We previously reported that excessive angiotensin-II→AT receptor-1 (AT→ATR1) signaling results in sickle cell anemia–associated (SCA-associated) nephropathy. Herein, we showed that hyperangiotensinemia in SCA results from high erythroid cell–generated reactive oxygen species (ROS), which oxidized angiotensinogen (ATGN) and favored its rapid conversion to AT. Increased AT→ATR1 signaling in SCA erythroid cells generated ROS and created a positive feedback loop of ROS→oxidized ATGN→AT→ATR1→ROS, perpetuating the hyperangiotensinemia. ATR1 blocker, losartan, reduced erythrocyte ROS, oxidized ATGN, and AT levels. The ROS→AT→ATR1→ROS loop was driven by sickle erythropoiesis, as it was reproduced when WT mice were transplanted with SCA hematopoiesis. Using SCA and WT mice with germline- and erythroid-specific ATR1 deficiency, we found that stress erythropoiesis, but not steady-state erythropoiesis, was critically dependent on erythroid AT→ATR1 signaling, which acted in harmony with increased erythropoietin signaling. Furthermore, instead of the canonical AT→ATR1→NADPH-oxidase→ROS signaling in steady-state erythropoiesis, AT→ATR1 signaling in stress erythroid cells increased mitochondrial mass and dysfunctional mitochondria, which thereby increased ROS. SCA mice with erythroid-specific ATR1 deficiency had decreased RBC accumulation of dysfunctional mitochondria and decreased ROS, which reduced SCA-associated nephropathy. Overall, we demonstrate that AT→ATR1 signaling was essential for stress erythropoiesis but led to increased dysfunctional mitochondria retention in mature RBCs, which generated ROS and perpetuated hyperangiotensinemia, resulting in end-organ damage.
Parul Rai, Swarnava Roy, Paritha Arumugam, Diamantis G. Konstantinidis, Sithara Raju Ponny, Marthe-Sandrine Eiymo Mwa Mpollo, Archana Shrestha, Theodosia A. Kalfa, Punam Malik
Usage data is cumulative from March 2026 through May 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 742 | 0 |
| 216 | 0 | |
| Figure | 64 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 171 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 66 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,259 | 0 |
| Total Views | 1,259 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.