Empirical data from survivors of Lassa fever and experimental disease modeling efforts, particularly those using mouse models, are at odds with respect to T cell–mediated pathogenesis. In mice, T cells have been shown to be imperative in disease progression and lethality, whereas in humans, an early and robust T cell response has been associated with survival. Here, we assessed the role of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells on disease progression and severity of Lassa virus infection in a nonhuman primate model. Using an antibody-mediated T cell depletion strategy prior to and after inoculation, we were able to examine Lassa virus infection in the absence of specific T cell responses. In animals depleted for either CD4+ or CD8+ T cells, Lassa virus infection remained uniformly lethal, with only a slight delay in disease progression was observed in the CD4-depleted group when compared with nondepleted controls. Milder pulmonary pathology was noticed in the absence of CD4+ or CD8+ T cells. Overall, our findings suggest that T cells have a limited effect on the development of Lassa fever in nonhuman primates.
Jérémie Prévost, Nikesh Tailor, Geoff Soule, Jonathan Audet, Yvon Deschambault, Robert Vendramelli, Jessica Prado-Smith, Kevin Tierney, Kimberly Azaransky, Darwyn Kobasa, Chad S. Clancy, Heinz Feldmann, Kyle Rosenke, David Safronetz
Usage data is cumulative from September 2025 through December 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 727 | 0 |
| 299 | 0 | |
| Figure | 159 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 84 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 205 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,474 | 0 |
| Total Views | 1,474 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.