Submit a comment
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2023;8(3):e165369. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.165369.
Abstract
Patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) have increased expression of liver monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), but its cellular source and contribution to various aspects of NASH pathophysiology remain debated. We demonstrated increased liver CCL2 (which encodes MCP-1) expression in patients with NASH, and commensurately, a 100-fold increase in hepatocyte Ccl2 expression in a mouse model of NASH, accompanied by increased liver monocyte-derived macrophage (MoMF) infiltrate and liver fibrosis. To test repercussions of increased hepatocyte-derived MCP-1, we generated hepatocyte-specific Ccl2-knockout mice, which showed reduced liver MoMF infiltrate as well as decreased liver fibrosis. Forced hepatocyte MCP-1 expression provoked the opposite phenotype in chow-fed wild-type mice. Consistent with increased hepatocyte Notch signaling in NASH, we observed a close correlation between markers of Notch activation and CCL2 expression in patients with NASH. We found that an evolutionarily conserved Notch/recombination signal binding protein for immunoglobulin kappa J region binding site in the Ccl2 promoter mediated transactivation of the Ccl2 promoter in NASH diet–fed mice. Increased liver MoMF infiltrate and liver fibrosis seen in opposite gain-of-function mice was ameliorated with concomitant hepatocyte Ccl2 knockout or CCR2 inhibitor treatment. Hepatocyte Notch activation prompts MCP-1–dependent increase in liver MoMF infiltration and fibrosis.
Authors
Jinku Kang, Jorge Postigo-Fernandez, KyeongJin Kim, Changyu Zhu, Junjie Yu, Marica Meroni, Brent Mayfield, Alberto Bartolomé, Dianne H. Dapito, Anthony W. Ferrante Jr., Paola Dongiovanni, Luca Valenti, Remi J. Creusot, Utpal B. Pajvani
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
