Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
IRF5 governs liver macrophage activation that promotes hepatic fibrosis in mice and humans
Fawaz Alzaid, … , Fabienne Foufelle, Nicolas Venteclef
Fawaz Alzaid, … , Fabienne Foufelle, Nicolas Venteclef
Published December 8, 2016
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2016;1(20):e88689. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.88689.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Hepatology Inflammation

IRF5 governs liver macrophage activation that promotes hepatic fibrosis in mice and humans

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Hepatic fibrosis arises from inflammation in the liver initiated by resident macrophage activation and massive leukocyte accumulation. Hepatic macrophages hold a central position in maintaining homeostasis in the liver and in the pathogenesis of acute and chronic liver injury linked to fibrogenesis. Interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) has recently emerged as an important proinflammatory transcription factor involved in macrophage activation under acute and chronic inflammation. Here, we revealed that IRF5 is significantly induced in liver macrophages from human subjects developing liver fibrosis from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease or hepatitis C virus infection. Furthermore, IRF5 expression positively correlated with clinical markers of liver damage, such as plasma transaminase and bilirubin levels. Interestingly, mice lacking IRF5 in myeloid cells (MKO) were protected from hepatic fibrosis induced by metabolic or toxic stresses. Transcriptional reprogramming of macrophages lacking IRF5 was characterized by immunosuppressive and antiapoptotic properties. Consequently, IRF5 MKO mice respond to hepatocellular stress by promoting hepatocyte survival, leading to complete protection from hepatic fibrogenesis. Our findings reveal a regulatory network, governed by IRF5, that mediates hepatocyte death and liver fibrosis in mice and humans. Therefore, modulating IRF5 function may be an attractive approach to experimental therapeutics in fibroinflammatory liver disease.

Authors

Fawaz Alzaid, Floriane Lagadec, Miguel Albuquerque, Raphaëlle Ballaire, Lucie Orliaguet, Isabelle Hainault, Corinne Blugeon, Sophie Lemoine, Agnès Lehuen, David G. Saliba, Irina A. Udalova, Valérie Paradis, Fabienne Foufelle, Nicolas Venteclef

×

Figure 5

IRF5 knockout alters hepatic macrophage transcriptome response to experimental fibrosis.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
IRF5 knockout alters hepatic macrophage transcriptome response to experi...
Wild-type (MWT) mice and mice with myeloid-specific deletion of interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) (MKO) were maintained on carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) for induction of experimental fibrosis. (A) Global heatmap and heatmaps of target transcripts representing transcriptomic analysis of F4/80+ liver mononuclear cells (LMNCs) from MWT and MKO mice following CCl4 treatment. (B) qRT-PCR confirmation of target transcript expression from F4/80+ cells of MWT and MKO mice following CCl4 treatment. Markers quantified: IL1β, MHC II, IL6, TNF, arginase 1 (ARG1), TGFβ1, IL10, CD206. (C) Quantification of IL4 and IL13 expression among CD4+ T cells from LMNCs of MWT and MKO mice following CCl4 treatment. (D) Representative images and quantification of TUNEL+ apoptotic bodies in liver sections from MWT and MKO mice following CCl4 treatment. (E) Representative IHC of Fas ligand (FasL) in liver sections from MWT and MKO mice following CCl4 treatment. Quantification of FasL+ staining of and FasL mRNA expression in hepatic F4/80+ cells. (F) Quantification of FasL and TNF expression among macrophages from LMNCs of MWT and MKO mice following CCl4 treatment. (G) Quantification of Fas, B cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2), and BCL-extra large (BCL-XL) mRNA expression in primary hepatocytes from MWT and MKO mice following CCl4 treatment. For transcriptome analysis, n = 3 per group; other analyses, n = 6–12 per group. Scale bars: 100 μm. Differences between genotypes determined by unpaired 2-tailed t test. All values reported as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Transcriptome filtering based on a detection P value less than 0.05, difference to control (MWT) of more than 2-fold change and adjusted P value less than 0.05.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts