Submit a comment
Abstract
Modic type 1 and 2 changes (MC-1 and MC-2) are highly prevalent in individuals with chronic low back pain, yet the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying vertebral endplate degeneration remain poorly defined. Here, we report that osteoclastogenesis is markedly elevated in MC-1 and MC-2 lesions compared with MC-3 lesions, suggesting an active role for osteoclasts in the early stages of degeneration. Using a lumbar spine instability (LSI) mouse model, we demonstrate enhanced osteoclast activity in degenerating endplates. RNA sequencing of mononuclear cells isolated from the endplate and adjacent subchondral bone identified Gdf15 as a potential upstream regulator of this process. Conditional knockout of Gdf15 in monocytes reduced osteoclast formation, aberrant CD31hiEmcnhi angiogenesis, and pain-associated neurogenesis, ultimately mitigating endplate degeneration and mechanical allodynia. Mechanistically, GDF15 promoted the fusion of preosteoclasts by modulating the expression of Rho family small GTPases. In a humanized GDF15 knockin mouse model, therapeutic neutralization of GDF15 led to a reduction in osteoclast burden, improved endplate structure, and attenuated pain behavior. Together, these findings uncover a previously unrecognized role for GDF15 in driving osteoclast-mediated endplate degeneration and highlight its potential as a therapeutic target for the treatment of endplate-related chronic low back pain.
Authors
Xiaoqun Li, Jinhui Wu, Qingjie Kong, Miao Hu, Yuhong Li, Ziheng Wei, Heng Jiang, Xuhui Zhou, Jun Ma
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
