Research ArticleImmunologyInfectious disease Free access | 10.1172/jci.insight.159422
Department of Immunology and Microbial Disease, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dennis W. Metzger, Department of Immunology and Microbial Disease, Albany Medical College, 47 New Scotland Ave., MC-151, Albany, New York 12208, USA. Phone: 518.262.6750; Email: metzged@amc.edu.
Find articles by Barman, T. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
Department of Immunology and Microbial Disease, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dennis W. Metzger, Department of Immunology and Microbial Disease, Albany Medical College, 47 New Scotland Ave., MC-151, Albany, New York 12208, USA. Phone: 518.262.6750; Email: metzged@amc.edu.
Find articles by Singh, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Department of Immunology and Microbial Disease, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dennis W. Metzger, Department of Immunology and Microbial Disease, Albany Medical College, 47 New Scotland Ave., MC-151, Albany, New York 12208, USA. Phone: 518.262.6750; Email: metzged@amc.edu.
Find articles by Bonin, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Department of Immunology and Microbial Disease, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dennis W. Metzger, Department of Immunology and Microbial Disease, Albany Medical College, 47 New Scotland Ave., MC-151, Albany, New York 12208, USA. Phone: 518.262.6750; Email: metzged@amc.edu.
Find articles by Nafiz, T. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Department of Immunology and Microbial Disease, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dennis W. Metzger, Department of Immunology and Microbial Disease, Albany Medical College, 47 New Scotland Ave., MC-151, Albany, New York 12208, USA. Phone: 518.262.6750; Email: metzged@amc.edu.
Find articles by Salmon, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Department of Immunology and Microbial Disease, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dennis W. Metzger, Department of Immunology and Microbial Disease, Albany Medical College, 47 New Scotland Ave., MC-151, Albany, New York 12208, USA. Phone: 518.262.6750; Email: metzged@amc.edu.
Find articles by Metzger, D. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
Published April 28, 2022 - More info
Secondary infections are frequent complications of viral respiratory infections, but the potential consequence of SARS-CoV-2 coinfection with common pulmonary pathogens is poorly understood. We report that coinfection of human ACE2–transgenic mice with sublethal doses of SARS-CoV-2 and Streptococcus pneumoniae results in synergistic lung inflammation and lethality. Mortality was observed regardless of whether SARS-CoV-2 challenge occurred before or after establishment of sublethal pneumococcal infection. Increased bacterial levels following coinfection were associated with alveolar macrophage depletion, and treatment with murine GM-CSF reduced numbers of lung bacteria and pathology and partially protected from death. However, therapeutic targeting of IFNs, an approach that is effective against influenza coinfections, failed to increase survival. Combined vaccination against both SARS-CoV-2 and pneumococci resulted in 100% protection against subsequent coinfection. The results indicate that when seasonal respiratory infections return to prepandemic levels, they could lead to an increased incidence of lethal COVID-19 superinfections, especially among the unvaccinated population.
Coinfections with both pulmonary viral and bacterial pathogens often lead to synergistic lethality, but little is understood about the interplay between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and common pathogens such as Streptococcus pneumoniae (1). The frequency of SARS-CoV-2 and bacterial coinfection among hospitalized patients has been estimated to be approximately 7% (2). With the lifting of pandemic restrictions, including social isolation, masking, and frequent surface decontamination, cases of respiratory infection may return to historic prepandemic levels and lead to a heightened incidence of coinfections. When described, bacterial coinfections during COVID-19 have been described to be associated with increased risk of shock, respiratory failure, and a prolonged stay in intensive care (3). In addition, it appears that there can be increased mortality of patients with COVID-19 owing to secondary bacterial infections, despite antibiotic therapy (4, 5); this is possibly associated with cases of antibiotic resistance (6). It is therefore critical to understand the potential effect of SARS-CoV-2 coinfection with other pulmonary pathogens such as S. pneumoniae (1).
Likewise, it is important to establish measures that might ameliorate the impact of SARS-Cov-2 coinfections. Administration of GM-CSF as well as neutralization of IFNs have shown promise in murine models of influenza virus/S. pneumoniae pulmonary coinfections (7, 8). In addition, mRNA vaccines have demonstrated 90%–95% protection against human COVID-19 (9, 10). However, the efficacy of these approaches in the setting of coinfection with SARS-CoV-2 and S. pneumoniae is not known. Here, we report that coinfection of human angiotensin-converting enzyme II–transgenic (ACE2-transgenic) mice with sublethal doses of SARS-CoV-2 and S. pneumoniae results in synergistic superinfection and lethality. Treatment with GM-CSF provided moderate protection against synergistic disease, while vaccination against both SARS-CoV-2 and S. pneumoniae induced 100% protection.
Proinflammatory cytokine and innate cell levels in lungs of SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae–coinfected hACE2 mice. This study was specifically designed to investigate the consequences of SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae coinfection on morbidity and mortality, using the human ACE2 receptor–transgenic (hACE2-transgenic) mouse model (11). Briefly, mice were intranasally (i.n.) infected with a sublethal dose of SARS-CoV-2 on day 0, followed by sublethal i.n. challenge with S. pneumoniae on day 6 (Figure 1A). This coinfection procedure is similar to that typically used in mice to model human influenza virus/bacteria coinfections (12, 13) Three days after S. pneumoniae challenge, proinflammatory cytokine expression in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was measured. Mice infected with sublethal doses of either SARS-CoV-2 or S. pneumoniae alone had BALF cytokine levels that were essentially equivalent to those of naive mice (Figure 1B). However, coinfected mice expressed significantly greater cytokine levels, including very high amounts of IL-6, MIP-1α, and TNF-α. Innate immune cell infiltration into the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and lung tissues was also measured using typical gating strategies for murine pulmonary immune cells (Supplemental Figure 1, A and B; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.159422DS1). Singly infected mice showed levels of BAL and lung cells that were similar to those of naive mice. However, 3 days following coinfection with S. pneumoniae, striking increases in inflammatory cells, including monocytes, neutrophils, NK cells, and dendritic cells, were observed (Figure 1, C–J; Supplemental Figure 1, C and D; and Supplemental Figure 2, A–D). There was also a slight increase in dendritic cell numbers in mice infected with SARS-CoV-2 alone (Figure 1, I and J). Simultaneously, alveolar macrophages were depleted after SARS-CoV-2 infection (Figure 1, K and L, and Supplemental Figure 2, E and F). We also quantified CD4+ and CD8+ T cell levels but did not observe any significant differences among the groups (data not shown).
Proinflammatory cytokine and innate immune cell levels in SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae–coinfected hACE2 mice. (A) Experimental design. (B) Cytokine levels in the BALF of SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae–coinfected hACE2 mice. (C–L) Innate immune cell profiles in BAL and lung tissues from SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae–coinfected hACE2 mice: (C and D) monocytes, (E and F) neutrophils, (G and H) NK cells, (I and J) dendritic cells, and (K and L) alveolar macrophages. Data are pooled from 2 independent experiments and presented as mean ± SD. n = 3–6 mice per group per experiment; each symbol represents a single mouse. Data were analyzed by ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons post hoc test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. Spn, S. pneumoniae
Viral/bacterial loads, histopathology, and lethality in SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae–coinfected hACE2 mice. Our results showed that even mild SARS-CoV-2 infection combined with sublethal S. pneumoniae coinfection can cause a cytokine storm and major shifts in levels of innate cell levels in the lungs. We next examined pathogen loads, tissue pathology, and survival of SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae–coinfected mice (Figure 2A). In hACE2 mice infected with S. pneumoniae alone, the bacteria appeared to persist but not replicate, while, in coinfected mice, the bacterial numbers increased and were approximately 105 greater within 72 hours, compared with the original challenge dose (Figure 2B). This defect in controlling infection was consistent with the observed depletion of resident alveolar macrophages after SARS-CoV-2 challenge (Figure 1, K and L) (14, 15). Levels of replicating SARS-CoV-2 were also significantly elevated within 3 days after S. pneumoniae coinfection, as assessed by PFU formation in Vero cell cultures (Figure 2C). These increases in pathogen levels were associated with severe interstitial pneumonia, hemorrhage, epithelial desquamation, diffuse alveolar damage, and loss of normal lung tissue architecture (Figure 2D), similar to that reported for severe COVID-19 disease in mice (11). Histopathology of naive mice and mice sublethally infected with either pathogen alone appeared to be essentially normal (Figure 2D), and scoring of the tissue sections showed that pathology was significantly greater in SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae–coinfected mice compared with mice infected with either pathogen alone (Figure 2E). The pathological changes seen in coinfected animals were fully consistent with the increased expression of lung proinflammatory cytokines and innate cell populations (Figure 1).
Viral/bacterial loads, histopathology, morbidity, and mortality in SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae–coinfected hACE mice. (A) Experimental design. (B) Bacterial CFUs in lung homogenates. n = 6 mice per group. (C) Viral PFUs in lung homogenates. n = 6 mice per group. (B and C) Data were analyzed by ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons post hoc test. (D) Representative H&E staining of lung tissues in naive, S. pneumoniae-, SARS-CoV-2–, and SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae–coinfected hACE2 mice. n = 3 mice per group. Original magnification, ×20. Scale bar: 100 mm. (E) Histopathology scores. The data were analyzed by ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons post hoc test. (F–I) Morbidity and mortality following SARS-CoV-2 and S. pneumoniae coinfection. SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae coinfection (F) survival and (G) weight loss. S. pneumoniae/SARS-CoV-2 coinfection (H) survival and (I) weight loss. In each experiment n = 5 mice per group. Survival data were analyzed by the log-rank Mantel-Cox test. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. Spn, S. pneumoniae.
We next evaluated survival outcomes using two different models of SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae coinfection. It is known that the sequence of influenza virus/bacteria coinfection plays an important role in humans (16). Thus, we first used a model in which mice were infected with a relatively low dose of SARS-CoV-2 virus, followed 6 days later with a sublethal S. pneumoniae challenge, as in the above experiments. While mice infected with only SARS-CoV-2 or S. pneumoniae had minimal weight loss and 100% survival, coinfected mice lost more than 20% of their weight and all succumbed within 5 days after S. pneumoniae challenge (Figure 2, F and G). Because S. pneumoniae is typically a human commensal restricted to the upper respiratory tract, in further experiments we colonized mice with S. pneumoniae on day 0, followed by SARS-Cov-2 challenge on day 2, similar to our previous work with murine S. pneumoniae/influenza virus coinfection (7). S. pneumoniae/SARS-CoV-2 coinfection using this challenge schedule led to minimal weight loss but still induced 60% mortality; again, singly infected mice all survived (Figure 2, H and I).
Treatment with GM-CSF for SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae coinfection. The beneficial effects of GM-CSF in animal models of bacterial and viral lung infections, including influenza virus/S. pneumoniae coinfections, have been reported by several investigators (8, 17–23). For SARS-CoV-2 infection, clinical trials of GM-CSF therapy are ongoing (23). Because our results showed that SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae coinfection led to depletion of alveolar macrophages and subsequent outgrowth of pneumococcus, we hypothesized that GM-CSF treatment might stabilize alveolar macrophage expression and protect against SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae infection by enhancing pathogen clearance and/or tissue repair mechanisms. Treatment with GM-CSF during SARS-CoV-2 infection but before challenge with S. pneumoniae led to decreased BALF cytokine levels compared with PBS-treated coinfected mice (Figure 3A). Levels of inflammatory cell populations, including monocytes, neutrophils, NK cells, and dendritic cells, were also decreased in GM-CSF–treated coinfected mice as compared with the control PBS-treated group (Figure 3, B–I). However, levels of alveolar macrophages in both in BAL and lung tissue were increased following GM-CSF treatment (Figure 3, J and K). Consistent with enhanced expression of alveolar macrophages, bacterial cell counts were significantly decreased in lung tissues of GM-CSF–treated mice (Figure 3L). In addition, in some but not all mice, viral PFU levels were reduced (Figure 3M ). Histopathology analysis indicated that inflammatory infiltrates and interstitial pneumonia were mild to moderate in GM-CSF–treated mice compared with the severe pathology seen in PBS-treated coinfected mice (Figure 3N). Finally, although all mice initially lost weight, mortality was slightly delayed in GM-CSF–treated mice, and 25% of the mice survived coinfection, while all coinfected mice treated with PBS died by day 11 (Figure 3, O and P).
Treatment with GM-CSF for SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniaecoinfection. (A) Cytokine levels in the BALF of SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae–coinfected hACE2 mice treated with PBS or GM-CSF. (B–K) Innate immune cell profiles in BAL and lung tissues from SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae–coinfected hACE2 mice treated with PBS or GM-CSF: (B and C) monocytes, (D and E) neutrophils, (F and G) NK cells, (H and I) dendritic cells, and (J and K) alveolar macrophages. (L) Bacterial CFU and (M) viral PFU in lung homogenates following PBS or GM-CSF treatment. n = 4 mice per group. (N) Representative H&E staining of lung tissues from SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae–coinfected hACE2 mice with PBS and GM-CSF treatment. n = 3 mice per group. Original magnification, ×20. Scale bar: 100 mm. (O) Survival and (P) weight loss in SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae–coinfected mice following PBS or GM-CSF treatment. n = 7–8 mice per group. Survival data were analyzed by the log-rank Mantel-Cox test. All other data were analyzed by ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons post hoc test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001. Spn, S. pneumoniae.
Therapeutic neutralization of IFN-αβR, IFN-γ, and TNF-α, in SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae coinfected hACE2 mice. It is known that neutralization of type I and II IFN signaling can significantly increase survival following influenza virus/S. pneumoniae coinfection (7). Previous studies in hACE2-transgenic mice have also reported that neutralization of IFN-γ when combined with anti–TNF-α mAb treatment can rescue mice from pathology after infection with SARS-CoV-2 alone (24). We therefore tested the protective efficacy of various combinations of these neutralizing mAbs in models of both SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae and S. pneumoniae/SARS-CoV-2 coinfection, using the same conditions for cytokine neutralization as in previous studies (24). However, we observed no effects on morbidity or mortality (Figure 4). A single mouse in the anti–IFN-γ/TNF-α–treated group survived, but this was likely stochastic, as all other mice in this group died within the same time frame as the IgG isotype control group (as well as in all of the other mAb-treated groups, including mice triply treated with anti–IFN-αβR/IFN-γ/TNF-α). We conclude that neutralization of these proinflammatory cytokines is unlikely to prevent lethal synergy that might be seen during SARS-CoV-2 coinfections.
Therapeutic neutralization of IFN-αβR, IFN-γ, and TNF-α in SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae–coinfected hACE2 mice. (A and B) Survival and weight change after combined anti–IFN-αβR, anti–IFN-γ, and anti–TNF-α mAb treatment during SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae coinfection. n = 6–7 mice per group. (C and D) Combined anti–IFN-αβR and anti–IFN-γ mAb treatment during S. pneumoniae/SARS-CoV-2 coinfection. n = 9–10 mice per group. Survival data were analyzed by the log-rank Mantel-Cox test. Spn, S. pneumoniae.
Efficacy of vaccination for protection against SARS-CoV-2/ S. pneumoniae coinfection. To assess the protective value of vaccination, individual groups of mice were immunized against either S. pneumoniae or SARS-CoV-2 and then infected after 28 days with SARS-CoV-2, followed 6 days later with S. pneumoniae (Figure 5A). In all cases, serum antibodies reached levels 21 days after vaccination that were sufficient for protection against the relevant single pathogen (minimum 50% serum antibody titer of >200) (25, 26) (Figure 5, B and C). For SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae coinfection, we found that vaccination with the Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 vaccine provided approximately 50% protection (Figure 5, D and E). A similar level of protection was seen after vaccination with the Prevnar13 S. pneumoniae vaccine (Figure 5, D and E). However, dual vaccination with both Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and Prevnar13 S. pneumoniae vaccine resulted in 100% survival against SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae coinfection (Figure 5, D and E).
Efficacy of vaccination for protection against SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniaecoinfection. (A) Experimental design. (B) Anti-spike serum antibody titers induced by the Pfizer-BioNtech COVID-19 vaccine, and (C) anti-pneumococcal polysaccharide serotype 3 serum antibody titers induced by the Pfizer Prevnar13 vaccine. Serum antibody titers from individual mice were determined by ELISA using 50% maximal binding as the titer endpoint. n = 11–22 mice per group pooled from 2 independent experiments. Protection in terms of (D) survival and (E) weight loss of hACE2 mice following SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae coinfection by Prevnar13 pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, Pfizer mRNA vaccine, or dual Prevnar13 and Pfizer mRNA vaccines. n = 5–8 mice per group per experiment; data pooled from 2 independent experiments. Statistical analyses for survival were performed by the log-rank Mantel-Cox test. *P < 0.05, ****P < 0.0001. Spn, S. pneumoniae. DPI, days post immunization.
Correlates of vaccine efficacy for protection against SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae coinfection. We next examined potential correlates of protection in vaccinated mice. During SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae coinfection of naive mice, the most striking features associated with lethality were cytokine storm and increased infiltration of monocytes, neutrophils, NK cells, and dendritic cells, in conjunction with a marked decrease in numbers of alveolar macrophages (Figure 1). After challenge of vaccinated hACE2 mice with SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae, several proinflammatory cytokines that were highly expressed in unvaccinated coinfected mice were significantly reduced, and infiltration of monocytes, neutrophils, NK cells, and dendritic cells was likewise reduced (Figure 6, A–I). Concurrently, levels of alveolar macrophages were increased in challenged, vaccinated mice (Figure 6, J and K). The maximum increase in alveolar macrophages was seen in mRNA COVID-19–vaccinated mice. Both viral and bacterial pulmonary loads were significantly decreased in vaccinated mice compared with unvaccinated coinfected controls (Figure 6, L and M). The presence of histopathological lesions (Figure 6N) was consistent with our immune function findings — unvaccinated SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae–coinfected mice exhibited severe tissue pathology on day 9 compared with mice previously vaccinated with the Pfizer mRNA vaccine or Prevnar13. In the vaccinated mice, the lesions were mild (Figure 6N).
Correlates of vaccine efficacy against SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniaecoinfection in hACE2 mice. (A) Cytokine levels in the BALF of SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae–coinfected hACE2 mice. (B–K) Innate immune cell profiles in BAL and lung tissues from SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae–coinfected hACE2 mice: (B and C) monocytes, (D and E) neutrophils, (F and G) NK cells, (H and I) dendritic cells, and (J and K) alveolar macrophages. n = 4 mice per group per experiment; each symbol represents a single mouse. (L) Viral PFU in lung homogenates. n = 4 mice per group. (M) Bacterial CFU in lung homogenates. n = 4 mice per group. (N) Representative H&E staining of lung tissues from PBS-SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae, Pfizer-SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae, and Prevnar13-SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae–immunized coinfected hACE2 mice. n = 3 mice per group. Original magnification, ×20. Scale bar: 100 mm. Data were analyzed by ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons post hoc test. Data are representative of 2 independent experiments and are presented as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. Spn, S. pneumoniae.
Our results demonstrated that coinfection of hACE2 mice with sublethal doses of SARS-CoV-2 and S. pneumoniae resulted in severe inflammation and lethality, while challenge with the same doses of SARS-CoV-2 or S. pneumoniae alone did not induce disease. Severe disease induced with SARS-CoV-2 can result in dysregulated inflammation and cytokine storm (27–31), and our results now show for the first time to our knowledge that cytokine storm can also be induced by mild SARS-CoV-2 infection when combined with S. pneumoniae superinfection. Coinfection was associated with infiltration of inflammatory cells into the lung and depletion of resident alveolar macrophages. While neutralization of IFN and TNF-α signaling failed to provide protection, GM-CSF treatment did decrease pathology and allowed some mice to survive coinfection. In addition, dual vaccination against both SARS-CoV-2 and S. pneumoniae led to a protective efficacy of 100%.
In our study, levels of monocytes, neutrophils, NK cells, and dendritic cells were particularly increased in coinfected mice compared with singly infected mice. However, alveolar macrophage levels were decreased. During SARS-CoV-2 infection, the majority of macrophages present in the lung are believed to arise from infiltrating monocytes (32, 33). However, in spite of a dramatic increase in monocytes, the levels of alveolar macrophages in our study did not increase proportionately. The cause and mechanisms of alveolar macrophage depletion need further investigation but based on studies in other coinfection models, it is likely to be due to activation-induced cell death. In coinfected mice, we also observed in BALF and lung tissue large numbers of neutrophils, cells that are thought to play roles in pathology during COVID-19 (34) through production of several inflammatory cytokines (35) leading to tissue damage (36). We likewise observed increased numbers of NK cells during SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae coinfection. While NK cells are believed to control SARS-CoV-2 infection and decreased numbers of NK cells correlate with disease severity and mortality of patients with COVID-19 (37), their role during coinfection is not known. Finally, our results showed that the number of dendritic cells was also increased in BALF and lung tissues of coinfected mice. Dendritic cells are targets of SARS-CoV-2 infection and involved in innate and adaptive immunity (38), but their functional capabilities in superinfections have yet to be fully explored.
Both bacterial and viral loads were significantly increased during SARS CoV-2/S. pneumoniae coinfection. We hypothesize that the overgrowth of S. pneumoniae was fueled by the decreased numbers of phagocytic alveolar macrophages, which, in turn, led to inflammatory cell infiltration, proinflammatory cytokine expression, and, ultimately, lethal tissue damage. Reduction in alveolar macrophage numbers following pulmonary influenza virus infection of mice has been previously reported (39, 40) in addition to changes in alveolar macrophage phenotype (12, 41). The resulting lung tissue lesions in coinfected mice were characterized by severe interstitial pneumonia with inflammatory cell infiltration, hemorrhages, epithelial desquamation, diffuse alveolar damage, and loss of lung tissue architecture, as also seen in lethal COVID-19 of mice (11, 42) and humans (1).
All mice in our study that were initially infected with SARS-CoV-2 and then challenged 6 days later with S. pneumoniae succumbed by day 11. We determined whether reversing the sequence of coinfection — precolonization of mice with S. pneumoniae followed by SARS-CoV-2 infection, a situation most relevant to human infection, especially in children — would similarly lead to high levels of lethality. In this case, we reproducibly observed 60% mortality. It is worth noting that, in human influenza virus/S. pneumoniae coinfection, the sequence of pathogen exposure appears to play a critical role in disease progression (16).
SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae coinfection induced synergistic lethality that was associated with depletion of macrophages and subsequent overgrowth of pneumococci. Therapeutic administration of GM-CSF before bacterial coinfection enhanced alveolar macrophage levels and resulted in decreased numbers of pneumococci in the lungs. This, in turn, lead to decreased inflammatory cytokine expression in the lung and a moderate survival advantage. GM-CSF, an important pleiotropic cytokine and growth factor, plays a vital role in alveolar macrophage homeostasis, lung inflammation, and immunological disease. GM-CSF is known to serve a key role in normal physiology of lung health and can be important for host defense. GM-CSF acts locally on inflamed lung tissues to enhance growth, survival, and proliferation of alveolar macrophages. The beneficial effects of GM-CSF in animal models of bacterial and viral lung infection have been reported by many investigators (8, 17–22). For SARS-CoV-2 infection, clinical trials of GM-CSF therapy are ongoing (23), and further studies in animals could determine whether protocols for GM-CSF treatment optimization could provide improved levels of protection.
We further investigated the efficacy of therapeutic and prophylactic mAb cytokine neutralization for prevention of lethal SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae superinfection. We have previously shown that neutralization of respiratory IFN-αβ and IFN-γ signaling protects mice colonized with S. pneumoniae from subsequent influenza virus coinfection. The detrimental roles of IFN-αβ and IFN-γ have also been described in mice infected first with influenza virus followed by S. pneumoniae challenge (12, 43, 44). In addition, others have reported that lung cytokine neutralization could rescue hACE2 mice from lethal SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly from tissue damage caused by the induction of IFN-γ and TNF-α expression (24). However, in our infection models, including either SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae coinfection or S. pneumoniae/SARS-CoV-2 coinfection, neutralization of IFN-γ and TNF-α, neutralization of IFN-αβ and TNF-α, or neutralization of all 3 cytokine pathways failed in each case to alter survival rates. We considered also testing the efficacy of IL-1 and IL-6 neutralization. Recent findings have supported the use of anti-IL-1/IL-1R and anti-IL-6 mAbs in patients with severe COVID-19 (45–47), and these treatments have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for emergency usage in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 with systemic inflammation. Testing the potential of neutralizing these cytokine pathways in combination with GM-CSF administration for prevention of lethality during SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae coinfection would be of interest. Neutralization of proinflammatory cytokine pathways could be helpful in the prevention of lethal tissue damage observed during superinfection.
SARS-CoV-2 and S. pneumoniae vaccines are highly effective in both humans and mice for protection against COVID-19 and pneumococcal infection, respectively (26, 48). However, their possible efficacy against lethal coinfection is not known. Thus, we immunized mice with the Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 vaccine or the pneumococcal Prevnar13 vaccine, followed 3 weeks later with a homologous booster vaccine dose and then 1 week later with SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae coinfection. This vaccination protocol induced robust antibody production against SARS-CoV-2 and pneumococcal polysaccharide but only provided approximately 50% protection against SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae superinfection. Previous studies in humans (49) and mice (26) similarly demonstrated that vaccination with Prevnar alone provides approximately 50% protection against influenza virus/S. pneumoniae coinfection. However, dual vaccination against both SARS-CoV-2 and pneumococcus induced 100% survival in mice following coinfection. Vaccination correlated with decreased inflammatory cell and cytokine expression, reversal of alveolar macrophage depletion, decreased viral and bacterial loads, and reduced lung pathology.
Coinfection with influenza virus and SARS-CoV-2 might also result in synergistic lethality. It appears that coinfections with influenza virus are currently not a significant clinical problem, although measures to restrict COVID-19 have resulted in very low levels of seasonal influenza for the past 2 years. Considering this, in other studies, we also examined potential synergy between SARS-CoV-2 and influenza virus in the hACE2-transgenic mouse model. Like superinfection with SARS-CoV-2 and S. pneumoniae, we observed significant lethality after coinfection with sublethal challenge doses of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza virus given on days 0 and 6, regardless of the sequence of coinfection (unpublished observations). In future studies, it will be of interest to investigate the ability of GM-CSF or vaccination to protect against SARS-CoV-2/influenza virus coinfection.
In summary, we have shown that hACE2-transgenic mice coinfected with SARS-CoV-2 and S. pneumoniae become highly susceptible to lethal pathogenesis compared with mice infected with low doses of either pathogen alone. Treatment with GM-CSF provided some benefit from pathology, while vaccination against both COVID-19 and S. pneumoniae resulted in 100% protection from SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae coinfection. As pandemic-related restrictions are lifted and increases in common respiratory infections become more likely, SARS-CoV-2/S. pneumoniae superinfections may represent a significant new threat to human health. Our study further argues in favor of widespread COVID-19 and pneumococcal vaccination in the human population to prevent SARS-CoV-2–associated bacterial superinfections.
Mice. Male and female hACE2 receptor–transgenic mice (K18-hACE2 mice) were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory, bred in the Albany Medical College Animal Resource Facility, and used at 6–8 weeks of age. Infected animals were housed in individually ventilated cages within the Albany Medical College ABSL-3 facility.
Bacterial and viral strains. SARS-CoV-2 virus (Coronavirus strain 2019-nCoV/USA-WA1/2020, no. NR-52281; BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH) was grown and titrated on Vero E6 cell monolayers using standard procedures (50). In brief, exponentially growing Vero E6 cells were washed with sterile PBS and infected with SARS-CoV-2 virus at an MOI of 0.01 for 1 hour at 37°C in 5% CO2. After 3 days, the virus particles were concentrated and purified using the Abcam PEG virus precipitation kit. A final virus stock was prepared in sterile PBS and stored at –80°C until use. Frozen stocks of S. pneumoniae A66.1 strain serotype 3 were used for bacterial infection.
Coinfection of hACE2 mice. Mice were anesthetized with a mixture of 20% ketamine (100 mg/mL), 5% xylazine (20 mg/mL), and 75% PBS and infected i.n. using an inoculation volume of 40 μL. For coinfection, the initial challenge was given on day 0, and secondary infection was given on day 6, except for S. pneumoniae colonization experiments, in which S. pneumoniae was inoculated i.n. into lightly anesthetized mice in a volume of 20 μL, and secondary SARS-CoV-2 infection was performed on day 2. Mice were infected with 103 PFU of SARS-CoV-2 and 103 CFU of S. pneumoniae in sterile PBS. Control groups of mice received equal volumes of PBS. Each mouse was weighed daily and observed for clinical signs.
BAL and lung tissues were collected from infected mice on day 7 and day 9 after infection. For the collection of BALF, mice were euthanized, a small incision was made on the trachea, and the lungs were lavaged 3 times with 1 mL cold sterile PBS using an 18-gauge BD tubing adapter. The BALF was spun at 500g for 5 minutes at 4°C and stored at –80°C until analysis.
Cytokine analysis. BAL samples were collected on days 7 and 9 from naive mice, mice infected with S. pneumoniae only or SARS-CoV-2 only, and coinfected mice. Cytokines in BALF were analyzed by a 23-plex Luminex multiplex bead-based assay (Bio-Rad) following the manufacturer’s recommendations.
Flow cytometry analysis. Cell populations were assessed in BAL and lungs. Lung tissues were cut into small pieces and digested with Liberase TL (1 mg/mL; Roche) and DNase I (10 mg/mL; MilliporeSigma) for 30 minutes at 37°C with gentle agitation. Single-cell suspensions were obtained by passage through a 70 μm mesh. This was followed by treatment with FcγRII/III block (2.4G2 mAb) for 15 minutes and staining with fluorescent mAbs and Fixable Viability Dye (eFluor 780; eBioscience) to differentiate live and dead cells. Antibodies used were anti-CD11b (clone M1/70, PERcpcy5.5, BD Biosciences), anti-CD11c (clone N418, Pac Blue, BioLegend), anti–Siglec-F (clone E50-2440, PE, BD Biosciences), anti–MHC class II (clone M5/114.15.2, Pac Orange, BioLegend), anti-F4/80 (Clone BM8, Pac Blue, Invitrogen), anti-Ly6C (clone HK 1.4, APC, eBioscience), anti-Ly6G (clone 1A8, FITC, BD Biosciences), anti-CD3 (clone 17A2, APC, BioLegend), anti-CD4 (clone GK 1.5, FITC, BioLegend), anti-CD8 (clone 53–6.7, PE, BD Biosciences), and anti-Dx5 (clone DX5, Pac Blue, BioLegend). Stained cells were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde before removal from the BSL-3 facility and analysis was performed on a BD FACS Canto using FACSDiva software. The data were analyzed using FlowJo, version 10.
Bacterial and viral loads. Bacterial loads in lung homogenates of infected mice were determined as described previously (51). Briefly, lung homogenates were prepared in PBS and serial dilutions plated on blood agar plates, which were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2. Bacterial colonies were enumerated 18–20 hours later. Quantification of replicating SARS-CoV-2 virion levels in lung samples was performed as described previously (50). Briefly, Vero E6 cell monolayers were washed with PBS and infected with cell-free lung homogenates for 1 hour at 37°C. The infected cell monolayers were then overlaid with DMEM supplemented with 2% FBS, penicillin/streptomycin, and 1% methylcellulose and incubated for 4 days to allow development of cytopathic effects. The cells were fixed with 10% formalin for 1 hour followed by staining with 1% crystal violet and counting of PFU under ×10 magnification.
Histopathology. Lung samples were collected and fixed in 10% formalin. 5 μm tissue sections were prepared and stained with H&E. Ten fields from each lung section were randomly chosen for analysis using an Olympus BX41 microscope (52). Images were obtained under ×20 magnification using CellSense software. Histology scoring was performed as described previously (52, 53).
In vivo GM-CSF treatment. Murine GM-CSF (Miltenyi Biotec) was administered i.n. at a dose of 10 μg/mouse in PBS to lightly anesthetized mice. Treatment was given 1 day before SARS-CoV-2 infection and then further treatments were continued on days 1, 3, 5, and 7.
In vivo cytokine neutralization. Murine IFN-αβ, IFN-γ, and TNF-α were neutralized by intraperitoneal inoculation of 500 μg/mouse MAR1-5A3 anti–IFN-αβR mAb (BioXCell), 600 μg/mouse XMG1.2 anti–IFN-γ mAb (BioXCell), and 500 μg/mouse TN3-19.12 anti–TNF-α mAb (Leinco Technologies Inc.) in 200 μL PBS. Control mice received equal amounts of irrelevant isotype-matched mAbs. The mAbs were administered on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 after infection. All treatments were given in a double-blind manner, using antibody preparations coded by an independent investigator. Mortality and weight loss were recorded daily until day 20.
Immunization. Groups of mice were vaccinated intramuscularly with 3 μg Pfizer mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and/or 2.86 μg Prevnar13 S. pneumoniae polysaccharide conjugate vaccine (Pfizer). Unvaccinated control mice received PBS. Serum antibody titers were determined by ELISA using Maxisorp 96-well microplates (Thermo Fisher Scientific) coated with 100 ng/well SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein S1+S2 (BioLegend, 793706) or 200 ng/well purified pneumococcal polysaccharide serotype 3 (US Type 3; ATCC) overnight at 4°C. The remaining ELISA procedures were performed as described previously (54). Antibody titers were determined by calculating the 50% maximal OD405nm values for each ELISA.
Correlates of protection in vaccinated mice. To assess the correlates of protection, mice were immunized against S. pneumoniae or SARS-CoV-2 and infected with SARS-CoV-2; then 6 days later, mice were challenged with S. pneumoniae. Three days following coinfection, cytokine levels, cell expression, bacterial/viral loads, and histopathology were assessed.
Statistics. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 9.0. Comparisons of cytokine expression as well as cell population levels between multiple groups were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. P values of less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
Study approval. All animal studies were approved by the Albany Medical College Institutional Animal Use and Care Committee (protocol no. 20-04001) and were conducted according to the regulations for animal experiments at Albany Medical College.
TKB and DWM conceived the ideas, designed the experiments, and wrote the manuscript. TKB, AKS, JLB, TNN, and SLS performed experiments and analysis. DWM acquired funding and provided supervision.
Technical assistance for cytokine analyses and histopathology was provided by the Albany Medical College Immunology Core, within the Department of Immunology and Microbial Disease. This research was supported by the NIH grant R01 HL140496-01 (to DWM).
Address correspondence to: Dennis W. Metzger, Department of Immunology and Microbial Disease, Albany Medical College, 47 New Scotland Ave., MC-151, Albany, New York 12208, USA. Phone: 518.262.6750; Email: metzged@amc.edu.
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Copyright: © 2022, Barman et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Reference information: JCI Insight. 2022;7(11):e159422.https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.159422.