Talc pleurodesis is highly effective for preventing recurrence of pneumothorax and pleural effusion, but it can be complicated by dissemination, acute lung injury, lead exposure, and foreign body–induced chronic inflammation and pain. Our objective is to develop a safe, biodegradable, contaminant-free particle for pleurodesis. We used mouse models of pneumothorax and malignant pleural effusion to compare the efficacy and safety of pleurodesis with talc and hydroxyapatite microspheres (HAM). Intrapleural instillation of microspheres induced pleural adhesions, fibrosis, and symphysis as effectively as talc and resulted in more durable protection from experimental pneumothorax. HAM and talc both induced an osteoclastogenic, inflammatory, and fibrotic response in pleural lavage cells. Intrapleural HAM was resorbed by osteoclast action over 3 months, whereas talc was not cleared. Deletion of the osteoclast effector, CTSK, diminished pleural adhesion formation and fibrosis by HAM, and inhibition of osteoclastogenesis with anti-RANKL antibody delayed HAM clearance. We found no difference in activity level, feeding behavior, or lung compliance between particles, but talc induced more persistent pleural inflammation. We conclude that HAM resulted in an osteoclastogenic and fibrogenic pleural response that induced pleurodesis that was more durable than talc with a superior safety profile due in part to osteoclast-mediated particle clearance.
Yusuke Tanaka, Yuki Takahashi, Yuma Shindo, Lori B. Pitstick, Steven L. Teitelbaum, Wei Zou, Xiangning Wang, Jason C. Woods, Kathryn A. Wikenheiser-Brokamp, Francis X. McCormack
Usage data is cumulative from August 2025 through March 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,678 | 84 |
| 365 | 39 | |
| Figure | 316 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 119 | 4 |
| Citation downloads | 128 | 0 |
| Totals | 2,606 | 127 |
| Total Views | 2,733 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.