Usage Information
Abstract
Autoimmune diabetes encompasses rapidly progressive type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) and indolent latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA), which represent distinct inflammatory set points along a shared autoimmune spectrum. Yet, the immunological mechanisms that determine these divergent inflammatory states remain unresolved. We performed single-cell RNA sequencing with paired T and B cell receptor profiling on over 400,000 PBMCs from patients with LADA, newly diagnosed T1D, and individuals acting as healthy controls. PBMC composition was comparable across cohorts, indicating that qualitative rather than quantitative immune differences underlie disease heterogeneity. In T1D, pan-lineage activation of NF-κB, EGFR, MAPK, and hypoxia pathways, coupled with a TNF-centered communication hub, enhanced MHC signaling, disrupted adhesion, and promoted systemic inflammation. LADA, by contrast, exhibited global suppression of NF-κB/EGFR activity, retention of moderate JAK/STAT tone, reinforced NK cell inhibitory checkpoints via HLA-C–KIR2DL3/3DL1 interaction, and stabilized CD8+ T cell synapses through HLA-C–CD8 binding, collectively restraining effector activation. Single-cell V(D)J analysis revealed multiclonal, patient-unique adaptive repertoires, emphasizing the primacy of signaling context over receptor convergence. These findings define autoimmune diabetes as an inflammatory-inhibitory set-point continuum, positioning the NF-κB/EGFR–JAK/STAT gradient and HLA-C–KIR axis as potential therapeutic targets to preserve residual β cell function.
Authors
Ivan I. Golodnikov, Elizaveta S. Podshivalova, Vadim I. Chechekhin, Anatoliy V. Zubritskiy, Alina A. Matrosova, Nikita A. Sergeev, Margarita D. Samsonova, Yaroslav V. Dvoryanchikov, Tatiana V. Nikonova, Ekaterina V. Bondarenko, Marina Yu. Loguinova, Yulia A. Medvedeva, Dmitry N. Laptev, Rita I. Khusainova, Ildar R. Minniakhmetov, Marina V. Shestakova, Natalia G. Mokrysheva, Ivan I. Dedov
Usage data is cumulative from December 2025 through May 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 3,077 | 77 |
| 858 | 22 | |
| Figure | 642 | 0 |
| Table | 253 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 373 | 3 |
| Citation downloads | 191 | 0 |
| Totals | 5,394 | 102 |
| Total Views | 5,496 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
