Submit a comment
Abstract
Insulin resistance impairs benefits of lipid-lowering treatment, as evidenced by higher cardiovascular disease risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes versus those without. Because platelet activity is higher in insulin-resistant patients and promotes atherosclerosis progression, we questioned whether platelets impair inflammation resolution in plaques during lipid lowering. In mice with obesity and insulin resistance, we induced advanced plaques and then implemented lipid lowering to promote atherosclerotic plaque inflammation resolution. Concurrently, mice were treated with either platelet-depleting or control antibodies for 3 weeks. Platelet activation and insulin resistance were unaffected by lipid lowering. Both antibody-treated groups showed reduced plaque macrophages, but plaque cellular and structural composition differed. In platelet-depleted mice, single-cell RNA-seq revealed dampened inflammatory gene expression in plaque macrophages and an expansion of a subset of Fcgr4+ macrophages having features of inflammation-resolving, phagocytic cells. Necrotic core size was smaller and collagen content greater, resembling stable human plaques. Consistent with the mouse results, clinical data showed that patients with lower platelet counts had decreased proinflammatory signaling pathways in circulating nonclassical monocytes after lipid lowering. These findings highlight that platelets hinder inflammation resolution in atherosclerosis during lipid-lowering treatment. Identifying novel platelet-targeted therapies following lipid-lowering treatment in individuals with insulin resistance may be a promising therapeutic approach to promote atherosclerotic plaque inflammation resolution.
Authors
Maria Laskou, Sofie Delbare, Michael Gildea, Ada Weinstock, Vitor De Moura Virginio, Maxwell La Forest, Franziska Krautter, Casey Donahoe, Letizia Amadori, Natalia Eberhardt, Tessa J. Barrett, Chiara Giannarelli, Jeffrey S. Berger, Edward A. Fisher
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
