Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common adult leukemia diagnosis. Bone marrow (BM) niche significantly influences the initiation and progression of AML. However, our knowledge about the effect of leukemic niche on leukemia stem cells (LSC) and leukemogenesis is limited. In this study, we identified an extrinsic-regulatory function of latexin (Lxn) in leukemogenesis. Using a MLL-AF9–induced AML mouse model in WT and Lxn-KO (Lxn–/–) recipient mice, we found that Lxn deletion in the BM niche enhanced the survival of AML mice by suppressing LSCs and reducing blood blasts. Single-cell RNA-seq of stromal cells and cell communication analysis uncovered downregulation of the leukemia inhibitory factor receptor (LIFR) signaling pathway in the Lxn–/– niche, particularly within mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). Mechanistically, reduced LIFR level in Lxn–/– MSCs upregulated Cxcl9 expression, leading to increased recruitment of CD8 T cells and enhanced cytotoxicity against leukemic cells. Combination of Lxn niche deletion and immune checkpoint inhibitor PD-1 further prolonged survival. The findings have important clinical implications, suggesting that Lxn inhibition could improve the efficacy of AML therapies by targeting the leukemia niche and enhancing immune surveillance.
Cuiping Zhang, Xia Yao, Pinpin Sui, Liming Hou, Bowen Yan, Larry L. Luchsinger, Gang Huang, Sheng Tong, Youwen Zhang, Bojing Shao, Hong Qian, Hong Zheng, Hui Zhong, Feng-Chun Yang, Ying Liang
Usage data is cumulative from October 2026 through October 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 214 | 0 |
| 75 | 0 | |
| Figure | 112 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 130 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 45 | 0 |
| Totals | 576 | 0 |
| Total Views | 576 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.