Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
αvβ3 Integrin drives fibroblast contraction and strain stiffening of soft provisional matrix during progressive fibrosis
Vincent F. Fiore, … , James S. Hagood, Thomas H. Barker
Vincent F. Fiore, … , James S. Hagood, Thomas H. Barker
Published October 18, 2018
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2018;3(20):e97597. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.97597.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cell biology Pulmonology

αvβ3 Integrin drives fibroblast contraction and strain stiffening of soft provisional matrix during progressive fibrosis

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Fibrosis is characterized by persistent deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) by fibroblasts. Fibroblast mechanosensing of a stiffened ECM is hypothesized to drive the fibrotic program; however, the spatial distribution of ECM mechanics and their derangements in progressive fibrosis are poorly characterized. Importantly, fibrosis presents with significant histopathological heterogeneity at the microscale. Here, we report that fibroblastic foci (FF), the regions of active fibrogenesis in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), are surprisingly of similar modulus as normal lung parenchyma and are nonlinearly elastic. In vitro, provisional ECMs with mechanical properties similar to those of FF activate both normal and IPF patient–derived fibroblasts, whereas type I collagen ECMs with similar mechanical properties do not. This is mediated, in part, by αvβ3 integrin engagement and is augmented by loss of expression of Thy-1, which regulates αvβ3 integrin avidity for ECM. Thy-1 loss potentiates cell contractility-driven strain stiffening of provisional ECM in vitro and causes elevated αvβ3 integrin activation, increased fibrosis, and greater mortality following fibrotic lung injury in vivo. These data suggest a central role for αvβ3 integrin and provisional ECM in overriding mechanical cues that normally impose quiescent phenotypes, driving progressive fibrosis through physical stiffening of the fibrotic niche.

Authors

Vincent F. Fiore, Simon S. Wong, Coleen Tran, Chunting Tan, Wenwei Xu, Todd Sulchek, Eric S. White, James S. Hagood, Thomas H. Barker

×

Figure 1

Characterization of microscale IPF tissue rigidity and elasticity.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Characterization of microscale IPF tissue rigidity and elasticity.
(A) E...
(A) Experimental setup of atomic force microscope (AFM) mechanical measurements, depicting the cantilever (red dotted line) overlying lung tissue. Fluorescence images were acquired using an inverted optical microscope in combination with AFM. DAPI (cell nuclei), tissue autofluorescence (mainly elastin microfibrils), and phase-contrast images are shown. Scale bar: 100 μm. (B) Example force indentation and Young’s modulus (E) indentation curves of fibroblastic foci (FF, blue) and mature fibrosis (MF, red) regions; the low indentation regime, Elow, is highlighted (pink dotted line, gray background) and the linearly elastic regime indentation limit, δL, is demarked (black dotted line, bottom). The equation to calculate Young’s modulus from force indentation is shown. (C) H&E staining of IPF tissue. Scale bar: 200 μm. (D) Magnified views of the region in C (green; zoom in region) stained for H&E, Masson’s trichrome, and fibronectin-EDA (FN-EDA, with regions of interest, including FF (blue box) and MF (red box), indicated. Scale bar: 100 μm. (E) AFM force maps with E (“black-red-white” heatmap, range 0–4 kPa for NL and FF; 0–10 kPa for MF) and elasticity (L; “rainbow” heatmap) shown for NL (data not shown), FF (blue box), and MF (red box), with regions of interest depicted in D. (F) Histogram of E values are shown for normal lung (NL, black; n = 5), FF (blue; n = 8), and MF (red; n = 6) regions from 2 patients, and Gaussian functions were fit to the distributions. (G) E and L values for the number of regions (N) and measurements (n). (H) Dot plots and the mean ± SD of L for the complete data set is shown.

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts