Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Transcriptional corepressor SIN3A regulates hippocampal synaptic plasticity via Homer1/mGluR5 signaling
Morgan Bridi, … , Nelson Spruston, Ted Abel
Morgan Bridi, … , Nelson Spruston, Ted Abel
Published February 18, 2020
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2020;5(5):e92385. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.92385.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Genetics Neuroscience

Transcriptional corepressor SIN3A regulates hippocampal synaptic plasticity via Homer1/mGluR5 signaling

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Long-term memory depends on the control of activity-dependent neuronal gene expression, which is regulated by epigenetic modifications. The epigenetic modification of histones is orchestrated by the opposing activities of 2 classes of regulatory complexes: permissive coactivators and silencing corepressors. Much work has focused on coactivator complexes, but little is known about the corepressor complexes that suppress the expression of plasticity-related genes. Here, we define a critical role for the corepressor SIN3A in memory and synaptic plasticity, showing that postnatal neuronal deletion of Sin3a enhances hippocampal long-term potentiation and long-term contextual fear memory. SIN3A regulates the expression of genes encoding proteins in the postsynaptic density. Loss of SIN3A increases expression of the synaptic scaffold Homer1, alters the metabotropic glutamate receptor 1α (mGluR1α) and mGluR5 dependence of long-term potentiation, and increases activation of ERK in the hippocampus after learning. Our studies define a critical role for corepressors in modulating neural plasticity and memory consolidation and reveal that Homer1/mGluR signaling pathways may be central molecular mechanisms for memory enhancement.

Authors

Morgan Bridi, Hannah Schoch, Cédrick Florian, Shane G. Poplawski, Anamika Banerjee, Joshua D. Hawk, Giulia S. Porcari, Camille Lejards, Chang-Gyu Hahn, Karl-Peter Giese, Robbert Havekes, Nelson Spruston, Ted Abel

×

Figure 3

LTP enhancement by HDAC inhibitor administration is occluded in Sin3a neuronal hypomorphs.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
LTP enhancement by HDAC inhibitor administration is occluded in Sin3a ne...
(A) In control slices, perfusion with 1.65 μM TSA enhanced 1-train LTP compared with vehicle (controls + veh, n = 4; avg. fEPSP slope = 99.71% ± 7.24%; controls + TSA, n = 6; avg. fEPSP slope = 155.01% ± 9.47%; 2-way repeated measures ANOVA, genotype, F[1,16] = 10.604, P = 0.005; treatment, F[1,16] = 5.111, P = 0.038; genotype × treatment interaction, F[1,16] = 5.151, P = 0.037). (B) In Sin3aNH slices, TSA administration did not enhance LTP compared with vehicle (Sin3aNH + veh, n = 4; avg. fEPSP slope = 168.82% ± 2.05%; Sin3aNH + TSA, n = 6; avg. fEPSP slope = 169.34% ± 17.4%; Tukey’s post hoc, Sin3aNH + veh vs. Sin3aNH + TSA, P = 0.999). (C) Average fEPSP slopes over final 20 minutes from all groups. No significant difference was observed between control + TSA, Sin3aNH + veh, and Sin3a + TSA groups; these groups all displayed higher potentiation than control + veh slices (2-way repeated measures ANOVA; Tukey’s post hoc, controls + veh vs. controls + TSA, *P = 0.026; Tukey’s post hoc, control + veh vs. Sin3aNH + veh, *P = 0.012; control + veh vs. Sin3aNH + TSA, **P = 0.006; control + TSA vs. Sin3aNH + veh, P = 0.894; control + TSA vs. Sin3aNH + TSA, P = 0.862). All data are presented as mean ± SEM.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts