The estrogen receptor is hypothesized to directly influence HIV-transcription and latency but is also critical for immune signaling. However, the mechanisms of action of the estrogen receptor (ER) in immune cells in the context of HIV are limited, and relevant to HIV cure strategies, the influence of latency reversal agents (LRAs) on the ER pathway are unknown. We evaluated a) the impact of estrogen (E2) on the nuclear translocation of estrogen receptor α (ERα) in CD4+ T cells, b) the ability of Fulvestrant, a selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), and ARV-471, a novel, potent, PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera (PROTAC) selective ERα degrader to modulate ER and c) the impact of different classes of LRAs on ER signaling. In contrast to what has been demonstrated in oncology, E2 does not induce ERα nuclear translocation in CD4+ T cells. Similarly, neither Fulvestrant nor ARV-471 induced degradation of ERα in CD4+ T cells. LRAs significantly downregulated ERα gene and protein expression in both PBMCs and CD4+ T cells. Collectively, our results suggest that estrogen influences on HIV transcription are not likely a consequence of canonical nuclear ERα mechanisms. The consequences of LRA downregulation of ER, a protein important for immune signaling, warrants further investigation.
Cristina Ceriani, Priya Khetan, Anthony Abeyta-Lopez, Kena J. Lemu, Prachi Meher, Brigitte Allard, Katherine S. James, Anne-Marie W. Turner, David M. Margolis, Nancie M. Archin
Usage data is cumulative from July 2026 through July 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Totals | 0 | 0 |
| Total Views | 0 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.