Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
IRF5 governs liver macrophage activation that promotes hepatic fibrosis in mice and humans
Fawaz Alzaid, … , Fabienne Foufelle, Nicolas Venteclef
Fawaz Alzaid, … , Fabienne Foufelle, Nicolas Venteclef
Published December 8, 2016
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2016;1(20):e88689. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.88689.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Hepatology Inflammation

IRF5 governs liver macrophage activation that promotes hepatic fibrosis in mice and humans

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Hepatic fibrosis arises from inflammation in the liver initiated by resident macrophage activation and massive leukocyte accumulation. Hepatic macrophages hold a central position in maintaining homeostasis in the liver and in the pathogenesis of acute and chronic liver injury linked to fibrogenesis. Interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) has recently emerged as an important proinflammatory transcription factor involved in macrophage activation under acute and chronic inflammation. Here, we revealed that IRF5 is significantly induced in liver macrophages from human subjects developing liver fibrosis from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease or hepatitis C virus infection. Furthermore, IRF5 expression positively correlated with clinical markers of liver damage, such as plasma transaminase and bilirubin levels. Interestingly, mice lacking IRF5 in myeloid cells (MKO) were protected from hepatic fibrosis induced by metabolic or toxic stresses. Transcriptional reprogramming of macrophages lacking IRF5 was characterized by immunosuppressive and antiapoptotic properties. Consequently, IRF5 MKO mice respond to hepatocellular stress by promoting hepatocyte survival, leading to complete protection from hepatic fibrogenesis. Our findings reveal a regulatory network, governed by IRF5, that mediates hepatocyte death and liver fibrosis in mice and humans. Therefore, modulating IRF5 function may be an attractive approach to experimental therapeutics in fibroinflammatory liver disease.

Authors

Fawaz Alzaid, Floriane Lagadec, Miguel Albuquerque, Raphaëlle Ballaire, Lucie Orliaguet, Isabelle Hainault, Corinne Blugeon, Sophie Lemoine, Agnès Lehuen, David G. Saliba, Irina A. Udalova, Valérie Paradis, Fabienne Foufelle, Nicolas Venteclef

×

Figure 7

IRF5 deficiency desensitizes hepatocytes to Fas receptor stimulation.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
IRF5 deficiency desensitizes hepatocytes to Fas receptor stimulation.
Wi...
Wild-type (MWT) mice and mice with myeloid-specific deletion of interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) (MKO) were administered an anti-Fas antibody (Jo2) for induction of apoptosis. (A) Representative images of H&E staining of liver sections from MWT and MKO mice after Jo2 administration. Right panel: plasma levels of aspartate transferase (AST) and alanine transferase (ALT) in MWT and MKO mice. (B) Representative images and quantification TUNEL+ apoptotic bodies in liver sections from MWT and MKO mice after Jo2 administration. (C) Quantification of IRF5 mRNA expression in hepatic F4/80+ liver mononuclear cells (LMNCs) in MWT and MKO mice after Jo2 administration. (D) Quantification of inflammatory marker expression in F4/80+ LMNCs in MWT and MKO mice after Jo2 administration. Markers quantified: IL1β, MHC II, IL6, TNF, arginase 1 (ARG1), TGFβ1, IL10, CD206. (E) Representative images and quantification of F4/80+ IHC staining of liver sections from Jo2-treated MWT and MKO mice. Flow cytometric quantification of F4/80+ CD11b+ macrophages among LMNCs of Jo2-treated MWT and MKO mice. (F) Flow cytometric quantification of CD11c+ and CD206+ macrophages among LMNCs of Jo2-treated MWT and MKO mice. (G) Quantification of FoxP3+ expression in CD25+CD4+ T cells, and of IL10, IL17, IFNγ expression by CD4+ T cells among LMNCs from MWT and MKO mice after Jo2 administration. Sham-treated mice: n = 6 per group; Jo2-treated mice: n = 6–8 per group. Scale bars: 100 μm. Differences between genotypes determined by unpaired 2-tailed t test. All values reported as mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01,***P < 0.001.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts