Usage Information
Loss of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and poor response to immunotherapy in IDH GOF mutant melanoma
Abstract
Recent innovations in melanoma treatment with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) have improved overall outcomes for patients; however, over 50% of patients still develop resistance to treatment. These patients either have intrinsic resistance and never respond to therapy or develop acquired resistance months or years into treatment. The mechanisms underlying ICB resistance remain poorly understood. Our data show that patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase gain-of-function (IDH GOF) mutant melanoma have a worse response to anti-PD1 immunotherapy. IDH mutations have been found to be oncogenic and associated with differential methylation in multiple cancers but are not yet characterized in human melanoma. Here, we investigate the clinical, immune, and transcriptional phenotypes of IDH GOF melanomas through analyses of clinical response, single-cell RNA-seq, bulk RNA-seq, and DNA methylation data. Single-cell data analysis showed decreased immune infiltrate and activity in the IDH GOF tumors. Bulk sequencing data demonstrated the association among IDH mutation, immune exclusion, and disruptions in global DNA methylation. The melanoma-derived genomic data presented support previously described resistance mechanisms of IDH mutation in other cancer types and is the first demonstration to our knowledge of the role of IDH GOF in the human melanoma tumor microenvironment.
Authors
Emma Specht, Lakshmi Pakanati, Meng-Ju Wu, Russell W. Jenkins, Derek N. Effiom, Nabeel Bardeesy, Bradley E. Bernstein, Moshe Sade-Feldman, Christine G. Lian, Genevieve M. Boland, Elena Torlai Triglia, Sonia Cohen
Usage data is cumulative from April 2026 through July 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,499 | 0 |
| 438 | 0 | |
| Figure | 382 | 0 |
| Table | 48 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 198 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 278 | 0 |
| Totals | 2,843 | 0 |
| Total Views | 2,843 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
