genes, such as Atf3 (59). We also utilized these data sets to compare canonical pathways that are unique and shared between conditions. This comparison revealed that GP6 signaling, a pathway implicated in schizophrenia (60), and TREM1 signaling, which is related to inflammation and glial activation (61), are uniquely activated in aged motor neurons (Figure 7K).

To account for sex differences, we probed the translatome of female motor neurons in 3-, 12-, and 18-month-old Chat-Cre;RiboTag mice. Not surprisingly, the female motor neuron translatome was also altered by aging (Figure 8A and Supplemental Figure 6). We then compared the female data set with that from male mice up to 18 months of age. We found that there are increasing numbers of DEGs between male and female motor neurons at older ages (Figure 8, B and C). As expected, Y-linked genes were exclusively expressed in males (Figure 8D). We also found several collagens enriched in males compared with females at 18 months of age (Figure 8E). However, several age-related DEGs were shared by both sexes, in both their magnitude and directionality (Figure 8F). IPA analysis showed that many of the DEGs in aged female motor neurons are linked to canonical pathways (Figure 8G) and cellular functions (Figure 8H) unique to females and are also shared with males. Of potential relevance to age-related loss of motor synapses, the translatomes of both aged female and male motor neurons are enriched for genes with roles in the complement system and TREM1 signaling (Figure 8H). Both complement signaling (62–66) and TREM1 (67, 68) have been shown to mediate synaptic pruning by microglia; thus, motor neurons undergo molecular changes during aging that may cause microglia to target motor synapses.

Molecular profile of aged male and female motor neurons.Figure 8

Molecular profile of aged male and female motor neurons. (A) Heatmap of read count Z scores of DEGs in female motor neurons. (B) Numbers of DEGs in males versus female motor neurons at 3, 12, and 18 months of age. (C) Comparison of the number of common and unique DEGs. (D) Read counts of Y-linked genes in young and old male and female motor neurons. (E) Collagen genes are upregulated only in male motor neurons at 18 months old. (F) Fold change of shared DEGs between sexes shows that the magnitude of change is similar. (G) Shared and unique activated canonical pathways identified via IPA analysis in male and female motor neurons. (H) Shared and unique activated functions identified via IPA analysis in male and female motor neurons. Values in D are presented as mean ± SEM. Values in E, F, and H are presented as mean; n = 3–5.

To validate RNA-Seq findings, we examined expression of Sprr1a (Figure 7H) in young and aged mouse motor neurons using RNAscope (Supplemental Figure 7, A and B). This method showed that Sprr1a is highly expressed in a subset of aged motor neurons and absent from young adult motor neurons (Supplemental Figure 7C). We also examined expression of apolipoprotein E (Apoe), one of the most highly expressed and upregulated genes in motor neurons, in 24-month-old mice. We first used IHC to determine whether motor neurons in fact express and increase levels of ApoE protein during aging (Supplemental Figure 7, D and E). This analysis found ApoE trending toward elevated levels in aged motor neurons (Supplemental Figure 7F). We then used quantitative PCR (qPCR) to analyze Apoe levels in immunoprecipitated ribosomes from motor neurons of young and aged Chat-Cre;RiboTag mice. Apoe was again found elevated in aged motor neurons (Supplemental Figure 7G). These Apoe and Sprr1a findings strongly suggest that motor neurons age in a heterogeneous manner or at different rates within the same animal and spinal cord region.

Discussion

Summary and potential implications. This is the first study to our knowledge to holistically examine, on a cellular and molecular level, the impact of aging on motor neurons within the spinal cord of mice, rhesus monkeys, and humans. We used complementary techniques, including PACT-CLARITY tissue clearing, to reveal the cellular features of the soma and dendritic arbor of aged motor neurons. We demonstrate that spinal motor neurons were surprisingly resilient to aging in mice, monkeys, and humans. The number and overall morphology of these neurons did not significantly change with advancing age. However, these neurons progressively and selectively shed excitatory synaptic inputs from the soma and dendritic arbor. Thus, aged motor neurons contain a motor circuitry with a reduced ratio of excitatory to inhibitory synapses, which may be responsible for the diminished ability to activate motor neurons to commence movements. We also examined the motor neuron translatome (ribosomal transcripts) in both male and female mice. This strategy identified genes and molecular pathways with roles in glia-mediated synaptic pruning, axonal regeneration, inflammation, and oxidative stress. Some of these genes and pathways are also found altered in motor neurons affected with ALS or responding to axotomy, demonstrating that aged motor neurons are under substantial stress. Additionally, it revealed molecular similarities and differences between aging male and female motor neurons across the lifespan. Thus, this approach identified molecular pathways intrinsic to motor neurons that may contribute to degeneration of the motor circuitry and the NMJ during aging.

Likely source of motor dysfunction in the aged spinal cord. The literature concerning whether motor neurons are lost or atrophy during aging has been inconsistent for decades (17, 19–23, 26–33). While published studies have attempted to quantify motor neuron number and size, many did so via indirect or nonspecific labeling techniques and with small sample sizes. In this study, we sought to contribute new evidence to this debate by using several methods that directly label motor neurons. Each of our approaches revealed that there was no difference in the number of motor neurons between young and aged spinal cords across species. However, it is worth noting that aging caused a significant reduction in the size of motor neurons in Chat-Cre;tdTomato but not Wt mice. A frequency distribution analysis indicated that the largest motor neurons are preferentially affected and, therefore, account for the reduced size in aged Chat-Cre;tdTomato mice. The most parsimonious explanation for this observation is that expression of tdTomato may increase the susceptibility of large motor neurons to the stress of aging. This possibility is supported by a study showing that motor neurons expressing another fluorescence protein, YFP, prematurely exhibit signs of aging along their axons (69). The largest motor neurons are also most sensitive to ALS-induced stress, further lending support to the possibility that expression of tdTomato is a stressor to motor neurons, although minor since only their size was affected. Altogether, however, our data show that aging does not significantly alter the number of motor neurons. Aging also does not cause major changes to the morphology of motor neurons’ dendritic arbors. We therefore conclude that other age-related changes within the motor circuitry impair the capacity to commence and modulate movements in aged animals and humans.

Our data suggest that loss of excitatory synapses may be responsible for the compromised function of aged motor neurons in animals and humans. We found significant decreases in the number and clustering of both VGluT1+ and VGluT2 + synaptic inputs innervating aged motor neurons. We also found VAChT+ synaptic inputs trending lower in aged motor neurons. These findings are consistent with previous published studies from our group (24) and other groups (70), showing fewer excitatory synapses at the soma of aged motor neurons. Loss of excitatory synaptic inputs and clusters is also a feature of axotomized motor neurons (42), which is not surprising, given that aging also leads to degeneration of motor axon endings at NMJs (4). Overall, these findings show that aged motor neurons shed excitatory synapses, likely compromising the fidelity of motor commands emanating from proprioceptive sensory, cortical, subcortical, and spinal cord neurons.

In stark contrast to excitatory synaptic inputs, we found the number and clustering of inhibitory synaptic inputs either unchanged or rather moderately increased at aged motor neurons. Thus, aged motor neurons have a higher ratio of inhibitory to excitatory synapses, suggesting that they may have an increased threshold and latency for activation. This would, in turn, reduce the number of motor neurons recruited to relay motor commands. The higher threshold to activate motor neurons due to the increased proportion of inhibitory synapses, along with selective degeneration of some motor axon nerve endings at NMJs (14), may be a reason fewer motor units are found in old age (71). These changes would, in turn, reduce the number of muscle fibers recruited to perform a particular motor task. It may also delay the initiation and coordination of movements, resulting in poor balance and gait abnormalities. Support for these possibilities can be found in other published studies showing that motor deficits begin to be evident by middle age in mice and humans (72–74). However, it is possible that motor neurons alter their biophysical properties to adapt to changes in the motor circuitry to continue to integrate and relay motor commands without delays. Even if motor neurons undergo homeostatic adaptations to counteract the loss of excitatory synapses, they will fail to receive critical motor commands from many proprioceptive sensory neurons as well as excitatory cortical, subcortical, and spinal cord neurons. Thus, the loss of excitatory synaptic inputs alone likely compromises the fidelity of motor commands and, thus, would contribute to motor deficits, during aging.

Molecular mechanisms underlying age-related changes in motor circuits. Our translatome analysis identified specific genes and pathways, some with known roles at synapses, predicted to be activated or deactivated in aging motor neurons. It showed that complement signaling was activated in aged motor neurons, which has been well described as a microglia-mediated synaptic pruning mechanism (54, 75–77). Thus, motor neurons may cause the loss of their own synapses during aging by aberrantly activating microglia through complement signaling. We also found that the WNT/β-catenin signaling pathway was activated during both early- and late-stage aging. This pathway has been highly implicated in mediating synaptic plasticity (78), and reactivation of this pathway has been touted as a potential therapeutic intervention in Alzheimer’s disease (79). Interestingly, the predicted outcome of WNT/β-catenin signaling is increased intrinsic excitability (80). Thus, aged motor neurons may recruit this signaling pathway in response to the increased inhibitory tone to restore normal levels of excitability. Additionally, aged motor neurons may activate WNT/β-catenin signaling as well as the PI3K and ILK pathways, which have been suggested to act in conjunction to influence structural plasticity in the aged brain (50) in order to rewire the motor circuitry in response to loss of excitatory synaptic inputs.

The translatome data also indicate that a “tipping point” may not exist for motor neurons as they transition from a youthful to an old state. Rather, the translatome of motor neurons continuously and gradually changes throughout aging. While these changes may be continuous; they are not homogenous in nature. There are genes and pathways differentially expressed between middle-aged and old motor neurons, indicating that motor neurons deal with challenges unique to a given stage of the aging process by modulating specific genes and pathways.

We also report, for the first time to our knowledge, molecular differences and similarities between male and female motor neurons. Of particular note is our finding that collagen genes are significantly upregulated in aged male motor neurons but not in females. This suggests that male motor neurons may experience peripheral axonal degeneration first and, thus, activate genes intended to rebuild the extracellular matrix as the motor neurons attempt to regenerate and reinnervate their muscle targets. Altogether, these molecular and cellular discoveries demonstrate how aging affects motor neurons and provide leads to preserve voluntary movements during normal aging.

Methods

Mice

RiboTag (RRID:IMSR_JAX:011029; ref. 43), Chat-Cre (RRID:IMSR_JAX:006410; ref. 81), and Ai14 (herein referred to as tdTomato, RRID:IMSR_JAX:007914; ref. 82) mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory. C57BL/6 mice were obtained from the National Institute on Aging at the NIH. Hemizygous Chat-Cre mice were crossed with tdTomato mice to generate Chat-Cre;tdTomato mice, and with RiboTag mice to generate Chat-Cre;RiboTag mice. All mice were maintained on a mixed genetic background. Male and female mice were included in experiments, as described in the results. A CO2 chamber was used to sacrifice mice for tissue collection, following NIH guidelines. Animals were housed in a 12-hour light/dark cycle with access to food and water ad libitum in a pathogen-free environment.

Human spinal cord tissue

Fixed postmortem cervical spinal cord tissue from young and aged subjects with a clinical brain diagnosis of unaffected control was obtained from the University of Pittsburgh’s NIH NeuroBioBank Brain and Tissue Repository. Details of subjects are provided in Table 1. Coronal sections (50 μm) were collected with a vibratome and stored in PBS. Sections were washed 3× in PBS, incubated in blocking buffer (5% BSA, 5% donkey serum, 0.05% Triton X-100 in PBS) for 1 hour at room temperature, incubated in primary antibody diluted in blocking buffer 48 hours at 4°C, washed 3× in PBS, incubated in secondary antibody diluted 1:1,000 in blocking buffer for 4 hours at 4°C, washed 3× in PBS, mounted on gelatin covered slides, and covered in VECTASHIELD mounting medium (Vector Laboratories). Primary antibodies include mouse anti-NeuN (1:500, MilliporeSigma, MAB377, RRID: AB_2298772) and rabbit anti-vGlut1 (1:500, Synaptic Systems, 135303, RRID: AB_887875). Secondary antibodies include Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse (Invitrogen, A21121, RRID: AB_2535764) and Alexa Fluor 568 goat anti-rabbit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, A11011, RRID: AB_143157).

Table 1

Human cervical spinal cord demographic and postmodern interval (PMI) information

Nonhuman primate spinal cord tissue

Rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) spinal cord samples were obtained from the National Institutes of Health Animal Center. Samples were collected from males following euthanasia for unrelated clinical or experimental purposes; collection occurred within 2 hours of death. Once harvested, samples were immersed in ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 24–48 hours and then kept in cold 0.1 M PBS. Sectioning and IHC of nonhuman primate tissue was performed identically to C57BL/6 mouse spinal cord tissue, as described below. Antibodies include mouse anti-Gad67 (1:500, MilliporeSigma, MAB5406, RRID: AB_2278725), rabbit anti-VGluT1 (1:500, Synaptic Systems, 135303, RRID: AB_887875), and rabbit anti-VGAT (MilliporeSigma, AB5062P, RRID: AB_2301998).

Mouse tissue

Mice were intracardially perfused with 1× PBS, followed by 4% PFA. Spinal cords were dissected and postfixed for 4 hours at 4°C. Tissue clearing was performed on spinal cords collected from Chat-Cre;tdTomato mice according to Woo et al (41). Briefly, 500 μm coronal sections from the L1–L4 lumbar regions of the spinal cords were collected with a vibratome for clearing. Spinal cord sections were then embedded in a hydrogel and underwent several washes to elute lipids from the scaffold, rendering the samples translucent and significantly reducing refraction. Spinal cords collected from C57BL/6 mice and a separate cohort of Chat-Cre;tdTomato mice that underwent all IHC assays were not subjected to tissue clearing. The L1–L6 regions of the lumbar spinal cord from these mice were embedded in Tissue Freezing Medium (General Data, TFM-5) and 30 μm coronal sections were obtained with a cryostat. All spinal cord sections were mounted to gelatin coated slides, washed 3× in PBS, incubated in blocking buffer (5% BSA, 3% goat serum, and 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS); donkey serum was substituted for goat serum when necessary) for 1 hour at room temperature, incubated in primary antibody diluted in blocking buffer overnight at 4°C, washed 3× in PBS, incubated in secondary antibody diluted 1:1,000 in blocking buffer for 1 hour at room temperature, washed 3× in PBS, and covered in VECTASHIELD mounting medium (Vector Laboratories). Primary antibodies include goat anti-ChAT (1:500, MilliporeSigma, AB144P, RRID: AB_2079751), mouse anti-Gad67 (1:500, MilliporeSigma, MAB5406, RRID: AB_2278725), rabbit anti-Glyt2 (1:2,500, Synaptic Systems, 272003, RRID: AB_2619997), mouse anti-NeuN (1:500, MilliporeSigma, MAB377, RRID: AB_2298772), guinea pig anti-VAChT (1:500, MilliporeSigma, AB1588, RRID: AB_11214110), rabbit anti-vGlut1 (1:500, Synaptic Systems, 135303, RRID: AB_887875), guinea pig anti-vGlut2 (1:500, MilliporeSigma, AB2251-I, RRID: AB_2665454), guinea pig anti-GFAP (1:500, Nittobo Medical, FR101860, RRID: AB_2571709), and goat anti-ApoE (1:2,500, MilliporeSigma, AB947, RRID: AB_2258475). Secondary antibodies include Alexa Fluor 488 AffiniPure donkey anti–guinea pig IgG (H+L), (1:1,000, Jackson ImmunoResearch, 706-545-148, RRID: AB_2340472), Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti–mouse IgG2a (1:1,000, Invitrogen, A21131, RRID: AB_2535771), Alexa Fluor 647 goat anti–mouse IgG1 (1:1,000, Invitrogen, A21240, RRID: AB_2535809), and Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti–rabbit IgG (H+L), (1:1,000, Invitrogen, A21206, RRID: AB_2535792).

Confocal microscopy

Images were obtained with a Zeiss LSM 900 laser scanning confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy) using a 63× (1.4 numerical aperture) or 20× (0.8 numerical aperture) objective. Maximum intensity projections and stitching of tile scans were generated with Zeiss Zen software (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, RRID:SCR_013672).

Serial blockface EM

Sample preparation as well as imaging and data extraction were undertaken at the Cleveland Clinic (Cleveland, Ohio, USA) 3D-EM Ultrastructural Imaging and Computation Core. Unless otherwise noted, all reagents and materials were purchased from Electron Microscopy Sciences (EMS).

Sample preparation. Serial blockface imaging samples were prepared using an ASP1000 robotic stainer (Microscopy Innovations). Samples were inserted into the staining capsules. Using a programmed sequence (available from Microscopy Innovations), they were washed in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, incubated in a mix of 2% osmium tetroxide with 0.15% potassium ferrocyanide in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer for 2 hours on ice, washed in H2O, and then incubated in 0.1% thiocarbohydrazide at 60°C for 45 minutes. They were washed and incubated in 2% osmium tetroxide for at least 2 hours. They were washed again and incubated for at least 48 hours in aqueous Uranyl Acetate (saturated) at 4°C. After washes, they were incubated in lead aspartate stain, dehydrated in graded ethanols, washed in propylene oxide, and then incubated for 4–16 hours in 50:50 resin/solvent. They were then embedded in Epon 812–equivalent resin (Embed 812, Electron Microscopy Services) and cured for 48 hours. Samples were trimmed under a dissecting scope and imaged.

Sample imaging. Samples were imaged in 2 instruments. High-resolution montaged sets were generated in a Thermo Fisher Scientific (FEI) Volumescope2 system. Images were acquired at 2.0 kV in high-vacuum mode using T1 detector and Volumescope stage. Fields were imaged at 5 nm/pixel magnification, and images of 3,000 × 5,000 pixels wide were stitched to produce slices of 170 μm. Sets of 300–600 slices were collected at cut thicknesses of 50–60 nm, using MAPS2 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Montaging sets of small-image tiles reduced sample/beam drift. Samples were also imaged with a Zeiss Sigma VP scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy) with a 3View in chamber ultramicrotome (Gatan/Amaritech). These were imaged at 2.0 kV, using a 30 μm aperture in high-vacuum mode. Large fields of 10,000 × 12,000 pixels covered an area of 130 μm wide and did not require stitching. A series of 300–500 slices was generated with 60 nm slices and 7 nm/pixel resolution. The high-resolution sets were used to follow fine structures, while lower-resolution sets provided more rapid analysis of synaptic bouton occupancy of neuronal somas.

Analysis. Image stacks were aligned, cropped, and scaled as necessary using ImageJ/Fiji (NIH) software. Images were examined, annotated and measured using Reconstruct software (83). Three neurons from each spinal cord were assessed in a transverse section through the center of the cell and in slices through proximal dendrites in 4-month and 28-month spinal cords. For each motor neuron, a transverse section through the central neuronal soma was selected, and the synapses making contact with that slice were traced; the proportion of the neuronal surface that they occupied was also annotated. In this context, “occupied” included active zones of synapses and any other part of the axon that was in close apposition to the surface. To illustrate the surface occupancy, different images containing dendrites and cell somas were combined digitally using GNU image processing (GIMP) software.

Mouse motor neuron morphology

Analysis of motor neurons was performed on stitched, tile scan, Z stack confocal images of lumbar spinal cord coronal sections. Motor neuron density and soma size analysis was performed on spinal cord sections following NeuN/VAChT IHC, ChT IHC, or Chat RNAScope (density only) in WT mice or in cleared Chat-Cre;tdTomato mice. The number of sections analyzed for each method were as follows: NeuN/VAChT IHC (2 sections, beginning at L1), ChT IHC (2 sections, beginning at L1), Chat RNAScope (2 sections, beginning at L1), or Chat-Cre;tdTomato (8 sequential 500 μm sections, beginning at L1). In cleared Chat-Cre;tdTomato spinal cord, significant loss of tdTomato signal was typically observed at 300 μm below the tissue surface. Therefore, tissue at a depth of 300–500 μm was excluded from the analysis. In addition to labeling methods, motor neurons were identified by morphology, soma size, and location within the ventral horn. A grid was applied to the image using ImageJ for random selection of motor neurons for soma size analysis. Average numbers of motor neurons per ventral horn analyzed for soma size were as follows: NeuN/VAChT IHC (10.5 motor neurons), CHT IHC (6.8 motor neurons), Chat RNAScope (9.3 motor neurons), Chat-Cre;tdTomato (551.6 motor neurons). All neurons within each imaged section were included for motor density analysis. Soma volume and dendritic arbor complexity analyses were performed on a single cleared 500 μm coronal section from Chat-Cre;tdTomato mice. To calculate soma volume, the soma area of a given motor neuron was measured in serial optical sections along the entire z axis of the soma using ImageJ. Each optical section area was multiplied by the optical section height to obtain the soma volume within a given optical section. The volumes of the entire optical section series were then summed to estimate the total soma volume. To calculate dendritic arbor complexity, all visible dendrites of a given motor neuron were traced using the nTracer ImageJ plugin (84). Sholl analysis and convex hull area measurements of dendritic arbors were performed on traces using ImageJ. The diameters of all visible dendrites of a given motor neuron were measured at linear distances of 25, 100, and 150 μm from the soma using ImageJ.

Synaptic density and clustering

Analysis of synaptic density was performed on images acquired from 50 μm–thick coronal spinal cord sections following Gad67, GlyT2, vGluT1, or vGluT2 IHC. Spinal cord sections were collected via cryostat sectioning and imaged in Chat-Cre;tdTomato mice as described above. Three α-motor neurons per animal were randomly selected using the grid function in ImageJ for analysis. To calculate dendritic synaptic density, the entire visible length of all dendrites of a given motor neuron were traced, and the positions of all synaptic puncta along the traced dendrites were marked using the nTracer ImageJ plugin (84). The total number of synaptic puncta was divided by the total length of dendrites to calculate dendritic synaptic density. To calculate somatic synaptic density, the soma was traced in serial optical sections using ImageJ, and the volume was calculated as described above. Synaptic puncta located at the soma perimeter within each optical section were counted and summed for the entire optical section series. Puncta that spanned more than one optical section were only counted once. Somatic synaptic density was calculated by dividing the total number of puncta by the soma volume. Synaptic puncta in the ventral horn were counted using the analyze particles tool in ImageJ and standardized by the visible area of the ventral horn in each image.

Analysis of human and monkey tissue

Analyses of human and monkey synaptic density and motor neuron morphology were performed on coronal spinal cord sections following NeuN IHC using the methods described above. NeuN-labeled motor neurons were identified by morphology, soma size, and location within the ventral horn. Cervical monkey spinal cords were fixed and cryosectioned at 50 μm thickness for IHC. Two sections were analyzed for motor neuron density, with an average of 15.6 neurons analyzed per animal. On average, 3 motor neurons were analyzed for soma size, dendrite width, and synaptic density. Cervical human spinal cords were vibratome sectioned at 50 μm thickness, and IHC was performed while sections were free-floating in 12-well plates. Two sections were analyzed for motor neuron density, with an average of 15.1 motor neurons analyzed. On average, 3 motor neurons were analyzed for soma size, dendrite width, and synaptic density.

Immunoprecipitation of ribosome-mRNA complexes

Chat-Cre;RiboTag mice, in which Cre-dependent HA-tagged Rpl22 expression occurs in Chat+ cells (43), were used to enrich ribosome-associated mRNA from motor neurons of the spinal cord. Immunoprecipitation was performed as described previously (43, 85). Briefly, flash frozen spinal cords were lysed in ice-cold 1% NP40 (Roche, 11332473001) lysis buffer (50 mg tissue/mL lysis buffer) containing DTT (1 mM, MilliporeSigma, 646563), 1× protease inhibitor (MilliporeSigma, P8340), 0.4 units/μL RNasin Plus RNase inhibitor (Promega, N21155), 0.1 mg/mL cycloheximide (MilliporeSigma, C7698), and 1 mg/mL heparin (MilliporeSigma, H3393) using a Dounce homogenizer. Following removal of cell debris by centrifugation (18,000g, 15 minutes, 4°C), Rpl22-mRNA complexes were immunoprecipitated on ice from the cell lysate using a mouse anti-HA antibody (1 μL antibody/200 μL lysate, Covance, MMS-101R, RRID: AB_291262) and Pierce Protein A/G magnetic beads (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 88803). Anti-GAPDH antibody (Rockland Antibodies, 600–401-A33, RRID: AB_2107593) was used as a negative control for validation purposes (Figure 7B). Beads were washed 4× with ice-cold high-salt buffer (50 mM Tris, 300 mM KCl, 12 mM MgCl2, 1% NP40, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.1 mg/mL cycloheximide), and RNA was eluted with RLT buffer (Qiagen, 74034) supplemented with 10 μL/mL β-mercaptoethanol. Immunoprecipitated RNA and whole cell lysate RNA was purified using the Qiagen RNeasy Plus Micro Kit (Qiagen, 74034).

Western blot

Western blots were performed on spinal cord whole cell lysate and immunoprecipitated Rpl22 mRNA complexes from Chat-Cre;RiboTag mice, collected as described in the previous section. Protein concentrations were determined by Bradford assay, and lysates were denatured in Laemmli buffer at 95°C for 10 minutes. Samples were electrophoresed on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane using wet transfer. Membranes were incubated for 1 hour at room temperature in blocking solution (5% nonfat milk in 0.1% Tween Tris buffer), incubated overnight at 4°C in primary antibody diluted in blocking buffer, washed 4× in 0.1% Tween Tris buffer, incubated 1 hour at room temperature in peroxidase labeled secondary antibody, and washed 4× in 0.1% Tween Tris buffer. ECL reagent (Bio-Rad, 1705060) was applied to membranes before visualization on an iBright FL1500 Imaging System (Invitrogen). Primary antibodies include mouse anti-HA (1:1,000, Covance, MMS-101R, RRID: AB_291262). Secondary antibodies include Peroxidase-conjugated Affinipure donkey anti–mouse IgG (H+L), (1:1,0000, Jackson ImmunoResearch, 715-035-151, RRID: AB_2340771).

RNA-Seq

RNA-Seq was performed by GeneWiz on immunoprecipitated RNA from Chat-Cre;RiboTag mice. Following sequencing, data were trimmed for both adaptor and quality using a combination of ea-utils and Btrim (86, 87). Sequencing reads were aligned to the genome using HiSat2 (88) and counted via HTSeq (89). Quality control summary statistics were examined to identify any problematic samples (e.g., total read counts, quality and base composition profiles (± trimming), raw fastq formatted data files, aligned files (bam and text file containing sample alignment statistics), and count files (HTSeq text files). Following successful alignment, mRNA differential expression was determined and tested for significance using the Benjamini-Hochberg corrected Wald test in the R package DESeq2 (90). Failed samples were identified by visual inspection of pairs plots and removed from further analysis resulting in the following number of replicates for each sex and time point: 3-month male, 3; 3-month female, 4; 12-month male, 4; 12-month female, 5; 18-month male, 5; 18-month female, 5; and 24-month male, 5. Functional and pathway analysis was performed using IPA (QIAGEN Inc, https://www.qiagenbio-informatics.com/products/ingenuity-pathway-analysis). An Excel spreadsheet of the DEG data from this experiment is available in Ribotag MN RNAseq data in the supplemental material. The data that support the RNA-Seq findings of this study are openly available in NCBI GEO at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ (accession no. GSE226699).

RNAscope

In situ hybridization was performed on 10 μm–thick coronal spinal cord sections using the RNAscope Multiplex Fluorescence V2 system (Advanced Cell Diagnostics) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Twenty double-Z probes targeting Chat (catalog 408731) or small proline rich protein 1a (Sprr1a) (catalog 426871) mRNA were synthesized by Advanced Cell Diagnostics. Sections were deparaffinized and underwent multiple ethanol washes and peroxidase blocking steps. Sections were then incubated in antigen retrieval buffer and digested by proteinase. Sections were incubated in the double-Z probe mixture at 40°C in a hybridization oven for 2 hours. Sections were then washed, and the signal was amplified using the included amplification and HRP reagents. The sections were then imaged via confocal microscopy using identical imaging parameters across all samples. Maximum intensity projections were generated and used for analysis. We performed visual inspection of each Chat+ motor neuron in each tiled image for presence of Sprr1a signal.

qPCR

RNA collected by immunoprecipitation from Chat-Cre;RiboTag spinal cords was reverse transcribed with iScript Reverse Transcription Supermix (Bio-Rad, 1708891). cDNA was preamplified with SsoAdvanced PreAmp Supermix (Bio-Rad, 1725160), and qPCR was performed with iTAQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, 1725121) using 300 nM primers (Table 2) on a CFX Connect Real Time PCR System. Gene expression was normalized to Gapdh using the 2–ΔΔCT method.

Table 2

qPCR primers

Statistics

A 2-sided, unpaired Student’s t test, with Welch’s correction as appropriate, was used to compare 2 means. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc analysis was used to compare 3 or more means. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to compare the distribution of α-motor neuron soma areas. An n was defined as 1 animal for all experiments, except comparisons of motor neuron soma size distribution and EM, where an n was defined as 1 α-motor neuron. Analyses were performed on distinct samples in all experiments except motor neuron soma size and EM, where individual samples were analyzed repeatedly. GraphPad Prism (RRID:SCR_002798) was used for statistical analyses. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Study approval

Breeding, housing, and experimental use of mice were performed in accordance with the NIH, Virginia Tech IACUC (protocol no. 18-148 and 18-176), and Brown University IACUC (protocol no. 19-05-0013) guidelines. Monkey studies were approved by the National Institute on Aging, Intramural Research Program’s Animal Care and Use Committee. Human tissue obtained from NIH Neurobiobank was approved by the University of Pittsburgh IRB (protocol no. REN14120157/IRB981146). Written informed consent was received prior to participation.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, validation, writing of the original manuscript draft, reviewing, and editing were contributed by RWC and GV. Investigation was contributed by RWC, MCL and GV. Data curation and formal analysis were contributed by RWC and RES. Data visualization was contributed by RWC. Resources, funding acquisition, supervision, and project administration were contributed by GV.

Supplemental material

View Supplemental data

View Supplemental table 1

View Supplemental video 1

Acknowledgments

This work was funded through grants from the National Institute on Aging, awarded to RWC (F99AG068442) and GV (R01AG055545 and R56AG051501), and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, awarded to GV (R21NS106313).

Address correspondence to: Gregorio Valdez, 70 Ship St, Providence, Rhode Island 02903, USA. Phone: 401.863.5625; Email: gregorio_valdez@brown.edu.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Copyright: © 2023, Castro et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reference information: JCI Insight. 2023;8(9):e168448.https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.168448.

References
  1. Fried LP, et al. Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: implications for improved targeting and care. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59(3):255–263.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Sorond FA, et al. Aging, the central nervous system, and mobility in older adults: neural mechanisms of mobility impairment. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015;70(12):1526–1532.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Leavy B, et al. The fall descriptions and health characteristics of older adults with hip fracture: a mixed methods study. BMC Geriatr. 2015;15(1):40.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Taetzsch T, Valdez G. NMJ maintenance and repair in aging. Curr Opin Physiol. 2018;4:57–64.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Willadt S, et al. Age-related changes in the structure and function of mammalian neuromuscular junctions. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018;1412(1):41–53.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Hunter SK, et al. The aging neuromuscular system and motor performance. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2016;121(4):982–995.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Eric Kandel, Davis KJ, eds. Principles of Neural Science. McGraw-Hill; 2021.
  8. Arber S. Organization and function of neuronal circuits controlling movement. EMBO Mol Med. 2017;9(3):281–284.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Rodríguez Cruz PM, et al. The neuromuscular junction in health and disease: molecular mechanisms governing synaptic formation and homeostasis. Front Mol Neurosci. 2020;13:610964.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Wu H, et al. To build a synapse: signaling pathways in neuromuscular junction assembly. Development. 2010;137(7):1017–1033.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Arasaki K, et al. Influence of aging and the motor unit type on the inverse relationship between the refractory period and the conduction velocity of the alpha motor nerve fibers. Muscle Nerve. 1995;18(9):1019–1020.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Pousinha PA, et al. The giant miniature endplate potentials frequency is increased in aged rats. Neurosci Lett. 2015;584:224–229.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Fahim MA, Robbins N. Ultrastructural studies of young and old mouse neuromuscular junctions. J Neurocytol. 1982;11(4):641–656.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Chai RJ, et al. Striking denervation of neuromuscular junctions without lumbar motoneuron loss in geriatric mouse muscle. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28090.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Valdez G, et al. Shared resistance to aging and ALS in neuromuscular junctions of specific muscles. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):34640.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Wokke JHJ, et al. Morphological changes in the human end plate with age. J Neurol Sci. 1990;95(3):291–310.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Hashizume K, Kanda K. Differential effects of aging on motoneurons and peripheral nerves innervating the hindlimb and forelimb muscles of rats. Neurosci Res. 1995;22(2):189–196.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  18. Arizono N, et al. Morphometric analysis of human neuromuscular junction in different ages. Acta Pathol Jpn. 1984;34(6):1243–1249.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Mittal KR, Logmani FH. Age-related reduction in 8th cervical ventral nerve root myelinated fiber diameters and numbers in man. J Gerontol. 1987;42(1):8–10.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Zhang C, et al. Age-related reductions in number and size of anterior horn cells at C6 level of the human spinal cord. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn. 1996;73(4):171–177.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Piekarz KM, et al. Molecular changes associated with spinal cord aging. Geroscience. 2020;42(2):765–784.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Valdez G, et al. Attenuation of age-related changes in mouse neuromuscular synapses by caloric restriction and exercise. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(33):14863–14868.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Caccia MR, et al. Morphology and physiology of skeletal muscle in aging rodents. Muscle Nerve. 1979;2(3):202–212.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Maxwell N, et al. α-Motor neurons are spared from aging while their synaptic inputs degenerate in monkeys and mice. Aging Cell. 2018;17(2):e12726.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Gutmann E, Hanzlíková V. Motor unit in old age. Nature. 1966;209(5026):921–922.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Tomlinson BE, Irving D. The numbers of limb motor neurons in the human lumbosacral cord throughout life. J Neurol Sci. 1977;34(2):213–219.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Jacob JM. Lumbar motor neuron size and number is affected by age in male F344 rats. Mech Ageing Dev. 1998;106(1–2):205–216.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Piasecki M, et al. Age-related neuromuscular changes affecting human vastus lateralis. J Physiol. 2016;594(16):4525–4536.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  29. McNeil CJ, et al. Motor unit number estimates in the tibialis anterior muscle of young, old, and very old men. Muscle Nerve. 2005;31(4):461–467.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Terao SI, et al. Age-related changes in human spinal ventral horn cells with special reference to the loss of small neurons in the intermediate zone: a quantitative analysis. Acta Neuropathol. 1996;92(2):109–114.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  31. Kawamura Y, et al. Lumbar motoneurons of man II: the number and diameter distribution of large- and intermediate- diameter cytons in “motoneuron columns” of spinal cord of man. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1977;36(5):861–870.
    View this article via: CrossRef Google Scholar
  32. Kawamura Y, et al. Lumbar motoneurons of man: I) number and diameter histogram of alpha and gamma axons of ventral root. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1977;36(5):853–860.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  33. Cruz-Sánchez FF, et al. Synaptophysin in spinal anterior horn in aging and ALS: an immunohistological study. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 1996;103(11):1317–1329.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  34. Justice JN, et al. Battery of behavioral tests in mice that models age-associated changes in human motor function. Age (Dordr). 2014;36(2):583–592.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  35. Dukkipati SS, et al. The vulnerability of spinal motoneurons and soma size plasticity in a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Physiol. 2018;596(9):1723–1745.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Ragagnin AMG, et al. Motor neuron susceptibility in ALS/FTD. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:532:532.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  37. Rekling JC, et al. Synaptic control of motoneuronal excitability. Physiol Rev. 2000;80(2):767–852.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Heckman CJ, et al. Persistent inward currents in motoneuron dendrites: implications for motor output. Muscle Nerve. 2005;31(2):135–156.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Binder MD. Intrinsic dendritic currents make a major contribution to the control of motoneurone discharge. J Physiol. 2003;552(pt 3):665.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  40. Heckman CJ, et al. Motoneuron excitability: the importance of neuromodulatory inputs. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120(12):2040–2054.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Woo J, et al. Optimization of the optical transparency of rodent tissues by modified PACT-based passive clearing. Exp Mol Med. 2016;48(12):e274.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  42. Rotterman TM, et al. Normal distribution of VGLUT1 synapses on spinal motoneuron dendrites and their reorganization after nerve injury. J Neurosci. 2014;34(10):3475–3492.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  43. Sanz E, et al. Cell-type-specific isolation of ribosome-associated mRNA from complex tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(33):13939–13944.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  44. Arber S, et al. Requirement for the homeobox gene Hb9 in the consolidation of motor neuron identity. Neuron. 1999;23(4):659–674.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  45. Houser CR, et al. Organization and morphological characteristics of cholonergic neurons: an immunocytochemical study with a monoclonal antibody to choline acetyltransferase. Brain Res. 1983;266(1):97–119.
    View this article via: CrossRef Google Scholar
  46. Bignami A, et al. Localization of the glial fibrillary acidic protein in astrocytes by immunofluorescence. Brain Res. 1972;43(2):429–435.
    View this article via: CrossRef Google Scholar
  47. Sibille E, et al. Lack of serotonin1B receptor expression leads to age-related motor dysfunction, early onset of brain molecular aging and reduced longevity. Mol Psychiatry. 2007;12(11):1042–1056.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  48. Blum JA, et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of the adult mouse spinal cord reveals molecular diversity of autonomic and skeletal motor neurons. Nat Neurosci. 2021;24(4):572–583.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  49. Rueda-Carrasco J, et al. SFRP1 modulates astrocyte-to-microglia crosstalk in acute and chronic neuroinflammation. EMBO Rep. 2021;22(11):e51696.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  50. Li M, et al. Infusion of BDNF into the nucleus accumbens of aged rats improves cognition and structural synaptic plasticity through PI3K-ILK-Akt signaling. Behav Brain Res. 2012;231(1):146–153.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  51. McLeod F, Salinas PC. Wnt proteins as modulators of synaptic plasticity. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2018;53:90–95.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  52. Buechler J, Salinas PC. Deficient Wnt signaling and synaptic vulnerability in Alzheimer’s disease: emerging roles for the LRP6 receptor. Front Synaptic Neurosci. 2018;10:38.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  53. Gomez-Arboledas A, et al. The role of complement in synaptic pruning and neurodegeneration. Immunotargets Ther. 2021;10:373–386.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  54. Stephan AH, et al. The complement system: an unexpected role in synaptic pruning during development and disease. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2012;35:369–389.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  55. Seijffers R, et al. ATF3 expression improves motor function in the ALS mouse model by promoting motor neuron survival and retaining muscle innervation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(4):1622–1627.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  56. Bonilla IE, et al. Small proline-rich repeat protein 1A is expressed by axotomized neurons and promotes axonal outgrowth. J Neurosci. 2002;22(4):1303–1315.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  57. Mar FM, et al. Cell intrinsic control of axon regeneration. EMBO Rep. 2014;15(3):254–263.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  58. Shadrach JL, et al. Translatomic analysis of regenerating and degenerating spinal motor neurons in injury and ALS. iScience. 2021;24(7):102700.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  59. Katz HR, et al. Activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) is a highly conserved pro-regenerative transcription factor in the vertebrate nervous system. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:824036.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  60. Tiihonen J, et al. Molecular signaling pathways underlying schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2021;232:33–41.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  61. Xu P, et al. Microglial TREM-1 receptor mediates neuroinflammatory injury via interaction with SYK in experimental ischemic stroke. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(8):555.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  62. Salvany S, et al. Microglial recruitment and mechanisms involved in the disruption of afferent synaptic terminals on spinal cord motor neurons after acute peripheral nerve injury. Glia. 2021;69(5):1216–1240.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  63. Schafer DP, et al. Microglia sculpt postnatal neural circuits in an activity and complement-dependent manner. Neuron. 2012;74(4):691–705.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  64. Lui H, et al. Progranulin deficiency promotes circuit-specific synaptic pruning by microglia via complement activation. Cell. 2016;165(4):921–935.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  65. Lehrman EK, et al. CD47 protects synapses from excess microglia-mediated pruning during development. Neuron. 2018;100(1):120–134.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  66. Werneburg S, et al. Targeted complement inhibition at synapses prevents microglial synaptic engulfment and synapse loss in demyelinating disease. Immunity. 2020;52(1):167–182.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  67. Zhang C, et al. The role of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (TREM-1) in central nervous system diseases. Mol Brain. 2022;15(1):84.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  68. Lu L, et al. sTREM-1 promotes the phagocytic function of microglia to induce hippocampus damage via the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):7047.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  69. Comley LH, et al. Induction of cell stress in neurons from transgenic mice expressing yellow fluorescent protein: implications for neurodegeneration research. PLoS One. 2011;6(3):e17639.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  70. Krishnan VS, et al. Age-related loss of VGLUT1 excitatory, but not VGAT inhibitory, immunoreactive terminals on motor neurons in spinal cords of old sarcopenic male mice. Biogerontology. 2018;19(5):385–399.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  71. Hepple RT, Rice CL. Innervation and neuromuscular control in ageing skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 2016;594(8):1965–1978.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  72. Shoji H, et al. Age-related changes in behavior in C57BL/6J mice from young adulthood to middle age. Mol Brain. 2016;9(1):11.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  73. Panday SB, et al. Aging induces a step-like change in the motor ability structure of athletes. Aging (Albany NY). 2019;11(14):5276–5286.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  74. Wright VJ, Perricelli BC. Age-related rates of decline in performance among elite senior athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(3):443–450.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  75. Presumey J, et al. Complement system in neural synapse elimination in development and disease. Adv Immunol. 2017;135:53–79.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  76. Stevens B, et al. The classical complement cascade mediates CNS synapse elimination. Cell. 2007;131(6):1164–1178.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  77. Lim TKY, Ruthazer ES. Microglial trogocytosis and the complement system regulate axonal pruning in vivo. Elife. 2021;10:e62167.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  78. Tang S-J. Synaptic activity-regulated Wnt signaling in synaptic plasticity, glial function and chronic pain. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2014;13(5):737–744.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  79. Jia L, et al. Restoring Wnt/β-catenin signaling is a promising therapeutic strategy for Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Brain. 2019;12(1):104.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  80. Beaumont V, et al. Evidence for an enhancement of excitatory transmission in adult CNS by Wnt signaling pathway modulation. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2007;35(4):513–524.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  81. Rossi J, et al. Melanocortin-4 receptors expressed by cholinergic neurons regulate energy balance and glucose homeostasis. Cell Metab. 2011;13(2):195–204.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  82. Madisen L, et al. A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13(1):133–140.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  83. Fiala JC. Reconstruct: a free editor for serial section microscopy. J Microsc. 2005;218(1):52–61.
    View this article via: CrossRef Google Scholar
  84. Roossien DH, et al. Multispectral tracing in densely labeled mouse brain with nTracer. Bioinformatics. 2019;35(18):3544–3546.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  85. Taetzsch T, et al. Muscle fibers secrete FGFBP1 to slow degeneration of neuromuscular synapses during aging and progression of ALS. J Neurosci. 2017;37(1):70–82.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  86. Aronesty E. Comparison of sequencing utility programs. Open Bioinforma J. 2013;7(1):1–8.
    View this article via: CrossRef Google Scholar
  87. Kong Y. Btrim: a fast, lightweight adapter and quality trimming program for next-generation sequencing technologies. Genomics. 2011;98(2):152–153.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  88. Kim D, et al. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 andHISAT-genotype. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(8):907–915.
    View this article via: CrossRef Google Scholar
  89. Anders S, et al. HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(2):166–169.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  90. Love MI, et al. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (May 8, 2023): Electronic publication
  • Version 2 (May 18, 2023): sdt1 no longer missing

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Share this article
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts