Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Potential limitations of microdystrophin gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Cora C. Hart, Young il Lee, Jun Xie, Guangping Gao, Brian L. Lin, David W. Hammers, H. Lee Sweeney
Cora C. Hart, Young il Lee, Jun Xie, Guangping Gao, Brian L. Lin, David W. Hammers, H. Lee Sweeney
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Muscle biology Therapeutics

Potential limitations of microdystrophin gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Clinical trials delivering high doses of adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) expressing truncated dystrophin molecules (microdystrophins) are underway for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). We examined the efficiency and efficacy of this strategy with 4 microdystrophin constructs (3 in clinical trials and a variant of the largest clinical construct), in a severe mouse model of DMD, using AAV doses comparable with those in clinical trials. We achieved high levels of microdystrophin expression in striated muscles with cardiac expression approximately 10-fold higher than that observed in skeletal muscle. Significant, albeit incomplete, correction of skeletal muscle disease was observed. Surprisingly, a lethal acceleration of cardiac disease occurred with 2 of the microdystrophins. The detrimental cardiac effect appears to be caused by variable competition (dependent on microdystrophin design and expression level) between microdystrophin and utrophin at the cardiomyocyte membrane. There may also be a contribution from an overloading of protein degradation. The significance of these observations for patients currently being treated with AAV-microdystrophin therapies is unclear since the levels of expression being achieved in the DMD hearts are unknown. However, these findings suggest that microdystrophin treatments need to avoid excessively high levels of expression in the heart and that cardiac function should be carefully monitored in these patients.

Authors

Cora C. Hart, Young il Lee, Jun Xie, Guangping Gao, Brian L. Lin, David W. Hammers, H. Lee Sweeney

×

Figure 3

Microdystrophin provides partial rescue of D2.mdx skeletal muscle.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Microdystrophin provides partial rescue of D2.mdx skeletal muscle.
Male ...
Male D2.mdx mice were treated with microdystrophin (μDys) gene therapy at 1 month of age (refer to Figure 2A). (A–D) At the terminal endpoints of 12 and 18 months, ex vivo muscle function was performed for the diaphragm (A) and extensor digitorum longus muscles (EDL) (B–D) of D2.WT, untreated D2.mdx, and μDys-treated D2.mdx mice (n = 6–10). (E) Representative PSR-stained images of the gastrocnemius and diaphragm muscles with accompanying fibrosis quantifications for these groups. Scale bar: 75μm. Data were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA with Tukey HSD post hoc tests (α = 0.05) and displayed as box-and-whisker plots (A–C and E) (boxes indicate second and third quartiles, and error bars represent the minimum and maximum values) or mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 compared with WT; #P < 0.05 compared with untreated D2.mdx; %P < 0.05 compared with MDC1; $P < 0.05 compared with MDC2; &P < 0.05 compared with MDC3; @P < 0.05 compared with MDC4.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts