Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Brugada syndrome trafficking–defective Nav1.5 channels can trap cardiac Kir2.1/2.2 channels
Marta Pérez-Hernández, Marcos Matamoros, Silvia Alfayate, Paloma Nieto-Marín, Raquel G. Utrilla, David Tinaquero, Raquel de Andrés, Teresa Crespo, Daniela Ponce-Balbuena, B. Cicero Willis, Eric N. Jiménez-Vazquez, Guadalupe Guerrero-Serna, Andre M. da Rocha, Katherine Campbell, Todd J. Herron, F. Javier Díez-Guerra, Juan Tamargo, José Jalife, Ricardo Caballero, Eva Delpón
Marta Pérez-Hernández, Marcos Matamoros, Silvia Alfayate, Paloma Nieto-Marín, Raquel G. Utrilla, David Tinaquero, Raquel de Andrés, Teresa Crespo, Daniela Ponce-Balbuena, B. Cicero Willis, Eric N. Jiménez-Vazquez, Guadalupe Guerrero-Serna, Andre M. da Rocha, Katherine Campbell, Todd J. Herron, F. Javier Díez-Guerra, Juan Tamargo, José Jalife, Ricardo Caballero, Eva Delpón
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cardiology Cell biology

Brugada syndrome trafficking–defective Nav1.5 channels can trap cardiac Kir2.1/2.2 channels

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Cardiac Nav1.5 and Kir2.1–2.3 channels generate Na (INa) and inward rectifier K (IK1) currents, respectively. The functional INa and IK1 interplay is reinforced by the positive and reciprocal modulation between Nav15 and Kir2.1/2.2 channels to strengthen the control of ventricular excitability. Loss-of-function mutations in the SCN5A gene, which encodes Nav1.5 channels, underlie several inherited arrhythmogenic syndromes, including Brugada syndrome (BrS). We investigated whether the presence of BrS-associated mutations alters IK1 density concomitantly with INa density. Results obtained using mouse models of SCN5A haploinsufficiency, and the overexpression of native and mutated Nav1.5 channels in expression systems — rat ventricular cardiomyocytes and human induced pluripotent stem cell–derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) — demonstrated that endoplasmic reticulum (ER) trafficking–defective Nav1.5 channels significantly decreased IK1, since they did not positively modulate Kir2.1/2.2 channels. Moreover, Golgi trafficking–defective Nav1.5 mutants produced a dominant negative effect on Kir2.1/2.2 and thus an additional IK1 reduction. Moreover, ER trafficking–defective Nav1.5 channels can be partially rescued by Kir2.1/2.2 channels through an unconventional secretory route that involves Golgi reassembly stacking proteins (GRASPs). Therefore, cardiac excitability would be greatly affected in subjects harboring Nav1.5 mutations with Golgi trafficking defects, since these mutants can concomitantly trap Kir2.1/2.2 channels, thus unexpectedly decreasing IK1 in addition to INa.

Authors

Marta Pérez-Hernández, Marcos Matamoros, Silvia Alfayate, Paloma Nieto-Marín, Raquel G. Utrilla, David Tinaquero, Raquel de Andrés, Teresa Crespo, Daniela Ponce-Balbuena, B. Cicero Willis, Eric N. Jiménez-Vazquez, Guadalupe Guerrero-Serna, Andre M. da Rocha, Katherine Campbell, Todd J. Herron, F. Javier Díez-Guerra, Juan Tamargo, José Jalife, Ricardo Caballero, Eva Delpón

×

Figure 8

GRASP proteins can rescue endoplasmic reticulum trafficking–defective Nav1.5 mutants.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
GRASP proteins can rescue endoplasmic reticulum trafficking–defective Na...
(A) Hypothetical diagram of anterograde trafficking of Nav1.5 and Kir2.1 channels through conventional or unconventional routes. (B) Brefeldin A–resistant (BFA-resistant) Kir2.1 (IKir2.1) and Nav1.5 (INav1.5) currents recorded in CHO cells transfected with Kir2.1, Nav1.5, or Kir2.1+Nav1.5 channels after incubation with BFA for 24 hours. (C) IKir2.1 density at –120 mV recorded in cells in which GRASP55 was silenced or not, transfected with either Kir2.1 or Kir2.1+Nav1.5 channels. (D) Maximum INav1.5 density recorded in cells in which GRASP55 was silenced or not, transfected with either Nav1.5 or Kir2.1+Nav1.5 channels. In B–D, *P < 0.05 vs. Kir2.1 or Nav1.5 in control conditions; #P < 0.05 vs. Nav1.5+Kir2.1. (E) Mean current density-voltage curves for INav1.5 recorded in cells expressing p.D1690N or p.G1748D cotransfected or not with GRASP55 (GRASP). (F) Maximum INav1.5 density generated by WT, p.D1690N, and p.G1748D Nav1.5 channels cotransfected or not with GRASP55. In E and F, *P < 0.05 vs. WT or p.D1690N in the absence of GRASP55. Each bar/point represents mean ± SEM of n cells from at least 3 different batches, and each dot (B–D and F) represents 1 experiment. One-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls and multilevel mixed-effects model were used for comparisons.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts