Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease characterized by CNS inflammation leading to demyelination and axonal damage. IFN-β is an established treatment for MS; however, up to 30% of IFN-β–treated MS patients develop neutralizing antidrug antibodies (nADA), leading to reduced drug bioactivity and efficacy. Mechanisms driving antidrug immunogenicity remain uncertain, and reliable biomarkers to predict immunogenicity development are lacking. Using high-throughput flow cytometry, NOTCH2 expression on CD14+ monocytes and increased frequency of proinflammatory monocyte subsets were identified as baseline predictors of nADA development in MS patients treated with IFN-β. The association of this monocyte profile with nADA development was validated in 2 independent cross-sectional MS patient cohorts and a prospective cohort followed before and after IFN-β administration. Reduced monocyte NOTCH2 expression in nADA+ MS patients was associated with NOTCH2 activation measured by increased expression of Notch-responsive genes, polarization of monocytes toward a nonclassical phenotype, and increased proinflammatory IL-6 production. NOTCH2 activation was T cell dependent and was only triggered in the presence of serum from nADA+ patients. Thus, nADA development was driven by a proinflammatory environment that triggered activation of the NOTCH2 signaling pathway prior to first IFN-β administration.
Marsilio Adriani, Petra Nytrova, Cyprien Mbogning, Signe Hässler, Karel Medek, Poul Erik H. Jensen, Paul Creeke, Clemens Warnke, Kathleen Ingenhoven, Bernhard Hemmer, Claudia Sievers, Raija L.P. Lindberg Gasser, Nicolas Fissolo, Florian Deisenhammer, Zsolt Bocskei, Vincent Mikol, Anna Fogdell-Hahn, Eva Kubala Havrdova, Philippe Broët, Pierre Dönnes, Claudia Mauri, Elizabeth C. Jury, The ABIRISK Consortium
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 234 | 69 |
50 | 27 | |
Figure | 111 | 6 |
Table | 45 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 13 | 1 |
Citation downloads | 52 | 0 |
Totals | 505 | 103 |
Total Views | 608 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.