Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising/recruitment
  • Contact
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Concise Communication
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising/recruitment
  • Contact
Sclerostin neutralization unleashes the osteoanabolic effects of Dkk1 inhibition
Phillip C. Witcher, … , Gabriela G. Loots, Alexander G. Robling
Phillip C. Witcher, … , Gabriela G. Loots, Alexander G. Robling
Published June 7, 2018
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2018;3(11):e98673. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.98673.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Bone biology Therapeutics

Sclerostin neutralization unleashes the osteoanabolic effects of Dkk1 inhibition

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The WNT pathway has become an attractive target for skeletal therapies. High-bone-mass phenotypes in patients with loss-of-function mutations in the LRP5/6 inhibitor Sost (sclerosteosis), or in its downstream enhancer region (van Buchem disease), highlight the utility of targeting Sost/sclerostin to improve bone properties. Sclerostin-neutralizing antibody is highly osteoanabolic in animal models and in human clinical trials, but antibody-based inhibition of another potent LRP5/6 antagonist, Dkk1, is largely inefficacious for building bone in the unperturbed adult skeleton. Here, we show that conditional deletion of Dkk1 from bone also has negligible effects on bone mass. Dkk1 inhibition increases Sost expression, suggesting a potential compensatory mechanism that might explain why Dkk1 suppression lacks anabolic action. To test this concept, we deleted Sost from osteocytes in, or administered sclerostin neutralizing antibody to, mice with a Dkk1-deficient skeleton. A robust anabolic response to Dkk1 deletion was manifest only when Sost/sclerostin was impaired. Whole-body DXA scans, μCT measurements of the femur and spine, histomorphometric measures of femoral bone formation rates, and biomechanical properties of whole bones confirmed the anabolic potential of Dkk1 inhibition in the absence of sclerostin. Further, combined administration of sclerostin and Dkk1 antibody in WT mice produced a synergistic effect on bone gain that greatly exceeded individual or additive effects of the therapies, confirming the therapeutic potential of inhibiting multiple WNT antagonists for skeletal health. In conclusion, the osteoanabolic effects of Dkk1 inhibition can be realized if sclerostin upregulation is prevented. Anabolic therapies for patients with low bone mass might benefit from a strategy that accounts for the compensatory milieu of WNT inhibitors in bone tissue.

Authors

Phillip C. Witcher, Sara E. Miner, Daniel J. Horan, Whitney A. Bullock, Kyung-Eun Lim, Kyung Shin Kang, Alison L. Adaniya, Ryan D. Ross, Gabriela G. Loots, Alexander G. Robling

×

Figure 3

Conditional deletion of Dkk1 from bone consistently increases bone mineral content when Sost is co-deleted in the same bone cell population.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Conditional deletion of Dkk1 from bone consistently increases bone miner...
Serial in vivo DXA scans of WT (Dkk1+/+ Sost+/+), Dkk1-flox (Dkk1fl/fl Sost+/+), Sost-flox (Dkk1+/+ Sostfl/fl), and compound flox (Dkk1fl/fl Sostfl/fl) mice, collected every 2–3 weeks and analyzed for (A and B) whole-body BMC, (C and D) lumbar spine BMC, and (E and F) BMC of the right hindlimb distal to the acetabulum. Data in A, C, and E show data from Cre-negative mice only; data in B, D, and F show data from Cre-positive mice only. Results in all panels are based on data from female mice; corresponding data from male mice are provided in the supplemental material. *P < 0.05 compared with WT mice; †P < 0.05 compared with Dkk1fl/fl mice; ‡P < 0.05 compared with Sostfl/fl mice. For all curves, n = 6–14 mice/group. All panels were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA followed by Fisher’s protected LSD post hoc tests.

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts