Usage Information
Abstract
Identifying mechanisms of kidney disease commonly involves comparing diseased samples to healthy reference tissues; however, the effects of variability in tissue procurement, storage, and donor characteristics remain underexplored. In this study, we systematically evaluated three reference tissue types—tumor nephrectomy (TN), pre-transplant biopsies from living donors (LD), and percutaneous biopsies from healthy control volunteers (HC)—to determine their impact on differential gene expression across three diabetic kidney disease (DKD) states. We observed distinct injury markers, cell state proportions, and gene signatures associated with procurement method, sex, and donor age. Adjustment for these confounding factors significantly influenced pathway analysis results. Specifically, correcting for age and sex eliminated significant enrichment of interferon gamma response in the diabetes mellitus–resilient (DM-R) versus HC comparison. Processes related to biological aging were enriched in older reference tissues, potentially confounding disease-specific interpretations. Importantly, tumor necrosis factor signaling via nuclear factor-κB remained enriched in LD and TN samples relative to HC, even after accounting for confounders. These results underscore the critical importance of selecting appropriate control tissues and rigorously adjusting for confounding variables to reliably discern the molecular mechanisms underlying kidney diseases.
Authors
Rajasree Menon, Paul L. Kimmel, Edgar A. Otto, Lalita Subramanian, Christopher L. O'Connor, Bradley Godfrey, Cathy Smith, Fadhl Alakwaa, Celine C. Berthier, Minnie M. Sarwal, E. Steve Woodle, Laura Pyle, Ye Ji Choi, Patricia Ladd, John R. Sedor, Sylvia E. Rosas, Sushrut S. Waikar, Abhijit S. Naik, Ricardo Melo Ferreira, Michael T. Eadon, Markus Bitzer, Petter Bjornstad, Jeffrey B. Hodgin, Matthias Kretzler
Usage data is cumulative from May 2026 through May 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 273 | 0 |
| 141 | 0 | |
| Supplemental data | 98 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 104 | 0 |
| Totals | 616 | 0 |
| Total Views | 616 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
