Usage Information
Abstract
Despite the widespread use of adenovirus, mRNA, and protein-based vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic, their relative immunological profiles and protective efficacies remain incompletely defined. Here, we compared antigen kinetics, innate and adaptive immune responses, and protective efficacy following Ad5, mRNA, and protein vaccination in mice. Ad5 induced the most sustained antigen expression, but mRNA induced the most potent IFN responses, associated with robust antigen presentation and costimulation. Unlike Ad5 vaccines, which were hindered by preexisting vector immunity, mRNA vaccines retained efficacy after repeated use. As a single-dose regimen, Ad5 vaccines elicited higher immune responses. However, as a prime-boost regimen, and particularly in Ad5 seropositive mice, mRNA vaccines were more immunogenic than the other vaccine platforms. These findings highlight strengths of each vaccine platform and underscore the importance of host serostatus in determining optimal vaccine performance.
Authors
Bakare Awakoaiye, Shiyi Li, Sarah Sanchez, Tanushree Dangi, Nahid Irani, Laura Arroyo, Gabriel Arellano, Shadi Mohammadabadi, Malika Aid, Pablo Penaloza-MacMaster
Usage data is cumulative from November 2025 through March 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 3,642 | 217 |
| 410 | 29 | |
| Figure | 758 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 203 | 30 |
| Citation downloads | 105 | 0 |
| Totals | 5,118 | 276 |
| Total Views | 5,394 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
